Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/12/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![6 File:Schwäbisch Hall, Rathaus, Deckengemälde im Stättmeistersaal "Allegorie der Stadt Hall und ihres Wohlstandes" (Gesamtbild).jpg](#File:Schwäbisch_Hall,_Rathaus,_Deckengemälde_im_Stättmeistersaal_"Allegorie_der_Stadt_Hall_und_ihres_Wohlstandes"_(Gesamtbild).jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
its false and spam someone has used my photo and created this.. please delete this197.224.109.164 14:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete It's a evident spam and copyvio of http://edu.gov.mu/ba/LogosAndImages/Enews2/ACORRECTEDFRAMESETTOP.htm. — ♫♫ Leitoxx 
The Police ♪♪ — 17:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
this is my photo.and an abuse..this needs to be deleted as soon as possible.. Juddoo khemalakshmi (talk) 18:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry because of copyight violation JuTa 20:18, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Per out of scope — ♫♫ Leitoxx 
The Police ♪♪ — 03:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Why this should be out of scope? It's a copyvio - but in scope. Marcus Cyron (talk) 03:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant copyright violation Tabercil (talk) 03:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Promocional. Violación derechos de autor (personas vivas) out of scope. — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 03:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant copyvio - image is from Getty Tabercil (talk) 03:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, poor quality image of no informational value Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: and probably a personal rights issue Jcb (talk) 11:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was uploaded as part of an attack against a minor for the WP article "Retarded Rex". I am unsure as to how to speedy it on WC. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: For speedy you can also use {{Speedy}} Jcb (talk) 00:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Schwäbisch Hall, Rathaus, Deckengemälde im Stättmeistersaal "Allegorie der Stadt Hall und ihres Wohlstandes" (Gesamtbild).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Foto von um 1969 mit dreidimensionalen, geschmückten Rahmenteilen; Fotograf wird nicht genannt, ist jedoch wohl noch nicht 70 Jahre tot. 88.215.65.144 06:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry Jcb (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Can only be described as vandalism. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 21:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Dschwen Jcb (talk) 00:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Can only be described as vandalism. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 21:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Dschwen Jcb (talk) 00:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Strange laughter at the beginning of each paragraph (at 9 seconds, 1 min. 42 sec., et cetera.) Kattenkruid (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: wrong procedure (per long standing NL community consensus), use nl:Portaal:Gesproken Wikipedia/Update gewenst if you think there is really a need to replace the recording. Jcb (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Hopelessly meaningless. What are all those various-shades-of-gray boxes?? And appears to be a direct gray-scale conversion of the PubChem-display rendering (bad-faith uploader claim of "own work", and possible license violation). DMacks (talk) 02:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, I took a magnifying glass and tried to read the file ... could not. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
superlous cropped version, orphan Leif Czerny (talk) 10:49, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted, better version is File:Franz Brentano.jpeg, also author's request. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
it's not appropriate JustinaMMM (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, it is totally appropriate, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: It is a bad montage — the pasted head doesnt match the brightness and contrast ranges of the body, not to mention mismatching anatomy. But it could be kept as an example of common mistakes. However, since the uploader requests (this time only once, just by duplication the original nomination, instead of seconding it…), it can be safely deleted. Such bad montages are easy to recreat at need. -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, per Tuválkin. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope,redundant,illegal Achinsagar (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: While in this context «illegal» is vague and «redundant» is meaningless, let me add to this litany that this is also a crappy montage that ruined what seems to have been a nice portrait to start with, and that it was uploaded 10 day s ago by the same person who is now filing a deletion request in such ponderous tones, and who clogged in troll-like fashion the file page with 66 instances of the DR warning tag. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, per Tuválkin. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Achinsagar (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment: If that’s so, why did you upload it in the first place? And why is there 21 deletion request tags on the page? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)- Delete out of scope. — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 23:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
reason=unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope,redundant,illegal Achinsagar (talk) 18:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo, no educational use Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, potential attack photo (look file name), I will better speedy delete it. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carolinebn8 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: this map is not accurate Yann (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - I have no idea if it's accurate or not, but I can tell it's taken from a third party site without proof of permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Magog. Yann (talk) 06:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Useless PNG version of File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg. Stefan4 (talk) 13:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: yep. JuTa 23:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect. Image is gray-scale conversion from diagram at PubChem (contradicts "own work" claim of uploader), which is such low resolution that the triple-bond in the lower-left end of the chain only appears as double (systematic name and enlarged view on PubChem are consistent with triple) DMacks (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unusable. --Leyo 11:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Ed (Edgar181) 12:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and now replaced. --Yikrazuul (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, yes, the triple bond was not readable. Now, when the file is replaced, I can delete it. Taivo (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stefan4 as no license (no license), see talkpage Ezarateesteban 20:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- There it says that this is the logo for the uploader's workplace. There is however no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. This needs OTRS and a copyright tag. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: anyhow: no license at all. JuTa 23:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
