Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 28th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-GermanGov does not apply. Possibly usable under other PD-...Gov licence? Krd 08:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Widthdrawn. --Krd 09:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader (User:Lingonn84) is the copyright holder (hosmich), in which case it is being used here without attribution. Source appears to be hosmich.deviantart.com, licensed with unacceptable (non-commercial) CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. – Wdchk (talk) 17:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedy deleted per nomination. Krd 19:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serial copyright violator; appears to be a scan of a third-party publication. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I blocked Giada back in November, and then unblocked following an email conversation where they promised not to upload anything. I wasn't paying attention, the user never changed. I have nuked their uploads and indefed. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giada Marini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations.

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Accidental DR, I meant to just plain delete. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not created by user. Previously published http://www.contactmusic.com/photo/j-alvarez-latin-billboard-awards-2014-red-carpet_4168083 Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infringement of copyright. Meysam (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a personal web site Civa (talk) 06:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scopě Lenka64 (talk) 12:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 20:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Błędnie nazwany plik. Kedzio89r (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 20:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dulbie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:otrs needed McZusatz (talk) 20:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:PS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:PS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:17, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:17, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the first find photograph, I find it doubtful the stuffed penguins are copyrightable since these aren't exaggerate, fanciful designs, but reasonably closely resemble nature, which is generally regarded as one of the criteria for copyrightability [1]. As for the nerf gun in the photo, I defer to other experts, though we should be sure to apply consistent principles e.g. to some of the pictures in Category:Water guns.--Eloquence (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The gun looks like the situation in User:Elcobbola/Models; that is, a copyrighted artwork. The fact that there are pictures in Category:Water guns does not mean anything as there are plenty of categories which are full of copyright violations.
The penguins seem to look quite different to the images in w:Penguin, so your assessment looks uncertain.
The source country of the toys is unknown. Since the source country is unknown, the copyright status in the source country of the toys is also unknown. For what it is worth, the source country may have laws similar to those described in this court ruling. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Stefan4: , thank you for linking that court case, it looks interesting. Do you happen to know if it's been summarized, e.g. in a newspaper, blog post, etc. (regardless of language, I'm fine with reading French or using Google Translate)? I have skimmed through it, but if a summary exists it would make it easier for me (and maybe others) to absorb. -Pete F (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Short summary: Getty Images France hosted some pictures of two different chair models on its website. It was found that these photographs infringed the copyright to the chair models, and Getty Images France was fined for this. For pictures of the chair models, make a Google Images search for "LC2" (a fauteuil) and "LC4" (a chaise longue). --Stefan4 (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The piñata in the second photo seems to be copyrightable, if it can be compared to a container (a useful article) with a copyrighted design on the outside (also, the shape is likely not utilitarian.)
As far as the first photo, there might be a utilitarian aspect to the Nerf gun if it is able to fire foam projectiles, though it may happen where a "foam projectile launcher" (a useful article) may simultaneously have artistic aspects on the outside; i.e. if it is designed to resemble a real gun in shape or overall appearance. A non-artistic functional spray bottle would likely be a useful article, but a squirt gun might be comparable to a spray bottle combined with artistic aspects on the outside to make it resemble an actual gun. (This article, which I have used as a reference in the COM:DW guide, may be of interest; it mentions a case of toy stunt plane launchers being considered a useful article (for launching objects) as opposed to a toy airplane being an artistic work that merely depicts the appearance of an airplane (and is therefore copyrightable.)) --Gazebo (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That might affect the copyright status in the United States. However, it still doesn't say anything about the copyright status in the source country, since the source country is unknown. See for example the case above where the French supreme court fined Getty for hosting photographs of chairs in violation of the copyright of the chairs. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Can not be kept per com:PRP. McZusatz (talk) 20:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image. See COM:PS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of an artist without an article on any wiki. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abcd520 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images; out of COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tjalexforever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope (unused personal photos).

