Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 31st, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Talk page is just a copy/paste of (I guess) a Portuguese Wiki article. Not a relevant talk page. FakirNL (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JOAO PEDRO MORAIS CAVALHO 200.163.5.70 18:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion given. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 09:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain, previously published at http://img.youtube.com/vi/tDx6I3Hox9E/0.jpg and http://2014people.com/evie/evie-6.html Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 23:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is already a similar photo Gideon Faihriem (talk) 02:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Question What is the name of the other file? --Sreejith K (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - The duplicate file is in en wiki. (File:Faihriem damsels in traditional attires.jpg). Please put a deletion request in en wiki. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have some doubts about this shot of Rivarolo Canavese. The uploader has cropped away a large watermark that said "Foto: Luis Barbosa/Titan Sports".[1] However, on the Flickr-source there is an additional credit below the image, which says "(C) Riccardo Scanferla". So, it seems that even the Flickr-user doesn't know or can't decide whom to the credit. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It seems to be evident copyright violation. Deleted unless OTRS permission appears. Ankry (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

скриншот из игры. несвободный. Неверный автор. — Redboston 12:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot, copyvio Julo (talk) 12:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 09:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is historically significant image, but is only permitted for Non-Commercial and education usage by copyright holder Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons:Fair use JuTa 23:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Julo (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad author (potential Flickrwashing), suspicious watermark.    FDMS  4    13:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Denniss. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errore di caricamneto Utentedae (talk) 19:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asiancock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of focus images (COM:PORN), explainable if someone drops his pants and grab a camera for his self-exhibitionism. And guess what? Nothing we donna have already...

Yikrazuul (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of project scope. Ankry (talk) 16:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Special:Nuked his contributions through the AN/V thread before seeing this. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rogermark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work, seeing the user's history.

Yann (talk) 04:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Yann. Probably not own work for this two pics. Not only because of the user's history but these pics are from the same series  : player with Stanley Cup in hands. (Check the previous deleted files). Supertoff (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Low resolution files, uploader with a copyvio history. Dereckson (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charitarth Unagar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all personal art photographs that have no educational purpose. Commons is not a host for personal art. In addition, at File:Charitarth Unagar Photography.png, the file containing the watermark which appears in all of them, he says "No one can use this photo tag without getting authorized". This suggests that none of these are truly freely licensed.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All images have been speedied already. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 10:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS ~ Nahid Talk 06:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused personal logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 12:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 20:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 13:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS ~ Nahid Talk 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 14:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 08:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file, out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 14:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect page, duplicate of Category:Saint Michael Church (Gnotzheim) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

dont worry, ive done this a number of times myself.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure; replaced by File:Heptachlor-3D-balls.png that is based on crystal data (doi:10.1039/P29730001374). Leyo 18:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with this request. --YassineMrabet (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 10:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be uploaded purely for promotional purposes. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host; Commons is not a place to advertise. LX (talk, contribs) 15:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not in project scope. — Racconish ✉ 13:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Because of copyvio. And this is not a personal photo. South Korean actor Lee Dong-wook ~ Nahid Talk 08:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 06:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 06:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly where Nintendo gives his Copyright away for an Art Libere License? In the Wikia-Link is nothing written of these act. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 06:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Out of COM:PS. ~ Nahid Talk 06:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. Uploader added CC license later, as for the source image copied from flickr. But I think this cut conflicts with Commons:De minimis and Commons:Derivative works. Its a copyrighted comic character. JuTa 23:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adrien barbosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sisyph (talk • contribs) 2014-05-30T04:49:53‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 06:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad author (potential Flickrwashing), suspicious watermark.    FDMS  4    13:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Added File:敘利亞內戰中死亡的兒童.jpg to this RFD.    FDMS  4    13:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is for media files, we have Commons:Wikidata. More pages are only confusing and prevent find the actual information (especially if there are not linked to each other). Merge the short translations somewhere PS: I simply guess to subst this all to Category:Wikidata (I see only yet that this is a template like inclusion). -- Perhelion 09:37, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

??? -- Perhelion 19:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted & created redirect (seeSpecial:WhatLinksHere) Steinsplitter (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Humanoo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reproductions of artworks by not specified/unknown (Brazilian?) artists with unclear copyright status, taken from the pinacotheca of pt:Teatro Municipal de Osasco, a Brazilian theatre. Obviously not "own works". Further infos about the creators & permissions needed.

