Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![10 File:Hector Riveros con el supuesto "Actor" de --American Pie-- 2014-01-27 14-23.jpg](#File:Hector_Riveros_con_el_supuesto_"Actor"_de_--American_Pie--_2014-01-27_14-23.jpg){kind=link}
![17 File:Bio--Born Omotayo Otitoju on May 11, "he" is a graduate of English Language from the university of Ilorin with a passion for versatile music- He grew up in Lagos listening to a myriad of indigenous and foreign 2014-01-29 22-56.jpg](#File:Bio--Born_Omotayo_Otitoju_on_May_11,_"he"_is_a_graduate_of_English_Language_from_the_university_of_Ilorin_with_a_passion_for_versatile_music-_He_grew_up_in_Lagos_listening_to_a_myriad_of_indigenous_and_foreign_2014-01-29_22-56.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
..jpg){kind=link}
)))_--_2014-03-16_22-33.jpg){kind=link}
![201 File:Tóth László "Lecsó"-Trombitaművész- 2014-03-17 01-05.jpg](#File:Tóth_László_"Lecsó"-Trombitaművész-_2014-03-17_01-05.jpg){kind=link}
![257 File:Benjamin Luzolo, o autor da frase "te vejo na estrada-" 2014-01-29 12-47.jpg](#File:Benjamin_Luzolo,_o_autor_da_frase_"te_vejo_na_estrada-"_2014-01-29_12-47.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_2014-03-15_16-08.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 13:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted as part of cleanup and per nom russavia (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low-quality version. Fry1989 eh? 01:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Martin H. (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope, not a private photo gallery TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Own work or work of the subject? Description is confused. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is my work - kind of a selfie.
tatsuotoko (Talk) 12:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I nominated it for deletion on the grounds that "tatsuotoko" is by no means an obvious pseudonym of "Matthias T. J. Grimm". If you are who you say, fine, no need for worry. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am new to this stuff - there was a picture of me since about 3 or 4 years (on my german Page). And yes, Tatsuotoko is my pseudonym - meaning "Dragonman" in japanese.--Tatsuotoko (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I can confirm that Matthias T. J. Grimme and Tatsuotoko are the same person. And the picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Matthias_T._J._Grimme.jpg shows him.
- If you google "tatsu otoko Matthias Grimme" you get a lot of hits :-) for example: [1] [2] [3] [4] (in german) -- DorisAntony (talk) 00:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Some doubt that the depicted person is indeed the player Conner McDavid[5]. Might be a hoax. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sockpuppeteer uploading random selfies grabbed from the web with hoax descriptions Martin H. (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sockpuppeteer uploading random selfies grabbed from the web with hoax descriptions. Martin H. (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sockpuppeteer uploading random selfies grabbed from the web with hoax descriptions. Martin H. (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sockpuppeteer uploading random selfies grabbed from the web with hoax descriptions. Martin H. (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
HtZw&'jjēpÿ 74.59.141.17 23:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo with big watermark in middle and without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
yes you are, but unfortunately that doesn't qualify you for beeing within COM:SCOPE Indeedous (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, not big, no metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Ozan Vatan 1986 da Adana da doğdu 2003te Ramazan Atıl Anadolu Lisesini bitirdi 2013 te Pamukkale Üniv- Physics bölümünü bitiridi bir yandan senaryo eğitimlerini tamamlayıp hikaye dalında bölgesel bi 2014-01-29 19-35.jpg
[edit]
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, missing metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Bio--Born Omotayo Otitoju on May 11, "he" is a graduate of English Language from the university of Ilorin with a passion for versatile music- He grew up in Lagos listening to a myriad of indigenous and foreign 2014-01-29 22-56.jpg
[edit]
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo, the uploader's only contribution. The author's name in EXIF data and uploader's name are different. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
didn't want to upload it Polyglot (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily, because uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
didn't want to upload it Polyglot (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily, because uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
copyvio; not own work and copyrighted CyberXRef☎ 04:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious own work: satellite photo. Stefan4 (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Speedily deleted, obvious copyvio uploaded en masse rubin16 (talk) 10:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
i no longer want it online. Stockhausen (talk) 07:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
i no longer want it online Stockhausen (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's request. Four men behind tablefootballtable, looking into camera and smiling. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Internet type meme, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Yann due to licensing problems. This was the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to missing camera data. Files quality is usually bad. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to missing camera data. Files quality is usually bad. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
appears to show a CD cover Rybec (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Sorry, I had meant to tag the file with {{Copyvio}}. Rybec (talk) 20:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily due to licensing problems. The file needs OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
i uploaded the same PhoenixBerlin (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, apparently Phoenix means, that (s)he uploaded a cropped version of this File:Yasser Elshantaf at CeBIT 2014.JPG, which is in my opinion worse than the nominated photo, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
A lot of Google logos are already present here Category:Google logos Aga (d) 10:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, bad quality and small size (232×76 pixels). Taivo (talk) 16:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tohma as duplicate (Dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Vischer - Topographia Ducatus Stiriae - 297 Pettau - Ptuj.jpg — billinghurst sDrewth 10:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures. I suspect sculptor's copyright violation Taivo (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep The statue was dedicated August 8, 1888. Before tagging a US sculpture for deletion, it is often helpful to check SIRIS, http://siris-artinventories.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?uri=full=3100001~!11906~!4, which is a pretty good inventory of US sculpture. It also is a good idea to look at the WP:EN article on the sculptor, Karl Gerhardt (1853-1940). His dates immediately suggest that the work is pre-1923. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Two words: Common. Sense. This statue is well beyond the 75 year S.O.L., as mentioned above. It is part of the Gettysburg Battlefield Historic Site. It is photographed thousands of times a day. Someone is getting WAY too fastidious with the copyright guidelines. DoctorJoeE (talk) 02:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- While I agree that this DR was ill-advised, Common Sense has little to do with copyright. Being part of the Gettysburg Battlefield Historic Site and being photographed thousands of times a day have nothing to do with copyright status. 75 years is nowhere near old enough to assume that a work is out of copyright -- in the US it's 91 years at the moment (1923) and in many other countries 1888 is right on the border. Note that if this work had been in the EU, it would have been under copyright until 1/1/2011 -- only three years ago. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, thank you, Jim. (Estonian proverb: Something happens to he who does, nothing happens to he who sleeps.) Taivo (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, uploaded for promotional intent. In addition, I do not consider the logo a simple one due to background. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
bad quality Yase-olga (talk) 12:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily with reason "Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file". Taivo (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
file was replaced by another Yase-olga (talk) 12:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong formula, replaced by Basic Black 2.svg. Yikrazuul (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
bad quality Yase-olga (talk) 12:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily with reason "Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file". Taivo (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
file was replaced by another Yase-olga (talk) 12:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio: Image has an "engadget" watermark on it. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader is serial copyright violator. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
copyright violation LNK Group (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. I delete also copy of this File:Classicstructure.jpg, because this is also copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
copywright violation LNK Group (talk) 13:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. I delete also copy of this File:LNK Group.jpg, because this is also copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
No EXIF, small size, bigger copies on the web. Yann (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope. see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miguelmerida Indeedous (talk) 10:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Self-promo image uploaded by sockpuppeteer. INeverCry 17:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
It is a photograph of me for which I did not sign a release form or consent for publication. I am unhappy with images of me being published on the net. 86.144.219.214 09:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Looks like a posed shot in a public location. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I uploaded this image and strongly agree with Lindsay Seers. I hope it is possible to remove the image. There was a misunderstanding regarding the agreement with Lindsay Seers about using this image. --Mraitmaa (talk) 10:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I work in the same institution. Uploading the image really was a result of a misunderstanding. As we want to be a reliable partner to artists and wish to release pictures of them (with permission) in the future as well, I wish this image to be removed. --Sanahirviö (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This is posed shot in public place. The subject's consent is not needed, the subject's protest is not a reason to delete. Commons has OTRS-permission to host the photo and it is even used. Free licenses are irrevocable. Sorry, reality bites. What to do now? Please upload a better photo, of course also under free license. This does not guarantee deletion of old version, but maybe the others start to use the new photo instead old. Taivo (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per [6] "The subject, photographer or uploader of an image may request that it be removed from Commons. The reasons for removal may vary from: it causes embarrassment, was published without the required consent, etc. Generally, images are not removed simply because the subject does not like them, but administrators are normally sympathetic to removal requests if good reasons can be given. " Finland laws shown on same page show that consent is required for the picture to be published, and comercially used (with exceptions of course). In this case with the request of the subject, and the need for photos taken in Finland to have the subject's consent for publication, this image is removed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
no content, no encyclopedic value, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I could not understand, what is depicted, until I looked filename and description: blur. Exactly. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor CHEM MOS ("2" should be subscript) and file format/layout overall (jpg, large white margins). Unused, have File:SilacyclobutaneParent.png that is same chemical with modern format/layout details. DMacks (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Roxxy McQueen is the owner of-Roxxys Star Cosmetics a Skincare company that specializes in all natural and outstanding vegan -Skincare products- Roxxy hand makes 125 flavors of The Best Lip Balm In The The Wor 2014-03-16 12-26.jpg
[edit]
self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, bad filename, self-promotional file, also small file without metadata, so copyright violation is possible. Quality is bad. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Incorrect structure; poor format (jpg). Have File:Vat Red 29.png DMacks (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused and poor technical details (CHEM MOS, some atomic geometry, and file format); have File:Vat Blue 36.svg DMacks (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Incorrect structure; poor format (jpg). Have File:Vat Green 1.svg DMacks (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor fileformat, and with unusual background that interferes with reuse. Unused, have File:Acid Blue 25.svg DMacks (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed, but I don't think it was a good idea to draw “–ONa” instead of “–O− Na+”. --Leyo 18:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agree that the ionic form would be better. Thanks for pinging the creator of that. DMacks (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hey mates, I have fixed it. BR, --Yikrazuul (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agree that the ionic form would be better. Thanks for pinging the creator of that. DMacks (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I suppose, that it is safe now to close the nomination. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality photo with too much noise. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, I do not consider the quality exceptionally poor. The file is used in 5 projects (not to count en.wiki) and therefore quality is not a reason to delete. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
