Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/09/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Unused and incorrectly named filename. — Ineuw 02:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: move leftover of a recently uploaded file Denniss (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused and incorrectly named filename. — Ineuw 02:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: move leftover of a recently uploaded file Denniss (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused and incorrectly named filename. — Ineuw 02:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: move leftover of a recently uploaded file Denniss (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Please delete this redirect. Incorrect name, file is not yet being used. Requested by the uploader. — Ineuw 21:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: move leftover of a recently uploaded file Denniss (talk) 14:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
coped from the link http://kakkanadanfoundation.com/images/trust/trustees/chathannoor_mohan.jpg Rojypala (talk) 13:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Copyright violation. Sreejith K (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: the copyright is visible at the bottom left of the picture Thomsep (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Copyright to DJ Roller/Liquid Pictures 3D Sreejith K (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Copy of http://www.nr-pro.fr/economie-d-energie/recuperateur-chaleur-groupe-froid-et-certificat-d-economie-d-energie-CEE Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyight violation. JuTa 21:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Für Testzwecke leider falsches Bild ausgesucht. Blade1911 (talk) 16:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative/screenshot Denniss (talk) 12:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fiber products (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission. Watermarks (including Wikipedia logo) doesn't provide any educational value. Also may be out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Mdf adsl splitter.jpg
- File:Mdf splitter.jpg
- File:MDF splitter filter.jpg
- File:1226 VDSL splitter.jpg
- File:1226 VDSL filter.jpg
- File:MDF splitter.jpg
- File:OI adsl splitter with 3U.jpg
- File:ADSL splitter with cable.jpg
- File:Adsl splitter for south America.jpg
- File:OI adsl splitter.jpg
- File:3U gold adsl splitter.jpg
- File:FU gold splitter.jpg
- File:ISDN SPLITTER.jpg
- File:3 M splitter.jpg
- File:UK splitter.jpg
- File:Frach splitter.jpg
- File:2 connectors splitter.jpg
- File:Adsl modem splitter.jpg
- File:VDSL splitter.jpg
- File:Southeast Asia splitter.jpg
- File:Lightning protection adsl splitter.jpg
- File:Lightning protection splitter with cable.jpg
- File:Top sale splitter.jpg
- File:CPE splitter.jpg
- File:South America splitter.jpg
- File:Rj11 rj45 splitter.jpg
- File:D-Link splitter.jpg
- File:Indian splitter.jpg
- File:Splitter adsl.jpg
- File:Phone splitter.jpg
- File:Rj11 connector splitter.jpg
- File:One in one splitter.jpg
- File:Splitter with cable.jpg
- File:Cable line splitter.jpg
- File:Line adsl splitter.jpg
- File:Modem phone splitter.jpg
- File:Adsl splitter with 2 connectors.jpg
- File:2 inductors splitter.jpg
- File:Excellent Optical Fiber Splice Closure.jpg
- File:Gyts optic fiber cable splice closure.jpg
- File:Erect Type Fiber Optical Splice Closure.jpg
- File:Sealed Fiber Optic Splice Closures.jpg
- File:In-line FTTH Optical Fiber Splice Closure.jpg
- File:Fiber optic splice splitter closure.jpg
- File:Hat types Optic Fiber Splice Closure( 3 in 3 out ).jpg
- File:Optical Fiber Splice Closure.jpg
- File:1X4INSERT CASSETTE PLC.jpg
- File:1X32INSERT CASSETTE PLC.jpg
- File:1X16INSERT CASSETTE PLC.jpg
- File:1X4INSERT CASSETTE PLC WITH SC CONNECTOR.jpg
- File:1X8INSERT CASSETTE PLC SPLITTER.jpg
- File:Splice tray.jpg
- File:Fiber optic ports splice tray.jpg
- File:Fiber optic patch panel fiber splice tray.jpg
- File:Optical fiber splice tray.jpg
- File:12 port fiber optic splice tray.jpg
- File:24 port fiber optic splice tray.jpg
- File:Fiber optic splice tray.jpg
- File:8 port fiber optic splice tray.jpg
- File:ABS PLC splitter.jpg
- File:MM Double Windows FBT Splitter.jpg
- File:FBT MM SPLITTER.jpg
- File:INSERT CASSETTE 1*8PLC SPLITTER.jpg
- File:1X64CASSETTE PLC SPLITTER.jpg
- File:1X32CASSETTE PLC SPLITTER.jpg
- File:1X16MICRO PLC SPLITTER.jpg
- File:1X16CASSETTE PLC SPLITTER.jpg
- File:YXBB03007.jpg
- File:YXBB03006.jpg
- File:维基图片.jpg
- File:YXBB03003-2.jpg
- File:YXBB03002-6.jpg
- File:YXBB03002-5.jpg
- File:YXBB03002-3.jpg
- File:YXBB03002-1.jpg
- File:YXBB03002-4.jpg
- File:YXBB03009-4.jpg
- File:YXBB03002-2jpg.jpg
- File:YXBB03009-1.jpg
- File:YXBB03009-2.jpg
- File:YXBB03009-3.jpg
- File:FTTH Fiber Optic Floor Terminal Box.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy: Files uploaded by long term vandal. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Trophy (?) Monument at the bottom seems to pass the threshhold of originality. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep but crop the "trophy", and delete the current image. Everything else is PD. Tbhotch™ 17:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- That would no longer be the "official" logo, but misrepresent it (perhaps outside of scope?) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- My bad, it is a banner but I mistook it as the official logo. Actually in the bottom of the image, it is not the trophy, it is a monument of Buenos Aires which has been represented by a graphical symbol for the 125th IOC Session.Himanis Das talk
10:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for the clarification. Seems it is, however, part of official advertising material to include this information (see example from Copenhagen), so I am still iffy the value of cropping out the monument. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It seems that the confusion regarding the image have been made clear. I reviewed the image, most of the things are PD.Hammer67 (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Hammer, it's OK but I hope a special license it required for that Monument. I would heartily request Crisco to review the license of the image. If possible add or remove any fake or wrong license or information from it, you are fully permitted.Himanis Das talk 16:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Hammer67, the issue of the monument's silhouette being copyrightable (or not?) has yet to be addressed. Your keep !vote is not based on this discussion.
- @Himanis Das: That's a lot of licenses! Trademark and emblem are appropriate (obviously) but not copyright-related tags. PD-OLD is probably not appropriate, as this is from a 2013 meeting and (at the very least the silhouette) dates from that time. The PD-Simple or PD-text depends on whether or not we conclude that the monument's silhouette meets the threshold of originality (according to that page, File:CarCreditCity.png was borderline, so I'm still leaning that it passes the TOO). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: I have removed the {{PD-OLD}} from the image. As u said the monument meets threshold of originality, cropping out only the monument and replacing it may solve the situation, right ?Himanis Das talk 10:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Himanis Das: For Commons, perhaps (and I think that's as far as we could go here). I'm just worried about misrepresenting their banner when this is used on the other projects (Wikipedia, for instance) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492 - One of the great mistake I did before is I forgot to add {{FoP-Argentina}} in that image. The laws of Argentina states that the country has has no "freedom of panorama" provision in its copyright law, neither are buildings mentioned among works to which copyright apply. This is the correct license which will represent the monument. Anyways take a look on that image again.Himanis Das talk 17:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Himanis Das: FOP only applies for photographs of the building proper, and derivative works have their own copyright. Artistic interpretations of the building also attract their own copyright (as has happened here). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Crisco - So what could be done right now ? Shall cropping the monument may save the image from deletion ?Himanis Das talk 12:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Purely from the POV of deletion, crop would be okay. Can't say it would be used on other projects, but the file would likely not be deleted. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Finally I cropped out the monument and uploaded the new one replacing the old, also removed unecessary license information(s). Is it OK Cris ?
