Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2014-05-22_22-41.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2014-05-22_17-06.jpg){kind=link}
_Album_Cover.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Born_200_B-C_-_2014-05-22_12-43.jpg){kind=link}
![163 File:Stealth human known as, "Nathan" 2014-05-22 20-25.jpg](#File:Stealth_human_known_as,_"Nathan"_2014-05-22_20-25.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![254 File:"Donner vie aux masques de Léonard Condemine" , Juin 2014, @Kisskissbankbank.Léonard Condemine..jpg](#File:"Donner_vie_aux_masques_de_Léonard_Condemine"_,_Juin_2014,_@Kisskissbankbank.Léonard_Condemine..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![356 File:Cartel "Voces en el silencio".jpg](#File:Cartel_"Voces_en_el_silencio".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. And the file needs decoding. Taivo (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Three women hugging each other. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused pure text PDF of dubious value wikisource. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the author is claimed Michael DuVe' in file itself and Micknlissa in metadata. This is probably copyright violation, but out of scope anyway. If you are the text author Michael DuVe', please upload it into Wikisource. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
This photo is copyrighted. A223.16A (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a TV screencap. Storkk (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution Taivo (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I do not understand, what is depicted. Probably some kind of cover and so copyrighted. No good description, no proper source. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image with watermark, not used anywhere. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. I deleted all his other contributions as single covers of Albanian musician and this is the last. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Likely screencap, not obviously of freely licensed content. Storkk (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright likely held by the university, no indication that they license this under a commons-compatible license. Uploader - please see COM:OTRS to confirm that this file is freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, too promotional, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope - Media concerning unnotable DJ from Dominican Republic BertSeghers (talk) 07:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete speedy Motopark (talk) 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping -- gallery without images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-05-22_22-41.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-05-22_22-41.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 14:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-05-22_22-41.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-05-22_22-41.jpeg){kind=link}
Misspelled category while uploading files with wizard. No need for this anymore, there's an H to much in the name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barfisch (talk • contribs) 2014-06-09T19:09:56 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily, because this was empty category. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, article about unnotable DJ from Dominican Republic BertSeghers (talk) 07:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete speedy Motopark (talk) 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping -- gallery without images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, strange Apple logo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality scan. Better versions available at File:Naar Jheronimus Bosch - Verzoeking van de heilige Antonius de Grote van Egypte (Antwerpen).jpg en File:Circle of Jheronimus Bosch - Temptation of Saint Anthony (Antwerpen).jpg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, unused, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, have File:Boiling point vs molar mass graph.png from same uploader. This .pdf is less usable because it is a large-margin container around the same image, and displays at poor resolution via wikimedia rendering engine. DMacks (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-05-22_17-06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-05-22_17-06.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-05-22_17-06.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, who says, that David Oruade is best rapper alive? The uploader David Oruade! But this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
_2014-05-22_17-06.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Cannot even be used for illustrating, how dirty a boy can get. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
"The Uni Tutor" and telephone number watermarks make uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work doubtful. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, this is self-promotional user. I delete all his uploads due to advertizing and I blocked the user indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unusable low-quality image INeverCry 23:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 23:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Poorly scaled up version of File:Camilla d'Errico-crop.jpg. Not realistically useful given the existence of the other. Storkk (talk) 11:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright presumably held by The Daily Star. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Burj Khalifa, Symbol des arabischen Fortschritts, am Morgen- Photo Credit- SheikhPaflos 2014-05-23 22-38.jpg
[edit]
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Furthermore, there is no FOP in the United Arab Emirates. --84.61.138.168 19:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks like a screencap or TV title shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not an encyclopedic person and not used anywhere. Photo suggests he is a famous soccer player, what he isn't. Mbch331 (talk) 05:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.50.200 10:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.50.200 10:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:Luisito paz.jpg due to same reason and then are all the user's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by McZusatz due to copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Email screenshot. Copyright likely held by the sender, Telematica. Also, not clear how this fits into our scope. Storkk (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the file can be too simple for copyright, but I delete it anyway as unused personal file. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused PDF file and not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Additional potential copyright issues regarding images on page 3 and beyond. Storkk (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:CubAnime 15-05-2014.pdf, which is claimed to be made by Francisco Lores Espinosa, due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
nOT NEEDED EurovisionNim (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, well usable, but i delete it anyway, because the photo is not big and it has no metadata. The nominator is also the uploader. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal picture, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.65.50.200 10:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also mail address on right side and the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Too Blurry EurovisionNim (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is really too blurry for use. Even thumbnail does not look well. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
misformed filename Juergenk59 (talk) 12:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, redirect from incorrect filename (A must be in the end). Taivo (talk) 08:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.65.50.200 11:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, 10 smiling women and 1 smiling man, all white, all wearing T-shirts. All T-shirts have the same design, but different color. They are posing in front of hand-drawn flag of USA. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 06:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Fry1989 eh? 19:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: accoring french wikipedia non suitable for commons. JuTa 20:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
misformed filename Juergenk59 (talk) 12:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" 91.65.50.200 11:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:Coral SI-FA-SI se apresentado.jpg and then are all the uploader's contributions deleted. They are clippings from 1972 Brazilian newspapers. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
The person does not like to permit. Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept, this is not a reason to delete it. The subject is notable and there are no better photos about her in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Also, seems to be a hoax image that has been heavily modified. Storkk (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, copyright violation is likely. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Watermark and EXIF state © Niko Giovanni Coniglio nikoconiglio.com - Uploader, if you are this person, please confirm that fact via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot and/or TV screencap: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Upper left of each page seems to credit a "Gerardo Meneses Benitez"; uploader is a Edgar123 (talk · contribs). Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, out of scope anyway as text-only .pdf-file. Gerardo Meneses Benitez can upload it into Wikisource. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, tiny photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution, non-notable subject. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
unused personal image IagoQnsi (talk) 00:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
The person does not like to permit. Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but what do you mean by that? PointsofNoReturn (talk) 19:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Dr. Ena Ray Banerjee wants to delete her photograph, she personally requested me. Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 00:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept, this is not a reason to delete it. The subject is notable and there are no better photos about her in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a TV screencap - uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I want to replace with new one Petritiemini1 (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day, new file:Shembuj të shërbimeve RGA.gif is already uploaded. I deleted 6 more Petritiemini1's uploads, because they were redundant to each other. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Greatly scaled-up version of a very low resolution film still; dubious claim of "own work". Psychonaut (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally posed: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 18:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, smiling boy eats ice cream, his lips and nosetop are creamy. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Screenshot from non-free source, no reason provided why the uploader should be the author • 
• hugarheimur 17:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. JuTa 20:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Trivial logo of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Photo of a photo - taken in 1927, so uploader is unlikely to be copyright holder, and photographer not obviously dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
No indication of own work. Image looks like a rephotograph or scan of another image. User's other uploads have (and have had) problematic provenance. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Letterboxed, appears to be a screencap. Suspected copyvio. Storkk (talk) 10:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by NahidSultan as copyright violation. The uploader got a warning and all his uploads are now deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
No metadata, looks professionally or officially shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small, the uploader's only contribution. If OTRS-permission arrives, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Gopi Sunder, the current music sensation of Mollywood is dealing with something that many his predecessors have never even dreamt of- While composing the musical works of movies, music composer acquiring the m 2014-05-22 09-48.jpg
[edit]
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot and/or TV screencap: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 01:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: all other uploads (c)vios, high propability that this is one as well. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused drawing of non-notable person, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 12:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Movie poster - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. The moment is interesting (a boy blows away lights on candles on cake), but quality is bad. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
John XXIII became pope in 1958. It is unlikely the original creator has been dead long enough for this to be public domain. Storkk (talk) 15:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- The following copied from the talk page Storkk (talk) 13:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- But I joined there the halo. Should I put the same image, but write that the author is somebody else? (sorry, for my english) --TomášPolonec (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, @TomášPolonec: Do you mean that you added the halo to the picture? The "author" and copyright holder for our purposes is the original creator of the image. You have copyright only on your modifications. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Will be sold the problem, when I upload the same image, but write that the author is somebody else? --TomášPolonec (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi @TomášPolonec: - only if the original creator has licensed the file. Otherwise it is a copyright violation. Please see COM:L. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Will be sold the problem, when I upload the same image, but write that the author is somebody else? --TomášPolonec (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, @TomášPolonec: Do you mean that you added the halo to the picture? The "author" and copyright holder for our purposes is the original creator of the image. You have copyright only on your modifications. Storkk (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader confessed, that this is not own work at originally claimed. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is without metadata and not big, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