This image is identical to images from the Royal Caribbean Press Center and the Quantum of the Seas Multimedia Press Kit that are copyright Royal Caribbean International. Ahecht (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily due to copyright violation. The file needs OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 20:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Leyo 21:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, quite bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope. Unused Flickrworker (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small file without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Courtesy Deletion request at OTRS 2014031210011915 - Deletion request by subjects in photograph Ronhjones (Talk) 21:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, unused personal photo. In addition, small size and no metadata. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Steve Pena, Daniel Pacheco & Brent Everett @ SOBE in Houston on 10-22-11. AYE MIRA!! (6279346886).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Courtesy Deletion request at OTRS 2014031210011915 - Deletion request by subjects in photograph Ronhjones (Talk) 21:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete We do not generally delete images at the request of the subject. However, the copyright is not clear and it is not in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo. In addition, small photo without metadata, watermarked. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope. Unused. Flickrworker (talk) 21:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope. Unused Flickrworker (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, misleading filename, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because this file is worse in colour than file:Dreifaltigkeit (1a).jpg Rollroboter (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request, almost-dupliacate. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Scope and possible copyvio Flickrworker (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, girl sits on ground, leans on cylinder-shaped haystack and plays a guitar. Bad composition, missing camera data. Unused, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete – Unused file with no educational value. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 08:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small, bad composition, no camera data. Taivo (talk) 14:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
As a copyright violation. Taken from a textbook, yet then claimed as cc-0. Aspects of design in presentation of image — billinghurst sDrewth 22:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
As a copyright violation. Taken from a textbook, yet then claimed as cc-0. Aspects of design in presentation of image Jolozaga (talk) 23:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep File:Amino Acid Graph.png and delete this file as crap version. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete both as copyvio, smack uploader for misrepresenting licensing (others of his uploads may have similar problem). Have File:Titration Glycin.png that illustrates the same basic concept. DMacks (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, both. A lot of his uploads consist ©. I delete them all. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, attack photo (words "big loosers"). Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope? Unused Flickrworker (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
This baseball player is imitating Irish stepdancing, badly, in parody. This is incredibly offensive to actual Irish stepdancers. Bluebird Blvd. (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Commons delete's because it's offensive and a parody. Nope can't find anything in the guidelines about that. Flickrworker (talk) 22:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, I do not believe, that the photo is offensive. Even if somebody considers it offensive, this is usually not a reason to delete it. Commons needs photos about parodies also. And Commons has whole categories for things considered offensive by a lot of people, for example, Category:Anti-Christianity and Category:Criticism of Islam. This is the only Irish dance parody photo in Commons and so valuable. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution, inadequate description. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism purposes, no use to project. discospinster (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Sockpuppeteer uploading random selfies grabbed from the web with hoax descriptions. Martin H. (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
misleading. Ozone does not look like that. All three atoms should be equally joined together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ingvald Straume (talk • contribs)
Comment I am not sure. I opened Category:Ozone and there were a lot of files, which looked like that file. Are they all erroneous? I ask some competent persons to help. Taivo (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- See en:Ozone vs. en:Cyclic ozone. --Leyo 00:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- As Leyo says, ozone indeed usually has the bent-chain form. It's an easy mistake to make when one only thinks about, for example, trying to keep all the atoms neutral rather than charged, but that is sometimes one of the least important concerns in overall stability. DMacks (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The chemical structure of ozone is depicted correctly in this image. See Leyo's links to articles on enwiki that describe the chemical structure. Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, the file is correct. In addirion, it is used in no.wiki. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
This is a wrong model of an ozone-molecule. The Oxygene atoms of an ozone-molecule does not group like that. Ingvald Straume (talk) 13:59, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing this out. I am would be willing to delete this as you are the uploader. However, it is currently still used at no:Ozon. Could you replace it there by a more suitable image? Even incorrect diagrams get deleted only if they are unused. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hm... I just note the comments from the previous deletion requests. I suggest to discuss this first with other experts. Once it has been resolved that this image is inappropriate and when it is not being used, we can delete it. Until then you are free to tag this image with {{Disputed chem}} and elaborate your concerns on the associated talk page. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept for now: Please discuss this first and re-nominate once you can show us consensus that this is indeed incorrect. Now tagged with {{Disputed chem}}. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the image used on the poster, and from which this image is allegedly derived, is free of copyright. Sitush (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
"Previously published: google images" Stefan4 (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Same file as the previous nom. Natuur12 (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harvey.Parker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Salamuddin Shaikh.jpg
- File:Salamuddin SEO.jpg
- File:Salamuddin SEO expert.jpg
- File:Salamuddin SEO Specialist.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moices Stars (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ladygessmar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.
- File:Lady Gessmar.jpg
- File:PLUMAS & TACONES oficial.jpg
- File:Portada La Reina Araña.jpg
- File:EVOLUTION-Electronic Music.jpg
- File:PORTADA LA RECETA NATURAL FC.jpg
- File:1606540 10202998578516238 1363821692 o.jpg
- File:1556532 10202952498124257 1666547995 o.jpg
- File:1495378 608519842529256 138133701 o.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
May proceed to erase thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladygessmar (talk • contribs)
Deleted, unused, not big, probably out of scope. Photos have no metadata. Some files have Facebook filename and watermark. Now are all her uploads deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering mass copyvio via User talk:Daewooboi. Usually the uploader resized and/or cropped the files (hiding watermarks etc.)
- File:Coaster in Pakistan - K, Range.jpg
- File:Niazi Express parked at Stop-over.jpg
- File:Niazi Express Nippon Japanese bus.jpg
- File:Sialkot Daewoo Station.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luisf bc17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 20:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by Platonides with reason: "Out of scope, unused personal images". Now are all Luisf's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandra Otamendi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 17:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, beautiful girl in bikinis, but I delete the photos due to small size and missing metadata, quality is also not the best. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
User uploaded various photos stolen from other websites with false claims of own work. I doubt that the photos listed here are self-created, most likely they are also from the web, i.e. from panoramio.com or other websites.
- File:Evan.crk.u.Pančevu.jpg
- File:Crkva-u-Sivcu.jpg
- File:Kragujevac SRB.png
- File:SerbianMetrovagonmashTrains.png
- File:Solaris.u.Beograd.jpg
- File:Nis Grad.jpg
- File:Islam-agina džamija.jpg
- File:CacakGrad.jpg
- File:PancevoGrad.jpg
- File:SuboticaGrad.jpg
- File:NoviSad2013.jpg
Martin H. (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
So many copyvios in the upload, hard to believe much, if any, here is freely licensed.
- File:Zorana Mihajlovic.jpg
- File:Milos-teo.jpg
- File:Politika.jpg
- File:Belgrade sky.jpg
- File:Serbian railways.jpg
- File:Beog1.jpg
- File:Beograd-wiki.jpg
- File:Plandište wind park.jpg
- File:Zorana-mihajlovic.jpg
- File:Kanc-za-eu.jpg
- File:SerbianViza.jpg
- File:Z.Mihalovic.png
- File:Screen Shot 2015-12-09 at 5.30.39 PM.png
- File:KragujevacCrkva.jpg
- File:Tanja Miscevic.jpg
- File:Srbija-eu-zastave.jpg
- File:BeogradTramvaj.jpg
- File:JORGOVANKA TABAKOVIĆ.png
- File:NationalTheatreBelgrade.jpg
- File:Grad kragujevac.jpg
- File:Niš 1.jpg
- File:SrpskiPasoš.jpg
- File:Zemun 1.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File:BeogradTramvaj.jpg, as it's only appearences on-line are from Wikipedia and ripoffs thereof. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Likely from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=42647266&postcount=3, another from the user that's taken from elsewhere.
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope images.
- File:2nd cloud for THS homepage.png
- File:My Destiny Homepage Cloud.png
- File:Jacob and Me.jpg
- File:I Protect Edward.jpg
- File:New Lib.jpg
- File:Transparent Library.jpg
- File:LibPic.png
- File:Fadded picture of library.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, all files are out of scope and not big, photos have no metadata. Quality is often bad. Now are all his contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Blaze 2014-01-31 05-23.jpg
- File:Blaze 2014-01-31 05-22.jpg
- File:Blaze 2014-01-31 05-21.jpg
- File:Blaze 2014-01-31 05-20.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, also bad quality. Now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Randywalker03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]private images, out of scope
Indeedous (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused images of a non-notable singer.
- File:Caratula - Dopas Mc - Revolución Mental 2da Edición (2014).jpg
- File:Caratula - Dopas Mc - Discografía (2013).jpg
- File:Caratula - Dopas Mc - Revolución Mental (2011).jpg
- File:Caratula - Dopas Mc - El Baúl (2007).jpg
- File:Caratula - Dopas Mc - Soy Chileno (2007).jpg
- File:Dopas mc.jpg
- File:Logo dopas.png
- File:Dopas.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jespinos (talk) 21:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused files, mostly small, uploaded with self-promotional intent. Photos have no metadata. Now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sal melissari (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused private images, self-promotion, out of scope
- File:Sal Melissari con il prof- Schiacca pittore di fama mondiale -Presso windsor&blain majoliche d'arte Reggio calabria 2014-03-14 16-41.jpg
- File:Sal Melissari presso duomo di Milano investitura a cavaliere del sacro ordine dei poveri cavalieri di cristo 2014-03-14 16-31.jpg
- File:Sal Melissari - 2014-03-14 14-59.jpg
- File:Sal Melissari e il serenissimo gran maestro della Massoneria gianfranco pilloni 2014-03-05 18-09.jpg
Indeedous (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private images, out of scope
- File:Simon Timhede 2014-03-15 09-31.jpg
- File:Simon Timhede 2014-03-15 09-30.jpg
- File:Simon Timhede 2014-03-15 09-15.jpg
Indeedous (talk) 00:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The statement "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license" is strongly dubious. No valid source information provided. Likely copyvio. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the photo correctly? Taivo (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The photo is claimed own work, but uploader's and author's name in EXIF data are different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of 2 images (File:Derawarfortbwp.jpg + File:Library Bahawalpur.jpg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
See COM:DW. Stefan4 (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
image used only for promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- This also applies to File:AutoMiddleEast in May 2010.JPG, File:AutoMiddleEast in November 2012.JPG, File:AutoMiddleEast in November 2013.JPG, and File:AutoMiddleEast in July 2011.JPG. DS (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Abhijeet ovalekar- -37 year old Indian architect and photographer- -Lives in mumbai - 2014-03-16 07-42.jpg
[edit]
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio: Exactly identical higher resolution image available here. Google Reverse Image Search provides dozens of hits, many having a greater resolution than this image on Commons. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without EXIF data. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 10:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope and how is this usable? Flickrworker (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
double of own work Turris Davidica (talk) 09:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Most probably not own work, no date, bogus license. Yann (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Straightforward reproduction of copyrighted box art. This will require permission from the company. The uploader has stated that previous deleted file(s) relating to Almax products have permission of the company, but was told that OTRS will be required to confirm this (see here).
I suggest that we give the user the chance to arrange OTRS permission, or at least show that it has started. If permission not received within reasonable time, we can delete as copyvio as per usual.