- Purely from the POV of deletion, crop would be okay. Can't say it would be used on other projects, but the file would likely not be deleted. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Crisco - So what could be done right now ? Shall cropping the monument may save the image from deletion ?Himanis Das talk
- @Himanis Das: FOP only applies for photographs of the building proper, and derivative works have their own copyright. Artistic interpretations of the building also attract their own copyright (as has happened here). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492 - One of the great mistake I did before is I forgot to add {{FoP-Argentina}} in that image. The laws of Argentina states that the country has has no "freedom of panorama" provision in its copyright law, neither are buildings mentioned among works to which copyright apply. This is the correct license which will represent the monument. Anyways take a look on that image again.Himanis Das talk
- @Himanis Das: For Commons, perhaps (and I think that's as far as we could go here). I'm just worried about misrepresenting their banner when this is used on the other projects (Wikipedia, for instance) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: I have removed the {{PD-OLD}} from the image. As u said the monument meets threshold of originality, cropping out only the monument and replacing it may solve the situation, right ?Himanis Das talk
- Thanks Hammer, it's OK but I hope a special license it required for that Monument. I would heartily request Crisco to review the license of the image. If possible add or remove any fake or wrong license or information from it, you are fully permitted.Himanis Das talk
- Okay, thanks for the clarification. Seems it is, however, part of official advertising material to include this information (see example from Copenhagen), so I am still iffy the value of cropping out the monument. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- My bad, it is a banner but I mistook it as the official logo. Actually in the bottom of the image, it is not the trophy, it is a monument of Buenos Aires which has been represented by a graphical symbol for the 125th IOC Session.Himanis Das talk
- That would no longer be the "official" logo, but misrepresent it (perhaps outside of scope?) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- (outdent) Yes, copyright wise this should be fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
_fighter.png){kind=link}
_and_Arthur_Eric_Williams_his_eldest_son,_Labrador_Development_Company_Ltd,_Port_Hope_Simpson_Tombstone_Llewelyn_Pritchard.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![120 File:ח"כ יפעת קריב.jpg](#File:ח"כ_יפעת_קריב.jpg){kind=link}
![121 File:ח"כ רינה פרנקל.jpg](#File:ח"כ_רינה_פרנקל.jpg){kind=link}
![134 File:Aimé Venel peignant le triptyque "Pour le chant des oiseaux".jpg](#File:Aimé_Venel_peignant_le_triptyque_"Pour_le_chant_des_oiseaux".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: Hid the original version, kept the cropped one. The graphic symbol probably has a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be a still from a movie. Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Or, perhaps, a DVD cover. In either case it's a copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Was ist das? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zwiadowca21 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment: The right question is «Wer ist sie?» («Who is she?»). I find it incredibly distastefull someone refers a human being as "das" (sort of "it"), and can be so callous and unempathetic as to see a photo of a little girl (offtopic as it may be) and ask, rhethorically, «What is this?». :-( … -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Although the question offends, it is valid -- out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
_fighter.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_fighter.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sourced to http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1960/1960%20-%201060.html which is not necessarily the Uploader as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
_fighter.png){kind=link}
- Delete - there was, once, an agreement with the FlightGlobal folks that image from their PDF archives could be uploaded under the CC-BY-SA license. That's since been declared not to be valid for Commons, though, and even if it was this is not the uploader's "own work" - this is, as noted, from FG, and I uploaded the file originally on en.wiki under a fair-use license due due to the fact that the FG license was fishy at the time and has since been determined not to be a valid relicensing. TL;DR - this belongs as fair-use on en.wiki, not free use on Commons. Also the uploader needs a good trouting for both breaking the attribution chain and claiming a copyrighted photo as their own work. - The Bushranger (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: UK magazine -- 1960 date means this will be under copyright for at least another 18 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
_fighter.png){kind=link}
An unused screenshot of a wikipedia editor's user page, out of COM:SCOPE russavia (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Since the article this file was intended for was deleted, this file seems to be out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 09:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Capturedlightning.com/ images
[edit]
This image lacks OTRS permission, and the original permission text by the uploader stated only "uploaded with permission", which is insufficient for Commons. My experience as an OTRS and Commons volunteer tells me that at least 50% of the time when I encounter that text,it means that the uploader didn't actually ask for Creative Commons permission, rather permission to upload to Wikipedia. The strong copyright claim on the website makes the case that we should delete this image based on the precautionary principle if nothing else. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- We received an email on OTRS from the copyright holder for File:Aluminium-can-white.jpg (ticket:2013090810010737); it looks legit at first glance. Trijnsteltalk 13:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. If it's not legitimate, then it's a very good forgery. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Legitimate permission received. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused user pic 91.66.57.190 17:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.66.57.190 19:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
The uploader seems to be uploading a foto of herself. The copyrightstatus is unclear. The foto is to good looking and is not likely to be a picture se made of herself. I think that a professional photographer made this picture so the copyright of this is probadly his. This kan be solved to mail a letter singen to the photographer to commons:OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I believe this violates Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 21:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I didn't know photos of boardgames were against copyright. Happy for this to be deleted if required. Pkapitola (talk) 02:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Struggling for COM:SCOPE with this russavia (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Upload wizard messed up my photo, so I upoaded it without any describtion or attachement to particular group. Please, delete it, so I can reupload it. Gytismenomyletojas (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Please just edit this file -- do not upload it again. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
w:Ben Hall 11.tif ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ben_Hall_c._1862.tif in case it gets deleted) claims this is "Original publication: Ben Hall - Stories from the hard road" which Google Books says was published in 2012. So this needs OTRS. Doublely so because the same person who uploaded it here on the 5th uploaded it to Wikipedia on the 6th under a fair use license, and under "Respect for commercial opportunities" wrote "permission will generally be granted" and added a Wikipedia-only license. Prosfilaes (talk) 19:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
True color GIF (Thumbnail is wrong) and superseded by File:Bolivianoaleman.jpg Sreejith K (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
This is not a monument for WLM 2013 taweethaも (talk) 22:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete because it off scope. That it was uplaoded among WLM stuff is irrelevant for the deletion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 05:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Misspelled image name. Requested by the uploader, minutes after the upload. Thank you. — Ineuw 08:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In the future, please use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
no evidence of permission from university, uploader has a number of copyright issues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tivki 96.41.28.46 05:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot of a likely copyright interface. russavia (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks like advertisement, not own work. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
It is not clear where this was taken, however none of the likely locations have FOP rules that would allow for this image South Africa as hosts or Spain as winners. Secondly US FOP also does not cover this, so I cant see how this can be a Free image that can be hosted here.
Fair use may be available at projects that allow for it. LGA talkedits 00:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Image is DW of Cup. As LGA says, FOP cannot apply. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
This looks like cover art, so I'm skeptical it's the uploaders own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
There are other photos in Category:Dean Barrow which can be used in place of this extremely low quality image russavia (talk) 11:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: This is only a little worse than the rest. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Photograph unknown - how the Uploader knows, that the photographer was dying before 1943 or earlier? Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I do not know. But the photo is older than 1986 which is the date of being public domain in Egypt. Plus the date of the magazine is 1928.--Ashashyou (talk) 01:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- In Eastern Arabic figures--Ashashyou (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: PD Egypt -- 20 years . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Photograph unknown - how the Uploader knows, that the photographer was dying before 1942 or earlier? Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I do not know. But the photo is older than 1986 which is the date of being public domain in Egypt.--Ashashyou (talk) 01:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've changed the PD-old template to {{PD-Egypt}}, which might be more appropriate, but still needs verification. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- How to verify the photo?--Ashashyou (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Initially had a speedy, but I (uploader) think discussion is in order. Photo comes from a CC news video, but appears to have been made in the 1970s. May require additional verification. Froggerlaura (talk) 03:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- ABC News will usually credit the photographer if the photo is not one of their own or from the AP. Since Nyad is not credited, I don't think it is one of her photos. It is probably an ABC (they have been around since 1945) file photo from her 1979 swimming record, but this is not stated. Froggerlaura (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- The video is actually the property of ABC News, whose official YouTube channel is here and whose videos are copyrighted. This channel just appears to be reuploading them with improper licenses. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: ABC copyright . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE russavia (talk) 14:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Clearly copyrighted material. К сожалению, тут никаких вариантов нет - оформление охраняется законом об авторких правам ещё 70 лет после смерти автора. Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Это фотография с музея. Если никто не просил удалять из авторов, зачем тогда ее удалять. И что именно охраняется авторским правом? --Visem (talk) 19:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Более или менее всё охраняется - сами материалы и композиция стендов, а также устройство интерьеров. То, что фотография из музея, к сожалению, не делает её свободной - так же, как нельзя, например, прийти, сфотографировать картину Сальвадора Дали, а потом загрузить её сюда - так как права на неё принадлежат наследником Дали, и будут им принадлежать до 2060-х годов.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Композицию стендов делали люди, которые мне и показывали музей. Я им сказал о том что буду в Википедии фотографии ставить, они были только рады. Письменное разрешение просить это немного маразм. --Visem (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- К сожалению, закон требует именно письменного разрешения, посланного через службу OTRS.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ну если вдруг кто-то потребует удаления из авторов, тогда удалим, а так зачем удалять если никто не против. --Visem (talk) 09:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- К сожалению, закон требует именно письменного разрешения, посланного через службу OTRS.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Композицию стендов делали люди, которые мне и показывали музей. Я им сказал о том что буду в Википедии фотографии ставить, они были только рады. Письменное разрешение просить это немного маразм. --Visem (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Более или менее всё охраняется - сами материалы и композиция стендов, а также устройство интерьеров. То, что фотография из музея, к сожалению, не делает её свободной - так же, как нельзя, например, прийти, сфотографировать картину Сальвадора Дали, а потом загрузить её сюда - так как права на неё принадлежат наследником Дали, и будут им принадлежать до 2060-х годов.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copvio -- keeping it would require permission from the authors of all the works shown. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Cropped from where? Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- from the commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Osama_Ibrahim.jpg --Ashashyou (talk) 01:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Cropped from where?7 Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- from the commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:31458.jpg --Ashashyou (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Professional photograph of a celebrity @ low resolution, missing exif. Apart from adding the file to an article, this is the only contribution of the user at the wikimedia projects. Probably a copyvio. El Grafo (talk) 09:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I believe this violates Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 21:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I believe this violates Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 21:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I believe this violates Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 21:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
suspect I made a mistake confirming copyright, OverThePeak.com is not photographer's website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earflaps (talk • contribs) 2013-09-04T23:15:30 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks to me like out of scope. JuTa 10:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Scan of a print of an old photograph of ru:Фазлуллин, Мухаметхан Ашрафзянович. Uploader is probably not the creator of the original photograph, so unless we have evidence that the picture is in the public domain we can't keep it. El Grafo (talk) 09:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
