Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Kārlis Teodors Hūns - On the Eve of St. Bartholomew's Night (Ligist) - Google Art Project.jpg
[edit]_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: long out of copyright Denniss (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Karl Gothard Grass - The Caracci Waterfall Near Aderno at the Foot of Mt. Etna - Google Art Project.jpg
[edit]
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, is long out of copyright Denniss (<span class="}) 12:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Peteforsyth as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image on screen is not credited, no license given Sven Manguard Wha? 22:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: After converting this from a speedy to a DR, I saw User_talk:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF)#Undeleted_a_number_of_photos, which includes this image. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation 81.198.70.52 11:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: long out of copyright Denniss (talk) 10:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Hulupone und Lupotrione.png (by the same uploader). Leyo 21:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- {{Löschen}} new picture in a better resolution has been uploaded --LC Uni Hohenheim (talk) 15:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)LC Uni Hohenheim 17:41, 07.Juli 2014
Deleted: FASTILY 17:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Same thing as for File:Ostaustralischer Sägehai Weiß.png: modified from File:Pristiophorus_nudipinnis_McCoy.jpg to assist fake article and claimed as own work; no educational value Gretarsson (talk) 10:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am writing on behalf of Latvian National Museum of Art. This file must be deleted, because it is downloaded illegally from our Google Art Project account/profile:http://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/collection/national-museum-latvia?projectId=art-project and uploaded in this website illegally. We have ownership for this file and according to our agreement with According to our agreement background with GOOGLE „(F.(...)Google will not(...)(3)offer any features that enable users to download the High/Medium Resolution Images from Google products or services”s. That means files are downloaded illegally from our account in GoogeArtProject and uploaded here.According to the fact that WikimediaCommons allows dowload all sizes of this file, we have already found companies who are using these files for printed canvas without agreement with our institution.Please update me about this situation: annija.sauka@lnmm.lv 81.198.70.52 09:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- I looked at the Google Art Project account. I see that the file in question is offered in very high resolution in preview mode. Technically, viewing all the parts of a high resolution image is the same as downloading that part of the image. Further, in the agreement fragment you mentioned, it's not an agreement between the viewer/user and you, but between Google and you, and Google didn't upload this image. In any case, IMO, now that it's out there, you can't get remove it on the grounds that you "never meant for the high-res version to be distributed outside of Google's Art Project". Such images are considered to be in the public domain in the United States, as supported by Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. --Agamemnus (talk) 20:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Keep I see nothing still copyrighted here. Ankry (talk) 15:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art applies. Yann (talk) 13:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a copyrighted derivative image. Leoboudv (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep this image. My mistake. It appears to be an overhead photo of a typewriter and not a poster. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 13:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Does not look like an actual hanging. There is too much frivolity. No details are given. The "victim" looks like a dummy being hoisted by a rope, and one cowboy is aiming a pistol as though he were shooting at a target. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Even assuming this is true, what is the Policy Based Reason? The fact is, it is used in two projects, and it is well out of copyright, so I'm not seeing a policy reason for deletion. Do you have personal experience at hangings to know what a real hanging would look like? M.O. Stevens 04:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use, therefore, in scope. Yann (talk) 13:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, collage of personal shots of no use. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, personal shots of a likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 37.5.2.120 09:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As indicated, this is an artwork by "Gabriel D`Empaire", a painter from Venezuela. Considering http://vereda.ula.ve/wiki_artevenezolano/index.php/D'Empaire,_Gabriel (slow loading, use cached version) the artist died in 1971 = without permission copyrighted till the end of 2031 (Venezuela has 60 pma).
Nominating also (per above):
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 22:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Article de:Cleasy deleted. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Scan of a book - copyright not likely held by uploader, and more information would be required to determine if this is PD due to age. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kaldari (talk) 23:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Apparent scan/photo of a photo - more information is needed regarding the original photographer and publication date. Uploader, if you are the original photographer or know why the original photograph should be considered public domain or freely licensed, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused & useles. Was a part of a dropped article "I love her blablabla". Bilderling (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused & useles. Was a part of a dropped article "I love her blablabla". Bilderling (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused & useles. Was a part of a dropped article "I love her blablabla". Wiki is not Facebook. Bilderling (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused & useles. Was a part of a dropped article "I love her blablabla". Wiki is not Facebook. Bilderling (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused & useles. Was a part of a dropped article "I love her blablabla". Wiki is not Facebook. Bilderling (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused & useles. Was a part of a dropped article "I love her blablabla". Wiki is not Facebook. Bilderling (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Uploader is confused at best regarding copyright, and it is unlikely this is uploader's {{Own}} work (small size, no metadata and previously published online). The precautionary principle should apply. Storkk (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.120 10:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
poster, includes web-address Motopark (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Article de:Luxury lifestyle awards deleted. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Article de:Luxury lifestyle awards deleted. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lahcenemeribai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-resolution versions of high-end photographs uploaded through Wiki Loves Earth, some of them with watermarks from algerie-monde.com. If the uploader really is the original author of the images (which I'd tend to doubt), we need a written permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:غروب الشمس مدينة القالة 2.jpg
- File:Vcalle b22.jpg
- File:Sahara136.jpg
- File:Sahara135.jpg
- File:Libye slub8 lhuillier.jpg
- File:Djanet-illizi-illizi-algeria+1152 12980243502-tpfil02aw-13861.jpg
- File:Assekrem.jpg
- File:Djanet e4.jpg
- File:50861-coucher-de-soleil-sur-les-montagnes-de-djanet-illizi.jpg
- File:356x235 fb34111660d2c07420f7d334ab7cbb692ffa8b47.jpg
- File:Singe-cap-carbon-bejaia.jpg
- File:Pt35476.jpg
- File:Environs-jijel.jpg
- File:Cap-carbon-bejaia-1.jpg
- File:2647033494 small 1.jpg
- File:Ruines-romaines-tipaza-1.jpg
- File:Pt85525.jpg
- File:58188-plage-de-sidi-braham-commune-de-gouraya-wilaya-de-tipaza.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 11:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ancient Nadipathy (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files appear to be stolen from here: "Copy Rights Reserved & Trademark Registered @ Nadipathy.2013".