XXN, 19:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is spam 太刻薄 (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mourad.mouhamdi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jason554626 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like advertisement. Category:Neckties contains images of better quality.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 奶牛族 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Galoubalou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wilses (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raiden2291 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. Fry1989 eh? 00:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - see w:Kunwer Azlan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I don't need it.--Mischa004 (talk) 09:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:24, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:24, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted model/artistic sculpture Gazebo (talk) 05:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a personal web site Civa (talk) 07:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like a personal, unused image. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work appears dubious to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:29, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonard Cohen (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  • File:Bardavío.jpg --> source: "My computer + I have permission" (from whom?) --> unlikely to be own work, most likely scanned from somewhere
  • File:Laberintos.jpg (magazine cover) --> permission from "Julio García Caparrós" via COM:OTRS needed. Sourced with a random blog maintained by "Luis Miguel Ortego".

Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engoman23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded in 2008. Unlikely to be own works: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Engoman23 and (e.g.) Commons:Deletion requests/File:LANA HIDRÓFUGA2.JPG = "All of the uploader's images are quite obviously scanned from some catalog or company brochure, and very unlikely to be "own work" as claimed." Most likely all files taken from http://www.rockwool.com or similar sites, like File:HISTORIA LANA.jpg (cropped, available in its original version via http://www.rockwool.com/files/COM2011/About-Rockwool-Group/Our-company/RockwoolGroup_History_2003_EN.pdf, page 5, may be in PD but relevant info must be provided). File:Lana de roca incombustible A1.jpg previously published via (example) http://www.integral.net.pl/index.php?id=welna = http://www.integral.net.pl/welna_mineralna.jpg (last modified: 2006), etc.

Gunnex (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

In each case, the image infringes on the copyright belonging to the creator of the work.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bears a © notice. Would need evidence of non-renewal by Universal Pictures. Lupo 13:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no publication info. Copyright status unknown. Lupo 13:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image showing an empty classroom with some random people in the end. Does not provide value to Commons. Mippzon (talk) 15:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope Mippzon (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Иг22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images have wrong permissions. Modern images are not in PD or CC, older images may be not free yet.

Anatoliy (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the picture Ilya Ehrenburg personally? Are you liar? Soviet Union does not exist 23 year, it exists only in your imagination.
I am not a liar. On this picture is not Ilya Ehrenburg personally, but a work but Ilya Ehrenburg personally. A picture of Ilya Ehrenburg may be in public domain, while a work of Ilya Ehrenburg cannot — NickK (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kata12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Kata12. Uploaded on 15.04.2009 (both files are identical, highest res: 717x538px), the photo was published 2 month later via https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=38306816&postcount=1145 (06.2009, by LUIXIVIADO), embedded from http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj82/partykoolture/CTG2029-1.jpg (last modified: 10.2008, higher res, identical exif) from Photobucket user "partykoolture".

Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope. Sealle (talk) 18:29, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is indeed not the uploader's own work but this at times inadvertent claim is a typical problem of users who attempt to upload their first files to Commons. This logo is not eligible for copyright at least according to US law as it consists of typefaces and a simple geometric figure only, hence {{PD-textlogo}} would apply. However, this looks to me like an accidental upload. Shortly after the uploading user inserted this logo, File:Samsung card logo.jpg another logo was uploaded and inserted as replacement. I am deleting this not out of copyright concerns but as being out of COM:SCOPE, i.e. it is currently unused, appears to be an accidental upload, is in the JPG format which is not suitable for logos, is of far too small resolution for a non-scalable format, and should be better derived from this SVG logo. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file contains only of Koran text. 117.79.232.239 02:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: And how does this constitute a problem? AFBorchert (talk) 06:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted models shown

Gazebo (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted artwork/logos shown

Gazebo (talk) 05:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prominent display of the copyrighted Comic-Con logo

