Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/10/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-10-11_23-44.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
--Bleumotte는_2013년_서울에서_설립된_미술창작소이다-_2013-10-10_10-14.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.JPG){kind=link}
_01.JPG){kind=link}
![315 File:Ariane 5 ATV-4 "Albert Einstein" (8966495161).jpg](#File:Ariane_5_ATV-4_"Albert_Einstein"_(8966495161).jpg){kind=link}
Created accidentally - was intended to be a Category, DAJF (talk) 02:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Please use {{Speedy}} for minor housekeeping. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
unused user image out of scope McZusatz (talk) 12:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: in use McZusatz (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This is poster artwork, and I have doubts it is the uploaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is a derivative work of copyrighted content; no permission for a free release given; High Contrast (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 17:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is a derivative work of copyrighted content; no permission for a free release given; de minimis does not apply for this image High Contrast (talk) 17:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is a derivative work of copyrighted content; no permission for a free release given; High Contrast (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is a derivative work of copyrighted content; no permission for a free release given; High Contrast (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
"Own work" is unlikely to be correct. Leyo 10:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep - er, it was a sloppy transfer, and still has the source information right below the infobox (which I moved up). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't consider the possibility of a sloppy transfer by a user with more than 20,000 edits…
I withdraw my nomination but I am leaving the tag. The uploader may remove it when adding a description. --Leyo 20:24, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Alex (talk) 09:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copied from Facebook. Yann (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: This design is copyrighted by Apple (see https://emojipedia.org/dizzy-face/ for reference). ~ nicolas (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Icelandic "freedom of panorama" images are free only for non-commercial uses.--Wdwd (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- for me this applies only to art--MartinS (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 20:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. -- Cirt (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect diagram for this name (noted on image talkpage): O is position #1, so methyl is on #3 not #2. Image is unused and already have File:3-methyloxetane.svg as this chemical in same file-format and correctly named. Image was apparently created as a vectorization of File:2-methyloxetane.png (and named accordingly) but a mistake was made when creating the image itself. DMacks (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Misnamed, unused, and unneeded because of the properly name equivalent File:3-methyloxetane.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 11:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Per the image itself and per the description/filename, this seems to be a personal shot, not really meant to be published. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image and not in scope. Amada44 talk to me 21:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Very poor quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stunteltje (talk • contribs) 2013-10-12T21:46:48 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 09:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality, plenty alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 11:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
This picture too does not have the correct source. It is still under US Copyright, having been published the the ACME News Photo Division of the International News Service, a UPI owned company. It was taken on the day of Gandhi's funeral in early February 1948. See for example this site:http://www.ebay.com/itm/1948-Original-Photo-MAHATMA-GANDHI-India-ASSASSINATED-Funeral-HISTORIC-/151104086445?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item232e8161ad for the credit information on the back of the picture. As such, PD India does not apply. Fowler&fowler (talk) 01:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
No proper details where the original pictures are coming from The Banner (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - They were displayed on the page; the uploader has now changed them to links. Peter James (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Sourced Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Sur cette série de clichés, dont l'auteur est un certain Garulfo 777, dont ce cliché, il y a mon épouse et moi-même. Ou des personnes, en plus de nous, invitées lors de la célébration de notre mariage. Ces photos appartiennent à une série de clichés que nous considérons faire partie intégrante de notre vie privée. Nous refusons par conséquent que ces photos soient diffusées, d'aucune façon que ce soit, sur internet, ce qui inclut Wikipédia et Wikimedia Commons. Respectueusement, Bruno Maïorana, Karine Illand-Maïorana Bruno Maïorana (talk) 16:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Request from subject. Mariage. Private life event more than general public event. Photo of poor technical quality anyway and not likely useful. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Sur ce cliché il y a mon épouse et moi-même. Ou des personnes, en plus de nous, invitées lors de la célébration de notre mariage. Ces photos appartiennent à une série de clichés que nous considérons faire partie intégrante de notre vie privée. Nous refusons par conséquent que ces photos soient diffusées, d'aucune façon que ce soit, sur internet, ce qui inclut Wikipédia et Wikimedia Commons. Respectueusement, Bruno Maïorana, Karine Illand-Maïorana
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Uploader claims {{PD-CAGov}}, but I don't think that applies.
- The template only applies"State of California employee, taken or made during the course of the person's official duties." Even though it's a state school, I don't think that applies to employees of UC Davis.
- EXIF states "2011, UC Regents, all rights reserved"
- Source website says "Copyright © The Regents of the University of California, Davis campus. All rights reserved."
Deleted: No proof that PD-CAGov applies to universities Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality, better alternatives: file:Morphine structure.svg or file:Morphine numbered.svg. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 11:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Ring annotation incorrect (compare file:Morphine structure.svg or file:Morphine numbered.svg) Yikrazuul (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - I did this as an exact copy (as svg) of a rather poor jpg on en-wiki (now deleted) - since the file is not in use and there is a better version, then no need to keep Ronhjones (Talk) 16:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 11:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant and blurred. Similar, clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: very blured. out of scope. Amada44 talk to me 21:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, essentially per Ellin Beltz (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Low quality penis photo, see COM:PENIS -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant copyvio: http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/4011 Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 04:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Commons:FOP#Morocco only permits commercial use if the copyrighted work is not the main subject of the reproduction. LGA talkedits 01:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Only used in rejected article at [1]; borderline out-of-scope Ubcule (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If not out of scope, likely a copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Only used in rejected article at [2]; borderline out-of-scope Ubcule (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Very poor quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stunteltje (talk • contribs) 2013-10-12T21:51:32 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 09:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Scan from a very likely non-free postcard, hence copyright violation / Скан з, найімовірніше, невільної листівки, а отже порушення авторських прав NickK (talk) 00:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
_2013-10-11_23-44.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-10-11_23-44.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Alex (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE, personal unused image. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 1
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. 1981 monument. See w:en:Mother Motherland, Kiev.
- File:Kiev - Motherland monument2.jpg
- File:Kiev - Motherland monument3.jpg
- File:Kiev - Motherland monument4.jpg
- File:Kiev warmuseum 070611 01.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland - Museum of Great Patriotic War-Kyev-Ukraine.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland Monument, Museum of the Great Patriotic War complex. Kiev, Ukraine, Eastern Europe.jpg
- File:Motherland Monument-2.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 002.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 003.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 004.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 005.jpg
- File:Rodina Mat' .jpg
- File:Rodina mat'.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, they can be deleted, if there is FOP problem. Btw, should all the pictures of the Motherland monument in Kiev be deleted? ---Kulmalukko (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 002.jpg may fall under {{PD-RU-exempt}} as contains COA of Soviet Union (and it is main object of the photo).--Anatoliy (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama. See also w:Mother Motherland, Kiev.
