Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/09/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
_Pictures_010.png){kind=link}
-Captain_Vanostende.P(Belgium)-Imi(the_founder)-Gideon.R-_First_generation_Netanya-Israel.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![50 File:George Cortelyou's home "Harbor Lights" 2013-09-15 16-10.jpg](#File:George_Cortelyou's_home_"Harbor_Lights"_2013-09-15_16-10.jpg){kind=link}
![52 File:Grundschule "Fritz Reuter".JPG](#File:Grundschule_"Fritz_Reuter".JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![121 File:"Voz del Pueblo, Voz de Dios".jpg](#File:"Voz_del_Pueblo,_Voz_de_Dios".jpg){kind=link}
porn file for vandalism Torin (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment: That’s not a valid DR motive. It probably needs to be deleted for being a case of copyright violation, while the file page surely lacks any kind of permission, but I’ll leave the matter to be researched by the nominator, apparently so interested in the subject. -- Tuválkin ✉ 05:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
own error, should be Category Andy king50 (talk) 09:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 10:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
la rochette enneigée Jouhet (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Please use {{Speedy}} for routine housekeeping. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
ich (Hoger) habe mich beim benennen der datei vertan, das kann ich ja nun nicht mehr ändern? sie doppelt nun das korrekt benannte bild. Hoger (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Dateien können umbenannt werden. Wo soll denn das korrekt benannte Bild sein? --Didym (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Also, ich kenne mich noch nicht so aus, sorry! es ist so, dass ich mit dem hochladeassistenten mehrere bilder gleichzeitig hochgeladen habe. beim benennen der dateien zweier bilder habe ich aus versehen den gleichen dateinamen eingegeben. daraufhin ist eine völlige unordnung beim hochladen entstanden. man sieht zweimal das selbe bild, aber mit der falschen beschreibung (nämlich der des anderen bildes). nun kann ich weder das eine noch das andere bild erneut hochladen, da der hochladeassistent sagt, es gäbe das bild bereits im wiki...
- ich habe noch nicht herausgefunden, wie ich die datei an sich umbenenne. kann man nicht die beiden bilder / dateien einfach komplett löschen und ich lade beide bilder wieder fehlerfrei hoch? Hoger
- Da das Bild sowieso noch gedreht werden muss, was wieder eine neue Version erzeugt, habe die Datei jetzt gelöscht. Eine Trennung der Versionsgeschichte auf zwei Dateien ist in deisem Fall leider auch nicht möglich, da die erste Version fehlt. Jetzt müsstest du die Dateien problemlos hochladen können. Das Umbenennen von Dateien ist hier erklärt. --Didym (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Danke!!! Hoger
Deleted: Didym (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Die Dateibezeichnung ist nicht eindeutig Mannausludwigslust (talk) 16:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted and redirected to duplicate File:Platz des Friedens 1 - Bild 1.JPG JuTa 20:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Internet image without permission CennoxX (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep Permission is given at the end of the page.--CennoxX (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Internet image without permission CennoxX (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Source is provided. And there is permission to use under GFDL there.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I feel sorry, now I've seen that notice too.--CennoxX (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The page has a clear permission notice.CennoxX (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of permission or proof of ownership. Uploader has long history of misrepresenting others' work. DMacks (talk) 19:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- See also File:Anjnaaz.jpg by the same uploader. That looks like a photoshop of this image from PornPR.com (comparatively safe for work). Huon (talk) 21:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Article about this person in this context was deleted from en.wp as attack/negative-blp. DMacks (talk) 00:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 18:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
The only article link to this image is speed deleted as personal disparage.--DreamLiner (talk) 17:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope FASTILY 09:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
美人鱼2846903590 221.0.16.175 03:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Can someone explain why this should be deleted? Multichill (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: just vandalism shizhao (talk) 02:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Non PD-old. The painter(운보 김기창) was dead in 2001. ChongDae (talk) 09:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
infringement of copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salamander724 (talk • contribs) 2013-09-15T04:23:31 (UTC)
no FOP in France Bzh-99 (talk) 14:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
no FOP in France Bzh-99 (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
no FOP in France Bzh-99 (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Child pornography Perumalism Chat 06:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
looks like its an advertisement of some company that sells ink for printers. Dudek1337 (talk) 00:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Assuming that this sculpture is located in Denmark[1] and that the sculptor isn't dead since >70 years, this photo is a derivative as FOP in Denmark is valid only for buildings. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused bad quality photos. Alex (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Image (uploaded in 01.2013) about a Brazilian medic (1909-1986). Unlikely to be own work, previously published (even with lower res) via http://www.felicidadetupinamba.com.br/index_bd.php?categoria=9&coluna=181 (2009) = http://www.felicidadetupinamba.com.br/administra/paginas/images/not2022_0.jpg (last modified: 2010) Gunnex (talk) 08:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Considering User talk:Acarvalhof1 (several failed attempts to upload copyrighted images about a Brazilian businessman) per COM:PRP: unlikely to be own work. Gunnex (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Brazilian municipality pt:Itapuã do Oeste founded in 1992 (with denomination Jamari, in 1997 renamed to Itapuã do Oeste), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) prior to 1983." No trivial text logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}. Gunnex (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Brazilian municipality pt:Pedras de Maria da Cruz founded in 1992, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) prior to 1983." No trivial text logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}. Gunnex (talk) 20:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Still screenshot from maps.soso.com? Liangent (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
out of com:scope. Text files are not allowed. Also {{Badjpeg}} McZusatz (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
_Pictures_010.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Pictures_010.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license and OTRS tags refer to a 2004 Cannabis Encyclopedia from Russia which also used this 1934 US photo. Per the OTRS noticeboard, the photo is not mentioned in the OTRS permission, and I think it is extremely unlikely that the people collating that encyclopedia had any specific rights to this image. Since neither the original source nor an author are named, we cannot determine the image's copyright status, and therefore it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 15:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
_Pictures_010.png){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
_Pictures_010.png){kind=link}
Doesn;t look like own work to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately has to be deleted as copyrighted material. Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately has to be deleted as copyrighted material. Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Probably not de minimis for that file. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 10:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient information to verify the claim that it is anonymous and in either case it is copyrighted in the United States due to COM:URAA. Stefan4 (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
See w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 September 2#File:Detail avi.jpg. Stefan4 (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Useless without a description 91.66.153.214 11:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused user portrait 91.66.153.214 10:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, I'm sorry. Jebulon (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Douieb.R(french)-Captain Vanostende.P(Belgium)-Imi(the founder)-Gideon.R- First generation Netanya-Israel.png
[edit]-Captain_Vanostende.P(Belgium)-Imi(the_founder)-Gideon.R-_First_generation_Netanya-Israel.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Captain_Vanostende.P(Belgium)-Imi(the_founder)-Gideon.R-_First_generation_Netanya-Israel.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious "own work" with watermark. 91.66.153.214 10:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
doubted to be 'own work' : format/date/exif missing. Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
doubted to be 'own work' : format/date/exif missing. Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
doubted to be 'own work' : format/date/exif missing. Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
doubted to be 'own work' : format/date/exif missing. Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
doubted to be 'own work' : format/date/exif missing. Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a 3D object, so {{PD-Art}} doesn't apply. Permission is needed from the photographer. See for example COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Stefan4 (talk) 17:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis for that file. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Está duplicado. Lo subí por error como un archivo nuevo, cuando es una mejora de uno ya existente. Ulaidh (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Another file with the same file name but belong to other organization (Family Online Safety Institute) always appear instead of the proper logo.