Gazebo (talk) 05:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


First set deleted: Per COM:CB#Comic and action figures and COM:FAN. AFBorchert (talk) 06:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I kept two depictions of logos below the COM:TOO#threshold of originality in the second set and deleted the others as derived work. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The first two pictures of the third set were deleted as derived works of a logo which appears to be eligible for copyright. The last one kept thanks to the crop done by Sven Manguard. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, not in project scope. — Racconish ✉ 05:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Indeed, appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 06:42, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to bad image-quality (unfocussed). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder 37.5.2.120 05:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I don't think unused and unexplained montages are in scope. Aside from that, while all of the images are from Commons, they do not all have the same license and according to our policy, they must have attributions in the montage's description -- not just links to the image pages. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 37.5.2.120 06:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; Unclear description ; Generic file name Civa (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a personal web site Civa (talk) 06:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 37.5.2.120 07:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corresponds to an older version of File:Web development timeline.png, naemly this one: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/e/e4/20081208222101!Web_development_timeline.png . Torsch (talk) 07:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK --FML hello 07:40, 28 June 2014 (UTC)--177.194.39.245 07:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a personal web site Civa (talk) 07:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a personal web site Civa (talk) 07:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, no description, no usage, low quality. Tine (talk) 07:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VíctorMGarcia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files from the website playthe.net. OTRS tickets needed, if in scope

37.5.2.120 07:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Image also published (at higher resolution) here: http://www.sanmartinadiario.com.ar/rss/3868-promocionan-la-feria-de-aves-de-sudamerica-en-inglaterra.html

MPF (talk) 08:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Шодим95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A collection of copyright violations and derivative works, all claimed as own works

37.5.2.120 08:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 37.5.2.120 08:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.2.120 08:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A modern portrait fantasy. No reason to believe the author died more than 70 years ago, as the license claims. Ghirlandajo (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 37.5.2.120 08:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original building (or original creation) until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. Civa (talk) 09:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France, unfortunately. The image of the building is protected. Eusebius (talk) 09:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anytsirk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Posters without OTRS tickets

37.5.2.120 09:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. This image infringes on the architect's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 14:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaneijkz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

useless without descriptons

37.5.2.120 10:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This ticket is not uploaders to relicense. The image is owned by the transit company that the ticket is for. TLSuda (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploaders to relicense. Image belongs to the transit company. TLSuda (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, not "own work". Taken from this this La Presse article which is "© La Presse, ltée. Tous droits réservés." bobrayner (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation; this photo has been going round internet forums for years. Example. "Own work" is unlikely, for a publicity photo taken on an Iranian airbase. bobrayner (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created in error as a duplicate of File:FundaPayan01.JPG CeeGee (talk) 12:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 14:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 12:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by mistake. Correct version is "Stockholm C commuter train 140624 01.jpg", this one should be deleted. Tomiwoj (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 14:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Using Google Map background. New image "Taby kyrkby station.jpg" exists. This one should be deleted. Tomiwoj (talk) 12:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 14:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Using Google Maps background. New image "Nasby alle station.jpg" exists. This one can be deleted. Tomiwoj (talk) 12:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 14:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free to use. The artist died 1989. AHA2 (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The artist died 1989 AHA2 (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The artist died 1989 AHA2 (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 37.5.2.120 15:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this file. I do not own the copyrights of this picture and would not like to breach the rules of Wikimedia Commons. This is why I am nominating it for deletion. Please delete this file. Inlandmamba (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 14:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope Mippzon (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry image of a goat. No value to Commons due to poor quality. Mippzon (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.ancestry-si.de/pictures/silesia/2002-Schalkowitz-Kirche-02.jpg uploaded in 2002, all rights reserved Sealle (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as personal shot of likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Testing upload from android app.jpg
I just uploaded this using the Android app. I was not asked about the educational purpose of the file. I was given no guidance on what file name to choose, or how to describe the file; I was informed, without any contextual information, that "this image will be licensed under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0"; I was asked nothing about whether the image was in the public domain or freely licensed, about whether I owned the copyright to the photo and its contents, or if I wished to choose a different license. All of this stands in strong contrast to the carefully considered design of Special:UploadWizard. It didn't even auto-fill the date of the photo. -Pete F (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Although it's possible this file could be put to educational use, it would need a better file name, a better description, and some categories for that to be realistic. All of that requires information that the uploader failed to provide, the file is not worth the trouble. As an aside, it would be nice if there was not software being actively distributed that gives no instruction whatsoever to uploaders about file names, licenses, or how to create useful descriptions. See the image included at right. -Pete F (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunitbajgal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - 4 unused personal images & 2 unused promo images