missing permission Lady Lotus (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, woman blows soap bubbles. Small blurry photo without metadata, copyright violation is possible. The uploader's last remaining contribution. Once the photo is deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jennyslate2.jpg. Taivo (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of photo whose copyright is unlikely to be held by uploader. Storkk (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader confessed, that he is not the author. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the file can be restored, if permission arrives. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also this is the uploader's only contribution. If OTRS-permission arrives, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Source is clearly facebook, not obvious that this photo is freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation - very unlikely to be own work BertSeghers (talk) 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Steinsplitter. This was film poster. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Keine passende Lizenz Datawars (talk) 13:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
_Album_Cover.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Album_Cover.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Purportedly an album cover - thus unlikely to be freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
_Album_Cover.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
_Album_Cover.png){kind=link}
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Dupe of File:Mantis from Galilee, 2.jpg. Danny lost (talk) 21:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Billinghurst. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Book cover - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Family picture, not used, people in picture may not have given their consent etc. Seems out of scope too. Mippzon (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the people are clearly posing here, no need for consent. But I delete it as small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, also out of scope as unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Lamborghini, view from front, with text "Didn't I tell you to use formal grammar?" Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Kreuzweg Kirchgandern, Pilgerweg Loccum-Volkenroda (im Gemeindebrief der evangelischen Kirchengemeinde Nikolausberg, Göttingen, März bis Mai 2014).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
From page 31 of this pdf. No indication that uploader is the copyright holder. Uploader, please confirm that you are the author and photographer via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, text and photo Heike Bilgenroth. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation: unlikely to be own work BertSeghers (talk) 08:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Steinsplitter. This was film poster and the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete. It doesn't make sense. Possibly wrongly uploaded instead of File:Mumbai metro map2.png §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unsuccessed file. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - unsourced collage INeverCry 23:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Not needed EurovisionNim (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, well usable, but I delete it anyway as small photo without metadata and uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, tiny photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Probably uploader's portrait, but categorised as god. Taivo (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, as much as I understand Georgian script, this is portrait of uploader himself. This is his only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Movie poster - - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 14:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, movie posters are not own work. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image, seems like a personal picture with no value for Commons. Mippzon (talk) 06:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. The uploader is Taliban. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
keine passende Lizenz Datawars (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused bio/CV, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Commons is not place for CV-s. If you become notable, then you can re-upload it into Wikisource. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused Bio/CV - not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:Biografia de Michelle Johansen.pdf and File:FAMILIA JOHANSEN TREJO.pdf due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal picture, not linked, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 07:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, tiny unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal artwork INeverCry 23:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, but the art is interesting. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Subi esta foto de mi y ahora me arrepiento, por favor borrenla Helena asteria (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio due to uploader's request on uploading day and also bad quality. This was Helena's only upload. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused selfie; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
According to description, this is an official press photo. Copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the photographer or can otherwise license the file, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the photographer, or can otherwise license this file, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I have now sent a message with authorization details for this photograph to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org --Caoimhin (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- That's great, @Caoimhin: . I've tagged the photo accordingly, to assist the OTRS team in triaging. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
OK. Thanks very much. --Caoimhin (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Permission confirmed via OTRS. ~ Nahid Talk 16:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Film poster presumably copyright ER Cinema, the production company. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 14:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, big, but bad quality. Taivo (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a book cover or poster. Not clear that uploader is the copyright holder. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm that fact cia COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, journal cover. Small file, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Olha lá.jpg Flavio Chame Barreto (talk) 11:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation - Tineye shows this was widely published years before being uploaded here. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please verify this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that uploader is copyright holder as claimed (need evidence); despite simplicity, probably falls above reasonable "simple shapes" non-copyrightability limit (low resolution does not bolster case here, this isn't a "fair use" rationale) Ubcule (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 22:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, text-only file, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 17:11, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Film poster. Copyright likely held by Hörspielfilm. Uploader - if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
_Born_200_B-C_-_2014-05-22_12-43.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Born_200_B-C_-_2014-05-22_12-43.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
_Born_200_B-C_-_2014-05-22_12-43.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, born 200 BC? It is unclear, what the boy is doing. The photo has no metadata. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
_Born_200_B-C_-_2014-05-22_12-43.jpg){kind=link}
Stated source seems to license its content as CC-BY-NC, which is not commons-compatible. I cannot find this specific photo on the site, however. Storkk (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, facebook image, no license at all. JuTa 20:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Private picture, not linked, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 07:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused distorted picture, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is not big and it has no metadata. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable team INeverCry 22:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
This seems to be a copyright violation. It is almost certainly not own work and seems to be a copyrighted trading card. ~HueSatLum 22:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, girl – beautiful, selfie – ugly. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo montage - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
![12:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/06/09#c-Storkk-2014-06-09T12:58:00.000Z-File:Stealth_human_known_as,_"Nathan"_2014-05-22_20-25.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
![08:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/06/09#c-Taivo-2014-06-11T08:53:00.000Z-File:Stealth_human_known_as,_"Nathan"_2014-05-22_20-25.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Steve Mcmahon, 2013 in Singapore with former Liverpool legend Robbie Fowler 2014-06-09 23-46.jpg
[edit]
Uploaded by disruptive user; unlikely to be free to use. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as copyvio from http://sports.xin.msn.com/life-changing-football-first-xi-boys-hope-to-turn-pro?page=9 © MediaCorp Lupo 17:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. But the girls are beautiful. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Watermarked daradaily.com: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot, and previously published on the web (e.g. here) : uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
The building image is complex enough, and doesn't simply involve vector images, that it appears to meet the threshold of originality and be eligible for copyright, Ytoyoda (talk) 14:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks shot from a privileged position, and may be a screencap: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
unidentified person (possible personality rights proiblem), very low quality and no realistic educational use Achim Raschka (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, no problems with personality rights, simply small unused very blurry photo and the uploader's only contribution, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of works presumably copyright ER Cinema. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
The Swedish description suggests that this image has been uploaded for fun/vandalism. Out of scope in other words. Mippzon (talk) 10:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 21:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The description of this image suggests that this is just uploaded for fun/vandalism. Mippzon (talk) 07:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is unused, without metadata and not big, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Film poster - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, film posters are not own work. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused, blurry, low quality image INeverCry 22:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 23:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
File:This is an artists rendering of a kiosk designed for six flags in Texas- 2014-05-21 21-20.jpg
[edit]
Original seems to have a watermark/company name on bottom left, uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the original artist and copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, the file can be restored. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, possibly a TV screencap: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused bio/CV, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Commons is not place for CV-s. Maybe he becomes notable, after that you can try to upload it into Wikisource. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable people INeverCry 22:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
JPEG copy of File:Flag of Europe.svg Amitie 10g (talk) 14:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: source = google. JuTa 20:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 23:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, previously published in Facebook. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Album cover - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Book cover - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
EXIF data credits Marlin Dedaj: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
File:На берегу -Каспийского моря- одним из самых прекраснейших сокровищ -Земли- 2014-05-23 00-34.jpg
[edit]
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, so this must be one of the most beautiful treasures of the Earth? It's good, that you think so about your wife. No metadata, though. Taivo (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Das Foto hat qualitative Mängel IraVerena (talk) 19:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal logo INeverCry 23:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of User:Kobain dx
[edit]
Here we have own work from circa 1910 and photo with unknown author from circa 1930. I suspect copyright violation. Uploader is Kobain dx (talk · contribs). Taivo (talk) 11:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Sergiy Palamarchuk
[edit]Sergiy Palamarchuk (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:AvatarPS.jpg (unused personal file)
- File:Batman-vs-Superman.jpg (OTRS-permission from author is needed.)