- File:Yoga therapy.jpg
- File:Water Therapy.jpg
- File:Vitamin Therapy.jpg
- File:Vision Therapy.jpg
- File:Vedic Yoga.jpg
- File:Urine therapy.jpg
- File:Treehug.jpg
- File:Tens Therapy.jpg
- File:Sunshine healing therapy.jpg
- File:Sun lens Therapy.jpg
- File:Sujok Number & color therapy.jpg
- File:Sujok Therapy.jpg
- File:Sujok Acupuncture.jpg
- File:Spiritual mind Treatment.jpg
- File:Spine Reflex Therapy.jpg
- File:Sound Therapy.jpg
- File:Sonopuncture.jpg
- File:Smile Yoga.jpg
- File:Smile Taiji.jpg
- File:Smile Meditation.jpg
- File:Shiatsu self massage therapy.jpg
- File:Sixki treatment.jpg
- File:Sheitsu.jpg
- File:Seed Therapy.jpg
- File:Rolfing Therapy.jpg
- File:Reiki Therapy.jpg
- File:Pyramid Therapy.jpg
- File:Reflex Therapy.jpg
- File:Pulse Balancing.jpg
- File:Beach Sand TherapyBest.jpg
- File:Crop Circles theory.jpg
- File:Pranic Healing.jpg
- File:Polarity Therapy.jpg
- File:Physio Therapy.jpg
- File:Pendulam Therapy.jpg
- File:Nutritional therapy.jpg
- File:Panchakarma Therapy.jpg
- File:Naturopathy.jpg
- File:Nadi Chikithsa.jpg
- File:Nadi healing.jpg
- File:Mudra Therapy.jpg
- File:Moxa Therapy.jpg
- File:Meridians massage.jpg
- File:Massage therapy.jpg
- File:Marma Therapy.jpg
- File:Magnet Therapy.jpg
- File:Lymph Drainage therapy.jpg
- File:Light Therapy.jpg
- File:Leech therapy.jpg
- File:Hormon yoga therapy.jpg
- File:Foot Therapy.jpg
- File:Five Elements.jpg
- File:Finger Therapy.jpg
- File:Feng Shui.jpg
- File:Electro Acupuncture.jpg
- File:Ear pircing therapy.jpg
- File:Cupping Therapy.jpg
- File:Crystal therapy.jpg
- File:Craniosacral.jpg
- File:Cosmotic Acupuncture.jpg
- File:Chromo Therapy.jpg
- File:Candle Therapy.jpg
- File:Bown Therapy.jpg
- File:Bee Venom Therapy.jpg
- File:Bach Flower Therapy.jpg
- File:Auricular Acupuncture.jpg
- File:Auricular therapy.jpg
- File:Acupuncture.jpg
- File:Alternative Healing Therapies.jpg
- File:Acupressure Therapy.jpg
- File:Acu Yoga.jpg
- File:Acu Meridians.jpg
- File:Acu Touch.jpg
- File:Human body with 72000 Nadi system.JPG
- File:Prenatal therapy.jpg
- File:Acu Detox Therapy.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 11:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete Probably copyright violations, most are of sub-par quality and unusable in most cases. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:کتاب بررسی وضعیت سلسله مراتب ارزشها در بین دانشجویان تحصیل کرده با قصد ادامه تحصیل در خارج از کشور دکتر حمیده جهانگیری.pdf
[edit]From what I can gather from the google-translated description, this seems to be out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 12:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete text only Motopark (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
selfie (the king of kings) Kopiersperre (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
pair selfie Kopiersperre (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
pair selfie Kopiersperre (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
spam, out of scope, del on de Nolispanmo 13:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Www-rarasouvenir-com-kmi bergerak di bidang kipas undangan lbih dri 5thun,bgi anda yg mau order bsa hub kmi 2014-04-02 00-30.jpg
[edit]
looks to me like out of scope. JuTa 13:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kun Alcides Rivero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Sampecbc88a0b97f8f30.jpg
- File:Sampd85da82525758869.jpg
- File:Sampc1809a774d73ab7f.jpg
- File:Sampd0c95b451d029eac.jpg
- File:Sampc529ae2cd1a5bd1d.jpg
- File:Sampb4a0db850c86073d.jpg
- File:Sampc8c9efcf692e59cf.jpg
- File:Sampad49d912292082c5.jpg
- File:Samp27203732213ff7b1.jpg
- File:Sampa6acec10c080e329.jpg
- File:Samp4321aaea3bcefe82.jpg
- File:Sampf29cc4c3fb398d54.jpg
- File:Samp2605e09c9c37812c.jpg
- File:Samp967a4a7f94391f44.jpg
- File:Samp32a8417bea69359e.jpg
- File:Samp21dd29d5ebf81f15.jpg
- File:Samp18d63eeb3ba55792.jpg
- File:Samp11e3f429e46d08a7.jpg
- File:Samp9bd2b387897b325a.jpg
- File:Samp8fc4a06d2e0a27f9.jpg
- File:Samp8d4ccf741451be4e.jpg
- File:Samp7c07579941afeffd.jpg
- File:Samp4bb59507c98a97bf.jpg
- File:Samp3e746c8863d49e3d.jpg
- File:Samp0f7775414cb2ecb4.jpg
- File:4037-11-es-0a46defb486e6be33ad835a352a724b8.jpg
- File:719-2-es-8f6725fafe1388c094d999e0f1e0c9f9.jpg
- File:1141-9-es-692ee3224a66d3a71acd292c0d33afee.jpg
- File:52-2-es-b0f84986f29264e536eb95ceb5b28991.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valeee rusher girl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aleksandar Veselinovski (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims. All other uploads made using this account were deleted last year. As seen in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aleksandar Veselinovski2 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by VOSTANIK, the uploader claims to be the author of photos taken with two different point-and-shoot cameras and one DSLR, switching back and forth several times between 9:48 and 10:45.
