User talk:Wizardist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wizardist!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

That won't work. You'll need to retrace the plan in SVG in Inkscape. Currently, the SVG references a PNG file /home/wizardist/temp/Windsorcastleplan.png, which exists only locally on your computer (I presume it's a local copy of File:Windsorcastleplan.png). You must redraw this in SVG if you want your drawing to display fine. Lupo 15:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try. I thought Inkscape won't save hidden layers. --Wizardist (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Wizardist!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b4f7882989fdef67a1af35ce3777fe12

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! b4f7882989fdef67a1af35ce3777fe12 Wizardist (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

be and be-tarask

[edit]

Okay, quick explanation:

1. If we don't have a translation for a language, having a fallback of a very similar dialect of that language is better than the default fallback of English. (Calling it a dialect is simplifying the matter a bit in this case, of course: be-tarask is actually one of two popular variants of the writing style for Belarusian.) 2. Advanced options are some MotD tweaks. At the moment, the only one is thumbtime, which is used in videos to choose what frame is displayed before the user hits the play button.

Basically, the edit was meant to provide a far more helpful default. Hope that helps Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aksm-420 vitovt vitebsk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 13:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:20070604 DetiDetej photo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:20070604 DetiDetej photo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Art-top (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philately/be-tarask has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

70.248.118.145 21:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Skyscrapercity.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Skyscrapercity.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bidgee (talk) 05:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've just forwerd SSC's ownder permission to use this in Wikimedia projects to OTRS. Wizardist (talk) 10:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have 48 hours to make changes. -FASTILY (TALK) 21:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Wizardist (talk) 11:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Protection reapplied. You're welcome. Cheers, FASTILY (TALK) 18:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Template:PD-USGov-NASA/be-tarask has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

166.216.226.92 05:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Номинатор переименования не может подводить сам итог своего обсуждения

[edit]

Это как?. К тому же частично высказались участники белорусской ВП, не имеющие полезного вклада на Коммонз. Это что?. --Vizu (talk) 18:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Я не делал бы этого, если бы не знал, что я делаю. Я создал обсуждение категории, пригласил вас к дискуссии. Обычно обсуждение длится две недели. Это продолжалось (формально) два месяца. Я привёл кучу разумных аргументов в пользу варианта Pahonia, вы — ни одного. Я не играю тут в игры, а вот вам, судя по всему, очень хочется. Хочется протолкнуть какой-то POV? Для этого есть множество вики- и просто проектов, милости прошу. Wizardist (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1.Подведение итога самим номинатором нарушает правила ВП и в любой вики это запрещено. 2.Подведение участником, занявшим одну из сторон, является как минимум некорректным. 2А. Вы не администратор, не патрулирующий. На каком основании вы подвели итог? 3.Я не владею языком. 4.К дискуссии вы пригласили участников из тарашкевицы по известному принципу. 5.Когда вы меня пригласили, не было дискуссии вообще (вы поставили шаблон, а дискуссию создали потом). 6.Подведение итогов не является голосованием. 7.Вы полностью игнорировали польские источники. 8."Хочется протолкнуть какой-то POV? Для этого есть множество вики- и просто проектов, милости прошу" - нарушение ВП:НО и ВП:ЭП. Вас назвали "маргиналом"? Никогда. вы же себе позволяете такие слова, + посылать на другие проекты. Вас кто-то куда-то отправил? Нет. Вы нарушили правила ВП с формулировкой "Я не делал бы этого, если бы не знал, что я делаю", и посылаете патрулирующих на другие проекты? Отлично. --Vizu (talk) 09:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Перевести обсуждение на русский можно хоть с помощью Google Translate, поэтому большой проблемы не должно было возникнуть. Вы сделали что-то без обоснования. Было два месяца обсуждения, где можно было высказать возражения и аргументы в пользу вашего варианта. Аргументов в пользу не последовало - всё было возвращено назад. Лучше сходите на enwiki и подайте запрос на переименование Pahonia:. Если статья будет переименована в другой вариант, то будем тут уже кумекать. Мы ищем консенсус среди текущих точек зрения. Есть иные - выносите на обсуждение. Не зря этот инструмент в вики существует (не ищите тут сарказм, всё вполне серьёзно). Wizardist (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

С праздником Победы над нацистской Германией!

[edit]
Поздравляю с государственным праздником - Днём Победы!--Vizu (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Спасибо. Wizardist (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Template:PD-old/be-tarask has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.27.115.206 19:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you think you can translate this template? Thanks. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 09:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I've got the same idea a few days ago. :) Thank you for noting. Wizardist (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Minsk 850ticket bought.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Wizardist (talk) 16:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Категоризация памятников культурного наследия

[edit]