- File:2005-08-15 Motherland Rodina Mat Monument Kiev 312.JPG
- File:2005-08-15 Motherland Rodina Mat Monument Kiev 433.JPG
- File:Detail of The Mother Motherland monument 16m sword - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8600793975).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3942763587).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3942767265).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3943545734).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland (3943547340).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland Rodina Mat statue (8162257793).jpg
- File:Mother Motherland statue (8162375308).jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland - Museum of Great Patriotic War-Kyev-Ukraine.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland Monument, Museum of the Great Patriotic War complex. Kiev, Ukraine, Eastern Europe-2.jpg
- File:Mother of the Fatherland Monument, Museum of the Great Patriotic War complex. Kiev, Ukraine, Eastern Europe.jpg
- File:Motherland Monument-2.jpg
- File:Motherland-Kiev.jpg
- File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 001.jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8600682945).jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8600686045).jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8601782238).jpg
- File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8601784042).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-матір (вид з обеліску вічного-вогню).JPG
- File:Батьківщина-матір.JPG
- File:Батьківщина-мати. Місто Київ.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 01.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 02.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 03.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 04.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 05.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 06.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 07.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 08.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 09.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 1.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 10.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 11.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 12.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 2.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 4.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері 5.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері у Києві.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері, Київ.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері, м. Київ.JPG
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері.JPG
- File:Монумент Родина-мать.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all, except for File:Museum of the Great Patriotic War - Kiev - 001.jpg which is more of a panoramic photo. Undelete all in 2081 (Borodai died in 2010). russavia (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep also thos one: File:The Mother Motherland monument soaring 102m. above ground level - Museum of Great Patriotic War (8601782238).jpg --178.2.56.234 12:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Why? The photo clearly focuses on the statue. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per comments McZusatz (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044.
- File:Kiev Mother Motherland IMG 6246 1725.jpg
- File:Монумент Вітчизни-матері Monumento a la Madre Patria 3.jpg
- File:Парк Вічної Слави 4.jpg
- File:Стауя київської Батьківщини-матері у Бахчисарайському парку мініатюр.JPG
Josve05a (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 2
[edit]no FoP in Ukraine - monument designed by Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 08:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
--- Deleted: per INeverCry. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 3
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Copyright expires in 2081
- File:80-382-0520 Родина-мать.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother monument front.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother monument with tanks.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (1).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (10).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (2).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (3).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (4).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (5).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (6).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (7).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (8).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати, Київ (9).jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати.jpg
- File:Київ, вул. Лаврська 27, Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Off-shell (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 4
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine).
- File:1.Київ 2012 (Батьківщина-Мати).jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother-land close.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother-land.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 01.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 03.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 04.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 05.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 5
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. (Built in 1981.)
- File:2018-04-16 Motherland monument in Kiev.jpg
- File:Kiev - panoramio (85).jpg
- File:Kiev 106 Monument to the Motherland.jpg
- File:Pechers'kyi district, Kiev, Ukraine - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Pechersk 473.JPG
- File:Pechersk 4730.jpg
- File:Statue of Motherland - panoramio.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» 02.jpg
- File:Родина-мать (Киев) (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- O co dokładnie chodzi? Fafik Napisz coś® 17:46, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- This statue is protected by copyright law, until the designer has been dead for 70 years. --Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK, i understand. Fafik Napisz coś® 09:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- This statue is protected by copyright law, until the designer has been dead for 70 years. --Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 6
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. (The designer died 9 years ago.)
- File:Playing Soldiers At War Memorial (236349933).jpeg
- File:Pechers'kyi district, Kiev, Ukraine - panoramio (225).jpg
- File:Родина Мать - panoramio.jpg
- File:The Motherland Monument - Kiev - Ukraine - 03 (29868142968).jpg
- File:The Motherland Monument - Kiev - Ukraine - 02 (42834941525).jpg
- File:The Motherland Monument - Kiev - Ukraine - 01 (42834942845).jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
- File:Київ Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать".jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 4.jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 3.jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 2.jpg
- File:Памятник "Родина мать" 1.jpg
- File:Монумент "Батьківщина Мати".jpg
- File:Motherland Statue.jpg
- File:Motherland Statue in Kiev.jpg
- File:Kiev’s Motherland Statue.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» в Києві.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» в Києві1.jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC) Please do not delete. Photos are copyright. No violations. DENAMAX (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 7
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. 1981 monument. See w:en:Mother Motherland, Kiev. The designer died in 2010.
- File:80-382-0520 Монумент «Батьківщина-мати».jpg
- File:Mutter-Heimat-Statue Kiev.jpg
- File:Pechers'kyi district, Kiev, Ukraine - panoramio (268).jpg
- File:Rodina matj.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати 03.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати в Києві.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати.jpg
- File:Мати 0337.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» P1140475.jpg
- File:Національний музей історії України у Другій світовій війні DSC 7295.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Off-shell (talk) 22:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 8
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
- File:Detail of Rodyna Mat (Mother's Statue) - Museum of the History of Ukraine in World War Two - Kiev - Ukraine - 01 (26735709440).jpg
- File:Motherland Monument.jpg
_-_Museum_of_the_History_of_Ukraine_in_World_War_Two_-_Kiev_-_Ukraine_-_01_(26735709440).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Off-shell (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 9
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
- File:Батьківщина-Мати ввечері 2016.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати.jpg
- File:Монумент «Батьківщина-мати» Киев.jpg
- File:Одина - Мать - автор, funsize - 18 авг 2010 В 1981 году на День Победы этот комплекс открывал генеральный секретарь ЦК КПСС Леони - panoramio.jpg
Off-shell (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 10
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
- File:Detail of Rodyna Mat (Mother's Statue ) - Museum of the History of Ukraine in World War Two - Kiev - Ukraine - 02 (27009680365).jpg
- File:Kiev- Motherland Monument.jpg
- File:Kyiv - Mother monument 1.jpg
- File:Mother Kyiv.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №10.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №11.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №12.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №13.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №2.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №3.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №4.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №5.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №6.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №7.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №8.jpg
- File:Батьківщина-Мати (Київ). Світлина №9.jpg
- File:Київ. Статуя Батьківщина-мати.jpg
_-_Museum_of_the_History_of_Ukraine_in_World_War_Two_-_Kiev_-_Ukraine_-_02_(27009680365).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9610.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9611.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9612.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%9613.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%962.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%963.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%964.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%965.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%966.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%967.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%968.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A1%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%E2%84%969.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Off-shell (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination.--- FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev 11
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. The designer died in 2010.