- File:Macedonian ARMY Plamen M-63.JPG
- File:Macedonian ARMY BMP-2.JPG
- File:Macedonian ARMY Land Rover.JPG
- File:Macedonian ARMY HMMWV.jpg
- File:Macedonian ARMY Iveco.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused personal logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:بررسی نقش آموزش روشهای شناختی رفتاری و آموزش آرامسازی بر کاهش اضطراب رابطه جنسی دکتر حمیده جهانگیری.pdf
[edit]text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:کتاب تاثیر اصوات موسیقی بر میزان تمرکز حواس و توجه دانشآموزان مبتلا به ADHD دکتر حمیده جهانگیری.pdf
[edit]text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:کتاب بررسی میزان اختلالات عملکرد جنسی در بیماران مبتلا به اختلال افسردگی تحت دارو درمانی در شهر تهران دکتر حمیده جهانگیری.pdf
[edit]text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:کتاب مطالعه کیفیت زندگی، ادراک بیماری و سبکهای دلبستگی بیماران سالمند مبتلا به دیابت دکتر حمیده جهانگیری.pdf
[edit]text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
File:کتاب فرهنگ جامع علوم شناختی، روانشناسی، روانپزشکی(انگلیسی – فارسی( دکتر حمیده جهانگیری.pdf
[edit]text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some hompage material Motopark (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, bitte um Löschung, habe PD-70 verwechselt: Bild ist älter, Maler erst 1965 verstorben. Daher leider ungültige Lizenz Fäberer (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC) ask for deletion, i have confounded something by PD-70: Image is older, painter died in 1965. Therefore, unfortunately, invalid license for this picture i did upload. --Fäberer (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no EXIF, low res... Trijnsteltalk 16:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
COM:DW, unlikely created by the uploader Krd 17:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Does not look like own work of the uploader as stated. Who is the author? Is is old enough for i.e. {{PD-old}}? JuTa 17:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 11.+12.08.2007 these photos (and 2 book covers: File:Mora juicio dioses.jpg + File:Fuego dioses.jpg, published 2001 and 1982) are configured with multiple sources and a migrated GFDL/cc-by-sa-3.0 license. Mostly involved is "Biblioteca Luis Angel Arango" = (today) http://www.banrepcultural.org/. All files have in common that no date and author is given (which is contradictory to the cc-by-sa-3.0-license) and need - by whomever - permission.
- File:Mejia orlando.JPG
- File:Fuego dioses.jpg
- File:Osorio jose.jpg
- File:Fuenmayor jose.jpg
- File:Mora juicio dioses.jpg
- File:Mora velez.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Provenance is lacking for the consituent images- to be usable on Commons, all must be PD and demonstrably so. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. All files uploaded in a row on 03.05.2014 — related to Spanish city es:Comillas (Cantabria) — were previously published on Facebook by unknown user, considering (examples): File:1901405 464450057019542 8084031610839092514 n.jpg --> grabbed from https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/t1.0-9/1901405_464450057019542_8084031610839092514_n.jpg (last modified: 04.2014) + File:10259878 464542407010307 7155942912057159419 n.jpg --> grabbed from https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/t1.0-9/10259878_464542407010307_7155942912057159419_n.jpg (last modified: 04.2014) + File:10245353 465941260203755 3160333713502530063 n.jpg --> grabbed from https://scontent-b-vie.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-9/10245353_465941260203755_3160333713502530063_n.jpg (last modified: 04.2014).
Nominating also:
- File:Mosaico Comillas.jpg --> The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user.
- File:10320464 464451490352732 4525706451414414100 n.jpg
- File:10307222 464548557009692 2426582348853706686 n.jpg
- File:10298897 465943453536869 4155824163912977608 n.jpg
- File:10259878 464542407010307 7155942912057159419 n.jpg
- File:10247811 464444637020084 4178695990972408125 n.jpg
- File:10245353 465941260203755 3160333713502530063 n.jpg
- File:10172586 464447937019754 6379746739907441952 n.jpg
- File:10171227 464540587010489 8139837282711322273 n.jpg
- File:10154232 450779891719892 526651121 n.jpg
- File:10013300 450773585053856 2133814615 n.jpg
- File:10006242 450781191719762 417760690 n.jpg
- File:1926806 450775271720354 748483146 n.jpg
- File:1901405 464450057019542 8084031610839092514 n.jpg
- File:1619361 450778625053352 1486390225 n.jpg
- File:1480685 464442447020303 4543680525513033797 n.jpg
- File:970968 450771741720707 1840490813 n.jpg
- File:1499611 450783058386242 808204031 n.jpg
- File:Mosaico Comillas.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Per DR above and upload log it's pretty obvious that the uploader is not aware of copyright issues. The remaining pictures show similar flaws, as each of them has different EXIT data, as if coming from six different cameras. Per COM:PRP, they should be removed
- File:Nochi de Sanjuan en Comillas..JPG
- File:Entrada al Folkomillas Festival y Mercau Comillas Meyeval..JPG
- File:Actuaciones musicales del Arco Atlantico durante tres dias..JPG
- File:Dia de la caballa.jpg
- File:Cabalgata de Reyes Magos.JPG
- File:Carnaval Culebre Comillas.jpg
- File:Esteru y burru.jpg
- File:Esteru Comillas.jpg
- File:Carrozaesteru.jpg
Discasto talk 13:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded by 2-upload-user Imanol11 (talk · contributions · Statistics), related File:Nelson john "Aqui y ahora".jpg got deleted per missing permission. Gunnex (talk) 22:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nelioschneider (talk · contribs)
[edit]Reproductions of artworks by living Argentine painter es:Charles Nevott (1944—), still copyrighted without permission via COM:OTRS from Charles Nevott.
Gunnex (talk) 22:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.
Amitie 10g (talk) 22:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously black bordered, uploaded by 1-upload user Yolose (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2011. Gunnex (talk) 22:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samèir Vergara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.
- File:Sandra Vergara 2012.jpg
- File:Samer vergara2014 1.jpg
- File:Samer vergara 2014 4.jpg
- File:Samer Vergara 2014 2.jpg
- File:Samer Vergara.jpg
Amitie 10g (talk) 22:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment Speedied File:Sandra Vergara 2012.jpg as unambiguous copyvio (e.g., here) of celebrity (not a selfie like the others). Эlcobbola talk 22:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Article to this software was 2008 deleted (de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/22._März_2008#BonkEnc_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29) Kopiersperre (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Article to this software was 2008 deleted (de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/22._März_2008#BonkEnc_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29) Kopiersperre (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Article to this software was 2008 deleted (de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/22._März_2008#BonkEnc_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29) Kopiersperre (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:DDF19483 (= among others, 7 copyvios from 2008 uploads detected today) & logs. File:Siviglia-wear-teramo-basket.jpg previously published via (example: here in lower res) http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/8923/palaskgt1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://fantacanestroforum.forumcommunity.net/?t=9572500&st=45&h=172&w=320&tbnid=KqC_VIDMv6-rlM&zoom=1&tbnh=137&tbnw=256&usg=__mN9VGwPmXiOJyd5zG7SYCrHrzGY= (2007, cache, coded due to spam filter) = http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/8923/palaskgt1.jpg (today: 404)
Please delete also
- File:Te.jpg = redirect for File:Night view of the Duomo di Teramo.jpg = deleted per copyvio.
