Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
porque lo hice mal Mc 321 (talk) 02:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 05:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
En la página, al buscar mierda sale esta imagen con las demas con un comentario racista. 85.57.19.33 13:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly (my Spanish isn't very good), you're complaining that there is a racist comment on the description page? I have removed that comment (which you could have done as well). Is there another reason to delete? darkweasel94 13:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy-kept, as obviously misguided request. (Both the earlier racist comment and the DR were by IPs from the same country.)-- Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Considering User talk:Avichay (several copyvios, 1 block and this related log): per COM:PRP IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (missing EXIF etc.) so this one can't be believed either. Gunnex (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
orphaned image, meaningless, without any educational purpose L736E (talk) 12:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, very bad quality and orphan picture, the same concept could be represented by hundreds of better images that we have, it clearly fall outside of Commons' project scope. If the user nick refers to the user's age (and the subject of the image), we could also have problems due to that. --Lucas (msg) 16:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- The image who I upload is an example of the gummy smile, then why remove it?--Nicolacci098 (talk) 11:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- @Nicolacci098, per Commons:Country specific consent requirements the law of Italy requires the consent of the depicted person before publication (which you did by uploading it), the more when the image shows a minor. --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Because it's useless and because all your interventions on it.wiki where you uploaded the pictures as an example of a fake definition of your invention were rolled back as non-sense. And also this picture, doesn't represent anything different than a normal smile. NOTE: User:Nicolacci098 was indefinitely blocked on it.wiki for escaping from the ban (reiterate insertion of meaningless and fake contents). This image has nothing to do with any kind of educational purpose, just a support to an user who likes playing with the project.--L736E (talk) 12:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC) P.S. A CU on it.wiki revealed that the user Nicolacci098 is a multiple identity (sockpuppet) of user User:CarNik98 who uploaded the picture.
Deleted: speedied as out of scope FASTILY 22:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
The light sculptures of one of the pics taken in France was made by Buren who is still alive. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 23:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 08:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Statue of mascot in Japan. No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. Vantey (talk) 06:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no FOP in Japan FASTILY 03:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Category:Les Anneaux (Buren)
[edit]- File:Les Anneaux (Estuaire, Nantes) (7717469554).jpg
- File:Les Anneaux (Estuaire, Nantes) (7717473276).jpg
- File:Les Anneaux de nuit (Estuaire, Nantes) (7717470502).jpg
- File:Les anneaux1.jpg
- File:Nantes anneaux Buren 1.jpg
- File:Nantes anneaux Buren 2.jpg
_(7717469554).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7717473276).jpg){kind=link}
_(7717470502).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
fr:Daniel Buren, artist, is still alive. Those pictures are taken in France. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 23:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. russavia (talk) 03:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)- Delete Heric (talk)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Info shortly after upload, related article speedy deleted in dewiki. Gunnex (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The font is very small, map is therefore partly not readable. No good legend. File is not used. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Personal file, irrelevant UA31 (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
What the ? TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unusably low resolution and no verifiable source information. The uploader only provided a temporary search result link instead of a stable link as described at Commons:Picasa Web Albums files#Linking to a Picasa file. The search results include files published under non-free Creative Commons licenses. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete {{Picasareview}} would not passed. Gunnex (talk) 22:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not a helpful nomination reason. But I swear it was bigger when I first uploaded that. I uploaded it as part of a set I think. Flickrworker (talk) 22:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Not artistic, merely crap. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Archivo duplicado e innecesario. El correcto es "Bandera de Domingo Pérez (Granada).svg" Erlenmeyer (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Based on user's other uploads, and the size/quality, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysterious black border. Gunnex (talk) 21:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Please reupload. The SVG file is broken. McZusatz (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Licensed as {{PD-old-100}} but no proper source is provided (original source link is no longer valid). The original author and date of creation are unknown, and as the coat or arms was probably created for the abortive restoration of the Qing dynasty in 1917 PD-old-100 probably would not apply even if we knew who created the image and when. BabelStone (talk) 11:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the research before nominating it for deletion. It was just something I uploaded as part of Wikimania in the US, last year. I took the original file desription as true and didn't bother checking it myself. You are probably right.//Hannibal (talk) 11:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
No source, no useful description, no categories. May or may not be a copyright violation, but seems to be useless anyway? El Grafo (talk) 15:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Interesting. It shows, how similar are characters and numbers to each others. But no proper source is given. "Own work" means probably "self-scanned". Taivo (talk) 10:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)- Delete Authors: Kinney, Marsetta and Showman 1966. This is written on image. Copyright violation.
