Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Non-free, zimbio is copyrighted Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
we have a few images of hoffman, but none as blurred as this one Ohconfucius (talk) 08:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, image in high use + no other image of him at the 2009 academy awards. Denniss (talk) 09:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.69.93 10:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Source: IMDb, no permission 91.65.69.93 10:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
"own work" ???? 91.65.69.93 11:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake under the wrong title Smbalmuth (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYRIGHT, cannot be own work of user, photo of singer. —레비Revi 05:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Ya no son parte improtante para mi y para Wikipedia, son un material que yo ya no ocupo y que para Wikipedia tampoco, aparte es mio, y tengo derecho a que lo borren. RHSLewar (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: User talk pages oes not get deleted. JuTa 11:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Costa Rica and there is no clear statement about the publication date of this sculpture --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 00:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Bueno, en primer lugar, un saludo a todos y disculpen si escribo en español porque mi inglés no es muy fluido. En segundo lugar, agradecer que se me invitase a participar en la discusión. En tercer lugar, acerca del borrado de esta imagen, pues debo decir que no estoy de acuerdo ya que la fotografía la he tomado yo, sacando el tiempo de ir hasta el parque de Desamparados (no vivo cerca de allí), por lo tanto soy el dueño del archivo, además, la escultura no cuenta con ninguna información acerca de quién la esculpió, y conste que la busqué, pero simplemente no estaba disponible dicha información, y de todos modos, no creo que el escultor se moleste en demandar a la Wikipedia porque su obra, que es conocida por los desamparadeños que viven allí, pero en realidad desconocida para el resto del mundo, se dé a conocer. Además, creo que el propietario actual sería la Municipalidad de Desamparados, que es una institución pública que representa al pueblo desamparadeño, y francamente no creo que la municipalidad se ponga a pedir cuentas porque salió en Wikipedia la foto de una escultura del hijo predilecto del cantón, al menos en lo personal creo que más bien deberían sentirse honrados de que alrededor del mundo se conozca la imagen del primer gran novelista de la historia costarricense. Y para finalizar, en cuarto lugar, de borrarse este archivo, deberían borrarse también todas las fotos de esculturas, pinturas y otras obras ubicadas en parques y lugares públicos de Costa Rica, porque como aquí no hay libertad de panorama (que hasta tonto suena, me disculpan si el tono les parece duro), no podrían publicarse en esta web. Una vez más, agradezco que se me haya invitado a conversar y que pasen un bello día.--Rodtico21 (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Pueden publicarse en la web pero sin fines de lucro. Todos los archivos de Wikimedia Commons deben permitir el uso comercial. Por lo tanto, subir esta imagen a este proyecto puede considerarse violación de derechos de autor. Por otro lado, en Wikimedia Commons no se considera si el propietario se moleste en demandar, sino que se considera si hay una violación de derechos de autor. Si no es legal subirla a Wikimedia Commons, entonces no puede permanecer aquí. Ahora, para establecer si esta escultura puede publicarse bajo una licencia libre, entonces hay que demostrar que su autor (en caso de que este se el propietario) ha fallecido hace más de 70 años. Si el propietario es una institución, entonces hay que demostrar que la escultura fue puesta en público hace más de 70 años. Si no se cumple ninguna de estas condiciones, entonces no puede publicar bajo una licencia libre. --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 16:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Pues en ese caso mejor borrarla, porque tiene 52 años de estar en ese parque, así que en 18 años más hablamos.--Rodtico21 (talk) 01:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Pueden publicarse en la web pero sin fines de lucro. Todos los archivos de Wikimedia Commons deben permitir el uso comercial. Por lo tanto, subir esta imagen a este proyecto puede considerarse violación de derechos de autor. Por otro lado, en Wikimedia Commons no se considera si el propietario se moleste en demandar, sino que se considera si hay una violación de derechos de autor. Si no es legal subirla a Wikimedia Commons, entonces no puede permanecer aquí. Ahora, para establecer si esta escultura puede publicarse bajo una licencia libre, entonces hay que demostrar que su autor (en caso de que este se el propietario) ha fallecido hace más de 70 años. Si el propietario es una institución, entonces hay que demostrar que la escultura fue puesta en público hace más de 70 años. Si no se cumple ninguna de estas condiciones, entonces no puede publicar bajo una licencia libre. --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 16:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Several of the arguments made by Rodtico21 in his first comment above are explicitly covered in COM:PRP which he may find useful. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Probably copyvio, watermarked. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Used as vandalism. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete Seems to be of minimal encyclopedic value (if any). Tabercil (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Spam, advertisement added to the picture. --Kolja21 (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Copied from [1] Emergency doc (talk) 00:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
unsharp, out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Common Internet GIF has been online since at least 2006—no indication that user is the original author or able to place GIF in public domain czar ♔ 03:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope. —레비Revi 04:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope. —레비Revi 04:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope —레비Revi 04:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope. —레비Revi 04:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete no Freedom of Panorama in France for modern buildings Wladyslaw (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Daher weht der Wind: [2]. Der Antragsteller duldet keine anderen Götter neben sich! Die Brücke ist mindestens zur Hälfte deutsch. Wenn überhaupt, dann gehört das Bild auf Wikipedia verschoben und nicht gelöscht. --Andreas Schwarzkopf (talk) 08:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Bitte sachlich bleiben und keine persönlichen Anwürfe. Einzig relevant ist, dass das Bild vom französischen Boden aus gemacht wurde und hat damit auf Commons nichts verloren. Wenn das Bild bei WP hochgeladen wird mit entsprechenden Hinweis so bleibt die Tatsache davon unberührt, dass es hier gelöscht werden muss. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Andreas, das ist eine unbelegte Unterstellung! Selbstverständlich kann das Bild, wenn hier auf Löschung entschieden wird, nach :de kopiert werden; das macht aber erst dann Sinn. Zunächst ist mal zu klären, ob die Brücke nach franz. Recht (siehe Commons:FOP#France) als wahrscheinlich (Sicherheit kann nur ein Gerichtsurteil bringen) geschützt anzusehen ist. Ich würde das tendenziell bejahen, da die Gestaltung kaum als rein funktional betrachtet werden kann. Es wäre aber nicht schlecht, zur Klärung dieser Frage einen franz. Kollegen (z.B. User:PierreSelim) zu konsultieren. --Túrelio (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sie ist nicht nur unbelegt sondern auch offensichtlich an den Haaren herbei gezogen. Im entsprechenden Artikel existiert nämlich bereits ein Bild, welches von französischer Seite aus gemacht wurde. Besagtes Bild wurde nur auf de.wiki hochgeladen. Ich bin ein verfechter der Panoramafreiheit und finde die Regelung Frankreichs auch schlecht. Das ändert nichts daran, dass es hier Regeln gibt, die es gilt einzuhalten. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Wie soll man bei einem offensichtlichen Trollantrag sachlich bleiben? Dass die Brücke bzw. die sichtbaren Details urheberrechtlich geschützt sind, ist nicht erwiesen. Als Werk kann man sie nicht einfach Frankreich zuschlagen, denn nach deutschem Recht ist auch ein vom französischen Boden aus gemachtes Bild legal --Historiograf (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Auf französischem Boden gilt französisches Recht. Deutsches Recht findet in Frankreich keine Anwendung. Der "Trollantrag" hat ein Nachspiel. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ui ein Nachspiel - welches denn? Bei den Userproblemen hat man offenbar Wichtigeres zu tun als solchem albernen Gepetze nachzugehen. Statt die Brücke im Dorf zu lassen, quengelt der Urheber der vom anderen Ufer gemachten Abbildung, dass die gegenüberliegende Ansicht unbedingt weg muss. Wenn der Architekt ein Franzose ist, kann man ja auch fordern dass das Foto des Löschantragsstellers weg muss --Historiograf (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dann mach das doch und klopf nicht nur Sprüche. Genau aus diesem Grund, habe ich auf Commons nur Bilder von der deutschen Seite hochgeladen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ui ein Nachspiel - welches denn? Bei den Userproblemen hat man offenbar Wichtigeres zu tun als solchem albernen Gepetze nachzugehen. Statt die Brücke im Dorf zu lassen, quengelt der Urheber der vom anderen Ufer gemachten Abbildung, dass die gegenüberliegende Ansicht unbedingt weg muss. Wenn der Architekt ein Franzose ist, kann man ja auch fordern dass das Foto des Löschantragsstellers weg muss --Historiograf (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- We have here the situation, that this bridge is situated on the german-french border. The disputed image was shoot from France where french law is available. Historiografs argument that the object is not a "real french object" and therefore french law can´t be executed is not comprehensible. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately it's true. The architect is Dietmar Feichtinger who is a France resident, so I guess he can refer to French law concerning any photo of his work taken in France. That's just logical. --A.Savin 20:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete There is no reason a bridge that complex wouldn't get protected by droit d'auteur in France (for further reading COM:FOP#France) --PierreSelim (talk) 10:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photograph this bridge from the German side of the river High Contrast (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted ad. — Yerpo Eh? 06:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyrigt violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Never existing Italian traffic sign Gigillo83 (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, he is right. It doesn't appear on the Codice della strada italian. File that must be cancelled. -- Gi87 (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- i thonk it was a road sign, instead it was advice --Florixc (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Coat of arms was taken from this site, possible copyright violation, which makes it the coat of arms of the family Op den Camp and not Schoester Dqfn13 (talk) 08:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality image, unclear what it is. JurgenNL (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is a 2D derivative image in Russia which has no COM:FOP. Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