- File:HurykR.jpg (photo of photo. Permission from photographer of depicted photo is needed. License says, that it was published before 1951, but depicted person was born in 1994.)
- File:Вагон літерного поїзда.jpg (I do not believe own work.)
They are all either out of project scope (first file) or copyright violations (three others). Taivo (talk) 12:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:صورة لرجل من رجال قحطان وهو مبتهج بالنصر العظيم في احدى المعارك 2014-05-23 20-59.jpg due to same reason. The files are small and they have no metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, probably screenshot from television or video. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, blurry photo about smiling man with blue boxing mittens. No metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, very blurry, even thumbnail is blurry. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of Alianza Anime
[edit]Alianza Anime (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:
Unused personal files are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:DJHARPAL
[edit]Here are last photos, uploaded by DJHARPAL (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:
They are out of project scope as unused personal files. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Мой файл. Не соответствует правила сайта Ilia1992 (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:صورة محدثة من صور الشيخ راضي الأسدي 2014-05-23 20-50.jpg due to same reason: small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Additional potential copyright issues with background photo. Storkk (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of two photos. Not clear uploader is the copyright holder of both originals. Uploader, if you are the original photographer, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, for collages source and license for every photo is needed. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:RFX Prexo
[edit]Here are last files, uploaded by RFX Prexo (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Logo COSM.jpg (surpasses threshold of originality)
- File:Tom Viovi.jpg (small photo without metadata)
I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of Aresidency
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by Aresidency (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Интервью с Jaguar Skills (BBC Radio 1) для радио-шоу Sound Wave и журнала 7 minutes..jpg
- File:Sound Wave.jpg
_%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BE-%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%83_Sound_Wave_%D0%B8_%D0%B6%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0_7_minutes..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
They are out of project scope due to promotionality. But they are used in some incubator. I am not sure, that this counts as using, but Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Widely published on the web (e.g. here) - uploader, if you are the original creator, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Jexandra Hernandez
[edit]Jexandra Hernandez (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Cumbre Pico Naiguatá.jpg
- File:Haciendo cumbre en Pan de Azucar.jpg
- File:Parque Nacional Morrocoy con los mochileros.jpg
- File:Represa Uribante Caparo- Tachira.jpg
- File:Subida al Pico Pan de Azucar.jpg
- File:Valle de la Muerte- Sierra de la Culata.jpg
I consider them all out of project scope as unused personal photos.
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of Anku Balyan
[edit]Here are last photos, uploaded by Anku balyan (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:
They are out of project scope as unused personal files. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lukaskabral123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images out of scope of Commons.
- File:SELFIE Lucas Cabral dos Santos Miranda.jpg
- File:Inversão - Lucas Cabral dos Santos Miranda.jpg
- File:Lucas Cabral Miranda.jpg
- File:Lucas Cabral dos Santos Miranda.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nokiatang2009 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
- File:Unmjscom2012.jpg
- File:Unmjspoloshirt.jpg
- File:Unmjslogo.jpg
- File:Unmjslogo2.jpg
- File:Unmjssponsors.jpg
- File:Unmjsoldlogo2.jpg
- File:Unmjscardback.jpg
- File:Unmjscardfront.jpg
- File:UNMJSoldlogo1.png
INeverCry 23:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal artworks
INeverCry 22:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armando C Sanchez (talk · contribs)
[edit]All unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope.
- File:The black Hole Theorem.png
- File:The Bacl Hole Theorem.png
- File:LOS SANCHEZ.png
- File:SanchezHyun1.png
Storkk (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nopiskrupp (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Penis some Public Haires with Sixpack 2014-01-07 19-33.jpg
- File:Half erect penis 2013-12-15 14-18.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Good quality images.--Auric (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not such a good quality; a lot of similar images in related categories. --Ciaurlec (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 22:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nopiskrupp (talk · contribs)
[edit]There are already enough high quality images of penises
BertSeghers (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the photos are unused and without metadata. These are Nopiskrupp's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iulooooove (talk · contribs)1
[edit]Highly unlikely to be own work: no EXIF data, inconsistent sizes, and most of all, images themselves look like press photos.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cerise massons (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal artwork and logo
INeverCry 22:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, these are his/her only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaylex1994 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of oneself, having no educational use -- Out of Scope.
- File:Kaylex1994 2014-06-09 09-05.jpg
- File:Adeyi and Kudos 2014-06-09 09-03.jpg
- File:Kudos 2014-06-09 09-01.jpg
- File:Kudos 2014-06-09 08-52.jpg
- File:Kaylex1994 2014-06-07 23-01.jpg
- File:Kudos ejeh 2014-06-07 22-59.jpg
- File:Kudos 2014-06-07 19-51.jpg
- File:Double kudos 2014-06-07 19-19.jpg
- File:Kudos ejeh 2014-06-07 19-19.jpg
- File:Kudos irayohe ejeh 2014-06-07 19-18.jpg
- File:Am just kudos 2014-06-07 19-17.jpg
- File:I don't care lossing those who are not ment for me 2014-06-07 19-16.jpg
- File:Kudos at home 2014-05-20 20-19.jpg
- File:Kudos ejeh 2014-05-20 20-16.jpg
- File:Kudo ejeh at an hotel 2014-05-20 20-14.jpg
BertSeghers (talk) 08:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Steinsplitter. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Parco del Conero, spiaggia Urbani.jpg
- File:S. Lucia alla Badia, Siracusa.jpg
- File:Castel S. Pietro Romano.jpg
- File:Teatro Verdi, Trieste.jpg
INeverCry 23:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jodelacaes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jodelacaes
Gunnex (talk) 21:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
EXIF credits "Lilian van Rooij", while the uploader is User:Jomoonen. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS.
Storkk (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Finkclass13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Finkclass13, per User:Finkclass13 ("Soy Argentino y Me gusta el Punk Rock! ") apparantly a fan of es:Euforia (banda), a punk rock band from Argentina. Most likely all files grabbed from Internet/Facebook. Additional infos:
- File:Euforia wiki.jpg, attributed by Euforia itself to "Foto: Facundo Grillo Fotografía"
- File:Euforia-antidoto-2012.jpg + File:Euforia.jpg = album covers
Permissions via COM:OTRS needed.