- File:Feature list.JPG
- File:Confusion matrix.JPG
- File:Letter construction.jpg
- File:Confusion + model.jpg
These are copies from original file, so also copyvios. I suggest to delete them also. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Archivo duplicado. El correcto es Escudo de Domingo Pérez (Granada).svg Erlenmeyer (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Has no bonds. Unused. Have various images of this reaction, including SVG, in Category:Polyethylene DMacks (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 15:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by G.dallorto as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: I am the photographer. The person portraied kindly asked me to delete this picture for personal reasons. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Converted to DR. Image is currently in use (eventually hot-linked) on http://www.wikipink.org/index.php?title=Ritratti_di_militanti_glbt_italiani_A-L; this project should first be notified about impending deletion, as it might led to removal from their pages. -- Túrelio (talk) 05:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I am also the creator of that project, so I just deleted him from there. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Then, Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Then,
- I am also the creator of that project, so I just deleted him from there. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
A copyrighted sign matanya • talk 20:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, this file should be deleted. Hanay (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
This is a derived work of a photograph taken of Vesto Melvin Slipher c.1907. The source of the derivative should be identified as well as the context of the original photograph, which although it was taken more than 100 years ago, it is not clear if the photographer died more than 70 years ago, or whether this may require attribution, for example to an institution that retains the copyright. Slipher died in 1969, less than 70 years ago, so his works may be under copyright, which may include the original photograph if it was a work for hire. Fæ (talk) 07:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Her name's Jen, not Jan! Minusroswell (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's no reason to delete. See Commons:File renaming. darkweasel94 19:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Use {{rename}} instead. Tm (talk) 04:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. A cropped version of multiple publicity images. One may be found at http://christianmusic.about.com/od/photos/ig/Jeremy-Camp---Photo-Gallery/Jeremy-Camp-promo-2012.htm Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
This film was first published in the UK. It is unlikely that the US trailer was published before this. So the UK copyright applies to the sequences in the trailer taken from the movie. Simonxag (talk) 00:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 18:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Private photo uploaded without permission of the model. Uploader mock this boy at the description and gives personal information about him. Andreuvv (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per description most likely a personal attack image. Out of project scope (no educational purpose, not used). Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jose wanted.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Gives personal information about someone at the description. SPAM pic. Andreuvv (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW sугсго 18:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Agreed. This is very close to being a {{Speedy}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Promotional description. SPAM pic. Andreuvv (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. If in scope, may eventually need permission (non trivial text logo due to 3d effects etc.) Gunnex (talk) 22:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this architecture would be free per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 10:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I do not know the history of the structure. Doremo (talk) 10:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I've uploaded the file to the English Wikipedia as advised and the Commons file can be deleted. Doremo (talk) 10:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, passes the threshold of originality Wizardist (talk) 22:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The design of the logo is complex enough to be copyrighted. Lobo (howl?) 09:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete — In my view, all uploads by User:Fenix147741147 should be deleted due to copyright violation.--Kacir (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- e.g.: File:Stuttgartmasha2013.jpg --> source: www.tennishorts.com--Kacir (talk) 12:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Info "all User:Fenix147741147 should be deleted due to copyright violation" --> mass copyvio: all files grabbed from internet =
Done. Concerning the logo: as it is now = Delete: Fenix147741147 did not create this logo and is also not the copyright owner. But with some good spirit, it may be configurable (correcting the {{Information}}-fields) via {{PD-textlogo}}{{Trademarked}}{{PD-shape}}, based on this svg-version, as I don´t see any copyrightable complexity in this logo. Gunnex (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks copyvio done, concerning the logo I agree.--Kacir (talk) 23:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I am not able to reproduce that logo, so this is not a simple one. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused unidentified logo, in my opinion surpasses threshold of originality. The uploader's other contributions are also presented for deletion due to copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
User uploaded to create an autobiography on English Wikipedia. Serves no encyclopedic nor WMF Commons value. TParis (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
monomer structure not correct: ethylene is a double-bond (doesn't become single until the polymer forms). See File:Teflon.svg for example DMacks (talk) 19:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect and low quality. --Leyo 14:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The satellite image is not the uploader's own work. Since no source is given, we must assume that it's copyrighted. El Grafo (talk) 15:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Same problem with File:Morada do Sol Satélite.png. --Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded only for a inappropriate pt.wikipedia article. There's no reason to keep... Baseador (talk)/(contributions) 18:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused unidentified logo, surpasses threshold of originality Taivo (talk) 18:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
This image seems to originate from here (more specifically from here), where everything on the website is marked copyrighted. No evidence, that the author is the same as the one from the website. Froztbyte (talk) 21:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Isn't it copyrighted design of Jack Daniels? Anyway, very small unused photo. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal picture, no obvious educational value, no metadata (categories, useful description, etc.) Pete F (talk) 18:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Uploader doesn't seem to know where he got this image. (All the fields say "Unknown".) It's probably copied off a website. Zagalejo (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, poor quality. Probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Deletion. --Илья Яковлев (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" but grabbed from the web (low resolution). Available at slightly higher resolution here under a CC-license, but a slightly less cropped Version is also available here without a CC-license. El Grafo (talk) 12:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/7731510 (2008, © All rights reserved by Stojan Josimovic, full exif available). Tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Used as vandalism. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free, photographic work. Needs permission by the original author. A.Savin 20:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Porque esta imagen es un mal diseño de mi propiedad. Saludos Cordiales. Berposen (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Info A "bad design of my own" (mal diseño de mi propiedad) is - if in scope - not really a deletion criteria, but this file (uploaded in 2012) was apparently derivated from (example) http://takiruna.com/2011/03/31/%C2%BFque-es-exactamente-lo-andino/ (2011, .jpg, see also a high res variant from another source) and is (IMHO) too complex to configure under a (alternative) licensing via {{PD-ineligible}} etc.. Gunnex (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Deletion. --Илья Яковлев (talk) 12:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Deletion. --Илья Яковлев (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Deletion. --Илья Яковлев (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Alan1997
[edit]User Alan1997 has uploaded these photos:
They look like professional photos, but no metadata is given. I smell copyvio. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- The uploader has been blocked for uploading copyvios. Maybe worth another block. Also, worth of discussing his other uploads. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Ctthatdude
[edit]User:Ctthatdude has uploaded these photos:
- File:CTHatJeans.jpg
- File:CTCar.JPG
- File:Ctpix.jpg
- File:CTstare.jpg
- File:CTside.jpg
- File:ASTONishingPhotos25.jpg
- File:Clint3.jpg
- File:Clint12.jpg
- File:Picture of CT Taylor 1.jpg
They are all unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Proghazalsrinivas
[edit]User Proghazalsrinivas has uploaded a lot of little photos about himself:
- File:Thumb 8132 amitab.jpg
- File:Dr Ghazal Srinivas.jpg
- File:4699 brosher.jpg
- File:Dr.Ghazal Srinivas.jpg
Some of them are not used and some are used only in article proposal, which failed three times a request for creating an article, last time half years ago. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aoife Harley (talk · contribs)
[edit]no notability, article creation denied on enwiki.
- File:Bullet & Caz Couch.jpg
- File:1800 final.jpg
- File:Bullet at Alcatraz.jpg
- File:Bullet & Greg.jpg
- File:Bullet shot block.jpg
- File:HM1 Johnson.jpg
- File:Bullet retired highschool jersey.jpg
- File:Bullet Real HipHop.png
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
After today identifying around 20 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different panoramio-/flickr-/facebook/picasa-accounts, blogs etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
- File:Ermita de Nuestra Señora de la Natividad.jpg
- File:Calle del Prado.jpg
- File:Procesión del Corpus..JPG
- File:Coronas de Guarrazar.JPG
- File:Vista desde el castillo de Guadamur (Toledo).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete None of them is really interesting, so deleting them is not a big loss for Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fq kibbutz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mobile uploads with - as I could see - no content.