File needs an OTRS ticket 91.65.69.93 10:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Architect Pierre Bourdeix died in 1987 [3]. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 10:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Architect Michel Roux-Spitz died in 1957. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 10:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Too recent building. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 10:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Too recent building located in France (no FoP in France). Aga (d) 10:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Uncomplete map, substituted by a better svg image (File:Mappa ferrovia Porto Ceresio-Milano.svg). I'm the author of both. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 10:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Too recent building. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 10:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Tony Garnier (architect) died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 10:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Architect Tony Garnier died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 10:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I've moved it to fr:wp, you can delete it from here. JeanBono (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Architect Tony Garnier died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 11:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Architect Tony Garnier died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 11:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Architect Tony Garnier died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 11:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Map with some mistakes, substituted by a better svg map (File:Mappa ferrovia Vercelli-Pavia.svg). I'm the author of both. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Article Christoph Santifaller speedy deleted on de WP. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Article Christoph Santifaller speedy deleted on de-WP. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Article Christoph Santifaller speedy deleted on de-WP. No further use. WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Because i want to upload a better version of this FidanKolgeci (talk) 12:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Double of Russula mustelina.jpg Thiotrix (talk) 12:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
@ Thiotrix, please give complete file links. --High Contrast (talk) 13:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Both are in use -- pick one or the other and replace the other before reopening this DR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image appears on many web sites without a free license. The uploader is not the author and therre is no evidence of permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar better focused image File:Ab plant 1959.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2075 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2083 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Broken SVG file which based on the file name seems to duplicate File:Flag of Haiti.svg. Stefan4 (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because the consensus from Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs#United Kingdom precludes the PD-Art justification in the UK. Duffit5 (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I think the photographer did not add sufficient creativity to be eligible for copyright. Also EXIF says 'out of copyright' - Jcb (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Painting in PD for several decades and per "Wikimedia Commons explicitly permits the hosting of photographs that carefully reproduce a two-dimensional public domain work" in Commons:Reuse_of_PD-Art_photographs. Tm (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: That may be, but WMF policy is clear and firm -- we apply PD-art to any image of flat art that is itself PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. Stefan4 (talk) 15:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: I checked with the organizers and they said all attendees could take photos of the football game, logos, sidelines, etc. I didn't think I needed anything else.Vortex4id (talk) 04:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: You can take photos, but you can't license them for commercial use, as required by Commons, without permission of the copyright holders of the thinks you photograph. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata, uploaded with copyvios of similar subject matter (see user talk/deleted contribs). Quack. Эlcobbola talk 15:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This logo is com:TOO and there is no evidence that the club gave his permission to use this logo under the mentioned license. Maybe it is pd but we don't know how old this specific logo is. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused logo and the logo is com:TOO in The Netherlands. No evidence of permission or that this logo is in the public domain, Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
logo is com:TOO in The Netherlands. No evidence of permission or that this logo is in the public domain Natuur12 (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
logo is com:TOO in The Netherlands. No evidence of permission or that this logo is in the public domain Natuur12 (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
logo is com:TOO in The Netherlands. No evidence of permission or that this logo is in the public domain Natuur12 (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope+spam(?) from wikireality.ru (you can find this site in global blacklist) /St1995 16:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
P.S. Material from this site (wikireality.ru) maybe copyrighted. Per this, tag {{Cc-zero}} is not valid. /St1995 16:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- A Russian Wikipedia-related poster in Public Domain. Please do not erase the source reference, as CC-0 1.0 waiver may be verifyed there. --Akim Dubrow (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Copyright is ok. But "0" education value. See PS#Examples (n. 2,4). ==> Delete /St1995 20:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's what you say. Unlike you i don't participate in "off-ruwiki-wars" but i suppose that most exemplary agitational materials should be kept, it may be used in wikinews or elsewhere. And i'm not the author and don't understand what "advertisement" you mean. --Akim Dubrow (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Copyright is ok. But "0" education value. See PS#Examples (n. 2,4). ==>
Kept:. Ладно, раз для истории пригодится, значит так тому и быть. Оставил как номинатор. /St1995 15:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Albert Decaris died in 1988 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France) Florn (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Pierre Gandon died in 1990 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in Ukraine.--MainFrame (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in Ukraine.--MainFrame (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Albert Decaris died in 1988 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Raoul Serres died in 1971 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Henry Cheffer died in 1957 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Raoul Serres died in 1971 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Gabriel-Antoine Barlangue died in 1956 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Henry Cheffer died in 1957 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
logo is com:TOO in The Netherlands. No evidence of permission or that this logo is in the public domain Natuur12 (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Achille Ouvré died in 1951 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Achille Ouvré died in 1951 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as George Henri Prudhomme died in 1947 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Since this was made on 25-05-1923, it is now PD in France, but the URAA will have restored its US copyright until 95 years after that date, so undelete in 2019 instead. Platonides (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Albert Decaris died in 1988 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Raoul Serres died in 1971 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Achille Ouvré died in 1951 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Albert Decaris died in 1988 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France). Florn (talk) 18:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD Avi (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: a personal photo of a tourist eating ice cream. Eleassar (t/p) 20:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: It is a good photo of that subject, the only we have in our Category:People eating ice cream (which is shockingly underpopulated, granted) to show someone who is even not positively skinny (which is an important aspect of ice cream eating, of course), one of the few portraying an adult doing so, and one of the few such photos taken in the 21st century. Also, it is an excellent image to illustrate any kind of “tourist’s snack break”, with good technical photographic quality (in spite of medium resolution), plus great framing and composition. -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. I had second thoughts about this image before you posted here, so thanks a lot for the comment.