There is no evidence that the uploader made this. Also, a logo would normally be a work for hire, and in many countries, the copyright holder to a work for hire isn't the author but the organisation which uses the logo. I'm not sure what the Indonesian law says about this, but even if the author might have been the initial copyright holder, it is probably standard practice to transfer the copyright to a logo to the organisation that it represents in order to make it possible for the organisation to use its logo when it wants to do so. Stefan4 (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
no FOP in France Bzh-99 (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
There is no indication that this is actually in the public domain. InverseHypercube 01:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Obviously a derivative work of a photograph in a book. No further licensing information given. Maybe some PD license fits? Can someone bring valid evidence High Contrast (talk) 20:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
![20:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/15#c-High_Contrast-2013-09-15T20:12:00.000Z-File:George_Cortelyou's_home_"Harbor_Lights"_2013-09-15_16-10.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
![09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/15#c-Fastily-2013-09-22T09:32:00.000Z-File:George_Cortelyou's_home_"Harbor_Lights"_2013-09-15_16-10.jpg){kind=link}
Personal information in EXIF data. Will upload new file with ammended EXIF data. Tetramesh (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Die Datei ist doppelt vorhanden und wird nicht mehr benötigt. Mannausludwigslust (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
![16:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/15#c-Mannausludwigslust-2013-09-15T16:57:00.000Z-File:Grundschule_"Fritz_Reuter".JPG){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
![09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/15#c-Fastily-2013-09-22T09:32:00.000Z-File:Grundschule_"Fritz_Reuter".JPG){kind=link}
copyright infringement SeyitA (talk) 10:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure whether the threshold of originality assessment is correct. The person who made this image chose quite a lot of words, and there might be some copyright protection for the selection of words. Stefan4 (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal information in EXIF data. Will upload new file with ammended EXIF data. Tetramesh (talk) 14:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
blatant copyvio (http://vetranhcat.com/video) DHN (talk) 22:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Either its copyrighted and out of scope with respect to WLM. Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio because image is a derivative of the screen content in upper half of image. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Keep it seems that the screen content is show the situation in the stage, i don't see there have any problem--Wing1990hk (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per COM:DW. INeverCry 18:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Most likely (as other fresh detected copyvios) cropped from unknown source. See also User talk:Beatriz Menezes Nascimento... Gunnex (talk) 09:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation from http://www.kagialikos.gr/ C messier (talk) 15:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
not own work (see watermark) Sealle (talk) 14:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis for that file. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
doubted to be 'own work' : format/date/exif missing. And appears to be one of images downloaded from Commons only.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mysorepalace.jpg Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sfan00 IMG as no permission (no permission since)
Probably below the threshold of originality. Licence may be unfree as it says that "The Republic may demand the removal of those works in case an obvious case of plagiarism is found." Stefan4 (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: pd-shape FASTILY 20:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Escargoten as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: symbol. Previously kept at DR, thoughts? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no argument as to why PD-shape is incorrect. —holly {chat} 21:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Still screenshot from maps.soso.com? Liangent (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE and likely a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
this image comes from http://www.thefullwiki.org/Maureen_Herman which gets its information and media from wikipedia their is no proof that the orininal author put it in the public domain Dman41689 (talk) 06:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Quote: I don't need myself depicted here anymore. The picture depicts me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Михајло Анђелковић (talk • contribs) 2013-09-11T21:13:27 (UTC)
--JuTa 19:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Miss Commonwealth in company of KGGA International Commissioner on tour to Western Kenya.jpg
[edit]
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Quote: tried to rename the title to Miss Commonwealth Africa 2010 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deefaith (talk • contribs) 2013-09-12T17:20:25 (UTC)
--JuTa 20:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
this is my personal photo , I want to delete it , Because of privacy — Preceding unsigned comment added by محمد الفلسطيني (talk • contribs) 2013-09-14T12:46:28 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
It is highly unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright to either the TIME front page or the image therein. Ww2censor (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://www.indianexpress.com/picture-gallery/ranveer-singh-shows-off-his-dance-moves-at-samsung-galaxy-s4-launch/2606-1.html - blatant copyvio considering the Indian Express watermark Dl2000 (talk) 16:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis for that file. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Same image used as Twitter profile picture for the person depicted so potential copyvio: https://twitter.com/navalpreetrangi Stefan4 (talk) 00:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
No description. 91.66.153.214 15:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and not {{PD-self}} by uploader Kammus007: Uploaded in 13.12.2006, apparently coming from (as indicated) http://www.araguaina.to.gov.br/ (Brazilian municipalitys official site). In 11.2006 the official site was licensed with "Photos and matters of public interest may be copied without restriction. Copyright Prefeitura Municipal de Araguaína" which is (concerning derivative work & commercial use of the work = allowed?) insufficient.
If the indicated link http://www.araguaina.to.gov.br/ is only part of the description (and not the original source), then the file is copyvio via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=417550 (06.12.2006, "Cerrado") = http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k19/cerrado_2006/araguananoite.jpg (last modified: 06.12.2006). Gunnex (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
La Villa Savoye n'est pas encore dans le domaine public. Pas de liberté de panorama en France. VIGNERON (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted from here. --Interfase (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Exact source, date and copyright-status are unclear, picture is highly likely made by Bas de Meijer and copyrighted or non-commercial Sonty (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
File is no longer in use--Seti6908 (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Neither a date nor an original author nor an original source is given, so the GFDL and CC license tags cannot be correct. Given the lack of information, we also cannot assume the image is in the PD. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 22:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. russavia (talk) 02:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
file redundant. article not published Chi2 (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - WLM 2013. and
|
Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Not sure what this should be used for. Low quality noisy audio file. McZusatz (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Not sixty years old, not PD-India for quite some time yet mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
not PD-India until 2069 or so mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
not available for PD-India until 60 years after the death of photographer mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Please delete this .pdf version. An identical Internet Archive djvu derivation was uploaded by User:Ineuw without the Google logo. This .pdf copy will not be used on Wikisource. — Ineuw 22:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis for that file. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Not PD-India until 2069 mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Not PD-INDIA until 2069 at the earliest mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
it had no link Maitlandplace (talk) 22:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I've uploaded this file when we were discussing the Hebrew version for the new logo. We've elected our logo and this file is now redundant and can be removed. Tamuz (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR: --JuTa 09:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
{{Delete |reason=Microsoft Windows screenshot |subpage=File:Windows 8.1 Blue.jpg |day=13 |month=September |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.253.195.97 (talk • contribs) 2013-09-13T20:31:33 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work by user blocked at enwp. See http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=Mitchydoo&blocks=true Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Most likely grabbed from http://franzupdates.blogspot.de/2009/09/september-photo-update.html (09.2009, "Alex [= Alex Kaprano, as indicated] had a new twitter profile picture (...)") = http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/8330/wink.jpg (last modified: 09.2009). Gunnex (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
URV von http://www.yogihari.com/ Talinee (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Doubt 'own work', out of scope of WLM 2013 and 'advertisement'. Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Quote: Copyright reasons, the user who upload it, make a mistake and upload it on commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Κωνσταντίνος13 (talk • contribs) 2013-09-10T19:34:55 (UTC)
--JuTa 20:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Still screenshot from maps.soso.com? Liangent (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport
[edit]No FOP in France. No possible date of undeletion as yet.