SVG was also uploaded today. We only need the superior format. Fry1989 eh? 00:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's hardly a reason to delete this. This is the original version and it is better to keep for future reference in case the SVG is incorrectly rendered (which happens very often). Besides, I haven't read anything about it not being allowed and the SVG is just a derivative and someone else's work. Furthermore, just because another version exists does not make it automatically superior. Again, the original rendering can coexist. --User 50 (talk) 07:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's a perfectly good reason. When we have an SVG image and a PNG is uploaded later, it's almost always deleted. In this case while the PNG was uploaded first, it was only a matter of hours. We have a good SVG, we don't need a scaled down dupe. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's hardly a reason to delete this. This is the original version and it is better to keep for future reference in case the SVG is incorrectly rendered (which happens very often). Besides, I haven't read anything about it not being allowed and the SVG is just a derivative and someone else's work. Furthermore, just because another version exists does not make it automatically superior. Again, the original rendering can coexist. --User 50 (talk) 07:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Continuation of posts --User 50 (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The quality of the SVG is on par with the PNG at native resolution, but far excels at larger resolutions and very small ones. Fear of SVG rendering problems should not keep us from keeping the technically superior image and deleting a single-resolution rendering of it. —Willscrlt ( Talk | w:en | b:en | meta ) 05:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: While we do not generally delete existing PNGs when and SVG is created, we do not keep both if they are simultaneous or the PNG came later. This is essentially simultaneous. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
The image is a scan from a newspaper or other similar source, judging by the granular quality. On en.wiki, the uploader stated that the image was from the 1920s but did not offer any proof of that or proof that the image is PD. In fact they state the copyright holder is Veronica Simon, which differs from the information provided here. Diannaa (talk) 21:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment On English Wikipedia, it says that the photo was taken around 1920. Depending on when it was published in a newspaper, {{PD-1923}} might apply. It would be nice to have the exact date of publication. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Given the unknown dates and the different copyright claims, we would need more information to keep this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
A Film poster - Own work? 91.66.57.190 12:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I believe this violates Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 21:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of a Google page, whilst it only contains text, im not sure it qualifies as simple because its a substantial portion of the page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
My opinion is that the only thing that could be a problem would be the Google Logo and the Google Product Names (because of the trademarks). This is a screenshot of the old Google Help Forums that some years ago switched to the new Google Groups. --Avm99963 (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is enough here for the text itself to have a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused user page image russavia (talk) 14:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be out of scope? El Grafo (talk) 08:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
File:John Osborn Williams owner (foreground) and Arthur Eric Williams his eldest son, Labrador Development Company Ltd, Port Hope Simpson Tombstone Llewelyn Pritchard.jpg
[edit]_and_Arthur_Eric_Williams_his_eldest_son,_Labrador_Development_Company_Ltd,_Port_Hope_Simpson_Tombstone_Llewelyn_Pritchard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Arthur_Eric_Williams_his_eldest_son,_Labrador_Development_Company_Ltd,_Port_Hope_Simpson_Tombstone_Llewelyn_Pritchard.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is treated as non-free at English Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Sir, The map seems to be created without any solid references (historical atlases, descriptions or any kind of charts etc). So, it should be deleted. If the author can give any type of reference, it can be included in the Wikipedia. Currently there is a large number maps without references in Wikipedia India. Common people are often mislead by these charts. PK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof Pilla (talk • contribs) 15:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: There is no rule against Original Research on Commons. We leave the choice of images, including maps, up to the editors of the various WPs and this map is widely used. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
imho advertisemens as well no 'cultural heritage', i.e. out of scope, Roland zh 18:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Crude and useless hoax, with fake person photoshopped into File:Kevin07.jpg Sreejith K (talk) 17:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted movie. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
This is not a monument for WLM 2013 taweethaも (talk) 22:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: No, it is not. But that is not a valid cause for deletion. This is a photo of a baby — remove it from the pages, articles, and categories where it doesn’t belong, remove the misapplied tags, but dont delete the file because of that: A a baby photo, it is a good addition for Commons. (Next time there’s elections for the WMF, I’ll vote for whichever candidate that promises to terminate WLM and other such nonsense.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 05:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE russavia (talk) 14:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
doubtful permission Dudek1337 (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
no licence. Unused personal file McZusatz (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
small personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be either unwanted advertising or copyright violation. El Grafo (talk) 08:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicated file (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Miembros_de_Mercosur.svg) Guillermo Sebastián Donatti 15:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not a duplicate -- this one includes Antarctica . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Also concerning : File:Monument als caiguts de Port-Vendres, vista general.JPG
Architect : Aristide Maillol (1861-1944)
No FOP in France / Pas de liberté de panorama en France Trizek from FR 17:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Aristide Maillol was a sculptor, not an architect. According with Mérimée database his work is the half-lying woman shown in File:Monument als caiguts, Port-Vendres.JPG, but the obelisk and works at his base are dated from 18th century, according with Mérimée: Place de l'Obelisque. So, delete File:Monument als caiguts, Port-Vendres.JPG, but keep File:Monument als caiguts de Port-Vendres, vista general.JPG, as well as related File:Obelisk of Port-Vendres.jpg. --V.Riullop (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 1 and 1 per comment . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
out of focus, uploader request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojk (talk • contribs) 2013-08-20T16:06:32 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
File contains offensive content. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The content is not a reason for deletion -- Commons is not censored. However, we do not keep images of text. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Who is the photographer? Unclear copyright claims over OTRS. Jcb (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
No description + category by a bot = useless. 91.66.57.190 10:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a copy from Facebook, not like an "own work". 91.66.57.190 10:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Self portrait? The uploader's girlfriend? 91.66.57.190 10:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Albert David (1896-1970) is not in public domain. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.44.2.92 17:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
http://www.behbahan-news.ir/article/10363.html Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused, undocumented, badjpg, almost unreadable. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
All picture from this user upploaded on Spet 7 are unfree Yger (talk) 07:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
http://malecelebbio.com/2013/07/09/steve-grand/ Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot with incorrect licensing information. Barney the barney barney (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - Not educationally useful Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Also a DW of many figures . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused eyesore. -- Tuválkin ✉ 03:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Spam; eyesore; unused. -- Tuválkin ✉ 03:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
No source for claim that it was public domain in its home country in 1996; circa 1972 Australian photo would've still been under copyright there. NatGertler (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
As I message you on this: St Kilda and their CMS Officer Communications & Engagement advised me that the Council had no copyright issues with the Mayoral photo
- I am not sure what "no copyright issue" means in this context. If you are saying that they do not claim copyright, it doesn't mean that someone doesn't own copyright in this image. By default, someone does. If it means that they hold copyright but grant permission for use, there are specific licenses that they must grant for the image to be used.--NatGertler (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
It is not clear where in Spain this was taken however FOP in Spain requires the works to be "permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares" it looks like this is inside in a museum and even if it is outside since the World Cup is re-awarded every 4 years this can not be described as permanent so fails FOP. LGA talkedits 01:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep that one. I don't think it's the same case at all, since the focus is not on showing the cups in detail, just the room containing them. In my opinion File:Triplete de España 2.JPG falls under de minimis, unlike the first photo. On the other hand, if the cups are copyrighted, then Delete File:Triplete de España.JPG Lobo (howl?) 11:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- The cups are copyright, they are more then simple designs. De minimis does not apply as the reason for taking the picture is the presence of the cups and they are the combined focus of the image and are not trivial in the image. LGA talkedits 12:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- The presence of the cups, not the cups itselves. "Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject, and is essential to the subject (eg blacking it out would make the file useless) but the work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity, so de minimis may apply." Lobo (howl?) 14:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- DM can not apply to an image where the whole reason for taking it was the presence of the copyright work, the copyright work is the subject of the image. LGA talkedits 23:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- The presence of the cups, not the cups itselves. "Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject, and is essential to the subject (eg blacking it out would make the file useless) but the work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity, so de minimis may apply." Lobo (howl?) 14:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- The cups are copyright, they are more then simple designs. De minimis does not apply as the reason for taking the picture is the presence of the cups and they are the combined focus of the image and are not trivial in the image. LGA talkedits 12:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As LGA says, blacking out the World Cup (maybe all three) would make this image useless. That's the test of DM. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
identical to File:Lululemon Yellow Yoga.jpg, slightly smaller file size Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
copyvio : front page of a french magazine - july 2013 edition. Habertix (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
not in use any longer Servien (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: User-page-specific image, not in COM:SCOPE without actual use. Since the uploader, user page owner, and deletion nominator are all the same user, it's clear that this file will no longer be used. --Closeapple (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Professional photograph of ru:Романов, Артём Витальевич, probably not the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this photo of the modern (2000s) building has to be deleted as there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, российские законы в данный момент не разрешают создание свободных фотографий зданий, если сами здания охраняются авторскими правами - то есть если после смерти архитектора прошло менее 70 лет. Это на юридическом языке называется "отсутствие свободы панорамы". На фотографии изображена мечеть Кул-Шариф в Казанском кремле, построенная в 2000-е годы. Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, has to be deleted as there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, российские законы в данный момент не разрешают создание свободных фотографий зданий, если сами здания охраняются авторскими правами - то есть если после смерти архитектора прошло менее 70 лет. Это на юридическом языке называется "отсутствие свободы панорамы". На фотографии изображена мечеть Кул-Шариф в Казанском кремле, построенная в 2000-е годы. Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately has to be deleted as there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, российские законы в данный момент не разрешают создание свободных фотографий зданий, если сами здания охраняются авторскими правами - то есть если после смерти архитектора прошло менее 70 лет. Это на юридическом языке называется "отсутствие свободы панорамы". На фотографии изображена мечеть Кул-Шариф в Казанском кремле, построенная в 2000-е годы. Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coupe Henri Delaunay
[edit]Freedom of panorama in neither Poland or Ukraine covers these pictures.
- File:Big Henri Delaunay Cup Euro 2012 final.jpg
- File:Euro 2012 qualifying play-offs draw (1).jpg
- File:Puchar UEFA Euro 2012 katowice.jpg
- File:TrophyTour.png
- File:Henri Delaunay Cup, Manufaktura Łódź May 2012.jpg
- File:Henri Delaunay Cup 2, Manufaktura Łódź May 2012.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
LGA talkedits 04:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't get it. It is forbidden to take pictures of this cup? ARvєδuι + 19:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:UEFA Champions League trophy
[edit]Freedom of panorama rules in Germany, Romania, France, Italy do not allow for these pictures.
- File:2001 Champions League.JPG (in Germany)
- File:Cupa Campionilor Europeni 1986.jpg (in Romania)
- File:LC 2.JPG (in France)
- File:LC 3.JPG (in France)
- File:Trophy in Rome.jpg (in Italy)
- File:Uefa champions league borussia dortmund.jpg (in Germany)
- File:UEFA Champions League trophy in Borussia Dortmund museum.jpg (in Germany)
LGA talkedits 04:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:UEFA Champions League trophy
[edit]Freedom of panorama rules in Spain only allow for works "permanently located in parks or on streets" these are indoors and Poland and England only allow it for "are permanently exhibited" they are not.