- File:Euforia logo.png
- File:Euforia-antidoto-2012.jpg
- File:Euforia wiki.jpg
- File:Euforia nofx.jpg
- File:Bajo fer.jpg
- File:Euforia en vivo.jpg
- File:Euforia2.jpg
- File:Euforia.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, after receiving OTRS-permission the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joeshmoe553 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:One of the main characters.jpeg
- File:A young British American lad.jpg
- File:Hutu Refugee, 467.jpg
INeverCry 21:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, one of them was described "Hutu refugee in Congo", which was obviously false, because depicted person was white. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FelixMejia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images/logos
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 22:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope.
Anatoliy (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal files, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Newspaper clippings by disparate authors. Copyright unlikely to lie with uploader.
Storkk (talk) 13:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RitzRodriguez (talk · contribs)
[edit]EXIF data credits a "Melani Merlo" as the photographer, whereas uploader is RitzRodriguez (talk · contribs). Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Additionally, there are potential scope issues, as all images are quite similar except for cropping and mild expression differences. None is currently in use.
- File:Pedro Cerrilla Clicker360.jpg
- File:Pedro Cerrilla Clicker360 (3).jpg
- File:Pedro Cerrilla Clicker360 (2).jpg
- File:Pedro Cerrilla Clicker360 (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Storkk (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sugardreads (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Heterochomiai ridium smiling-001.jpg
- File:Oldnance2 zpsa2fe92f2-001.jpg
- File:Complete and sectoral heterochomia iridum & iridus.jpg
INeverCry 22:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, in scope (look description), but I delete them anyway as small photos without camera data. Copyright violation is possible. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS
- File:Male anatomy - penis 06.jpg
- File:Male anatomy - penis 04.jpg
- File:Male anatomy - penis 07.jpg
- File:Male anatomy - penis 02.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Photographiquegrenouille (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 21:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Beretta Pico Accesories.jpg
- File:Beretta Pico Holster.jpg
- File:Beretta Pico Taken Apart.jpg
- File:Beretta Pico with its Case.JPG
- File:Beretta Pico.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope - Media concerning unnotable DJ from Dominican Republic BertSeghers (talk) 07:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete speedy Motopark (talk) 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: HOusekeeping -- gallery without images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikiTeamMAS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images out of scope of Commons.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stpltnphoto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 21:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Cubicx
[edit]Cubicx (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Hani agv.jpg
- File:Hani baby.jpg
- File:Hani swa.png
- File:Hani swa1.JPG
- File:Hani swa2.jpg
- File:Hz sign.jpg
They are unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samesameagency (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 21:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rodo Iglesias (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
- File:Rodolfo Iglesias actor de teatro Córdoba Veracruz.jpeg
- File:Córdoba veracruz Rodolfo Iglesias actor de teatro.jpeg
INeverCry 22:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. But there exists Teatro (talk · contribs), who made Rodolfo Iglesias' userpage. They are probably the same person and I block Teatro. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
File:"Donner vie aux masques de Léonard Condemine" , Juin 2014, @Kisskissbankbank.Léonard Condemine..jpg
[edit]
Probably not a free image copy of this website Shev123 (talk) 15:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Derrivitive Work - Although the image is in strips, It's still a poster Ronhjones (Talk) 23:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Image is a direct copy from http://bsod.org/img/bsod545.gif . No evidence that uploader has the required permission from that site. Jeh92 (talk) 05:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Question Is it eligible for copyright? Taivo (talk) 09:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I'd say that's {{Pd-text}} or something like that. Category:Blue screen of death is full of similar files … --El Grafo (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
This is not a real screenshot; it uses a wrong font and background colour (it should have resembled File:029-bsod Windows 2000.png more). Being potentially misleading, this image should not be used and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Hi. This is almost certainly forgery. For a more accurate reproduction, see File:XScreenSaver simulating Windows NT BSOD.png. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 19:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- That one is just as bad: wrong font and resolution. But it cannot be deleted because some language editions do not care. Someone just needs to crash an NT4 in a virtual machine and upload a screendump of that. Keφr (keep talk here) 21:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Copy that; I am on it. You'll have it shortly. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- While I am at it, those projects can make do with File:XScreenSaver simulating Windows NT BSOD.png. Far less fake, borderlining genuine. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Kephir: The requested shot is ready: File:BSoD on Windows NT 4 Workstation.png. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:19, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- That one is just as bad: wrong font and resolution. But it cannot be deleted because some language editions do not care. Someone just needs to crash an NT4 in a virtual machine and upload a screendump of that. Keφr (keep talk here) 21:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
The font depends on what's in videocard ROM (not on anything in the operating system), and is not necessarily the same between all computers. AnonMoos (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi. Are you 100% sure? On Windows NT that does not use BIOS calls? Even when it has entered kernel mode? Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:19, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by file:BSoD on Windows NT 4 Workstation.png. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate obsolete cat. Per Wikispecies, current name for that is Category:Chaetopelma olivaceum. Danny lost (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
copyvio: unlikely to be own work BertSeghers (talk) 08:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, per watermark and pre-publication. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeedous (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very blurry picture with reflections of the photographer. Mippzon (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment Very true, but it's apparently the only photo we have of any such view of any of the Vienna tram tunnel ramps. I'm not married to the photo, but I'm not convinced it's completely unusable for any reasonable educational purpose. darkweasel94 19:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- What is so special about this view? We have several photos of good quality of that tunnel ramp, as well as photos of the tunnel, of which no details are recognisable on the photograph being discussed here anyway … FDMS 4 21:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Well, that's a Delete from me. FDMS 4 08:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I see, then I suggest we keep it! My bad, better to keep it until new better pic is available? //Mippzon (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete : Please use it in an article of one of the major WPs related to Vienna tram, if it is kept there for let's say a week, than we have to keep it on commons. A theoretical possibility does not help. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Baby care template design free for all user and editable--- designs is creating in photoshop version cs4-- www-techfameplus-com 2014-06-09 13-56.jpg
[edit]
No clear educational or encyclopedic use - out of Scope BertSeghers (talk) 08:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality image, no educational use BertSeghers (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Additional potential copyright issues regarding COM:FOP, depending on where this was taken. Storkk (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational use, not likely to be own work BertSeghers (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I suppose this could be used in an educational context (after cleaning up the description), but we would need a written permission via COM:OTRS. --El Grafo (talk) 11:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Commons has problem with very bad cat-pictures. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeedous (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Advertising logo, no educational use BertSeghers (talk) 07:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not sure about how useful this might be, but we would need a written permission via COM:OTRS anyway. --El Grafo (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose CutOffTies (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image, not clear what the meaning of the picture is Mippzon (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment But the file is used in wikiversity on user page on subpage "Wind turbine". I am not sure, what the photo has to do with wind turbines. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It belongs to a wikiversity project of the Howard Community College. Not of much use anywhere else, but per COMMONS:SCOPE#File_in_use_in_another_Wikimedia_project that's enough to keep it. (Yes, technically it's in the user namespace there, but it seems like that's how the HCC handles their projects.) --El Grafo (talk) 11:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use Indeedous (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational use, not likely to be own work BertSeghers (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I suppose this could be used in an educational context (after cleaning up the description), but we would need a written permission via COM:OTRS. --El Grafo (talk) 11:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 21:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. russavia (talk) 03:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- I would say that the appeal of this picture is the multiple images in the mirror, and thus it is not crystal clear that this is a derivative work, so I disagree. Loggie (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use now Indeedous (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete it is highly improbable the uploader in the author of this image of the wife of a person who died pre-1929 (it would likely make him at least 95 or more). A proper source, author, and date of creation and publication may clarify the matter. Ww2censor (talk) 09:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Zombies!! This is one of three previously deleted from commons, see the wikipedia log for their prior removal from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kishori_Mohan_Bandyopadhyay.