I withdraw my nomination --Eleassar (t/p) 19:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. I had second thoughts about this image before you posted here, so thanks a lot for the comment.
Kept: Nomination withdrawn; image appears to be in the scope of the Commons. Avi (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unclear, unrecognisable motif. Eleassar (t/p) 20:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
File:C'est moi Rindra-Rejoinger sur facebook- http---www-facebook-com-rindra-nyaiko 2014-02-04 12-58.jpg
[edit]private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
File:عبيد الدوسري ( بوتشي) ليست اللاعب الدولي السابق عبيد الدوسري وﻻكنه طالب في المرحله الثانويه ( نظام مقررات ) انسان طب 2014-02-05 02-13.jpg
[edit]private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 20:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
File:เชาวฤทธิ์ ธรรมโรจน์ (joke)-เกิดวันที่ 29 สิงหาคม 1986-มีพี่ฝาแฝด ชื่อ นางสาว สุมณฑา ธ 2014-02-05 11-53.jpg
[edit]private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Esto es un Naney, nacido el 22 de mayo de 1998- El es un bicho rara vez producido q posee un severo retardo mental como podemos apreciar en la imagen- Esta malformacion genetica-muy extraña solo se presenta c 2014-02-04 21-13.jpg
[edit]private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope, no encyclopedic value Indeedous (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
File:This is the image of YASIK MT, belongs Malappuram district of kerala, currently preparing for Indian civil service examination- He is doing a open research in emotional control which how it leads to succeed in 2014-02-05 23-33.jpg
[edit]private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope (3.4.3 - not legitimately in use) Avi (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of the things on the screen. Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep? I've blurred screen content to a substantial degree, so maybe the file should be kept. Comments? -Mardus (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Blanking the screen would definitely be acceptable; no opinion on blurring. GregorB (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)- I'd keep it now. Capmo (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Screen blanked. Avi (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
46.176.50.88 14:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Disrespectful image snubbing Hellenic dominance in the area. 46.176.50.88 14:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Oppose These flag maps are made to show/ present the irredentistic movements. There are many maps of this kind: Greater Indonesia, Greater Serbia, Greater Croatia, Greater Hungary, etc. No need to delete it--Никола Стоіаноски 16:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
If there is a group of a few thousand people, against 2,5 million of other inhabitants, is it still an "irredentistic movement" ? See the Helsinki Commitee reports on Greek Macedonia, for a data, numbers. It's a shame for Wiki to publish such a "kulturkampf". --91.140.107.216 08:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This photo claims Greek territorial land as non Greek. Theseusaegean (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it's a flag map that shows irredentistic point of view. There are a lot of maps like this one, take a look here. Keep the file, again. This is the second time. Some users don't get it that these kinds of maps are made to show irredentism. There are many maps here of nationalistic super countries.--Никола Стоіаноски 23:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is NOT an irridentist map this is a south slavic NATIONALIST expansionist map whose borders never existed, especially with the south slavs at the helm. This map is an EXPANSIONIST map that does not show old borders lost (irredentist) but an agenda for future ones to be created (nation building). This agenda and thus this map is condemned by the UN Security Council. It violates the territorial integrity of a sovereign and indigenous nation and has no educational value whatsoever. This very aggressive expansionist agenda and relentless attacks via expansionist maps such as this is the cause of destabilization in the region and promises more confidence to execute the agenda with every expansionist map allowed to go public. Unless wikipedia is a platform for expansionists to push their agenda, deletion is more than justified both legally and academically.--Vergiotisa (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is a useless, not educational promotion of expansionism. Should be deleted per Commons:Deletion policy.
- Delete This photo claims Greek territorial land as non Greek. Vergiotisa (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This photo is an expansionist map that claims Greek territorial land as non Greek, 85.72.89.55 05:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This pic clearly shows that the Yugoslav's want to take Greek land & make it their own. With pics like this, it might mean that a future war is eminent. Lm240specz (talk) 07:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per Стоіаноски and please read Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. Natuur12 (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo claims Greek territorial land as non Greek. It is a nationalist expansionist map. That borders never existed in the past. It is a nationalist expansioning dream by occuping a territory that belongs to neighbour country. 2A02:587:9C2C:1900:18D:7FF5:811F:2F24 13:55, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Just like this map ;) BTW that's the point of these maps, irredentism. --Никола Стоіаноски 18:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (see former DR). Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
According to EXIF data, flickr description, and flickr file's watermark, this seems to be COM:FLICKRWASHING. —레비Revi 04:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe I don't understand but this is the original image on commons and it says its free to modify (ie: crop), so why is this up for deletion? Lady Lotus (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Then original work should be deleted too. —레비Revi 11:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Why? It's under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Lady Lotus (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- See EXIF info and you can see file is from external site, and in original flickr file, you can see watermark linking to external site same with EXIF data. So it is probably copyrighted.—레비Revi 11:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ahhh fair enough. Delete away :) Lady Lotus (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I found it here with it crediting x17online as author. Lady Lotus (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I cannot see evidence of permission from x17online.com. —레비Revi 12:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I found it here with it crediting x17online as author. Lady Lotus (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ahhh fair enough. Delete away :) Lady Lotus (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- See EXIF info and you can see file is from external site, and in original flickr file, you can see watermark linking to external site same with EXIF data. So it is probably copyrighted.—레비Revi 11:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Why? It's under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Lady Lotus (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Then original work should be deleted too. —레비Revi 11:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Unless it is clear that uploader is x17online uploader, it should be deleted.—레비Revi 12:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I am afraid the nominator is correct. The flickr account owner took this image from another website and placed it on his/her flickr account but the flickr account owner doesn't own the rights to this photo. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- It should be deleted, I have no attachment to this photo, I just uploaded the cropped version. Lady Lotus (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: per above. --NahidSultan (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Info Original source might be (per above, even with a different watermark) http://www.x17online.com/gallery/view_gallery.php?gallery=mcyrus062812_X17 (Copyright ©2014 X17, Inc. All rights reserved) = http://www.x17online.com/gallery/galleries/2012/06/mcyrus062812_X17/full/mcyrus062812_07.jpg (identical exif), posted on 29.06.2012 versus 24.07.2012 upload date at Flickr. Gunnex (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- It should be deleted, I have no attachment to this photo, I just uploaded the cropped version. Lady Lotus (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Those logo's are com:TOO in The Netherlands. There is no evidence of permission or that these logo's are in the public domain
- File:G.S.T.V. Tritanium Logo.pdf
- File:Logo T.M.F.V. Archigenes.jpg
- File:Logoidun.png
- File:VESTING Logo.jpg
- File:Wapen Pharmaciae Sacrum.gif
Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence of permission and those wepons are not made by the Dutch government. They are com:TOO and there is no evidence of permission.