- File:Al - 15.png
- File:Al - 14.png
- File:Al - 13.png
- File:Al - 12.png
- File:Al - 9.png
- File:Al - 8.png
- File:Al - 7.png
- File:Al - 5.png
- File:Al - 4.png
- File:Al - 2.png
- File:Ideal.png
- File:Ftf.jpeg
- File:R.png
Gunnex (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Info: Apparently not the 1st time, the uploader had some issues with this type of upload. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Technorati.png. Gunnex (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hekar Sindi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, some files derivated from unknown source with unknown copyright issues.
Gunnex (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Modern advertisement, not {{PD-old}}. Also is this company really notable?
- File:Dolomity2.jpg
- File:Budapešť.jpg
- File:Dunajská cyklozteska.jpg
- File:Benátky.jpg
- File:Paříž- Louvre.jpg
- File:Dolomity.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly invalid licence, we cannot keep them. That's bad, because File:Benátky.jpg is interesting photo. All photos are used in cz.wiki, where the article is presented for deletion due to advertising and non-notability. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristyna.sojova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violations www.top09.cz
- File:Josef Cogan.jpg
- File:Václav Cempírek.jpg
- File:Ludmila Bubeníková.jpg
- File:František Laudát.jpg
- File:Jitka Chalánková.jpg
- File:Jan Husák.jpg
- File:Adolf Jílek.jpg
- File:Helena Langšádlová.jpg
- File:Marek Ženíšek.jpg
Ray Garraty (talk) 13:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Martin Gregora.jpg
- File:Petr Holeček.jpg
- File:Rudolf Chlad.jpg
- File:Michal Janek.jpg
- File:Ladislav Jirků.jpg
- File:Jana Kaslová.jpg
- File:Rom Kostřica.jpg
- File:Jaroslav Lobkowicz.jpg
- File:Jiří Oliva.jpg
- File:Gabriela Pecková.jpg
- File:Jiří Skalický.jpg
- File:Bořivoj Šarapatka.jpg
- File:Patricie Kotalíková.jpg
Taivo (talk) 09:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.
- File:Guitarist Maycown Reichembach.jpg
- File:Maycown Reichembach 2012.jpg
- File:Maycown Reichembach 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Is this sport club really notable?
- File:2012semifinal.JPG
- File:Trofeus.JPG
- File:Marcus e carlos.jpg
- File:Final2011.JPG
- File:Camisaatual.jpg
- File:Camisaantiga.jpg
- File:Time3.jpg
- File:Time1.jpg
- File:Time4.jpg
- File:Escudoveyk.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep There is an article about that club in pt.wiki and all these photos are used there. But the article is very bad. Maybe it gets deleted soon. Nevertheless, I would not delete these images before the article. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. No longer in use. INeverCry 00:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Nastya vakarchuk
[edit]out of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antanana (talk • contribs) 2013-05-05T21:20:18 (UTC)
This applies to File:Odessa bot.sad.jpg and File:Odessa deribasovskaya.jpg. --JuTa 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't see the purpose of this template. There is only one transclusion. The text could simply be copy/pasted. Leyo 15:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused template Jarekt (talk) 14:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Porque esta imagen es un mal diseño de mi propiedad. Saludos Cordiales. Berposen (talk) 04:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Test of a GLAMwiki collaboration project with the Science museum of Barcelona. They don't have the permission of the author and want to delete it. User asked me via email. Kippelboy (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Kolmogorov criterion dtmc.svg (SVG version) Gareth Jones (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
cropped too much; only wall, dorr&windows, not all buiding, too much light from above Jakubtr (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
no location, (very) 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 19:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Roland 19:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The quality is satisfactory. The image is not used, because the location is unidentified, but I think, that the it is totally identifiable. Therefore the image is in scope. Photo is from 1961, and there is quite few historical photos in Commons. It is good to have a free historical photo. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep How many images does Commons have of India in 1961? Not many and this image of an temple is one of them and so it has historical interest. Also subject is in scope. Reasonable quality for an analogic image, that, on the contrary of an digital images, gets dust, scratchs, fingerprints, and so there cant be expected the same quality of a image. Tm (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
no location, (very) 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 19:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. The flood seems to me man-made and therefore identifiable. That case, the event is even notable. But if this is a mistake and the event is natural, then location is practically not identifiable and non-notable. That case it's probably better to delete. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep How many images does Commons have of India in 1970? Not many and this image of an body of water is one of them and so it has historical interest. Also subject is in scope. Reasonable quality for an analogic image, that, on the contrary of an digital images, gets dust, scratchs, fingerprints, and so there cant be expected the same quality of a image. Tm (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
In short: File lacks a primary source. Long: Source is a collector site just giving an author name but no indication where this image came from so impossible to verify the PD claim. As the site modifies the images - scales them up and adds their own Exif data - it's very much possible they even have images from Commons on their site. Denniss (talk) 20:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Hi Dennis. Commons has no policy that blanket rejects images uploaded from "collector sites". You can make the exact same case against my uploads from the Imperial War Museum (they only collected the images, they did not commission them) or the Department of Defense (they only host the images that are "claimed" to be released by uploaders). At some point you have to trust someone who leaves a record of release saying they are the photographer (which is what Commons does). In the case of this photograph, the photographer is clearly named as "Leon Brooks". The terms of the website explain "Where these public domain images come from? - They come from several sources. I took some of them, and I hereby placed them in public domain. Please note, not all images are by me, I collected images from other sites/photographers which clearly claim that pictures are explicitly placed in the public domain. Where it was possible the appropriate accreditation of source/ photographer is given." The legally responsible person is Dusan Bicanski of Serbia who would be liable for claims of damages by several thousand photographers if the claims were fraudulently made.
- The site has been reorganized since my original upload, the image and the associated release statement, including the required attribution, can be found at http://www.public-domain-image.com/objects-public-domain-images-pictures/electronics-devices-public-domain-images-pictures/computer-components-pictures/200-gb-7200-rpm-ide-hard-drive.jpg.html.