- File:Vir-te.jpg
- File:Interamnia1.jpg
- File:Siviglia-wear-teramo-basket.jpg
- File:Mos leo2.jpg
- File:Delfico.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 23:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 04:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a TV screenshot Ytoyoda (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 04:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 04:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 04:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
no evidence this photo is creative commons Raquel Baranow (talk) 01:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: "Used on many websites" doesn't make an image PD. JurgenNL (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
PNG copy of File:Flag of Ukraine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Subject is also the author of the work, invalid OTRS-permission (there is no permission from the original photographer) Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Don't forget there is a crop of it. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Uh hallo? Deze foto is geheel in mijn beheer en door mij laten maken. Ik heb de volledige rechten. Deze foto wordt gebruikt op de Engelstalige pagina over mij. Dan zul je hem of moeten laten staan, of je moet de hele Engelstalige pagina nomineren voor verwijdering. BVD
Constantia Oomen --ThroughTheWindow (talk) 15:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Aanvulling, zie hier:
http://www.iusmentis.com/auteursrecht/nl/foto/portretrecht/#Portretteninopdracht
"Portretten in opdracht
De wet maakt onderscheid tussen "portretten in opdracht" en "portretten anders dan in opdracht." Bij portretten in opdracht is de basisregel simpel: de geportretteerde mag kopieën maken van het werk, en de maker mag het werk niet zonder toestemming publiceren.
Kopiëren door geportretteerde is geen inbreuk Als iemand een portret laat maken, heeft de maker daarop het auteursrecht. De geportretteerde heeft echter het recht om kopieën te maken van dat portret. De auteurswet bepaalt (artikel 19 lid 1): [...] "
- De maker van deze foto in mijn opdracht is Rien Konings. Ik heb het recht deze foto te gebruiken, want ik heb ervoor betaald. Dus kijk maar: of laten staan, of de Engelse pagina verwijderen. Als die niet weg gaat, kan ik de foto zelf opnieuw uploaden... --ThroughTheWindow (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo mevrouw Oomen,
- Daar ben ik weer om me ermee te bemoeien. Wat u hierboven zegt is niet helemaal een juiste interpretatie van het portretrecht. U heeft gelijk dat dit een in opdracht gemaakt portret betreft (althans, dat wil ik graag aannemen gezien de pose), en dat brengt voor u het recht op verveelvoudiging mee. Echter, dit betekent niet tevens dat u het recht heeft verveelvoudigingen openbaar te maken. Het recht op verveelvoudiging en het recht op openbaarmaking zijn twee in beginsel exclusieve en los van elkaar staande rechten van de maker, en alleen op het verveelvoudigingsrecht wordt door het portretrecht een uitzondering gemaakt. Dit betekent dat u bijvoorbeeld het recht heeft kopieën van de foto in uw familie- of vriendenkring te verspreiden (dit valt niet onder wettelijke definitie van openbaar maken), maar u mag deze foto dus niet zonder toestemming van de rechthebbende op het internet publiceren.
- Dat u betaald heeft voor deze foto maakt dit alles in de regel niet anders, tenzij u met de fotograaf heeft afgesproken dat u het recht heeft op publicatie. Daarvan zal echter wel schriftelijk bewijs moeten worden geleverd.
- Ik begrijp dat dit misschien vreemd klinkt allemaal, maar het is helaas niet anders. Ik hoop dat we kunnen rekenen op uw begrip voor de wettelijke positie waarin wij verkeren.
- Woodcutterty (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Ik heb Rien Konings gemaild met het verzoek, is toch wel zo handig. --ThroughTheWindow (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Invalid OTRS ticket, no new ticket received. The image can be undeleted when there is a valid OTRS ticket. JurgenNL (talk) 08:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Subject is also the author of the work, invalid OTRS-permission (there is no permission from the original photographer) Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
probably a joke? 37.5.2.120 09:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
useless without a description 37.5.2.120 11:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
useless without descriptions - more or less personal files
- File:DSC 1941.JPG
- File:Ahlam Third.jpg
- File:Ahmed El omary New Sokan El Kahf All.jpg
- File:Ahlam shakeya 5.JPG
- File:Ahlam shakeya 4.JPG
- File:Ahlam shakeya 1.JPG
- File:Sokan kahf a elomary new.jpg
- File:Sokan el kahf ahmed elomary 1.jpg
- File:Sokan el kahf new.jpg
37.5.2.120 11:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm going to upload a slightly different higher quality version and don't want the new image to have link baggage.--Agamemnus (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason to delete Krd 16:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Not created by User. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-a1Lqkv8KWU4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAADA/9Fv4U5qKR5I/photo.jpg Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Wurde versehentlich hochgeladen inkl. falscher Lizenz Armstark GmbH (talk) 09:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 16:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" with a watermark from the studio 37.5.2.120 09:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
unused user portraits 37.5.2.120 09:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
superseeded by File:X-or.svg, very low resolution of 24x11 Kopiersperre (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete indeed. This image seemed useful because it was sized properly for in-line text (and documented as such). But I just got the svg to work the same way (and updated its docs accordingly). So there's no advantage to the png that has only that size vs the svg that is also usable in other contexts. DMacks (talk) 23:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 20:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
There is no picture on the flickr source and the flickr account author is not even Kimura Naoki. This is a suspicious upload. Leoboudv (talk) 04:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Maybe the uploader is conected to the flickr account owner https://www.flickr.com/photos/106685085@N07, dont know but username and editing scope in Wikipedia suggest so. Clearly the flickr uploader is not the author. Most likely the file is an unfree web copyvio taken from e.g. http://motomimost888.blogspot.de/2014/04/blog-post.html. Martin H. (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of modern 3D sculpture that is copyrighted by FIFA. The trophy was designed (1971) by Italian artist Silvio Gazzaniga, who is still alive. - Fma12 (talk) 01:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
PNG copy of the Soviet flag. Fry1989 eh? 03:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source, FOTW confirms different image as File:Flag of the Shanghai International Settlement.svg. Fry1989 eh? 04:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by EurekaLott as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Cleveland CSA 2013 v.3.png; not duplicate, but another image format: however jpg generally worse quality than png for such type of images Ankry (talk) 06:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Obs.: high wiki use. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by Musaromana (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 11.2007 the photo was previously published via (example) http://micarrusel.blogia.com/2007/070901-fases-de-la-vida.php (07.2007) = http://micarrusel.blogia.com/upload/20070709114126-anillos.jpg or http://www.1de3.es/2006/08/18/anillos-bodas/ (2006) = http://www.1de3.es/wp-content/uploads/anillos.jpg or grabbed from internet. Gunnex (talk) 07:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This file should be deleted, because it's not owned by piorunus or skyscrapercity.com. On Skyscrapercity.com the picture was linked from the Facebook (as on the forum: https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1/1970489_621812931224202_1966403610_n.jpg). The original owner and maker of this foto is Robert Górny, my friend. I know, because i was there with him. I can tell all the informations about this foto, eg. where it was made, when it was made etc, and of course provide original photo, even few more from this place. And here's link from facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=621812931224202&set=o.341617835928928&type=3&theater KlimaIno (talk) 07:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Uploading this picture I relied on information provided by piorunus. I've sent a message to piorunus at ssc to ask again if he has any rights to this photo. If he's not the copyright holder I will agree that file should be deleted. If so - I will be very sorry for using this picture :/ --Jjajjo (talk) 10:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Dicksee-Passion-1892.jpg. Painting by Frank Dicksee entitled Passion; no connection with sh:Mahidevran Gülbahar. Delete as duplicate, and don't replace in the article that uses it.