Natuur12 (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Appear to be derivative works: photographs of publication covers
- File:Iqbal Unisvi Sadi Mein By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Iqbal Aur Dilli By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Iqbal Aur Darul Iqbal Bhopal By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Hayat Abul Kalam Azad By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Ghalibyat By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Dhanpat Rai Nawab Rai Prem Chand Edited By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Abul Kalam Azad By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Appear to be derivative works: photographs of publication covers
- File:Jawahir O Azad Edited By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Iqbaliyat Ke Talash By Abdul qavi Desnavi.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 15:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Appear to be derivative works: photographs of publication covers
- File:Matahayat By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Main Urdu Hoon By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
- File:Lissan Nulsidq Edited By Abdul Qavi Desnavi.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 16:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per Elcobbola High Contrast (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CrazyDeath212121 (talk · contribs)
[edit]After today identifying around 10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Facebook-accounts, blogs, Google Street View, official sites etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. All files uploaded in a row on 26.12.2012. +23 copyvios so far. Some of the files black&whited (e.g. a Google Street View screenshot). Most uploads related to Mexican university en:Instituto Politécnico Nacional.
- File:ESIA TIC.jpg
- File:CECYT 4 IPN IPN.jpg
- File:CINVESTAV.jpg
- File:AGUILAS BLANCAS IPN.jpg
- File:Plano IPN.jpg
- File:ESIA ZAC.jpg
- File:CICS UMA.jpg
- File:CECYT 1.jpg
- File:CECYT 13.jpg
- File:CECYT 10.jpg
- File:CECYT 11.jpg
- File:CECYT 9.jpg
- File:CECYT 6.jpg
- File:CECYT 7.jpg
- File:CECYT 4.jpg
- File:CECYT 3.jpg
- File:ESCA UST.jpg
- File:CECYT 2.jpg
- File:WILFRIDO.jpg
- File:Unidad Profesional IPN.jpg
- File:UPZ.jpg
- File:UPIICSA.jpg
- File:UPZ (2).jpg
- File:ESIME ZAC.jpg
- File:ESIME ALLE.jpg
- File:CARRILLON.jpg
- File:BNCT.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: the nominator pointed it out High Contrast (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Incorrectly licensed images from the KB Flickr stream
[edit]- File:Sierpapier (8074154268).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074158613).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074158775).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074158969).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074159317).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074159421).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074166338).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074166482).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074166644).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074166924).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074168802) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074170660) (2).jpg - No clear date unfortunately
- File:Sierpapier (8074170985).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074171665) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074171937).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074172113).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074172299).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074173739) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074173917) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074175861) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074175987) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074176205) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074176407) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074176665) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074176871) (2).jpg
- File:Sierpapier (8074177247) (2).jpg - Work is PD, but the photograph is not i guess
All these files were transferred from the Flickr stream of the Dutch National Library (Koninklijke Bibliotheek). Unfortunately, CC-BY-SA was set recursively for all of these files, even if copyright restrictions were unclear. I'm looking through all KB-files from Flickr, trying to find out which are PD and which should be deleted. 
Husky (talk to me) 12:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, seems to make sense to delete these files --OlafJanssen (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Not own work, but crop of http://www.adriaan-homepage.nl/pages/foto_fans/058.html with undisclosed copyright Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Not own work, taken from http://adriaan-homepage.nl/foto_nieuw/153_medewerkers01_gr.jpg. Has undisclosed copyright Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1973, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2068 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality. Not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:Bag-i-Alam Gumbad 07.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too blurred, and it is superseded by better quality image. According to scope policy the file is not realistically educationally useful, if it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. So it's out of scope and it may be deleted. The better file may be kept. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Not own work, but taken from http://www.adriaan-homepage.nl/index_welkom/fotos_filmpjes_biografie/losse_pagina/48.html which has undisclosed copyright Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Same as File:Plans des ports de France (1777) - Rade et environs de Brest.jpg but lower res Ancalagon (talk) 10:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate scan of the same map with lower resolution Alpertron (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1978, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2073 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 22:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1980, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2075 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 22:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1980, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2075 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work; photograph of film poster. Per COM:CRT, Bulgaria is +70 pma (work is dated 1952, so cannot be PD) Эlcobbola talk 18:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
crop from http://www.anp-archief.nl/page/216029/nl by different author, so not own work and above all released as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- But the original is not a share-alike and this is a derivative work, so it may be acceptable, no? -- Avi (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- NoDerivs means "If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material" and Noncommercial means "You may not use the material for commercial purposes". Both requirements are incompatible with Commons. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1987, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2082 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 22:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Low quality. Not used personal image. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Same as File:Plans des ports de France (1777) - Provinces maritimes de France.jpg but lower res Ancalagon (talk) 10:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate scan of the same map with lower resolution Alpertron (talk) 17:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: http://profesor-daniel-alberto-chiarenza.blogspot.com.ar (source) is not http://www.presidencia.gov.ar/ as suggested by used license {{CC-AR-Presidency}}. Gunnex (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded similar, a bit less blurred image File:Mubarak Khan- Ka-Gumbaz 904.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by less blurred File:Mubarak Khan- Ka-Gumbaz 904.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too blurred. The other one is clearer. So this worse photo is out of scope, because similar better quality file exists. According to scope policy the file is not realistically educationally useful, if it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
com:DW, the desing on these plactic baggs is copyrighted. Especially the first one is above the threashold and is most likely copyrighted. Someone might want to rationalyse this under de minimis but the plastic bag are clearly the subject. Someone might want to rationalyse this mentioning Ets-Hokin v Skyy Spirits Inc but the discription on the first bag is in German. And this is much more complicated than some logo's on whiskybottles. Natuur12 (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1980, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2075 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1988, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2083 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1988, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2083 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1979, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2074 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo not in public domain at URAA date 01 January 1996 Alpertron (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:The tomb of Ferozshah II 120.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too blurred. The other one is much better quality. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:The tomb of Ferozshah II 126.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too blurred. The other one is much better quality. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:The tomb of Ferozshah II 126.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly too blurred. The other one is much better quality. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:Tomb of Khan-i-Khana 924.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly too blurred. The other one is much better quality. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Overexposed, blurred. Superseded by File:Tomb of Khan-i-Khana 924.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too poor quality. The other one is much better. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Overexposed and blurred image not used in other Wikimedia projects. Better quality image already present. Alpertron (talk) 17:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Appropriately replaced in all instances with SVG counterparts, aesthetically unpleasant for road signs.
- File:P1.png
- File:P10.png
- File:P11.png
- File:P13.png
- File:P15.png
- File:P16.png
- File:P17.png
- File:P2.png
- File:P23.png
- File:P24.png
- File:P25.png
- File:P27.png
- File:P3.png
- File:P30.png
- File:P32.png
- File:P37.png
- File:P4.png
- File:P44.png
- File:P5.png
- File:P6-LV.png
- File:P61.png
- File:P62.png
- File:P63.png
- File:P64.png
- File:P65.png
- File:P69.png
- File:P7.png
- File:P78.png
- File:P79.png
- File:P8.png
- File:P82.png
- File:P85.png
- File:P87.png
- File:P89.png
- File:P9.png
- File:P90LV.png
- File:P92.png
- File:P93.png
- File:P94.png
- File:P97.png
- File:P98.png
- File:P99.png
Mahir256 (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
These seem to be replaced in all instances with the appropriate SVGs.
- File:Županijska cesta 3106 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 3175 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 5155 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 5165 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 6071 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 6112 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 6208 (Croatia).png
- File:Županijska cesta 6232 (Croatia).png
Mahir256 (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused PNGs that don't match the actual font used in Croatia.
Mahir256 (talk) 22:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Flickrwashing? All photos uploaded to Flickr today and the Flickr user is a member since this month.
