Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/04/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_Cubana.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Mia,_Megan,_Joana,_Tara,_and_Brittney_wasn't_there_unfortunately-_They're_crazy,_funny,_and_nice-_They_will_be_posting_more_videos_soon_2013-04-16_18-42.jpg){kind=link}
Typo error in file name, a rename didn't work right, now a right named duplicate exists: File:2013-04-14 Dollendorfer Hof, Hauptstraße 113, Königswinter-Niederdollendorf IMG 4888.jpg (with "t" in "Hauptstraße") Hasenläufer (talk) 00:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Leit (talk) 06:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
I was making a test. I did not want to publish it since it is already in commons Garrondo (talk) 07:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as the uploader declared it as a test and nominated it on day of upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as it is a screen shot from the 2011 movie "Killer Elite" Bidgee (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Low quality "pull down your top and take a photo" type pic. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Sent to another DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable website INeverCry 23:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Composition of an image that can be under free licensing and a Logo that is highly probable to be under copyright restriction : [2] Loreleil (talk) 09:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Due to some reason deletion nomination failed, so reacreating it with delay :). But pretty much : composition of image under copyright restriction (logo). Loreleil ([[User talk:Loreleil|
Deleted: . JuTa 19:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
No evidence for PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 09:54, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
_Cubana.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cubana.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
see File:Cubana - Antonov An-158.jpg ze-dan (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
_Cubana.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Duplicate russavia (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
_Cubana.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality, better alternatives available, e.g. File:Metilsilkopropan.svg. Leyo 17:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- The .png has an unusual and confusing position of the methyl group and/or the bond to it. DMacks (talk) 20:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Chemical quality issues, unused, good alternative. Ed (Edgar181) 13:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:11-17_wgs.jpg Littlesnake22 (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, request by the uploader of the image. -- Cirt (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Poorer quality version of this copyrighted image. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is a copy of the flickr image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
This non-free football crest does not qualify to be on the Commons. I have taken a copy to use on en.wiki for fair use. Diannaa (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Cropped version of this wallpaper, found elsewhere on the internet. Unlikely this is the uploader's work. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is a lower quality copy of the wallpaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
A previously published image. Also, notice the watermark at the bottom right corner. A possible cpvio. Rahul Bott (talk) 03:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, watermark is the same on both images. It also shows public art. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Image available on the net atleast since Aug '12. As per source description, also taken from "local news" (media), and hence a likely cpvio. Rahul Bott (talk) 03:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
A currently unused file with very little possible future use. Seems more like a personal photo, in that case - Out of scope. Has no EXIF data and uploader has cpvio history. Should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rahul Bott (talk) 03:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Out of project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photos. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Novels may be hosted at Wikisource and this one perhaps not even there. Rahul Bott (talk) 03:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Simple text, which can possibly go to Wikisource etc. The image file here is out of project scope IMO. Rahul Bott (talk) 03:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Created by me in error, I did not realise that the file had already been validly copied from en wikipedia Andrewa (talk) 04:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Original creator requests deletion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Cette photo (issue de mon iPhone) à une orientation tournée de 90° dans le sens antihoraire. Après m'en être rendu compte une fois en ligne (toute mes excuses), j'ai fait pivoter la photo originale qui est maintenant disponible à cette adresse File:Église Notre-Dame de Calais - La nef.jpg. Inutile je pense de garder cette photo identique. Davy-62 (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per request of original uploader. Translation of above = "This photo (taken from my iPhone) to an orientation rotated 90 ° counterclockwise. After me be realized once online (all apologies), I rotated the original photo is now available here File:Église Notre-Dame de Calais - La nef.jpg. I think unnecessary to keep this same picture." Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
The fact that "it's public" does not mean that it is public domain. The linked source page says "Copyright © 2012 - 2013 ilovestyle.com" HaeB (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, there is a copyright notice on the original location. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
not own work. screen shot from a copyrigted computer-game 89.249.2.53 07:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, screenshot
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Image is visually same than this one, but not actually duplicate. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Delete per nom, redundant. Same goes for 013, 014, 015, and 016 too. Rybec (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Image is visually same than this one, but not actually duplicate. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the image is visually same although not pixel-by-pixel exactly same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Image is visually same than this one, but not actually duplicate. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Close enough that it's hard to see a reason to keep both. - Jmabel ! talk 15:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the image is visually same although not pixel-by-pixel exactly same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Image is visually same than this one, but not actually duplicate. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the image is visually same although not pixel-by-pixel exactly same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Image is visually same than this one, but not actually duplicate. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the image is visually same although not pixel-by-pixel exactly same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
new version with correct info online now Asevenema (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with original uploader's request to delete this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
new version with correct info online now Asevenema (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with original uploader's request to delete this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
not covered by FOP, this advertising poster is not a permanent installation darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 10:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:This image was taken at Rock Garden, Sector-4, Madhya Math, Chandigarh 2013-04-16 02-30.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album --High Contrast (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:If you want to see smarty khan wallpapers --Type on google smarty khan actor --You will find smarty khan wallpaper--- 2013-04-16 16-40.jpg
[edit]
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