- If you wish to go on a mass deletion spree for the other 14,000 images, please copy and paste in my statement here for all the others. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Fæ said it all. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable organization - single upload of user INeverCry 21:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company INeverCry 21:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 21:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no source (no source since). Please refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:200 GB 7200 rpm ide hard drive.jpg. Fæ (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no source (no source since). Refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:200 GB 7200 rpm ide hard drive.jpg. Fæ (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 22:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - empty image INeverCry 22:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of something hanging on the wall. Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Stolen, this is De Tomaso's old period publicity shot. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 22:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
zdjecie jest bezprawnie uzyte jest na nim znak copyright , prosze zdjęcie orlen areny usunąć ze strony 89.229.156.163 22:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Last upload it was created 1900 and OTRS was pending a long time - admins: compare deleted versions JuTa 23:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
OUT OF DATE, BAD IMPRESSION OF CHASE MASTERSON 2.122.221.152 16:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Argument less nomination. Image is in scope of this american actress, singer and voice actor and of Comi-Con. Being "out of date" is irrelevant and the fact that this British IP (and so much probably urrelated to Chase Masterson) thinks that this image gives a bad impression is also irrelevant and totally bogus and highly his POV. Good image of this famous person and not a bad demeanor. Tm (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
DELETEStatement from Chase Masterson - "Hello, I am writing to respectfully ask you to remove these photos from wikipedia, due to the fact that they are unnecessarily unflattering, candid shots and no longer depict my look or image. I've suffered unnecessary hardships in my career and am working hard to recoup opportunity, but these photos could be an unnecessary obstacle. I would so greatly appreciate your removing them, so as to depict an accurate and current image of me." Lemotsmith (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Tm. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
DELETEPlease remove this photo- This image does not meet the "Scope of Commons" (see Scope part 1: Files - "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.") as well as not meeting "Aim of Wikimedia Commons" ( Ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope ) Also does not comply with Wikipedia's "consent" rules, ie "Consent to have one's photograph taken does not permit the photographer to do what they like with the image. An image on Commons will have greater potential exposure than one in a photo album, on a personal Facebook, or part of a user's Flickr stream. A model, for example, may have consented to the image being taken for a personal portfolio, but not for publication on the internet. The photographer and uploader must satisfy themselves that, when it is required, the consent given is appropriate for uploading to Commons." (ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.122.221.152 (talk • contribs)
- Keep Bogus nomination for deletion from an IP address. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
I (Chase Masterson) did not give permission for this photo to be uploaded on Wikipedia when the photo was taken. I was only awake of private use for this photo. Chasemasterson (talk) 23:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please see User talk:2.122.221.152. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Argument less nomination. Image is in scope of this american actress, singer and voice actor and of WonderCon. Being "out of date" is irrelevant and the fact that this British IP (and so much probably urrelated to Chase Masterson) thinks that this image gives a bad impression is also irrelevant and totally bogus and highly his POV. Good image of this famous person and not a bad demeanor.
Yes it does meet the Scope of Commons as it is realistically useful for an educational purpose of a famous actress, singer and voice actor that has Wikipedia articles in 3 languages, so this is in scope of this convention and Chase Masterson and yes it does comply with Commons rules of consent taht this is a image of public and famous figure and this images were taken in a very public event in the USA were there is also no expectation of privacy in public space even if that person is a unknown person. Also in this image Chase Masterson is clearly in a public situation in a public space. Also there is zero proof that this british IP is someone close to this american Chase Masterson until (if any there is a proof to the contrary). Also it is very suspicious as if it is claimed that this image brought grievances to Chase Masterson she be it by a firend or would complain herself in a public forum and not by private means. Also in her website there are several images that no longer depict her look or image. Also in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chase Masterson - Comic-Con 2010.jpg "her friend" claims that this images are unflattering but "herself" claims that she didnt autorize this image to be publicly published, so what it is? Unflattering or climed to be private? This is highly suspicious to me that this DR is not by someone connected with Chase_Masterson but someone unrelated that is trying, for whatever, to get this images deleted. So this image must be kept. Also there is still another DR open on this image. Tm (talk) 02:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment IF YOU WISH TO VERIFY THAT I HAVE KNOW CHASE FOR OVER 10 YEARS and is one of her closest friend, (and YES someone in Britain CAN actually be a close friend to someone Living in the USA. ) you can email info@chasemasterson.com . My name is Allan and I live and work in the UK and the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.249.115 (talk • contribs)
User: Tm, Jacopo Werther, Wrong Wrong and Wrong. Jumping into conclusion without verification. Miss Masterson will be emailing the support team directly as requested by Túrelio to verify her statement. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemotsmith (talk • contribs)
Info The subject has contacted the volunteer response team, and I strongly believe that the request is genuine. To quote, she "did not give permission for these photos to be uploaded on Wikipedia" and "was only aware of private use for these images". Interested persons with requisite permissions can access Template:OTRS ticket. LFaraone (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Odder Alan (talk) 14:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
OUT OF DATE, BAD IMPRESSION OF CHASE MASTERSON 2.122.221.152 16:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Argument less nomination. Image is in scope of this american actress, singer and voice actor and of Comi-Con. Being "out of date" is irrelevant and the fact that this British IP (and so much probably urrelated to Chase Masterson) thinks that this image gives a bad impression is also irrelevant and totally bogus and highly his POV. Good image of this famous person and not a bad demeanor. Tm (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Tm. De728631 (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Statement from Chase Masterson - "Hello, I am writing to respectfully ask you to remove these photos from wikipedia, due to the fact that they are unnecessarily unflattering, candid shots and no longer depict my look or image. I've suffered unnecessary hardships in my career and am working hard to recoup opportunity, but these photos could be an unnecessary obstacle. I would so greatly appreciate your removing them, so as to depict an accurate and current image of me." Lemotsmith (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Tm. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Please remove this photo- This image does not meet the "Scope of Commons" (see Scope part 1: Files - "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.") as well as not meeting "Aim of Wikimedia Commons" ( Ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope ) Also does not comply with Wikipedia's "consent" rules, ie "Consent to have one's photograph taken does not permit the photographer to do what they like with the image. An image on Commons will have greater potential exposure than one in a photo album, on a personal Facebook, or part of a user's Flickr stream. A model, for example, may have consented to the image being taken for a personal portfolio, but not for publication on the internet. The photographer and uploader must satisfy themselves that, when it is required, the consent given is appropriate for uploading to Commons." (ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.122.221.152 (talk • contribs)
I (Chase Masterson) did not give permission for this photo to be uploaded on Wikipedia when the photo was taken. I was only awake of private use for this photo. Chasemasterson (talk) 23:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please see User talk:2.122.221.152. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Yes it does meet the Scope of Commons as it is realistically useful for an educational purpose of a famous actress, singer and voice actor that has Wikipedia articles in 3 languages, so this is in scope of this convention and Chase Masterson and yes it does comply with Commons rules of consent taht this is a image of public and famous figure and this images were taken in a very public event in the USA were there is also no expectation of privacy in public space even if that person is a unknown person. Also in this image Chase Masterson is clearly in a public situation in a public space.