INeverCry 20:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per INC. Yann (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunitbajgal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal unused images, out of Commons:Project scope

Justass (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wade,kejroejdjerjejwskkaajaasdeklakllsksskwwklwwkklwwoowajmmaqolwwwaSklwwkwsdEkek,swoops,wwW,,was s all,as. Alokkjejwkkwwww 108.54.170.107 20:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense Krd 14:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another asshole AzaToth 00:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Courcelles (talk) 01:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renomination #1

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of metadata and low resolution make me suspect a copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. --Krd 16:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo, COM:NOPENIS. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

indecent picture and I want it removed Coli14 (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zostało dodane zdjęcie lepiej przedstawiające dane gniazdo bociana białego. Kedzio89r (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. But I deleted only the first version, uploaded by nominator, not the other version. Taivo (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person in the picture, Joanna Cassidy, this image harms my public image and I would like it taken down. Thank you. Joannacassidy (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why we should delete a freely licensed image. I fail to identify any harm done to the depicted person. --Denniss (talk) 14:33, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Denniss: , isn't it a little unkind to ask for an explanation that would not likely make any difference? Pete F (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This photo is in use in articles in over a dozen different language editions of Wikipedia. If there were a legal problem with the file (for instance, a violation of the photographer's copyright, or of the subject's personality rights), that wouldn't matter, and we could delete it. But there's not: the photographer is a professional who's been in touch with our support team (OTRS), and has contributed hundreds, maybe thousands, of his photos under a free license over the years; and it was taken in a public place, so there is no privacy violation. Since there is no legal problem, this would first need to be taken up at each of the Wikipedias using the file; once each of those sites has stopped using it, a "courtesy deletion" based on the subject's personal preference might be possible, but would require some further explanation and buy-in from Commons community members. -Pete F (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There's no violation in anything with this image and it doesn't harm anyone. I actually see no reason why this image should be deleted. We don't delete images just because the depicted person doesn't like it, especially if there's no replacement. The DR starter has supplied studio shots although without proper permission, this image is taken from real life. We don't advertize cleaned studio images over real life shots.--Denniss (talk) 18:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I made a typo in my vote. As I hope you can see from what I wrote, I intended a "keep" vote -- I just typed "vd" instead of "vk" by mistake. Sorry for the confusion. -Pete F (talk) 19:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Krd 14:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work"; actually copied from [2] with the real owner's name cropped out. bobrayner (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but actually copied & downsized from [3] bobrayner (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but actually copied from [4], with logo and credits cropped out bobrayner (talk) 15:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused,personal image. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No value for Commons. Posted as fun. Mippzon (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work", but actually a screengrab from [5] bobrayner (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As indicated this is a reproduction of an artwork by Argentine painter es:Luis Lusnich (1911—1995), copyrighted without permission till the end of 2065. Gunnex (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (per above):


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description says that this was published in a 1949 Russian book, but that it dates from before 1927. That is forty years too recent to make any assumption that the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose This is an image from original description of the genus Caspiosoma, made by Iljin in 1927. Later, the image was republished many times. I have recorded one of sources where it was republished, because I have not the original one. This is old image, therefore it is free. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1927 is not "old". Any image more recent than 1884 cannot be kept unless the uploader can show that the creator died before 1944. That allows for a 20 year old creator who lived to be 80. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, this is indeed an image by Iljin B. S. and it was indeed published over 70 years ago (for example, here in 1930). The problem is that Iljin died in 1958 and his works are by no means in PD — NickK (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per NickK Krd 18:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not state real source. "For Advertising" isn't a source. This portrait is probably copyrighted by the Diocese of Imus. John Ronn talk 15:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Rovirosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

useless without descriptions, categories ...