Off-shell (talk) 05:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stadiums in Morocco
[edit]Commons:FOP#Morocco only permits commercial use if the copyrighted work is not the main subject of the reproduction.
- File:Maroc-Stade-Laayoune.jpg
- File:Marrakech stadium.jpg
- File:Meeting International Mohammed VI d athletisme 2010-1.jpg
- File:Meeting International Mohammed VI d athletisme 2010-2.jpg
- File:Stade-Marrakech.jpg
- File:Stade-Tanger.jpg
LGA talkedits 01:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files of user Jfelipebass3
[edit]- File:SHAIRA PASABORDO ALZATE.png
- File:SHAIRA PIPE PELAEZ ALZATE.png
- File:SHAIRA OLIMPICA ALZATE.png
- File:LA33 SHAIRA ALZATE.png
- File:JHONNY RIVERA SHAIRA ALZATE.png
- File:ANDY rivera SHAIRA ALZATE.png
- File:ALZATE SHAIRA LOS TUPAMAROS.png
- File:ALZATE SHAIRA PIPE BUENO.png
- File:ANDY RIVERA ALZATE SHAIRA JHONNY RIVERA TUPAMAROS LA 33 PASABORDO OLIMPICA PIPE BUENO PIPE PELAEZ CANAL MIGENTE PREMIOS MI GENTE.png
- File:Alzate saludo.jpg
- File:Alzate concierto.jpg
- File:Alzate tv.png
- File:Alzate cantante.jpg
- File:Alzate.jpg
- File:LOGO ALZATE MUSICA.png
- File:Alzate cantante el amor musica.jpg
- File:Alzate Musica.png
- File:Stefan Medina.jpg
- File:Stefan Medina Atletico Nacional.jpg
Multiple copyright violation. Screenshots, CD covers, images without EXIF data, etc.--Montgomery (talk) 13:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Multiple copyright violation + per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anuoluwagbemiga Art Gallery (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:SHEPHERD BY OLADIMEJI.jpg
- File:From cradle to grave.jpg
- File:The Lord Supper with Saviour.jpg
- File:Bogiri olanu if there is no crack on the work.jpg
- File:Shepherd by oladimeji O I.jpg
- File:Great provider by Oladimeji O I.jpg
- File:Melody II.png
- File:Titled bogiri-olanu 2013 by oladimeji O.I..jpg
- File:Save our souls.jpg
- File:Melody2.jpg
- File:Gele odun bii kamoowe1.png
- File:"cradle to grave".jpg
- File:Oneness in unity.jpg
- File:"Gele odun bii ka moowe" head-gear does not fit unless you know how to tie it .JPG
- File:Enthrownment.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Modern art. Painter(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:37, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armandogattuso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Amada44 talk to me 21:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baires2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Aa-1.jpg
- File:Aa-2.jpg
- File:Aa-5.jpg
- File:Aa-6.jpg
- File:Aa-7.jpg
- File:Aa-11.jpg
- File:Aa-10.jpg
- File:Aa-4.jpg
- File:Aa-3.jpg
- File:Aa-8.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. also found larger sources elsewhere. Amada44 talk to me 21:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Feelingunwell? (talk · contribs)
[edit]The linked sources do not provide evidence that the versions of the images uploaded here are licenced {{OGL}} as claimed. For File:Lord Hill Leader of the House of Lords.jpg and File:Lord Hill Leader of the House of Lords.jpg they show different images, the others show a much lower resolution version of the image.
- File:David Willetts Minister of State.jpg
- File:Vince Cable Secretary of State.jpg
- File:Vince Cable Secretary of State for Business.jpg
- File:Lord Strathclyde Leader of the House of Lords.jpg
- File:Lord Hill Leader of the House of Lords.jpg
January (talk) 08:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: most like uploads from a well known sock, images are only under OGL if this version was explicitely found in the given source and released Denniss (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Apparent out-of-scope personal (unused) images. Nothing else from uploader; Commons is not a personal photo album.
- File:From Left To Right Yasser Ibrahim , Mohamed Yousri , Khaled Naser.jpg
- File:Mohamed Yousri In Shenawy sister Wedding.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 00:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pajero profecional (talk · contribs)
[edit]doubtful own work, many have websites on the photos, no exif
- File:Czhec3.jpg
- File:CZHEC2.JPG
- File:CZHEC1.JPG
- File:LAMPINO3.JPG
- File:LAMPINO2.JPG
- File:LAMPINO1.JPG
- File:Enzopileri8.jpg
- File:Enzopileri7.jpg
- File:Enzopileri6.jpg
- File:Enzopileri5.jpg
- File:Enzopileri4.jpg
- File:Enzopileri3.jpg
- File:Enzopileri2.jpg
- File:Egonhuska5.jpg
- File:Enzopileri1.jpg
- File:Egonhuska4.jpg
- File:Egonhuska3.jpg
- File:Egonhuska1.jpg
- File:Dulcito10.jpg
- File:Dulcito8.jpg
- File:Dulcito7.jpg
- File:Dulcito6.jpg
- File:Dulcito5.jpg
- File:Dulcito3.jpg
- File:Dulcito4.jpg
- File:Dulcito2.jpg
- File:DULCITO1.JPG
- File:CZHEC4.JPG
- File:Drake diamond20.jpg
- File:Drake diamond19.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 03:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: SpeedyDelete all uploads of user. All images where copyvios from various sources Amada44 talk to me 12:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ronisyahrony1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Petir.jpg
- File:Gunung merapi.jpg
- File:Tanah berlpbang unik.jpg
- File:Awan ajaib.jpg
- File:Tema,gambar..jpg
- File:Lab-laba berkepala manusia.jpg
- File:Rumah ajaeb.jpg
- File:Alam unik buatan manusia.jpg
- File:Peritiwa unik.jpg
- File:Pekerja keras.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Amada44 talk to me 21:14, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. Deleted per Precautionary principle -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/403935 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2006/04/11/403935.jpg = last modified: 11.04.2006, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/108767/0/Maxim/Huerta/pueblo/) as it was previously published via http://xtasis.org/foro/showthread.php?p=493115 = http://imgserv.ya.com/galerias2.ya.com/img/7/71a2dd3a5131f12fi3.jpg (last modified: 23.02.2005, apparently the original frame). Gunnex (talk) 07:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not free PierreSelim (talk) 10:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/955263/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2009/04/28/955263.jpg = last modified: 28.04.2009, see also file path, original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/465534/0/mercedes/mila/tribu/ "en una imagen de archivo"), republished via http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/478027/0/gran/hermano/casting/ (09.07.2009) as it was previously published via (cropped from) http://www.formulatv.com/fotos/mercedes-mila-entrevista-a-chiqui/ (23.01.2009, credits: "Carlos Serrano").