- File:2007 CDG airport Paris.jpg
- File:CDG 1 (8059088888).jpg
- File:CDG 2 (8062559033).jpg
- File:Paris - CDG (4137442830) (2).jpg
- File:Paris - Charles de Gaulle (Roissy) (CDG - LFPG) AN0352153.jpg
- File:Paris - Charles de Gaulle (Roissy) (CDG - LFPG) AN0352379.jpg
- File:Paris - Charles de Gaulle (Roissy) (CDG - LFPG) AN1426201.jpg
- File:Paris Charles-de-Gaulle (8625515731) (2).jpg
- File:Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport 13 December 2007.jpg
- File:Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport.jpg
- File:Tour Sud CDG.jpg
- File:Vigie Trafic Tour Sud.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(CDG_-_LFPG)_AN0352153.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(CDG_-_LFPG)_AN0352379.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(CDG_-_LFPG)_AN1426201.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 17:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Hard to catch these in advance, thanks for the housekeeping on this batch. --Fæ (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in France. No possible date of undeletion as yet.
- File:Airport cdg t1 h4.jpg
- File:Airport cdg t1 into.jpg
- File:Airport cdg t1 intr.jpg
- File:Airport cdg t1 reclaim.jpg
- File:Airport cdg t1tubes.jpg
- File:CDG Terminal 1 P1200586.jpg
- File:CDG Terminal 1 P1200590.jpg
- File:CDG Terminal 1 P1200591.jpg
- File:Patis CDG-1 12.JPG
- File:Roissy CDG1.JPG
russavia (talk) 17:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in France. No possible date of undeletion as yet.
- File:CDG 2F dsc06218.jpg
- File:CDG 2F DSC08327.JPG
- File:CDG airport terminal.jpg
- File:CDG Terminal 2F.JPG
- File:Charles de Gaulle International Airport 01.JPG
- File:Charles de Gaulle International Airport T2 01.JPG
- File:Charles de Gaulle International Airport Terminal 2 DSC00275.jpg
- File:Charles de Gaulle International Airport, terminal 2F in 2004.jpg
- File:CharlesDeGaulle2F.jpg
- File:France Airport, International Wing.JPG
- File:Paris - Charles de Gaulle (CDG) Airport.jpg
- File:Paris CDG Termial 2E 11.jpg
- File:Paris CDG Termial 2E 17.jpg
- File:Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport Terminal E a.JPG
- File:Paris Charles-de-Gaulle Terminal 2F (8625516607) (2).jpg
- File:ParisCDG Term02a.jpg
- File:Roissy Terminal 2.JPG
- File:Terminal à Roissy.jpg
_Airport.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Philipp Johann Heinrich Fauth
[edit]Evidence of pre-1923 publication missing. Unless published before 1923, the images are protected by copyright in the United States. One image was first published in 1936, and the copyright to that image expires in USA on 1 January 2032. Some of the images are sourced to a publication from 1950 which was published after the author's death. If that was the first time they were published, then the copyright to those images expires in the United States on 1 January 2046.
- File:Fauth Bullialdus.png
- File:Fauth Clavius.png
- File:Fauth Gassendi.png
- File:Fauth Mare Nectaris.png
- File:Fauth Mare Serenitatis.png
- File:Fauth-triesnecker-hyginus.svg
- File:Fauth-Triesnecker-Hyginus.tif
Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files of Pablo.javiermilano.416
[edit]- File:GEE 86 EN DOCK SUD.jpg
- File:Tren inaugural a gral urquiza.jpg
- File:CNR CITIC EN PIEDRAS.jpg
- File:PERU CON ILUMINACION HISTORICA.jpg
- File:PRIMER ENTRADA A ESTACION PERU.jpg
- File:PERU GALERIA METROVIAS HISTORIA.jpg
- File:ENTRADA ANTIGUA A LA ESTACION PERU.jpg
- File:PZA DE MAYO 1913.jpg
- File:BOCA ANTIGUA ESTACION PROVISORIA BOEDO.jpg
- File:BOCA ANTIGUA DE ESTACION AV LA PLATA LINEA A.JPG
- File:GENERAL ELECTRIC BOLIVAR.jpg
- File:SUBTE GE EN BOEDO.jpg
Low quality images, without license, or copied from internet. The user who uploaded the photos, Pablo.javiermilano.416, has been blocked by multiple accounts abuse and copyright violation. --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced & undated images about Portuguese Army officers and aviation pioneers. Unlikely to be "own work". Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. File:José Manuel Sarmento de Beires.jpg = en:Sarmento de Beires (1892-1974), File:Manuel Gouveia.jpg = ?, File:António Jacinto da Silva Brito Paes.jpg = pt:Brito Paes (1884-1934). Eventually {{PD-anon-1923}} but without further details...
- File:José Manuel Sarmento de Beires.jpg
- File:Manuel Gouveia.jpg
- File:António Jacinto da Silva Brito Paes.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ElenapezziBO06 (talk · contribs)
[edit]False claimof Own work, especially the Quality Label logos, screenshots, and data table. File:Ambasciatori eTwinning.jpg is previously published here. 'Note to the uploader: SOme of these files may be acceptable on Wikimedia Commons with the correct author, source, and license.
- File:Quality Label.jpg
- File:QL italiano.gif
- File:Griglia valutazione per QL.jpg
- File:Gadgets.jpg
- File:Learning Event.jpg
- File:Conferenza europea Lisbona 2013.jpg
- File:Seminario eTwinning.jpg
- File:Ambasciatori eTwinning.jpg
- File:Portale italiano.PNG
Senator2029 15:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Melissa Lisbeth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RMNORIEGABMS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Screambassist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like promo photos, not own work.
