Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 2nd, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo from a newspaper website. Unlikely to be freely licensed 71.43.51.210 02:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: A google reverse image search shows that this image was first uploaded here in 2010. -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 12:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: @uploader: see com:otrs McZusatz (talk) 15:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Ukraine has no COM:FOP for modern 3D sculptures. This is a recent upload. Yann (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleting as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by PAC2 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This picture is extracted from a recent movie (2012). There is no reason why this movie would be in the public domain or under a copyleft license. |source= http://nocturnesproductions.net/documentaires-documentaries/adieu-godard-ou-lart-selon-jean-luc/ Yann (talk) 10:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I am the one who uploaded this file a year ago, on 01 April 2013, as I am the copyright owner. Indeed, the image file is extracted from the film JEAN-LUC GODARD, LE DÉSORDRE EXPOSÉ, which I am the producer of, as it has been produced by my company Nocturnes Productions SARL in France (of which I am the main shareholder). When uploading the file on 01 April 2013, I had originally granted a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license as well as a GNU Free Documentation License. Strangely enough, this file was fine until today, but now it has been marked for possible copyright violation and therefore might be deleted.
I would like to reassert that there is no copyright violation here.
Or is there a problem with the type of license I registered it under?
Please explain.
That would be greatly appreciated, as I would therefore certainly learn something here. Not knowing exactly what to do, I have also sent today a message to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org so as to re-assert the copyright ownership as well as the grant of CC and GNU licenses. Thank you for your help in this! --Raphaël Millet (talk) 11:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS ticket:2014040210005691 HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE - Personal unused -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 22:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, see w:File:Natalia Poklonskaya conference screenshot crop.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More from banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS NawlinWiki (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS NawlinWiki (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More by banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS NawlinWiki (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sock of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS NawlinWiki (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

istemiyorum Emrullahkoc (talk) 10:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France

russavia (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleting as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, no FOP in France.

— Racconish ☎ 18:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fountain on Place Stravinski in Paris at Centre Pompidou was created by Jean Tinguely who died in 1991, and Niki de Saint Phalle, who died in 2002. As there is no freedom of panorama in France (confer COM:FOP France) this means, unfortunately, that most of the images in this category have to be deleted.

Speravir 00:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lorraineereso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) vios from artists website / blog / pinterest, etc. pp. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Balmy10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Balmy10 (talk · contribs)

Downloaded from Flickr account used as a source of Flickrwashed copyvios; should be deleted according to the [[COM:|PRP|precautionary principle]]

Rrburke (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Account blocked. Yann (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Balmy10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Films posters, not own work

Cap1000 (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Balmy10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images is stolen from internet, not uploader own work. Examples: https://www.google.com/search?q=man&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJM_1WV4z6qoqcaiwELEKjU2AQaBAgXCD0MCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEij9D80amhzlH-Qf6xDFGuYflBDnH6c_1yy6rOvguqD-ULvQ66jr5Lq4uGjBcWkd3n8A_1F2_1vPjToJ7ltx5Nl9m49I1yGeVO2XqEeVPx5q7VLhRc5FLTHLF3wxCQgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBC5iVygM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio6-qtxZTPAhWnBZoKHci_CZ8Q2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979

https://www.google.lv/search?q=%D0%9B%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0+%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmwEJGcPwLS-NJywajwELEKjU2AQaCAgACBcIPQhDDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIoixqXH-IOiBqYH5Mf5xiBGZofvBntJdgxozykPOkw6zHyMcgxjzLyMBow3xI2PsbF0P9KrL5LUFeXLJfB7vpo_1P0OENMAlKSAcQLWc6PNAYJHXatsfVglPPaKIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgTklVwUDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjekr6sxZTPAhUIJpoKHX9iCKEQ2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979&gws_rd=cr&ei=lj3cV-vpCaPX6AT-n5qYCg

https://www.google.com/search?q=Raymond+Rushabiro&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlQEJEsryS-6rYLkaiQELEKjU2AQaAgg9DAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIoux_11GrofoxuiG54Qhhm9H7wf9BrqOqc_19DrLLus6qzqoP94uri7MLhowTHNRiuyGW69MkHo7Iz4XziuoB5qDmzF0CSn5e9ZLAe2_1CtyNhLRLKma0w_1wR0WbuIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRtYFsJDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjB2v-lxZTPAhXME5oKHRRACJ0Q2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979