- File:CHB-Evo. Disassembled.jpg
- File:Geneva Auto Convention 2011 Switzerland.jpg
- File:NR- Linear Suspension 2.jpg
- File:NR-Linear Suspension.jpg
- File:NR-1 Supermileage Vehicle 1 Liter per 100 km.jpg
- File:Geneva Auto Convention Show 2011 ---NIAMA-REISSER, LLC Booth.jpg
- File:CHB-Evo. Internal Combustion Engine --Assembled.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
What has become of Wikipedia
[edit]First of all, I want to introduce myself, my name is Heinz-Gustav Reisser. Al Reim has approached me months back about writing an article on the company, products, etc. Since then, I had provided to her in writing permission to use a selected group of photos, pictures, etc.
Now, the week before last, she approached me about wikipedia or wikimedia commons, as it turns out, deleted all of the pictures due to supposed copyright issues.
She tried uploading the pictures again, without any success, even after re-uploading a renamed file of the same picture.
So, she turned to me. Well, I am not amused at this kind of conduct treating a person who is new to any organization, etc. Up to this day she has issues, for whatever reason, with the articles.
I am not amused at the negative press that my company is getting with articles that have a "Delete" marked on them. I am still debating about this fact.
Regardless, the NEGATIVITY that is going on here with Al Reim's contributions to Wiki are mindbogeling. I have no Idea what is being stipulated in terms of the pictures now. Well my company, NIAMA-REISSER, LLC, never had a Flickr account, so what, --What is the big deal that I had my staff create a flickr account last week to facilitate a smooth upload of a new set of pictures, which are rightfully my company's.
Looking at the posts, etc. I believe that people have issues with Novices writing articles on the wiki platform. Well, isn't wiki and its volunteers here to help each other out? Why lash out at some articles and let others pass? Furthermore, why accuse and stipulate the Flickr account creation?
The User Stefan4 and some others clearly have issues with new users submitting content --it is obvious from his stipulation Flickrwashing!!!. Wiki is an open platform for everybody who qualifies. NIAMA-REISSER, LLC does qualify, in all of our eyes, in light of our 140 + years of heritage, innovations, global presence and patented technology.
Why put the burden on Al Reim to find all the GOOD and APPROVED References to our company, technology and products. Instead of deleting newbie pages within 5 seconds of uploading, users should engage and research the matter before going out there and deleting pages wildly.
I understand the masses of new contributions that you receive daily and appreciate your volunteer work, but don't let the 100s or 1000s of bad articles cloud your judgement on the good and rightfully belonging ones.
I encourage wiki uses to take Al's articles and put categories on them and fix the obvious FORMATTING issues that might persist and keep adding REFERENCES and changing them into the appropriate style.
As Al put it, and I have to conclude after Stefan4 actions/comment, everybody is ganging up on the Al's contributions, because some form of it was deleted more than once prior to having successfully edited it, etc.
Stop, and hop of the bandwagon and fulfill your volunteer duties to your best abilities, as I know you can.
I know Wikipedia is better than this.
Should anybody have an issue with my authenticity, which I am sure that some of you will raise before even reading the first sentence, please call my office at 877 829 2419 or e-mail at admin@niamareisser.com.
Sincerely,
Heinz-Gustav Reisser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heinz-Gustav Reisser (talk • contribs) 2014-02-09T20:27:08 (UTC)
- If someone creates a Flickr account under a corporate name and uploads images to Flickr and then immediately copies those images to Commons, then this usually means that the uploader is creating a fake Flickr account in order to fool Commons to accept the images in violation of the copyright of the images. This is what it looks like here. If this isn't the case, then I think that Niama-Reisser, LLC should confirm to OTRS that the Flickr account indeed does belong to Niama-Reisser, LLC. You can find some instructions at COM:OTRS.
- Some of the text above refers to the discussion at w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niama-Reisser, LLC. Whether Wikipedia decides to keep or delete the article is one thing, and whether Commons decides to keep or delete the images is a separate thing. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed. INeverCry 18:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krisi tranchev.1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of posters. Per COM:CRT, Bulgaria is pma +70. These are from the 1970s (e.g. File:7b13b049.jpg is 1972, File:54f5c593.jpg is 1975, etc.) so cannot yet be PD.
Эlcobbola talk 18:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rooster1739 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. File:Camengual.jpg previously published via http://www.elderechodigital.com/cultural/articulo57.html (last modified: 06.2011) = http://www.elderechodigital.com/cultural/falsasventanas2.jpg (last modified: 06.2011), File:Luisfer.jpg grabbed on 07.07.2011 somewhere from internet to "illustrate" an article at eswiki, created by uploader on same day (see also thumbnail-jpg, last modified 05.2011).
Gunnex (talk) 20:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Travieso93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering the recently detected 8 copyvios (details via User talk:Travieso93).
Gunnex (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikimedia must file 2257 Regulations documents in order to keep this file; US law requires that the Wikimedia Foundation obtain and maintain records proving that the model is of legal age. Unless it's done this image must be deleted. The same is true for just about ALL the image in Category:Nudes-A-Poppin' 2009 which show identifiable people. 65.78.114.251 09:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep You are wrong, see Help:Sexual_content#The_Child_Protection_and_Obscenity_Enforcement_Act: "Wikimedia Foundation's counsel has advised that Wikimedia Commons and other projects are under no obligation to keep records on the age and identity of models shown in media depicting sexually explicit conduct." The Nudes-A-Poppin events BTW are for a large (presumably paying) public, but organised by some private corporation or society on grounds owned by some club, in Indiana. Given the current state of US laws, I'm very confident they make damn sure that no minors are even present at the event, let alone among those displaying themselves. --Vydra (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- "organised by some private corporation or society on grounds owned by some club, in Indiana" has no legal bearing. In fact, they could have the legal age of 12 in there for argument's sake (it doesn't matter whether that club in Indian did everything by the book, that has no legal bearing on OUR problem.). The law by which the Wikimedia Foundation is bound to is 18 U.S.C. § 2257. And the law is simply not met in this situation. I doubt they have any intention to start book-keeping all these images and that's why they have to be deleted. --65.78.114.251 00:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Your quoted text references http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=39225950&oldid=39225824 where a claim is made that the Foundation is 'not the producer' of the images. This assessment is actually wrong. The law is VERY clear about "secondary producers" = anyone who "publishes, reproduces, or reissues" explicit material. Wikimedia does all these things thereby are legally bound to the 2257 filing. --65.78.114.251 23:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Moreover, recently (July 18, 2013), in FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al v. THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. (see ruling here) a federal judge struck down the argument of free speech with regard to 18 U.S.C. § 2257. The ruling pretty much cements the book-keeping requirements. The Wikimedia Foundation is not exempt from that law for some magic reason... --65.78.114.251 23:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Then make your case elsewhere. The current status is that Commons says it does not need to keep those records. If you want to change that, start in a more appropriate venue. A deletion request for a specific image is the wrong place. --Vydra (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per Vydra Denniss (talk) 12:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
This file was uploaded by someone not affiliated with Nudes a poppin. The onwer of the pic has not right to associate the pic with this listing. Please remove ASAP!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chitownkindaguy (talk • contribs) 01:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Possibly a case of Commons:License laundering —P. S. Burton (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I found this image searching Fickr for files with the right CC-license, and did not expect there would be any problem with this particular file. Why do you suspect license laundering? --Arjuno (talk) 01:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- I find it unlikely that the original uploader on Flickr holds the rights to release this image under a CC-license. The copyright most likely lies with the original photographer or photo agency. Please search for image "2667350" at gettyimages.com for more information about this image. —P. S. Burton (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I see the image is managed by Getty Images and that the photographer is registered there as "Jones", which differs from the username of the Flickr uploader. This would indeed seem to make the copyright of the Flickr uploader questionable. -- Arjuno (talk) 02:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Account of a Theater company uploading a press image of unknown source Denniss (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Possibly a case of Commons:License laundering —P. S. Burton (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I found this image searching Fickr for files with the right CC-license, and did not expect there would be any problem with this particular file. Why do you suspect license laundering? --Arjuno (talk) 01:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- I find it unlikely that the original uploader on Flickr holds the rights to release this image under a CC-license. The copyright most likely lies with the original photographer or photo agency. Please search for image "2667350" at gettyimages.com for more information about this image. —P. S. Burton (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I see the image is managed by Getty Images and that the photographer is registered there as "Jones", which differs from the username of the Flickr uploader. This would indeed seem to make the copyright of the Flickr uploader questionable. -- Arjuno (talk) 02:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Account of a Theater company uploading a press image of unknown source Denniss (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Motherland monument is built in 1981 and the other monument 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981/1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981/1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981/1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Ya no es necesario esa imagen en mi cuenta, no cumple ni un rol. No aporta para mi y Wikipedia. Genzo! (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1971, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2066 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by VijayAnandActor (no permission) McZusatz (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). It was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). It was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). It was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). It was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- This is probably more a view of the park (Park Slavy) than a view focused on the monument — NickK (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: De minimis Natuur12 (talk) 19:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). It was put up in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Ya no es necesario esa imagen en mi cuenta, no cumple ni un rol. No aporta para mi y Wikipedia. Genzo! (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Ya no es necesario esa imagen en mi cuenta, no cumple ni un rol. No aporta para mi y Wikipedia. Genzo! (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