What's going on anyway? There's a number of accounts with user names ending in digits who keep uploading random images claiming they showed some Ottoman female rulers. Sometimes correctly, but often incorrectly. Last one was Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malhub Baharaj (mahidevran 2014-06-21 20-32.jpg. Lupo 08:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, cropped. Uploaded by XPsique (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 12.2012, the photo in its orginal frame was previously published via http://diariodecronicasnoanunciadas.blogspot.de/2012/07/entrevista-con.html (07.2012) = http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rMeV51SOd3A/T_iK2Sz-fyI/AAAAAAAAATo/I9W_6SxHoF0/s1600/5.jpg, watermarked with http://www.culturaclick.com which is (today) configured with "Copyright © 2014 Culturaclick, Todos los Derechos Reservados". On same day, the user uploaded also the related file File:Miranda al recibir la noticia.jpg, deleted per copyvio.
PS: If closed as deleted, please delete also the redirect File:MirandaylaSoulBand.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work. Vantey (talk) 09:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This is either a personal image from uploader's blog or an unlicensed/non-free image from a website. Editor has had many articles about non-notable/spammish blog/bloggers deleted, I don't remember which part of that pile was related to this image. License-fail? Unused personal? No use except for promotional content? So many COM:SCOPE fails. DMacks (talk) 10:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, cropped. Uploaded by eswiki-based, 1-upload-user Centerblad (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 07.2009, the photo is most likely a promo shot by producer en:Babybjörn, a Swedish family-owned company specializing in the manufacturing and marketing of baby products The file is most likely cropped from an Amazon offer (available since 12.2007) via http://www.amazon.de/Babybj%C3%B6rn-023078-Tragesitz-Original-passion/dp/B001ET6P5K = http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/612SvSa-+AS._SL1100_.jpg (last modified: 10.2008) or (smaller res) http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41sN0ZOYKoL.jpg (last modified: 09.2008) or was grabbed from Internet. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 10:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am allowed to use this photo, since the owner of it is Baby Björn AB has appointed us as distributors of their brand in Spain and Portugal. I have chosen a photo where the logo is not very visible in order to illustrate the article. Best regards, Michael Centerblad— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.170.97.230 (talk • contribs)
- Please contact Baby Björn AB to send a permission via COM:OTRS indicating that this photo is freely licensed according to COM:L. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
The Category:Kia Forte Koup XK is here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chu (talk • contribs) 2014-06-30T10:04:54 (UTC)
- Categories should be deleted via Commons:Categories for discussion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: empty . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work". Here's a version of 2009 http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/vodafone-will-answer-any-query-on-hutch/article1653573.ece 37.5.2.120 10:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. The uploader added some (self) licenses later. But these does not apply as the author seems to be pt:Joaquim Baptista Roque who died in 1995. JuTa 10:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Article de:Luxury lifestyle awards deleted. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Article de:Luxury lifestyle awards deleted. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Klostergasse 2 (Heilbronn)
[edit]Apparently the source that was given for these images was not correct (see image talk pages). Without a correct source and without any information about the date and author of the images, we have to assume they might still be copyrighted. They should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Heilbronn, Haus der Weinhändler Lang-Schöllkopf, Klostergasse 2, Plastik eines Löwen, der in der rechten Tatze einen kleinen Mädchenkopf hält, geschaffen 11. bis. 12.Jhdt, Ausschnitt mit dem Mädchenkopf.jpg
- File:Heilbronn, Haus der Weinhändler Lang-Schöllkopf, Klostergasse 2, Plastik eines Löwen, der in der rechten Tatze einen kleinen Mädchenkopf hält, geschaffen 11. bis. 12.Jhdt, Ausschnitt.jpg
- File:Heilbronn, Haus der Weinhändler Lang-Schöllkopf, Klostergasse 2, Plastik eines Löwen, der in der rechten Tatze einen kleinen Mädchenkopf hält, geschaffen 11. bis. 12.Jhdt.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry. This work cannot be accepted. Unfortunately the author of the photo seems unknown (in Polish: autor nieznany), so this would be a case of "orphan work" 46.112.15.17 20:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Reported for copyright violation because it is a copy of File:Franciszek Młudzik.jpg.png which was deleted just hours before this image was uploaded. See this page for original. Green Giant (talk) 12:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, as a copyright violation by NahidSultan at 15:28, 8 July 2014
Files of Latvian National Museum of Art
[edit]- File:Aleksandrs Drēviņš - Woman with Leaflets - Google Art Project.jpg
- File:Gustavs_Klucis_-_Construction_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Gustavs_Klucis_-_Under_the_banner_of_Lenin_for_socialist_construction_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Gustavs_Klucis_-_USSR_–_shock_brigade_of_the_world_proletariat_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Janis Rozentāls - After Church - Google Art Project.jpg
- File:Janis_Rozentāls_-_Mother_and_Child_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Janis_Rozentāls_-_The_Painter’s_Studio_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Janis_Rozentāls_-_The_Princess_and_the_Monkey_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Janis_Rozentāls_-_Under_the_Rowan_Tree_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Johans_Valters_-_Boys_Bathing_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Johans_Valters_-_Ducks_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Johans_Valters_-_Expressive_firs_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
- File:Johans_Valters_-_Forest_(Morning_Sun)_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
I am writing on behalf of Latvian National Museum of Art. This file must be deleted, because it is downloaded illegally from our Google Art Project account/profile:http://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/collection/national-museum-latvia?projectId=art-project and uploaded in this website illegally. We have ownership for this file and according to our agreement with According to our agreement background with GOOGLE „(F.(...)Google will not(...)(3)offer any features that enable users to download the High/Medium Resolution Images from Google products or services”s. That means files are downloaded illegally from our account in GoogeArtProject and uploaded here.According to the fact that WikimediaCommons allows dowload all sizes of this file, we have already found companies who are using these files for printed canvas without any agreement with our institution.Please update me about this situation: annija.sauka@lnmm.lv --Annija Sauka Latvian National Museum of Art Communication department
- Note that I have removed DR tags and closed individual DRs where the images are long out of copyright as the museum can't claim any copyright on these. I have left those open where authors died in the 1940s. Some closed DRs been removed from the list here. The Janis Rozentāls images should probably be removed as well (died 1915, published in 1890s to 1900s). --Denniss (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept All of these artists died before 1940, so all are PD in Latvia which is now pma 70. It was pma 50 until 2000, so they also were PD on the URAA date. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 11:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, not a valid reasoning. Purvitis before 1916 is PD.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 11:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, not a valid reasoning. Purvitis before 1916 is PD.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