Additionally, regarding the ominous credit "en una imagen de archivo" by 20minutos.es: Per COM:PRP, considering mass deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures from 20minutos.es with byline "ARCHIVO" + Commons talk:Deletion requests/Pictures from 20minutos.es with byline "ARCHIVO" = (summary) "It was proven numerous times that "ARCHIVO" pictures from 20minutos.es are NOT created by 20minutos.es. See previous DRs." Gunnex (talk) 07:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not free PierreSelim (talk) 10:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
This is obviously a manipulated (face-replacement), copyviolating derivative of this commercial photo by Francois Durand from Getty Images Europe. It violates the copyright and the moral rights of the original photographer and the personality rights of the depicted Mrs. Sandrine Corman. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- No doubt. Delete. Tibauty (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Bleh! Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 10:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Too much file history. HappyHubie415 (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Own Image Delete HappyHubie415 (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 18:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletion request for my upload. HappyHubie415 (talk) 03:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small file, unused art of non-notable artist, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Highly doubtful that this old photograph is the uploader's own work; maybe some PD license does fit High Contrast (talk) 19:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unknown author and source, uploader is serial copyright violator. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Highly doubtful that this old photograph is the uploader's own work; maybe some PD license does fit High Contrast (talk) 19:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unknown source and author, uploader is serial copyright violator. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be advertisement or at least Commons:Derivative work from advertisements. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document with images of questionable copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As this university was founded in 1981, the 2 reliefs to the right and left of the entrance are still recent and copyrighted. As Sri lanka has no freedom-of-panorama exemption, this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. So, we need either a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Not required anymore. Keith Chadwick 11:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
--Bleumotte%EB%8A%94_2013%EB%85%84_%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%EC%97%90%EC%84%9C_%EC%84%A4%EB%A6%BD%EB%90%9C_%EB%AF%B8%EC%88%A0%EC%B0%BD%EC%9E%91%EC%86%8C%EC%9D%B4%EB%8B%A4-_2013-10-10_10-14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Bleumotte%EB%8A%94_2013%EB%85%84_%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%EC%97%90%EC%84%9C_%EC%84%A4%EB%A6%BD%EB%90%9C_%EB%AF%B8%EC%88%A0%EC%B0%BD%EC%9E%91%EC%86%8C%EC%9D%B4%EB%8B%A4-_2013-10-10_10-14.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not drawing photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The architect appears to be nl:Robert Puttemans (1902-78) (see [3]), who has not yet been dead for 70 years. Stefan4 (talk) 18:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Images taken from facebook account of another user. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably captures/scans of images that were published long ago. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but is clearly a recent sculpture and thereby still copyrighted. Ukraine regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Images taken from facebook account of some other user. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Whatthewhat123 (talk) 22:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete per above. No real use. Wizardman 15:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a recent sculpture by a living artist[4], installed in France, which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. Thereby, this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. So, either we get a permission or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a recent sculpture by a living artist[5], installed in France, which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. Thereby, this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. So, either we get a permission or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a recent sculpture by a living artist[6], installed in France, which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. Thereby, this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. So, either we get a permission or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Where is this, when was it built? Without knowing this, we have no idea whether it is suiable for FoP. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably captures/scans of images that were published long ago. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably captures/scans of images that were published long ago. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Image appears to be captured from TV or video. Also of rather low quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:La Fére inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 06:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work, no FoP in the U.S. Pens Through My Lens (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I took the image myself. The only other place outside of the Wikimedia Foundation that you'll even find this image is on my personal Photobucket account (which is private). Plus, there are COUNTLESS other images of bronze statues on Wikipedia that aren't at a deletion risk due to fair use guidelines. How much more proof do you need that I took this image myself? Jgera5 (talk) 03:30, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Having been in the same position, I can appreciate what you're saying. I have no doubt that you took the picture. However, as it is a derivative work, a photograph of a piece of art such as this can't be published without the consent of both copyright holders, yourself and the artist (Commons:Derivative_works & Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States). I have gone so far as to contact the sculptor to get permission to upload a photo of his work. While he was happy to have it used on Wikipedia, for that to be possible he would have to consent to having the photo published under a free license that would allow anyone the right to use it in a commercial product (Commons:Email templates). Understandably, that was something that he was not entirely comfortable with.Pens Through My Lens (talk) 05:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is a recent sculpture by a living artist, installed in Belgium, which regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sad but true. Ab damit. --Funke (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Image appears to be captured from TV or video. Also of extremely low quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Bad information: what is the author? when died the author? Ferbr1 (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There are no datas about the photographer, his work may have not expired yet Anna (Cookie) (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:Monaco inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This is likely a recent sculpture and thereby still copyrighted. As Russia regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption, this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Alex (talk) 09:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:Medoc inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 12:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a recent sculpture by a living artist[7], installed in France (see File:Fourmi géante 2, rond-point de Bédarieux.jpg), which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. Thereby, this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. So, either we get a permission or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Image looks like a reproduction of a printed photo. (Shot is said to be from 1993) Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
I want to upload a new profile picture instead Stubsy88 (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stubsy88: You could do that by using "Upload a new version of this file". This link is to be found under the upload history on the bottom half of the file page - as long as you're actually the copyright holder to the picture. Otherwise, use another filename! I'd rather say that a deletion won't be executed in order to save the licensing history. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea why there is such a discussion about my picture. I don't even know User:Denniss replaced my picture with his credits. --Lokomotive74 (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Lokomotive74: If you check the page logs, you'll see a version deletion. User Denniss reverted the file to the actual version that you uploaded, no replace did take place. I don't know what you mean with "his credits"... Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc: Sorry my fault. --Lokomotive74 (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea why there is such a discussion about my picture. I don't even know User:Denniss replaced my picture with his credits. --Lokomotive74 (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Images taken from facebook. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably captures/scans of images that were published long ago. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:Rochechouart inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 14:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 18:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Image taken from the facebook account of some otehr user. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:St_Andrew%27s_Church,_Paull.jpg Keith Chadwick Photography (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Not required anymore. Keith Chadwick 11:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator who is also original uploader requesting deletion of duplicate. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid reason to delete this good image. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably captures/scans of images that were published long ago. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation. Wizardman 17:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hovering in limbo as was part of a rejected Articles for Creation that was then updated to "improve" itself but never re-submitted. I suspect article (en:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Pink Window Creations) will again be declined by the time this file nomination discussion expires. Ubcule (talk) 22:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If it is "own work" then it is personal art and out of scope; if not, it is a copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This a copyrighted logo. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurred, low resolution tourist shot, we have a lot and much better images of Category:Karlskirche, Vienna Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
If this is considered a work of art, then it is surely still copyrighted. Due to its indoor-location, I doubt that it is covered by the freedom-of-panorama provisions in Spanish law. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Contains material which possibly was used without permission. McZusatz (talk) 16:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, has to b deleted as this is a modern sculpture (and a modern building), and there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, в России нет свободы панорамы, то есть памятники и здания охраняются авторским правом до смерти скульптора и архитектора и ещё 70 лет после смерти. Такие фотографии нельзя загружать на Викисклад, и я вынужден выставить фотографию на удаление. Ymblanter (talk) 10:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EagerToddler39 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Strongly doubt own work claim, see deleted media.