37.5.2.120 15:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logotype. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yes. Because the colors are wrong and I changed the format. New picture: [6] PresidenciaMX 2012-2018 (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://fr.fifa.com/worldcup/players/player=359440/index.html Remy34 (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly copyrighted. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly copyrighted. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 37.5.2.120 06:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other uploads of User:RockReport also affected, which are mostly scans of photographs, of which is unclear if the uploader is the original photographer. I'm unsure which call to make, but maybe COM:PCP should apply. --Krd 16:24, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyheart, a revocable license Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 11:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. http://mimiandeunice.com/about/ says "For lack of a better option, all Mimi & Eunice cartoons are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike, also known as copyleft." --AVRS (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although it describes copyheart, it has a CC license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyheart, a revocable license Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 11:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. http://mimiandeunice.com/about/ says "For lack of a better option, all Mimi & Eunice cartoons are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike, also known as copyleft." --AVRS (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although it describes copyheart, it has a CC license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyheart, a revocable license Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 11:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. http://mimiandeunice.com/about/ says "For lack of a better option, all Mimi & Eunice cartoons are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike, also known as copyleft." --AVRS (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although it describes copyheart, it has a CC license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyheart, a revocable license Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 11:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. http://mimiandeunice.com/about/ says "For lack of a better option, all Mimi & Eunice cartoons are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike, also known as copyleft." --AVRS (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although it describes copyheart, it has a CC license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyheart, a revocable license Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 11:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. http://mimiandeunice.com/about/ says "For lack of a better option, all Mimi & Eunice cartoons are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike, also known as copyleft." --AVRS (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although it describes copyheart, it has a CC license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a photomontage 37.5.2.120 14:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image appears across the Web. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This case similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Western Pacific Airlines Boeing 737-300 The Simpsons Gupta.jpg. Here the jurisdiction of origin is different (Switzerland vs. the United States) though I believe this one wouldn't pass the applicable freedom of panorama criteria either. Psychonaut (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as per Commons:Deletion requests/Pokemon Jet. Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware of that discussion. It seems there are conflicting precedents here (though this doesn't change my opinion about this request). —Psychonaut (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: An airplane is not permanently on display in one place, so FOP does not apply. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, vector version available Kopiersperre (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam for a private health care management company. -- Tuválkin 17:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FDMS4, certainly — those are flour from the same sack, as we say in this language. Thanks for pointing it out! -- Tuválkin 21:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page [7] says all images (including this one) are from an anonymous source or a book. No indication that uploader has appropriate copyright permissions to add here. Please investigate and deal with as appropriate. Also, check this user's attempts to add this photo on Wikipedia, including creating socks to do so when they were blocked. Ebyabe (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attempts to add this photo - [8], [9], [10] -Ebyabe (talk) 17:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: As can be seen here (please excuse the very long URL), this image appears in many locations, and it is very unlikely that it is actually the uploader's work. The uploader was only using it as a shock photo anyway. Dustin (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded at Wikitravel in 12.2006 the file appears to be cropped from previously published via http://web.archive.org/web/20060218022335/http://www.apasear.com/en_index.htm (02.2006) = http://www.apasear.com/Rincon-Faro-6.jpg (last modified: 02.2006). The original version seems to be http://barriodecuba.altervista.org/immagini/Rincon_Faro_portorico.jpg Gunnex (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue of Raiden Tameemon

[edit]

This statue is a work by sculptor Fubo Takeuchi (竹内不忘, † 2011). Copyright is still in effect and unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover artworks. Yasu (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptures uploaded by User:663highland

[edit]