Gunnex (talk) 11:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subhadeep2508 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Some files possibly taken from http://prasunbanerjee.in/gallery (© Prasun Banerjee).

Gunnex (talk) 12:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajat jaswaniya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidenc of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by No1gazza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The two images appear to be photographs of a television broadcast (see COM:DW). The logo suffers from the same problem.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Macedon-40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of Greek painters which are not in public domain in Greece. Most likely {{PD-US}} is applied incorrectly.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Macedon-40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of Greek painters which are not in public domain in Greece. Most likely {{PD-US}} is applied incorrectly.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, first of all, be so kind to remove from nominated "bulk" files SOHOS1, PAPALOUKAS2, PAPAPALOUKAS5. This files are not works of painters, but photo of unknown authors. Furthermore, this photo dated before 1923. Will continue. Macedon-40 (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Add: files OTHONEOS 3 and 4 are also photos dated 1913. Macedon-40 (talk) 05:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:OTHONEOS4.jpg is a painting. File:OTHONEOS4.jpg photographer died in 1949 according to file information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camb.g2g (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and most likely all PD-fails (sourced with several sites, including "Google" and configured with PD-because "public access Map", "Visual Aid", "Satellite images and maps", etc.)

Gunnex (talk) 22:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by متعب رزق الله (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. These look like photographic reproductions of pre-existing photographs or printed publications.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 10:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Used in article tagged for Speede Delete at es:Wikipedia. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This individual did not consent to this photo being uploaded to the world wide internet while during a stay at Hoag Hospital Wwwtmk (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope anyway Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description, big white border, appears to be a personal photo but is not used on any user page. If this is useful for something, I'd have no problem with keeping it. I encountered it because of its lack of categories, and couldn't think of anywhere useful to categorize it. Jmabel ! talk 00:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status is unclear; copyright not owned by uploader User:Stiegenaufgang. The Yeti 07:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination: I removed all invalid tags and replaced them with {{Free screenshot}} plus a pointer to the full text of the license. The Yeti 05:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status is unclear - if it is FOSS, please tag only with the apropriate license, otherwise delete. The Yeti 07:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Im tired of this discussion "May we use a Screenshot of Truecrypt in Wikipedia?"
The License [2] is unavailable at the moment and the future of the software is unclear [3].
Please feel free to delete a this Screenshot if you believe this will make the world better. --DonatelloXX (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Currently this image is tagged with {{GPL}} and {{PD-self}}, which are both wrong. If you can propose a valid argument why this image is free, please do it using {{PD-because}} or {{PD-author}}. The Yeti 18:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination: I removed all invalid tags and replaced them with {{Free screenshot}} plus the full text of the license on the talk page. The Yeti 05:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate portrayal of Android, too many copyrighted elements (icons, widgets, TouchWiz skin) ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted wallpaper ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader is not the autor 91.65.49.105 17:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source information is inadequate. There is no author, date taken, publication date (important for the stated license) or initial publisher.

It says the source is http://www.el-shazly.com/ , which is a currently-broken website about him from "American Mideast Research and Publishing". It looks like the photos gallery was at [4] . Internet Archive shows the photo there (7. PHOTO-10), but without any source information. There is no information at the individual photo page ([5]) either. It's also at [6] (a different version of the site), but still without a source


However, that site is unlikely to be the copyright holder anyway. The file page here also does not say where the picture was taken. [7] gives a caption of "As the Ambassador to Britain." If we ambassador to Britain at the time, it's quite possible it was taken in Britain. I think that would make the stated license invalid. Also, even if it is public domain in Egypt, no reason is given for being public domain in the U.S.