negrito45.png Eririyus (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Je voudrais remplacer cette photo personnelle par une autre Pgautl35 (talk) 10:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Die Rechte zur Veröffentlichung unter der derzeitigen CC Lizenz sind nicht gegeben, weder die des Urhebers noch die der dargestellten Personen. 93.104.144.94 15:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is an Logo with an trademark sign (®), but we use logos without it Grüße s2cchstDisk 15:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This stamp is not in the public domain as Pierre Gandon died in 1990 (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France) Florn (talk) 16:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Bonjour
- Ok, je pensais que c'etait 70 ans date de l'oeuvre, j'ai donc mis un lien externe vers un visuel de qualité
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
I only can say I requested help and info about this to an User from Ukraine, because I am not Ukranian and I don´t have easy access to this.
Of course I don´t have any doubt about Kulmalukko (talk) opinion. This debate about Intelectual Property in public spaces is always interesting.
Thank you for your good job Kulmalukko
Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 09:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (en:User:Vankalapatianvesh/sandbox). Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
http://www.reverbnation.com/page_object/page_object_photos/artist_1136468?sel_photo_id=11929248&onphotoview=increment_lp_photo_views Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is scanned from a book and not likely own work. Laurence Watcher (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is scanned from a document and not likely own work Laurence Watcher (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is scanned from a book and not likely own work Laurence Watcher (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is scanned from a book and not likely own work Laurence Watcher (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is not likely own work. Laurence Watcher (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: NANA_Kissi, Copyright holder: @RofaGH". Requires permission to license and distribute. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: need OTRS ticket here. Ruthven (msg) 12:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
This flag is available in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Ce fichier est visiblement issu d'une capture d'image, à voir l'inscription "Blick" dans le coin en haut à droite. Bounè rodzo (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Salgo Feo, Solamente esa razon, me veo mal. Genzo! (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Esta imagen ya no me es necesario para mi cuenta y mis asuntos de aportar con Wikipedia. Genzo! (talk) 21:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Al igual que la imagen anterior, esta imagen ya no me es necesario para mi cuenta y mis asuntos de aportar con Wikipedia. Genzo! (talk) 21:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Al igual que las anteriores, para mi esta imagen ya no me sirve, ademas para mi ya no es un aporte para wikipedia, como lo fue hace tiempo. Genzo! (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Esa ya no es mi firma, la he cambiado, subiré otra mas adelante con mi firma actual. Genzo! (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Al igual que las demás imagenes que mande a eliminar, esta imagen ya no cumple un rol útil o importante para mi y wikipedia, por favor borrelo. Genzo! (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Ya no es necesario esa imagen en mi cuenta, no cumple ni un rol. Genzo! (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Gamalost-NorwegianOldCheese.jpg Themightyquill (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time Denniss (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Une des quatre arches du stade de Gerland classées Monument historique du 20ème siècle.JPG
[edit]Architect Tony Garnier died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 11:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- C'est mon propre travail. Je n'ai pas le droit de photographier ce que je veux ? Dans ce cas, on devrait aussi interdire de la regarder avec nos propres yeux. Sinon, pas de raison de supprimer ma photo, sinon on serait obliger de supprimer beaucoup de photos... Myrelingues (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by almost similar image (a bit better focused on the flower) File:Ab plant 2019.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not FOP (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in Ukraine.--MainFrame (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, в Украине нет свободы панорамы. Taivo (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image (with a bit more light) exists: File:Pechersk 8970.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, but as there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, both are deleted.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Чтобы сохранить эти фотографии в Викискладе, нужно получить разрешение архитектора. Taivo (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image (maybe a bit better straightened) is File:Орлика Пилипа вул., 4 (2).JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe too dark. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Is any alternative available? If not, maybe it's better to have a low-quality but still informative image than no image — NickK (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- There is no alternative images of this subject. But I suspect, that this is not usable due to the lack of the light. --Kulmalukko (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, too dark. Слишком темно. Taivo (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
The file contains images that are unfree due to the lack of the freedom of panorama in Russia. Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- This file has a problem with the attribution. It contains some (maybe all) images of other authors: File:Sophia panorama 2.jpg, File:Издалека, далёка....JPG, File:Panoramic view of Vologda 2009.jpg etc. — putnik 01:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by a bit better straightened image File:2156AostaSStefanoInside.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit dark. Superseded by similar image with more light File:Akbar's Tomb 714.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant, almost similar image is File:Dadi aur Poti ka Gumbad 03.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too similar. There is no reason to keep the similar images. This is out of scope (not realistically educationally useful), because it does not give any value to the collection of the same building. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, deletion policy says: "Redundant or low quality files only get deleted on a case by case basis after they are listed at Commons:Deletion requests. At deletion requests you will need to provide reasons why a particular file is inferior to the alternative version." Taivo (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar image with better light File:Bara Khamba 17.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete There is no need to keep two almost similar images. This doesn't realistically give any educational value, because similar image with better light exists. (So it's out of scope.) --Kulmalukko (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy or project scope are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by a bit clearer image File:Tomb of Khan-i-Khana 930.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The details are better shown in the other picture. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by clearer image File:Tomb of Khan-i-Khana 927.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The other image is clearly better quality. So this worse image is out of scope, because it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:Bag-i-Alam Gumbad 11.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is out of scope. It does not give any realistically educational value to the collection, because similar image with clearly better quality exists. --Kulmalukko (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by File:Bag-i-Alam Gumbad 11.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too blurred. This is out of scope. According to the scope policy the file is not realistically educationally useful, if it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. So let's keep the better quality similar image and delete this blurred one. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by a bit clearer image File:Azim Khan Tomb 01.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a completly different image and this has the same clearity as the other image and we dont editorialize (read choose) on what images other projects use. Tm (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete According to the scope the file is not realistically educationally useful, if it add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. So this can be deleted and the other one kept. --Kulmalukko (talk) 16:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Your misreading the scope in the part that says "add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". As i´ve already said Wikimedia Commons doenst editorialize other projects and the "fact" that this image is "too similar" is purely your POV. Also Quoting a policy without making clear what part you are using to support your theory is not very usefull. Where in Deletion policy are basing your assumptions? This are two different and unblurred images, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment (I didn't quote the policy.) But if you need help, check the deletion policy. The policy says Note: if it is a work that is very similar (or identical) to another, but not an exact duplicate, it's a redundant file.. And then check the subsection Redundant/bad quality, which says Redundant or low quality files only get deleted on a case by case basis after they are listed at Commons:Deletion requests. At deletion requests you will need to provide reasons why a particular file is inferior to the alternative version. --Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment And you still havent provided the "reasons why a particular file is inferior to the alternative version". So please show them. Tm (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Non-free logo Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The same applies to
- I've advised the uploaded that they should go ahead and re-upload to en.wiki with the proper NFCC info. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I believe template:PD-textlogo applies here. —P. S. Burton (talk) 23:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't believe so. The Mount Sinai logo is clearly has a creative element and is therefore copyrightable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- No, that is without doubt incorrect. It consists entirely out of very simple geometrical shapes and text. —P. S. Burton (talk) 01:29, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 12:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
No es Veracruz sino Guantánamo. Wkboonec (talk) 05:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Moved the comment below from this page. Mathonius (talk) 07:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- No es Veracruz sino Guantánamo.