- File:Moses Bensusan.jpg
- File:Shaun Ross.jpg
- File:Hernan Lander at iFashion Week.jpg
- File:Hernan Lander.jpg
- File:Korean designer Soojin Lee.JPG
- File:South-Korean fashion designer Soojin Lee.JPG
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio from TMC TV channel/production company.
AT least three of this user's are near-certain copyvios that I will mark as "speedy"; File:Affiche viens partager ma vie candidats 2012.jpg (montage with transmission details and TV channel logo), File:Viens partager ma vie logo.jpg (programme logo) and File:Vol DR400 vpmv.JPG (DOGged/watermarked screencap).
The others have less direct evidence of being copyright violations, but many are in use at http://www.tmc.tv/viens-partager-ma-vie/, albeit apparently only at lower resolution. This would support the fact that the Commons uploads are original, but as they all have a "look" that fits in with the feel of the programme's website, it is likely that they were taken as part of a set for them.
It's theoretically possible that uploader is original photographer *and* has the rights to distribute them here, but he/she says nothing about that. Indeed, the lack of info has the hallmarks of a more-enthusiasm-than-caring-about-copyright copyvio-ing random user.
- File:Guillaume vpmv2.JPG
- File:Guillaume vpmv1.JPG
- File:Christophe vpmv1.JPG
- File:Natacha vpmv.JPG
- File:Christophe vpmv.JPG
- File:Guillaume vpmv.JPG
Ubcule (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of fan/promo photos, not own work. Other user's uploads were book covers.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mathew105601 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These exceed even the US's very high level of threshold of originality and are not PD-textlogo.
LGA talkedits 23:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. - Fma12 (talk) 02:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only image which should be replaced with wiki-tables.
- File:Myanmararmy2.jpg
- File:Myanmararmy.jpg
- File:Part.jpg
- File:Prat2.jpg
- File:Part1.jpg
- File:Part4.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by stuwilliamson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-resolution personal and/or promotional images; out of scope.
- File:Stu Williamson studio in Dubai.jpg
- File:Stu Williamson.jpg
- File:Stu Williamson Photography logo.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost identical image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be a release by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. According to their image use policy (http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/policies/image_use.html) commercial use is prohibited, and I do not see where this is strictly a work by a government employee. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture with same view (a bit clearer) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/1725145/0/dacion-pago/desahucio-hipotecas/iniciativa-legislativa-popular/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img2/recortes/2012/03/07/51371-944-550.jpg = last modified: 07.03.2012, see also file path) as it is credited with "Foto: ARCHIVO". It was several times republished by 20minutos.es, always credited with "ARCHIVO":
- http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/1335942/0/bancos-aceptan/dacion-pago-gobierno/se-conoceran-abril/ (12.03.2012)
- http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/1492194/0/desahucios-cada-dia/espana/impago-hipoteca-alquiler/ (02.06.2012)
- http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/1725145/0/dacion-pago/desahucio-hipotecas/iniciativa-legislativa-popular/ (08.02.2013)
Considering that the text of the news article from 07.03.2012 is credited with "EFE" ( = en:EFE, a Spanish international news agency), and was published identically by other media on that dayor even earlier it is most likely, that the image is also coming from EFE, because:
Credits with "Archivo" by 20minutos.es are constantly quite suspicious: Per COM:PRP, considering mass deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures from 20minutos.es with byline "ARCHIVO" + Commons talk:Deletion requests/Pictures from 20minutos.es with byline "ARCHIVO" = (summary) "It was proven numerous times that "ARCHIVO" pictures from 20minutos.es are NOT created by 20minutos.es. See previous DRs.". Gunnex (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view without the umbrella (with more light) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here, in which the man is less visible. (I assume, that the person is not the main object of this image.) Kulmalukko (talk) 15:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is in this image, in which the umbrella is less visible and the man is in a bit different position. (Additionally I assume that the man and umbrella are not the main object of this image.) Kulmalukko (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar image with the same view is here (clearer and better light). Kulmalukko (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here, in which the umbrella in upper left corner is not visible. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is this photo, in which the tree is less visible. (Maybe the tree is not the main object of this image.) Kulmalukko (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 17:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably captures/scans of images that were published long ago. Not the own work of uploader —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
OS is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Для того, чтобы показать рабочий стол, зачем удалять?
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Flag already exists under a different file name. Fry1989 eh? 17:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is in this picture. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work (screening) from non free image. . HombreDHojalata.talk 18:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a logo, so the claim that it is own work by the uploader is dubious.
The logo contains Atomium. The inclusion of the word "Rotterdam" in the logo suggests that the logo might have been drawn in the Netherlands. As a drawing can be made outside the country where an object is located, I don't know which copyright law we use, the Dutch or the Belgian one, for FOP situations. Stefan4 (talk) 18:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work from trademark logo [8] . HombreDHojalata.talk 18:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality ; Ste Chapelle is not visible on the photo (it was in the back of the photographer). This is the prefecture de police which is not an historic monument Tangopaso (talk) 19:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bitte diese Datei löschen, da sich auf dem Bild (rechts unten) das Wasserzeichen der Albertina befindet (ein großes A). Please delete the file, because in the bottom right corner you can find the logo of the Albertina museum (a large A). --Papergirl (talk) 09:09, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Image published already in June here. Also, used to create hoax article on :ru[9]. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar file is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar file is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, better straightened and clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant, and not straighted. Almost similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is this picture, in which is not the black things on right and left side of the image. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here (maybe clearer). Kulmalukko (talk) 20:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and redundant. Almost similar image (clearer) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Author request, without the permission to release them. Subí está imagen por error. Vivemarca (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, a bit clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and redundant. Similar, clearer picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical with this image. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and reduntant. An image of this same view and maybe same birds is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and redundant. The clearer image of these same birds is here Kulmalukko (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and redundant. Clearer image of these birds is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view (maybe clearer) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is this picture, in which the details are better shown. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image is here, in which is better light and details. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, maybe clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. This is almost similar. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view, maybe clearer is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and redundant. Similar, clearer picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
A bit blurred and redundant. Similar, clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Very similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image (more light) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred and redundant. Similar, maybe clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
_06.JPG){kind=link}
_05.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
_05.JPG){kind=link}
Redundant. Similar, maybe better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
_01.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
_02.JPG){kind=link}
_01.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
_01.JPG){kind=link}
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar, maybe better straightened is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, maybe better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and redundant. Almost similar, clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, maybe better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
no source, no permission McZusatz (talk) 21:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar picture is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better quality is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, a bit clearer image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image with better quality is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view with better light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar view, maybe better straightened is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
unused file. possibly out of scope McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status & unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/1071272 = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2010/04/24/1071272.jpg = last modified: 24.04.2010, see also file path, credited with "Foto: 20MINUTOS.ES") as it was published on the same day by http://elcomercio.pe/mundo/466723/noticia-politicos-sindicalistas-personalidades-espanolas-marchan-respaldo-juez-baltasar-garzon (24.04.2010, given credits to "FOTO: elmundo.es") = http://e.elcomercio.pe/66/ima/0/0/1/3/5/135276.jpg. "elmundo.es" indicates to en:El Mundo (Spain), the second largest printed daily newspaper in Spain and the largest digital newspaper = © Unidad Editorial Información General S.L.U..