https://www.google.com/search?q=Michael+Wawuyo+Jr.&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJ7O7cqtmKnc0aiwELEKjU2AQaBAg9CEIMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEii0Gpoc5R-KELUaiRDfH64f5B_1qH6c_1-C6rOuo6yy7-Ot4u9DquLqg_1GjDJam94L9RzN09XE0lLgK4_1FboDiq_1wQ82mJBGs_1kIB7dAKJziknBwpdoCBDj-ONBsgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBA56l34M&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiyrJKgxZTPAhXCJJoKHZsjC58Q2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979

https://www.google.com/search?q=Фильм&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJDT-2WTTJ7O0aiwELEKjU2AQaBAgICD0MCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEijKHMUc5gTGHMkc1ByeG58bhhHwGag66jqpOu06qjrZLa4uqzreLpMuGjD-meapeVThncuBKoDh1rmZ5GZDwCQhCJpGp4QcP8qA_1sOdJAmnDJhtCnl2yK3PWGsgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBEzMSO8M&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifjv2OxZTPAhUiGZoKHWt6BqAQ2A4IGigB&biw=1920&bih=979

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgrefurl=https://kamukamapolly.wordpress.com/2015/07/07/veteran-actor-rushabiro-impresses-in-film-debut/&tbnid=feyCodQX1VH_CM:&docid=rgs1czo_Gba58M&h=1632&w=2464

Cap1000 (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, heavily posterized, personal photo. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 08:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of dubious educational/encyclopedic value, hence out of scope... also of dubious copyright status (see here) - it may have been flickrwashed in 2008, when reviewed by FlickreviewR. Storkk (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: promo photo which could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cindamuse as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=221641848024470&set=pb.157979307724058.-2207520000.1396427436.&type=3&theater Yann (talk) 08:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This might be {{PD-Art}}. Let's wait from the uploader's answer. Yann (talk) 08:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Artist was born in 1972. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 08:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: promo photo which could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, described as "Portuguese: Cover of the magazine INEDITO..." this magazine cover is unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused person photo Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: Image contains the watermark of a website. -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 11:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Supposedly a recent photo of someone born in 1988. Obviously not, and of no educational value. Certainly out of COM:SCOPE, and possibly hoax/vandalism on frWiki. Storkk (talk) 11:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is my personal photo Dhananjay00919220890710 (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising surely? Out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COM:COPYVIO as larger version of this same gif was found here, uploaded by robokoboto. That website clearly says that the content copyright remains with the uploader, no indication that the image creator and the uploader to Commons are the same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still under copyright PierreSelim (talk) 06:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality photo, impossible to determine the subject, unused. Out of scope imo Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another copy of the photo has a 20th Century Fox copyright notice. We hope (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. 20th Century Fox marked theirs copyrighted. CBS published a version to promote their airing of the movie. CBS did not mark their publication as copyrighted. Any 'official' version without proper notice should be public domain. We could continue to host it as pre 1977, no-notice, and let Fox/CBS battle it in court as to whether the CBS version was condoned by Fox for publication without proper notice. I think we are covered unless Fox contacts WMF for a DCMA takedown.--Canoe1967 (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) image Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, as per the url -but being claimed as own work Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Sealle (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not available at source. Copyright claim is "It's just a picture of a person, nobody can lay copyright claims on those things." Possible copyvio Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncropped copy of photo has a copyright notice. We hope (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment According to the PD tag (which is the same one it had on English Wikipedia before I transfered it to Commons), this is PD because it wasn't renewed, not because of a copyright notice. I quote from said PD tag, {{PD-US-not renewed}}: "although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed". I'm certainly no expert on copyright, but I think we need to check the renewal status of this photo. Michael Barera (talk) 23:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The film was renewed:
  • Type of Work: Motion Picture
  • Registration Number / Date: RE0000163869 / 1983-04-05
  • Renewal registration for: LP0000007249 / 1955-10-29
  • Title: Rebel without a cause. By Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc.
  • Copyright Claimant: Warner Brothers, Inc. (PWH)
  • Variant title: Rebel without a cause
  • Names: Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc. Warner Brothers, Inc.
But if you look at the photo with copyright information, it shows a 1961 copyright for United Artists, not Warner. Haven't been able to find out how this photo was issued in 1961 by UA and was hoping doing a DR might clarify the photo's status. The site where it came from won't help-Visitor agreeement. "We've spent a lot of time preparing these scans, so please don't use them for personal gain. You're free to download them, but that's it. Please send us an email if you would like to use any photos or other content on our site for commercial purposes." We hope (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for your research on this one, We hope. I was hoping that you'd find something more clear. I'm not sure what to do at this point: do you think we should delete it per the precautionary principle? Michael Barera (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes the film company will make enough changes to qualify for a new copyright (thus extending their "hold" on it) and then re-release the film. You see some re-releases at IMDB, but they're outside of the US and some years after the 1961 United Artists copyright on the copy of the photo. Warner is shown releasing it in the US on home view media with nothing on the page about UA. I think I'll leave the decision up to the admin who'll read this after a week. We hope (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Source of file reads "You're free to download them, but that's it." ... Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 10:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because there is no indication of the uploader being the owner of the file. The image was released via singer Lady Gaga's Twitter account and unless an OTRS is provided, this cannot stay as a free image in commons IndianBio (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: possibly an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's own art, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of someone's eye; better images exist at Category:Blue eyes. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: As per nom russavia (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, from Getty Images, see here marked with photographer's name and copyrighted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: possibly an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful "own work" but a press photo - (See photo at Argentine Todo Music website). - Fma12 (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistaken download. I do not have the rights to this file. Sat-Electric (talk) 07:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots from unknown sources JeanBono (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: .. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a duplicate of File:Wawel Cathedral, Czartoryski Chapel.jpg Leoboudv (talk) 07:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: deleted by another admin Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, album art from here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, album art from here, reversed which makes it a COM:DW. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LargsThistle17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Six of uploader's photos were blatant copyright violations. Of the six others of lower quality, one was watermarked by the photographer, and I am nominating the remaining five photographs - they all lack EXIF, they don't seem to have been taken using the same camera, and user has demonstrated enough lack of knowledge of copyright and commons policy to delete under the precautionary principle.