useless without a description 37.5.2.120 11:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Author died 1939, therefore PD . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
A golden shoe looks like a sculptural work. In that case, it shouldn't be on Commons. Stefan4 (talk) 12:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Author died 1940 -- PD . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. File is obtained illegally and is ownership of Latvian National Museum of Art. 81.198.70.52 12:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Misleading image K6ka (talk | contribs) 13:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't know about misleading, but it is out of scope as a personal image. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
IMO, The copyright of the image remains with the artist; not with the purchaser of the artifact in case of 2D art. Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, but this painting is a copy of a copy of a copy. I would question, if there is enough creative originality to put it under copyright. The merit of the artist is the diligence he used to make this copy. For this diligence I have paid the money. IMHO. --ArishG (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copies have copyrights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
according source unknown author made in 1967 in Canada. The given license {{Attribution}} oes not make real sense here. JuTa 13:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
clearly Selfie Kopiersperre (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
That does not look like own work as stated (1930 post card) nor its ol enogh for a clear {{PD-old}} or similar. JuTa 13:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- L'autorisation Old due à une carte postale ancienne est la bonne, c'est l'atribution à Garitan comme auteur qui est erroné, désolé pour cette erreure.Garitan (talk) 13:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: 1930 is 45 years too recent to assume that it is PD-old. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
No FOP for post-1978 artworks in the USA. This was unveiled for the 1st time in Palo Alto, after 1982, although this is the NY copy, unveiled in 1992. See nycgovparks.org and SIRIS
Teofilo (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Since there were multiple copies made and made available to the public, that probably counts as "published" in post-1978 law, and since copies were put up before March 1 1989 (1984 in Palo Alto), they would need a valid copyright notice on them. I'm not sure the SIRIS description is enough to determine that though. Do these statues have any inscriptions on them at all? Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Has a member of the general public who wants to buy a copy been given an opportunity to order a third copy ? Was it proposed in a gallery ? In an auction ? Lupo says (between 1978 and 1989) "Sculpture remains "unpublished" unless copies are sold, lent, etc. to the general public." : Template_talk:PD-US-statue/proposal#Need for a bright-line rule. Teofilo (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- It was offered to others for purposes of public display. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Has a member of the general public who wants to buy a copy been given an opportunity to order a third copy ? Was it proposed in a gallery ? In an auction ? Lupo says (between 1978 and 1989) "Sculpture remains "unpublished" unless copies are sold, lent, etc. to the general public." : Template_talk:PD-US-statue/proposal#Need for a bright-line rule. Teofilo (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- A new Copyrigth for each Copy of a Sculpture? Others as a reprint of a Book? --Fg68at de:Disk 11:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- See COM:FOP#United States : unlike countries like Austria or Germany, the United States don't have Panoramafreiheit for sculptures. Teofilo (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Relisting item from Nov 2008 -- was never closed.
Kept. Per Carl Lindberg. –Tryphon☂ 14:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
this artwork is dated from 1992. i fear that it might not be able to be housed on Commons :( (see Gay Liberation Monument Sarah (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- There are more pieces of the same work, 1984 in Palo Alto, so one copy is put up before March 1 1989.
- In NY: community and design approvals by 1982, but public opposition etc, therefore put up 1992 in NY.
- Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Gay Liberation Monument-New York City-2006.jpg
- --Fg68at de:Disk 00:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Palo Alto: https://www.flickr.com/photos/taylar/2678709239/in/photostream/
- George Segal's Gay Liberation
- --Fg68at de:Disk 00:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I believe that this photo should be deleted because its unlikely to be used for educational purposes. The image is blurry and there are better images on commons that illustrate the platform. (see: File:MRT-3_Ortigas_Station_Platform_2.jpg) The file is currently not in use on any project. Mike V • Talk 17:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete I am just a transferrer of tagged images for transfer from wikipedia to commons so if the image is deemed to be deleted due to reasons stated above, I have no contests and let it be done. PhilippineRevolution (talk) 01:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Artistic rendition of Benedict Cumberbatch describing his utter lack of friends, 2014.jpg
[edit]
user didn't take this image herself; nor did she upload it for it to be used in an article Lady Lotus (talk) 17:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because the uploader admits in the description that they used a "freely licensed" Flickr image as a source but in fact that image was released under CC BY-ND 2.0 which is unacceptable for Commons. Green Giant (talk) 11:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't know what this screenshot depicts, but unless we know that the program or website has a Commons-compatible license, we can't retain it. If we don't know what it is, we also can't use it, so it's not in scope. If you demonstrate that it's a freely licensed program or website, I'll happily withdraw. Nyttend (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete without a context and a clearer description, there is little educational use per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 11:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Does this have any use whatsoever? The description looks like a test, as if the uploader just typed random characters. This is apparently different from what was deleted in the first DR for a file of this name. Nyttend (talk) 11:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
PS, closing administrator, please protect the title from recreation; it's too generic. Nyttend (talk) 11:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 21:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Vanity, out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep because customarily users are allowed a small number of images of themselves for use on userpages. This image is being used on their no-wiki userpage and is the earliest file in their uploads. Green Giant (talk) 11:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Vanity, out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because it is an unused personal photo (although users are customarily allowed to upload a small number of images of themselves). Green Giant (talk) 11:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Vanity, out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Although users are customarily allowed to upload a small number of images of themselves, the no-wiki userpage where this image is being used appears to be a vanity page. This person appears to regard Commons as a sort of Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 12:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Vanity, out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Although users are customarily allowed to upload a small number of images of themselves, the no-wiki userpage where this image is being used appears to be a vanity page. This person appears to regard Commons as a sort of Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Vanity, out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because it is an unused personal photo (although users are customarily allowed to upload a small number of images of themselves). Green Giant (talk) 11:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 12:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Commons is not Facebook. Green Giant (talk) 12:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and because this appears to be an identifiable minor who may not have fully understood the consequences of releasing a personal image on the net, especially the personal details in the filename. Green Giant (talk) 12:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.michelbureau.com/visualiser_photo.php?categ=51&id=773&recherche=true