Ubcule (talk) 00:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is either an inaccurate badge icon, or a derivative of a non-free work. Either way it shouldn't be used in articles, as it is either misleading or a copyright violation Werieth (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Sculptor information must be provided to determine statue copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader stated on discussion page of this request: "picture was edited by the adam ebbin for congress campaign and is indeed posted with permission." Please look at OTRS and send this permission into Commons, otherwise it is difficult to prove, that the permission exists. Taivo (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
See COM:FOP#Belgium. Stefan4 (talk) 19:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope. Unused Flickrworker (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work: {{Imagewatermark}} and http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://pp.vk.me/c303309/v303309879/5c24/vrFQhGaFWTU.jpg&imgrefurl=https://vk.com/search?c[name]=0&c[section]=people&c[school_country]=158&c[school_city]=1902438&c[school]=1721215&h=100&w=100&tbnid=JjpPG96KNUOD6M&tbnh=80&tbnw=80&zoom=1&usg=__Me8HeTc6QpDuIyPq9nBzeB2VbWc= Stefan4 (talk) 16:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication on developer website that this software is released under the GPL or any commons-compatible license. Storkk (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication that this software is released under a Commons-compatible license. Developer website seems to be here. Storkk (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality. Unused image. Flickrworker (talk) 21:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image Flickrworker (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion scaled-down black-white copy of this File:Compagni Teatrale Dritto e rovescio.jpg. Some persons on the photos can be notable actors, but as they are unidentified, cannot be sure. The files have no metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication on the developer website that a commons-compatible license applies. Storkk (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused userphoto. Stefan4 (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Dileep Nair- Chairman, North East Frontier Technical University -Chairman- The Automobile Society India- 2014-03-16 23-48.jpg
[edit]
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Scan of table of text; replaced with wikitable at its usecase pt:Equação de Van der Waals DMacks (talk) 04:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused freehand diagram claimed to be an electron micrograph; there's lots that can be said about the en:Membrane contact site#Plasma membrane - endoplasmic reticulum contact sites but this doesn't illustrate any of them. DMacks (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Contact site.JPG appears to be the same image (different lighting for photo/scan of same problematic original). DMacks (talk) 04:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Several images of this across the internet. Can not be certain that it is own work Flickrworker (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The same decision should be made for copy of this File:Diana mashkova.jpg. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication on developer website that any of the elements of this screenshot are under a commons-compatible license. Storkk (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope and probably copyvio Flickrworker (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality photograph, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Taivo (talk) 10:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Club Penguin in-game sprite, copyright Disney. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work: professional portrait, no EXIF, small size, copies on the web. Yann (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
http://thestar.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/07/05/2012070501167.html (kiyiseuteu offer 사진 : 김수현 / 키이스트 제공) Puramyun31 (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of 2 images (File:Entrance to Iqbal Stadium Cricket Faisalabad.jpeg, uploaded by Changz + File:District Court, Faisalabad.jpg, uploaded by Banglap) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 10:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Updated: Affected is also File:Faisalabad ClockTower.jpg per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Faisalabad ClockTower.jpg.
- Gunnex (talk) 10:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Photographs of 3D frames need permission from the photographer. Stefan4 (talk) 15:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused in personal pages Ciaurlec (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused userphoto. Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
http://thestar.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/07/05/2012070501167.html (kiyiseuteu offer 사진 : 김수현 / 키이스트 제공) Puramyun31 (talk) 19:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be "own work". Damiens.rf 17:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Fake all over, no encyclopedic use imaginable. Prüm (talk) 20:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader claimed on his user page, that he is 27 years old. So it cannot be own work. I add for deletion File:Two German soldiers.jpg due to same reason: impossible claim for own work. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be "own work". Damiens.rf 17:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 06.2009 by Fast track (talk · contributions · Statistics) (who's uploads I am currently "cleaning", see full details at User talk:Fast track) this file is most retouched & derivated from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/4874242 (2007, © All rights reserved by pakaviator). Note that the yellow flag in the middle and the violett/red flag on the left side was removed, but the other flag elements (and current positions) are identical as also the man in blue clothes entering the airpot. And if you look closer, a rest of the flagpole of the yellow flag is still visible as also the shadow of violett/red flag in the window of the building. Gunnex (talk) 11:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation: see here. No evidence of ownership provided, no valid source information provided. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Image appears on numerous websites, for example here, but seemingly only in lower resolution. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
The image was taken by the photographer for Martin Vetterli (on the picture) himself. We have the full rights to use it. Please tell me if you need more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirkobischofberger (talk • contribs) 2014-03-17T15:22:49 (UTC)
- Then make sure that the photographer follows the instructions at COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Small image without metadata, probably TV screenshot. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF, copies on the web. Also included its derivative File:Mark Lewis Jones headshot, 2009.jpg. Yann (talk) 15:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
http://thestar.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/07/05/2012070501167.html (kiyiseuteu offer 사진 : 김수현 / 키이스트 제공) Puramyun31 (talk) 19:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted image of company logo, no evidence of ownership. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, unused Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The photo is big and has camera data. There are only few photos in Category:Vaginal use of objects. I consider the photo in scope. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, a Google reverse image search makes it highly unlikely that the uploader is the original file creator or copyright holder. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very unlikely to be "own work". Damiens.rf 17:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 05:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
The source/license and author information of 4 images used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user (2x uploads = 1x copyvio). Affected montage (will receive a separated DR): File:Montage of Lahore's Architecture.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, picture can also be found here and here but could also be close to the original upload date. Perhaps precautionary principle should be invoked? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Anyway, there is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan and this is a modern building. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
)))_--_2014-03-16_22-33.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)))_--_2014-03-16_22-33.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
)))_--_2014-03-16_22-33.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
)))_--_2014-03-16_22-33.jpg){kind=link}
I strongly doubt that the flickr user is the photgrapher. The only photos on her photostream taken with the same camera (Nikon D3S) are in the photo album sampling of spring summer 2013 collections. The album description ("love these") shows already that this is not the upload of a photographer but of a fan. The album contains various photos from different events taken with different, very expensive cameras while the rest of her uploads, mostly private images, is taken with amateur DSLRs. Another photo [7] from mentioned album is taken with a Nikon D3S and contains a name in the Exif which shows that photos from that album are not created by the flickr uploader. A case of Flickrvio. --Martin H. (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Found it. Its this photo from VOGUE. --Martin H. (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The uploader claims to be the copyright holder. However, the name in the {{Information}} template contradicts with the name in the EXIF. Stefan4 (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
http://thestar.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/07/05/2012070501167.html (kiyiseuteu offer 사진 : 김수현 / 키이스트 제공) Puramyun31 (talk) 19:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France, but this seems to be a modern sculpture. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of 1 image (en:File:Rawalkot 3.jpg = copyvio via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/76224, 2006, all rights reserved by "Sher Afzal" versus uploader en:User:Wol786: "I am Murtaza Javed") used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 07:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The author is Userphotog176, but uploader is Dvregent123, who claimed it own work. An explanation is needed about possible copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The logo is claimed own work, but this is not a simple logo. I suspect copyright violation. In such cases OTRS-permission is needed. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted model; it is not clear as to whether the model was permanently installed within a country where FOP covers artwork. Gazebo (talk) 06:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader's main language is French, but in French-language countries are usually no freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The source page on Wikia seems to indicate that the image is from a copyrighted book (The New Essential Guide to Alien Species) and is being used on Wikia under US fair use. Gazebo (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation of company logo. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
unknown band, self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is the wrong coat of arms. Eventually, the Romanian Government [approved (Romanian Government resolution 952/2013) approved a slightly different design, with the rocks colored in silver, not gold. As such, this design is not exempt from copyright. —Andrei S. Talk 11:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie character shown Gazebo (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:DW: this photo shows a Duquesne University ring. Similar files have been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:College Class Ring.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:High school ring.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Madison High School (Richmond, Kentucky) class ring (1976).jpg). Rybec (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
_class_ring_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 04:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: advertising Rybec (talk) 03:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This person only ever held statewide and not federal office. It is unlikely that this image was created by a member of the federal government. Mackensen (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation of multiple website logos. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Taivo (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted company logo, no evidence of ownership, no valid source information provided. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 13:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: advertisement Rybec (talk) 04:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work, see http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.filharmonia.hu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/T%25C3%25B3th-L%25C3%25A1szl%25C3%25B31-232x155.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.filharmonia.hu/programjaink/berletes-sorozatok/&h=155&w=232&tbnid=j0kevBif_WJ1CM&tbnh=124&tbnw=185&zoom=1&usg=__ltClYcf23lwIakKI__bzFlU8qiY= Stefan4 (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
![16:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/03/17#c-Stefan4-2014-03-17T16:24:00.000Z-File:Tóth_László_"Lecsó"-Trombitaművész-_2014-03-17_01-05.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 05:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
![05:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/03/17#c-INeverCry-2014-03-24T05:04:00.000Z-File:Tóth_László_"Lecsó"-Trombitaművész-_2014-03-17_01-05.jpg){kind=link}
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in United Kingdom for texts and 2D works, even if permanently installed in public place. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Most probably not own work: watermark, small size, no EXIF, copies on the web. Yann (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Would be good stock photo, but small size and missing metadata make me suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No FOP in France Kyro (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
This building is older than 70 years, which is the limit of license time. So this photo can only be asked to be deleted by progeny of architect with moral rights laws --Silex (talk) 10:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- This is not Wikimedia Commons's policy. Cf Commons:Freedom of panorama/fr. There be released under a free licence the Architect has to be dead for over 70 years. Kyro (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete en.wiki says, that the architect en:Auguste Perret died in 1954. That means, that the building is protected with copyright until 2024 (70 years from death). But the building has another architect also and it is unknown, when he died. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- About the other architect, he is dead two years sooner Gustave_Perret and was the brother of first one. Regarding the building, seems the licence apply to the architect, not the build like i thinked, my bad. By the way, there should be a way to put this type of picture on hold for some time until the time passed, since it's in ten years... Or for wikipedia to lobby to obtain the right to have a FOP exception. --Silex (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The file name suggests that this comes from w:Habbo and therefore probably needs permission from the creator of Habbo. Stefan4 (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work. Tom and Jerry were created in 1940 by William Hanna and Joseph Barbera, so are still in copyright. William Avery (talk) 14:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
recent PDF, not used. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of various paintings by a painter who is still alive. Stefan4 (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Low resolutions and missing (or no valid) EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
Jespinos (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion her recent upload, File:Rosa-amarela-2014.jpg, due to same reason (small photo without metadata). Taivo (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Private images. Unused, out of project scope.
- File:ALEXANDER-TANKO1978.jpg
- File:AnaGauna1999.jpg
- File:AnaGauna1997.jpg
- File:AnaGauna1992.jpg
- File:Moveball.gif
GeorgHH • talk 11:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Qual é o teu problema? GeorgHH? Esses arquivos são meus, eles estão dentro do meu profile. Eu sou usuária deste projeto desde 2006. O idioma utilizado em todos os meus arquivos é português-brasileiro. Ana Gauna (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The first is too small to have any use. The next three are photos of the uploader, so she is not the photographer and does not have the right to license them. Also, they are unused personal files. The last file I kept -- might be useful. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Anuvarshanw
[edit]Anuvarshanw (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
They are out of project scope as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:CamiloIT
[edit]CamiloIT (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:ArmasLinaresProvince.png
- File:EscudoLinaresProvinciaPequeño.png
- File:Maria Eugenia.gif
- File:Maria Hormazabal.jpg
The photos are small and have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. The coats of arms are unusably tiny. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Bnavis100
[edit]Bnavis100 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload a bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 14:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Santoshkumarbudakoti
[edit]Santoshkumarbudakoti (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Santosh1.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti1.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 001.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 003.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 004.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 005.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 006.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 007.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 008.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 009.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 010.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 011.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 012.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 013.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 014.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 015.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 016.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 017.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 018.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 019.jpg
- File:Santosh Budakoti 020.jpg
They are all out of project scope as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
seems to be a private image and would be out of scope in that case Indeedous (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cozmik Owl Gang Ent. (talk · contribs)
[edit]The "parental advisory" mark suggests that these are covers of some kind of product.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Jeflion
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by Jeflion (talk · contribs):
- File:Chowk azam.jpg (small photo with no metadata)
- File:Garden-51-Beautiful-Free-Pictures.jpg (small photo with no metadata)
- File:Garden-85-Beautiful-Free-Pictures.jpg (small photo with no metadata)
- File:Jafar Hussain.JPG (unused personal photo)
- File:Jafar Hussain1.JPG (unused personal photo)
I suspect, that three first of them are copyright violations and two last are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aldry laguna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Hafez agina
[edit]Hafez agina (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
Two of them are personal photos. Once the file is erroneously claimed own work, but this is actually copyright violation (or at least better license is needed). All files are unused. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Usamabravo
[edit]Usamabravo (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading two personal photos with bad quality. One of them is used on the userpage and other nowhere. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope.
