Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 13th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was deleted in this DR, but reuploaded and redirected. Fry1989 eh? 00:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 00:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure what value this has -- it is in Category:Whales, but there is nothing here but an out of focus SCUBA diver. I also note that the Flickr license has been changed to NC. While that doesn't affect us because the bot certified that the license was CC-BY when uploaded, I see little reason to keep a marginal image against the wishes of its copyright holder..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as uploader, i agree matanya talk 10:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sanajaved(actress)). MER-C 02:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Fastily Revicomplaint? 08:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt about authorship of uploader, as the same image was uploaded already in 2011 to here. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Magog the Ogre Revicomplaint? 08:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover; requires permission from rights holder; also [1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Magog the Ogre Revicomplaint? 08:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope LMLM (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Fastily Revicomplaint? 08:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, given his other copyvios. Psychonaut (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 00:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work, given his other obvious copyvios. Psychonaut (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 00:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name 幽灵巴尼 (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No file Lymantria (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt that this is own work, per this result. Surely it has NOT been created on March 13th. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this photo because the latest version of this photo was uploaded. This photo is too old and I have uploaded the new one. Thank you so much! Ladybesttruthful (talk) 16:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have upload the HIGHEST Quality of our school band photo. So I request that please delete the low quality of our school band photo. Thank you! Ladybesttruthful (talk) 14:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Taivo. Yann (talk) 06:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded without photographers (my) approval 83.108.99.226 11:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have asked OTRS to do so here. Storkk (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Presumably no such license was given. I also searched the name of the indicated author in the OTRS system, and got no corresponding ticket. whym (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is another ticket about deletion of this image, Ticket#2014031310010718, and while processing that I noticed I could not find the original ticket. Is there any way for this ticket to be forwarded to some queue that maks it lost for most OTRS members? (Like me?) Jeblad (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeblad: Good point, I asked in the OTRS-permissions mailing list if it can be such a "stray" ticket. whym (talk) 11:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While it's not possible to rule out some technical snafu, the ticket showed up as "no ticket" for me as well, and I have access to all queues. Given that the only edit of the uploader on any project ever (under that name) was to upload this image with a tag he placed himself, I think this claim is pretty dodgy. Since no OTRS agent has ever verified this, I would consider this a very valid "no permission" deletion myself, even if not for the complaint! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Invalid OTRS ticket. -> Copyright violation Raymond 12:26, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable company fails scope Flickrworker (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and pixelated, have svg and high-quality png in Category:Thioacetamide DMacks (talk) 04:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, delete if there is good svg replacement. No need to waste time to discuss it :-) Polimerek (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 23:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality images. There are much better versions of these paintings in Category:Paintings by Henri Rousseau in the Hermitage.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a (bad) joke. These are high resolution images made by a museum in TIFF format, i.e. without compression artifacts, so certainly the best you can get. Or do you mean to delete other images? Your request is not clear. Yann (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann Alan (talk) 03:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the copyright holder. No free license on the website Tekstman (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person, likely uploaded to damage her (see description). Tekstman (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Believed to be not own work, see exif info and watermark Tekstman (talk) 11:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnotable company logo Flickrworker (talk) 21:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by the oner Fmaxwiki (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable company. Fails SCOPE Flickrworker (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Broimp.jpg Jonund (talk) 08:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: smaller version of picture already on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Aga (d) 07:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Fmaxwiki (talk) 18:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had uploaded the image years ago as a way to learn how uploading worked on the Commons. Since it's a picture of my brother and not me, and serves no purpose on this site, I would like to request for its deletion. Jimwhat (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the en.wp source ([3]) the website and presumed image copyright owner does not "allow my pictures to be used by any commercial enterprise." This does not seem like a freely licensed image to me. -- TLSuda (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

but wikipedia is not commercial enterprise.--EEIM (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But every file that is hosted at Commons should be free for use for any reason including commercial. That's the whole point of Commons. -- TLSuda (talk) 18:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 17:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