el autor no desea su publicacion Aquiles boy (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, author's request. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
el autor no desea Aquiles boy (talk) 22:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader requested deletion of unused file. Also, the file is .pdf and pure text, so out of scope. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Posible archivo sujeto a derechos de autor 181.126.212.76 22:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, album cover, source and author are itunes.com. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Daily low quality (lowest this time) penis spam. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as a derivative work of that album cover! -mattbuck (Talk) 00:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, give us this day our daily penises ... Taivo (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be out of project scope? Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 00:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep: In scope. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)- Keep: Obviously in scope. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Would you please come up with a argument about the encyclopedic use except gallery?
- Is the license veryfied?
- --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 15:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- To counter your unbased claimed that this image is not in scope it is sufficient to claim that it is, in the same unsourced manner.
- If the licensing, copyright status, or permissions for use of this image are the matter why didn’t you add that rationale to the DR?
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: I may be bias as the uploader / bot operator. But there is a substantial list of photos by the author on commons that are useable to illustrate different photographic techniques, which suggests to me that it's in scope. And as far as Flickr Upload Bot is concerned the license is valid. Nicoli Maege (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- What photographic technique is this? --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 16:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well now that you mention it this particular image could be considered an example of Low-key lighting Nicoli Maege (talk)
- What photographic technique is this? --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 16:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for giving it reasons and categories. If everything is ok, we'll keep it. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 17:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept, apparently the request is withdrawn. I checked the mentioned category and there can be find much worse photos. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 00:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: In scope. Also, the model shows an abdominal scar — something so far we seem to have not a lot. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Appears to be in scope. Nicoli Maege (talk) 18:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept, quality is satisfactory and abdominal scar distinguishes the photo from usual porn. Would be even better to know, where the scar origines from. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:IDENT. There is no assertion from the photographer that consent for broad publication was given. The Flickr account has been deactivated, so there is no way to follow up with the photographer. Pete F (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as nominated. This combined with the clear identifiability makes this an obvious delete. Proposing under the wrong rationale shouldn't inhibit catching IDENT problems. --SJ+ 21:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, per nom. whym (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
MIssing encyclopedic value. Hans Haase (talk, express talk) 00:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Good illustration of amateur, informal, maybe even improvised pornography (i.e., the creation of sexually arousing images — there’s a guy with a video camera here, focus, ppl!), of which we have so far many examples of its result but really scarce documentation on its methodology. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:16, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: I think it's in scope because it documents a notable social phenomena. Nicoli Maege (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept, the photo shows well, in which conditions amateur porn is made. Big encyclopedical value. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File is not in use. And it seems that someone just wanted to see how mobile uploader works. Wertuose (talk) 06:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused photo about non-notable person, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 20:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, text only. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no description + no categories = useless for commons . 91.66.153.214 09:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Hello anon IP, feel free to add categories and to the description. I believe this is a humming bird feeder, and this is one of two photographs on Commons showing humming bird feeders. See scope. --Fæ (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks and Keep 91.66.153.214 10:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks and
Kept, I have never seen such birdfeeder, so this has encyclopedical value and is in scope. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: advertisement. Potential copyvio. Stefan4 (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, please do not advertize in Wikipedia. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Not own work. Painting possibly old but unsourced. Stefan4 (talk) 13:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your alert. I posted this image as a reference to the book. In this book, references allow the reader to understand better the main subject: "Château de Bois-Briand". Because I am not used to Wikipedia rules I volunteer to delete this image if it does not fit with the regulations.