If this is deleted, please request that it be restored under fair use at Wikipedia:REFUND, per the request at File talk:Ambasador Saad El Shazly.jpg. Superm401 - Talk 20:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to no describe 106.219.188.30 13:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope image of what is likely a minor. Nymf (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ankry as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative work of Image from http://johnvanderwoude.com/art/airports/; that site, marked copyright. No source or author info here.
Converted by me to DR, simply because the image had been uploaded already in 2006 to Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, picture of 3 non notable people. According to the description, one people in this 2014 picutre is named András Sütő, but it cannot be the famous writer: he died in 2006. BrightRaven (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality. I uploaded this file just to show the surrounding of some Orchidaceae I had taken photos of to ask for identification on german wikipedia. This was successful, so the photo is not useful anymore. Biodehio (talk) 19:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:10, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused file, out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an out-of-scope personal image. It is used in one place - https://id.wiktionary.org/wiki/kaos - but that use appears to be more or less vandalistic. Jmabel ! talk 00:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description, categories ... 91.65.49.105 17:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


description

Christoph Malaisé Snr Date 5 October 2011 Source Family portrait in private ownerhip Author Unknown


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a caracal by a 10 years old child. "Carla Pieterse" is unknown. I don't see where we can use it in encyclopedia. This picture seems out of project scope. Abujoy (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 10:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images infringes on the literary copyright for the plaque. Although "short phrases" are not copyrightable in the USA, a work consisting of several sentences clearly has a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wikipedia isn't a web-space provider MartinS (talk) 13:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, self-created PDF with no realistic educational purpose. BrightRaven (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless photo transferred from Flickr stream Viscontino (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wikipedia isn't a web-space provider MartinS (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Background seems to be taken from Battlefield 3: see http://n4g.com/news/883975/battlefield-3-back-to-karkand-features-improved-destruction Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Han_Ji-min_in_2013.jpg Fetx2002 (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Watermark "© M[anuel] Aragón" does not match uploader's name Lluis Roig (talk · contributions · Statistics). The original version can be found via Aragón's website = http://www.fotomanuel.es/3.html = http://www.fotomanuel.es/resources/Daniel$2BPio+2.jpg. Permission from "Manuel Aragón" via COM:OTRS needed. Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image although Historically Significant, is only permitted to be used by the copyright holder for Non Commercial usage only Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 04:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wikipedia isn't a web-space provider MartinS (talk) 13:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File needs an OTRS ticket from the photographer ERIC.BIENVENU (EXIF)91.65.49.105 17:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wikipedia isn't a web-space provider MartinS (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted wallpaper ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a presumably non-free, copyrighted model with no evidence of the original author's permission or anything to suggest that this would be covered by freedom of panorama. LX (talk, contribs) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from http://ttb.kpi.ua/en-s/report_en/report_en_18-20/ (published in 2012), no proof that Perohanych is the author of this work NickK (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image, apparently out-of-scope personal image (not used anywhere). Ubcule (talk) 21:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a photographic reproduction of pre-existing printed publication. LX (talk, contribs) 09:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://produitsjaninebenoit.blogspot.fr/ Krd 07:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí yo por error Fdetovar (talk) 20:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by "Humanoo" at Wikivoyage in 2011 the photo appears to be cropped & derivated from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1141365 (2010, by winiciusnet, photo "13. Bairros do Centro em primeiro plano e Bela Vista aos fundos") = http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8543/osa0671winiciusnet.jpg (slow loading/404, cache). Gunnex (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has been replace by a more current file en:File:PBS Regional Map 2.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Educatedblkman1914 (talk • contribs) 2014-05-31T04:10:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader says they created image in 2008. It appears what they mean is that they scanned an image in 2008, that was taken a long time ago, by an unknown person, for an unknown publication (probably a year book). Without any information on the original picture and photographer we can't use the image. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLC Middle School.jpeg Rob (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. The sculptor of statue Naito Haruji (
内藤春治
) is died in 1979, still in copyright. Vantey (talk) 03:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry pic uploaded by mistake Kippelboy (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image from http://johnvanderwoude.com/art/airports/ that site, marked copyright. No source or author info here.
Converted by me to DR, simply because the image had been uploaded already in 2006 to Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no copyright permission author 189.172.188.205 16:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. LX (talk, contribs) 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Little educational value because although it is claimed as an educational tool, it is effectively little more than user artwork. It is also contradictory to have a PD notice and at the same time require people to ask the creator before they can use it. Green Giant (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Little educational value per COM:EDUSE, mostly very dark, even the "D" is fuzzy. Green Giant (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test page, accidental creation Жаворонок Катерина (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Test page, accidental creation Жаворонок Катерина (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 21:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 22:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with no educational value per COM:EDUSE. Contradictory to have a copyright symbol in the filename and a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license? Green Giant (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE customarily allows small numbers of user photos of themselves but this is out of scope because it is not a photo of the user and is solely for use on one user's talkpage. Green Giant (talk) 21:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE customarily allows small numbers of user photos of themselves but this is out of scope because it is not a photo of the user and is solely for use on one user's talkpage. Green Giant (talk) 21:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a presumably non-free, copyrighted model with no evidence of the original author's permission or anything to suggest that this would be covered by freedom of panorama. LX (talk, contribs) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is owned by aika. I was given specific permission from her to upload the photo and put it out for use on this website. It should not be deleted. User: Mariahstein (talk) 13:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by a much more accurate file and not used any longer 86.195.117.32 02:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use in some archives. Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use on any page or project, superseded by far mor accurate design 195.220.213.3 17:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