- File:Copa de campeones museo.jpg (in Spain)
- File:UEFA Champions League trophy (1956-1966).png (in Spain)
- File:UEFA Champions League Trophy Tour 1.jpg (in Poland)
- File:UEFA Champions League Trophy Tour 2.jpg (in Poland)
- File:UEFA Champions League Trophy.JPG (in England)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
LGA talkedits 04:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- DeleteWith regards the photo I took I didn't think of it as sculpture/object d'art when I took it so did not consider the copyright of the trophy when I took it, however there are too few made and impractical to be considered utilitarian, so I guess that it is art however minor, with all that that entails.--KTo288 (talk) 14:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
NeutralThat's really poor because football articles in german wikipedia often use the trophies in club articles to illustrate their success... there is already no illustration of the cup winners cup and the uefa cup anymore, which were used in many articles. But what can you do? Seems like nothing. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- If we accept that the cups are art, and the precedence of previous deletions is that they are, then they have to go however much we would like to keep them.--KTo288 (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:UEFA Champions League trophy
[edit]Freedom of panorama rules in Spain only allow for works "permanently located in parks or on streets" these are indoors
- File:Barcelona 282.JPG
- File:Barcelona 4134.JPG
- File:Barcelona 4135.JPG
- File:Barcelona 4136.JPG
- File:Barselona FK Barselona08.JPG
- File:Barselona FK Barselona09.JPG
LGA talkedits 03:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 17:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bernhardrieder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gastón Casa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
- File:PASANTÍAS PSICOLOGÍA EN OSE - SOC GASTON CASA DIAMANTE.pdf
- File:Curriculum Vitae Soc Gastón Casa Diamante v10 7 2013.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goldenflashes21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Game action.jpg
- File:LCBL Uniforms.jpg
- File:LCBL Hats.jpg
- File:Corps of Discovery Cup.jpg
- File:2013 LCBL All-Star Game.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imperiorstate (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads by this uploader are copyvios, taken from a variety of sources with no evidence of a free licence (let alone PD)
- File:Air Lituanica Logo.png
- File:Air Lituanica Embraer 175.jpg
- File:Air Lituanica destinations.png
- File:Air Lituanica Embraer 170 pirmasis nusileidimas VNO.jpg
- File:Air Lituanica Embraer 170.jpg
russavia (talk) 10:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:AM AoG.jpg
- File:AM AoG2.jpg
- File:Nepal Primary Health Centers AoG.jpg
- File:Mexiko AoG.jpg
- File:Haiti Cholera AoG.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Piękni2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two* of these has incomplete DRs, but this is a new blanket request for the whole lot from this contributor. Let me disclaim I have nothing against Commons hosting images of girls, pretty or otherwise, and looking as they damn please. However there should be no doubt that the photographed subject fully understands and agrees what means to have her likeness hosted in Commons. In some cases selfuploaded portraits are asked to be deleted due to misundertanding of how Commons works, in this case, however, it is even worse: The uploader is the same for 4 different models, all photos suggest different cameras, locations, and origins, and the used description (farcically tagged to be Greek) is «omnomnom» for all images, an onomatopea for tastiness which is quite tasteless in this context. Commons should not enable classroom stalkers: These images should be deleted and the uploader warned to take his creepiness soemwhere else. Should Julia, Aleksandra, and any of the Weronikas be interested in having their photos in Commons, they are welcome to create their own accounts and upload whatever they feel like, which will be evaluated for its metrits — pretty faces can make great photos, on both sides of the camera.
- File:Weronika Wachowiak.jpg*
- File:Weronika Karbowiak.jpg*
- File:Aleksandra Ziętak.jpg**
- File:Julia Kępska.jpg
-- Tuválkin ✉ 07:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Also, a third image** has a well formed DR already pending. None of these 4 was found online by GoogleImages anywhere except in Commons (so this is not from Facebook or some such). -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, besides of the important issue mentioned by the nominator, all are out of COM:SCOPE, as being personal shots of evidently non-notable person, some of whom might even be minors. Images are not even used as userpageimages. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I’m sure they are all minors, including the intrepid uploader. But we could hardly illustrate an encyclopedia (the strictest scope for Commons) without images of minors. Not to mention how unfair and disenfranchising such limit would feel to said minors. I remember well feeling pretty miserable and royally pissed off at 15 when I learned that I needed to wait 3 years to be allowed in my country’s National Library — I mean, like, w.t.f., right?! -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Turelio, nom . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by Thepalerider2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Lei 3.ogv
- File:Metronomo.jpg
- File:Forças normais e de atrito entre os pneus de uma bicicleta e a estrada..png
- File:Autoestrada.png
- File:Circuito usado para determinar a caraterística de um LED..png
- File:Motor elétrico de corrente contínua..png
- File:Autocarro experimental a hidrogénio da STCP no Porto.png
- File:Alguns Capacitores.png
- File:Discos de volta.png
- File:Maquina de wimhurst.png
- File:Rede cristalina.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Tables uploaded by Thepalerider2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Tables which could be replaced with wiki markup.
- File:Tabela nuclear 2.png
- File:Números atuais relacionados às partículas subatômicas.png
- File:Cálculos dos desdobramentos de Zeeman..png
- File:Cálculos do fator g.png
- File:Tabela 2 JJ.png
- File:Tabela j-j.png
- File:Tabela radiotividade.png
- File:Materiais 2.png
- File:Constantes 1.png
- File:Constantes 2.png
- File:Materiais 1.png
- File:Tabela 2 eletro.png
- File:Tabela força elemotriz.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Deng Senyue Rope.jpg
- File:Deng Senyue Ribbon.jpg
- File:Deng Senyue Circle.jpg
- File:Deng Senyue Podium.jpg
- File:Deng Senyue Ball.jpg
- File:Yundi LI.jpg
- File:LI Yundi in Mariinsky Theatre.jpg
- File:Artem Ovcharenko Nutcracker.jpg
- File:Artem Ovcharenko Paris.jpg
- File:Artem Ovcharenko Beijing.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Place Dalida
[edit]- File:244471342 113be00f3e o.jpg
- File:Place DALIDA - Bute Montmartre (Paris).jpg
- File:Paris 18 - Place Dalida - Dalida.JPG
- File:La place Dalida.JPG
- File:Dalida-Bust-1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FOP in france. No permission from artist fr:Aslan (artiste).--Wdwd (talk) 17:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The first one is DM, the others, unfortunately, are not. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploads of User:Shiva Shukla (shi1997va)
[edit]- File:Shiva Vid Shukla.jpg
- File:Vid Claim.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla.jpg
- File:Shiva shukla.jpg
- File:Vid Shukla.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla & frnds.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla and frnds.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla & Amit Srivastava.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla & Group.jpg
- File:Yo Shiva Shukla.jpg
- File:Videh Shukla.JPG
- File:Shiva shukla Videh.JPG
- File:Shi1997va.JPG
- File:Shiva Shukla ....jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla & Shivam shukla Mint.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla Elegance.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla With His Brothers WP.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla WP.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla In B&W.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla in ceremony.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla in Violet.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla in o.m.p.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla 24034673 m0boWTf 1373550668.jpg
- File:Shiva Shukla With Frnd Group Pic..jpg
All uploads of this user are personal shots of himself, alone or with friends, i.e. non-encyclopedic vanity-photos and thereby clearly out of COM:SCOPE. He might have confused Commons with Facebook. --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
copyvio: http://www.venevision.net/mundo-show/galeria/joselo-una-leyenda-del-humor-venezolano-galeria-de-fotos Laura Fiorucci (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom whym (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio per nom. INeverCry 20:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
copyvio: http://www.lanacion.com.ve/farandula-y-espectaculos/se-fue-joselo/ Laura Fiorucci (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --whym (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
copyvio: http://noticiaaldia.com/2013/01/fallecio-el-humorista-venezolano-joselo/ Laura Fiorucci (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. whym (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Los Mendigos, sketch junto al actor cómico Napoleón Defitt y Manolo Malpica Semillita.jpg
[edit]
copyvio: http://noticiaaldia.com/2013/01/fotos-los-mejores-momentos-de-joselo/joselo-napoleon-deffit-semillita-manolo-malpica/ Laura Fiorucci (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom whym (talk) 11:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Publicity photo previously published by an explicitly copyrighted site under no possibility of reuse, no free license and no acknowledgment of the photographer's rights. Claimed to be made by the uploader; however, no explanation is provided how this claim is consistent with the rights reserved by the same copyrighted site. It seems that the procedure detailed in en:WP:IOWN is to be undertaken; otherwise - delete. Prokurator11 (talk) 18:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I contacted Yesh Atid party, and I told them about the Deletion requests of several pictures of their Knesset members. They assured me that the pictures were uploaded to Commons by them. They sent an OTRS permission to this picture and to the others. see Ticket:2013091010004909 . I added the permossin to the picture. please close the Deletion request. It was lucki that part of the pictures were on my watchlist and I could solve the problem. We need always look for a way to keep the pictures not delete them. Thanks Hanay (talk) 08:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS whym (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Publicity photo previously published by an explicitly copyrighted site under no possibility of reuse, no free license and no acknowledgment of the photographer's rights. Claimed to be made by the uploader; however, no explanation is provided how this claim is consistent with the rights reserved by the same copyrighted site. It seems that the procedure detailed in en:WP:IOWN is to be undertaken; otherwise - delete. Prokurator11 (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
![18:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/07#c-Prokurator11-2013-09-07T18:46:00.000Z-File:ח"כ_יפעת_קריב.jpg){kind=link}
- I contacted Yesh Atid party, and I told them about the Deletion requests of several pictures of their Knesset members. They assured me that the pictures were uploaded to Commons by them. They sent an OTRS permission to this picture and to the others. see Ticket:2013091010004909 . I added the permossin to the picture. please close the Deletion request. It was lucki that part of the pictures were on my watchlist and I could solve the problem. We need always look for a way to keep the pictures not delete them. Thanks Hanay (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS whym (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
![11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/07#c-Whym-2013-09-15T11:12:00.000Z-File:ח"כ_יפעת_קריב.jpg){kind=link}