Deleted: INeverCry 05:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work: historical images.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Photo was taken by José Demaría Vázquez "Campúa" and we are managing his legacy. We want to start setting some images as Creative Commons for them to have a wider spread. We begun with this photo also because there's no photo of this politician uploaded at Wikipedia and Google mixes him with other man with the same surname. Campua (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- As it is not your own work, make sure that the photographer (or his heir if the photographer is dead) follows the instructions at COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Balochi tamur
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by Balochi tamur (talk · contribs):
- File:Baloch film maker and writer "Dr Haneef Shareef"..jpg
- File:Balochi film DranDeh.jpg
- File:Balochi Films.jpg
- File:Balochi Tamur,Balochi Films.jpg
- File:Great Baloch actor Saeed Shad.jpg
- File:Great baloch actor Saeed Shad with great poet Meer Umar Meer.jpg
- File:Haneef Shareef.jpg
- File:Ijaz Baloch.jpg
- File:Ijaz Baloch (actor).jpg
- File:Ijaz Baloch actor.jpg
- File:Mani Petha Brath Nesth (Film).jpg
- File:Saeed Shad.jpg
- File:Saeed Shad (actor).jpg
- File:Saeed Shad (Artist).jpg
- File:Saeed Shad Baloch actor.jpg
- File:Saeed Shad the Baloch actor.jpg
- File:Sarfaraz Mohammad the Baloch actor.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
They are not big and they have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Confusedfarista
[edit]Confusedfarista (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Rabindra Building - Faculty of Business Studies.JPG
- File:মার্কেটিং বিভাগ, রাজশাহী বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়.jpg
- File:দিনাজপুর মেডিকেল কলেজ.jpg
- File:নিউ গভঃ ডিগ্রী কলেজ এর ভবন.jpg
- File:বিজনেস স্টাডিজ অনুষদ.JPG
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload a bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly?
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
seems to be a private image and would be out of scope in that case Indeedous (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 16:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Dermeval Correa de Andrade
[edit]Dermeval Corrêa de Andrade (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Aldeia Indígena Itaóca - Mongaguá - São Paulo.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 1.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 3.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 4.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 5.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 6.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 7.jpg
- File:Barcelona - Espanha 8.jpg
- File:Bolívia.jpg
- File:Capa Wiki.jpg
- File:França.jpg
- File:Guiné-Bissau - Africa 1.jpg
- File:Guiné-Bissau - Africa 2.jpg
- File:Havana - Cuba.jpg
- File:Lima - Peru.JPG (logo is not de minimis and surpasses threshold of originality, copyright violation)
- File:Lima - Peru 1.jpg
- File:Luanda - Africa.jpg
- File:Prof. Dermeval Corrêa de Andrade.jpg (small photo without metadata)
First group. The user has traveled in a lot of countries and uploaded a lot of photos about himself. I consider them all out of project scope. All files are unused.
- File:Educação Social Transformadora.jpg
- File:Freud - O último outono.jpg
- File:Livro Psicologia da Ideologia.JPG
- File:Livros DCA.jpg (so small collage is useless, out of project scope)
- File:Psicologia de Ideologia.jpg
- File:Zumbi -quando os escravos se revoltam.jpg
Second group. Book covers, author is the uploader, so licenses are OK, simply out of scope. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haasblogphotos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Shuonan Chen.jpg
- File:Rosemary hua.jpg
- File:Melanie Cernak.jpg
- File:BWIB, Ellen Tauscher Matsui center.jpg
- File:Mansie Cheung.jpg
- File:Hillary Le.jpg
- File:Kiron chandy.jpg
- File:UGBA193i - Haas Innovation Lab.jpg
- File:Twitter HQ.jpg
- File:Berkeley Women in Business, Career Contessa, Laura Goodwin.jpg
- File:Photo by Fredrik Aaserud.jpg
- File:Rafy Choi, Denice Sy, Solomon Darwin, Kenny Yu.jpg
- File:Ban Bossy - Denice Sy, Tracy Yang.jpg
- File:Sung Shin.jpg
- File:Twitter BWIB.jpg
- File:Cristina Torres Gonzales.jpg
- File:Berkeley Women in Business for the Philippines - Haiyan Typhoon.jpg
- File:Denice Sy, Tishianna, Lila Shahani, Dominique.jpg
- File:Lila Shahani and Denice Sy.jpg
- File:Erika Nelson.jpg
- File:Brian C Ly.jpg
- File:Berkeley Women in Business with Ellen Tauscher.jpg
- File:Denice Sy, New York.jpg
- File:Denice Sy, Class of 2014, UC Berkeley.jpg
- File:Alyssa Tio at Facebook.jpg
- File:Denice Sy, Ellen Tauscher.jpg
- File:Denice Sy, Ming Cong, Sunny Huang at FSF 2014.jpg
- File:Lila Shahani.jpg
- File:Sean Go.jpg
- File:Michael Teez.jpg
- File:Sergio Ruiz Tello.jpg
- File:Alok Garg, Solomon Darwin, Maria Solomon, and UGBA193i Class (Spring 2014).jpg
- File:Alok Garg at I-Lab.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ZaytsewaMarusy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per User talk:Hinopak (2x copyvios from Youtube-videos) most likely grabbed & screenshotted from Youtube, especially from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZBE2Ls7jSw (2009). Example: File:Hinopak Karachi 5.jpg = ~05:05 min or File:Hinopak Karachi.jpg = ~4:35 min.
- File:Hinopak Karachi.jpg
- File:Hinopak Karachi 2.jpg
- File:Hinopak Karachi 5.jpg
- File:Hinopak Karachi 6.jpg
- File:Hinopak5.jpg
- File:Hinopak3.jpg
- File:Hinopak2.jpg
- File:Hinopak1.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Tlocc1
[edit]Here are both files, uploaded by Tlocc1 (talk · contribs) and not yet nominated for deletion:
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload a bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Staffan Engström (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all credited to different people, sometimes companies and authorities. The uploader can't be the copyright holder to all of them. No evidence of permission.
- File:Riksintresse 2013 in Sweden.jpg
- File:Sverige -13.jpg
- File:Putnam 1.jpg
- File:Vindkraftverk i Sverige.jpg
- File:Hedbod. vindpark.jpg
- File:Hönö.jpg
- File:Vindhjul.jpg
- File:Näsudden 1.jpg
- File:Nordic 1000.jpg
- File:Maglarp.jpg
- File:Kalkugnen.jpg
- File:Umy 100m 500m mindre a.jpg
- File:Rev riksintressen 2012 b.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emilyhpark (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolutions and PNG format. The images are likely not own work.
- File:LDsubzero.png
- File:LDhighpoint.png
- File:LoriDennisLAconfid.png
- File:LDVerizon.png
- File:LoriDennisCambria.png
Jespinos (talk) 20:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Screenshots of NewTek LightWave
[edit]
I can find no indication on developer website that the product is compatible with commons licensing requirements. --Storkk (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PCP considering User talk:Monash and logs. For File:Lab1.jpg a 2002 version (watermarked) is available via http://www.startimes.com/f.aspx?t=33417151 (2013) = http://im32.gulXXXXXfup.com/WjXqr.jpg (last modified: 2002). Obs.: delete XXXXX from image source (spam filter issue)
Gunnex (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 05:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TENERIFEWEEK (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scanned 2015 year books. I dont have idea why CC BY SA- all is copyrighted
- File:Poemario Cantado de un duende alado.pdf
- File:Poemario Cantado de un Duende Alado III.pdf
- File:Poemario cantado de un duende alado II.pdf
- File:Manual Fotografía Aplicada.pdf
- File:REFLEXIONES DE UN DUENDE.pdf
- File:Palabras de mármol.pdf
- File:Frío Infierno.pdf
- File:Artículos Determinados 2015.pdf
- File:100 Frases para intetar SER FELIZ.pdf
Cap1000 (talk) 18:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
AUTHOR'S RESPONSE
Files uploaded by the artist Ángel Suárez-elduendesuarez from my account : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TENERIFEWEEK
I have all the rights of this work published
IMPORTANT:
These are NOT scanned books are ORIGINAL books written by me, and posted by me too, Ángel Suárez-elduendesuarez from my account :https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TENERIFEWEEK, of which I have all rights and share freely from my account with everyone through this wonderful platform. This complaint is misplaced. PLEASE, Cap1000 BEWARE ABOUT THINGS LIKE THIS, BECAUSE ARE OFFENSIVE TO AN ARTIST.
I hope my work is not deleted because it would affect my freedom as an author to share free my work with the world.
And I try to promote culture and has educational purposes
Thank you very much
User:TENERIFEWEEK (talk) 09:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TENERIFEWEEK (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded by the artist Ángel Suárez-elduendesuarez from my account : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TENERIFEWEEK
I have all the rights of this work published
IMPORTANT:
These are NOT scanned books are ORIGINAL books written by me, and posted by me too, Ángel Suárez-elduendesuarez from my account :https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TENERIFEWEEK, of which I have all rights and share freely from my account with everyone through this wonderful platform. This complaint is misplaced. PLEASE, Cap1000 BEWARE ABOUT THINGS LIKE THIS, BECAUSE ARE OFFENSIVE TO AN ARTIST.
I hope my work is not deleted because it would affect my freedom as an author to share free my work with the world.
And I try to promote culture and has educational purposes
Thank you very much
User:TENERIFEWEEK (talk) 09:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- So first, just in case, part of you uploads already has been deleted. Second. If you really have all rights for publication, its cool and this nomination no problem for you. Please read Commons:OTRS and just do recomendations from this page step-by-step and all for your contrib will be OK. I wish you good luck. Best regards, Cap1000 (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: please contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khalil538499 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work of information booklet.
- File:P3030129PYE-PE14T-MERLIN.JPG
- File:P3030128PYE-PE14T-MERLIN.JPG
- File:P3030127Pye Radio-PE14T merlin.JPG
- File:P3030126Pye Radio-PE14T merlin.JPG
- File:P3030125Pye Radio-PE14T merlin.JPG
- File:P3030124Pye Radio-PE14T merlin.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaki chreif (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xtechi no sama (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danilo Palomer Santiago, the painter is still alive. No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder.