- File:Michael "Padge" Paget.jpg
- File:Michael "Moose" Thomas.jpg
- File:Jason "Jay" James.jpg
- File:Mattew "Matt" Tuck.jpg
- File:AxeWound Band F*ck.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shyam bahadur sunari magar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Krishna pauroti.jpg
- File:Kuber singh rana magar.jpg
- File:Lakhanthapamagar.jpg
- File:Anup prakash.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Wrong license. This foto was not taken in U.S.--Δαβίδ (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- IP vandal Δαβίδ
You can see this look at the history page of the file
and my talk page
User_talk:Vahram_Mekhitarian#IP_vandalism
He is only concerned with the fact that in every way prevents the creation of articles on "Armenian Eternity sign" (Arevahach) in English, Russian, Armenian and other wikis. Therefore, puts on the removal of files from the Category:Armenian Eternity Sign. The editors of these articles are well aware of this vandal.
Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 05:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Created and very likely published in 1908 - PD Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Ancient Armenian King Tigran II the Great Artashessian 4th BDC Mkrtich Aslanian Lighter.jpg
[edit]
Unknown license, possible copivio from here. Wrong license. Δαβίδ (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- IP vandal Δαβίδ
You can see this look at the history page of the files
and my talk page
User_talk:Vahram_Mekhitarian#IP_vandalism
He is only concerned with the fact that in every way prevents the creation of articles on "Armenian Eternity sign" (Arevahach) in English, Russian, Armenian and other wikis. Therefore, puts on the removal of files from the Category:Armenian Eternity Sign. The editors of these articles are well aware of this vandal.
Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the file (uploaded in 08.2013) is sourced with http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iIeZKWcZ4BY/UbzFwi7k1-I/AAAAAAAAPl8/4D1KfWzPILs/s1600/IoBMkU99vss.jpg and behind this is http://falangeoriental.blogspot.de/2013/06/blog-post_8935.html (06.2013). Additionally the file is configured with author = "Mkrtich Aslanian" = apparently not the uploader Vahram Mekhitarian. The above blog itself emphasizes copyright restrictions adding "с) Falange Oriental, 2005-...." to the bottom of that page. Resuming: Derivated & retouched work of a photo taken by "Mkrtich Aslanian" which needs permission via COM:OTRS and with this unlikely
{{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}by Vahram Mekhitarian. In other words: without permission = Delete. Or did I miss here something? Alerting to the uploader: {{FoP-Armenia}} is NOT a license... Gunnex (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Gunnex, yes, I am a new user and do not know what FoP-Armenia is not a license. I thought that as part of the license, the element of the panorama is free to use. In any case, I not upload the source, Im upload as a result of digital synthesis from the element of panorama. It is hard to imagine that my work is the same as what is seen in the photo. You know better than to consider my work, but it's certainly not a copy of the author's work. Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear (c) status, uploader probably not creator. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
COPIVIO, [2].-- Δαβίδ (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- IP vandal Δαβίδ
You can see this look at the history page of the files
and my talk page
User_talk:Vahram_Mekhitarian#IP_vandalism
He is only concerned with the fact that in every way prevents the creation of articles on "Armenian Eternity sign" (Arevahach) in English, Russian, Armenian and other wikis. Therefore, puts on the removal of files from the Category:Armenian Eternity Sign. The editors of these articles are well aware of this vandal.
Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah? and how it relates to copyright laws?--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Completing a malfomed DR. --JuTa 09:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded with no permission from http://www.forumancientcoins.com/armeniannumismatics/Erivan.html done without permission, not free domain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.127.253.12 (talk • contribs) 2013-09-13T22:45:39 (UTC)
Keep. This palace was destroyed in 1914. The photo was made untill this data and published as a postcard of Russian Empire. PD-old. --Interfase (talk) 09:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- {{PD-old}} means that the photographer died before 1943, of which we have no evidence. Try {{PD-RusEmpire}} instead. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. {{PD-RusEmpire}} works here. --Interfase (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- This site says 1917. Geagea (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe there's a mistake. Actually I din't know who is an author of this words on from yhis site. But N. Miklashevskaya in her article "Artists of the 19th century Mirza Kadym Erivani and Mir Mohsun Navvab" (in Russian, book "Art of Azerbaijan", Baku, 1954, page 88) says that this palace was destroyed in 1914, and the portraits of Erivani were removed from the walls of the palace. --Interfase (talk) 07:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's definitely a Postcards of the Russian Empire, and the photo taken in the early 20th century. Geagea (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe there's a mistake. Actually I din't know who is an author of this words on from yhis site. But N. Miklashevskaya in her article "Artists of the 19th century Mirza Kadym Erivani and Mir Mohsun Navvab" (in Russian, book "Art of Azerbaijan", Baku, 1954, page 88) says that this palace was destroyed in 1914, and the portraits of Erivani were removed from the walls of the palace. --Interfase (talk) 07:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- This site says 1917. Geagea (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. {{PD-RusEmpire}} works here. --Interfase (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Please delete these photos from my website on Wikipedia. They are scans or photographs of original postcards, and the image including those with writing belongs to me, I took the photos and they are my property. You do not have permission to use photos taken by me and use them on your website. Does not matter how old a postcard is. You are welcome to go find and buy your own and make those images, but please don't steal and rip off my intellectual property. 67.84.69.128 19:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Also, re-reading this page there is no evidence this was published in Russia before 1914, this is only a postcard with a Russian language caption. 67.84.69.128 19:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- This image taken with scanner ("CanoScan LiDE 100"). And it is a postcard from the period of the Russian Empire. We have more of them in Commons. I do not quite understand which rights you are clam of. Geagea (talk) 00:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept, the file is in public domain. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tofik Bakhramov Stadium
[edit]FOP in Azerbaijan does not allow commercial use of images of copyrighted works including architectural works.