--Eric Delalonde (talk) 11:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC) Eric Delalonde
Deleted, probably the image (book cover) is not OK. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, original at http://www.airliners.net/photo/Canada---Air/EHI-CH-149-Cormorant/2084874/&sid=d661afeb5758f88761ecc73e6b9b5f78 with copyright notice 86.28.97.168 15:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be removed from photographers account. FOX 52 (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader agrees to delete, so there is actually no other possibilities than deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The photo appears likely to have been taken in a private place; there is no assertion that the subject consented to broad publication, as per COM:IDENT. Pete F (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Such consent is not needed, because nothing strange or shameful happens on photo. But the photo has real problem: the photographer Daniel Stuckey and uploader user Ersake are probably different persons and photographer's permission is missing. This is small photo with no metadata, so copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment COM:IDENT has nothing to do with shame or strangeness, it discusses expectations of privacy. So your vote is based on your opinion, not articulated principles. However, since the uploader has asked for help, I will try to work with him to resolve all issues. -Pete F (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
How can the photographer provide consent for the picture?
- Update: Per my discussion with the uploader on his talk page, I no longer believe this file should be deleted. The photographer is expected to send an email to OTRS that should take care of both copyright and personality rights issues. -Pete F (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept -- I am withdrawing my nomination per the OTRS ticket which was submitted (2013121710002384), addressing both copyright and personality rights questions. -Pete F (talk) 20:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot of a copyrighted video. Nicoli Maege (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion all other uploads from the same user:
- File:Avril-lavigne-3-650-430.jpg
- File:Avril-lavigne-rock-n-roll-3-650-430.jpg Taivo (talk) 13:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete (for the additions) I agree, all seem to be screencaps of copyrighted material. Nicoli Maege (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, group of non-notable people Taivo (talk) 11:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the user's last remaining upload Taivo (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 05:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 16:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It is used in en.wiki, so apparently it is in scope. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. Érico Wouters msg 02:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused user portrait 91.66.153.214 11:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 16:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion scaled-down copy File:Philippe giffard.jpg. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Austria doesn't cover text. Stefan4 (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, behalten, der Text hat keinen schöpferischen Wert. --Kürschner (talk) 21:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:TOO#Austria: the Austrian threshold of originality is very low. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Stefan4: in regard to copyright, an inscription is quite different from a graphic work, such as a logo. This inscription does contain merely facts, it's a not a poem or alike. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- See this case: according to the European Court of Justice, there are some texts as short as 11 words which meet the threshold of originality for literature. Also, the European Court of Justice holds jurisdiction over Austria (as well as the rest of the European Union), so that case is relevant here. This is creative for example because the author chose which facts to include. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Stefan4: in regard to copyright, an inscription is quite different from a graphic work, such as a logo. This inscription does contain merely facts, it's a not a poem or alike. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:TOO#Austria: the Austrian threshold of originality is very low. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Wenn ihr dieses Bild löscht, dann könnt ihr alle Gedenktafeln und sonstige Inschriften löschen. Übertreibt ihr es nicht ein wenig sehr???? --GuentherZ (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Locker nehmen Günther, die Römer die spinnen .... -- Bwag (talk) 23:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Hallo! Ich nehm´s locker. Was glaubst du, was ich da wirklich gerne schreiben würde? ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- keep, the deletion request is nonsense. -jkb- (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the deletion request is nonsense. This is a simply info table, not more, not less. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the deletion request is nonsense. --Bobo11 (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep die spinnen die Römer. Aber sind sie überhaupt bis Schweden gekommen? Scheinbar ja. Der LA ist Nonsens. --Ralf Roleček 19:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Simple data (birth date, career data) are not copyright protected. IMHO, the combining text snippets like was, began etc. do not show enough creativity (threshold of originality) to copyright protect this text. --Martina talk 19:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep According to what I understand of § 54 Abs. 1 Z 5 UrhG, Austrian FOP indeed DOES cover text. Yellowcard (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Wo liest du das? (Wobei ich durchaus bezweifle dass die konkrete Inschrift irgendeine Schöpfungshöhe hat.) --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ich kann aus der angegebenen Quelle allerdings auch nichts entnehmen, was diese Abbildung als Urheberrechtsverletzung einstufen könnte? --Kürschner (talk) 20:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Gegenstand sind Werke der Bildenden Künste, zu den Bildenden Künsten können durchaus auch Elemente, die Text enthalten (z.B. Bildhauereien, Grabsteine), gehören. de:Panoramafreiheit#Österreich weist z.B. File:Wien Strudlhofstiege Doderer.jpg als Beispiel für österreichische Panoramafreiheit aus – das Gedicht wäre sonst noch geschützt (bis zum 1.1.2037). Gruß Yellowcard (talk) 22:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ich kann aus der angegebenen Quelle allerdings auch nichts entnehmen, was diese Abbildung als Urheberrechtsverletzung einstufen könnte? --Kürschner (talk) 20:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Wo liest du das? (Wobei ich durchaus bezweifle dass die konkrete Inschrift irgendeine Schöpfungshöhe hat.) --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Scherzantrag, Zeitdiebstahl, sonst nichts. --ST ○ 20:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Völlig unsinniger Löschantrag, eigentlich eine Zumutung. --Gugerell (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Besides FoP, which is held up in Austria for all permanent installed objects in the public space, there is not even a copyright holder who could be adressed for sampling together these facts and having "chosen which facts to include about Max Steiner" on the small tablet. The requester of the deletion argues that "the Austrian threshold of originality is very low". Ideed it is not, generally. But he cites some cases, concerning trademarks and use of these trademarks by competing companies. This is really time wasting, because they have nothing to do with a memorial tablet in a public area. --Regiomontanus (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep } the deletion request is nonsense, thresholf od originality not met. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 21:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Then why do you think that the European Court of Justice decided that 11 words sometimes is sufficient for copyright protection? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Because 11 words can ideed meet the threshold of originality; however, not every 11-words-sentence does so. It's been an individual case not to be transferred to this case where the ToO for sure is not met. And a personal sentence to Stefan4: Please start to understand court decisions before you request so many senseless deletions. This is meant in a friendly manner. Yellowcard (talk) 11:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Then why do you think that the European Court of Justice decided that 11 words sometimes is sufficient for copyright protection? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Standard schema text. Below ToO. Dschwen (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused photo about non-notable person Taivo (talk) 11:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Yasser1963
[edit]User Yasser1963 uploaded these images:
- File:Smiley-face-and-heart-15299-svg.svg
- File:Two-Story-Bed-15592-svg.svg
- File:Strange-Simple-Eyes-15585-svg.svg
- File:Strange-Eyes-with-smiley-face-15586-svg.svg
- File:Strange-Eyes-with-suprised-face-15587-svg.svg
- File:Sketchy-eyes-15588-svg.svg
- File:Boxer-Short-15584-svg.svg
- File:Sweater-Jacket-Line-Art-15582-svg.svg
- File:Lineart-Single-Sport-Shoes-15581-svg.svg
- File:Single-Sport-Shoe-Colored-15580-svg.svg
- File:Boxer-Short-line-art-15579-svg.svg
- File:Formal-Male-Suit-Colored-Pants-Tie-15578-svg.svg
- File:Formal-Male-Shoe-Colored-15577-svg.svg
- File:Lineart-Male-Shoe-15576-svg.svg
- File:Sweater-Jacket-Grey-15575-svg.svg
They are all unused drawings from non-notable artist. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: At least the boxer short is a copy vio. The remaining doodles go per COM:SCOPE. Dschwen (talk) 22:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gr33nzpoint (talk · contribs)
[edit]It's not a free licensig. per out of scope
— ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 03:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant Copyright violations Tabercil (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2024 (95 years after publication). JuTa 00:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2027 (95 years after publication). JuTa 00:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio. Downloaded from here and uploaded under free license. No indication that the uploader had permission to upload the image from the law firm and no OTRS ticket pending. –Fredddie™ 00:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Derivative material -- likely copyright violation. Levdr1lp / talk 02:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Promocional o conflicto de interés. — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 02:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It is in an English speaking country, so there is almost certainly no FOP . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