Storkk (talk) 12:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Maybe I am naive, but how the hell do I go about putting a picture up on one of my football team's pages without being caught by you? All I am trying to do is show my clubs photographs to help raise awareness and bring new supporters to our games and I can't do this because you keep putting them up for deletion. I'm trying to do a good thing... — Preceding unsigned comment added by LargsThistle17 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 2 April 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Commons would welcome any photos that you took yourself, if you could convince the community that that was the case. Uploading other people's work is usually a violation of copyright, and cannot be hosted here. Please read the relevant policies at COM:Copyright, and if you are the photographer for any photos, or can get the permission of the photographer to license them under an acceptable free license, please read COM:OTRS. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omarossaadoss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 08:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rvplpr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greenboi95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader's own drawings, poor quality, not used, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 08:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DJ WesOne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edpeterson919 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader's own drawings, poor quality, not used, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evanilda adolfo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio, http://cozinhandocomangelina.blogspot.de/p/galeria-de-fotos.html and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1d82DXOAQ0

Wer?Du?! (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimitri barral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Crop Circles- Genoma ET..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.46.26.160 16:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dimitri barral

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. 83.46.26.160 16:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No realistic educational or encyclopedic value, unused on any sister project. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of dubious copyright status. Storkk (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a copyright-protected software program KDS4444 (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is missing correct author information and/ or has an incorrect copyright tag. KDS4444 (talk) 03:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only in spam page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And while we're at it, can we get the user's other uploads? (File:DVD FULLVERSION1.jpg , File:Rouletteoptions.png, File:Roulette book3.jpg, File:SUPER SECRET SOFTWARE.jpg, File:Revisedlogo1PhotoshopByMP-871.jpg, File:ArmandTESTIMONIALS.jpg, File:Protected by Romanian Law.jpg, File:GuaranteeBoxRed1.jpg, File:Gruppoitalia.jpg, File:ArmandAdrian2.jpg, and File:WhatYouCanExpect.jpg) (also, could the user be blocked as a spammer? Note that the metadata is all full of spam details.) DS (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is 552x720 and - as expected - is all over Facebook, see here. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 09:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low quality and missing metadata make this unlikely to be user's own work, and a likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use on enwiki -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Tineye search shows this image which was created and published on 2010-09-04. -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 12:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, labeled to indicate vandalism, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has possible copyright issues; also, unclear of its educational value (see COM:SCOPE). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no date, unlikely to be user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIO. In use on a page with a poorly phrased caption and no apparent connection to subject matter, possible pranking. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No acceptable according PD-Text/Logo Aga (d) 04:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 22:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is given both as "youtube" and "own work", possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly a copiviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm suspecting that this is a copyvio. This image was uploaded on 1 April 2014, but it already existed online in January 2010. See tineye search. -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 11:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 22:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Notable person:
Do you need help finding out images which are actually out of scope, Leitoxx? Seems that you hare having difficulties in finding good ones. -- Tuválkin 00:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Image is cropped from here, dated January 21, 2014, prior to this upload, it appears to be a copyvio, not out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 09:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyviol: gmaps screenshot reworked. Advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" without EXIF 91.66.153.49 05:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, sketch drawing of non-notable musical group, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable Discussion-Board. Logo way outa scope. Weissbier (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot reworked. Ciaurlec (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is this? See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://rtvdezwaluwen.nl/ Pompidom (talk) 13:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIF, the photographer is Roberto Moclan Gomez. There is no indication Manofergu (talk · contribs) is this person, or can otherwise license the file under a cc-by-sa license. Uploader, if you are Mr. Gomez, please carefully follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 09:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 91.66.153.49 05:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Movie poster. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Images finds this all over the place. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuelitopati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who are these people? See COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kashif sultan acter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, unclear if it's of educational value (see COM:SCOPE) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guardandovi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder and can release these under a CC license. Uploader: if you are the copyright holder, please carefully follow the steps on COM:OTRS so that we can keep your contributions!

Storkk (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person seems to be a Fabián Mendoza - this image is probably a copyvio and is on the web, but I cannot immediately find an original source. Storkk (talk) 16:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 27 results for this name (almost only social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends 80.215.171.148 12:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

¿Cuál es el motivo por lo que me borran el archivo?

Rolando YÑIGO-GENIO Contáctame 17:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

 Delete per nomination. Clearly not in scope. Kathisma (talk) 22:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, low quality => no use Antemister (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorporates a non-trivial logo as well as this image, which are both unlikely to be the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 15:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film is from 1930. It's not immediately clear why this is PD. Storkk (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

use the more accurate svg Antemister (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joan Miro died in 1983. FOP in Spain applies to "Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares", so museums seems to be excluded. BrightRaven (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totally true. I've been talking with the museum that owns the work, and they are considering to permit a CC copyleft. Meanwhile, It would be better to delete the file. Thanks for your comment! ; )

I do not think the museum can grant any authorization to publish this work. Only Miro's legal successor can do it. BrightRaven (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good and very similar to File:Proud as a Peacock.JPG Pierpao.lo (listening) 22:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have reuploaded the image with the appropriate license and references as illustration to the wikipedia article of the artist. Guardandovi (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture was "on outdoor display at the Royal Alberta Museum, as part of their Alberta Centennial Sculpture Exhibition in 2005", so it is not permanently situated in a public place or building as required by COM:FOP#Canadian FoP. BrightRaven (talk) 11:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: we have plenty of other images of sunsets in a forest. Eleassar (t/p) 18:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of no educational or encyclopedic value, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improved version available Antemister (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a newbie, can you please make a reasonable DR!?! I guess an admin unfortunately closes just these DR. PS. I would vote for an admin for you. -- Perhelion (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Perhelion: In the very most cases, such a reason suffices to get an images deleted, so I save time with this. The complete text here might be: A new version, drawn closely according to a official government depiction, is available. The file is completely replaced, so a deletion of this one is adequate.--Antemister (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wouw* Then I think admins (User:Multichill...) hate me or are frustrated and vote all keep on me. I've vote dozens (of ~50px bitmaps!!!) to delete because official vector images are existing (an I've all separately linked!) and my 800px reworked official image get deleted after a SVG autotrace!!!User talk:Perhelion#File:Wappen von Obersülzen.png So could you vote all this for me again to delete??? Commons is so annoying. -- Perhelion (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the medal LGA talkedits 07:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-04-02T09:09:23‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 26 results for this name (almost only social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends 80.215.171.148 12:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

¿Cuál es el motivo por lo que me borran el archivo?