use on different pages or project --164.215.89.154 13:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The Commons vandal Эрманарих has been reinserting this inaccurate file to prevent deletion. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 00:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, redundant to File:EPP Congress 5722 (8099348523).jpg.    FDMS  4    13:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: hardly own: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitJCM4nAJIoYWOW0SWDeM743f1C5bznoZrsSM8QWDKF9nIwQJrt3u5bzK1cd8wAxpzF2gbU-ODHo8ZCAy3kMozV6zMLvNW2vlvTePle1RL-YPZVTPz2sj2hz2yR9Fn6VRfe8u1hXRtKkoa_1TLol-3-O24h-NkC0QCQovXMke231rQs3V_1vcK80ehdcgyunviwHiFtbzKFeZceL2gElAWX95ZEZhuH9zyzxuVQDmYRm72ngnz2Q2Uk3WrPWe_1B1nZKux5Lia9kObeVF5OnUIRbqjm2iVz3qpVEjcRk6yNbr4vgOlMvMJ_1fYeAgJzazErT-Z3tDefGLzs5ZkSAWPbQNya51f3C6F5OHBz0AC82wWjyIuWS2216p1yrfG1htBRTX-nNPDGQmeRH0IkcrsoYB1SyKAAT2HXqGQ9ZeTme85mH3osg1UV_1onhdTPXsl5hOyXNkPYYX6odVQ1sVXnosXGCgJ4SC5uQbcJRlK7oouKLIl7biXrICUcTLeePVU-Si18pWl9ANyBirqScl5jZ7CEIqonQEK4DNnv7J82DFTx_1mEqhAuUefBhh49nEEyrZpe6kEByFsxvi3gaCD53db6o3lsOzrUUeQs-G7UCq3EkiMVLQcFONC7gx6a5uKuU0rvyV6L2HP2R4DwX40B2bhvCigbeiM079i6xAVuCcwGAYYIrkyNyjc9FWqMKqUoddMjG3t58Dc7fMIHZozUDDI3_1YqJvUyVdOXHbqYdTGLWC5PEpIlU-W1pi1PlIJIg_1xbJIwXuuUIXVcR0phI-OsNSpHwCM_1G9Kb18J_1-E5sPViUNawO8Nzgs2GE46DS0xQYR9RhUTyn1x6SlAZdVXl-ssSuTomM1-rX5LPwMxLM_16Lh6R7fVI-8MVKvb7nS2Gj8h_19OzVXKvoj5HMVQe34cqzz4qZe1-w_1TYUAf6rmwmt2VuIESxh67R8qmUlgjNmoAPwCC6hrtqwb8EcRx9Fd-wt0esR9A2k9gr_12jx-eeSUSt2DK6Ql6CohIibGv6kdrqpj0QlF_1xl2UCD-VNDYBSBpJHydDKTMvyOo1eAtETZE4YzFzwxxjCnPKxWjs9FRh6PrQRY03loGHvrDzcCTwp3asdGiHvik5pjktGYsa4w3EUuqn_1pd26NDEuIVoeqDvd92krD6D9QwpK6YEItARyvpY3LBjp4XvfPCa5O897zxGq9TvI9ve9O91rGdcS9Buy3gG3A439JDQImFsLD-ftQCTqxdtuju0HFWIEUJnksq4X_1gIwvbcUGIKYDRfM7ayn3VLmI-YAYjvKrXmYnJtOzhGqFcfIeQuE45e7Q9Gbz5AITMcekhbLwa56kpZHS4lY29ehpDYyxKwBAlKjQYMYytZfV51hxtS-wLEbaWUhrEt9ZvHBnUwooYlBsRq9vCTYUtoAKvNK4scH1qXD6YLEnUGRUocY272AWN_1wJCpZw83hmj_153jFuV4H-4YyFlRu-NugVEo8umv1bkN2Jr3FM_1JhLyN4w8nPG2TbJ23MH7DtA0YVA2vubh5UyAvrA19bVNy3IqfLu