License violation/misattribution of source. Claimed own-work, but appears to be copied from http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2013/12/crowdsourcing-delivers-promising-anticancer-fungi-compound (note use of nonstandard formatting/inconsistent with style/format of others that editor claims are his. DMacks (talk) 04:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- The problem is the poor quality, including {{BadJPG}}. It is, however, in use. --Leyo 09:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It almost certainly is copied from the source noted above. I have replaced the image with File:Maximiscin.svg to address the quality issues, so File:Maximiscin.jpg is now unused. (Quality issues aside, since it is a simply a depiction of a chemical structure, wouldn't changing the license to {{PD-chem}} and correcting the source have been appropriate, instead of nominating for deletion?) Ed (Edgar181) 12:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, clearly. Since there is now a better replacement, Delete. --Leyo 13:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, clearly. Since there is now a better replacement,
- That may well be. I've run out of patience with this user's history of false claims as own and poor-to-useless quality issues. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Understood. Ed (Edgar181) 12:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- False claims are a reason to block the user. He has been warned. --Leyo 11:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- That may well be. I've run out of patience with this user's history of false claims as own and poor-to-useless quality issues. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Personal, unused photo. Out of project scope. 레비Revi 05:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
As of this request, this is a personal image that is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, dubious license. Sealle (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep it's likely PD, considering its age and its subject's age. And it's in use. While the uploader may have mistakenly used a too-restrictive license, that's not a reason for deletion. --SJ+ 04:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Subject died in 1932. I normally use 1885 as the cutoff date for assuming that the creator has been dead for 70 years -- this is very much too late for that. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
File is taken from Facebook, no permission 91.66.153.214 11:06, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a photo from a photo 91.66.153.214 11:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes, behind glass in a museum? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Small photo with no metadata. This is not own work as claimed, because uploader is on photo playing drums and this is not a selfie. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
artist is unknown, not pre-1937 as uploader claims, surely post-2000 painting Taivo (talk) 11:23, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
derivate work of photo of Gerassim Ivanov, the photo is not de minimis, although cross and nameplate does not surpass threshold of originality Taivo (talk) 11:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Какое такое "derivate" фото? Это фото сделано лично мной, с моего смартфона. На нём изображёно могильное надгробие и ничего более. В чём ваши претензии, господа? --Zboris (talk) 19:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- На этом фотографии изображено другая фотография. Я верю, что всё остальное ваша фотография, но мне кажется, что вы не автор фотографии Герасима Иванова, которая находится на земле. Нужно разрешение фотографа той фотографии. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a scan, and not "own work" as claimed. Even if the illustration is indeed the own work of the uploader, they are unlikely to be the copyright holder (author or publisher of a book normally takes the copyright). This, that and the other (talk) 11:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Somewhat unlikely own work by uploader, as an uncropped version of this image was published already in 2008 at http://thalifeofliz.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/carmine20pi41.jpg. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
http://www.concertlive.fr/sites/default/files/imagecache/diaporama_full/contenus/453928/weekend_des_curiosites_2013_affiche.jpg 109.18.4.200 13:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The layout and labels look very similar to LG's own product images (like this one), so it is likely that this is an official product image from LG. Stefan4 (talk) 14:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. What do you think, is it out of scope? Maybe this even violates copyright of shirt designer? Taivo (talk) 15:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: THe shirt is PD-text, but it is certainly out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in Ethiopia and this is a modern building Taivo (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
small photo about notable people with no metadata, the user's only other upload is proven copyvio, so probably this is also Taivo (talk) 16:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
1966 Warner copyright on uncropped front at lower right. We hope (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- it weird I don't know why I didn't notice that when I uploaded it. I guess we have to delete it unless someone can come up with an excuse to keep it but I don't think we will be able too. Dman41689 (talk) 06:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Now are uploader's all contributions presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination -Pete F (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The logo is clearly copyrighted -see page http://www.fanfare-overmere.be/ MoiraMoira (talk) 17:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - {{PD-textlogo}} obviously applies - Jcb (talk) 17:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Jcb Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Pictures on every books covers were done by photographers who probably never gave their agreements for this kind of use with that free licence. OTRS was only related to the agreement of the author of these books. Stefan4 (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Did you confirm with OTRS that this indeed is the case? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- No it's just an assumption: I don't know how to access the related OTRS folder. I know there is a ticket OTRS (template) and that this ticket was done by the author of books. --Aga (d) 18:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- This ticket was done by the author of the file, who is also the author of the books. I save this file as "own work" because it is. OTRS ask me authorization of some editors and I sent them while covers of book are perhaps "public domain" ? I don't understand Agamitsudo's motivation. Sorry for my very poor English.--Claude PIARD (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- No it's just an assumption: I don't know how to access the related OTRS folder. I know there is a ticket OTRS (template) and that this ticket was done by the author of books. --Aga (d) 18:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The OTRS ticket covers only the image. It says nothing about the covers of the books. I think the nom is correct -- the photographs on the covers were probably licensed for use on the book cover and M. Piard does not have the right to freely license them here. In order to keep this, we would need a license from each of the photograpers whose work appears on the covers. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
I assume that this page is from here which has a copyright notice and does not appear to be freely licensable. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
From Camcanary: I think you're right actually. But how do I delete it? Sorry I'm new to Wikimedia Commons and it's not entirely clear how to delete it. 15/12/13
From Camcanary: {{no permission since}} 16/12/13
Deleted: Only elected Administrators can delete things from Commons, which is what the DR process is all about. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial this is a copyright violation. Nicoli Maege (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 19:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that the copyright has expired in Scotland. Stefan4 (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The source of the plan is given as a 1994 publication by the National Trust, meaning the publisher or the person who drew the plan for that publication holds the copyright. As it dates from 1994 and teh period of copyright in the UK (the country of origin) is life plus 70 years the plan is not in the public domain. There is no indication that the National Trust or the authors released the image under a free licence. Nev1 (talk) 19:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Agree. It was produced by the architects Stuart Page for the NT, and I can see no evidence of either authorising its release. While I've known architects occasionally do so, I've never heard of the NT agreeing to such a release. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Also affected: File:Sufiyana Kathak by Manisha Gulyani.JPG
Uploaded among batch of blatant copyvios with similar subject matter (see uploader talk/deleted contribs). See, for example, File:Manisha Gulyani.jpg, an image of the same woman claiming self-authorship but with watermark and copyright info in camera EXIF data. Similar technical characteristics to images here. Эlcobbola talk 20:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Image appeared here in June 2013 (© Copyright St. Mary's.) Uploaded to Commons September 2013. Would need OTRS permission from St. Mary's. Эlcobbola talk 21:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata, all other user uploads (and there are many) are copyvios - see talk/deleted contribs. DUCK copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 21:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per uploaders own statement: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License", which is not compatible with Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Wouldn't an advertisement be copyrighted in Bulgaria? Yann (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
If I remember correctly, the image on this shirt was subject of a legal battle, as the underlying Obama portrait had been shot by an agency photographer. Therefore, the image of the t-shirt is a derivative of that photo and should be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Your memory is correct, but that suit was settled. This is, however, a DW of the poster created from the photo. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.54 22:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.55 22:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.54 22:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.55 22:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.54 22:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.55 22:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 23:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 18:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per out of scope — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 03:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Now the file is used in es.wiki and so automatically in scope, but ... quality is bad, so let's wait the week and then look, is it still used. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 16:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Now it is used on ml.wiki on user page. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Through curtain you cannot make a good photo. Too bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: The actual purpose of this picture is to show the holly flag which you have stated as curtain found in the Namobuddha monastery since the flag was so thin that the other side of the flag is also visible. Its not the image actually taken something through curtain. --Shiva Khanal (Talk) 08:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leitoxx as Fair use (Fair use) Stefan4 (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Simple logo, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple. - Fma12 (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leitoxx as Fair use (Fair use) Stefan4 (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple, PD-textlogo. - Fma12 (talk) 17:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.54 22:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