autograph of the uploader, unused 91.65.158.212 09:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is used by Škoda Transportation in presentations. I think photo is not own work of this author who upload this photo. Delasoto (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of non notable person Tekstman (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable company, who could not establish notability on Wikipedia, advertising Flickrworker (talk) 15:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 23:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of and SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 17:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe el archivo en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Senado_de_Chile_(2010).svg GPOChile (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion, could be perfectly used. Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a picture about a young school girl, which no interesse for an encyclopedia Sandro (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Private image of non notable person Tekstman (talk) 11:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Non notable person Flickrworker (talk) 14:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep "Non notable person" is not true, see http://www.barbyganesh.com/#!biography/c13dn 91.66.63.42 10:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong! She doesn't have a wiki page and neither do any of her productions so by that logic she is not notable. Also her picture alone is not encyclopedic in any way. Flickrworker (talk) 11:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non notable film company. Commons is not a social space to upload your non notable company's logo Flickrworker (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE and likely a copyviolating derivative of this background image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not facebook. Flickrworker (talk) 11:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; also derivative of the background image (unknown source). -- Túrelio (talk) 09:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown person. Unused. Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work 91.65.158.212 10:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
+File:DJ Pasha.jpg

I said in the past at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:ESC 2005 photos from Jerry Daykin on Flickr that this flickr user attendet the ESC 2005 at home on his TV, he not created this photos himself. Martin H. (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for uploading these files. I didn't know about your earlier decision.Qcumber (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is subject of image so this is not "own work" as claimed. We will need a license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable company, which has twice been deleted on Wikipedia Flickrworker (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person. Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 14:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Aga (d) 07:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file was uploaded from my Flickr account with an appropriate licence and full data on its genesis. I have over a dozen images uploaded from another Flickr account on this site. This photo was nominated for deletion less than an hour after upload with only the cryptic message that it is out of scope. This photo has more detail than many on this site and joins at least 1,442 other images of nude males and at least double that number of nude female images. Please be more specific as to why this image is different from all the others and is therefore, out of scope.


Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry photo of an unidentified person, not useful for educational purposes. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet type meme poster, out of scope imo Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

newer version at File:Grant 1962 27b.png CFCF (talk) 07:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable company. Fails SCOPE Flickrworker (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not Facebook or alike. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image and unused. There is a better alternative: File:Copa de Liga de España2.svg Angelus(talk) 14:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No consensus for deletion. Scope based. Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see the source, it isn't working, is it a free graphic? Ezarateesteban 13:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Uploader response to Ezarate: The source changed since the MIT upgraded their website. This is the new source: http://atlas.media.mit.edu/explore/tree_map/hs/export/arg/all/show/2011/ and it has been updated to 2011, if you want to update it, you're free to do it.

It isn't the same graphic Ezarateesteban 15:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE and likely a copyviolating derivative of this background image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE for being merely promotional; see also http://webdizajn-ili.net/nasi-radovi/internet-stranica-za-marketing-agenciju/. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a copyright violation 91.65.158.212 11:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

highly doubtful copyright claim as "own work" Hvd69 (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Here is a version much closer to the original --Hvd69 (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DW from online source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe el archivo en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camara_de_Diputados_Chile_2010.png GPOChile (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep SVG version is much better than a raster PNG version. See Commons:Transition to SVG. In fact, if there should be a request for deletion should be of the superseded PNG (although these kind of requests are currently suspended). The file, besides is much older than the PNG version (it was the first Chilean apportionament diagram) and has widespread usage. --B1mbo (talk) 02:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the uploader. This file is no longer needed and I request deletion. Thank you. The Haz talk 15:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe el archivo en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camara_de_Diputados_Chile_2014.png GPOChile (talk) 16:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep SVG version is much better than a raster PNG version. See Commons:Transition to SVG. In fact, if there should be a request for deletion should be of the superseded PNG (although these kind of requests are currently suspended). --B1mbo (talk) 02:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undated photo which according to the source shows a factory that was completed in 1961, which indicates that it's not old enough for {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. January (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.65.158.212 12:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.65.158.212 12:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not facebook Flickrworker (talk) 14:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person without a wiki page. Maybe stolen from social media Flickrworker (talk) 14:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple logo, it's probably copyrighted UAwiki (talk) 09:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong SVG: not a vector image. Moreover, it is a poor quality image and unused. There are better alternatives in category:cup trophies in art Angelus(talk) 13:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be 'own work', please see imho 'moiree' (screenshot?), Roland zh (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not facebook Flickrworker (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File needs an OTRS ticket 91.65.158.212 12:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently in use here . But it does not show up on the commons page. Secondly seems to be a non notable person. Update seems to be two visually similar images on commons. This one to be clear is unused. Flickrworker (talk) 14:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not likely to be his own work Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE and low tchnical quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.65.158.212 12:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is here (direct). That site has CC license at the bottom, but it is a license laundering site, as explained here (see for example watermarks and inline credits there that demonstrate material is sourced to various websites and sources external to that site). Uploader is one of several socks of Vszhuba used to restore copyvios of same subject matter (see Vszhuba talk/deleted contribs). If this is indeed the work of the "International Kurtosh Kalach Trade Corporation", an OTRS ticket from that organization would be required. Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Sir or Madame,