No valid source. All images from PT Paranagua (flickr) are licensed by "All rights reserved". Alan Lorenzo (talk) 11:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Possible copyvio. example --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 11:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be solely for promoting a service. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.saam.co.nf/biography.html Kattenkruid (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
That's reduntant image, because it is similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
That's reduntant image, because it is similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
That's reduntant image, because it is similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
That's reduntant image, because it is similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
That's reduntant image, because it is similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
That's reduntant image, because it is similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
This picture is reduntant, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, because it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntat picture, similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntat picture, similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:11-17_wgs.jpg Littlesnake22 (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, request by the uploader of the image. -- Cirt (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntat file, it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: no encyclopic value and Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 17:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see http://www.alateco.ru/projects/pm82.html ze-dan (talk) 17:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the two images are the same to file name. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Capilla del Cristo de los Dolores de la Venerable Orden Tercera de San Francisco El Grande noche 22.jpg
[edit]
Reduntat file, similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Capilla del Santo Cristo de los Dolores para la Venerable Orden Tercera de San Francisco 3.jpg
[edit]
Reduntat file, similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation (promo photo). Rapsar (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works, no permission Polarlys (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Non-free logos — D Y O L F 77
[Talk] 19:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Extreme case of low quality, unused, better version available (File:Grab Rosemarie Nitribitt.jpg). A.Savin 20:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
no 'educational use', blurry, watermark, unknown location (since 2009), Roland 21:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
uploaded wrong file Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with original uploader's request to delete this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
blurry, scan, not in use, unknown location since 2009, Roland 21:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Comment I cannot see at COM:D any of the 4 reasons stated. -Aleator (talk) 20:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Its a scan, so doubtful authorship. Its not in use, so {{Out of scope}} may be. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- It is indeed a scan, it is indeed not in use, and it is true that I don't know where this was taken. As for the doubt on its authorship, it is my photo. If I had a way of proving it to you, I would. If you feel this image is not suitable for Commons, please delete it; I have no objections. MikeLynch (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope UA31 (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Bashar al-Assad, President of Syria and Regional Secretary of the Syrian-led branch of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work from the official portraits of al-Assad, which might not be in public domain. Underlying lk (talk) 21:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 22:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 22:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Personal image, Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 22:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Personal image, Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 22:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Previously published; no evidence except for a user name that the uploader is the copyright owner. Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 02:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: See nomination reasons. The user has many copyvio warnings on talk page MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Isn't a free image, is copyrighted by the Celtic Woman band most likely, and is most certainly not "marcusrulless"es own work. Gwickwire (talk) 05:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- oopsie, let's hit enter AFTER we finish next time Gwickwire (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep Yes, it is a free image, as text logos do not meet the threshold of originality. It was missing tags to clarify this though, so I have added PD-textlogo and trademark. Tarc (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: it lack sources however it's probably under threshold of originality and then PD as PD-textlogo PierreSelim (talk) 06:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Licensing mistake, material does not conform to wikibooks Creative Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiemgeorge (talk • contribs) 2013-04-09T20:24:07 (UTC)
--JuTa 12:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Licence is incorrect. This is not a free US-gov image at all MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Wrong Europe Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flappiefh (talk • contribs) 2013-04-15T21:18:08 (UTC)
--JuTa 13:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support as original uploader, because a better version File:Tour de France 1907 map-fr.svg has become available since. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The file is still in use on some wikipediae PierreSelim (talk) 06:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
yo puse esta foto Pyong Ahn (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with original uploader's request to delete this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I urge someone with more experience than myself take a look at all this uploader's images; many of them are watermarked. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request few hours after upload PierreSelim (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
quiero poner otra Pyong Ahn (talk) 16:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with original uploader's request to delete this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I urge someone with more experience than myself take a look at all this uploader's images; many of them are watermarked. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request few hours after upload PierreSelim (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative photo of modern temporarily installed poster, no possibility to apply Freedom of Panorama. A.Savin 17:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I doubt a bit whether the only original piece in the poster, the drawing in the lower right part, is above threshold-of-originality/copyrightable. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo (or drawing) at the top is copyright protected, as the is drawing at the bottom. No FOP here MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
nice but imho 'no educational use', unknow location (since 2009), Roland 21:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: A good quality photo, with what seems to be a good licence. The fact that the location is unspecified does not make it uneducational MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
wrong file Tvcontents (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Wrong File Tvcontents (talk) 21:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No copyright licence provided MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 22:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
not own work of this user - scaled down duplicate of File:Ile-des-Oiseaux.jpg, uploaded in 2007 by another user as own work INeverCry 22:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work as claimed MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
We have an SVG in the proper colours and ratio. Fry1989 eh? 22:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused apparently personally-made version of US flag. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As a copyvio-tag has been removed by the uploader, I file it for regular DR.