Artworks by sculptors who recently deceased or are still alive, ie their copyrights is in effect (cf corresponding Wikipedia articles on the artists and also 姫路市立美術館). Unfortunately, COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover artworks. Yasu (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

by Sueo Kasagi (笠置季男, † 1967)
by Yoshi Kinouchi (木内克, † 1977)
by Hiromori Kuwahara (桑原巨守, † 1993)
by Toshio Yodoi (淀井敏夫, † 2011)
by Yoshiro Mineta (峯田義郎, alive)

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vector version at File:France road sign M12a.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work; http://www.internations.org/london-expats/venezuelans. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the image on the given page. --Krd 14:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
True. Seems to have disappeared. As I tagged it already 1 week ago, I don't remember what I saw then. Eventually it was in "Fellow Venezuelans in London". Nevertheless, I have strong doubts that User:Anonimo114 is the creator of that image. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Book cover of a work by es:Ismael Martínez-Liébana, a living Spanish philosoper, published in 1996. Doubtful if Ismael Martínez-Liébana designed the cover. Already deleted in 05.2009, reuploaded by same user some days later.. Gunnex (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from http://www.termo.utcluj.ro/diploma/incalzire_birouri_pc.pdf Mihai (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Complex engineering drawing. This is way past the ToO. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jorferto. The eswiki-based user uploaded in a row in 07.2009 photos from German, Austrian and French philosophers for illustrating his creations on eswiki in 07. and 08.2009. This file is most likely part of user's illustration efforts ignoring copyright issues.

The exif infos indicates that this file was taken on 12:49, 5. Nov. 2004. 15 minutes earlier File:Baston.jpg was taken (identical exif), here uploaded as "own work" by Marlieba (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 20:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Since neither file shows up on Google other than here, I think we must assume good faith. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files about "hermaphrodite"

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request: these are all duplicates of File:Hermaphrodite symbol.svg --Trankuility (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All deleted and redirected by Billinhurst, closed by .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free cup. Stefan4 (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ΔΕΝ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΙΚΗ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ 85.73.154.150 14:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a fictitious/proposed flag clearly labeled as such; a better reason for deletion should be offered than offending against Greek nationalist sentiments... AnonMoos (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Even the patriotic sentiments of the Greeks is not a very strong reasoning, we have a lot of offensive stuff on Commons. Considering it is marked fictitious and is not claiming to be an "official" flag, I see no harm in it being here. Fry1989 eh? 05:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