Rolando YÑIGO-GENIO Contáctame 17:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

 Delete per nomination. Clearly not in scope. Kathisma (talk) 22:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment « no article on any wiki » is wrong that there is es:José María Delfino Carpené. Maybe − probably? − this article is to delete on es.wp. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy SVG, orphaned. Leyo 23:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wieggy as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The picture is wrong. I made a bad mistake, it's not Blumenower Straße 2-5 --Wieggy (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

However, according to COM:CSD only files younger than 7 days can be speedydeleted on author request. @Wieggy: Did you know you can request the file to be renamed?    FDMS  4    15:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very ugly, large and unused, there is a perfectly good picture at File:Cartellieri 1913.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-04-02T11:55:25‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image already in use. Notably, Google Images turned up a *reversed* version of this as a similar image, and a comparable resolution version is already in use; this one is in that website's upload folder dated *2008*. If this is the uploader's work, need OTRS permission for well-established image. However, as background-info-light image from a typical single-uploader, this is probably a copyvio.

(Google auto-translate into Spanish); "Ya en uso de imagen. Cabe destacar que Google se presentaron a * revertido * versión de esto como una imagen similar, y una versión de resolución comparable ya está en uso, lo que uno se encuentra en carpeta de carga de ese sitio web de fecha * 2008 *. Si esta es la obra del cargador, necesita el permiso de OTRS para una imagen bien establecida. Sin embargo, la imagen de fondo-info-luz de una típica-Registro único ya que, esto es probablemente un copyvio."

Ubcule (talk) 12:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a work that has an author's name, unlikely to be uploader's own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts Flickr uploader is the copyright holder of this non-PD logo …    FDMS  4    15:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free cover art of album IndianBio (talk) 17:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like image was copied from http://www.sylviastuurman.nl/motor/mijnmotoren/derbimulhacen/en/ Jarekt (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also complaint about it at File talk:Derbi Mulhacen 659.jpg. --Jarekt (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

use the one with the correct ratio Antemister (talk) 14:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

completely replaced Antemister (talk) 20:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping, file deleted by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping, image was deleted by another, closing nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a 1930 Czech film. Not immediately clear how this is PD. Storkk (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quelle gelöscht Ralf Roleček 05:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

This is an edited version of my graphic: http://www.helicopterpage.com/images/parts.jpg 68.12.254.228 22:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: I edited the original request to encompass all the derivative versions I could find as well. It's a great image that has been on Wiki since 2006 and Commons since 2008. However, the image was/is noted to be based on the image that the user above linked to and most of it looks like simple tracing with a few minor changes. This would make it a derivative work of a copyrightable schematic diagram. Looking back at the website as it was in 2006, there was no special notice suggesting it wasn't under copyright at that time. Therefore, despite how long it's been here, I agree with the original request + derivatives unless the uploader can give a good reason as to why it's not infringement. The Haz talk 21:24, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Template:Vote properly credit: I am the originator of the graphic. As long as the graphic is properly credited to www.helicopterpage.com (My Web Site) then I see no reason why it can not stay. I do not have an issue with it being here as much as I have an issue of the proper due credit not being given for the origination of the graphic. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.12.254.228 (talk)
    • Could you please send a notice of permission from your website email address to the email address listed at COM:OTRS? We need a license that allows unlimited use for any purpose including in modified form, such as the {{Cc-by-3.0}} license, which does require proper credit. Please give a link to the file on Commons in your email. Thanks for your willingness to let these works stay here. darkweasel94 07:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this image is user's own work. Text on it appears to have been added by a typewriter making it an older image, but not likely much older than the early 1960s from the typeface and spacing of the text. Unlikely to be user's own work, and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, not in use Antemister (talk) 12:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dan Gallard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

more "own works" by a notorious thief and liar

91.66.153.49 06:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoaxing, read the description. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from the gallery website, poster and alleged copyrightowner not the same either Jimfbleak (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claude Stephany Chanteur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without descriptions, categories ...