- File:Yolanda 2013 in Soft Pastel 15 x 22 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:The Hymn 2000 oil on canvas 24 x 30 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Still Life 2013in Soft Pastel 15 x 22 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Self Portrait 2012 in Soft Pastel 15 x 22 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Scent of Colors 2012 in Oil 24 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Reminisce-scene 2013 in Oil 18 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Race 2012 in Oil 24 x 30 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Point of Convergence 2008 oil on canvas 48 x 45 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Peace Wish, Fish Wish 2005 Mixed-Media 4 x 6 feet by Danilo Santiago.JPG
- File:Panghimagas Pinoy 2013 in Oil 18 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Nostalgia 1995 in Oil 24 x 30 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Mother @ Child 2008 oil on canvas 18 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Lawa 2005 in Oil 24 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Fossils 2013 in Oil 18 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Landscape in a Prism 2004 oil on canvas 4 x 4 feet by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Filipino Resiliency 2014 in Oil 24 x 30 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Erased 2004 Oil on Canvas 24 x24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Child's Fantasy 2009 pastel 24 x 30 by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Bright Landscape 2000 oil on canvas 18 x 24 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
- File:Binding Forces 2009 oil on canvas 15 x 14 inches by Danilo Santiago.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xtechi no sama (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW, photo of a 2D work by a living artist (see also other DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Xtechi no sama)
Rybec (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scall Karll Benn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:0276QvhhhcZB.jpg
- File:CYx5ZuS7LbOn bnthnhhhyKhhhhhhPfU3Bw3hfwdYjb 6nVBZB-08Z8Dv8=.jpg
- File:Zw4fHcUrunMVgjhMUS410brnfDZcepzqMlp7-8BTGSBN2xoE8rS-drqA==.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D.Agasthyeswar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pranav Kumar Sah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too excessive collection for user page.
- File:Abhinav Kumar Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura.jpg
- File:Satyam Kumar Pawan Teliyari Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura 20141.jpg
- File:Pranav Kumar Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura 20111.jpg
- File:Pravin Kumar Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura 20131.jpg
- File:Ashok Kumar Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura 20131.jpg
- File:Mukesh Kumar Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura 20142.JPG
- File:Abhinav Kumar Ashok Ravindra Pravin Mukesh Pranav Abhinav Kumar Sah Banshgopal Puraini Madhepura 20142.jpg
- File:Ravindra Kumar Banshgopal 20131.JPG
- File:Priyanshu Kumar Banshgopal 20141.JPG
- File:Moni Bharti Banshgopal 20141.JPG
- File:Abhinav Kumar Banshgopal 123.JPG
- File:Pranav Kumar Banshgopal 123.jpg
- File:Mona Bharti 2012.jpg
- File:Mona Bharti 2013.jpg
- File:Pranav Kumar Banshgopal 87568.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Revolutionist99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 06.2009 by Revolutionist99 the files are configured with "yes i have published it in newspaper, jang.com.pk" = http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jun2008-weekly/nos-01-06-2008/kol.htm (2008), credited with (section "Glimpses of a glorious past") text (and images?) by "Adeel Pathan" = http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jun2008-weekly/nos-01-06-2008/images/kol3a3.jpg + http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jun2008-weekly/nos-01-06-2008/images/kol3b3.jpg. Permission needed.
Gunnex (talk) 06:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn't OTRS permission normally be needed for something claimed to be "my book" while labeling the author clearly as "Rena Qasimova"? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
My book: Author all illustrations book belongs to me: [8]. You can contact me: Kasumova-rena@rambler.ru --Domencom (talk) 11:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Domencom: I note that the copyright notice on your website is "All rights reserved". Please send an email to Commons' OTRS team at this address: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to verify the link between your name and your account, as well as confirming the release of your book under the terms of the CC-BY-SA license. Note that Commons' CC-BY-SA license allows anyone to use your work for any purpose, even commercially (for a profit) provided they credit you. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
When you email OTRS, please make sure to fill out this information completely:
To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
I hereby affirm that CHOOSE ONE: [I, (name here), am] OR [(copyright holder's name) is] the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of [SPECIFY THE WORK HERE - describe the work to be released in detail, attach the work to the email, or give the URL of the work if online]
I agree to STANDARD CHOICE; SEE BELOW FOR MORE INFORMATION ON TYPE OF LICENSE: [publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).]
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
[SENDER'S NAME AND DETAILS (to allow future verification of authenticity)]
[SENDER'S AUTHORITY (Are you the copyright-holder, director, appointed representative of, etc.)]
[DATE]
--TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Outdated logo, the updated version was uploaded already. Seo411 (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for history of logos. Raymond 14:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep kein Löschgrund gegeben. --Ralf Roleček 14:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as previous users. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 13:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete By principle, I agree with Raymond. History of logos is also important. But I worry about license. It says: "This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright". This is incorrect, the eye is no way simple. OTRS-permission is needed, otherways Commons cannot host the logo. Taivo (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Too complex for PD-simple. This should be uploaded under fair-use at local wikis FASTILY 08:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Outdated Logo - the latest logo has been uploaded already. Seo411 (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep not a valid reason. Keep for history of logos. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 13:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Thorsten: history of logos is important. But I worry about license. This says: "I, the copyright holder ...". I do not believe, that the uploader Ewear is copyright holder of this logo. Also this is not a simple logo, because the eye is complicated. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Too complex for PD-simple. This should be uploaded under fair-use at local wikis FASTILY 08:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kephir as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Windows XP BSOD.png. File type mismatch, so unable to be speedied. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The resolution of this file is 1024×768 pixels, but the other has resolution only 640×480 pixels. But the smaller resolution seems enough. This file is unused, the other is used in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work: author name in {{Information}} contradicts with author name in EXIF. Stefan4 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Overwritten file. The current revision appears to be a copyright violation, see [9]. Stefan4 (talk) 15:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
![[9]](http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://dtmw9u23bb9ya.cloudfront.net/uploads/image/file/5403/institution_full_Main-Building.jpg&imgrefurl=http://university.which.co.uk/ruskin-college-r90&h=460&w=1280&tbnid=HKUbWtlN7hYxpM&tbnh=134&tbnw=375&zoom=1&usg=__gLtWbfiy_3Gw2FkAn0ZoRkUuwCw=){kind=link}
Last clean version restored -FASTILY 08:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Just an unused and superseded duplicate of File:Coat of arms of the Vatican City.svg, uploaded by the same user. --Gambo7 (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Actually, this file is a leftover hold from a dispute. The Vatican sources (which are considered primary) show that both the Vatican and Holy See both use the arms with the gold key on the right, whereas common belief and some secondary sources claim that the two entities emblems are different, with the Vatican using the gold key on the right and the Holy See using it with the gold key on the left. Instead of following the primary source, and because Esoglou and Bellae artes kept edit warring and fighting, both versions were uploaded. This file originally had the gold key on the left but now it has been switched. That dispute was never resolved, but I'm not too interested in bringing it back up because it was very heated and ugly. However, until it is resolved, none of these should be deleted. Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am aware that the Holy See did not "codified" its emblem until the Vatican State was founded, so it is possible to find both emblems with the golden key in bend or bend sinister. But, since at the moment the two files are identical, there is no need to keep them both; anyway, it is not uncommon to use a file for different scopes if it fits (see File:Comtat Venaissin flag.svg as an example, used as flag of both Comtat Venaissin and Papal States; or many other images): so, again, there is no need to keep a duplicate image if another existing one could (perhaps) be used in the future. --Gambo7 (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Normally I would agree, I don't like duplicates either. However considering that dispute, it would probably be better to revert the file so it is no longer a duplicate. Fry1989 eh? 20:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Only if it does not start an edit war or a dispute again... And considering that it's not over yet, maybe it's better if you solve it and then decide whether there is need to have an "alternate" version or not; and maybe it's better if this version has an explicit explanation in order to avoid future discussions.
- In the end, it can be better to delete this file, and upload a brand new one... it costs no (or very few) time or energies. --Gambo7 (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have no interest in reanimating that dispute, but it needs either to be resolved or the file should be reverted back to how it was at the closure. Fry1989 eh? 22:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- In any case I think this file should be deleted and can be replaced by the use (or future readaptation, if needed) of either File:Coat of arms Holy See.svg or File:Coat of arms of the Vatican City.svg --Gambo7 (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have no interest in reanimating that dispute, but it needs either to be resolved or the file should be reverted back to how it was at the closure. Fry1989 eh? 22:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Normally I would agree, I don't like duplicates either. However considering that dispute, it would probably be better to revert the file so it is no longer a duplicate. Fry1989 eh? 20:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am aware that the Holy See did not "codified" its emblem until the Vatican State was founded, so it is possible to find both emblems with the golden key in bend or bend sinister. But, since at the moment the two files are identical, there is no need to keep them both; anyway, it is not uncommon to use a file for different scopes if it fits (see File:Comtat Venaissin flag.svg as an example, used as flag of both Comtat Venaissin and Papal States; or many other images): so, again, there is no need to keep a duplicate image if another existing one could (perhaps) be used in the future. --Gambo7 (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Simpel awnser. In use to illustrate a discussion at en wiki. Natuur12 (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
See COM:DW. Stefan4 (talk) 15:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
User:Stefan4 - I have designed my book and self published it with Xlibris. Oam the owner of the copyright on this work. So remove your remark. Thanks. George Alula
- Which book? This is a photo of a medal, not of of a book. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
User talk:Stefan4: I made my remark, on the Medal, the medal hold my name - MAKITA KANGATO ALULA - what is wrong on using it here?, Thanks" George Alula
- But are you really the engraver who created the medal? Based on the text on the medal, it would appear that it was created by someone working for the National Academy of Metz. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
User talk:Stefan4: I don't believe that Copyright apply on the person who engraved a medal. this rule doesn't apply here. Using someone else name on this medal for other purpose is not lawful. Here such Copyright doesn't apply. Accept my posting. Respond also on the Genocide book case - I didn't see your response. thanks. George Alula.
- The copyright holder is indeed the engraver. If you aren't the engraver, then you can't upload images of the medal. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 08:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The image is by Willie Evans, not the flickr account owner, Carl Lender. But to be fair could the flickr account owner own the rights to this image since he has similar images on his photostream? Could Willie Evans have taken this image on Carl Lender's behalf since on the images next to this image, there are similar other black and white photos. Leoboudv (talk) 06:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright status unclear, permission by photographer needed. Lymantria (talk) 06:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I think it will be reasonable to find out details about photographer and country/date of creation. Image may be in public domain, but we cold not assume this. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
This photo was added by the Flickr upload bot. It is owned by Clender and the photo does have creative commons 2.0 do use and can be used here.
The image is by Willie Evans, not the flickr account owner, Carl Lender. But to be fair could the flickr account owner own the rights to this image since he has similar images on his photostream? Could Willie Evans have taken this image on Carl Lender's behalf since on the images next to this image, there are similar other black and white photos. Ejonestexas (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
photo was added to Flicker by clender with Creative Commons 2.0 for Share and Adapt Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/clender/10044862885/sizes/l/
- If Carl Lender is not the copyright holder, he is not in the position to release the file into whatever license. Stating that somebody who isn't the photographer owns the copyright will need evidence. Without such evidence, the file will have to be deleted. Jcb (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 08:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:Hyderabad High Court Sindh.jpg, by Fast track who's uploads I am currently "cleaning"...) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 09:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Well at the time when i made this montage, there was no such issue related to that 1 image (File:Hyderabad High Court Sindh.jpg. Wikimedia should not allow such files to be uploaded if they are such ill licensed. Anyways, I can replace this image with a new one and will make sure that new replaced image do fit under creative common license. Otherwise, if you think this is not possible, go ahead with the deletion. Nomi887 (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of non-free content. This can be re-uploaded if the non-free image is replaced FASTILY 08:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Shop owner thought the comment was offensive Ulsterman6371 (talk) 21:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Then just remove the offending comment, no need to delete the image Oxyman (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I agree, its the small piece of text that was contained in File History that gave offense "they could measure you up" The shop was both a drapery store and an undertakers - Ulsterman6371
Kept: ? FASTILY 11:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
This comment in History gave offence to the owners "- they could measure you up" - could the file and ammended text be re-loaded from geograph? Ulsterman6371 (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
kept Content has been removed in the current version. No need to give us a lot of work over some vague claim. Natuur12 (talk) 11:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyviol. See here. LMFAO - /let's laugh/ 01:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- A file which is on the Commons for five years and a further four years in the English Wikipedia is very likely used by other websites. I did not verify every instance linked above, but some of them:
- [10] very likely used from Wikipedia since the Webpage links itself to en:Philipse Manor Hall. Very unlikely that a teacher is holder of copyright of all the pics onn the linked webpage created for appearantly a test.