The original news was created on the same day most likely by http://www.europapress.es/nacional/noticia-comienza-manifestacion-contra-impunidad-franquismo-20100424185342.html, republished by several other media (including elcomercio.pe). europapress.es indicates to en:Europa Press (news agency), a Spanish independent, privately held news agency. It is most likely that Europa Press flanked their news with an image pool for further use.
The file was uploaded on 25.04.2010 at Commons. At this time the CC-license of 20minutos.es was configured with (archive from 02.04.2010): "Esta licencia no se aplica a los contenidos publicados por 20minutos procedentes de los terceros siguientes: Textos, gráficos, informaciones e imágenes que vayan firmados o sean atribuidos a Agencias, Reuters, EFE, Europa Press, Korpa, (...)."
Concerning the credit "Foto: 20 minutos" it is widely known that 20minutos.es is cheating massively copyrights configuring copyrighted images from numerous sources with a free license and tagging this images falsely with "Foto: 20 minutos". The whole bandwith of copyright problems concerning 20minutos.es is available via Category:20minutos.es related deletion requests.
Gunnex (talk) 22:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
superseded by File:Motorway IL.svg McZusatz (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: bogus license as well JuTa 20:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
No permission to photograph the people (violation of personality rights - one depicted requested deletion)1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Es liegt keine Genehmigung vor die hier abgebildeten Personen zu fotografieren. --1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Violation of personality rights, as in Germany permission is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Typing error; the correct category is Category:Trams in Druzhkivka. MBxd1 (talk) 19:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
закладки рабочего стола 109.68.234.17 19:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Derivative of a PD logo. Keep Fry1989 eh? 22:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
As far as my thoughts go, feel free to delete it.--Impish (talk) 00:36, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Restored: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Bad-quality dupe of File:A plume on Betelgeuse (artist’s impression).jpg. Degraded colors than the original image. — Stas1995 (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: redirected to higher res version, better tag as dupe next time Denniss (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status & unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/imagen/997803/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2009/09/08/997803.jpg = last modified: 08.09.2009, see also file path, credited with "Foto: 20MINUTOS.ES", original news: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/512410/0/sanchez-arevalo/antonio-de-la-torre/entrevistas/) as it was posterior published (2 days later) via http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2009/09/10/cultura/1252591378.html (10.09.2009, updated on 11.09.2009) = http://estaticos04.cache.el-mundo.net/elmundo/imagenes/2009/09/10/1252591378_extras_ladillos_1_0.jpg (last modified: 10.09.2009) given credits to "Efe". "Efe" indicates to en:EFE, a Spanish international news agency.
Why did elmundo.es credited the image with "Efe" as it should be "20minutos.es"? And why this image apparently entered in the image pool of Efe? Done by 20minutos.es? Unlikely. It doesn´t make sense to distribute a supposedly free licensed image via Efe. It entered most likely in the image pool of Efe because the (unknown) photographer did it. And with this, it is most likely that this photographer didn´t agree to license this image under a "free" license.
Additional info: This image was taken on 06.09.2009 at the en:Venice Film Festival (see background poster of http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2009/09/08/997803.jpg and release dates via IMDB). I just do not believe that 20minutos.es sent a photographer from Spain to Italy to take only this picture.
And last but not least: It is widely known that 20minutos.es is cheating massively copyrights configuring copyrighted images from numerous sources with a free license and tagging this images falsely with "Foto: 20 minutos". The whole bandwith of copyright problems concerning 20minutos.es is available via Category:20minutos.es related deletion requests.
Per above reasons, nominating also the related crop of the image:
Gunnex (talk) 19:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Flipped copy of a photograph by André Bonin, copyrighted by éditions Gallimard. Copyright violation. 83.204.225.200 13:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- This image was originally posted to Flickr by Abode of Chaos website of Thierry Ehrmann. Who is the owner of the rights of this painter, Thierry Ehrmann or a photographer who wrongly puts his copyright on a photo in two dimentions? Here it is the author himself who puts his painting online with a Commons compatible license--JPS68 (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that Galimard (who initially published it?!), or the initial photographer is owner of all right of this final picture. For me, only the painter, Thierry Ehrmann as Abode of Chaos is the owner of rights. So this picture have to stay in commons. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- By copying this photograph (even flipped), Thierry Ehrmann violates Gallimard's copyright, just as Flickr and Commons. Gallimard will be briefed if this picture is not finally deleted. 82.124.184.170 14:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that Galimard (who initially published it?!), or the initial photographer is owner of all right of this final picture. For me, only the painter, Thierry Ehrmann as Abode of Chaos is the owner of rights. So this picture have to stay in commons. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This self-potrait has not educational value. Not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. There are others, I have nominated the group on the 17th of October. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The same photo had been published here and here already in 2012 and in both instances had been credited to "Estuardo Vera". Túrelio (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
As the uploader choose not to comment here, I have copied his objection from File talk:Jaime Ivan Kaviedes en Aucas.jpg to here:
- Do not understand why you want to delete these files, many files of my own authorship mine above me were erased, and I could not discuss to reach a consensus, I hope you read my inquitud here.
- They are citing newspaper sites whose publishers use the images that are free on the Internet, These files are of my authorship, and are free from any right of publication on the Internet, They have no copyright, for the same reason that even government and publishing pages use the files on the websites mentioned above. Help do not delete my files.