The image is a derivative of the photo on the poster. Commons:FOP#Poland not applicable as it is obviously not a permanent installation. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Uważam że zgodnie z Polskim prawem, fotografia została wykonana z poszanowaniem prawa autorskiego, gdyż plakat prezentowany na zdjęciu stanowi część kompozycji i został ukazany w szerszym kontekście (kadrze). Jest to moja opinia, która może być błędna, ale jako uczeń szkoły fotograficznej zapoznałem się z Prawami Autorskimi obowiązującymi w Polsce. Mateusz Opasiński
Deleted: The poster is the only subject in the composition, this is not a photo of a wall which just happens to have a poster in it. The poster is not de minimis in the composition. –moogsi (blah) 19:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As a copyvio-tag has been removed by the uploader, I file it for regular DR.
The image is a derivative of the photo on the poster. Commons:FOP#Poland not applicable as it is obviously not a permanent installation. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Uważam że zgodnie z Polskim prawem, fotografia została wykonana z poszanowaniem prawa autorskiego, gdyż plakat prezentowany na zdjęciu stanowi część kompozycji i został ukazany w szerszym kontekście (kadrze). Jest to moja opinia, która może być błędna, ale jako uczeń szkoły fotograficznej zapoznałem się z Prawami Autorskimi obowiązującymi w Polsce. Mateusz Opasiński
Deleted: The poster is the only subject; it's not de minimis in the composition. –moogsi (blah) 19:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Completing an incomplete DR:
- discrepancy description — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexusuns (talk • contribs) 2013-04-11T11:21:48 (UTC)
--JuTa 12:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: random group of kids, possible consent issue regarding republication. –moogsi (blah) 19:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Error name, right name - Category:Wrangel, Aleksandr Evstaf'evich, author requests, empty category. Gandvik (talk) 08:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. –moogsi (blah) 19:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- 不適切なファイル — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koki0605 (talk • contribs) 2013-04-16T14:12:14 (UTC)
--JuTa 12:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. –moogsi (blah) 19:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Fair Use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bibawostyle (talk • contribs) 2013-03-04T20:03:41 (UTC)
--JuTa 12:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request, unused file. –moogsi (blah) 19:19, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Ohne Beschreibung, kann nicht eingeordnet werden 84.58.133.154 18:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Das ist keine gültige Löschbegründung. No valid deletion rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: "no description" not a reason for deletion –moogsi (blah) 19:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Ohne Beschreibung, kann nicht eingeordnet werden 84.58.133.154 18:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Das ist keine gültige Löschbegründung. No valid deletion rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Kein Löschgrund vorhanden. --Ralf Roleček 20:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep indeed no valid rationale. Hekerui (talk) 22:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: "no description" not a reason for deletion –moogsi (blah) 19:24, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Нужно поменять информацию к файлу, не могу понять как. Проще перезалить Sevaegir (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: request apparently withdrawn –moogsi (blah) 19:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused text logo of non-notable company INeverCry 22:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 22:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality, random subject –moogsi (blah) 19:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 23:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable group - single upload of user INeverCry 23:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: additional concern about the watermark –moogsi (blah) 19:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: very low res –moogsi (blah) 19:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 23:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: very low res. –moogsi (blah) 19:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: very low res –moogsi (blah) 19:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 23:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional materials –moogsi (blah) 19:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: almost too small to tell, but this is a ss from a video game –moogsi (blah) 19:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful - might be a screenshot INeverCry 23:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This is a frame from the 1947 portuguese movie "O Leão da Estrela", directed by Arthur Duarte who died in 1982, so this film is not PD until at least 2053. Tm (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Tm –moogsi (blah) 19:51, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Modern 3D sculpture in US - No Freedom of Panorama - Flickr is violating copyright en:Mark Jenkins
When was this sign made? Stefan4 (talk) 23:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you read the article - it's logical that's it's around 2005. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- That's a sculpture? Anyhow, someone's claiming on the Wikipedia side that the Flickr is the artist's (en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 17#File:Flowersign.jpg), so I guess whatever is determined over there will probably decide what happens here. ALH (talk) 05:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- The information on Wikipedia looks correct, so I think that we can Keep the image. On a related note, when you are copying a Flickr file from Wikipedia, please also add {{Flickreview}} below the licence template so that someone includes a statement that the file on Flickr indeed is freely licensed. Normally, a bot will check this automatically shortly after the image is marked with this template. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- The information on Wikipedia looks correct, so I think that we can