- [11] claims Copyright 2014, our pic was first uploaded to EN:WP in 2005, so it is clear who copied whom.
- [12] claims all pics are in the PD, very likely just another imperfect reuse of WP. Considering context I don't think this page was around, when the file initially was uploaded in 2005.
- [13] Whatever this is, but I think, that is surely not the original copyright holder, under no circumstances.
- [14] IMO also not the source, since the pic there has a smaller resolution. I have no clue wether the site was around long enough, but the specific pages was archived by the Internet Archive wayback machine in 2013 firstly. Very likely not the copyright holder.
- I have no clue where this image was taken by its original EN:WP uploader w:en:User:Dysfunctional, perhaps he could help, but atm I don't see a reason why the file should be deleted. --Matthiasb (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 08:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Obs.: High wiki use!. Uploaded in 03.2006 by Neon (talk · contributions · Statistics) is was previously published via http://members.virtualtourist.com/m/pb/141191/ (click on image tagged with "The clocktower" by Digi") = " Posted in "Center of the city" Apr 19, 2003" = http://members.virtualtourist.com/m/p/m/872ce/ (VirtualTourist®© 1994-2014 VirtualTourist.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.) = http://cdn2.vtourist.com/4/863786-The_clocktower_Faisalabad.jpg
- Update:
- Apparently this file was taken (per description) from this gallery = http://www.world66.com/asia/southasia/pakistan/faisalabad/lib/gallery. world66.com claims that it is {{Cc-by-sa-1.0}}. The related photo site http://www.world66.com/asia/southasia/pakistan/faisalabad/lib/gallery/showimage?pic=asia/southasia/pakistan/faisalabad/photo_1 is empty and in the gallery link above no author is cited. However, CC-by-sa requires attribution of the author, which is not given. The related thumb http://w66-img.ibsrv.net/ph/ot/o_/photo_1_gallerythumb3288 was last modified 2006. Gunnex (talk) 11:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Nominating also (same uploader)
uploaded 03.2006 but previously published via http://web.archive.org/web/20040214231502/http://www.galenfrysinger.com/peshawar_pakistan.htm (archive from 2004) = http://galenf.com/india/pakistan56.jpg, taken by Galen R. Frysinger and licensed with (from FAQ) "Do You allow (...)? Yes, when used by non-profit people or organizations. (...)". Permission needed.
Gunnex (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by INC FASTILY 08:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is the exact same image as File:Corinth, Greece (NASA).jpg, just more highly compressed. This was previously tagged as a duplicate, but an admin declined on the basis that the info templates held different dates, which meant these were different files. This is obviously not the case. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment This file is 1 MB, but the other more than 7 MB. Maybe the other file should be deleted instead? But the other file is used and this is not. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I nominated this one because it has visibly higher levels of compression artefacting. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons is not a place to store such private flag proposals. Use Flickr or similar websites. Antemister (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Unfortunately that's not really what the standing de facto policy has been on Commons. There are many hundreds of "special or fictional" flag images here, and they're not usually deleted just for being "special or fictional" alone, but only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering). I don't really see what harm this image does -- it's not official, but it doesn't claim to be official, and it's based on well-known historical symbols. You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about "original research", but it's been painstakingly explained to you several times already that Commons in fact does not have a "no original research policy". AnonMoos (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per Anonmoos. Fry1989 eh? 17:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes we have several such flags here, but they are clearly out of scope. A flag designed by the uploader without any source is private artwork, which is out of scope. AnonMoos seems to be the only one here who really wants to keep them here.--Antemister (talk) 19:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- As opposed to all the other private artwork we host here? This is an image repository, not Wikipedia. You seem to have a slant. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Antemister -- why did you say that I'm the only one who wanted to keep them right after Fry1989 voted "keep"???? That comes across more as a desperate denial of basic reality than a smooth rhetorical maneuver or effective debating trick. In any case, there are not a "few" special/fictional/unofficially-proposed flags and coats of arms on Commons -- there are in fact hundreds of them here (very possibly thousands), and you've conspicuously failed to show any reason why this file is worse than most of the others (in fact it's not). If you want the standing de facto Commons policy on special/fictional/unofficially-proposed emblems to be changed, then you should really start a discussion on the matter at an appropriate prominent centralized location (such as Village Pump), because sniping at a few semi-randomly chosen individual images with deletion nominations won't really do the job. However, if you do start such a centralized discussion, you would probably be wise not to insist on your own personal interpretation of original research, because that line of argument hasn't led to any useful insight as to what should be kept and not kept on Commons. AnonMoos (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep In scope. Per others. Tm (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- @AnonMoos: Yes there are hundreds of such flags. Any of them is out of scope. I'll start a DR on that whole category at some time, once I've gathered some supporters.--Antemister (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Don't waste your time. You now admit you're on a hunt to get rid of these flags, and as soon as you start that mass DR we'll just quote you here. It's incredibly transparent what you are trying to do and you have been told enough times that Commons does not have such limitations. Get over it and move on. Fry1989 eh? 20:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- @Fry: Yes, I know that I am "on a hunt to get rid of these flags", cleaning COmmons from such strange out of scope images.--Antemister (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- You're not cleaning up anything, you're just trying to get rid of things you don't like. I Don't Like It applies. Stop wasting your time and go do something productive, or perhaps Anonmoos and I will have to take your personal bend to a wider forum of discussion. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- @Fry: Yes, I know that I am "on a hunt to get rid of these flags", cleaning COmmons from such strange out of scope images.--Antemister (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Don't waste your time. You now admit you're on a hunt to get rid of these flags, and as soon as you start that mass DR we'll just quote you here. It's incredibly transparent what you are trying to do and you have been told enough times that Commons does not have such limitations. Get over it and move on. Fry1989 eh? 20:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep per COM:PS, "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page on a Wikimedia Foundation project is allowed." File is displayed on User:R-41, the contributor's user page. Rybec (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I dont know if we make an exception for flags, but this is original art by a currently nonnotable wikimedian, and thus is beyond our scope. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Have you read the discussion above? There are many hundreds of proposed / "special or fictional" flag images on Commons, and traditionally they have not usually been deleted just for being "special or fictional" alone, but only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering)... AnonMoos (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- There are hundreds of such flags - and everyone is one to much. Such fictional flags are out of scope and confusing for users.--Antemister (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I really don't think that that's anywhere near the highest priority for improving Commons now. You seem to spend a lot of effort on agitating various pedantical semi-non-issues which have very little effect or results when it comes to improving Commons. P.S. It's spelled "too"... AnonMoos (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Commons:NPOV has since its first revision given "that flag does not exist" as an example of a dispute that should not be raised on this site. This particular flag is no longer shown on R41's user page, and the files in Category:Special or fictional flags typically aren't especially informative or likely to be reused, in my opinion. Rybec (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment sorry, i missed the above discussion, having not checked the talk page. I disagree that the only mitigating factor should be some inappropriate usage. i tried to get a clearly racist file deleted here, and the ONLY criteria by which it could be deleted was that it was original art by a nonnotable wikipedian (ie someone not known publicly for their artwork), and thus out of scope. no one successfully argued that it could be deleted as hate mongering. Im not going to belabor the point, and I Withdraw my request. The commons has a problem: where do we draw the line with postings of original art? if we are not a free webhosting service, then why is this work here? we also have thousands of images of commercial products whose packaging is under copyright. saying "we have them now" is not a rationale for keeping them. however, this problem will not be solved here, and i guess i dont even want to address it here if there is strong support for keeping such images. PS i thought at first this was a flag proposal from a legitimate source, so i was briefly fooled, and afterwards confused: if an uploader doesnt specifically say in the description of their fictional flag its relation to reality, anyone could assume its a legitimate proposal. I do understand having some personal files uploaded for our user page, though.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, but I'm not sure how legitimately confusing the image description page can be, when User:R41's username is included in the filename, and template {{Fictitious flag}} is displaying a big red box... AnonMoos (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Same as previous DR. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This is none of anyone's business to tell me what I can or cannot upload here. Have I threatened anyone or agitated for violence? No. Have I produced fraud? No. I clearly indicated that it is a fictional flag. Now if this claim has "withdrawed", why is it still open. CLOSE IT. This is really frustrating. I find the rhetoric by Antemister here to be the most condescending and snotty behaviour that I have ever encountered here. The other users, particularly Fry1989 are completely correct, this is not Wikipedia, but Antemister treats it like Wikipedia and is on some crusade to delete original artwork from here. That is censorship, and I hope he fails in his petty crusade.--R-41 (talk) 22:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete self-created artwork, no educational use and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LGA (talk • contribs) 22:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- That's nice; however, that traditionally has not been the only thing considered in this particular area. AnonMoos (talk) 10:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: While I think that we should get rid of all those fictional flags nominating random flags is not the way to do so. Please start a general discussion about this subject and reach some consensus for deletion concidering these personal artworks. Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. This file is no longer used on user pages. 沈澄心✉ 11:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous discussions, in fact I find it kind of odd that this flag, which was previously widely used on user pages, has disappeared from them. This flag is not misleading as it's properly tagged as being a proposal. my issue with the deletion of these false files comes down to two things: 1. (One) Fundamentally, I believe that Wikimedia Commons should be home to all (non-heinous) free media. Free culture isn't just about educational content - it's about making all sorts of intellectual property free to use. It should not be gatekept to a certain type of media. If there were another free media repository out there that was hosting non-educational free media, I would be fine with the Wikimedia Commons closing its doors to somethings. But honestly, we're pretty much all there is, so we have a responsibility to keep free media alive by embracing all of its diversity. 2. (Two) Even without a scope change, I believe that the Wikimedia Commons' "educational purpose" should be interpreted to include cultural and artistic education, not just "the transfer of knowledge". And when I say culture, I mean all culture, not just cultures and subcultures we subjectively label as "worthy". So I oppose these DR's on the basis of my interpretation of this policy—depictions of fantasy and fanart are, broadly speaking, culturally educational. Note how this flags integrates various cultural iconography from Chinese history based on the Five (5) Races Flag.