Also there is zero proof that this british IP is someone close to this american Chase Masterson until (if any there is a proof to the contrary). Also it is very suspicious as if it is claimed that this image brought grievances to Chase Masterson she be it by a firend or would complain herself in a public forum and not by private means. Also in her website there are several images that no longer depict her look or image. Also in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chase Masterson - Comic-Con 2010.jpg "her friend" claims that this images are unflattering but "herself" claims that she didnt autorize this image to be publicly published, so what it is? Unflattering or climed to be private? This is highly suspicious to me that this DR is not by someone connected with Chase_Masterson but someone unrelated that is trying, for whatever, to get this images deleted. So this image must be kept. Tm (talk) 02:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment IF YOU WISH TO VERIFY THAT I HAVE KNOW CHASE FOR OVER 10 YEARS and is one of her closest friend, (and YES someone in Britain CAN actually be a close friend to someone Living in the USA. ) you can email info@chasemasterson.com . My name is Allan and I live and work in the UK and the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.249.115 (talk • contribs)
- Keep Bogus nomination for deletion from an IP address. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
User: Tm, Jacopo Werther and Taivo, Wrong Wrong and Wrong. Jumping into conclusion without verification. Miss Masterson will be emailing the support team directly as requested by Túrelio to verify her statement. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemotsmith (talk • contribs)
Info The subject has contacted the volunteer response team, and I strongly believe that the request is genuine. To quote, she "did not give permission for these photos to be uploaded on Wikipedia" and "was only aware of private use for these images". Interested persons with requisite permissions can access Template:OTRS ticket. LFaraone (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Odder Alan (talk) 14:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Sebastian1203
[edit]User Sebastian1203 has uploaded a lot of low-quality photos. These are not yet presented for deletion:
- File:PIC 0424Erregter Penis und Samenflüssigkeit.JPG
- File:PIC 0429 Sperma.JPG
- File:PIC 0472 My Cum.JPG
They are all unused and in Category:Semen are better pictures. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete the first two, Keep the last one, the quality is decent. Handcuffed (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. The cum pic is "decent"? Look at the background in the preview. It's noisy as hell. And that's not the full resolution.
- I suspect bad gamma correction? Please upload unedited pic, that could be salvageable.
- sorry, forgot to sign. 217.255.157.169 08:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all of them --Isderion (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Three lousy sex pictures. Mangoe (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
OUT OF DATE, BAD IMPRESSION OF CHASE MASTERSON 2.122.221.152 16:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Argument less nomination. Image is in scope of this american actress, singer and voice actor and of WonderCon. Being "out of date" is irrelevant and the fact that this British IP (and so much probably urrelated to Chase Masterson) thinks that this image gives a bad impression is also irrelevant and totally bogus and highly his POV. Good image of this famous person and not a bad demeanor. Tm (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
DELETEStatement from Chase Masterson - "Hello, I am writing to respectfully ask you to remove these photos from wikipedia, due to the fact that they are unnecessarily unflattering, candid shots and no longer depict my look or image. I've suffered unnecessary hardships in my career and am working hard to recoup opportunity, but these photos could be an unnecessary obstacle. I would so greatly appreciate your removing them, so as to depict an accurate and current image of me." Lemotsmith (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Tm. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
DELETEPlease remove this photo- This image does not meet the "Scope of Commons" (see Scope part 1: Files - "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.") as well as not meeting "Aim of Wikimedia Commons" ( Ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope ) Also does not comply with Wikipedia's "consent" rules, ie "Consent to have one's photograph taken does not permit the photographer to do what they like with the image. An image on Commons will have greater potential exposure than one in a photo album, on a personal Facebook, or part of a user's Flickr stream. A model, for example, may have consented to the image being taken for a personal portfolio, but not for publication on the internet. The photographer and uploader must satisfy themselves that, when it is required, the consent given is appropriate for uploading to Commons." (ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.122.221.152 (talk • contribs)
- Please see User talk:2.122.221.152. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Yes it does meet the Scope of Commons as it is realistically useful for an educational purpose of a famous actress, singer and voice actor that has Wikipedia articles in 3 languages, so this is in scope of this convention and Chase Masterson and yes it does comply with Commons rules of consent taht this is a image of public and famous figure and this images were taken in a very public event in the USA were there is also no expectation of privacy in public space even if that person is a unknown person.