- File:Azerbaijan - Wales 2009 fans.jpg
- File:Azerbaijan - Wales 2009.jpg
- File:Fans of Eintracht Frankfurt in Baku.ogv
- File:Fans of Karabakh Agdam in Baku.ogv
- File:Fans of Karabakh FK 2.jpg
- File:Karabakh vs Eintracht 22 August 2013.png
- File:Neftchi - Inter.jpg
- File:Stadion Bahramova.jpg
- File:Stadion Bakhramova chast.JPG
- File:Stadion Tofika Bakhramova.jpg
- File:The wave in Tofik Bakhramov Stadium.ogv
- File:Tofik Bahramov Stadium, Karabakh vs Eintracht.jpg
- File:Tofiq Bahramov Stadium 2013.jpg
- File:Tofiq Bahramov Stadium's view.jpg
- File:Tofistadium.tight.jpg
- File:View of Tofik Bahramov Stadium.png
LGA talkedits 09:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Is all architectural work copyrighted or is there any needed Threshold of originality? Most of the shown architecture does not seem that original. --Don-kun (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep no "artistic creativity" in those images. Maybe File:Tofiq Bahramov Stadium's view.jpg are borderline case, but again it's very generic image -Justass (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- There does not appear to be any test of "artistic creativity" for copyright protection in Azerbaijan. LGA talkedits 22:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep All these foty shot myself. Authors of my pics I am myself. -Nicat49 (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Strong keep per Nicat. Why photos must be deleted, if person shot it without breaking any Wiki laws?--Alakbaroff (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep--Urek Meniashvili (talk) 06:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per Justass. Most of these photos were made by me. They don't show this architectural work. I tried to show fans in the stadium. --Interfase (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- All of them can be uploaded at enwp where architectural works are free to take, but there it is clear that there is no FOP in Azerbaijan and these are of architectural work. We can't just ignore that at commons.LGA talkedits 22:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep most of the pictures have de-minimus presentation of objects in scope of FOP. Probably, only File:Tofiq Bahramov Stadium's view.jpg is subject to deletion, no other images include enough copyrighted material to be deleted rubin16 (talk) 09:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- To address the claims of "Threshold of originality", if you consult this English version of the Azerbaijan copyright law you will see that unlike the US there does not appear to be any threshold for copyright protection in Azerbaijan the same is true for clams of lack of "artistic creativity" and that Article 3.5 states that "architectural works located in the territory of Republic of Azerbaijan" are in copyright scope; Article 6 further expands on what is protected "works of architecture, urban planning and park and garden design". Article 17 provides for a personal use exception but that does not allow upload here. The precautionary principle applies and they should be removed. LGA talkedits 22:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Commons:De minimis: "Civil Law countries may not apply the de minimis principle as set out above, but often have some alternative legal mechanism whereby similar trivial infringements can be ignored." That's the case rubin16 (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Key to that is "often" the Azerbaijan copyright law does not appear to give such a protection. Secondly these are not trivial representations. LGA talkedits 10:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- I can't say exactly about all the law system of Azerbaijan but assuming it derives from the same USSR basis and has no significant deviations from ex-USSR countries - we definitely can apply de minimis in the same way as in Russia. Though there is no directly stated de minimis concept in Russian law, there is no legal punishment for images where copyrighted objects are used in minimal scope. rubin16 (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Can we have a link to verify that as there is nothing on the COM:DM about ex-USSR countries. Again for example the inclusion of the stadium in File:View of Tofik Bahramov Stadium.png is in no way either trivial or incidental to the picture. LGA talkedits 21:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with this picture, too. If I would find some source about DM in USSR - I'll provide it here, but it comes from my experience of working with files here and in ru.wiki rubin16 (talk) 08:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Can we have a link to verify that as there is nothing on the COM:DM about ex-USSR countries. Again for example the inclusion of the stadium in File:View of Tofik Bahramov Stadium.png is in no way either trivial or incidental to the picture. LGA talkedits 21:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- I can't say exactly about all the law system of Azerbaijan but assuming it derives from the same USSR basis and has no significant deviations from ex-USSR countries - we definitely can apply de minimis in the same way as in Russia. Though there is no directly stated de minimis concept in Russian law, there is no legal punishment for images where copyrighted objects are used in minimal scope. rubin16 (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Key to that is "often" the Azerbaijan copyright law does not appear to give such a protection. Secondly these are not trivial representations. LGA talkedits 10:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, there is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaidzhan. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
The artist, Mr. Olvera died in 1969. Is this painting copyright free...or would it be copyright free if it was in a museum? I just passed it since the flickr license is OK. Leoboudv (talk) 00:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC) The picture was made by his son, who shows it on flickr under the right license. --RocioIsabelRamos (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
![03:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/15#c-Leoboudv-2013-09-15T00:06:00.000Z-File:"Voz_del_Pueblo,_Voz_de_Dios".jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Safe to assume the son (=Flickr user) has the (c) now. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
![02:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/15#c-Hedwig_in_Washington-2013-09-30T02:26:00.000Z-File:"Voz_del_Pueblo,_Voz_de_Dios".jpg){kind=link}
Fork from File:SOSO街景视图覆盖地区.png with altered watermark and updated data. Already merged back with all watermark removed. Liangent (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:SOSO街景覆盖地区.png Liangent (talk) 08:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate already deleted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Probably a coyright violation. Qwertyus (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- No, this is a {{PD-textlogo}} - Jcb (talk) 22:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Textlogo, but out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Apparently TV Brasil is a little bit exaggerating in his CC BY 3.0-declaration via {{TV Brasil}}, as supposed images from TV Brasil already circulated in internet before. See e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by TV Brasil.
This image of a Brazilian actor was taken per exif of http://celebslists.com/images/bruno-garcia-04.jpg in 2006. en:TV Brasil was founded in 12.2007. That alone is confusing enough. Additionally, the source http://tvbrasil.ebc.com.br/semcensura/episodio/ator-bruno-garcia-no-sem-censura seems to be from 04.2011 (see also file path of - high res version - http://www.tvbrasil.org.br/novidades/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/bruno-garcia.jpg = last modified: 26.04.2011, identical exif) but there is enough similar material which was previously published in the internet, including the original frame of the photo = http://www.onordeste.com/administrador/personalidades/imagemPersonalidade/49ee8ed2f024f67b6607ad281953c05c232.jpg (last modified: 2010) or http://www.sitesnobrasil.com/imagens-fotos/homens/b/bruno-garcia9.JPG (last modified: 2009)
For me it looks like that the actor Bruno Garcia supplied TV Brasil with a photo of himself under unknown conditions to promote TV Brasil´s show "Sem censura", where Bruno Garcia was presented.
Resuming: Permission from the photographer of Bruno Garcia needed and unlikely work of TV Brasil. Gunnex (talk) 15:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- A foto, obviamente, foi doada pelo Bruno Garcia à TV Brasil. O site "http://tvbrasil.ebc.com.br/" não divulgaria uma imagem se ele não tivesse permissão para tal. Para todos os efeitos, esta imagem faz parte do acervo da TV Brasil. Abraço.--Juniorpetjua (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- "(...) foi doada" (= was donated) --> see above: "under unknown conditions" = the right to publish the donated image under a CC-license? Unlikely/no evidence. Permission needed. "(...) não divulgaria uma imagem se ele não tivesse permissão para tal." ([TV Brasil] would not release a picture without permission). Did you read Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by TV Brasil? Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
No information on the source and authorship (and hence copyright status) of these paintings or drawings. The uploader's claim that he created them himself seems dubious to say the least, given the uploader's history. Originally tagged as missing source information, but the uploader blanked out the problem tag. —LX (talk, contribs) 02:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deletion eh? ?