- (cur | prev) 18:20, 5 June 2014 Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs) . . (8,285 bytes) (-84) . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Mrs KMB.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Ellin Beltz (Copyright violation, see Commons:Commons:Licensing).) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 18:20, 5 June 2014 Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs) . . (8,369 bytes) (-81) . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Kishori Mohan Bandyopadhyay.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Ellin Beltz (Copyright violation, see Commons:Commons:Licensing).) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 14:33, 28 May 2014 Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs) . . (8,450 bytes) (-63) . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Science as Culture.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by EugeneZelenko (Copyright violation; see Commons:Commons:Licensing: Book cover).) (undo)
- There is a comment on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kishori_Mohan_Bandyopadhyay.jpg regarding the image's provenance.
- They weren't the uploader's work the last time, either. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Because the title should be "Gelako katedrala XXI. mendearen hasieran" Lasterketak (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Please use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
This is too small to be of any use, and it appears to be a scan of a postcard; while the scanning may be the user's own work, the image within is not. 66.183.45.19 05:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It is not too small for any use. Actually, it is used in fa.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Only because my computer doesn't seem to like right-to-left text. I've tried replacing it with the other one. 66.183.45.19 02:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete useful or not, im pretty sure it's a copyvio. Seems to be from a 1940s-1960s postcard: http://postcards.FOO.com/The-M-V-Abegweit-Between-New-Brunswick-and-Prince-Edward-/10970878/a.html. (domain is spam-blacklisted here, replafe FOO with bidstart to get the actual URL --El Grafo (talk) 10:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational use BertSeghers (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I suppose this could be used in an educational context (after cleaning up the description), but we would need a written permission via COM:OTRS. --El Grafo (talk) 11:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Le Voyage Masqué est une Technomagie, part III. Juin 2014 @Batofar. Léonard Condemine..jpg
[edit]
Probably not a free image copy of this website Shev123 (talk) 15:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete it is highly improbable the uploader in the author of this image that was taken pre-1933 (it would make him at least 90 or more) when the subject of the image died. A proper source, author, and date of creation and publication may clarify the matter. Ww2censor (talk) 09:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- The photograph is my family property. It was gifted to my mother by Lakshminarayan Roychoudhury's son Ranjit Roychoudhury so that I may use it in my stories about him. I am a writer and I write about Bengali people. There should not be any objection from anybody about copyright of this photo as I hold copyright of this photo. Shankar Sen (talk) 14:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunaletly ownership of a photo does not confer you with any copyright over the umage unless the photgrapher gave, or sold those, rights to someone else and mayeb you inherited them. We don't know the date of this photo or the photgrapher. If you have those details, as listed above, plus the country of origin, please tell us and we can reconsider it. Ww2censor (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlinked photo collage, seems like a personal picture, not providing value to Commons. Mippzon (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion File:Never Give Up.jpg and File:Rise Above Hate.jpg due to same reason: unused personal files. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete it is highly improbable the uploader in the author of this image that was taken pre-1929 (it would make him at least 95 or more) when the subject of the image died. A proper source, author, and date of creation and publication may clarify the matter. Ww2censor (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Zombies!! This is one of three previously deleted from commons, see the wikipedia log of the attached article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kishori_Mohan_Bandyopadhyay for their prior removal from this article.
- (cur | prev) 18:20, 5 June 2014 Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs) . . (8,285 bytes) (-84) . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Mrs KMB.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Ellin Beltz (Copyright violation, see Commons:Commons:Licensing).) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 18:20, 5 June 2014 Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs) . . (8,369 bytes) (-81) . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Kishori Mohan Bandyopadhyay.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Ellin Beltz (Copyright violation, see Commons:Commons:Licensing).) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 14:33, 28 May 2014 Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs) . . (8,450 bytes) (-63) . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Science as Culture.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by EugeneZelenko (Copyright violation; see Commons:Commons:Licensing: Book cover).) (undo)
- There is a comment on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kishori_Mohan_Bandyopadhyay.jpg regarding the image's provenance showing it is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 21:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality BertSeghers (talk) 08:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of the bust - likely a copyright problem. Perhaps the bust should be cropped out and revdeleted? Storkk (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
[[COM:]] This is an ORIGINAL sculpture by the artist. Not a derivative of anything. A Klein Sun Gallery staff took this photo. Not a copyright issue. Lisaekfa
- Hi @Lisaekfa: - The issue is that Li Hongbo owns the copyright of the sculpture, and this photo in its current state cannot be freely licensed (it is a derivative work of Li Hongbo's sculpture). He would need to contact COM:OTRS to confirm that this depiction of the statue can be freely licensed and, for example used commercially by anyone. Please see COM:OTRS. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 15:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep das ist nichts weiter als eine bloße Behauptung. Wo steht, daß das unfrei ist? --Ralf Roleček 07:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The toy looks more complex than the chair in this case. The country of origin is unknown, but the image originally comes from a German website, so maybe Germany is the source country. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: All created works have a copyright, including toys. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- In Germany don't exist any Copyright. --Ralf Roleček 15:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe the photo is too small for showing enough copyrighted parts. And it is not out of scope: it is used in nl.wiki in talk page about ships. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I do not believe this is a derivative work as I believe that the duck is being used in a utilitarian fashion here (as a mannequin, displaying the nametag, for the purpose of identifying me on my WIkipedia page). The very particular rubber duck design (the thing that had the copyright) is not an important element. As we can't see enough of the duck, or see it in enough detail to determine the very particular duck design used, the image should be fine. We could substitute the very particular rubber duck used for another one without changing the image. Loggie (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- You can't use COM:UA here. COM:UA only applies in some countries, and the source country of the duck is unknown. See for example [1] for a court ruling where Getty Images France was fined for hosting pictures of two different chair models on its website in violation of the copyright of the chairs. Also, countries which do place utilitarian objects in the public domain use differing interpretations of the word "utilitarian". For example, toys are not "utilitarian" in the United States (see COM:TOYS), but they are "utilitarian" in Japan. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You can't get around the copyright by simply putting a sign around its neck, sorry. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The image infringes on the copyright for the duck itself, which is a sculpture. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
very blurry EurovisionNim (talk) 03:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Picture quality is not a reason for deletion. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Really blurry, but as thumbnail looks great. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: What use does a badly blurred image of a license plate have? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Derrivitive Work. Suspect not designed by uploader Ronhjones (Talk) 23:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately, Italy has no Freedom of Panorama exemption. Storkk (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I do not believe this is a derivative work as I believe that the duck is being used in a utilitarian fashion here (as a mannequin). The very particular rubber duck design (the thing that had the copyright) is not an important element. As we can't see enough of the duck, or see it in enough detail to determine the very particular duck design used, the image should be fine. We could substitute the very particular rubber duck used for another one without changing the image. Loggie (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- You can't use COM:UA here. COM:UA only applies in some countries, and the source country of the duck is unknown. See for example [2] for a court ruling where Getty Images France was fined for hosting pictures of two different chair models on its website in violation of the copyright of the chairs. Also, countries which do place utilitarian objects in the public domain use differing interpretations of the word "utilitarian". For example, toys are not "utilitarian" in the United States (see COM:TOYS), but they are "utilitarian" in Japan. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Mannequins have a copyright, even when they are clothed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
As this is the logo of a high school and is at best eligible for fair use, it does not belong on Commons. In any event, the given license is clearly wrong. Subsequent to deletion here, this could probably be uploaded to the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale, as the High School has an article. Safiel (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I would also note that this file was being fraudulently used in several articles as representing a gang symbol, although I have since deleted all the fraudulent links. Safiel (talk) 06:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Further Comment Noting that the image has been restored to some of the gang articles. Instead of deleting the image links again, I will just wait for the deletion process to run its course here. Safiel (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - the file is derivative of File:Ghostscript Tiger.svg and the license comes from the original work. I merely transferred the image from en Wikipedia to Commons and don't really have any opinion on the retention of the image - but I think the license is legit. Kelly (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, if I am understanding this correctly, this is a derivative of a generic tiger and not the actual logo of the school. If that is the case, then we are good, though I should probably put a note in the article that this is a generic representation and not the actual logo. Safiel (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If it is the logo of the school, then it is a copyvio. If not, then it is personal art, out of scope, and using it as the logo of the school is misleading. Either way, there is no reason to keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sunil kawale (talk · contribs)
[edit]No educational or encyclopedic use - Out of Scope
BertSeghers (talk) 08:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status & unlikely to be own works, presuming that uploader is not owner of a satellite: 7 satellite images. Additionally nominating 2 photos of persons related to es:Bocos de Duero, a city in Spain (thumb size, mysteriously red bordered) and 1 unsourced & cropped, complex map = File:Mapa bocos.jpg, unlikely own works.