- Also in this image Chase Masterson is clearly in a public situation in a public space. Also there is zero proof that this british IP is someone close to this american Chase Masterson until (if any there is a proof to the contrary). Also it is very suspicious as if it is claimed that this image brought grievances to Chase Masterson she be it by a firend or would complain herself in a public forum and not by private means. Also in her website there are several images that no longer depict her look or image. Also in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chase Masterson - Comic-Con 2010.jpg "her friend" claims that this images are unflattering but "herself" claims that she didnt autorize this image to be publicly published, so what it is? Unflattering or climed to be private? This is highly suspicious to me that this DR is not by someone connected with Chase_Masterson but someone unrelated that is trying, for whatever, to get this images deleted. So this image must be kept. Tm (talk) 02:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment IF YOU WISH TO VERIFY THAT I HAVE KNOW CHASE FOR OVER 10 YEARS and is one of her closest friend, (and YES someone in Britain CAN actually be a close friend to someone Living in the USA. ) you can email info@chasemasterson.com . My name is Allan and I live and work in the UK and the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.249.115 (talk • contribs)
- Keep Bogus nomination for deletion from an IP address. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
User: Tm, Jacopo Werther and Taivo, Wrong Wrong and Wrong. Jumping into conclusion without verification. Miss Masterson will be emailing the support team directly as requested by Túrelio to verify her statement. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemotsmith (talk • contribs)
Info The subject has contacted the volunteer response team, and I strongly believe that the request is genuine. To quote, she "did not give permission for these photos to be uploaded on Wikipedia" and "was only aware of private use for these images". Interested persons with requisite permissions can access Template:OTRS ticket. LFaraone (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Odder FASTILY 23:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
OUT OF DATE, BAD IMPRESSION OF CHASE MASTERSON 2.122.221.152 16:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Argument less nomination. Image is in scope of this american actress, singer and voice actor and of WonderCon. Being "out of date" is irrelevant and the fact that this British IP (and so much probably urrelated to Chase Masterson) thinks that this image gives a bad impression is also irrelevant and totally bogus and highly his POV. Good image of this famous person and not a bad demeanor. Tm (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
DELETE Statement from Chase Masterson - "Hello, I am writing to respectfully ask you to remove these photos from wikipedia, due to the fact that they are unnecessarily unflattering, candid shots and no longer depict my look or image. I've suffered unnecessary hardships in my career and am working hard to recoup opportunity, but these photos could be an unnecessary obstacle. I would so greatly appreciate your removing them, so as to depict an accurate and current image of me." Lemotsmith (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Tm. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
DELETE Please remove this photo- This image does not meet the "Scope of Commons" (see Scope part 1: Files - "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.") as well as not meeting "Aim of Wikimedia Commons" ( Ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope ) Also does not comply with Wikipedia's "consent" rules, ie "Consent to have one's photograph taken does not permit the photographer to do what they like with the image. An image on Commons will have greater potential exposure than one in a photo album, on a personal Facebook, or part of a user's Flickr stream. A model, for example, may have consented to the image being taken for a personal portfolio, but not for publication on the internet. The photographer and uploader must satisfy themselves that, when it is required, the consent given is appropriate for uploading to Commons." (ref: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.122.221.152 (talk • contribs)
- Please see User talk:2.122.221.152. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Yes it does meet the Scope of Commons as it is realistically useful for an educational purpose of a famous actress, singer and voice actor that has Wikipedia articles in 3 languages, so this is in scope of this convention and Chase Masterson and yes it does comply with Commons rules of consent taht this is a image of public and famous figure and this images were taken in a very public event in the USA were there is also no expectation of privacy in public space even if that person is a unknown person.
- Also in this image Chase Masterson is clearly in a public situation in a public space. Also there is zero proof that this british IP is someone close to this american Chase Masterson until (if any there is a proof to the contrary). Also it is very suspicious as if it is claimed that this image brought grievances to Chase Masterson she be it by a firend or would complain herself in a public forum and not by private means. Also in her website there are several images that no longer depict her look or image. Also in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chase Masterson - Comic-Con 2010.jpg "her friend" claims that this images are unflattering but "herself" claims that she didnt autorize this image to be publicly published, so what it is? Unflattering or climed to be private? This is highly suspicious to me that this DR is not by someone connected with Chase_Masterson but someone unrelated that is trying, for whatever, to get this images deleted. So this image must be kept. Tm (talk) 01:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment IF YOU WISH TO VERIFY THAT I HAVE KNOW CHASE FOR OVER 10 YEARS and is one of her closest friend, (and YES someone in Britain CAN actually be a close friend to someone Living in the USA. ) you can email info@chasemasterson.com . My name is Allan and I live and work in the UK and the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.249.115 (talk • contribs)
- Keep Bogus nomination for deletion from an IP address. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
User: Tm, Jacopo Werther and Taivo, Wrong Wrong and Wrong. Jumping into conclusion without verification. Miss Masterson will be emailing the support team directly as requested by Túrelio to verify her statement. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemotsmith (talk • contribs)
Info The subject has contacted the volunteer response team, and I strongly believe that the request is genuine. To quote, she "did not give permission for these photos to be uploaded on Wikipedia" and "was only aware of private use for these images". Interested persons with requisite permissions can access Template:OTRS ticket. LFaraone (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Odder FASTILY 23:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Commons fair use upload bot as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: concerns over copyright, move back to enWP. Copies uploaded to en.wikipedia.org as fair use candidates. Denniss (talk) 17:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, I've asked about the donation to Headland Archaeology Ltd. If they answer me I'll give you some news about it. Thank you, --Nachosan (talk) 21:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. If Headland Arhaeology agrees to donate the file, please email that agreement to COM:OTRS FASTILY 23:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
copyvio of this page : http://www.moleiro.com/fr/facsimile-books.htm Mel22 (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Although I do not understand French at all, in my opinion the book is from 14th or 15th century and so its copyright is expired. The photo itself has no copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- This is not a copy of a 2D work of art. This is a non-free photo of a book taken on Internet. It would be just a copy of a 2D single page of this book, PD-Art License could apply, not with this photo. Mel22 (talk) 20:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY 23:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
No permission, probably not own work. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- That's an old photo I have in my house. The people in the picture are my grandfather and his brother. (Esa es una foto antigua que tengo en mi casa. Las personas que apareces son mi abuelo y su hermano). --Jcsaaver (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do you have any information about the photographer? Having the picture of holding the copyright are two different things. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- No, I have no other information about the photographer, only that in the back side is written with a pen: "En Pedro de Valdivia 14-V-1951".--Jcsaaver (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- I looked at Template talk:PD-Chile for possibilities to add a PD-license, and I'm not sure if reason C3 could be applied. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe this could be applied: Works published anonymously, under a pseudonym or the author is unknown: if they were first published before September 16, 1962.--Jcsaaver (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- After a closer look I think this template is fine. I added PD-Chile to the image and cancel the nomination. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:09, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe this could be applied: Works published anonymously, under a pseudonym or the author is unknown: if they were first published before September 16, 1962.--Jcsaaver (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- I looked at Template talk:PD-Chile for possibilities to add a PD-license, and I'm not sure if reason C3 could be applied. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- No, I have no other information about the photographer, only that in the back side is written with a pen: "En Pedro de Valdivia 14-V-1951".--Jcsaaver (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do you have any information about the photographer? Having the picture of holding the copyright are two different things. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Relatives (daughters) to the people in the picture asked me to delete it. Jcsaaver (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Courtesy delete -FASTILY 23:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:JORGE DENEGRE con sus NIETAS y secretria en su salón de bibliografía en su Biblioteca..jpeg
- File:AGUSTÌN MILLARES CARLO FILÒLOGO LATINISTA POLÌGRAFO.jpeg
- File:Biblioteca JORGE DENEGRE VAUGHT PEÑA, literatura mexicana, arte,cultura universal.JPG
- File:Javier wimer.jpg
- File:JORGE Y JACOBO.jpg
- File:Jorge Denegre Vaught Peña.jpg
INeverCry 21:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Delete all except possibly File:Javier wimer.jpg. The others appear to be commercial images or are low quality. Mangoe (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value
INeverCry 21:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not here to publish people's pop art. Mangoe (talk) 00:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 21:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logos of non-notable company - single uploads of user
INeverCry 21:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Misra auto (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Misra.jpg
- File:Lovato Misra.jpg
- File:LPG Tank.jpg
- File:Misra LPG CNG.jpg
- File:Misra Kit Fitting.jpg
- File:LPG Kit.jpg
INeverCry 22:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: l FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
As you can see from the difference betwen File:Micropenis.jpg and File:Medical Exam of Male with Micropenis.jpg, there is a watermark (Shown at www.Redclouds.com) which has been removed, which make all these suspect.