no FOP in UAE/Abu Dhabi 217.92.129.54 22:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leitoxx as Fair use (Fair use) Stefan4 (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Simple. - Fma12 (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo, these drops (or how to name them) have no simple shape. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as there are doubts it is not PDS-trivial Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Keralakathakali
[edit]Here are both files, uploaded by user Keralakathakali and not yet presented for deletion:
They are not big photos and they have no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:MrCholand
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by User MrCholand and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Chinska-Republika-Ludowa-Podzial-Administracyjny-PL.png
- File:Chiny - Demografia.png
- File:Happy-Planet-Index-Map-2013-PL.png
- File:Mapa-Administracyjna-Chinskiej-Republiki-Ludowej.png
- File:Misje-Apollo.png
- File:Moon Exploration PL.png
- File:PKB (GDP) per capita (2011) PL.png
- File:PKB-per-capita-2011-PL.jpg
- File:PKB-per-capita-2012-PL.png
- File:PKB-per-capita-2011-PL-450px.png
- File:Program-Apollo.png
- File:Temperamenty-PL.png
_per_capita_(2011)_PL.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
They are watermarked "NewTimes.pl". OTRS-permission from NewTimes is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Oleg K
[edit]User Олег К has uploaded these photos (in parentheses creation year of depicted work):
- File:Artjom kamen.JPG (1987)
- File:Artjom sam.JPG (1987)
- File:Chernobil lik kh.JPG (1999)
- File:Chernobil lik kh big.JPG (1999)
- File:Degprom.JPG (modern architecture)
- File:Degprom large.jpg (modern architecture)
- File:Degprom panoram.jpg (modern architecture)
- File:Dohka.JPG (after 1958)
- File:Filarmony kh.JPG (stalinist architecture)
- File:Khrest golodomor.JPG (1989)
- File:Khrest golodomor table.JPG (1989)
- File:Kohovij.JPG (after WWII, circa 1968?)
- File:Makarenko kh fed.JPG (after 1939, probably after WWII)
- File:Makarenko kh fed 2.JPG (after 1939, probably after WWII)
- File:Motrocov.JPG (after WWII, circa 1968?)
- File:Mynajlenko.JPG (after WWII, circa 1968?)
- File:Nikityna.JPG (1968)
- File:Ostrovski.JPG (person died 1936, by style after WWII monument, sculptor Ya. I. Zhukovskaya)
- File:Rudnev1.JPG (1959)
- File:Rudnev Kharkiv Rudneva sq.JPG (1959)
- File:Shumilov na motr.JPG (I guess after WWII)
- File:Shumilov na motr big.JPG (I guess after WWII)
- File:Skrypnyk kh.JPG (1969)
- File:Skrypnyk kh big.JPG (1969)
- File:Zoja.jpg (after WWII, circa 1968?)
- File:Zubarjov.JPG (after WWII, circa 1968?)
- File:Ubijvovk.JPG (after WWII, circa 1968?)
These are apparently all modern sculptures and houses, but there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:我路・幌内画像倉庫
[edit]User 我路・幌内画像倉庫 uploaded these photos:
There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for sculptures. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moonsun1981 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Avaz & Selcan best friends in Quba (e-citizen Az).JPG
- File:Avaz & Selcan best friends, (e-citizen).JPG
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Ray Garraty (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
This is my own work. This is my son and my sister's daughter pictures--Moonsun1981 (talk) 19:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- What Commons is not. (1.4 Commons is not a social network). --Ray Garraty (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: These are two of the few items within Category:Children of Azerbaijan where the depicted children look neither squalid, nor unhappy, nor stricken by an unkind fate. I think we need more of these. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- All squalid children fell into this category for mistakes. They are of Iranian Azerbaijan. I cleaned category.--Ray Garraty (talk) 02:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Ray Garraty yes, Commons is not a social network. But this is not the case. These are two of the few items within Category:Children of Azerbaijan... Per above Tuválkin. --►Cekli829 15:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- where you can use these photos?--Ray Garraty (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Should a definitely use? For example, the article Tourism in Azerbaijan and etc. --►Cekli829 13:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is't a serious conversation. I see no reason to keep these photos in commons.--Ray Garraty (talk) 14:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, you said it before. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:52, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is't a serious conversation. I see no reason to keep these photos in commons.--Ray Garraty (talk) 14:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Should a definitely use? For example, the article Tourism in Azerbaijan and etc. --►Cekli829 13:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Our only decent, modern photos of regular Azerbaijani "tween" children not engaged in a specific activity. This, that and the other (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus. INeverCry 18:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scooby123x (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos, not uploader's own work (all other user uploads are copyvios - see talk/deleted contribs). Discussion needed as to whether PD-textlogo would apply.