[edit]
Hello , thankyou for patrolling new files in wikimedia but seems this File:Filipino Traditonal Fashion Timeline.jpg is my SELF-MADE image, and i have my OWN copyright to that ! you must check the Name over the lower left ok, i made that by ALL BY MY SELF as also to the other files i made, so but it seems u tag this to a delete? what do you want to know about the copy right ? this is an Original file. --Thanks Philipandrew 1:33,15 September 2013(UTC)
- The question here is. You may mounted the image but did you also painted the figures? Per File:Visayans 3.png (dated 1595, part of the image) obviously not. This is a collage needing 2 more freely licensed sources. Gunnex (talk) 21:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The Point (Boxer Codex Disclaiming statement)
[edit]
Yeah im not painted that but does not mean that we cant Modify some to produce an Information right so im not claiming that File:Visayans 3.png figures, i made a collage-TYPE diagrams what do you mean i need to meet Gobernor-General Luis Pérez das Mariñas to seek for his Authority and have a extra copyright ???? well then seek a Time machine and gethim back 600 years! .. its just a modified Diagram, For Produce Free-knowlage that Informing and reliable MODIFICATION! and make us proud.
you know i find an Evolution of Kimono of japan in a Chart form. so i decided to make a Filipino version to stand as a Proud citizen, so as long it is a Self-Made Collages / diagrams and again Im not claiming the Boxer codex cause its written in 1500's , and it is have a copyright then its ok, and it is more Informative,For Filipino's or non- Filipinos, Be Proud and not ashamed/Delete a Fact. philipandrew (talk) 21:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Licensing incorrect. Uploader had plenty of time to fix and provide correct sources. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Old map, substituted by a better .svg version (File:Roma mappa rete tranviaria.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No svg vs. png deletions Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Poorly licensed and incorrectly described. A better version has been uploaded and has been used in most wiki pages. Jeromesandilanico (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's exactly the same file, only with bigger transparent borders. EXACTLY. Excactly the same license is used. EXACTLY. Incorrectly described? No. Poorly licensed? No. And it's the same resolution - SVG files are scalable to any size - so there is no "better resolution". I could even say that the image from you is copied from me. (File:Galaxy Note 3 logo.svg) Speedy keep! --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep and close as an abusive deletion request. He tried edit warring this version of the logo into the actual article with the same claims.. ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete! My version of the svg logo is Not a copy of his as evident by the source I derived the file with. Its not only him who can make an svg file. I did not engage in edit wars with anyone and we just talked about it. I did not do it abusively, in fact it was TheMostAmazingTechnik who is harassing and abusing me with the deletion of all the images i uploaded by even though it was properly licensed under creative commons in flickr via the uploader with permission.Jeromesandilanico (talk) 02:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep and close as an abusive deletion request. He tried edit warring this version of the logo into the actual article with the same claims.. ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- If the software is copyrighted (and it is) and you simply relicense that, you can't use that image - the software is still copyrighted. That's what I've learned here and seen on my own images earlier. --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- But if its an image issued by the copyright holder, that's a different story. But still, I don't get why you're being so hostile about this. And by the way, there is no speedy deletion policy on Commons (its merely "proposed"). ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- If the software is copyrighted (and it is) and you simply relicense that, you can't use that image - the software is still copyrighted. That's what I've learned here and seen on my own images earlier. --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Folks! Relax! No reason given for deletion. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
very poor quality, superseded by File:Flag of Trentino-South Tyrol.svg Ricordisamoa 17:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: svg vs png but very poor, unusable png file Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Royal Bafokeng Stadium
[edit]works of architecture are covered by copyright in South Africa an there is no FOP for photos in South Africa see COM:FOP#South Africa
- File:Bafokeng.jpg
- File:FIFA World Cup 2010 USA Ghana.jpg
- File:Royal Bafokeng Stadium, Phokeng.jpg
- File:Royal Bafokeng Stadium.jpg
- File:U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg
LGA talkedits 00:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I fail to understand why you continue to nominate for deletion pictures clearly illustrating matches and not stadium architecture. File:FIFA World Cup 2010 USA Ghana.jpg clearly shows an American player scoring a goal in this stadium, and File:U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg shows American and Ghanese players before the game (by the way, do you really think that U.S. State Department is violating US FOP laws?) — NickK (talk) 00:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is only South African law that is the issue as US copyright law does not protect buildings, all of these can be uploaded to enwp as {{FoP-USonly|South Africa}} with no restriction. The file File:The U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg contains nothing of the stadium and is fine. LGA talkedits 00:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Anyway, it's very strange to see a US State Department image on COM:DR. I do agree that File:The U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg is fine, but I am speaking of File:U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg which shows American and Ghanese players and a small part of the stadium with hardly any architectural features, only a part of the stand completely like any other stand on a multi-use stadium, and File:FIFA World Cup 2010 USA Ghana.jpg which shows a moment of the game with, once again, a part of the stadium in the background without focusing on any architectural features — NickK (talk) 01:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I won't oppose any deletion, but just my few 2c here, since I uploaded File:U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg; it was not meant to illustrate the place, just the match, of course :) --Elitre (talk) 11:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Anyway, it's very strange to see a US State Department image on COM:DR. I do agree that File:The U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg is fine, but I am speaking of File:U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg which shows American and Ghanese players and a small part of the stadium with hardly any architectural features, only a part of the stand completely like any other stand on a multi-use stadium, and File:FIFA World Cup 2010 USA Ghana.jpg which shows a moment of the game with, once again, a part of the stadium in the background without focusing on any architectural features — NickK (talk) 01:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is only South African law that is the issue as US copyright law does not protect buildings, all of these can be uploaded to enwp as {{FoP-USonly|South Africa}} with no restriction. The file File:The U.S. Plays Ghana in World Cup Match.jpg contains nothing of the stadium and is fine. LGA talkedits 00:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Some Kept, some deleted: Rationale: Deleted images: No FOP in South Africa. Kept images:No stadium visible or the stadium is de minimis --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Soccer City
[edit]works of architecture are covered by copyright in South Africa an there is no FOP for photos in South Africa see COM:FOP#South Africa
- File:Inside Bowl of Soccer City Stadium.jpg
- File:Soccer City Stadium 2010.jpg
- File:Soccer City Stadium at night.jpg
- File:Soccer City Stadium johannesburg, South Africa.jpg
- File:Soccer City Stadium Johannesburg.jpg
- File:Soccer City Stadium.jpg
- File:Soccer-City-Stadium-at-capacity.jpg
- File:South Africa-Johannesburg-Soccer City003.jpg
LGA talkedits 00:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Some Kept, some deleted: Rationale: Deleted images: No FOP in South Africa. Kept images:No stadium visible or the stadium is de minimis Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Soccer City
[edit]works of architecture, images displayed on stadium screens are covered by copyright in South Africa an there is no FOP for photos in South Africa see COM:FOP#South Africa
- File:FNB Stadium - Soccer City.JPG
- File:Mandela Homenagem Joanesburgo.JPG
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-10.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-12.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-14.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-15.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-16.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-17.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-18.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-6.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-7.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-8.jpg
- File:Mandela-Memorial-FNB- 2013-12-10-9.jpg
- File:Rain at FNB Stadium 1.jpg
- File:Soccer-City-Stadium-at-capacity.jpg
LGA talkedits 07:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the deletion request is nonsense. FOP it only essential by Works of Art. No Work of Art, no problem whe havent FOP in South Africa.--Bobo11 (talk) 19:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- +1 Keep --— Allrounder (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not the case, copyright also covers architecture. Have a read of COM:FOP#South Africa LGA talkedits 19:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
There is no FOP in South Africa -FASTILY 21:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Soccer City
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Africa.