- File:Ejaculation of Penis.jpg
- File:Male Rectal Exam.jpg
- File:Micropenis with Vitiligo.jpg
- File:Glans Penis Exam.jpg
- File:Male Perineum and Anus.jpg
- File:Medical Exam of Male with Micropenis.jpg
- File:Micropenis.jpg
- File:Vitiligo on Penis.jpg
- File:Manual Stimulation of Penis.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 07:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for responding. Can you please follow COM:OTRS. This would make the whole discussion much shorter. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sfranz9873 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
- File:Bouquet products Tarrago.jpg
- File:TARRAGO MANRESA SPAIN PLANT.jpg
- File:The-leather-care-tarrago-p.jpg
INeverCry 21:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zishanshaikh58 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - no educational value - low quality
INeverCry 22:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images/logos
INeverCry 22:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
imho that flickr transfer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please see also the mentioned 'expression on the girl's face', Roland 19:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Roland 19:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Good image, we need more like that. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- CommentThe picture is taken in a public place and there is nothing embarrassing about it, as far as I'm able to apprehend. Hence, it's legal to publish under the law of India. It can also be reminded that the subjects are children who are very, very unlikely to be identified, especially as they are now seven years older than they were on the picture. --Jonund (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
The image is clearly a scan of a book (you can see though the page the text in the opposite page). As it's a 3D object, a photograph of said 3D object is not in the public domain (regardless of how old the object is). If it were a 2D work, it would be OK, but that´s not the case (it's clearly explained in Commons:Image_casebook#3D_art_.28sculptures_etc..29 or Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#This_does_not_apply_to_photographs_of_3D_works_of_art) The Comeback Kid (talk) 18:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Propongo que la imagen no sea borrada por el momento, ya que estoy intentando hablar con el propietario de la misma. Desconozco cuánto tiempo tardará el dueño en responder.--Lancastermerrin88 (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:Erase Las cosas se hacen al revés, primero se obtine permiso y despues se sube.
- (google tralation) Things are done in reverse, first it's overwhelming and then climbs permission.Jcfidy (talk) 16:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment In fact, as the uploader acknowledges, the picture has been taken from the Internet (see here). --The Comeback Kid (talk) 22:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22
- 26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Armando Wilson
[edit]- File:Suburban logotipo.png
- File:A.W.jpg
- File:16 logo zip.jpg
- File:16 logo prolaps.jpg
- File:Didier Sachs Logo.png
- File:Header-logo.e.jpg
- File:CR..jpg
- File:Bésame México (logo).jpg
- File:Logotipo..png
- File:Bésame..jpg
- File:EFE.png
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation for multiple logos. --Götz (talk) 20:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - at least most of them are clearly ineligible for copyright - Jcb (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete... but not as "own work" by fake copyright owner Armando Wilson, who grabbed the files from internet (except File:A.W.jpg, which is individualized enough and is used on his user page). For keeping the files, real information of copyright ownership is needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- You are wrong. If a file is ineligible for copyright, no copyright information needs to be provided. Jcb (talk) 16:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Jcb. Header-logo.e.jpg is a tough one, but I am able myself reproduce all others, so they are simple logos. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted File:Header-logo.e.jpg, which met the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. Kept all other nominated files, which didn't meet that threshold. I've replaced the copyright and licensing information on the file description pages accordingly. Mathonius (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
This is a crop of an image previously deleted from Commons, refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Babek monument.JPG. There seemed minimal discussion in the last DR before closure by Fastily, and there was no apparent explanation of the age of the statue itself, consequently I am not clear if there is any copyright to be concerned about for Freedom of Panorama to be a relevant claim. If this is a work in-copyright then it should be deleted, if someone can explain the provenance of the statue, then there may be a good reason for the original, larger image, to be un-deleted. Fæ (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No freedom of panorama in Azerbaidzhan. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Taivo, the point of the nomination was not a question of FoP, but of whether the statue has any copyright to be worried about. --Fæ (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright term in Azerbaijan is 70 years. Unless it can be determined that the sculptor died more than 70 years ago, this file should be deleted. De728631 (talk) 13:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Taivo, the point of the nomination was not a question of FoP, but of whether the statue has any copyright to be worried about. --Fæ (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Still copyrighted FASTILY 20:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, poor quality. Probably out of COM:SCOPE. A.Savin 20:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep He was referee in European championship in football, so he is notable, and we have no better photos about him. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's 2013, none of the language wikipedias has an article about him so far, really notable? --A.Savin 16:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think yes. There are a lot of missing articles. For example, Premier League footballers are well covered, but when I started to investigate Serie A, then I was surprised, how many footballer articles are missing. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's 2013, none of the language wikipedias has an article about him so far, really notable? --A.Savin 16:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this file is currently covered by our project's scope, because: 1. It is in use on the Russian Wikipedia (here), though this isn't a strong argument, since better pictures of other referees would probably be more useful there. 2. There's no better picture of this person available. I'd rather have a poor quality image of someone than no picture at all. 3. It might be usable in the future for articles about him. Taivo's argument that Faverani might be notable as a referee in an important soccer match remains unrefuted, because the lack of articles about this person (mentioned in A.Savin's response) doesn't necessarily mean he's not notable. Also note that he was a referee in the Champions League finale this year. Besides that, Commons ideally doesn't decide about notability. Mathonius (talk) 03:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Francisco A. Arredondo, motor transportation operator, 2nd Platoon, Battery B, Battalion Landing Team 3-5, 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, toasts bread on the mess deck of USS Rushmore 130425-M-VZ265-010.jpg
[edit]
Private photograph - Wikimedia Commons is no image host for such photos 178.7.239.19 14:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- "Private photograph"? — this is an officially released U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Timothy Childers. --Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep in scope as an illustration of life for those in active service on USS Rushmore. Taken by a United States marine, and consequently published by the U.S. Government as public domain rather than "private". Prosaic it may seem, but this is currently one of apparently two photographs of daily life on-board the ship available at Category:Aboard USS Rushmore (LSD-47) where marines are not actively engaged in core official duties. --Fæ (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep Clearly in scope of USMC and USS Rushmore. Tm (talk) 04:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete Equal where this image was published. Especially defenseimagery.mil hosts tons of images which should not get on Commons. I severly doubt that this one can be used for educational purposes - unless there is an article about toast breads on US warships. --High Contrast (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Commons has no policy for deleting images because they are not "encyclopedic", if you wish to change scope, I suggest you take it up on the policy page. --Fæ (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, a simple typo provoked you for your comment. --High Contrast (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the apology. --Fæ (talk) 15:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, a simple typo provoked you for your comment. --High Contrast (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with High Contrast, no educational use is possible. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep We have a whole Category:Military life, and this image fits in there. De728631 (talk) 13:38, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Clearly educational in my view, per the comments of Fae. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kedar Joshi
[edit]Unused personal photos. The subject seems to have articles on various Wikipedia and thus these images should be kept even if not used. But notability on of his has been challenged and those articles have been deleted. Examples Wikiquote, Wikiversity, English Wiki. Also note that on en wiki the closing admin summerized it as "Highly promotional". I am seeing that Commons is also being used for such promotion by uploading all these photos.