My name is dr. Peter HANTZ, I'm the manager of the International Kurtosh Kalach Trade Corporation. Most of the pictures on www.kurtos.eu site were made by me, and the designers who finalized them were also paid by me. Some pictures are foreigners, but in all cases we mentioned their sources.

I'm tired of all these stupid and anonym attacks and harrassing. It would be better if you would stop this, and thank us for our efforts, time and money for preparing all these nice pictures.

You can delete the picture, but I will put another employee of mine to upload it, if necessary every week.

best, Peter


Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not facebook. Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrayed person's wikipedia page on NL was deleted because of Non E. Tekstman (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license on website, no OTRS, non notable person Tekstman (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" = 1 kb 91.65.158.212 11:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.65.158.212 12:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does the given {{PD-textlogo}} applies here? In my eyes this crest is too complex for it. JuTa 20:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-textlogo}} is possibly not applicable. I'd just noticed it being used on other GAA logos like File:WolfeTonesGAA.jpg. Is there a better alternative? Sorry - I'm new to this. The reason I've uploaded the logos it because they exist for comparible organisations like this and this Seaninryan (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality. Out of scope as it is a non notable comedian Flickrworker (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 91.65.158.212 12:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unsed personal file, out of com:SCOPE Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE and low technical quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Non notable person. Flickrworker (talk) 11:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Utter Nonsense/attack Stemoc (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, taken from a magazine Tekstman (talk) 12:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe el archivo en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Senado_Chile_2014.png GPOChile (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep SVG version is much better than a raster PNG version. See Commons:Transition to SVG. In fact, if there should be a request for deletion should be of the superseded PNG (although these kind of requests are currently suspended). --B1mbo (talk) 02:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused picture of an unknown person Flickrworker (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work and seems to be advertising Flickrworker (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; also already found all over the web. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot copyvio (c)2002 Konami Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, low technical quality; already present at a number of sexforum websites. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unknown person Flickrworker (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality image, no identification of location, unused Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image uploaded from Flickr, repalced with a higher quality version...Please also delete the Low Quality crop from that image as well (File:Jet Li cropped.JPG) Stemoc (talk) 10:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Derivative is in use. Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non notable person Flickrworker (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; low technical quality and already on several websites.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Aga (d) 07:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person Flickrworker (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible screenshot Flickrworker (talk) 21:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Bildqualität Aarp65 (talk) 12:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. self-"porn"-shot; already present at a number of gay-porn websites. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPEG duplicate of an SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 17:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Rack railway.jpg Not a speedy deletion, as original authorship is unclear. It appears that this is the later derivative though, even if the first uploaded to Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How is this useful or in scope? Flickrworker (talk) 11:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person Tekstman (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE and likely a copyviolating derivative of a background image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person Tekstman (talk) 12:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as vanity image; Likely also a copyviolating derivative of this background image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image and unused. There are better alternatives in category:cup trophies in art Angelus(talk) 13:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission - likely a fan upload seeing as the author is "Tom Fan" Lady Lotus (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fgd qeee wer unsal vural 19:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader nominated it and seems out of scope te me possibel copyrightviolation as well Natuur12 (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear purpose, this map is in SVG under another file name and is updated concurrent with events. Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this map is in PNG and it's going to replace the SVG map because the SVG map isn't being updated even after I brought it up to the talk. --Prcc27 (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the SVG map is supposed to be updated concurrent. If it is not you need to make a complaint on the talk page, but replacing it with a PNG is inappropriate. Fry1989 eh? 22:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read what I said? I said I DID take it to the talk, and nothing happened! --Prcc27 (talk) 22:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I did, some times it can be slow and some times you have to get people to agree first, but just replacing a map like this isn't the right way. Fry1989 eh? 23:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's only temporary, until the other map is updated. --Prcc27 (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete We should update maps, not upload a new map for every update. Prcc27, if people don't agree with your changes, then perhaps the problem is with your changes. I'm reverting all transclusions of this map. Kwamikagami (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The problem is people don't every go to the talk. People don't disagree with me because they never go to the talk! --Prcc27 (talk)