There is no any flag of muslim Greece. this fake. 46.198.115.12 23:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- Everybody is aware that it's not official, and it's clearly labeled as such. That's not usually a valid reason in itself for deletion on Commons, unless there's also some hoaxing or hatemongering component which does not seem to be present here...AnonMoos (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to delete Krd 16:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kephir hasn't offered any arguments that weren't already mentioned in previous deletion discussions, and found insufficient then. There are many hundreds of "Special and fictional" flags on Commons, and there's been a de facto practice for many years that such flags are not usually deleted just for being special or fictional, but rather only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering).
By the way, some of your former nominations, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png were rather useless and non-productive, so I hope you're adjusting your modus operandi accordingly... AnonMoos (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The same arguments were sufficient to delete at least 50 other such phoney flags. I guess it can be called an established practice. Shall I post the list again? Also, I have no idea why you keep bringing up that one file ad nauseam. It is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether the file nominated here is within project scope, which you failed to explain. I hope you are adjusting your modus operandi accordingly. Keφr (keep talk here) 17:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad for you that you nominated this file as part of a spree of "revenge" deletion nominations aimed personally at me. You should keep in mind User:Pieter_Kuiper, who caused much turmoil and was eventually banned because of his incorrigible addiction to revenge deletion nominations. And Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png is highly relevant, since your nomination there (on the same basis as your nomination of this file) was inappropriate and firmly rejected, yet you still haven't said whether or not you'll take into account "lessons learned" from your just rebuff there when formulating future deletion nominations... AnonMoos (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have never made a single "revenge deletion nomination". I nominate files on their merits. Cease these baseless accusations immediately. Keφr (keep talk here) 06:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately for you, you have sometimes been less than perfectly straightforward in these discussions -- and the fact that there are thousands of Special or Fictional Flag images on Commons and you nominate some of them for deletion at a fairly low rate, yet after I opposed several of your proposed deletions, you all of a sudden nominated my most recently-uploaded Special or Fictional Flag image, and then a cluster of Special or Fictional Flag images uploaded by me, strains credulity as a "coincidence"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have not even looked at your uploads list, ever. If you keep baselessly accusing me of ulterior motives, you will be the one reported to administrators. Can you go back to explaining how File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png meets COM:EDUSE? Keφr (keep talk here) 15:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. And no don't come complaining at my talk page since everyone knows that DR's like this can be closed as kept or deleted and since it is still not clear if this flag is in scope or not I am saying keep. Natuur12 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a direct insult to the Greece flag as the user uses the Greek flag that symbolize Democracy and freedom with entering the Turkey’s middle east flag character 107.143.96.81 22:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the comment of "15:14, 28 June 2014" up there near the top... AnonMoos (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above DR: there is no particular reason to delete this specific made up flag, and we don't have actually a policy against them. Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.177.252.97 08:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again?? AnonMoos (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Θα πρεπει να πατε ολοι στην φυλακη που παραποιησατε την Ελληνικη σημαια.Ντροπη σας!Η Ελληνικη σημαια ειναι Ιερη και δοξασμενη και εσεις την μολυνατε με τα μουσουλμανικα συμβολα,αισχος.

Oh my! This level of racism in 2017?! Please delete the file before IPs from Athens begin another Nazi era in Europe... --E4024 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason of deletion : it is a manipulated national symbol and therefore illegal to be advertised as such. It is already transferred in several police departments across the country (There is laws about the national symbols and they should be respected). The moon symbol is representing the Chinese turtle/dragon God and all mongoloid countries represent that in their flags, it is irrelevant to our history, ethics, beliefs and insult in every manner.

Find a place more fit to your personal interests, where you can kill people from mongoloid countries on the screen, video games for instance... --E4024 (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Για παραποίηση εθνικού συμβόλου!! Δεν υπάρχει μουσουλμανική σημαία! Να ακολουθηθούν οι διαδικασίες του άρθρου 188 του ποινικού κώδικα. 2A02:587:5C04:4300:24E5:2A65:B2C3:8F8 17:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

παραπιιηση εθνικου συμβολου 2A02:587:2403:AB00:B947:8F7E:D15A:1F1F 18:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

ΠΡΟΚΛΗΤΙΚΗ ΦΩΤΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ!!! 2A02:587:7411:DD00:1B9:5E4:EC6:FE49 18:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

There is no this flag in Greece! 109.242.166.71 18:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I filed a report in the electronic crime department of police.

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.176.124.212 18:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.12.237.248 18:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 2A02:587:8402:7900:5854:2810:3874:E609 19:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 79.130.42.11 19:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 88.13.173.157 19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 88.13.173.157 19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

ΓΙΑ ΠΑΡΑΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΕΘΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΟΥ 94.65.62.251 19:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Παραποίηση εθνικού συμβόλου 141.255.92.141 21:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Η ΣΗΜΑΙΑ Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΡΟΣΒΑΛΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ 2A02:2149:8155:7400:C9CC:C763:F7D4:3199 21:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What the flock of anonymous IPs is doing (including the recursive deletion requests to delete the deletion request!) borders on nonsensical vandalism, and won't make this file any likelier to be deleted. AnonMoos (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above DRs. This swarm of redundant requests is ridiculous and disruptive, and I intend to revert any more that appear in the near future. The flag is clearly marked as a fictitious flag. Guanaco (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Παραποίηση Εθνικού Συμβόλου 2A02:587:9402:E100:585:1278:6AD1:E167 00:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geez. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]