- ¿Vandalismo no detectado previamente?
- Ver esa misma imágen con su descripción correcta en
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_fleet_at_Guantanamo_Bay_1927.jpg
- --Wkboonec (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
There is Template:User en-admin, that is internationalized, with the iso code of the wiki. The use is the same because the "en" parameter is inserted. You can replace the template page with a redirect. Angelus(talk) 23:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Why the heck should we delete the older template and redirect it to your newer template that is less useful? The text in {{User en-admin}} is (German version)
Dieser Benutzer ist ein Administrator auf Englisch Wikipedia. (prüfen), whereas in {{User Wikipedia administrator}} it isDieser Benutzer ist ein Administrator in der Englischen Wikipedia (prüfen).The grammar of the former is just horrible. The same was true for the de version before I undid ANGELUS' edits. --Leyo 00:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC) - Comment - If it is grammatically incorrect, I withdraw my deletion request ... I thought it was well written. however, I corrected a bit it. --Angelus(talk) 00:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - However, even if it will not be deleted, this template should be moved to a page that refers to the English language, as it is written inside: "This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia". Exemple of new name: Template:User en-wiki admin
- Instead this template {{User Wikipedia admin}}, can be adapted to any edition of Wikipedia, with the insertion of the the iso code of the wiki, as first parameter. --Angelus(talk) 01:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- If no one is opposed to the rename of the template, after the end of the deletion request, if this template will not be deleted, I will proceed to rename. --Angelus(talk) 17:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Instead this template {{User Wikipedia admin}}, can be adapted to any edition of Wikipedia, with the insertion of the the iso code of the wiki, as first parameter. --Angelus(talk) 01:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Concerning “I corrected a bit it”: What does it help if it's less incorrect? --Leyo 18:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand yet, if the sentence is incorrect or the grammar is "just horrible" for you... --Angelus(talk) 19:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- If you want: “horribly incorrect”.
{{language|{{{1}}}|en}} Wikipedia,{{language|{{{1}}}|de}} Wikipedia,{{language|{{{1}}}|it}} Wikipedia, etc. as a link text simply does not work for German (and probably other languages, too). --Leyo 20:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)- Ok... so I withdraw my deletion request, I will proceed to the rename. --Angelus(talk) 22:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- If you want: “horribly incorrect”.
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Ya no es necesario esa imagen en mi cuenta, no cumple ni un rol. No aporta para mi y Wikipedia. Genzo! (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files appear to violate COM:FOP#United States.
Stefan4 (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Stefan4 (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC) Deleted: Derivative works of copyrighted work PierreSelim (talk) 05:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Derivative work of images on a screen.
Stefan4 (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept - As noted, the first the screen is PDTEXT, in the second it's just real-time. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC) See COM:PACKAGING. The Flickr user is unlikely the person who made the packaging. Stefan4 (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry 19:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC) No freedom of panorama in Russia. Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept as above. Yann (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC) The timetables might be considered as "databases" under the w:Database Directive. In that case, the timetables remain unfree until they are at least 15 years old.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Hedwig and others. Yann (talk) 06:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 2[edit]Derivative work of the aquarium's info boards. However it is conceivable that this is OK due to COM:FOP#Spain.
-mattbuck (Talk) 10:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC) Deleted: COM:DW. Alan (talk) 16:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 3[edit]Incomplete uploads. Please delete and/or reupload.
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 4[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ronhjones. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 5[edit]incomplete uploads - let the uploaders do them again
Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Deleted: Only Unfixed images deleted. --Ronhjones (Talk) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 6[edit]Files seem to have been accidentally uploaded as a .jpg instead of as a video
Elisfkc (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Mixed close. Deleted those where video was uploaded. Kept those which are essentially links to the original videos. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 7[edit]Screenshots of videos
-Killarnee (C•T•U) 13:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 8[edit]unused, useless screenshot of a video
-akko (talk) 12:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 9[edit]Useless screenshots of a video
-Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: concensus is to keep. Agree that these are in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_ليست_اللاعب_الدولي_السابق_عبيد_الدوسري_وﻻكنه_طالب_في_المرحله_الثانويه_(_نظام_مقررات_)_انسان_طب_2014-02-05_02-13.jpg){kind=link}
-เกิดวันที่_29_สิงหาคม_1986-มีพี่ฝาแฝด_ชื่อ_นางสาว_สุมณฑา_ธ_2014-02-05_11-53.jpg){kind=link}
![131 File:This is me 53 years old five 110 pounds height 5"1 2014-02-05 14-30.jpg](#File:This_is_me_53_years_old_five_110_pounds_height_5"1_2014-02-05_14-30.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Dreilaenderbruecke004.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%A8_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%82_%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%8A_%D9%88%EF%BB%BB%D9%83%D9%86%D9%87_%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8_%D9%81%D9%8A_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%87_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AB%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%87_(_%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%85_%D9%85%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA_)_%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%B7%D8%A8_2014-02-05_02-13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%A8_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%82_%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%8A_%D9%88%EF%BB%BB%D9%83%D9%86%D9%87_%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8_%D9%81%D9%8A_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%87_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AB%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%87_(_%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%85_%D9%85%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA_)_%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%B7%D8%A8_2014-02-05_02-13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88_29_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A1_1986-%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%9D%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%9D%E0%B8%94_%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD_%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A7_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%91%E0%B8%B2_%E0%B8%98_2014-02-05_11-53.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88_29_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A1_1986-%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%9D%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%9D%E0%B8%94_%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD_%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A7_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%91%E0%B8%B2_%E0%B8%98_2014-02-05_11-53.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![21:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/02/06#c-Indeedous-2014-02-06T21:10:00.000Z-File:This_is_me_53_years_old_five_110_pounds_height_5"1_2014-02-05_14-30.jpg){kind=link}
![22:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/02/06#c-Avraham-2014-02-13T22:03:00.000Z-File:This_is_me_53_years_old_five_110_pounds_height_5"1_2014-02-05_14-30.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rade_et_environs_de_Brest.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Provinces_maritimes_de_France.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(39097253295).jpg){kind=link}
_(28216254809).jpg){kind=link}
_(39097256505).jpg){kind=link}
_(39097260125).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Dark_Grass_Blue_(Female)_(41920030290).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5286278649).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6146174256).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(11197630903).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_White_Smiley_Wink_on_Black_(3386235660).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_White_Smiley_Wink_in_%22Black_Smoke%22_(3386231596).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Black_Smiley_Wink_in_%22White_Fog%22_(3385415445).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Green_Smiley_Wink_with_Red_reverse._(3386221428).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Smiley_Wink_with_Multicolour_Illumination_and_Shadows_(3385403397).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Monochrome_3D_Anaglyph_Smiley_Wink_with_Multiple_Illumination_Sources_and_Shadows_(3386200666).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Colour_3D_Anaglyph_Smiley_Wink_with_Multicolour_Illumination_and_Shadows_(3386193198).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 10
[edit]Derivative works of copyrighted logos.