Converted by me to DR, as the file has been on Commons since 2008 and as the original wording does not sound blatantly incredible. However, a formal permission is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because the link given by Lomita contains the words "Toutes reproductions interdites sauf entente préalable" which means that "all reproduction forbidden without prior agreement". I would support a delayed deletion if someone wants to contact the copyright holder and see if they want to give formal permission via the OTteRS. Green Giant (talk) 12:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously released copyrighted in http://foros.vogue.es/viewtopic.php?t=72024&start=286 Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is an obvious copyvio. It was uploaded after published in the web. File name is the same one that in the web. LMLM (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously released copyrighted in http://foros.vogue.es/viewtopic.php?t=72024&start=286 Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is an obvious copyvio. It was uploaded after published in the web. File name is the same one that in the web. LMLM (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously released copyrighted in http://foros.vogue.es/viewtopic.php?t=72024&start=286 Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is an obvious copyvio. It was uploaded after published in the web. File name is the same one that in the web. LMLM (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
License claims "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, The Flag Institute." while it says nothing about the flag being public domain at the source. Additionally, the webpage at the source claims "© 2013 The Flag Institute. All Rights Reserved." Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Yes, the licensing tagg is incorrect. However this desing is a couple of hundred years old and is out of copyright which maes the flag pd. The source version doesn't contain enough creative elements to make it eligible for copyright imo. And yes, this appears to be the original desing. Natuur12 (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
resolution too low for usage (448 × 143 Pixel) Kopiersperre (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
not in use nor notable people so personal photo, out of scope Ezarateesteban 13:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
out of scope, not in use and not educational purpose Ezarateesteban 13:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Both notes are wrong: It is neither published "without a copyright notice", nor "with a defective copyright notice", since only the year is missing. (How could both notes be true anyway?) 94.220.234.126 14:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The photo doesn't fit either of the copyright licenses that were added by the uploader and should be deleted. We hope (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This is an old, low-res screenshot from the Atlas of Mutual Heritage with obsolete source reference. The image has since been exported from the same database in a better resolution: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AMH-6775-KB_Siege_of_Batavia_by_the_sultan_of_Mataram.jpg Gerritdeveer1597 (talk) 14:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Havang(nl) as Copyvio and the most recent rationale was: L'artiste Jean-Yves Lechevallier, auteur de la fontaine, n'a pas donné sa permission, donc la Licence donné sur Flicr n'est pas valide. JuTa 15:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alinea as Copyvio and the most recent rationale was: No valid source of photographer JuTa 15:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged with {{No permission}} by me. The uploader then added a link to http://www.gahetna.nl/over-ons/open-data. The page indeed states that a large part of their files are either licensed CC-BY-SA or in the public domain (Een groot deel van dit materiaal is beschikbaar als open data met een open licentie of verklaring.). However, those files are clearly marked as such in their meta data (see green circle next to the example picture at the same page). This files metadata however does not contain any information about its copyright status: no CC-BY-SA, no Public Domain, nothing → unfortunately, we can't keep it, imho. El Grafo (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No license shown on the image page in www.gahetna.nl. Unlike two other, black-and-white pictures of this band in the same archiv. Ankry (talk) 11:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree, this file isn't free. The other two files are free though, so I'll upload those instead. Trijnsteltalk 16:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Info @Trijnstel: At least one of them is already uploaded here. Ankry (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed. I've now uploaded the other one too. All files can now be found here. Plus I think it's also wise to look at the uploads of Cynthiapinto123 on enWP (here) since some are duplicates (I marked a few), some can be transferred to Commons and others should be deleted there too maybe? Trijnsteltalk 17:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This appears to be an image of Oscar Wilde, not Nestor Makhno. MisterDub (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per this book cover about the Makhnovist movement. I can see the apparent resemblance but I think it is definitely Makhno. Green Giant (talk) 11:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Perfect! Thanks for verifying! MisterDub (talk) 13:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn Natuur12 (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
File:This is Jamie Yendall an fab kid who helps out at match-borough first school also got a Facebook acc and msp he is cute 2014-06-30 15-33.jpg
[edit]
No perceived educational use of shot - see COM:NOTHOST, COM:NOTSOCIAL Tabercil (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Commons is not that kind of social media. Green Giant (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image out of project scope. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Vanity, out of scope Blue Elf (talk) 18:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because although users are customarily allowed to upload a small number of images of themselves, this image is only being used to decorate talkpages. Green Giant (talk) 11:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
falsche Bezeichnung - wrong title Knarf esileannahojaerdna (talk) 23:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valdi reason for deletion please see com:rename Natuur12 (talk) 09:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
falsche Bezeichnung - wrong title Knarf esileannahojaerdna (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valdi reason for deletion please see com:rename Natuur12 (talk) 09:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copy of File:Ernst August Herzog zu Braunschweig.jpg (earlier uploaded) Kopiersperre (talk) 23:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Also uploaded by the same user as fair use to w:File:The Shackshakers (2013).jpg. The fair use rationale suggests that this is own work by the uploader, but there seem to be several hits on Google. OTRS needed. Stefan4 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LX as no source. I added a found souce http://quoteko.com/bahadur-singh-baral.html, but was not accepted by him. JuTa 14:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh for crying out loud. As I stated in the edit summary, Quoteko is hotlinking the image from Commons. Anyone who has spent two minutes working with Google Image Search on Commons images knows that's what they do. One can't upload an image to Commons with no source, wait for it to be picked up by a mirror site, and then claim that as the original source... And even if you think that's okay, there's absolutely nothing at that source to help verify the claim that this is a public domain work by the UK Government. For the record, I I wasn't the one to tag it as no source. That was done by Ankry following Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JasonStack43. How much time are we going to waste on this obviously unsourced and mistagged upload by a sockpuppeteering serial copyright violator? —LX (talk, contribs) 15:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: None. com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 22:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before July 7, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 23:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