- File:FNB Stadium 2014-11-08.jpg
- File:FNB Stadium aerial view - Panoramio (cropped).jpg
- File:FNB Stadium Arrial View - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:FNB Stadium Arrial View - panoramio.jpg
- File:Fnb stadium.jpg
- File:Soccer City - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and similar previous listings regarding same building. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
works of architecture are covered by copyright in South Africa an there is no FOP for photos in South Africa see COM:FOP#South Africa
- File:Outside Soccer City before South Africa & Mexico match at World Cup 2010-06-11 1.jpg
- File:Soccer City 2010 jun 10 1.jpg
- File:Soccer City 2010 jun 10 2.jpg
- File:Soccer City 2010 jun 10 3.jpg
- File:Soccer City during World Cup 2010-06-10.jpg
- File:Soccer City during World Cup 2010-06-23.jpg
- File:Soccer City during World Cup 2010-07-03.jpg
- File:SoccerCity.jpg
- File:World Cup volunteers in Johannesburg 2010-06-28 6.jpg
LGA talkedits 00:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Some Kept, some deleted: Rationale: Deleted images: No FOP in South Africa. Kept images:No stadium visible or the stadium is de minimis Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Quote: Image of a MIDI file isn't possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyacinth (talk • contribs) 2013-09-12T09:13:25 (UTC)
--JuTa 19:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Images standing in for undepictable concepts are called icons. Look it up. -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. whym (talk) 02:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
No FOP for sculpturesin Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Not sculpture.This is a scientific reconstruction on display in a research/teaching institution with no restriction on photography.Does FOP apply in this case? Notafly (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ehm, how does this being a scientific restoration exclude it from being a sculpture? FunkMonk (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hopefully (or it would be useless from a scientific viewpoint there is no creative content).This is a technical work albeit of high aesthetic appeal and not a work of art.Keeping this image would surely help both the technician and the University of Pisa. I hope you can.Notafly (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- There is no distinction. A sculpture made after a living deer is still an artistic sculpture. A painting of a living deer is still a painting. And in this case, even more artistic input had to be made, since its external features are unknown. Naturalism is still art in spite of being well, naturalistic. FunkMonk (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader says that «Keeping this image would surely help both the technician and the University of Pisa.» In that case having their permission in writing (see COM:OTRS) would be possible, yes? -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but I assume the artist would have to be asked. FunkMonk (talk) 05:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Thankyou both for your comments and patience.This (and similar cases) is problematic. The reconstruction is, I hope, a visual expression of a scientific idea. If it is not and simply guesswork (artistic input) then from my standpoint it is worthless. I will e-mail the university. Notafly (talk) 06:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Reconstructions of extinct animals are always more or less guesswork when it comes to anything but the bones. And even then, as mentioned before, a model of a deer made for scientific purposes would still be art. FunkMonk (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep open for a while longer, maybe Notafly will get an answer to his email. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No response to email for over 20 days. We'll revisit the issue if new evidence arises. Until then, COM:PCP FASTILY 07:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The photo was taken in 1927 when the subject was jailed. So the image may be in the public domain in its country of origin (India), but we have no proof it is PD in the United States. Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The copyright in India expires 50 years after publication (if first published before 1941) or 60 years after publication (if first published thereafter). The copyright status in the United States depends on the country of first publication, of which we have no information. If it was first published in India, and if the first publication was before 1941, then it almost certainly satisfies {{PD-1996}}. It was taken around 1927 (according to the image caption in the article on English Wikipedia) or in 1922 (according to the file information page), but when and where was it first published? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I've added the correct pd-permissions: These are PD-India and PD-India-URAA, applies to all photographs published in India before 1941, which this clearly was.Fowler&fowler (talk) 01:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC) On second thoughts, delete his picture, it is small, low res. I will upload a much better picture with the right permissions. Fowler&fowler (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Stefan4. I can't seem to find any information on the first publishing date of this picture, but according to this Indian newspaper report, it was taken secretly by the Lahore jail authorities and was found in the jail records after India and Pakistan's independence in 1947. (Lahore is now in Pakistan.) That means it was not published before 1947, which in turn means PD-India-URAA is not applicable (because for it to apply, the image should have been in the public domain in India by 1996, ie. published in India before 1941, which is not the case). So, please delete from Commons. Fowler&fowler (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [3]. Renamed to File:Bhagat Singh prison photo.jpg. Yann (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=718211648#File:V._A._Sundaram_around_1914.jpg){kind=link}
This image lacks sources and confirmation of the correctness of the shown borders of Slavic and Finno-Ugric tribes. For this reason, this image should be considered as original research. Glavkom NN (talk) 11:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep: It is not the role of Commons to adjudicate on subject-matter disputes - see Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view.
P.S. Reference to source added --Kurgus (talk) 09:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As this map is OR. --HOBOPOCC (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unsourced map of doubtful correctness.--Voevoda (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Although it is not of WikiCommons to judge the historical or scientific accuracy of images, but instead of "prowling" about dozens of articles in different language Wikipedias and discussing about OR there (and it's practically impossible in most cases as not everyone is a highly skilled polyglot), it's better to delete entirely here unsourced, badly sourced or OR images to prevent their spread.--Luboslov Yezykin (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with Luboslov Yezykin. Most lines are false and apparantly drawn by eye. --Koryakov Yuri (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Please alo delete File:Muromian-map.png and cognates. 94.143.246.17 06:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - WLM 2013. and Personality rights warning {{Personality rights}} Kiranravikumar (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Newsflash for WLM people: Wikimedia Commons is not only a cloud to host your little vanity uploads, alright? Concerning this picture:
- It shows no monuments, that’s right, so, instead of wasting admins’ and other users’ time with frivolous DRs, you should have removed the WML tags from the file page.
- Things like {{Personality rights}} should be added to category or file pages, not to the DR.
- This image depics a public event, with journalists and decorated winners; it being not a upskirt show or a nose-picking candid moment, there’s no reason to warn of any personality rights issues.
- Besides, personality rights issues is not a reason for deletion.
- This image shows a timestamp — less lazy editors would have tagged it with {{watermark|timestamp}}.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unused personal image FASTILY 07:32, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:03-045-DCMH_Castillo_de_San_Lorenzo.JPG Susanagon (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep — so the reason for deletion is a link to the image itself? No charoot. (Let me guess: This is about WLM, yes?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: dupe FASTILY 07:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
It says that this is in the public domain in the United States as it was published before 1923. However, there is no evidence that it was published before 1923 or even taken before that year. Verifiable information about the copyright status in the United States is needed.