- File:Escut - Diada d'Aniversari dels Castellers de Lleida, 2016 (retallat).jpg
- File:Escut Castellers de l'Alt Maresme - Festes de Maig de Badalona, 2017 (retallat).jpg
- File:Escut - Diada d'Aniversari dels Castellers de Lleida, 2016.jpg
- File:Escut Castellers de l'Alt Maresme - Festes de Maig de Badalona, 2017.jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I added the intermediate works File:Escut - Diada d'Aniversari dels Castellers de Lleida, 2016.jpg and File:Escut Castellers de l'Alt Maresme - Festes de Maig de Badalona, 2017.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 22:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: SVG is no valid reason for deletion ChristianBier (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Nonsense, I nominate these by the dozen every week and they are always deleted. This is an unused scaled-down duplicate with no use and a superior scalable SVG version. Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, by ChristianBier. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Brazil.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, only 22×15 pixels. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daemon2010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]This user has uploaded some files, which need OTRS tickets from different copyright holders
File:Nasacken wappen.jpgFile:BigNasackinWappen.jpgerror, sorry 91.65.69.93 10:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)- File:FamilySpace-screen.png
- File:Plytka ceramiczna.jpg
- File:Fragm tumby.jpg
- File:Tumba nagrobna.jpg
- File:Eas gerb.jpg
- File:Eas prazdn.jpg
- File:Eas president.jpg
- File:Tg 10.jpg
- File:SAUIT45.jpg
- File:T150ph4.jpg
91.65.69.93 10:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Я думаю, что можно удалить вот эти:
Первое больше не нужно, т.к. была удалена статья, для которой загружалось изображение. 2,3,4 могут иметь проблемы с лицензией и их тоже следует удалить. Остальные удалять недопустимо, особенно:
У них явно истек срок защиты авторского права. --Daemon2010 (talk) 11:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that any of not-crossed images are free. The date 1931 is not enough.
Нет утверждении, что какое-нибудь изображение из непрочеркнутых действительно свободное. Год 1931 этого не покажет, потому что автор вполне мог прожить 15 лет ещё и в том случае изображение защищено авторскими правами. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daemon2010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious licensing, no indication why these are in public domain.
- File:Image 4dc5190d983ca-670x477.jpg
- File:Image4dc1a4b5a3763-777x536.jpg
- File:A-44005.jpg
- File:Kv4 3.jpg
- File:231210 kv4 09.jpg
- File:231210 kv4 10.jpg
- File:231210 kv4 08.gif
- File:231210 kv4 07.gif
- File:231210 kv4 02.gif
- File:231210 kv4 01.gif
- File:Kv4ch4.jpg
- File:Kv4ch1.jpg
- File:Kv4ch6.jpg
- File:Kv4ch5.jpg
- File:Kv4ch3.jpg
VLu (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Jujutacular T · C 04:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Eusebius (talk) 06:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - privy.--E8 (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Ya no es necesario esa imagen en mi cuenta, no cumple ni un rol. No hace niun aporte para Wikipedia Genzo! (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The architect, Tony Garnier, die in 1948. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, this image is a copyvio. L'architecte, Tony Garnier, est décédé en 1948. Comme il n'existe pas de liberté de panorama en France, cette image constitue une atteinte au droit d'auteur. Miniwark (talk) 23:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
If you look in the wikicommons page of the Centre Pompidou some pictures have a warning, other do not. I suspect because the ones without warnings show "pieces", not the whole buildings. Well, you do not see the whole villa there (and in the related 5 rue de la Mignonne file), just the wall on the road. From that image you hardly understand how "original" is the work... the law is ambiguous, as far as I know, so in many case in principle the reason why the images are (correctly) removed should be more "precaution" than real "violation" (right?) In any case, how many times in france "copyvio" has been proved for the use of images of buildings? The absence of freedom of panorama is the consequence of a specific law or of a "hole" in the legislation? In the second scenario, I could understand a deletion if Garnier had died only 10 years ago, but when you are (quite) close to the natural copyright limit (1948 + 70 = 2018, right?) the logical thing more than deletion could be to leave the file there with a precise warning, so the people that can use (in US for example, right?), use it, the other ones at least know how much they should wait. It is similar to what i read once in an old photograph caption.
- Keep I agree with the comments of the author: why shouldn't people be left to use the image in countries where it is completely legal, such as the US? Alecobbe (talk) 16:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep and why you did not ask for deletion two other photos about the same villa? why just mine? I think I will start soon to upload the other photos of the villas in rue de la Mignonne I have. alexmar983 (talk) 00:57, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep in my very humble opinion this building, despite the Tony Garnier signature, doesn't reach the threshold of originality, it's a simple villa... We can notice that some pictures of Le Corbusier "Cité Radieuse" have been kept because it's just a flat building. Jeriby (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Just to know, where is my other file (the villa at 5, rue de la Mignonne)? It seems it has been deleted, although the two photos of the villas were uploaded and nominated for deletion at the same time. I think i will re-upload that as well, and i will create as soon i have free time a new page on French wikipedia that uses all these images. That file had a good and complete caption that could have been used as a starting point, too bad... alexmar983 (talk) 02:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Architect Tony Garnier died in 1948. No FoP in France. Aga (d) 11:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Same as I said in the previous DR, in my very humble opinion this building, despite the Tony Garnier signature, doesn't reach the threshold of originality, it's a simple villa... We can notice that some pictures of Le Corbusier "Cité Radieuse" have been kept because it's just a flat building. Jeriby (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, even simple villas surpass usually threshold of originality. Even if they are flat buildings. Undeleted in 2019. Taivo (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is unlikely to be the work of IMF staff, since a full resolution, uncropped version of this very same image shows up in an unrelated website. Underlying lk (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Info Türkçe: bağlantı şeklinde kaynak verilirse sorun çözülebilir- Lubunya 13:51, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Interwiki links are now provided by Wikidata and shouldn't be added locally anymore. This is currently used for Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Category. Mathonius (talk) 07:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- It should, be Wikidata isn't operational yet. Besides, not everybody editing Commons can edit Wikidata. Thus one still needs to add them locally. -- Docu at 07:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: interwiki links are provided by wikidata, which is up and running just fine. If it can be shown that this is not the case, we can restore this page FASTILY 08:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)