- File:Puente arriba y cruce canal.jpg
- File:Puente abajo y presa.jpg
- File:Plano pueblo.jpg
- File:Plano global.jpg
- File:El Picos y Villa prado.jpg
- File:Mapa bocos.jpg
- File:Caserío y estación.jpg
- File:Bodega y agua.jpg
- File:Angel Gónzalez Aguado.jpg
- File:Adoración Andrés.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Scantax Management).
- File:Klien-akuntansi-pajak.jpg
- File:Profil-scantax-management.jpg
- File:Layanan-akuntansi-scantaxma.jpg
MER-C 05:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Additional potential copyright issues surrounding the drawn character. Storkk (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: on top of this, likely a derivative work Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deepak Sudera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope
- File:Babycare landing page PSD Design, design is free for all users and designers- well layered and easy to use where user want to use-- free download and easy to manage- 2014-06-09 13-49.jpg
- File:Top Best Real Estate Logo design for all bloggers-- Designs are creating in Photoshop cs4 version and well layered- http---techfameplus-com-category-photoshop-psd-files-photoshop-psd-free-designs-logo-design-p 2014-06-09 13-47.jpg
- File:Top best Business logo design-- http---www-Techfameplus-com 2014-06-09 13-45.jpg
BertSeghers (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, advertisement Indeedous (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rapid Discount2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - Advertisement - out of scope.
BertSeghers (talk) 08:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio as well. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CARLOSTHECLIN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope - Media concerning unnotable DJ from Dominican Republic
- File:Creador de la red social villabook (2).jpg
- File:Carlos miguel fernandez.jpg
- File:Dj carlos miguel fernandez.png
- File:CREADOR de VILLABOOK.png
- File:CARLOS MIGUEL EL CREADOR DE VILLABOOK.png
- File:CREADOR APP VILLABOOK.png
- File:CARLOS MIGUEL FERNANDEZ.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BertSeghers (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChrisK1980 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of copyrighted box artwork (in this case, the art is not de minimis, as it is the focus- and main purpose- of the image itself).
- File:SWOTL Tour of duty Lockheed P-38 "Lightning".JPG
- File:SWOTL Tour of duty Lockheed P-80 "Shooting Star".JPG
- File:Secret Weapons of tle Luftwaffe.JPG
- File:SWOTL Tour of duty Heinkel He 162 "Volksjäger".JPG
- File:SWOTL Tour of duty Dornier Do 335 "Pfeil".JPG
Ubcule (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Uploader claims the logo is in the public domain as it consists only of "simple geometric shapes", though the image of the bird looks like it easily passes the threshold of originality. Psychonaut (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- for the record, I just re-uploaded it as it was overwritting a previous logo. Someone should contact User:SMiki55 and/or PRojekt Red as the logo is from a press kit (and most likly OK by license) Shaddim (talk) 18:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I contacted CD Project Red, please give this some time. Shaddim (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- damnn!!! I'm in contact with CE projec red... why can't you wait? :( Shaddim (talk)
- It had been a week. The image can easily be undeleted if permission arrives. Make certain that they follow the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's vacation time... things crawl even slower than normal... Shaddim (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- It had been a week. The image can easily be undeleted if permission arrives. Make certain that they follow the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- damnn!!! I'm in contact with CE projec red... why can't you wait? :( Shaddim (talk)
- Even to zero speed. No response anymore. :( OK, please revert this over-writte too: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdprojectred-logo.svg Shaddim (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Also affected:
Derivative work of contemporary sculpture (1994); no FoP in the US. Эlcobbola talk 20:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment File:Angkor I sunny day.JPG move to enwiki as FU. The other image is not in use, so no Fair Use possible. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Agree per Эlcobbola. Hamiltonstone (talk) 23:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 14:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete en:Virginia Henley's son with his son ... Probably non-notable people. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 18:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright notice states "Verbatim copying, [etc]... permitted worldwide ... if this notice and the copyright notice are preserved" this does not seem to allow for derivative works. Storkk (talk) 17:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer died more than 70 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 08:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Houston's top public figure Chris Mena Hinton also have gone by many names such as Candyman kris, Gud Gang, Houstons finest royal highest, has been revealed as the undercover millionaire whos been feeding the 2014-06-08 23-38.jpeg
[edit]
Out of scope personal photo Gbawden (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Christopher Mena Hinton Downtown Miami feeding the homeless 2014-06-09 00-05.jpeg
- File:Christopher Mena Hinton, millionaire at 26 years old Houston public figure- Worked with big producers like big rich and kelly roland also waner brothers records frist started in the music industry as a person 2014-06-08 23-24.jpeg
- File:Former music producer Candyman Kris formally known as Christopher Mena Hinton Houstons public figure spotted out in downtown Miami Feeding the homeless 2014-06-09 00-03.jpeg
- Delete Who says, that Mena Hinton is undercover millionaire from music industry? The uploader Menahinton1351 (talk · contribs)! Taivo (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 18:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be an official band image or mascot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Subject died in 1934. This is called selfie, but it does not look like that. Copyright violation is possible. No proper source. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
very low quality and no realistic educational use Achim Raschka (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Photograph of poster - copyright unlikely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
![17:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/06/09#c-Storkk-2014-06-09T17:01:00.000Z-File:Cartel_"Voces_en_el_silencio".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
![12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/06/09#c-Natuur12-2014-06-18T12:47:00.000Z-File:Cartel_"Voces_en_el_silencio".jpg){kind=link}
Coats of arms of Bariloche
[edit]Low quality files, there is a SVG version of this image currently in use in many Wiki projects.