At w:File:Fauth.jpg, it says that the photographer died more than 100 years ago, but it doesn't say who the photographer is, so there is no way to verify the claim. Verifiable information about the copyright status in Germany is needed. Stefan4 (talk) 22:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note : for the photography NOT to be taken before 1923, Fauth would have to be older than 56 on it, which I think unlikely. The file was used on en.wp before, used as PD, hence my upload. I think it is now PD, however, should the community decide otherwise, it should be moved to a "to be restored at a later date" category (if not PD, it's not far from it). Esprit Fugace (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Taken before 1923 is not the same thing as published before 1923. You will have to show that it was published before 1923. For example, if it was published in a book, then you need to include the book's title, and if it was published in a newspaper, then you need to include the name of the newspaper and the date of publication. The only source information that you have given is a link to a website which was obviously published much later than 1923. The website also doesn't tell where it got the photo from.
- You also have to show that the photo is in the public domain in Germany. Normally, this means that you need to show that the photographer either is anonymous or that he died more than 70 years ago. The photo at [4] looks like a scan of a book or a newspaper. If the person is named in that book or newspaper, then the photographer is not anonymous. Without checking that book or newspaper, we will have to assume that the photographer's name is given in that book or newspaper and that the photographer died less than 70 years ago. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:SOSO街景覆盖地区.png Liangent (talk) 08:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact dup Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Dupe of File:SOSO街景视图覆盖地区图.png Liangent (talk) 10:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:SOSO街景覆盖地区.png Liangent (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate already deleted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Dupe of File:SOSO街景视图覆盖地区图.png Liangent (talk) 10:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Derivative works of political advertising posters that are likely not permanently located in a public place.
- File:060218 ManiSomunaNacio01.jpg
- File:28-F Enganxina.jpg
- File:Cabrils Eleccions Municipals 2008.jpg
- File:Cartells d'Arran.jpg
- File:CUP Cartell 2010 Vilassar Catalonia.jpg
- File:Entesa senat.jpg
- File:Estatut pancarta si.JPG
- File:NO ESTATUT 1.jpg
- File:NO ESTATUT 2.jpg
- File:Pancarta 25-A Sant Feliu de Guíxols Referendum 2010.jpg
darkweasel94 09:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Please read Commons:FOP#Permanent_vs_temporary. Those posters have been sticked in a public place to be there for their full lifetime, therefore they are permanently located there. How long is their lifetime doesn't matter, and those images are covered by FOP.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- That is not what is usual practice on Commons with political posters. If you know that a Spanish court has decided that, please give a citation. Austria has a similar FOP provision and an Austrian court once ruled the opposite in regards to political posters - they are almost always intended to be there for limited time. darkweasel94 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is exactly what our policy Commons:FOP#Permanent_vs_temporary says - and it allows us to keep things like ice statues in FOP countries. Maybe FOP in Austria is different, but if you want to delete those files against our policy, you need to provide an stronger rationale, e.g. showing that Spanish courts rule in the opposite direction, or showing other references. If you think that the usual practice on Commons is not to keep posters permanently displayed in streets in Spain, you should provide links to show it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you search the deletion requests for "advertising poster", you'll find a lot of such decisions. Some examples I filed are Commons:Deletion requests/File:Volksbegehren 003a.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:1-f1030036.jpg. darkweasel94 16:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I see now that you're explicitly saying "in Spain". I don't think I need to provide specific examples of that, because FOP in Spain uses a similar wording to most other FOP countries (including Austria) - so per COM:PCP it is up to you to prove that Spanish case law is different. darkweasel94 16:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- The examples you linked don't have an actual discussion. Other examples I found just discuss German law, and the important point there is that advertising posters are not outside for their full lifetime because they are soon replaced, but most of the files you proposed aren't going to be replaced. In fact, some of them are actually decaying and near the end of their lifetime. Therefore, they have been (or are being) exposed for there full lifetime.
- I see now that you're explicitly saying "in Spain". I don't think I need to provide specific examples of that, because FOP in Spain uses a similar wording to most other FOP countries (including Austria) - so per COM:PCP it is up to you to prove that Spanish case law is different. darkweasel94 16:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you search the deletion requests for "advertising poster", you'll find a lot of such decisions. Some examples I filed are Commons:Deletion requests/File:Volksbegehren 003a.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:1-f1030036.jpg. darkweasel94 16:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is exactly what our policy Commons:FOP#Permanent_vs_temporary says - and it allows us to keep things like ice statues in FOP countries. Maybe FOP in Austria is different, but if you want to delete those files against our policy, you need to provide an stronger rationale, e.g. showing that Spanish courts rule in the opposite direction, or showing other references. If you think that the usual practice on Commons is not to keep posters permanently displayed in streets in Spain, you should provide links to show it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- That is not what is usual practice on Commons with political posters. If you know that a Spanish court has decided that, please give a citation. Austria has a similar FOP provision and an Austrian court once ruled the opposite in regards to political posters - they are almost always intended to be there for limited time. darkweasel94 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you think that Commons policy should be changed to exclude short lived item from FOP, please go to Commons talk:Freedom of panorama and change Commons:FOP#Permanent_vs_temporary after a public debate. Trying to delete files in DR against our policy is not fair.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Except for File:Cartells d'Arran.jpg and File:Cabrils Eleccions Municipals 2008.jpg, all other are works of simple geometry and text, so they cannot be copyrighted.--Coentor (talk) 13:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree, they are quite complex, but if you have precedent decisions from Spain, please cite them. darkweasel94 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you were right that country doesn't matter and that the two deletion requests you linked were good precedents, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Volksbegehren 003a.jpg (the first one you linked) would be enough as a precedent to keep most of the files debated here. In fact File:Volksbegehren 003a.jpg is more original than most of them.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree, they are quite complex, but if you have precedent decisions from Spain, please cite them. darkweasel94 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I have'nt read any discussion, but We have lots of logos in Commons. They are uploaded because they are formed by text or simple geometrical forms, and letters and geometrical forms cannot be copyrighted. I'll look for that discussion, but most of the posters are formed by only text or text with simple logos, so they would fall under the case I metion.--Coentor (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The Spanish Intellectual Property Law in its art.35 says: 1. Cualquier obra susceptible de ser vista u oída con ocasión de informaciones sobre acontecimientos de la actualidad puede ser reproducida, distribuida y comunicada públicamente, si bien sólo en la medida que lo justifique dicha finalidad informativa. Then if the work (i.g poster) its connected to an informative event and the photo have an informative aim, the work can be included freely. --Dvdgmz (talk) 08:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- That sounds like a fair use clause. We don't accept fair use clauses on Commons. darkweasel94 11:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- The Spanish law don't have the concept of "Fair use". This text is in the section "Limits" (Capítulo 2: Límites), what is 'outside' of the copyright protection. This point its the first in the same article of Freedom of panorama text (which is the second). But provably we'll need an expert opinion to delimit if this can be considerate FU or a protection border. --Dvdgmz (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- That sounds like a fair use clause. We don't accept fair use clauses on Commons. darkweasel94 11:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)