Deleted: Redundant. Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo wird unter dem Benutzer-Account "Süddekor" hochgeladen. Marketing-süddekor (talk) 11:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope anyway Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{FoP-Switzerland}} is not a license and seems to be missued when applied to a poster downloded from the net. Jarekt (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is in scope because... Flickrworker (talk) 22:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission Lady Lotus (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster. No wiki page. Flickrworker (talk) 14:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE and likely a copyviolating derivative of this background image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purely promotional material. Not educational, out of scope. -- P 1 9 9   19:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry file, rainbow flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 00:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image and unused. There are better alternatives in category:cup trophies in art Angelus(talk) 13:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does the given {{PD-textlogo}} applies here? In my eyes this crest is too complex for it. JuTa 20:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-textlogo}} is possibly not applicable. I'd just noticed it being used on other GAA logos like File:WolfeTonesGAA.jpg. Is there a better alternative? Sorry - I'm new to this. The reason I've uploaded the logos it because they exist for comparible organisations like this and this Seaninryan (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person Tekstman (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, promo Tekstman (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person Tekstman (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unencyclopedic vanity image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need for old redirect Aeroid (talk) 08:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free lincensing of this image. Its source is just a broken link to a website that doesn't seem to contain any freely licensed material. Damiens.rf 18:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not facebook Flickrworker (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No contiene información Zacsaldivia (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need for old redirect Aeroid (talk) 08:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person Tekstman (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tellyblackwood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamirKuzmarFotos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, at least one copyvio http://www.gruposamir.com/puntosVenta.html

Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zmx knacks.rs 124.184.174.187 01:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Non-valid nomination reason. Image has metadata and is categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement 220.220.28.84 15:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahriaf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SCOPE.

Jespinos (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noravea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these appear to be maps, coats of arms, or logos for an alternate history which the uploader doesn't allude to. And the ones that aren't fake are copyright violations. Wildly out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theemblema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non notable company. Out of scope.

Flickrworker (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Durgarao Vuddanti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ellalark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio http://www.projectscotland.co.uk/ see http://www.projectscotland.co.uk/terms/ The content of the Site (including, but not limited to all text and artwork) is protected by copyright. The copyright is owned by Project Scotland or is otherwise licensed from a third party for use by ProjectScotland.

You may view or download any part of the Site for private purposes, but you are not permitted, without our permission, to:

   store the Site, or any part of the Site, for any other purpose;
   print copies of the Site, or any part of the Site, for any other purpose;
   reproduce, copy or transmit the Site, or any part of the Site, in any way, for any other purpose or in any other medium.

All other rights which are not specifically granted are reserved.

Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matheusb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Matheusb + different watermarks of photographers (2x "Diego Silva" + 1x "Felipe Navas").

Gunnex (talk) 07:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising Flickrworker (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Austin7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious advertisement.

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rcarruco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement 220.220.28.84 15:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suleman Pathan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused file, private image, self-created artwork, self-promotion. Moreover, some montage could be derivative works of copyrighted material.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis Angel Rosario (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md.Azad Hosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md.Azad Hosen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too excessive collection for user page.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 17:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not facebook. Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 11:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zavyalovaanna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of fan/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ربنا (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not currently used anywhere, very unclear (at least to me) how they are within Common's scope.