Publicity photo previously published by an explicitly copyrighted site under no possibility of reuse, no free license and no acknowledgment of the photographer's rights. Claimed to be made by the uploader; however, no explanation is provided how this claim is consistent with the rights reserved by the same copyrighted site. It seems that the procedure detailed in en:WP:IOWN is to be undertaken; otherwise - delete. Prokurator11 (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
![18:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/07#c-Prokurator11-2013-09-07T18:46:00.000Z-File:ח"כ_רינה_פרנקל.jpg){kind=link}
- I contacted Yesh Atid party, and I told them about the Deletion requests of several pictures of their Knesset members. They assured me that the pictures were uploaded to Commons by them. They sent an OTRS permission to this picture and to the others. see Ticket:2013091010004909 . I added the permossin to the picture. please close the Deletion request. It was lucki that part of the pictures were on my watchlist and I could solve the problem. We need always look for a way to keep the pictures not delete them. Thanks Hanay (talk) 08:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS whym (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
![11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/07#c-Whym-2013-09-15T11:12:00.000Z-File:ח"כ_רינה_פרנקל.jpg){kind=link}
Publicity photo previously published by an explicitly copyrighted site under no possibility of reuse, no free license and no acknowledgment of the photographer's rights. Claimed to be made by the uploader; however, no explanation is provided how this claim is consistent with the rights reserved by the same copyrighted site. It seems that the procedure detailed in en:WP:IOWN is to be undertaken; otherwise - delete. Prokurator11 (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete—no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder. —Ynhockey (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- I contacted Yesh Atid party, and I told them about the Deletion requests of several pictures of their Knesset members. They assured me that the pictures were uploaded to Commons by them. They sent an OTRS permission to this picture and to the others. see Ticket:2013091010004909 . I added the permossin to the picture. please close the Deletion request. It was lucki that part of the pictures were on my watchlist and I could solve the problem. We need always look for a way to keep the pictures not delete them. Thanks Hanay (talk) 08:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS whym (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Publicity photo previously published by an explicitly copyrighted site under no possibility of reuse, no free license and no acknowledgment of the photographer's rights. Claimed to be made by the uploader; however, no explanation is provided how this claim is consistent with the rights reserved by the same copyrighted site. It seems that the procedure detailed in en:WP:IOWN is to be undertaken; otherwise - delete. Prokurator11 (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I contacted Yesh Atid party, and I told them about the Deletion requests of several pictures of their Knesset members. They assured me that the pictures were uploaded to Commons by them. They sent an OTRS permission to this picture and to the others. see Ticket:2013091010004909 . I added the permossin to the picture. please close the Deletion request. It was lucki that part of the pictures were on my watchlist and I could solve the problem. We need always look for a way to keep the pictures not delete them. Thanks Hanay (talk) 08:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS whym (talk) 11:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Publicity photo previously published by an explicitly copyrighted site under no possibility of reuse, no free license and no acknowledgment of the photographer's rights. Claimed to be made by the uploader; however, no explanation is provided how this claim is consistent with the rights reserved by the same copyrighted site. It seems that the procedure detailed in en:WP:IOWN is to be undertaken; otherwise - delete. Prokurator11 (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I contacted Yesh Atid party, and I told them about the Deletion requests of several pictures of their Knesset members. They assured me that the pictures were uploaded to Commons by them. They sent an OTRS permission to this picture and to the others. see Ticket:2013091010004909 . I added the permossin to the picture. please close the Deletion request. It was lucki that part of the pictures were on my watchlist and I could solve the problem. We need always look for a way to keep the pictures not delete them. Thanks Hanay (talk) 08:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS whym (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Private image, no educational value, stretched image, unused, no description Torsch (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Moot. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Sbaglio di licenza Sreejith K (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Private image, no educational value, unused, no description Torsch (talk) 06:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Moot. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Private image, no educational value, unused, no description Torsch (talk) 06:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Moot. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I believe this violates Commons:Image_casebook#Board_games and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 21:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
{{Delete |reason=与[1]中的图片拍摄角度、曝光等几乎完全相同，疑为侵权。 |subpage=File:Coat of arms of Zhongtaizhongrenquanguiguo.jpg |day=24 |month=August |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyuwj (talk • contribs) 2013-08-24T16:27:23 (UTC)
Deleted: It is likely to be copyright violation whym (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
unused, superseded by File:Norwegian-road-sign-306.0.svg Ricordisamoa 16:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete: unused and unneeded. Alkari (?), 7 September 2013, 21:56 UTC
- Delete Per nom, per Alkari. --Cekli829 (talk) 11:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per consensus. whym (talk) 12:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Propaganda (Quelle?). 87.123.80.47 17:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
There are more two-national flags here. This one is nicer. Hosmich (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see either as a reason for deletion. Keep Fry1989 eh? 04:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fry1989. No valid reason for deletion provided. whym (talk) 06:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Duplicat error Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted and converted to redirect. whym (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Aimé Venel (born in 1950) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 82.124.60.9 13:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
![13:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/07#c-82.124.60.9-2013-09-07T13:05:00.000Z-File:Aimé_Venel_peignant_le_triptyque_"Pour_le_chant_des_oiseaux".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
![09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/09/07#c-Fastily-2013-09-22T09:31:00.000Z-File:Aimé_Venel_peignant_le_triptyque_"Pour_le_chant_des_oiseaux".jpg){kind=link}
Work under copyright / travail protégé par le droit d'auteur Trizek from FR 13:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded it twice with the WLM-Uploader Mr.Nutt (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Same picture used in here in 2009. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Is a part of Val Colla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschubby (talk • contribs) 2013-08-10T05:09:55 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Is a part of Val Colla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschubby (talk • contribs) 2013-08-10T05:07:00 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Is a part of Val Colla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschubby (talk • contribs) 2013-08-10T05:10:36 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Wrong license. This photgraph of a WW1 German artillery piece was surely not first published in the US. Copyright violation 178.7.239.221 12:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: this picture was taken by Kathleen Abercrombie Thomsep (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
tabla grafica sin referencias , ya existe una tabla etnografica con referencias para el ecuador — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kodosbs (talk • contribs) 2013-09-04T17:54:10 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
There's nothing written from Public Domain for the images. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
No eviden for PDold provided 178.7.239.221 13:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Restored: Public domain photo.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license. This photgraph of a WW1 platoon was surely not first published in the US. No so called "US work". Copyright violation 178.7.239.221 12:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://worldtop7.com/us/ Jujutacular (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Australian rules football jumpers (Batch 1)
[edit]Given the very low threshold of originality in Australia these are just copies of team jumper design, and can only be used with non-free rationales (the same as a non-free logo) ans should be moved back to local projects which allow fair use
- File:Adfajumper.png
- File:Baroogajumper.png
- File:Barwonheadsjumper.png
- File:Beaconjumper.png
- File:Bencubbinjumper.png
- File:Bermaguijumper.png
- File:Beulahjumper.png
- File:Blacktown Magic Jumper.png
- File:Blightyjumper.png
- File:Bluewhitebulldogs.png
- File:Bmjumper.png
- File:Bmwjumper.png
- File:Bonbeachjumper.png
- File:Bonniedoonjumper.png
- File:Boroniajumper.png
- File:Bppanthers.png
- File:Brigadesjumper.png
- File:BurleighBombersJumper.jpg
- File:Burracoppinjumper.png
- File:Bushpigs.jpg
- File:Bxbombers-kit.jpg
- File:Carisbrookjumper.png
- File:Carlton Blues Jumper.svg
- File:Carlton-Clash-2013.gif
- File:Casinolions.png
- File:Cedunajumper.png
- File:Centralwhyalla.png
- File:Centralyorkejumper.png
- File:Cervantesjumper.png
- File:Classic Port Adelaide Power Jumper.svg
- File:Cohunakangasjumper.png
- File:Corriginjumper.png
- File:Cougarsjumper.png
- File:Cpljumper.png
- File:CraigieburnFC.png
- File:Culcairnjumper.png
- File:Dandenongjumper.png
- File:Darleyjumper.png
- File:Denningtonjumper.png
- File:Donaldjumper.png
- File:Dromana Jumper.jpg
- File:Dubbojumper.png
- File:Eaglesjumper.png
- File:EastKeilorFC.jpeg
- File:Eastpointjumper.png
- File:Ebjumper.png
- File:Edenhopeapsleyjumper.jpeg
- File:Erjumper.png
- File:Federalsjumper.png
- File:FrankstonYCWFC.JPG
- File:Fremantle Dockers Jumper.svg
- File:Geelongamateurs.png
- File:Geelongwestjumper.png
- File:Gembrookcockatoojumper.png
- File:Gibsonjumper.png
- File:Gold Coast FC.jpg
- File:Gold Coast Suns Guernsey.png
- File:Gold Coast Suns Guernsey1.png
- File:Greencatsjumper.png
- File:Greengoldroos.png
- File:Greengoldroosjumper.png
- File:Gungahlinjumper.png
- File:Gwhawksjumper.png
- File:Harcourtjumper.png
- File:Hastings Jumper.jpg
- File:Heathmontjumper.png
- File:Hopetounjumper.png
- File:Imperialjumper.png
- File:Inglewoodjumper.png
- File:Irymplejumper.png
- File:Jerilderiejumper.png
- File:Kangarooflatjumper.png
- File:Karingal Jumper.jpg
- File:Katandrajumper.png
- File:Katsjumper.png
- File:Kdcougarsjumper.png
- File:Kerangjumper.png
- File:Kiamajumper.png
- File:Klujumper.png
- File:Koordajumper.png
LGA talkedits 08:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Delete all, but can they be moved to ENWP where they can be hosted under fair use first? Liamdavies (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure a on-mass move is possible, some can be hosted on enwp as free images on the bases they are {{Template:PD-ineligible-USonly}}, others will be suitable as fair use, others will fail the WP:NFC#UUI. LGA talkedits 08:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Australian rules football jumpers (Batch #2)
[edit]as per batch 1 : Given the very low threshold of originality in Australia these are just copies of team jumper design, and can only be used with non-free rationales (the same as a non-free logo) and should be moved back to local projects which allow fair use.