Deleted: Imho com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deberia de aparecer todo en el idioma oficial del reino español 81.33.254.179 16:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of File:Anonymous emblem.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Virtually identical to File:Textbeispiel Grossschreibung.png, but there are slight capitalisation differences in the middle, and this causes the line breaks to be slightly different. This version is not used while the other is, so I'm guessing that this one is in error. Errors are often fine to host, but when it's a user-created image of pure text, the error text shouldn't be used and should be considered to be out of scope. Note If this one's actually correct and the other one's wrong, we should replace all usage and delete the other one. Nyttend (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, uploader is the subject of the picture. Permission from the author (the one behind the camera) would be needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email to the author asking for permission. Timboliu (talk) 11:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no evidence of permisison Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to create a new page about this person. XXsecolo (talk) 11:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to create a new page about this person. XXsecolo (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but unclear copyrightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free text (including a poem by the poet O. Župančič, who died in 1949) and a copyrighted map in the background. Eleassar (t/p) 10:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

… one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.????

Rispondo in lingua italiana.

Non capisco perché qualcuno insinua il sospetto che io abbia violato le regole del copyright. L'oggetto fotografato un a tabella informativa posta presso il monumento dedicato a coloro che furono torturati e uccisi dalle milizie collaborazioniste slovene durante la seconda guerra mondiale presso la collina Sveti Urh presso Lubiana. La tabella di pubblico dominio. Io l'ho fotografata personalmente con la mia macchina fotografica personale e l'ho caricata in wikimedia commons e non capisco in che modo tale mio contributo possa violare il diritto di copyright.
Cordiali saluti
--Kraškaburja (talk) 12:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TRANSLATED WITH GOOGLE TRANSLATOR:
I answer in Italian.
I do not understand why someone leads to the suspicion that I have violated the rules of copyright. The object photographed at an information table placed at the monument dedicated to those who were tortured and killed by the militians Slovenian quislings during the Second World War at the hill Sveti Urh in Ljubljana. The table in the public domain . I have personally photographed with my personal camera and I loaded in wikimedia commons and do not understand how that my contribution would violate the copyright.
Best regards
--Kraškaburja (talk) 12:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"La tabella di pubblico dominio" - this is, unfortunately not true. The poem by O. Župančič is still copyrighted, so is the map in the background, as Eleassar said. — Yerpo Eh? 11:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is no FOP in Slovenia Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution thumbnail of File:Anonymous emblem.svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Topic is completly blurry. The file is easyly repleaceable by File:Парк птиц (51).JPG. Abujoy (talk) 20:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The version in between must get deleted due to the fact that there is no valid license, source and author information 88.64.114.87 11:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 10:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for the nomination: Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture.????