91.66.56.64 18:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ant.da (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I cannot understand the issue. I personally took some of these pictures (File:Arcangelo VIII.JPG which is the last I uploaded is included). Others were given to me directly from the person in the picture who explicitly authorized me for the uploading. Do you want them to upload the file personally? And of course I have more than a camera and a smartphone. Finally some of these picture are there since the last year. Please let me know if something has changed because I am not aware. I look forward to receiving your further considerations if any. But please let's consider the files one by one. Just to be accurate. Best regards,

--Ant.da (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please send evidence of permisison to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping, files were deleted by another admin Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG duplicate of our SVG image. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination.Kathisma (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptures by Alexander Archipenko in an exhibition in Ukraine. There is no FOP in Ukraine. Alexander Archipenko died in 1964.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've restored this image as it was initially deleted as "no permission" and we indeed received an OTRS ticket. However, a discussion related to COM:SCOPE is needed. This appears to be a promotional image (see content and uploader name) for INAPORTNET. The related article on id.wiki is pending deletion (with support) and the uploader is blocked there as a promotional account.

Эlcobbola talk 20:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama exemption in Ukraine. A bunch of these file have been tagged {{NoFoP-Ukraine}} for a long time, so am nominating most of the category. Not currently nominating File:2005-08-15_Maidan_Nezalezhnosti_Kiev_261.JPG (which survived a DR last year). For all of the nominated files (with the possible exception of File:Zaporizhzhya_-_Bridge_over_the_Dnipro_river.JPG and File:Kpt Jan Nalepka Ovruc UA.jpg), the artwork in question does not seem de minimis to me.

File:FC-Shakhtar-Donetsk-Info-Center.jpg withdrawn per NickK, see below.

Storkk (talk) 13:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete everything. And Wikimedia Commons, too. Just in case. There could be some violations of some kind. Orthodox copyright priests would find something on any image. Or may be it is not about copyright totalitarianism? What do people do who don't know what to do with their life? They write deletion requests. --C.G. (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: This meant  Keep. --C.G. (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 4 Keeps, 3 Deletes, too many files to consider as a unit. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Ukraine

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Славутич-Арена.jpg is questionable as well. XXN, 22:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, this is rather ill-prepared and messy-styled request one can even find disruptive. I warn you to abstain from doing so again. Any file of mentioned above can be renominated for deletion separately, depending on age, matter and other characteristics of the original work depicted. --Sealle (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep as above, it's a good, sharp photo, interesting subject, the finger can & has been cropped. ALSO: obvious point, but since we now have a derived work, we need to keep access to the original for licensing... Lx 121 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoaxing, read the description. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AitorClaramonte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own works". One photo with an autograph of the real photographer

91.66.153.49 06:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Biltseweg 31 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atsje (talk • contribs) 2014-04-02T16:56:53‎ (UTC)

 Keep You can request a {{Rename}} of it. --JuTa 18:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Renaming is much too difficult.Atsje (talk) 13:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Thanks for renaming. Atsje if you have any questions feel free to ask them at my talk page. Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United Kingdom FOP in Scotland does not cover 2D artwork.

LGA talkedits 07:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chintan Bakiwala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping, files deleted by Natuur12 Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fendoo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, text only. Should be recplaced with wiki markup.

Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Bar.png - The Commonwealth Games Federation is a UK based organisation and this is way over the COM:TOO for the UK (and most of the rest of the Commonwealth) given the rulings of the UK courts in relation to other logos for example this one. LGA talkedits 07:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC) Also :[reply]

LGA talkedits 07:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another penis... Threecharlie (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo not in use. Out of scope. A file with the same name was previously nominated and deleted. Joshua (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 01:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Two different files with the same name have been uploaded and deleted, all uploaders have been different, but with similar name. I smell sockpuppetry. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at least the wikipedia logo is copyrighted 91.66.153.49 06:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Doubtfull, and seems out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mati7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of these images claim "CC sharealike" or "CC public domain", but the linked sources give no evidence that they've been licensed under these terms.

Uploader already uploaded this rather more probable copyvio of a press agency photo (Rex Features via the Guardian) as a "CC Attribution" image, which suggests that he/she doesn't understand the issue of licensing.

Some of the older images *may* be usable due to the copyright having expired, but that's something the uploader- if anyone- should know.