the bridge takes big part of the photo, is unfree and there are no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. --BaseSat (talk) 18:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment Do bridges have copyrights in Ukraine? They do not in many places, including the United States. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: We need some evidence that there is an exception for bridges in the Ukraine. Natuur12 (talk) 22:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before July 7, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 23:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously released copyrighted in http://foros.vogue.es/viewtopic.php?t=72024&start=286 Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Files have been here since 2007 so they should face a regular DR imho. Natuur12 (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is an obvious copyvio. It was uploaded after published in the web with the same file name that in the web. LMLM (talk) 07:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion; if this is an error, send an otrs request Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hungarikusz Firkász as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nincs forrás arra, hogy mikor hozták először nyilvánosságra a képet. Az jóval később is történhetett. Így nem bizonyított, hogy közkincs. JuTa 15:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
[A Krémer gyerekek fiatal koruk ellenére már gyakorlott színészeknek számítanak, mert születésüktől fogva a színpadon nőnek, és lépnek fel. - this sentence from User talk:Hungarikusz Firkász#File:Krémer Ferenc.jpg] Krémer Ferenc születésétől kezdve színházi közegben élt. 1918-ig az édesapja (Krémer Sándor) társulatának környezetében, majd a nevelőapa, Szabadkay József színigazgató társulatának tagjaival együtt éli a színészgyermek életét Szatmárnémetiben, ami azt jelenti, hogy iskolai szünetek idején ő is fel-fel lép, és utazik a társulattal. Krémer Ferenc három színi évadon át, 1920-1921-ben, 1921-1922-ben, 1923-1924-ben, tagja a Szabadkay József, majd 1925-1926-ban a Szendrey Mihály vezette szatmárnémeti színháznak. Színészi pályájának első négy esztendejét tehát Szatmárnémetiben tölti. Nem egészen értem, egy népszerű színész fényképét miért kellene rejtegetni 1944-ig? Tambo (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- The Kremer children despite their young age counted as experienced actors because since birth they grew on stage and made appearances. Ferenc Krémer lived since birth in a theatre environment. Until 1918 he lived the life of an actor child in Szatmárnémeti (Satu Mare) in the environment of his father's (Sándor Krémer) theatre company, then with the members of the company of his foster-father, the theatre director József Szabadkay, which means that during school holidays he made appearances and travelled with the company. Ferenc Krémer was a member of József Szabadkay's company during three theatre seasons, 1920-1921, 1921-1922 and 1923-1924, and then in 1925-1926 of the Satu Mare theatre directed by Mihály Szendrey. So he spent the first four years of his theatre career in Satu Mare.
- I do not quite understand why a photograph of a well-known and popular actor would be hidden until 1944? Tambo (talk) 05:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- (English translation of the Hungarian above a bit improved Oliv0 (talk) 14:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC))
1923. október 27-én indul útjára Szatmárnémetiben a "Színház és Művészetek" című szépirodalmi hetilap. A lap főmunkatársa: Krémer Ferenc. A kép már itt is megjelenhetett. Nem valószínű, hogy rejtegették 1944 utánig, hogy jogellenes legyen. Tambo (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- On 27 October 1923 the literary magazine "Theatre and Arts" was launched in Satu Mare. Ferenc Krémer was senior associate. The image may already have been published there. It's unlikely that the picture had been hidden until after 1944 so that now it would be illicit. Tambo (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- (English translation of the Hungarian above a bit improved Oliv0 (talk) 14:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC))
The uploader assumptions engage in a particular, whether the image was first published in the 1920s. Neither this nor any other date, there is no evidence, so the image can not be considered in the public domain. This would persist as long as there is no concrete evidence for the previous 70 years of the first publication, or until it turns out that the author (currently unknown) actually died 70 years earlier. Guessing not be based on copyright and the public domain qualification. (Reversed by Google Translate version) Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Én nem írtam sehol, hogy a kép megjelent az 1920-as években. Azt írtam, hogy valószínűleg akkor készült. Tambo (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- I have not written anywhere that the image was published in the 1920s. I wrote that it was probably made circa that time. Tambo (talk) 07:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- (English translation of the Hungarian above a bit improved Oliv0 (talk) 14:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC))
Nem tudom, hogy itt milyen szigorúan szokták venni, hogy bizonyítani kell a nyilvánosságra hozatal évét és nem kikövetkeztetni abból, hogy profi kép ismert színészről. Így csak annyit tudok mondani, hogy inkább magyarul írjátok a fentieket az angol helyett, érthetőbb lesz és még lefordítani is könnyebb lesz. / May I suggest to write the above in Hungarian instead of English, it will be easier to understand and even to translate to English. Oliv0 (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ha nem lehet tudni az első közlés idejének dátumát, akkor, szerinted, mi alapján tekinthető közkincsnek olyan értelemben, hogy az első közlés régebben volt mint 70 éve? Hasra ütésre? Vagy az alapján, hogy Tambo úgy gondolja? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Sajnos én sem látom bizonyítottnak, hogy mikor hozták nyilvánosságra a képet. A jobb alsó sarkában találtam egy vízjelet "Schnitzer művészi fényképész..." szöveggel, de évszám nincs benne. (Így viszont a szerző nem is biztos, hogy ismeretlen.) Esetleg meg lehetne kérdezni a Színészkönyvtár.hu-t. --Rlevente (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Akkor ez más és az egész attól függ, hogy ki az a Schnitzer és mikor halt meg. Oliv0 (talk) 14:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Szerintem az van odaírva, hogy Schnilzer művészi fényképész. A Google ezeket a találatokat hozza erre. Ugyanaz a keresés Schnitzerre. Itt említenek egy J. Schnitzert (az enwiki cikke szerint Joseph Schnitzer), de nem tudom, hogy azonos-e a képen szereplővel, ha az valóban Schnitzer. Azonban ha nem derül ki, hogy ki ez a Schnitzer, akkor a kép továbbra is törlendő, mivel nincs sem hiteles, sem semmilyen más forrás arra, hogy 70 évnél régebben publikálták a képet. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sajnos ez vonatkozik a kategóriában lévő többi képre is. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Felvettem a kapcsolatot a Színészkönyvtárral. Remélem, tudnak segíteni eldönteni. Tambo (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: I find no clear evidence of copyvio, and discussion did not reveal one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
The OTRS ticket ([1]) is for a category of paintings, and makes no reference to this photograph. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- The pictures are from her and where sent to me. I will write to her about clarification. please hold off on deletion. Mdupont (talk) 23:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Mdupont: Is there any update? I cannot find any new OTRS ticket for the photograph. --Krd 14:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: When/if OTRS received, image may be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