Я попытался разобраться с белорусской категоризацией, но не смог. Во-первых, есть две параллельные категории: Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Belarus и Category:Belarusian heritage monuments. Как я понимаю, во вторую сваливаются фотографии, загруженные для WLM, а в первую вы хотите включить все фотографии? Зачем тогда надо две? Все страны, включая Россию, прекрасно обходятся категориями типа Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Russia и её подкатегориями, туда же сваливаются фотографии WLM (которые я потом разбираю по частным подкатегориям и категоризую человеческим образом). Может быть, одной достаточно? Кроме того, нужны подкатегории, так как в категории памятников и известными id уже лежат несколько сот фотографий, и будут ещё, если ими не заниматься. В России сделана категоризация по субъектам РФ (то есть по Белоруссии это будут 6 областей и Минск), внутри них - по районам и городам областного подчинения. Сделать вам такую же, чтобы можно было раскидывать фотографии? Пока я видел только Минск и Гродно, причём они существуют независимо друг от друга и включены в разную систему категорий. Фотографии всё-равно когда-то придётся разбирать, и вопрос об этом встанет.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ярослав, скорее всего, когда я делал кампанию загрузки, я просто допустил ошибку, создав категорию Belarusian heritage monuments, так как не заметил другую. Если у вас есть время и желание, я бы не отказался от помощи. Что на счёт областей, то можно создать категории, а фотографии добавить ботом: в шифре у каждой цифры и буквы есть своё значение в соответствии с законом. Wizardist (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Давайте тогда так. Категорию Category:Belarusian heritage monuments сейчас трогать нельзя, так как тогда фотографии WLM вообще не будут категоризованы. После конкурса удалим. Но я сейчас тогда сделаю структуру, которая будет системой поддиректорий от Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Belarus. Пустые категории я создавать не буду (они подлежат быстрому удалению), только те, где есть фотографии. Ботом, конечно, было бы хорошо перенести, надо только не забывать, что каждая фотография должна быть не только в категории памятников культурного наследия, но и в географической (идеально населённый пункт, если нет - город или район), а также в тематической (скажем, Церкви в такой-то области). Географические категории могут быть проставлены ботом, а тематические - только руками, то есть всё равно все фотографии просматривать. Сейчас тогда начну, посмотрю, как пойдёт.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Да, согласен. Руками в любом случае придётся работать. В нашем разделе есть участники, которые следят за фотографиями Беларуси на Викискладе и создают необходимые категории для разных объектов и населённых пунктов, так что ближе к концу конкурса я напишу об этом на форуме. Wizardist (talk) 13:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Сделал структуру тут: Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Belarus. Готовы все категории по областям, плюс несколько примеров по городам и по районам. Буду работать дальше, но теперь уже не особенно торопясь. Все желающие могут включиться в работу - в идеале все категории по объектам должны иметь шаблон памятника и быть включены в соответствующую категорию, а все фотографии, для которых не нашлось пока отдельной категории - правильно категоризованы и тоже включены в соответствующие категории памятников.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо за эту правку. Забыл сразу про районы. Получается, Слуцк, как город районного подчинения, сначала надо в район, а Бобруйск, как город областного подчинения — сразу в область, а Бобруйский район — рядом в область? Wizardist (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Да, именно так. По крайней мере, так сделано в России, и вроде у вас в списках такая же логика.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Прошу прощения за задержку, я как-то надеялся, что смогу российские фотографии разобрать, но теперь уже ясно, что не смогу. Я собираюсь заняться деятельностью такого рода: [1], то есть создать категории по объектам культурного наследия по всем районам (пока Гомельской области) и вставить их в списки. Тогда бот будет сам раскидывать фотографии по категориям районов. Прежде, чем я этим займусь, посмотрите, пожалуйста, есть ли замечания - на этой стадии категорий мало, ещё не поздно их все переименовать, если надо, потом будет гораздо сложнее.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Хорошо, я тоже чуть позже подключусь. С существующими названиями категорий, думаю, всё нормально, а в случае переименования в любом случае сюда подтянутся по порядку особо усидчивые поляки, россияне и литовцы, так что лучше не трогать, пока не завоняло. Спасибо большое за помощь!
    P.S./Offtopic: А что в России не так? Слишком большие объёмы? Wizardist (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Гомельская готова, перехожу к Могилёвской. С Россией просто увеличился поток - первую неделю было около сотни некатегоризованных фотографий в день, и я с ними справлялся один, а сейчас пошло по нескольку сот, и мы даже вдвоём с трудом разбираем. Дальше будет ещё больше.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ідэі прызоў ВЛС

[edit]

Падглядзеў ідэі ўкраінцаў.

  • 1-е місце, 2-е місце, 3-е місце
  • Приз за найбільшу кількість завантажених фото (обмеження: враховується до 3 фото однієї пам'ятки) (1-3 місця)
  • Приз за найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток, що раніше не були представлені в проектах Вікімедіа
  • Приз за найбільшу фотографії пам’яток з найбільшої кількості населених пунктів (1-3 місця)
  • Приз «симпатія вікіпедистів» (1-3 місця)

Іншыя намінацыі ў іншых Віках:

  • найбільше фото прийнятної якості (WLM PL, WLM NL)
  • найбільше фото для пам’яток, які раніше були без фото (WLM PL)
  • найбільше різних пам’яток (WLM ES)
  • найкраще фото аматорською камерою (СПБ)
  • найкраще фото деталей будівлі (СПБ)
  • найкраща серія фото однієї пам’ятки (СПБ)

--Renessaince (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Wizardist,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Скайп

[edit]

Зазірні, калі ласка--Хомелка (talk) 15:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Request for removing your upwizcampeditors

[edit]

Hello Wizardist, there is a discussion about a request regarding your Upload Wizard Campaign Editor userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Requests for rights#General request. If you have a reason that your upwizcampeditor be kept, please let us know. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, — 레비Revi.

Delivered on behalf of 레비Revi by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Maskoŭski aŭtavakzał prasp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

195.50.31.213 00:14, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BNTU ship.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarash (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard campaign editor

[edit]

Hello,

I'm dropping you a message because you are a Upload Wizard campaign editor who may not have used the tool, or at least not recently. Consensus has been determined that this user right should be removed from users who are not using it or not planning on using it (see previous discussion.) If you have a reason that your upwizcampeditor be kept, please let me know below! If you think you got this message in error, please also let me know. :) ~riley via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Słucak.svg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Słucak.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 01:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]