Rispondo in lingua italiana.
Ho indicato nelle note che si tratta di monumento a Lubiana, ideato nel 1955 da architetto sloveno Vinko Glanz, morto il 20.2.1977. Monumento dedicato agli ostaggi fucilati dai soldati italiani durante la seconda guerra mondiale presso la Gramozna Jama presso Ljubljana. Il monumento di pubblico dominio. Io l'ho fotografato personalmente con la mia macchina fotografica personale e l'ho caricata in wikimedia commons. Non capisco perché viene negato il caricamento in wikimedia commons .
Cordiali saluti
--Kraškaburja (talk) 13:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TRANSLATION WITH GOOGLE TRANSLATOR:
I answer in italian language.
I mentioned in the notes that it is the monument in Ljubljana, created in 1955 by Slovenian architect Vinko Glanz, who died on 02.20.1977. Monument dedicated to the hostages shot by Italian soldiers during the Second World War at the Jama Gramozna in Ljubljana. The monument in the public domain. I have personally photographed with my personal camera and I loaded in wikimedia commons. I do not understand why being denied the loading wikimedia commons.
Best regards
--Kraškaburja (talk) 13:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not covered by FOP in Slovenia. Is protected 70 years ofter the artis's dead. Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, as the works of Rudolf Heinisch are protected til end of 2026. Images can be undeleted from Jan 1, 2027 on. Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need to delete the category Rudolf Heinisch at wikimedia commons as the copyright for the paintings of Rudolf Heinisch is with his surviving son Philip Heinisch who had given permission to wikimedia commons / wikipedia to publish all paintings of his father in a notification of 2012 or 2013.--Hermann-at-wiki (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide evidence of this permission. You were asked to do so in 2013 on your :de-talkpage[8] and again 2 months ago on your Commons' talkpage. Nothing happened. --Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the heir of the painter Rudolf Heinisch, his son Philip Heinisch had sent the requested e-mail and given authorisation to publish all works by his father on wikimedia commons. He is ready to do that again. Just give him a few days. Will it be sufficient to give authorization to publish all works which appear under the category Rudolf Heinisch or does each work have to be named ?--Hermann-at-wiki (talk) 22:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should ask the OTRS-volunteers at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard, as they handle permissions. After scanning through all files in Category:Rudolf Heinisch, I found what you did not provide over a span of 2 months after I had specifically asked you: a number of Heinisch works, uploaded in early 2013, carry ticket # 2013012210003652. You should provide that information to the OTRS volunteers. When you had replied on-time, you could have saved us a lot time. --Túrelio (talk) 22:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. The authorisation by the copyright holder of the works of Rudolf Heinisch to publish them on Wikimedia Commons should reach at permissions-de@wikimedia.org within the next couple of days. Thanks for the advice. --Hermann-at-wiki (talk) 23:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Authorisation to publish the works of Rudolf Heinisch on Wikimedia Commons has been sent to permissions-de@wikimedia.org on Sunday, 01 June 2014. Regards --Hermann-at-wiki (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending}}

OTRS-volunteer Krd has kindly added the OTRS-ticket to all images in this category, except:

--Túrelio (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Authorisation to publish

by Rudolf Heinisch on Wikimedia Commons will be sent to permissions-de@wikimedia.org within the next couple of days. Regards--Hermann-at-wiki (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted some and kept some per discussion Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is pretty crap, but shows the form and some details adequately. I hope to take a better one later and overwrite this. We are actually very short of Anglo-Saxon brooches, of which this is an important and well-known example, not otherwise on Commons. It is actually rather educationally useful, just not at all aesthetically attractive. Johnbod (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: okey Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A-S broochDSCF9259.JPG of the same object is much better & should be used instead (both are my pics). Thanks Johnbod (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 06:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own request ElmA (TalkMy filesE-mail) 08:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, image was uploaded in 2011 and is in use. Why do you want to have it deleted? --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It pains me to nominate this for deletion, but the claim of "own work" for a photo roughly a century old is absurd. Might be an heir (I notice that the uploader is named Maslov); might be public domain. I certainly hope we can sort this out, but I don't see how we can accept this with a false attribution of source. - Jmabel ! talk 00:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I notice that the uploader's work on our projects is entirely in Russian and almost entirely about the person depicted here. If someone with good Russian can get involved & do some active outreach that would be good. I don't know if he reads English, and I doubt he is monitoring his Commons user page since he only uploaded the one photo. - Jmabel ! talk 00:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Since it is 1915, it is likely {{PD-Rus-Empire}}. The uploader has the same name as the guy on the photo, and he is likely a distant family member, with the picture coming from the family archive (hence the own work claim).--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Most likely pd Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://10tv.nana10.co.il/Category/?CategoryID=600127
Since I have no idea what the actual text says I can't proove it for 100%.
The general quality however looks much like a copyvio. Moreover the photo style is the same.
If you look at the slideshow about one monitor size down you'll find these images
This DR also applies for

--D-Kuru (talk) 20:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been a category Nv8200p (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Los datos que se ofrecen son personales de las personas que aparacen son incorrectos, y a su vez la persona que redacto esta seccion no pertenecía al grupo de musica. 188.84.113.232 18:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We're still unsure if this account is Flickrwashing, even if it does appear to be official. ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see the LG's official blog? The website http://social.lge.co.kr/ obviously belongs to LG Electronics. At the bottom of the page (below the copyright notice), there is a link to the Flickr account. The Flickr account looks legitimate. (i.e., not just a fan creating a Flickr profile)--Puramyun31 (talk) 15:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I think that's all we needed (i.e. confirmation from an official LG source that it was an official account.) I think we can keep this now. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consider it withdrawn. ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright conflict; despite coming from a verified official source, @GalaxyOptimus: asserts that there is still a copyright issue with the picture, because he considers the UI depicted to be a seperately copyrighted work from the press image of the device itself, which is freely-licensed, even though they're both in the same image released by LG. (Disclosure: He uses this as an argument for the use of his own renders) ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC) ~[reply]

I think there was a case before here that I have read that ordered the removal of an interface to a mobile device and if im not mistaken the image is from Samsung's version of official social site. The consensus back then was remove the UI interface as the licensing for that is unclear despite the device being licensed by creative commons. This was the reason that other renders not created by me was stripped off with the manufacturer's UI and was removed or replaced with a free stock android interface as these are the ones that are either legal or truly free of use. Plus I think a new render is not an issue especially if it would depict the image better and in more legal terms. GalaxyOptimus (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You keep insisting there is a case yet you never can seem to find it. I do not trust your claim. ViperSnake151 (talk) 20:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. This is an image which LG has explicitly released. It is entirely safe to assume that the release covers both the copyright for the photograph of the device and the copyright for the image on the device. I cannot believe that LG released the former, but left the latter as a "gotcha" to trap users of the image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murals by Diego Rivera

[edit]