Fma12 (talk) 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot. Jaqen (talk) 16:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Modern picture. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Likely derivative of Litmus.com. Storkk (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
This is small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Date is claimed 2008, while depicted person de:Gerhard Ludwig died in 1994. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
This is small photo without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
If the photo is made in 1953, then the author cannot be 70 years dead. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The depicted person is a notable en:S. Thaman. But the file is not big and it has no camera data. I do not rule out copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I retract my non-notability allegation, but (prompted by Taivo's comment) having had a look at the uploader's other contributions (e.g. File:Nagaram_movie_function_2014-02-16_00-27.jpg - watermarked Pluz Media ; and File:Movie poster 2014-05-03 22-56.jpg - that uploader claims as {{Own}}), I believe this image should be considered of unknown copyright status unless uploader can convince COM:OTRS. Until then, I believe COM:PCP should apply. Storkk (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please do not delete the movie poster. I consider it too simple for copyright and I changed license accordingly. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
This is a cropped version of the image at http://hiphopandpolitics.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/nyoil-suit-e1270131303148.jpg?w=250&h=203 and shown at http://hiphopandpolitics.com/2010/04/01/bet-to-launch-conscious-countdown-show-ny-oil-set-to-host/, making the copyright claim dubious. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Small photo with watermark and without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
small photo with metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect copyright violation. After deleting the photo Category:Files donated by Dezire GC will be also probably empty. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
The drawing is by a modern artist. No reason to believe he died more than 70 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Is it derivative work from copyrighted book cover? Back cover is also cover. In addition, the text in back cover is enough long for literary copyright and in full resolution clearly readable. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Out od Scope, artwork of a non-notable artist. Jarash (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with non educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I would not characterize the texture and coloring of the characters in this mark as ineligible for copyright. If it were solid color, maybe. But it's not. There are a number of different effects in use here. Of course, if the texture itself is PD, that might be different... but I'm not sure. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 07:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: US law ignores fonts Natuur12 (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
small photo without metadata, source www.gujaratindia.com says "Copyright © 2014 Government of Gujarat" Taivo (talk) 08:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
small photo without metadata, I suspect copyright violation Taivo (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution Taivo (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non scope image, seems to be a personal photo. --Taichi (talk) 04:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)17:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, similar image (likely from same set available here) Jdcollins13 - chat 15:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Does the logo surpass threshold of originality? That case OTRS-permission is needed from company representative. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ARyabinina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of company of questionable notability.
- File:1090x900logo.jpg
- File:Intervale.jpg
- File:1090x900 1x v01.png
- File:Top panel READY1.jpg
- File:Top panel READY.tif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete She has uploaded much more logos about the same corporation. Please delete all her uploads with "logo" in filename. Her other uploads I will nominate for deletion separately due to other reason. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)17:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
A modern mosaic from a subway station built in the late 1980s. No reason to believe the copright has expired. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
A modern mosaic from a subway station built in the late 1980s. No reason to believe the copright has expired. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Google translate of description and filename is "That is the Royal Saudi Ahli". Storkk (talk) 14:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
A modern mosaic from a subway station built in the late 1980s. No reason to believe the copright has expired. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio of 2d artwork not covered by fop in the UK and probable text copyvio Oxyman (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
School logos are not own work. Surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Modern picture. No reason to believe the author died more than 70 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No reason to believe the photographer of this 3-dimensional work of art died more than 70 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of Merlymeleanrossana
[edit]Here are last files, uploaded by Merlymeleanrossana (talk · contribs) and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Aplicacion tratamiento local Artrosis codo.gif
- File:Artrosis.jpg
- File:Bulimiaab.jpg
- File:Bulimia…-nerviosa-2.jpg
- File:FOTOS WIKI.jpg
- File:FFFrrr.jpg
- File:Skeleton lafsHUESOS.png (suspicious watermark "ADAM")
- File:Ygugougvo.jpg
- File:Yhyhik.jpg
They are small and they have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
A modern mosaic from a subway station built in the late 1980s. No reason to believe the copright has expired. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Modern picture. No reason to believe the author died more than 70 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
small photo without metadata, no freedom of panorama in Bulgaria and modern building, the uploader's last remaining contribution Taivo (talk) 09:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
A modern mosaic from a subway station built in the late 1980s. No reason to believe the copright has expired. Ghirlandajo (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Originally nominated as a derivative of non-free content. Split to individual DR. FastilyClone (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I do not believe this is a derivative work as I believe that the duck is being used in a utilitarian fashion here (as a mannequin). The very particular rubber duck design (the thing that had the copyright) is not an important element. As we can't see enough of the duck, or see it in enough detail to determine the very particular duck design used, the image should be fine. We could substitute the very particular rubber duck used for another one without changing the image. Loggie (talk) 17:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- You can't use COM:UA here. COM:UA only applies in some countries, and the source country of the duck is unknown. See for example [3] for a court ruling where Getty Images France was fined for hosting pictures of two different chair models on its website in violation of the copyright of the chairs. Also, countries which do place utilitarian objects in the public domain use differing interpretations of the word "utilitarian". For example, toys are not "utilitarian" in the United States (see COM:TOYS), but they are "utilitarian" in Japan. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 11:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:The Dead Girl
[edit]User:The Dead Girl uploaded these files:
- File:Webcam-toy-foto219.jpg
- File:Caricature with sleep.gif
- File:Anigif1 Eyes.gif
- File:Anigif2 Love.gif
- File:Anigif6 Preocupado.gif
They are all unused artwork of non-notable artist. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out-of-scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
The Dead Girl (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:2013-05-23 Myself..jpg
- File:Anarchy..JPG
- File:Dr. Martens.png
- File:Eyes..jpg
- File:Morean, Dark fortress.(1).jpg
- File:Morean, Dark fortress. (2).jpg
- File:Morean, Dark fortress. (3).jpg
- File:Morean, Dark fortress. (4) gif .gif
- File:Morean, Dark fortress. (with No facepaint).JPG
- File:Myself and my new friend Raven..jpg
- File:Webcam-toy-foto134.jpg
- File:Webcam-toy-foto135.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_gif_.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
They are without metadata and not big. I suspect copyright violation. Some photos are described as "edited by me", but who is the original photographer? Taivo (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No FOP in Belarus. The church was built in 2000. Jarash (talk) 10:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
A modern mosaic from a subway station built in the late 1980s. No reason to believe the copright has expired. Ghirlandajo (talk) 11:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, appears to be a screenshot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Low quality images without educational use
- File:Aaaaaaaa 2014-06-09 15-41.jpg
- File:Ssss 2014-06-09 14-51.jpg
- File:Aaaa 2014-06-09 14-50.jpg
- File:Rrrrr 2014-06-09 14-46.jpg
- File:Wwwww 2014-06-09 14-44.jpg
- File:Qqqqq 2014-06-09 14-42.jpg
BertSeghers (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete
- per nom for File:Aaaaaaaa 2014-06-09 15-41.jpg, File:Aaaa 2014-06-09 14-50.jpg and File:Wwwww 2014-06-09 14-44.jpg
- per watermark for File:Ssss 2014-06-09 14-51.jpg
- File:Rrrrr 2014-06-09 14-46.jpg is a low-resolution copy of an image widly available all over the web (example: [4])
- File:Qqqqq 2014-06-09 14-42.jpg – well, I wasn't able to find a source for this, but in context with the other uploads I highly doubt the claim of own work. Also pretty much useless.
- Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 18:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vedhant's photography (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope.
- File:But it was hot really -- 2014-06-09 14-25.jpg
- File:More then 5000 years old wooden door still in Radha Raman temple at Brindravan - 2014-06-09 14-23.jpg
- File:Awesome day it was--- 2014-06-09 14-22.jpg
- File:Yamunaji---- At Brindravan auspicious day--- 2014-06-09 14-20.jpg
- File:Prem Mandir Brindravan --- 2014-06-09 14-19.jpg
- File:Everything is possible----- 2014-06-09 14-17.jpg
BertSeghers (talk) 08:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
{{vd|Delete all}} with a possible exception of File:Prem Mandir Brindravan --- 2014-06-09 14-19.jpg if somebody can identify the building, it looks like it could be of some importance. It'd need a crop to the subject too. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Keep File:Prem Mandir Brindravan --- 2014-06-09 14-19.jpg, Delete rest. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal images outside scope of COMMONS.