- File:1874.svg
- File:Adelaide Crows Jumper.svg
- File:Alternatemagpies.png
- File:Avocajumper.png
- File:Bacchusmarshjumper.png
- File:Balwynjumper.png
- File:Barellanjumper.png
- File:Bathurstjumper.png
- File:Bellparkjumper.png
- File:BenambraJumper.png
- File:Bigvjumper.png
- File:Blackredyokejumper.png
- File:Blackwhitegoldjumper.png
- File:Blueroos.png
- File:Borderdistrictsjumper.png
- File:Bridgenorthjumper.png
- File:Bridgewaterjumper.png
- File:Broadbeach Cats jumper.jpg
- File:Bulnbulnjumper.png
- File:Campbellscreekjumper.png
- File:Canterburycobrasjumper.png
- File:Cardiffjumper.png
- File:CentralAugusta.PNG
- File:Chirnsideparkjumper.png
- File:Churchill jumper.jpeg
- File:Coburg FC.jpg
- File:Collingwood Magpies Jumper.svg
- File:Coolamonjumper.png
- File:Coralynnjumper.png
- File:Deakinunijumper.png
- File:Deniliquinjumper.png
- File:Donvalejumper.png
- File:Dvmpnfl.PNG
- File:EssDouttaStars.jpg
- File:Essendon Bombers Jumper.svg
- File:Footscray bombrars.png
- File:Footy Kit Template.png
- File:Foresthilljumper.png
- File:Fremantle bombrars.png
- File:Fremantle Dockers Jumper-2011.svg
- File:Geelong Cats Jumper.svg
- File:Glenthompsondunkeldjumper.png
- File:Goldensquarejumper.png
- File:Goorambatjumper.png
- File:GreevaleFC.jpg
- File:Hawthorn Hawks Jumper.svg
- File:Hillendjumper.png
- File:Hpmpnfl.PNG
- File:Hydenjumper.png
- File:Ironbank jumper.png
- File:Jackos Jumper rear.JPG
- File:Jackos Jumper.JPG
- File:Kalanniejumper.png
- File:Katanningjumper.png
- File:Kinglakejumper.png
- File:Knoxjumper.png
- File:Kulinkondininjumper.png
- File:Lakesentrancejumper.png
- File:LakeTyersJumper.png
- File:Lakewendoureejumper.png
- File:Lalbertjumper.png
- File:Lancelinjumper.png
- File:Langy FC.jpg
- File:Lfcjumper.png
- File:Lockhartjumper.png
- File:Longwoodjumper.png
- File:Lornejumper.png
- File:Lyndalejumper.png
- File:Macquarie University Jumper.png
- File:Maldonjumper.png
- File:Malleeparkjumper.png
- File:Manly WarringahJumper.svg.png
- File:Maribyrnong park.jpg
- File:Marongjumper.png
- File:Marooneaglesjumper.png
- File:Maryboroughmagpies.png
- File:Maryvalejumper.png
- File:Mayne Tigers Jumper.svg.png
- File:Mclarenjumper.png
- File:Melbourne Demons Jumper.svg
- File:Meltonjumper.png
- File:Minyipmurtoajumper.png
- File:Modewarrejumper.png
- File:Moorebank Sports Magpies Jumper.png
- File:Mooroolbarkjumper.png
- File:Mountcompassjumper.png
- File:Mountevelynjumper.png
- File:Moyhujumper.png
- File:Mtwaverleyjumper.png
- File:Mudgeejumper.png
- File:Mukinbudinjumper.png
- File:Mulgravejumper.png
- File:Mundullajumper.png
- File:Murrabitjumper.png
- File:Murrumbidgeejumper.png
- File:Mypongajumper.png
- File:Narembeenjumper.png
- File:Narnargoonjumper.png
- File:Naroomajumper.png
- File:Nathaliajumper.png
- File:Natimukjumper.png
- File:Navarrejumper.png
- File:Nelsonbayjumper.png
- File:Newbridgejumper.png
- File:Newcombpowerjumper.png
- File:Newnunawadingjumper.png
- File:Newtowncondingupjumper.png
- File:Nhilljumper.png
- File:Nobleparkjumper.png
- File:Nomadsjumper.png
- File:North Melbourne Kangaroos Jumper.svg
- File:Northamptonjumper.png
- File:Northcote Park Cougars.JPG
- File:Northern Territory Jumper.PNG
- File:Northerndistrictsjumper.png
- File:NorthernSaintsFC.jpg
- File:Northgambierjumper.png
- File:Nukarnijumper.png
- File:Nullawiljumper.png
- File:Numurkahjumper.png
- File:Nungarinjumper.png
- File:Oakleighdistrictsjumper.png
- File:Oceangrovejumper.png
- File:OHA Jumper.jpg
- File:Old footscray jumper.png
- File:Old freo away.png
- File:Old wce jumper.png
- File:Oldcollegiansjumper.png
- File:Olympicdamjumper.png
- File:OmeoBenambraJumper.png
- File:OmeoJumper.png
- File:Osrjumper.png
- File:Ottawa Swans Jumper 2008.svg
- File:Pambulajumper.png
- File:Parkorchardsjumper.png
- File:Penolajumper.png
- File:Penshurstjumper.png
- File:Picolaunitedjumper.png
- File:PinesFC.JPG
- File:Port Adelaide Power Jumper.svg
- File:Port.PNG
- File:Portfairyjumper.png
- File:Portsjumper.png
- File:Pumasjumper.png
- File:Quairadingjumper.png
- File:Queenscliffjumper.png
- File:Raidersjumper.png
- File:Railwaysjumper.png
- File:Ramcojumper.png
- File:Randjumper.png
- File:Redanjumper.png
- File:Redblacksash.png
- File:Redjumper.png
- File:Redroos.png
- File:Redwhitebarsjumper.png
- File:Redwhitejumper.png
- File:Renniejumper.png
- File:Reverselionsjumper.png
- File:Richmond Tigers Jumper.svg
- File:Robinvalejumper.png
- File:Roosalternate.png
- File:Rosedale FC.jpeg
- File:Rudalljumper.png
- File:Rumbalarajumper.png
- File:Rupanyupjumper.png
- File:Saints AFC Jumper.png
- File:Sandhurstjumper.png
- File:Silvanjumper.png
- File:Singletonjumper.png
- File:Skyejumper.png
- File:Solo.PNG
- File:SouthAugusta.PNG
- File:Southbarwonjumper.png
- File:Southbelgravejumper.png
- File:Southbendigojumper.png
- File:Southern Power Jumper.jpg
- File:Southlincolnjumper.png
- File:Springvaledistrictsjumper.png
- File:St Kilda Saints Jumper.svg
- File:Stalbansjumper.png
- File:Stanhopejumper.png
- File:Stawelljumper.png
- File:Stjoeysjumper.png
- File:Stmarysjumper.png
- File:Stratford FC.jpeg
- File:Swanhilljumper.png
- File:Swanpooljumper.png
- File:SwanReachJumper.png
- File:Sydney Swans Jumper.svg
- File:Talbotjumper.png
- File:Tallangattajumper.png
- File:Tasmanjumper.png
- File:Tdmpnfl.PNG
- File:Thebasinjumper.png
- File:Thorpdalejumper.png
- File:Tongalajumper.png
LGA talkedits 10:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Move to enwp please. And next time, how about letting us know what is going on. One short note to the obviously most relevant project should be mandatory before you burn the house down. [2]. The-Pope (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
as per batches 1 & 2 : Given the very low threshold of originality in Australia these are just copies of team jumper design, and can only be used with non-free rationales (the same as a non-free logo) and should be moved back to local projects which allow fair use. As for use on enwp, some can be hosted as free images on the bases they are {{PD-ineligible-USonly|Australia}}, others will be suitable as fair use, others will fail the WP:NFC#UUI.
- File:Adelaide bombrars.png
- File:Carlton bombrars.png
- File:Collingwood bombrars.png
- File:EssBombersjumper.png
- File:Freo Away.jpg
- File:Geelong bombrars.png
- File:Gold coast bombrars.png
- File:Gws giants bombrars.png
- File:Hawthorn bombrars.png
- File:Melbourne bombrars.png
- File:North melbourne bombrars.png
- File:PAFC 2013 Home and Away.png
- File:Richmond bombrars.png
- File:St kilda bombrars.png
- File:Sydney bombrars.png
- File:Torrensvalley.png
- File:Tumbybayjumper.png
- File:Tungamahjumper.png
- File:Tweed coast.jpg
- File:Twobluesash.png
- File:Tyabb Jumper.jpg
- File:Udfc.png
- File:Unibulldogs.png
- File:UNSWEasternSuburbsJumper.jpg
- File:Vermontjumper.png
- File:Violettownjumper.png
- File:Waginjumper.png
- File:Wallawallajumper.png
- File:Wantirnasouthjumper.png
- File:Waragulindustrialsjumper.png
- File:Warburtonjumper.png
- File:Warnersbayjumper.png
- File:Warragul Football Club Jumper.jpg
- File:Warrnambooljumper.png
- File:Waverleybluesjumper.png
- File:Wentworthjumper.png
- File:West coast bombrars.png
- File:WestAugusta.PNG
- File:Whitehillsjumper.png
- File:Whitehorsepioneersjumper.png
- File:Whiteredyoke.png
- File:Whoroulyjumper.png
- File:Wilston Grange Jumper.jpg
- File:Wodenjumper.png
- File:Wodongajumper.png
- File:Yarraglenjumper.png
- File:Yorkjumper.png
LGA talkedits 21:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- keep all and undelete all of the above unless you can prove that each and every license individually is invalid, and then move those images individually to en WP with non free logo licenses. Your assumption of low threshold of originality assumes that the designs that images are based on are not public domain (some of these simple designs have been in use from the late 1890s). That assumption of low threshold of originality uses a legal decision regarding an extremely high profile and culturally significant flag as a precedent for clothing designs, which to me is quite strange and a big leap. Bulk deletions like this show no evidence of the nominator doing any form of BEFORE checks and are destructive to the project, for no real benefit. Has any copyright holder ever submitted a claim of infringement? You are all jumping at shadows. Thank you for at least letting us know this time. The-Pope (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Have a read of Precautionary principle it covers your arguments, these Jumpers are based on the designs by the clubs in question and are therefore are derivative works of them and in common with other Common law countries, Australia has a very low threshold of originality so they are copyrighted in Australia and can't be hosted on commons. As has been explained before a on mass transfer is not possible as some images, such as File:St kilda bombrars.png will be {{PD-ineligible-USonly|Australia}} on enwp, others such as File:West coast bombrars.png could be added to enwp as fair use with a FUR for each page they are used on and removed from non-article pages. However others such as File:Warnersbayjumper.png would probably not meet the fair use in tables rules. LGA talkedits 01:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- I should also draw your attention back to this edit of yours when you said about a similar jumper that it is a "copy of their jumper design, and should be restricted in it's use (non-free rationales etc), licenced as a non-free logo, not public domain and moved back to en.". LGA talkedits 02:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- All I'm asking is for **you**, the nominator, to be specific and selective and appropriate. Do not use a nuclear bomb to clear the decks when selective trimming and moving would do the required job. Ask for help, we'll write the FURs. Act like this and we get annoyed. If you came to WP:AFL and said - "Guys, we have a problem, 80 jumpers with complicated logos, monograms or other recent specific designs can't be released under a free licence and can't be hosted on commons, if we move them, will you write FURs in the next few days/weeks" we would have helped out. Ever think of doing that? Working collaboratively? Ever think of maintaining the information to the world? We are writing this encyclopedia for the readers, not whatever your motives are. From your "Precautionary principle" I would argue that for many of these designs there is no significant doubt over their licencing. The-Pope (talk) 07:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Given