(Automated translation into Polish for possible benefit of uploader); "Większość z tych zdjęć twierdzą "CC ShareAlike CC" lub "domeny publicznej", ale związane źródła podają żadnych dowodów, że już licencjonowana na niniejszych warunkach.
Uploader już przesłane to raczej bardziej prawdopodobne copyvio z Press Photo (Rex Features przez Guardian) jako "CC Attribution" obrazu, co sugeruje, że on / ona nie rozumie kwestii licencji.
Niektórzy ze starszych zdjęć * może * być użyteczny ze względu na prawa autorskie wygasł, ale to jest coś, uploader-czy ktoś, powinien wiedzieć."''

Ubcule (talk) 19:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these images are in books which I have. I will contact with the publishers and ask for licensing. If images are uploaded into a web page I will ask them too. Please wait a couple of days before deleting these files. Mati7 (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The images will probably remain up for a few days (at least) until this nomination is closed.
However, I assume your comment ("I will ask for licensing") means that you did not already know whther the images were free or not? If so, they should not have been marked as "CC" or "public domain" (free) licenses.
You cannot upload images and *then* ask for permission- that's not how it works.
We must also be sure that the website owners are the copyright holders for the images. For the older photos, it's possible that they are not.
Of course, the copyright on the older images may have expired anyway. But we still need to know that for sure, and it's the uploader's responsibility to know- and explain why- before uploading.
The photos that you took yourself should be okay, and have not been nominated- thank you for those.
Ubcule (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Files can be restored after permission is granted via com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason to believe the PD-GermanGov license might be valid for this image. 77.184.175.248 20:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alte Version Petit8 (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason given for deletion Krd 18:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 09:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AnaGT Krd 16:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

N'est plus d'actualité Dapress (talk) 18:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No reason to delete this image of Christophe Collignon. BrightRaven (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice in metadata image is stated as Copyrighted "Copyright holder CHRISTOPHE COLLIGNON", no apparent connection to uploader whose other photos all have real metadata. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Renominating because previous nomination was for COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyvio per nomination. --Krd 16:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has never been published by the author under a free license, free license was added later on by an unaffiliated user, see [1]. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 17:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Back in 2005 license templates did not even exist, but uploads were required to be under GFDL. Adding license templates to existing images is how Wikipedia solved this problem. -Nard the Bard 18:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    FYI, this is no longer accepted practice and has been found to be problematic. DÜP is going through old images and tagging the ones which were uploaded without a license tag and later re-tagged by a different user as this is simply not a valid license. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 17:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI: The user (which is still active sometimes; once per year) uploaded taged another selfshot image as 'Bild-PD' and a more recent one as 'Bild-frei' - so it seems unlikely to me he would tag this map under a more restrictive one not suitable for commons if you asked him. --Hardscarf (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, AGF on uploaders behalf. Kameraad Pjotr 20:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this map shoes practically nothing... Antemister (talk) 10:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:DG Kongo Karte.png --Krd 16:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image was taken during the filming of the documentary "A Whisper to a Roar." At the time, Appleseed Democracy Documentary LLC owned the copyright to all the material collected in the process of filming, including this image, and Ben Moses is a member of the LLC. Subsequently, the copyright was transferred to Fondation Moulay Hicham, for which Appleseed Democracy Documentary LLC acts as agent in regards to exploitation of the Foundation's copyright. We are in the process of obtaining authority from the Foundation to license the image on the Wikipedia site, and will be complying with the demands set forth by Wikipedia post haste.

We've re-uploaded the image to a higher resolution version and it now includes EXIF data, as per the deletion request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Appleseedent (talk • contribs) 20:45, 2 April 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the OTRS permission which is consistent with the above statement.--Sphilbrick (talk) 23:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission Krd 16:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no proof that this emblem is really used outside the flag. As long we do not have it, the image cannot stay here. I removed any use Antemister (talk) 10:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid reason for deletion at all.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 01:10, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 19:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

after having a look into several sources, it turned out the depiction of South Kasai is complety wrong here, see the new map below. That means this one has to be deleted. Antemister (talk) 10:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 19:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

although this map is based on a usually reliable source, the depiction of South Kasai is complety wrong here, see the new map below. That means this one has to be deleted. Antemister (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 19:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]