Эlcobbola talk 21:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This user uploaded unfree files after ЭlCobbola's warning, so I blocked Scooby123x indefinitely. And here are his latest uploads, small photos with no metadata:
- File:Cahill Printers, as of June 2009.PNG (source: Google Street View, author: Google)
- File:Fire raging on 28th May 2007.jpg (source: rte.ie, author: Raidio Telifis Eireann) Taivo (talk) 12:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Solver55
[edit]These photos are uploaded by user Solver55:
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia. In addition, they are small photos with no metadata, so they can be copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sonkarupdates
[edit]These files are uploaded by user Sonkarupdates:
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar addressing speech in a ferocious manner to people.jpg
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar delivering speech in Bareilly.jpg
- File:Photo0297Shri Kalicharan Sonkar delivering speech in Bareilly.jpg
They depict copyrighted banner. Also, elections are coming and this is election propaganda of a politician. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- delete, and also:
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar greeted by a student.jpg
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar being greeted by people.jpg
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar with his personal assistance Mr. Israr Ullah Sidikki.jpg
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar in Party Workers Meet in Bareilly Uttar Pradesh.jpg
- File:Shri Kalicharan Sonkar on stage with other Members of Indian Justice Party.jpg
St1995 12:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
now, that flag is only a PNG of the new svg file. We do not need that duplicate Antemister (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The file is used 564 times in multiple wikis. Some bot must replace all uses, otherways I do not support deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Png versions of svg files are valid, some of our wikis prefer them. Png->svg bot replacements are forbidden to prevent World War III. Pitke (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
this is only an PNG version of the SVG. We need only one, after any use is replaced. Antemister (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 00:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
I have opened this DR discussion in order to save this image. It's a screenshot of a scam/spam invitation the uploader received via LinkedIn. IMO, in this screenshot only the included portrait of Mrs. Gaddafi, now pixelated, is copyrightable and seems to be an agency shot. As the screenshot is usful, I want to ask for other's opinions about whether the current pixelation of the portrait is enough to prevent any copyright violation or whether the portait needs to be completely blanked-out. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep It does not appear to me there is anything eligible for copyright in the file as it stands. I think the tag should be changed from CC to PD-ineligible. -Pete F (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
If Ayesha Gaddafi is a real person, then I think this should be deleted -- it is not appropriate to connect a real person with a scam, even if it should be obvious that the real person was bait -- a victim -- and not the perpetrator. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Good point James, I agree. -Pete F (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Jim. We don't know that this isn't a real person FASTILY 00:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Тарас Покутянин
[edit]User Тарас Покутянин uploaded these files:
- File:Борцям за волю України.jpg (seems modern memorial)
- File:Імена повстанців.jpg (copyrightable text from earliest 1946)
- File:Хрест в. к..jpg (all other is ineligible for copyright, but in full resolution the infotable is clearly readable and it is copyrightable, from earliest 1946)
- File:Фатівці.jpg (seems modern building)
- File:Церква (1995 р.).jpg (1995 building)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete
- I'd like to have someone who reads the language look at this -- a gravestone might not be copyrightable -- "John Jones, beloved husband of Mary and father of Peter and Susan" with dates does not have a copyright.
- Keep De Minimis. The text is barely legible at full size and may just be species information anyway.
- Delete
- Delete
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I have never learned Ukrainian, but as Ukrainian and Russian are similar languages and meaning of some words I can guess, I give rough translation: "Forever fame. For remembering great people, who for future generations sacrificed their lives on altar of Ukrainian independence." After that come names, coverup names, birth years and home villages of three men. Second and third photo have the same infotable. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: all deleted. #3 deleted per Tavio's translation FASTILY 00:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
This page isn't making any sense. This page, "plastic" is a subpage of "plastic objects" which is a category of again. If there is explained, what plastic is, then the or a subpage there would be the right place. Even the explanation on this page is wrong: plastic is always a polymer - so you can't confuse it... Minihaa (talk) 20:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 00:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)