the court case relating to the Aboriginal flag shows just how low the threshold of originality is for copyright protection in Australia there is little or no doubt that all of these are protected by copyright in Australia and that copyright vests with the team and not as claimed the uploader. If you want them transfered so bad, you do it. LGA talkedits 09:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thankfully, I am not a lawyer, but my reading of that ruling is that it makes no decision whatsoever about any threshold of originality, it is solely about who created it and when. Has any real world use of this apparent low threshold of originality ever been used in Australia to claim copyright on simple graphics for items less significant than a hugely important flag that is specified in an act of parliament? As for me doing the moves, I can't transfer any of the ones you've already deleted, can I? Is it allowed to move files during a deletion discussion? Can non admins move files at all? The-Pope (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- It does, look at "The court orders that" section, part 1 b says that the work is copyright, if the work was below any threshold of originality the court would not have made that order. As for moving files, all you need to do is download them and the re-upload them to enwp, I am not aware of a tool that will do a commons to enwp copy. As for the ones already deleted an admin has already made a recommendation to you. LGA talkedits 20:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you made that assertion in an article I'd delete it for synthesis. Simple design A is copyright does not mean that all simple designs are copyright. Precedents aren't made as simply as that. Searching for examples of the flag being used add a precedent come up blank. Most threshold of originality cases seem to revolve around databases etc, not art. So, I ask again. Can you provide any evidence of simple designs other that a hugely significant flag being deemed copyrightable due to Australia's apparently low threshold of originally.The-Pope (talk) 09:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- It does, look at "The court orders that" section, part 1 b says that the work is copyright, if the work was below any threshold of originality the court would not have made that order. As for moving files, all you need to do is download them and the re-upload them to enwp, I am not aware of a tool that will do a commons to enwp copy. As for the ones already deleted an admin has already made a recommendation to you. LGA talkedits 20:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thankfully, I am not a lawyer, but my reading of that ruling is that it makes no decision whatsoever about any threshold of originality, it is solely about who created it and when. Has any real world use of this apparent low threshold of originality ever been used in Australia to claim copyright on simple graphics for items less significant than a hugely important flag that is specified in an act of parliament? As for me doing the moves, I can't transfer any of the ones you've already deleted, can I? Is it allowed to move files during a deletion discussion? Can non admins move files at all? The-Pope (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Given the court case relating to the Aboriginal flag shows just how low the threshold of originality is for copyright protection in Australia there is little or no doubt that all of these are protected by copyright in Australia and that copyright vests with the team and not as claimed the uploader. If you want them transfered so bad, you do it. LGA talkedits 09:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- All I'm asking is for **you**, the nominator, to be specific and selective and appropriate. Do not use a nuclear bomb to clear the decks when selective trimming and moving would do the required job. Ask for help, we'll write the FURs. Act like this and we get annoyed. If you came to WP:AFL and said - "Guys, we have a problem, 80 jumpers with complicated logos, monograms or other recent specific designs can't be released under a free licence and can't be hosted on commons, if we move them, will you write FURs in the next few days/weeks" we would have helped out. Ever think of doing that? Working collaboratively? Ever think of maintaining the information to the world? We are writing this encyclopedia for the readers, not whatever your motives are. From your "Precautionary principle" I would argue that for many of these designs there is no significant doubt over their licencing. The-Pope (talk) 07:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Same as before. These are not ok for Commons -FASTILY 06:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
as per batches 1, 2 and 3 : Given the very low threshold of originality in Australia these are just copies of team jumper design, and can only be used with non-free rationales (the same as a non-free logo) and should be moved back to local projects which allow fair use. As for use on enwp, some can be hosted as free images on the bases they are {{PD-ineligible-USonly|Australia}}, others will be suitable as fair use, others will fail the WP:NFC#UUI.
- File:Bendigo Fc Jumper 2012.JPG
- File:Bendigo Gold FC Guernsey 2.JPG
- File:Bendigo Gold FC Guernsey.JPG
- File:Bundoora Bulls Logo.png
- File:Diamond-Creek-Jumper.png
- File:Eltham-Panthers-Jumper.png
- File:Epping-Blues-Jumper.png
- File:Fitzroy-Stars-Jumper.png
- File:Gorodon Eagles Jumper.jpg
- File:Greensborough-Boro-Jumper.png
- File:Heidelberg-Tigers-Jumper.png
- File:Heidelberg-West-Hawks-Jumper.png
- File:Hurstbridge-Bridges-Jumper.png
- File:Karoonda Jumper.png
- File:Lalor-Bloods-Jumper.png
- File:Lower-Plenty-Bears-Jumper.png
- File:Macleod-Kangaroos-Jumper.png
- File:Melbourne Tigers Uniform 2011.JPG
- File:Mernda-Demons-Jumper.png
- File:Montmorency-Magpies-Jumper.png
- File:North-Heidelberg-Bulldogs-Jumper.png
- File:Northcote-Park-Cougars-Jumper.png
- File:Northern Blues Guernnsey.jpg
- File:Northern-territory-jumper.jpg
- File:Northern-territory-old-state-jumper.jpg
- File:Nsw-act-jumper.jpg
- File:Nsw-state-jumper.jpg
- File:Panton-Hill-Redbacks-Jumper.png
- File:Parkside-Devils-Jumper.png
- File:Queensland-2014-jumper.jpg
- File:Queensland-state-1950s-jumper.jpg
- File:Queensland-state-1970s-80s-jumper.jpg
- File:Queensland-state-1990s-2000s-jumper.jpg
- File:Reservoir-Mustangs-Jumper.png
- File:South-australia-jumper.jpg
- File:South-Morang-Lions-Jumper.png
- File:St.Marys-Burra-Jumper.png
- File:Tasmania-jumper.jpg
- File:Thomastown-Bears-Jumper.png
- File:Vic-country-jumper.jpg
- File:Vic-metro-jumper.jpg
- File:Victoria-jumper.jpg
- File:Watsonia-Saints-Jumper.png
- File:West-Preston-Lakeside-Heritage-Jumper.png
- File:West-Preston-Lakeside-Jumper.png
- File:Western-australia-jumper.jpg
- File:Whittlesea-Eagles-Jumper.png
- File:Williamstown Fc Clash.JPG
LGA talkedits 00:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 11:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
poor quality, superseded by File:Flag of Raetia.svg Ricordisamoa 16:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested deletion request of a superseded image. whym (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
unused, superseded by File:Flag of Raetia.svg Ricordisamoa 16:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested deletion request of a superseded image. whym (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
SVG was also uploaded today, we only need the superior format. Fry1989 eh? 00:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's hardly a reason to delete this. This is the original version and it is better to keep for future reference in case the SVG is incorrectly rendered. Besides, I haven't read anything about it not being allowed and the SVG is just a derivative and someone else's work. --User 50 (talk) 06:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's a perfectly good reason. When we have an SVG image and a PNG is uploaded later, it's almost always deleted. In this case while the PNG was uploaded first, it was only a matter of hours. We have a good SVG, we don't need a scaled down dupe. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It was transferred from Wikipedia and was there for a long time... I'm just saying that the government's official rendering should be kept because it is the original one, the one that was used as a reference to make the SVG. You don't just make a copy and delete the original. Also, if you search you will find many files here where the original PNG version is kept. --User 50 (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- And you will find just as many, if not more, where the PNG was deleted. Fry1989 eh? 03:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- So I suppose everything in Category:Vector version available should be deleted? I suppose Commons talk:Superseded images policy is irrelevant? What makes this copy superior and what is the rationale in deleting a file because an SVG version is available?
- And you will find just as many, if not more, where the PNG was deleted. Fry1989 eh? 03:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It was transferred from Wikipedia and was there for a long time... I'm just saying that the government's official rendering should be kept because it is the original one, the one that was used as a reference to make the SVG. You don't just make a copy and delete the original. Also, if you search you will find many files here where the original PNG version is kept. --User 50 (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's a perfectly good reason. When we have an SVG image and a PNG is uploaded later, it's almost always deleted. In this case while the PNG was uploaded first, it was only a matter of hours. We have a good SVG, we don't need a scaled down dupe. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's hardly a reason to delete this. This is the original version and it is better to keep for future reference in case the SVG is incorrectly rendered. Besides, I haven't read anything about it not being allowed and the SVG is just a derivative and someone else's work. --User 50 (talk) 06:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I like this: "... however, there is no valid rationale for deleting one file, merely because another, simillar but non-identical file [superceded] exists, & is considered by some users to be superior in some ways and/or for some uses.