- The short time that we also want to delete the others I uploaded, because the find on other pages that many are not even accredited.--Berposen (talk) 14:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- So, two independant newspapers publish this photo already in 2012 and both with the same in-image credit "Estuardo Vera", but you claim it as your own? --Túrelio (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
(Obs.: high wiki use) Unlikely to be work of 20minutos.es (sourced with http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/158373/0/Boca/refuerza/liderato/ = http://cdn.20minutos.es/img/2006/10/03/515871.jpg = last modified: 03.10.2006, see also file path, curiously credited with "Argentina" = wth?) as it was previously published via http://www.elsalvador.com/noticias/2006/10/02/deportes/dep16.asp (02.10.2006) = http://www.elsalvador.com/noticias/2006/10/02/deportes/img/boca.jpg (last modified: 02.10.2006, see also file path, archived), here credited with " Foto: EDH/AP". "EDH" is most likely http://www.edhdeportes.com (sports agency based, as well as en:El Diario de Hoy, in El Salvador) and "AP" is conventionally the abbreviation for en:Associated Press. Gunnex (talk) 17:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oh yes. I'm the uploader and I didn't realize it was an AP photograph. Delete it!--Roblespepe (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete If the uploader himself admits the file should be deleted... what else can I add? - Fma12 (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- No doubt: Delete --Delfort (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- No doubt:
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
This self-potrait has not educational value. Not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. There are others, I have nominated the group on the 17th of October. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Likely not own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation from / Порушення авторських прав з: http://provolyn.com/news_2011-10-04/11097-luck-podav-ponad-10-proektiv-shchob-otrimati-groshi-ies.html NickK (talk) 02:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation from / Порушення авторських прав з: http://www.volynnews.com/news/analytic/iepyskop_markiyan_my_b_khotily_maty_sestru__yedynu_upts/ . The image on the website is in higher resolution / Зображення на сайті має вищу роздільність NickK (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]- File:Atomium pic-.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-001.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-002.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-003.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-004.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-007.JPG
- File:Atomium, Helsey Park, Brussels, Belgium.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. The Atomium is © SABAM 67.87.46.39 15:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Not that it matters, but Atomium seems to be © fr:André Waterkeyn's heirs. SABAM is a legal entity representing copyright holders in certain situations. For example, legal claims may come from SABAM on behalf of the copyright holder. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
These images show a building by w:André Waterkeyn. Belgian law doesn't allow photos of buildings without the permission of the architect unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years.
- File:AtoniumEvening BrusselsB.JPG
- File:AtoniumNightView BrusselsB.JPG
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:AtomiumBrusselsBanner.JPG
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all images. The Atomium is clearly the subject of these photos. 67.87.46.39 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom russavia (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No freedom of panorama in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
Derivative works of texts around and/or inside Atomium.
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (19).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (20).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (25).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep Nothing copyrightable shown in the image: all of them fall under {{PD-ineligible}} and/or {{PD-text}}. No FOP-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's no chance that something as long as this is {{PD-ineligible}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Stefan, I'm at least as respectful of literary copyright as you are, but I'm not sure about these. Although presented in sentence form, they amount to lists of names (in the first and third cases) and lists of dimensions (in the second case). I think these would fail copyright in the USA -- I don't really have any idea about the TOO for literary works in Belgium, but I think we can keep them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, PD-text or PD-ineligible --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]See COM:FOP#Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]No FOP in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Aside from the Atomium, which is obvious, I also doubt that the copyright to all of the other images in this poster belong to the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]Non-free architecture.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Belgium --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:La Reine inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 12:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото встречается в Интернете уже в 2010 году http://99edakyz99.ru/?m=199207 Dogad75 (talk) 12:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Видео было снято в 2010 году, как написано в описании. А сайт которого вы указали скопировал фото из Викискалада, а не наоборот. (The picture was taken in 2010, as can be seen in the description. Moreover, the website you cited took the picture from Commons, not the other way around.) Nataev (talk) 11:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This relief is likely a recent work and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exemption. So, either permission from sculptor is obtained or deletion required. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Italy. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This map is likely a recent work and might thereby still be copyrighted, if it's above threshold of original for Italy. Regrettably Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- It's ok, but I think that isn't the only image with this problem but all (or many of all) in the Category:Signs in Italy and Category:Historical information signs in Italy, if there is a consensus I do not object, but I want to be clear, an opinion against another opinion does not consent, and a map is far from my concept of a work of art. Sorry for my english.--Threecharlie (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Regrettably, we have no information about Italy in Commons:Threshold of originality. You might consult with some legally educated users on :it-Wikipedia in order to get information about what "threshold of originality" is applied by the courts in Italy. --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marcus Cyron as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book is from 1932 - and the picture as probably not made by the Author of the Book. So there's no evidence for a Copyright 70+ High Contrast (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Really, it is probably not made by the Author of the Book. Uploader mistake. However:
- Its author is anonymous so Template:Anonymous-EU applies.
- It is also published before 1994 without the photographer copyright notice, so the Template:PD-Polish applies to the photograph used there.