- File:Boscosid 2014-06-02 01-14.jpg
- File:Siddharth lodha @boscosid 2014-06-02 01-13.jpg
- File:Siddharth lodha 2014-05-27 10-50.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid there is currently no evidence that the Flickr account is operated by Two Notes … FDMS 4 13:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I can assure you it's the official Two Notes Audio Engineering/Orosys Flickr account. It was created by Guillaume Pille himself, president of Two Notes/Orosys, to help me bring more pictures in the Two Notes Audio Engineering French Wikipedia page.
Lordofmetal (talk) 08:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: We have to some faith in flickr xpressions, and representations. One rumoured statement disclaiming, versus an explicit statement confirming. If the site gets a take down notice, or we get some other confirmatory note either way, then maintaing current status. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, appears to be a screenshot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Going by what the concern was last time, this image is probably not related to the one that was previously deleted. Storkk (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of own work, if Commons:OTRS permission presented then can be reviewed — billinghurst sDrewth 13:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm skeptical about the uploader's claim of being the creator of this image. It shows up on a large number of websites; it looks like clip art and/or an OS's file type icon. Psychonaut (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of own work — billinghurst sDrewth 13:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Non-free logo. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Wesbite: http://www.stmartinsafc.net/teamhome.php?teamid=15 PointsofNoReturn (talk) 20:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of public domain status, no fair use allowed, please enquire at enWP about uploading there for "fair use" — billinghurst sDrewth 13:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Image of relatively non-notable (not Alexa-ranked) website used in en.wikipedia article that has now been deleted. Insufficient general-purpose use. (Had qualms about copyrightability, but probably a mixture of pd-text and de minimis secondary images). Ubcule (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Still used in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use at enWP — billinghurst sDrewth 13:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted Global usage lied! Not in use, no evidence that it meets educational purpose, — billinghurst sDrewth 08:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, declared to be a "foto" it is most likely grabbed from a video source with unknown copyright status. Gunnex (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uncontested deletion request, no evidence presented that work of contributor — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Probable copyvio & misrepresentation of copyright status. There is a long history of special-purpose accounts appearing and uploading professional-quality photos of this professor - sometimes claiming them to be their own work. The user who uploaded this has no other edit history. Please see en.wikipedia discussion at Talk:Raj Reddy and the associated article history. Megalibgwilia (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The sentence "The user who uploaded this has no other edit history." is incorrect. (S)He has uploaded 6 more photos, all about the same person. They all have OTRS-ticket. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS provided and accepted — billinghurst sDrewth 14:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of an organization (probably a "clan" in some online game) created by the uploader. Qwertyus (talk) 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, and not evident that within scope, uncontested DR — billinghurst sDrewth 14:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Presumably copyrighted Klingon logo Powers (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept, PD-ineligible. Kameraad Pjotr 20:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
The International Space Station Expedition 40 mission patch was originally going to include an outline of the Klingon symbol like this one, but it had to be redesigned "due to copyright concerns". http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-060614a-klingon-star-trek-astronaut-patch.html The Precautionary Principle suggests we should show similar restraint. Powers (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright through precautionary principle and actions of third parties with regard to legal opinion, accordingly incorrectly licensed. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
License unreviewed uploads from 2010, taken from external sites for which I can't confirm {{Cc-by-3.0}}-license. For File:But.jpg we have http://www.herpindiego.com/SALE%20and%20USE.html = "All images and accounts found on this website are owned by Brad and Lynn Weinert and protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Permission to use and reproduce images and accounts from this website may be obtained by contacting us at the following link. In general, we grant permission to use and display (but do not assign rights), on a non-commercial basis (...)" = incompatible with COM:L.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not images evidently taken by uploader, no evidence that images have been released under distributable licence — billinghurst sDrewth 02:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of contemporary (2001) plaque. No FoP in US. Эlcobbola talk 20:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. Appears to be the same image uploaded and deleted several times previously - sometimes with claim of being own work. Please see Talk:Raj Reddy on en wikipedia. User who uploaded it has no other edits. Megalibgwilia (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have pointed the user to have the copyright holder to email to have this included in the other OTRS submission or a new one. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Krd 18:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cynko as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio from http://media2.pl/media/111870-Rusza-Polsat-Newsplus.-Co-w-ramowce.html
- Deleted and restored. (c) status needs discussion Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Piotr13283: @Cynko: @Jcb: @Masur: Input needed.
- Keep - PD-textlogo of course - Jcb (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I wouldn't judge so certainly that it is "PD-text of course". Also, whether it is PD or not, we have now falsely ascribed autorship and a false source. Masur (talk) 19:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, you would rather just delete it, without following proper procedures. Jcb (talk) 16:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Precisely - as false authorship is a clear violation of copyrights rules and Commons rules. Masur (talk) 13:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, you would rather just delete it, without following proper procedures. Jcb (talk) 16:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Surpasses threshold of originality. Old logo File:Polsat news plus logo.jpg is simple, this is not. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Looking to close and delete as it appears to have sufficient design elements. It looks suitable for upload if fair use can be applied at plWP. Please transfer if possible. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 21:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of 4 images used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- The images used in the compilation don't seem to appear elsewhere on the web. If we had something to confirm one of the images, that would be of assistance. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- 1 part taken from (example) http://travel.sina.com.cn/china/2009-08-13/1604101223.shtml (2009, Copyright © 1996-2009 SINA Corporation, All Rights Reserved) = http://i3.sinaimg.cn/travel/ul/2009/0813/U3059P704DT20090813152344.jpg (last modified: 2009), 1 part taken from (example) http://www.xwtps.com/photography/20101228174129.html (2010, Copyright: Luzhou Pressphoto Agency [translated]) = http://www.xwtps.com/uploadfile/20101228/201012281741241734.jpg (exif available) and 1 part most likely grabbed somewhere from Facebook = http://gju4.alicdn.com/bao/uploaded/i1/T1ry0IXAFeXXb1upjX.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 21:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
There is no author for the picture. The picture has been directly taken and uploaded from "http://www.bollywoodhungama.com". The source of the picture is here (http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/more/photos/view/stills/parties-and-events/id/1459719). As the person who took the picture has not given an official copyright notice or proof of originality, this picture should henceforth be deleted from Wikimedia Commons.as this violates the copyright laws and policies of Wikimedia. -Jacob 116.74.10.38 19:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: No reason for deletion. License and permission OK. Yann (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Found this following the undeletion request (see Old revision of COM:UDEL ). I have some doubt that bollywood hungama is the author, we had similar cases in the past, similar insofar that the watermark of bollywood hungama is missing and that other publication with other author information can be found on the internet. In this case I refere to indiatoday giving Viral Bhayani - presumably https://twitter.com/viralphoto - as author. --Martin H. (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Martin H.: Hi, Hungama is a website, not a photographer, and it publishes pictures made by photographers under a free license (i.e. we don't know what agreement there is between them). Do you have any clue that the license and/or the permission are not valid? I don't see any. The picture on India Today could be published with a special agreement from the photographer, or simply copied from Hungama. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- The template explicitely mentions " Bollywood Hungama parties/events that are exclusively created by their own photographers" --Martin H. (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- How do you know that Viral Bhayani is not one of their photographers? Do they have a list of their staff somewhere? Yann (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am not sure that the "statement of exclusively created" invalidates anything that Yann has said. One can exclusively create, and still licence for public domain. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- How do you know that Viral Bhayani is not one of their photographers? Do they have a list of their staff somewhere? Yann (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- The template explicitely mentions " Bollywood Hungama parties/events that are exclusively created by their own photographers" --Martin H. (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Source website does not indicate that they do not own the rights to this image. If this is a recurring problem we should reconsider the rules for this license template but with the current status I don't see enough doubt to warrant deletion. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)