a "superceded" (non-identical) file should only be deleted when there are other, valid rationale(s) for the deletion." --User 50 (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's not what I said at all and you know it. If an SVG exists and a duplicate in a inferior format is uploaded at a later date, it's almost always deleted. This file and it's SVG superior are only separated by about 10 minutes. There's no reason to keep it when we have the SVG as well. If you can't argue based on that and have to twist things, you have no argument at all. Fry1989 eh? 04:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It was on wikipedia for far longer (2011 I believe)... The SVG is only a few weeks old, I just moved both recently to commons. There is also no reason to delete it. A repository of images can't have the original file and its SVG derivative? O.o Where is the harm in that? What other reasons are there to delete this other than "an SVG version exists"? --User 50 (talk) 04:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't care where it was! I'm talking about Commons and Commons alone. Fry1989 eh? 04:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Just tell me if a supposedly superior alternative format warrants deletion of another format with the argument of "we only need the superior format". If I uploaded a picture and a touched up one. Should the original be automatically deleted? and another thing I wasn't aware that two formats cannot co-exist here, just as any unused images should be deleted because a superior picture exists and "we only need the superior picture" --User 50 (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Again, if you can not argue against my nomination without twisting things around from their original context, you have no argument at all. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I still don't get what I'm "twisting", you stated "SVG was also uploaded today, we only need the superior format." That is not a rationale for deleting. Nowhere have I have read that this isn't allowed. You still haven't answered my question on what other reasons warrants its deletion and you accuse me of having no arguments. All I'm saying is that the fact there is an SVG DOES NOT mean the original file that was uploaded should be deleted because "we only need the superior format" which is completely debatable. An alternative file (SVG, few weeks old) and its original file (PNG, years old) can co-exist thats why those "Vector version available" templates exist where the original file and its history can be preserved. Again, I leave this with my "no arguments" --User 50 (talk) 02:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Again, if you can not argue against my nomination without twisting things around from their original context, you have no argument at all. Fry1989 eh? 17:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Just tell me if a supposedly superior alternative format warrants deletion of another format with the argument of "we only need the superior format". If I uploaded a picture and a touched up one. Should the original be automatically deleted? and another thing I wasn't aware that two formats cannot co-exist here, just as any unused images should be deleted because a superior picture exists and "we only need the superior picture" --User 50 (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't care where it was! I'm talking about Commons and Commons alone. Fry1989 eh? 04:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It was on wikipedia for far longer (2011 I believe)... The SVG is only a few weeks old, I just moved both recently to commons. There is also no reason to delete it. A repository of images can't have the original file and its SVG derivative? O.o Where is the harm in that? What other reasons are there to delete this other than "an SVG version exists"? --User 50 (talk) 04:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- If I've told you once, I've told you a hundred times, it is a perfectly valid reason for deletion and is used all the time. Fry1989 eh? 04:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
It makes nonsense to create more categories. (churches) (ensembles), because you find enough categories for churches or markets. Sreejith K (talk) 03:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marcus Cyron as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Original source unknown, Photographer unknown - how we should know, that the Photographer has died 1942 or earlier?
Changed by me to DR, per the uploader's talkpage comment: "I do not know exact date. But the photo is older than 1986 which is the date of being public domain in Egypt.". Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've changed the PD-old template to {{PD-Egypt}}, which might be more appropriate, but still needs verification. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- How to verify the photo?--Ashashyou (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY 07:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
No evidence provided that the copyrights have expired. The author is not stated 178.7.239.221 12:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Kann meinetwegen gelöscht werden, brauche es doch nicht, wurde aber angeblich schon 1918 veröffentlicht, siehe Beschreibung. Fotograf Herman Rex. gest. 1938. / Can be deleted, I don´t need it anymore. But: Published 1918, see description. Foto by Hermann Rex, died 1938 in Munich. --Superikonoskop (talk) 12:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept for now, tagged nsd -FASTILY 07:02, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 13:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- This photo has been made by me. You can see here where I first uploaded it. Hence, there is no violation in place. --Robokow (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: ok i guess FASTILY 07:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
poor quality, superseded by File:Flag of Raetia.svg Ricordisamoa 16:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
no longer needed 87.123.89.3 19:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)87.123.89.3 19:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep potentially useful, deletion argument not persuasive--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion Morning ☼ (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Propaganda (Wo ist die Quelle?). 87.123.80.47 20:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: not a valid reason; no source is needed as long as it is an original work of the uploader. --whym (talk) 09:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
This file has lack of encyclopedic value, it is a copy of 
Saudi Arabia flag (excluding sword), also it is not verifiable and a source is just a person. g. balaxaZe★ 12:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence this logo would be free. Eleassar (t/p) 13:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep PD-CroatiaGov applies. Fry1989 eh? 20:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think this logo has been "disclosed for the purpose of officially informing the public." Inform about what? --Eleassar (t/p) 08:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is the same license used for other national symbols of Croatia, this is no different. Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is not a national symbol. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. It is a symbol of the national parliament and therefore a symbol of the country. Are you going to try and argue that File:Deutscher Bundestag logo.svg is not a national symbol of Germany? Fry1989 eh? 20:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps I should: "This file depicts the coat of arms of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (corporation governed by public law). According to § 5 Abs. 1 of the German Copyright law, official works like coats of arms are in the public domain." - the depicted work is a logo, not a coat of arms. Nevertheless, we're discussing another image in this DR. This image is not listed as a national symbol at [3] or [4], and it has not been disclosed for the purpose of officially informing the public. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- The point is not the differences in the license, but rather the symbol itself. It represents the Government of Croatia and for that reason it is a national symbol. You also don't have any clue whether or not it's even used on documents released by the Sabor for the public, in which case it would be included as PD. I can promise you that as a logo of the parliament itself, it most likely has been. You have no understanding at all. Fry1989 eh? 17:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- You have no reliable evidence (sources) for your claims: 1) that it is a national symbol; 2) that it has been included in official documents; and most important, required by law for a work to be considered public domain: 3) that it has been disclosed for the purpose of officially informing the public. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Actually I do by the simple fact it is the symbol of the national parliament and therefore the national government. You interpret licensing as extremely literal and that is your faultpoint. The license also states "(2) news of the day and other news, having the character of mere items of press information", which means it does not have to be explicitly disclosed by the Government, but simply the press may make mention of it. There is zero reason to assume as a high profile work the Croation Government this is not PD like the coat of arms. Fry1989 eh? 20:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Per the Constitution of Croatia, the official language of Croatia is Croatian. How can then a logo with English words be an official work in the legal sense, or even a national symbol? This would be unconstitutional. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- You have to be joking. That's seriously your argument? That the parliament using a logo with another language on it besides Croatian makes it unconstitutional and somehow therefore it can not be an official work or PD as a national symbol??? Talk about grasping at straws. Fry1989 eh? 01:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, this one seems to be incorrect, as there is another symbol with English text cited as official at [5]. However, I still think there is significant doubt that the logo classifies as an official work and an official symbol of Croatia, because:
- it has not been "disclosed for the purpose of officially informing the public"
- it has not been listed among the national symbols of Croatia anywhere
- official works are usually considered those that are passed through an official procedure and/or published in an official journal (Narodne novine), which is not the case with this logo.
- It is also not a "news item" as you have claimed. If you still believe that it is a national symbol and meets the criteria for official works defined by the act, please provide a source that explicitly states this. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- I haven't claimed anything! All I've said is that this is clearly a national symbol and therefore if it was used in any national context such as official releases, including news stories, it's PD by the law. Then you tried to pull some stupid contrived idea that because it has English on it and Croatian is the official language, it is somehow "unconstitutional" which is laughable. You retracted your DR, you have nothing that would cause this to be deleted other than your own self-doubt which is based on highly questionable reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, in which official releases was it used? --Eleassar (t/p) 20:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to show any, you're again taking this so literal when it isn't. The way the license is written means that any release from the Croatian Government which includes this logo, whether it was for public information, for the news, or for whatever else, would make it PD. It's nearly 0% chance that it never has, which means this is PD. You don't have a leg to stand on. Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Well, you do have to show at least one, as the burden of proof is on the uploader, and your statements alone do not constitute any evidence. Not to say that except for those works that have been published through an official procedure, it remains unknown what constitutes an official work in Croatia. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think this logo has been "disclosed for the purpose of officially informing the public." Inform about what? --Eleassar (t/p) 08:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep PD-CroatiaGov. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 01:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: well, er, no clear consensus to delete and/or any clear assertions that this is non-free. Might be worth mentioning at COM:VPC FASTILY 07:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Derivative works of cups and medals.
- File:Supercopa de España 2012.jpg
- File:Trofeo del Campeonato de Europa Sub-19 de la UEFA.jpg
- File:Copa de Europa original en propiedad del Real Madrid.jpg
- File:Copa Intercontinental 2002.jpg
- File:Liga 2011-12.JPG
- File:Triplete de España.JPG
- File:UEFA Euro 2012 trophy.jpg
- File:Copa del Rey 2011.JPG
- File:Medalla de oro Barcelona 1992 Fútbol.jpg
- File:Copa del Rey atropellada.jpg
- File:Copa Mundial de la FIFA ganada por España.jpg
- File:MejorClubdelSigloXX.JPG
- File:Liga ACB.JPG
- File:Madrid 13fgfg.JPG
- File:Madrid 28.JPG
- File:Madrid 2678.JPG
- File:Madrid 322.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Es evidente que la propiedad intelectual conlleva interpretación[6], lo museos crean debate[7] y controversia[8]. La modificación de la ley de propiedad intelectual[9] sólo nombra a los museos en el artículo 37:Los titulares de los derechos de autor no podrán oponerse a las reproducciones de las obras, cuando aquéllas se realicen sin finalidad lucrativa por los museos, bibliotecas, fonotecas, filmotecas, hemerotecas o archivos de titularidad pública o integradas en instituciones de carácter cultural o científico y la reproducción se realice exclusivamente para fines de investigación o conservación. Por lo tanto, según esta ley, los titulares intelectuales de los trofeos no pueden negarse a que hayan reproducciones en un espacio cultural como es commons. --88.6.16.94 18:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- But Commons requires a licence which permits anyone to use a photo for any purpose. The above text about museums is way too restrictive. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative works of cups and medals. PierreSelim (talk) 06:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
It is not clear where these was taken however FOP in Spain requires the works to be "permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares" it looks like this is inside in a museum so fails FOP requirements.
- File:Copa de Europa original.jpg
- File:Eurocopa 1964.jpg
- File:Liga 2007-08.JPG
- File:Supercopa 2008.JPG
- File:Supercopa 2012.jpg
- File:Copa del Rey atropellada.jpg
- File:Liga 2011-12.JPG
- File:Copa 2010-11.JPG
- File:Eurocopa 2012.jpg
LGA talkedits 01:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment About File:Copa del Rey atropellada.jpg, little of the original design remains cause the cup is destroyed. I would Keep that one and Delete the rest. Lobo (howl?) 11:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I did think longer about that one but more on the lines of COM:TOO but on balance felt that the design was original, as for the damage to the work I don't see how that can change the fact it is copyrightable, if it had been flattened out of recognition then yes, but it is still clear what it is. LGA talkedits 12:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
This picture is a derivative work from a photo taken by ME. The author is ME. The source is ME. The permission is ME.
The original photo taken by ME: http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/tour-del-bernabeu-13-784190.JPG
--Badefa (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- The cup is not a photo taken by you. It is a metallic item created by someone else. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unless it can be shown the cup is out of copyright in Spain, FOP-Spain does not allow for indoor pictures. LGA talkedits 19:12, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted as derivative work of a three-dimensional metallic item which is, most likely, still under copyright. odder (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)