- License tag fixed. Ankry (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source clearly credits "ESA–S. Corvaja, 2013". An individual country/center within ESA cannot unilaterally declare ESA images as not All Rights Reserved. http://www.flickr.com/photos/dlr_de/8966495161/ High Contrast (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
![22:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/10/12#c-High_Contrast-2013-09-08T22:55:00.000Z-File:Ariane_5_ATV-4_"Albert_Einstein"_(8966495161).jpg){kind=link}
Keep This image comes from the official en:German Aerospace Centre flickr stream. The ones who placed it on flickr surely known very exactly which image is to publish under which license. Assuming anything else is pure speculation. Please ask directly the curators of this stream about their licensing. --High Contrast (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
![23:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/10/12#c-High_Contrast-2013-09-08T23:00:00.000Z-File:Ariane_5_ATV-4_"Albert_Einstein"_(8966495161).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: ? FASTILY 07:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
![07:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/10/12#c-Fastily-2013-10-12T07:56:00.000Z-File:Ariane_5_ATV-4_"Albert_Einstein"_(8966495161).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The EXIF data indicates that "ESA-StephaneCORVAJA" is the copyright holder. The DLR may have been lent usage of this image, but they do not have the ability to place the image under a free licence. I have been in correspondence with the ESA regarding their images, and free licencing is something they are looking at for the future, but at this time, this photo would need to be deleted as the DLR simply can't licence it under a free licence. russavia (talk) 17:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- They can, if the DLR has a permission to do so. And this seems to be likely. --High Contrast (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- If you can get something from the ESA affirming this, then we can keep it. But we can't forget COM:PRP in such instances; it is common for organisations to share their materials for promotional uses, but this doesn't give DLR the ability to licence it however they wish. As uploaders of materials, we should be mindful of such issues, and delete them as we should be required to do under COM:PRP. russavia (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, the other way. You can ask the DLR if this licensing is correct. The organisation DLR is trustworthy enough not to imply sloppiness with copyrights. All you are stating is pure speculation and a paranoid layout of COM:PRP which does not fit for images for such well-respected agencies. So, if you doubt that write an email --High Contrast (talk) 17:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're implying that governmental agencies will never make a mistake or simply overlook an issue. Because NASA has never inadvertently applied its no copyright rule to another agency's work, and has never labeled an image "Credit: NASA" that wasn't actually theirs (yes, I'm obviously being sarcastic). Sure, they've gotten much better in recent years at this, but it does still happen. Here we have an image that is clearly labeled as being ESA, not DLR. In addition, ESA by policy does not release their media under a free license save for two instances that I'm aware of: Hubble and European Southern Observatory. By even the most basic interpretation of the precautionary principle, this image should not be allowed here without further evidence in its favour or clarification from either ESA or DLR. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, I do not imply that governmental agencies will never make mistakes. Again, there is simply no reason for deleting it. Your argumentation is based on pure speculation. In order to crash the evidently given information, we do need clarification by the DLR in order to get the information if they have something wrong. Please excuse my bad English --High Contrast (talk) 18:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're implying that governmental agencies will never make a mistake or simply overlook an issue. Because NASA has never inadvertently applied its no copyright rule to another agency's work, and has never labeled an image "Credit: NASA" that wasn't actually theirs (yes, I'm obviously being sarcastic). Sure, they've gotten much better in recent years at this, but it does still happen. Here we have an image that is clearly labeled as being ESA, not DLR. In addition, ESA by policy does not release their media under a free license save for two instances that I'm aware of: Hubble and European Southern Observatory. By even the most basic interpretation of the precautionary principle, this image should not be allowed here without further evidence in its favour or clarification from either ESA or DLR. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, the other way. You can ask the DLR if this licensing is correct. The organisation DLR is trustworthy enough not to imply sloppiness with copyrights. All you are stating is pure speculation and a paranoid layout of COM:PRP which does not fit for images for such well-respected agencies. So, if you doubt that write an email --High Contrast (talk) 17:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- If you can get something from the ESA affirming this, then we can keep it. But we can't forget COM:PRP in such instances; it is common for organisations to share their materials for promotional uses, but this doesn't give DLR the ability to licence it however they wish. As uploaders of materials, we should be mindful of such issues, and delete them as we should be required to do under COM:PRP. russavia (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- This is the crux of the problem here. You believe that even in the face of contrary evidence this image should be kept for one reason: because DLR published it on their Flickr feed without changing their default license. Conversely, I believe that in order to keep the image, we need more information. This is the entire point of the precautionary principle...it's prejudiced against a questionable file, not in favour of it. To keep, we would need word from DLR or, preferably, ESA that the license is valid. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, this is all I was writing about. Can you write an Email to the ESA in order to get 100% certainty? --High Contrast (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have been in correspondence with the ESA on matters of licencing in general, and this is why this image needs to be deleted. The ESA is deeply involved in looking at making their works available under a CC licence, but I was advised that at this time their images will continue to be only made available under (C) All Rights Reserved. This was in relation to their photos in general, not this particular image. Their own Flickr stream is available only under (C) All Rights Reserved, and this image is no different to the US military making Canadian images under a free licence, when we know that the Canadian armed forces themselves do not do this. As Huntster states, this is precisely what COM:PRP is in place for. russavia (talk) 12:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well, precisely what COM:PRP is in place for in your opinion. You russavia only come up here in order to mash against me as you did previously. But let's be constructive and wait for your email response. --High Contrast (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have been in correspondence with the ESA on matters of licencing in general, and this is why this image needs to be deleted. The ESA is deeply involved in looking at making their works available under a CC licence, but I was advised that at this time their images will continue to be only made available under (C) All Rights Reserved. This was in relation to their photos in general, not this particular image. Their own Flickr stream is available only under (C) All Rights Reserved, and this image is no different to the US military making Canadian images under a free licence, when we know that the Canadian armed forces themselves do not do this. As Huntster states, this is precisely what COM:PRP is in place for. russavia (talk) 12:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, this is all I was writing about. Can you write an Email to the ESA in order to get 100% certainty? --High Contrast (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As per Russavia and Huntster. The onus is on those seeking to upload or keep an image that it has been appropriately licensed (not for others to go out and prove a negative). We've had this identical issue before, as Russavia points out. It also sounds like we've already heard from ESA. Delete, without prejudice to restoring the image if anyone gets confirmation from DLR or elsewhere that the image has been freely licensed by ESA. Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Videos of hail
[edit]These videos are unused and have such low quality that I don't think they are educationally usable for anything, especially not for illustrating hail.
darkweasel94 19:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Until the higher quality videos are provided, don'r delete them!--Quahadi Añtó 12:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This file includes Non-free creative text. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work. -Yhngv (talk) 14:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Comment I think this needs a Japanese reader to evaluate -- I suspect that there may not be enough here to qualify as a literary work. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
This file includes Non-free creative text. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio as literary work. -Yhngv (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I think this needs a Japanese reader to evaluate -- I suspect that there may not be enough here to qualify as a literary work. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Blatant textbook scan/copyright violation Wizardman 16:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like a scan to me. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- The fade on the lettering and grayish border around certain parts shows that it was a scan. The lettering and borders would be a lot crisper if it wasn't. Wizardman 17:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Isn't that just because the image is an {{Overcompressed JPEG}}? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- The fade on the lettering and grayish border around certain parts shows that it was a scan. The lettering and borders would be a lot crisper if it wasn't. Wizardman 17:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Following on from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Australian rules football jumpers and given the very low threshold of originality in Australia this is just derivative copy of team jumper design
LGA talkedits 06:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Despite the ToO can be very low in Australia, these patterns are too simple to be copyrighted.... - Fma12 (talk) 02:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Given this just as simple flag is copyrighted (see this court ruling) then the above are more than likely also copyright in Australia. LGA talkedits 02:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
This image is a derivative work of copyrighted content; no permission for a free release given; de minimis does not apply High Contrast (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Presumably the only issue relevant to DW is the photograph. This is a MOD photo and the OGL appears to apply as this has been put in the public domain. I find the same photo at higher resolution at: --Fæ (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Can you please provide clear evidence that this image is in the public domain, please? --High Contrast (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, I can only show that this is owned by the MOD and that there is a credit to that effect (see #3 above). Maybe someone else can track down a better source. --Fæ (talk) 17:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Can you please provide clear evidence that this image is in the public domain, please? --High Contrast (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep Denniss (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment The latter vote is a fransformed keep vote after having had contact with User:Deniss. He did not refuse this procedure. --High Contrast (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, after more than month, copyright status is still unclear. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