Above files from Category:Murals by Diego Rivera in the Palacio de Bellas Artes should be deleted. The murals are still copyrighted as the term hasn't yet expired. However, File:PBA Man at the Crossroads full view from above.JPG should be kept because of the distant view between the camera and many murals. --George Ho (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all per Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama#Mexico. The deletion request names no reason why this law shouldn't apply on those files. Also to keep steadiness in the decisions it has to be thought that similar cases like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paraninfo1.jpg were decided for "keep". --Julius1990 (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per Julius1990. --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 19:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The author died in 1957. Copyright term is 70 years after life, which is 2027. --George Ho (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But that is simply not the point here. Maybe you first should get informed about the legal situation in mexico before you act with deletion requests. I see again no argumentation about the specific legal situation. An admin should put this tragedy to an end and decide for keeping soon. --Julius1990 (talk) 05:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{FoP-Mexico}} is refers to usage in places where photography is publically allowed. The photos were taken inside a building where photography there may be forbidden. --George Ho (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You should read on the discussion page what a Mexican tells you about it, and i can just repeat it: For the "publically" in the case of Mexico inside or outside isn't the poit at all. You should take back the delation request, you show you have not the knowledge to ask for one. --Julius1990 (talk) 05:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is no FOP in Mexico for interior spaces FASTILY 10:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Undeleted (for now): The previous close was based on a conclusion ("There is no FOP in Mexico for interior spaces") that isn't even remotely correct. The closing admin even deleted the one image that the even the nominator agreed should be kept, without any explanation. I will leave the DR discussion open for the time being, to the extent that there is any discussion still to be had as to whether the conditions set out at Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama#Mexico have been met (in particular, whether photography is permitted inside Palacio de Bellas Artes). --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To remove the last doubt i contacted the Palacio de Bellas Artes. Like the information i already had, taking photographs of the murals is allowed. George Ho may prove his claim of the prohibition since he seems to know better than the employee of the institution itself. --Julius1990 (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - apologies for the first closure. I misread the Mexican FOP clause, believing it to be exclusively applicable to outdoor subjects (similar to German FOP laws). -FASTILY 22:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murals by Diego Rivera

[edit]

Above files from Category:Murals by Diego Rivera in the Palacio de Bellas Artes should be deleted. The murals are still copyrighted as the term hasn't yet expired. However, File:PBA Man at the Crossroads full view from above.JPG should be kept because of the distant view between the camera and many murals. --George Ho (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all per Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama#Mexico. The deletion request names no reason why this law shouldn't apply on those files. Also to keep steadiness in the decisions it has to be thought that similar cases like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paraninfo1.jpg were decided for "keep". --Julius1990 (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per Julius1990. --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 19:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The author died in 1957. Copyright term is 70 years after life, which is 2027. --George Ho (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But that is simply not the point here. Maybe you first should get informed about the legal situation in mexico before you act with deletion requests. I see again no argumentation about the specific legal situation. An admin should put this tragedy to an end and decide for keeping soon. --Julius1990 (talk) 05:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{FoP-Mexico}} is refers to usage in places where photography is publically allowed. The photos were taken inside a building where photography there may be forbidden. --George Ho (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You should read on the discussion page what a Mexican tells you about it, and i can just repeat it: For the "publically" in the case of Mexico inside or outside isn't the poit at all. You should take back the delation request, you show you have not the knowledge to ask for one. --Julius1990 (talk) 05:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is no FOP in Mexico for interior spaces FASTILY 10:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Undeleted (for now): The previous close was based on a conclusion ("There is no FOP in Mexico for interior spaces") that isn't even remotely correct. The closing admin even deleted the one image that the even the nominator agreed should be kept, without any explanation. I will leave the DR discussion open for the time being, to the extent that there is any discussion still to be had as to whether the conditions set out at Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama#Mexico have been met (in particular, whether photography is permitted inside Palacio de Bellas Artes). --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To remove the last doubt i contacted the Palacio de Bellas Artes. Like the information i already had, taking photographs of the murals is allowed. George Ho may prove his claim of the prohibition since he seems to know better than the employee of the institution itself. --Julius1990 (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - apologies for the first closure. I misread the Mexican FOP clause, believing it to be exclusively applicable to outdoor subjects (similar to German FOP laws). -FASTILY 22:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]