JesseW (talk) 05:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Vergelbradford

[edit]

These files are all the heavily-photoshopped personal artwork of User:Vergelbradford, which frankly all fail COM:EDUSE and COM:NOT. I've group-nominated these because many are duplicates, incorporate the same elements, and are otherwise simply not "Commons material" in the exact same way. Furthermore, in light of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stan Brakhage's Office In Sibell-Wolle, University of Colorado.jpg, which was an image claimed to be of a deceased filmmaker's office, and had an image of the filmmaker photoshopped in (which image had an unknown copyright status), and the fact that many of these images incorporate elements that were clearly remixed by this uploader in some way, I think it's reasonable to be concerned that many if not most of these files fail COM:FU.

This includes all uploads by Vergelbradford except for File:Bookbinder4.jpg, which I will nominate separately as a materially different rationale applies to it. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 00:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

¨PARA INVESTIGAR: ¿Delete o solamente marcar como vándalo? Este usuario parece haber sido un disfraz para hacer tonterías. No parece que esté respondiendo mensajes. No parece tener actividad desde el 2008. Wkboonec (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No vandalismo en el lado del usuario. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per M:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge Natuur12 (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per M:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge and per community consensus. We should not delete those files before the correct discussion is evaluated. Natuur12 (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per M:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge and per community consensus. We should not delete those files before the correct discussion is evaluated. I'm really worried about this massive accion wanting to delete thousands of historic images that cost hundreds of working hours, and in most cases are imposible to recover. Isn't it sabotage?--Roblespepe (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google books has the book published in 1990 if that is the case the image will still be copyright in the US, if the book was published in 1988 then the image will be copyright in the US if the book contained a copyright notice, either way proof of how this image entered the PD in the US is required for it to remain on commons. LGA talkedits 23:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per M:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge Natuur12 (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When Pescado 2 by Pescado Rabioso was released it contained the correct copyright notices (see here) therefore this image will still be in copyright in the US. Unless it can be shown how this image has entered the PD in the US this should be deleted. LGA talkedits 00:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 21:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2070 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment What other reason would be needed to delete the file? The URAA infringement is not enough? - Fma12 (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per M:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge Natuur12 (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for promotional purpose, out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, already for 5 months, so not out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" ???? with watermark. 91.65.158.212 09:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A watermark (though unwelcome) alone is not necessarily evidence for a copyvio. This upload File:Diegoarmentano.jpg suggests that the uploader may indeed be the designer of that chair, as suggested by the watermark. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you are right. But he should get in contact with the OTRS staff, otherwise his uploads will be an neverending story, see User talk:CelsoArmentano. 91.65.158.212 11:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS -FASTILY 06:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

magazine or newspapper cover, no evidence of a free license Ezarateesteban 13:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC) The magazine has a Creative Commons 2.5 license, and I am the editor-Acutor the same [[User:Morodiexista][reply]

Please, see COM:OTRS and send an email explaining it, I can't see any evidence of free license on the photo Ezarateesteban 21:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not displayed Creative Commons license review for the journal acceded to this license later. Specifically, in August 2008. The website of this magazine can be found at http://www.clubs500.es. And the whole number (number 10 August 2006) in http://www.upv.es/~csahuqui/julio/s500/10ag2006.pdf. I reiterate that I am the editor of the magazine and this is freely copy and modifications. I am at your disposal for whatever you need. User:Morodiexista 09:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 06:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in public domain Florn (talk) 20:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From Wilder (Lezumbalaberenjena)

I posted the image of the stamps that is now marked for a possible deletion. First I would like to thank all the people who send me messages to come and comment here in order to save the images.

I believe it should remain, because is a small image of two stamps produced by the Cuban Government 49 years ago, Correos is the country's post and parcel distribution agency, they also design all stamps and envelopes). As far as I know, stuff made by the Cuban Government falls into the "social" category, meaning is "everybody's property". Honestly, I'm no joking, I know it sounds funny :-) but it is one of the Key Principles on which supposedly the Cuban Revolution was built on, and that is exactly why they called themselves "A Social (or Communist) Revolution".

I also think, that the stamps are way to old to be even consider under some sort of copyright, in any case, I think they could be saved if they could be fitted under some sort of licensing that allows you to keep small images for educational purposes, I'm not an expert, but I think Wikipedia have a license that goes around that.

Thank again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lezumbalaberenjena (talk • contribs)

 Comment Here's a link for Spanish and Law buffs: [4] --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not PD. Also, fair use/non-free content is forbidden on Commons FASTILY 06:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]