- Of course, the above would be "a broad view" of educational that this flag is "artistically educational", but it's better than a narrow view of the word as there is no policy specifically against these and the topic remains controversial, with most of these DR's being closed based on the personal beliefs of the closing admin regarding the interpretation of the educational value of such images. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As it is now, such images are generally considered out of scope. Commons does not serve as a repository for any and all free image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
File:I dont care if you talk about me behind my back because good or bad, my name is still in your mouth ;-) 2014-03-15 16-08.jpg
[edit]_2014-03-15_16-08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-03-15_16-08.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This appears to be copied from, or at the very least derivative work of, an image from this website uploaded in 2009; website's terms of use are too restrictive for Commons. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 17:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- There is no website that could claim copyright for this image.
- The photo was taken by an official photographer during a visit of the subject of it in France, many years ago.
- The photographer has agreed that the picture to be published on Wikipedia, thus making it free of any copyright.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Despredemnitate (talk • contribs)
- Do we have any evidence (in the OTRS system, maybe) of this? Also, permission only for Wikipedia (or Wikinews/Wikisource/ etc.) is not enough: the author has to agree to a free license in order for it to be kept on Commons.—Andrei S. Talk 09:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 08:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The magazine covers shown may not be de minimis. Jespinos (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest they are. Andy Mabbett (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Hi-res photo, in which the covers can realistically be cropped out and used. FASTILY 08:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The arms are not correct - the right version is DEU Muelheim am Rhein COA.svg - look to the sources there Juergenk59 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
entweder ist die Künstlerin auf dem Bild, dann hat jemand Fremdes das Bild fotografiert (der Urheber) oder die einstellende Autorin hat das Bild selbst fotografiert, dann ist eine Person auf dem Foto, von der ich keine Freigabe für die kommerzielle Veröffentlichung des Fotos sehe. Jbergner (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also theoretisch (nicht dass ich bei der Qualität daran glaube) könnte es auch ein Selbstauslöser sein.... --Fano (talk) 18:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- bei möglichen Urheberrechtsverletzungen, die bei uns gehostet werden, sollten wir mehr als nur vermutungen erwarten, oder? --Jbergner (talk) 05:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:PEOPLE. This photo shows a subject who is presumably still alive comitting what is likely a crime in their country of residence. It may be appropriate to delete this photo to save this person some hardship later. See this discussion in the village pump. Zellfaze (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This is in-scope image with a valid license. I do not see any grounds for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 19:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Although Zellfaze's argument is valid, that's why the image has been blurred and the unblurred version oversighted. I say keep it. DS (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 08:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality uploader's drawings, not used, out of scope.
- File:Evolution Concept.jpg
- File:Bending of the arm.jpg
- File:Concept 3.jpg
- File:Aluminum Rods.jpg
- File:String Mechanism.jpg
- File:Revised design.jpg
- File:Goal visualization.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The quality is very bad, but the files are used (except revised design) in en.wikiversity on user page. Taivo (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)}}
Deleted: FASTILY 08:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]- File:Atomium pic-.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-001.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-002.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-003.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-004.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-007.JPG
- File:Atomium, Helsey Park, Brussels, Belgium.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. The Atomium is © SABAM 67.87.46.39 15:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Not that it matters, but Atomium seems to be © fr:André Waterkeyn's heirs. SABAM is a legal entity representing copyright holders in certain situations. For example, legal claims may come from SABAM on behalf of the copyright holder. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
These images show a building by w:André Waterkeyn. Belgian law doesn't allow photos of buildings without the permission of the architect unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years.
- File:AtoniumEvening BrusselsB.JPG
- File:AtoniumNightView BrusselsB.JPG
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:AtomiumBrusselsBanner.JPG
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all images. The Atomium is clearly the subject of these photos. 67.87.46.39 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom russavia (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No freedom of panorama in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
Derivative works of texts around and/or inside Atomium.
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (19).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (20).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (25).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep Nothing copyrightable shown in the image: all of them fall under {{PD-ineligible}} and/or {{PD-text}}. No FOP-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's no chance that something as long as this is {{PD-ineligible}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Stefan, I'm at least as respectful of literary copyright as you are, but I'm not sure about these. Although presented in sentence form, they amount to lists of names (in the first and third cases) and lists of dimensions (in the second case). I think these would fail copyright in the USA -- I don't really have any idea about the TOO for literary works in Belgium, but I think we can keep them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, PD-text or PD-ineligible --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]See COM:FOP#Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]No FOP in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Aside from the Atomium, which is obvious, I also doubt that the copyright to all of the other images in this poster belong to the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]Non-free architecture.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Belgium --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
it's a duplicate PhoenixBerlin (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Duplicate of which file? Taivo (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope FASTILY 08:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Seriously the IOC puts everything PD? has this been checked? 83.163.5.82 23:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably not own work, old promo picture, small size. Yann (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The photo is my propiety. I have a foundator of ZAR (folk-rock group), and the rights of the photo are mine. This photo is aloaded in other sites with my authorization. Thanks. Luis Venosa
- I think you should send a permission (see COM:OTRS for the procedure), and if possible, a higher resolution image. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 08:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ajitkrverma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too excessive collection for user page.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Meanwhile, (s)he has uploaded File:Acr1.jpg and File:Acr2.jpg. Both are used, but only in en.wiki on user pages. Taivo (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajitkrverma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal pictures
- File:Ajitkv6.jpg
- File:Ajitkv5.jpg
- File:Ajitkv4.jpg
- File:Ajitkv3.jpg
- File:Ajitkv.jpg
- File:Ajitkv2.jpg
- File:Ajitkv1.jpg
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
See COM:FOP#Belgium.
- File:Sculptuur Ad Wouters Sint-Donatuspark Leuven board referring to 't Pad van Ad.jpg
- File:Waarom ben ik een conifeer?.jpg
- File:Van de hak op de tak.jpg
- File:De sitkaspar, een levend voorbeeld.jpg
- File:Stroopbomen.jpg
- File:Een boom vol leven.jpg
- File:Bladeren kleuren het bos.jpg
- File:Mythische bomen.jpg
- File:Dikke ouderling.jpg
- File:Verborgen geuren.jpg
- File:Geheime groeikalender.jpg
- File:Levende doden.jpg
- File:Levende fossielen.jpg
- File:Woudreuzen.jpg
- File:Boksbomen.jpg
- File:Verranderlijk uiterlijk.jpg
- File:Inheems of uitheems?.jpg
- File:Toen de ijstijden kwamen.jpg
- File:Geef het kind een naam.jpg
- File:De Dirigent.jpg
- File:Ignatius 2.jpg
- File:Ignatius 1.jpg
- File:Neanderthaler door Ad Wouters 1.jpg
- File:Neanderthaler door Ad Wouters 2.jpg
- File:Neanderthaler door Ad Wouters 3.jpg
- File:De Bosprotter.jpg
- File:Elfenhuis.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
What is this? On the one hand there is an app for Android inviting people to upload their pictures. On the other hand there are jerks who nominate those pictures for deletion. Good thing I didn't waste my precious time uploading the many saplings of the arboretum I want to start an article about in nlwiki.
Oh well, mapping on Openstreetmap is just a tad easier. If it exists, one can simply add it to the map. I was trying to add wikidata tags for the objects I'm adding, and where applicable wikipedia entries. But I'm about to give up. If a WP article happens to exist, I'll point to it, but adding content doesn't seem to be my forte.
Dejectedly, Polyglot (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- The Belgian copyright law prohibits you from taking and distributing photos of copyrighted works without permission from the author. See for example COM:FOP#Belgium for a general explanation and this page for the copyright holder's opinion about a specific work. For this reason, certain categories about Belgian things contain warnings not to upload any photos. See for example Category:European Parliament, Brussels or Category:Buildings in Belgium. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Well I do have permission from Ad Wouters to upload the pictures of the statues. I'll ask the forestry services if it's OK to upload pictures of their information panels. How do I make known that I have obtained the permission to take these pictures and publish them on Commons? I spoke to Ad Wouters, he doesn't mind the pictures are on Wikipedia, but he doesn't want them to be used commercially. Unfortunately, I didn't see the option to put my uploads under CC-BY-SA-NC though.
- Also, where do I go to vote for this silly law to be abolished in our Belgian banana republic? --Polyglot (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't accept images which can't be used commercially, see {{Cc-by-nc-sa}} and Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Licensing/Justifications.
- Permission should be documented by using the process described at COM:OTRS.
- I don't know how to change laws. Some members of the French parliament tried to change the French law some time ago, but failed, so photographs of buildings, statues, information boards and furniture are still prohibited in France. On the other hand, other people managed to make improvements in Russia, so it will be legal to use photographs of buildings commercially in Russia starting on 1 October. See also this, although it is already past the deadline. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also, where do I go to vote for this silly law to be abolished in our Belgian banana republic? --Polyglot (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- OK, I was under the false assumption that going out and taking pictures of the statues myself, would make the pictures suitable for upload. Maybe I'll ask the sculptor for explicit permission on Saturday when another statue will be revealed. But probably I won't. He was very clear about not wanting to release the rights if they can be exploited commercially. Besides he abhorrs technology, so he would probably not be willing to send emails granting permission.
- So, I'll simply give up. Also the article I started to write about him on nl.wikipedia got nominated for deletion. Not encyclopedic enough... I think it's worthwhile and actually artistic what he's doing. That's why I started out to go and take pictures of his works in the first place. The only positive thing that came from it, is that I met him in person now. (His carvings had gotten my attention before already).
- What strikes me as perverse about this silly law is that apparently it's even prohibited to TAKE these pictures. This is new to me. The problem with it is that it makes my mapping activities for Openstreetmap a whole lot more complicated, as I was using those pictures as memory aids. I hope it's still OK to indicate the existence of these statues/works of art/building on OSM. But it seems like I'd have to do it there and then. Or maybe I should stop and take notes, instead of snapping a quick picture and moving on. Those pictures are the notes of my mapping.
- The other reason for taking pictures (and uploading them) was to record a point in time for those objects. What it looked like at that moment. Now it seems as if some enlightened people consider I took something with me, which belonged to somebody else. They're just 1s and 0s people. Not the objects themselves or even part of them.
- --Polyglot (talk) 06:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Article 22.3 allows you to take these photos, but only as long as you do not show them to anyone outside your family. On the other hand, it doesn't seem to be permitted to upload them to the Internet, but you should still be able to use the photos as private notes. Geographical coordinates aren't copyrightable, so just indicating the longitude and latitude isn't a copyright violation. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Stefan4: Thanks for the clarification. I was already getting worried about my freedoms in the 'Free world', which didn't feel like that at all for a while there. I'll explain the whole issue to Ad Wouters and see how he feels about doing the necessary legwork to allow me to upload pictures of his work. I did get confirmation that he doesn't mind that I put the route he described on Openstreetmap. (My latest upload is a rendering of this route).
- Is it a coincidence/oversight that you didn't nominate the picture I left on nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad Wouters (I removed the links to the offending ones on that page? Or should that one be removed as well? File:Sculptuur_Ad_Wouters_Sint-Donatuspark_Leuven_02.jpg --Polyglot (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Article 22.3 allows you to take these photos, but only as long as you do not show them to anyone outside your family. On the other hand, it doesn't seem to be permitted to upload them to the Internet, but you should still be able to use the photos as private notes. Geographical coordinates aren't copyrightable, so just indicating the longitude and latitude isn't a copyright violation. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, and have legal authorization from the copyright holder to publish these files under a free, Commons-compatible license, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 08:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
No FOP in Belgium.