- File:Kedar Joshi (sometime between 1998 and 2001).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi at a young age, with his family (1).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi at a young age, with his family (2).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi at a young age, with his family (3).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi at a young age, with his family (5).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi with his sister (pic 1).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi with his sister (pic 2).jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi with his sister (pic 3).jpg
- File:KedarJoshiOn15September2009InPuneIndia.jpg
- File:KedarJoshiOn15September2009InPuneIndia2nd.jpg
- File:KedarJoshi2005 in Cambridge.jpg
- File:KedarJoshiInNovember2002InRatnagiriMaharashtraIndia.jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi on 30 August 2011 in Pune, India (1).jpg
- File:KedarJoshiOn30August2011InPuneIndia.jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi's Horoscope in English.jpg
- File:Kedar Joshi's Horoscope.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I uploaded all these photos only because I consider him notable; and there are others too, e.g. w:ta:கேதார் ஜோஷி, w:pa:ਕੇਦਾਰ ਜੋਸ਼ੀ. But if these unused pictures are really not useful for the project, maybe they should be deleted. ~ RogDel (talk) 07:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Has articles in several Wikipedias (d:Q55704) - no reason to delete as long as these articles aren't deleted. darkweasel94 09:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I know that deleting images when articles are already present is quite a lame reason. But this person has been proven non-notable on various projects. Its so that i dont know other languages and hence am finding it difficult to get deletion reviews started on other wikis. But 3 major high-traffic wikis (en wiki, Wikiquote and Wikiversity) are already considering him non-notable. In that case, these images are like a personal album or Facebook which doesn't fit in our scope. Also note that currently i am nominating only non-used images on grounds that they are promotional. And there is a very good reason to consider them as promotional. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Different Wikipedias can, and do, have different notability criteria. Even if an image is not in actual use, it can be useful for readers of a Wikipedia who see the link to the Commons category and look for more photos there. I'd say that photos of a person who is considered notable in at least one project can be considered educational. darkweasel94 10:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I know that deleting images when articles are already present is quite a lame reason. But this person has been proven non-notable on various projects. Its so that i dont know other languages and hence am finding it difficult to get deletion reviews started on other wikis. But 3 major high-traffic wikis (en wiki, Wikiquote and Wikiversity) are already considering him non-notable. In that case, these images are like a personal album or Facebook which doesn't fit in our scope. Also note that currently i am nominating only non-used images on grounds that they are promotional. And there is a very good reason to consider them as promotional. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Useful for an educational purpose in its broad meaning. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- {{Let's Delete both horoscope pictures, they are not used anywhere. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete the horoscope pictures for sure. I also question whether the uploader to the archive has rights to the childhood photos. The others are dubious: there is in fact only one or two Wikipedia versions which actually have a real article; he's been deleted from several, and the others are mostly blanked. Mangoe (talk) 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping most of them on the basis (at least) of the current article on Wikibooks (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Kedar_Joshi). Deleting the two unused horoscope images as they seem pretty far removed from any realistic educational use. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Claudia Kressin
[edit]- File:SMX Raum01.jpg
- File:SMX Raum02.jpg
- File:SMX Raum03.jpg
- File:SMX Raum04.jpg
- File:SMX Raum05.jpg
- File:SMX Raum06.jpg
- File:SMX Raum07.jpg
- File:SMX Raum08.jpg
- File:SMX Raum09.jpg
- File:SMX Raum10.jpg
- File:SMX von Sueden.jpg
- File:SMX Luftbild Dom 2013.jpg
Not the uploader's own work, so we need permission from the copyright holder via Commons:OTRS --El Grafo (talk) 12:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- The issue is about to be processed under Ticket:2013061010005011, so no deletion is necessary. Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:43, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Great! I had guessed she already had some kind of permission and pointed her to OTRS on her talk page at de. Hope everything turns out to be alright … --El Grafo (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to the issue of the StiftsMuseum. Think that everything is correct and okay now. Claudia
- Keep Thanks, looks good now. --El Grafo (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
problem fixed -FASTILY 20:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
I don't see a reason why not to use Template:Information instead. Leyo 15:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The template is used at the moment. Lets replace it in all the current files and wait a few weeks to see if it is being used or not. I have deleted templates like that before only to find out that some process for moving files from local wikipedias relies on it. --Jarekt (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- After having removed the transclusions of the completely empty template, there are just nine transclusions left. --Leyo 17:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: All transclusions removed. Redundant to Template:Information FASTILY 02:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)