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 07.jpg
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 06.jpg
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 04.jpg
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 05.jpg
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 02.jpg
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 01.jpg
- File:Jong van Geest Ad Wouters Ruelenspark 03.jpg
- File:Kabouter en paddenstoel door K in Provinciaal Domein Kessel-Lo.jpg - OTRS received #2014053110004081. Ciell (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Screen displaying real time information about De Lijn 601 and 318 at Naamsepoort Leuven.jpg
- File:Vleermuis Ad Wouters 04.jpg
- File:Vleermuis Ad Wouters 05.jpg
- File:Nico Ad Wouters 03.jpg
- File:Nico Ad Wouters 02.jpg
- File:Vleermuis Ad Wouters 01.jpg
- File:Nico Ad Wouters 01.jpg
- File:Fiere Margriet Willy Meysmans 04.jpg
- File:Fiere Margriet Willy Meysmans 01.jpg
- File:Fiere Margriet Willy Meysmans 03.jpg
- File:Fiere Margriet Willy Meysmans 02.jpg
- File:Don Bosco Ad Wouters.jpg
- File:Fiere Margriet Dijleterassen Willy Meysmans.jpg
- File:Stof en geest 02 Willy Meysmans.jpg
- File:Stof en geest 01 Willy Meysmans.jpg
- File:Inktzwammen Ad Wouters 02.jpg
- File:Balou Ad Wouters 01.jpg
- File:Fluiterke van 't klein geluk en Specht.jpg
- File:De dirigent Ad Wouters.jpg
- File:De Pootefretter Haasrode Ad Wouters.jpg
- File:Het Uileke Ad Wouters.jpg
- File:Neanderthaler Ad Wouters.jpg
- File:Monument stadsbegraafplaats Leuven 07.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Albert Giraud in Sint-Donatuspark Leuven.jpg
- File:Sculptuur Ad Wouters Sint-Donatuspark Leuven 01.jpg
JurgenNL (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm, I thought taking them from farther away would solve the problem, apparently not. Oh well, off with their heads! I fail to see what is artistic about the computer screen, though. But it's not important. I'm going to find another hobby. --Polyglot (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted most of them per nomination. --Krd 09:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Please also judge these:
- File:Pad_van_Ad_Composition_for_Wikivoyage_Banner.png
- File:Sint-Michielskerk Leuven Ingang gedenkplaat oorlog en Sint-Michiel door Ad Wouters.jpg
I wouldn't want to draw the wrong conclusion (again) about their FOP status--Polyglot (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]Derivative works of the copyrighted Darth Vader character shown.
- File:Adidas Darth Vader Superstar side.JPG
- File:Atlanta - generic 26.JPG
- File:Atlanta - generic 27.JPG
- File:Balloons 2.jpg (The Vader balloon is not that visible; the artistic aspects of the barn-shaped balloon may be more of a problem.)
- File:Cameron Balloons Darth Vader-105 SS MRD-1.jpg (it appears that the photo is covered by an OTRS ticket, but it is not clear that the ticket covers the Darth Vader character)
- File:Darth Vader Graffito NYC, December 2013.JPG
- File:Darth vader grotesque.jpg
- File:DarthVader-Inside.jpg
- File:Jamming Troopers on TT-303 Bass Bot.jpg
- File:Luke and his dad - geograph.org.uk - 1379674.jpg (see COM:Cosplay)
- File:Muyayo001.jpg (the tattoos likely include an implied license with regard to public display, but it is not clear that this extends to photographic reproductions)
- File:Secombe Filoni Rose Sansweet.JPG
- File:Vader-statue-of-liberty.jpg
- File:WonderCon 2012 (6856132444).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gazebo (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Aside from annoying m:copyright paranoia mentality shown here, this nom bundles images that may fall under Commons:Freedom of panorama, Commons:Fan art, Commons:De minimis (File:Balloons 2.jpg), COM:GRAFFITI, and others. Please relist as individual noms, and we will discuss it there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Procedural close. These should be nominated for deletion individually -FASTILY 08:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]Derivative works of the Darth Vader character mask.
In the case of File:Muyayo001.jpg, though tattoos may come with an implied license that allows public display, it is not clear that photographic reproductions are permitted.
Gazebo (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]Per COM:TOYS and COM:DW. COM:FOP does not seem to apply to any of the cases
- File:Anime Expo 2011 - Darth Vader and Pikachu (5893317644).jpg
- File:Darth Vader (10585267443) B.jpg
- File:Darth Vader (10585267443).jpg
- File:Darth Vader und imperiale Sturmtruppen (10585314963).jpg
- File:Darth Vader wearing traditional ukrainian clothes (cropped).jpg
- File:Darth Vader wearing traditional ukrainian clothes.jpg
- File:Traje Darth Vader.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_B.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's a little unfortunate that you didn't seem to look at Commons:Image_casebook#Costumes_and_cosplay. That would seem to save File:Darth Vader wearing traditional ukrainian clothes.jpg at least... AnonMoos (talk) 09:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, I looked at it. I understand your comment, but the point here is that, although the overall "costume" in the Ukrainian case can be regarded as a "modified or original representation of a character" the issue here is in the Darth Vader mask. It's copyrighted, it's covered by COM:TOYS and cannot be regarded as a de minimis element within the picture. On the contrary. The picture is of course a modified representation, but keeps unmodified prominent elements of the original copyrighted element. I do acknowledge it's a border case, but not unfounded at all. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- If it's being actively worn by a person in a manner like an article of clothing, then: 1) It's a little dubious whether it can be called a "toy" in the most useful meaning of the word. 2) Its "utilitarian" function is specifically not copyrightable under United States law. The image may end up needing to be deleted in the end, but I wish you would stop throwing the word "toy" around, because I don't think that it clarifies any issues in this case. AnonMoos (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Good point, but don't blame on me but on COM:TOYS. It explicitly mentions the Darth Vader example. If the Darth Vader mask is a "utilitarian" object, then it should be discussed there and not here, I guess. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 08:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. According to [15], Stormtrooper helmets are copyrighted artworks in the United States (but ineligible for copyright as utilitarian objects in the United Kingdom). As the helmets are unfree in the United States, we can't host any pictures of them. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
___________________
Deleted - Darth Vader masks are copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Vader
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters or copyrighted works.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Spain. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep this one, it's a fan creation of Darth Vader. This is not a photo of a product manufacturer. --Clodion (talk) 10:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep
Freedom of panorama in Canada. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Hungary. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:Star Wars and the Power of Costume July 2018 56 (Darth Vader's costume and cape from Episode III).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Chrome Darth Vader Helmet 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Chrome Darth Vader Helmet 2.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Darth Vader Helmet 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration Orlando EFX Darth Vader Helmet 2.jpg
- File:Star Wars Weekends 2011 (5749714998).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:SWCA - Darth Vader helmet off statue (16580453314).jpg
- File:SWCA - Slideshow Darth Vader statue (17015354510).jpg
- File:VADER 1 (3343456101).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Spain. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Freedom of panorama in Spain. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep this one.This is a photo taken during a promotional show with Bob Iger and George Lucas. This event was free. The photo must be too. --Clodion (talk) 10:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
_(33102448243).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep According to Mike Godwin's mails. --Cody escadron delta (d) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, I think it's time that the category be salted, and that we develop a means of preventing uploads of well-known copyrighted characters/works. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:33, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- The diagram on Derivative works explains that a picture taken in country where the freedom of panaorama is allowed can be uploaded under a free licence. Yuraily Lic should check each picture before proposing a whole category to the deletion. --Cody escadron delta (d) 13:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Cody escadron delta, the creators of the characters have copyrights. It doesn't matter where photos were taken. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sure it matters, please read Commons:Freedom of panorama. --Cody escadron delta (d) 16:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- According to Christian Ferrer (an administrator), "FoP could apply if it was the first publication/creation, however the person who made the graffiti made a DW of a copyrighted character, the owner of the former character still have rights on it" from Com:Deletion_requests/File:Mazinger_Z_Sabadell.jpg. Therefore, these are files to deletion as COM:DW of copyrighted characters. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yes because the graffiti is a DW, but for example, the picture File:Gateway to space 2016, Budapest, Darth Vader.jpg was taken during a Star Wars exhibition. So the Darth Vader costume here is not a DW, it is an original copyrighted costume and mask, so it is a 3D artwork, like a statue. So the FoP must be applied here. --Cody escadron delta (d) 12:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- According to Christian Ferrer (an administrator), "FoP could apply if it was the first publication/creation, however the person who made the graffiti made a DW of a copyrighted character, the owner of the former character still have rights on it" from Com:Deletion_requests/File:Mazinger_Z_Sabadell.jpg. Therefore, these are files to deletion as COM:DW of copyrighted characters. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sure it matters, please read Commons:Freedom of panorama. --Cody escadron delta (d) 16:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Cody escadron delta, the creators of the characters have copyrights. It doesn't matter where photos were taken. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- These are not on permanent public display. FOP is not applied to them. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the copy/paste answer, it's always a pleasure to speak with a robot! Anyway "mass deletion request" are meaningless, most of these pictures, 24 exactly are in the same case than the spiderman costume : Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan/Mike Godwin mail. The answer of the lawyer Mike Godwin is clear : "Suppose someone dresses up as, say, Spider-Man, and has a photo taken. The photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation.", if we change spider-man by darth vader, we got the same case. Please make individual request and be sure you are not in a FoP or Spider-man case.
- According to [16], Ellin Beltz (an administrator) concluded "Darth Vader masks are copyright". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Spider-man mask is copyrighted too and according to the wikimedia fondation's lawyer "the photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation". It seems the pictures deleted by Ellin Beltz showed toys and not a person "dresses up as" Darth Vader. Do not forget that an administrator can be wrong, they are not all-knowing. --Cody escadron delta (d) 05:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- According to [16], Ellin Beltz (an administrator) concluded "Darth Vader masks are copyright". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the copy/paste answer, it's always a pleasure to speak with a robot! Anyway "mass deletion request" are meaningless, most of these pictures, 24 exactly are in the same case than the spiderman costume : Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan/Mike Godwin mail. The answer of the lawyer Mike Godwin is clear : "Suppose someone dresses up as, say, Spider-Man, and has a photo taken. The photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation.", if we change spider-man by darth vader, we got the same case. Please make individual request and be sure you are not in a FoP or Spider-man case.
- Here another mail by Mike Godwin about costume :
- “I do not see a legal justification for removing the images we are discussing here. It is common for photographers to take pictures of people in costumes of copyrighted and/or trademarked characters. In general, such photographs are understood as lawful.
- I believe the deletion of the photographs you were talking about was unnecessary, and that this represents a too-conservative worldview with regard to the applicability of copyright and other intellectual property theory.
- Feel free to reproduce this e-mail on-wiki.”
- The mail can be found here : Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan#Comment by Mike Godwin.
- So every pictures that are showing a costume, or somebody wearing a costume, should not be deleted because it is not a copyright violation. It is a different case for pictures that are showing statues or toys.
- --Cody escadron delta (d) 20:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay. Mike Godwin's email is clearly marked as obsolete everywhere it's quoted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