Kept: Flickr belongs to the artist –moogsi (blah) 19:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 23:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional material –moogsi (blah) 19:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 23:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional material –moogsi (blah) 19:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:DW INeverCry 23:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, derivative work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 19:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
I think that the "own work" here probably refers to the image. The model also has its own copyright and there is no evidence of permission. -- it may be old enough to be PD, but need to know the facts. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- The model belongs to me. I made it in the basement of my house.--Charny (talk) 02:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept, Uploader's own photo of own work. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Per conclusion of this deletion request (and upheld here, here and here), photographies with {{PD-Denmark50}} must clearly state (and prove beyond a significant doubt), that the photo has been published before 1 March 1989. In this case publication-date is not clear. heb [T C E] 10:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep:
- "Med sejl damp og motor : bornholmske skibe ca. 1850-1976"
- Author: Pedersen, Erik
- Publication year: 1976
- Language: Danish
- Republished in 1998 by Bornholms Museum and Erik Pedersen (Update)
- Kind regards: --Rodejong (talk) 02:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- May I then kindly suggest, that you then put this information into the file description, so that it is clear and the file can be kept? :) In kind regards, heb [T C E] 07:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Closed as Kept; text above copied and added to image description. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Undescribed orphan personal image with no indication of in scope notability. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image/unused personal image INeverCry 22:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; also insufficient license info. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 23:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value. The uploader does not seem to understand commons's aim and scope. Frédéric (talk) 16:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
I've restored the previous version of the image - hope that carries some meaning. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC).
Poor quaility picture of possible young prostitute Treelady (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Deletions cannot be based on assumptions. If this pic of a nude lady is believed of "picture of possible young prostitute" then what's the guarantee or statement about tons of such pics here. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 05:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC).
- Keep, unique image, free use picture. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, How EXTREMELY rude, on what grounds would you be able to call her a prostitute, I hope she doesn’t read what Treelady has written,
Anyways I haven’t seen anything that merits a delation. -- Gddea - Daniel E. Als-Juliussen (talk) 16:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept - No reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belgium. 84.61.169.81 12:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- On these fish-eye photos you can see hundreds of buildings most of them very small on the photo. Also is visible a park, a parking place, etc. Does the deletion request concern these subjects? What about a photo such as File:Brussels view A.jpg? A small part of one ball of the Atomium is visible, but in my opinion is it a minor part in the total picture and should not be a reason to delete the files. Wouter (talk) 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No single subject in these photos which is not de minimis. –moogsi (blah) 19:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Hotel Baobab Resort.pdf
[edit]Promo text, not in scope. - Ganímedes (talk) 11:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: promotional content, not in scope also only text Ezarateesteban 14:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
File:I've been toying with the idea of writing a book- I read frequently and try to pick up on clever ways writers use language- Its tough to piece together a good story- While I have had other ideas in the past my mind keep 2013-04-14 19-18.jpg
[edit]
Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 11:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
File:The 5british bears, or actually 4- One was missing- Their names are (left to right) Mia, Megan, Joana, Tara, and Brittney wasn't there unfortunately- They're crazy, funny, and nice- They will be posting more videos soon 2013-04-16 18-42.jpg
[edit]_Mia,_Megan,_Joana,_Tara,_and_Brittney_wasn%27t_there_unfortunately-_They%27re_crazy,_funny,_and_nice-_They_will_be_posting_more_videos_soon_2013-04-16_18-42.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Dpreus
[edit]All files found on Special:ListFiles/Dpreuss.
Files are either including a logo, marked as copyright or out of scope. --SamuelFreli (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- The included files are :
- File:Stoos Network logo - wide.jpg
- File:Fearless Journey Game - sample.jpg
- File:StoosDialogueDoorHanger LTR.pdf
- File:StoosDialogueDoorHanger A4.pdf
- File:Stoos label.jpg
- File:Stoos bizcard recto.jpg
- File:Stoos bizcard verso.jpg
- File:Stoos Network logo - tall.jpg
- File:Stewardship of the Living logo.jpg
- File:StoosCommunique.jpg
- File:StewardshipOfTheLiving-RheinMain.jpg
- File:Stoos Communique excerpt A5.pdf
--SamuelFreli (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete agree with nominator and point out that File:Fearless Journey Game - sample.jpg contains a copyright notice. These are all logos, business cards and text files related to "Stoos". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 1adamminic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Low quality image of domesticated dog. Commons is likely to have better images of same breed.
- File:Boulder Crest Ranch Chinese Crested Powder Puff.jpg
- File:Boulder Crest Ranch Chineese Crested Powder Puff.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ambika.bot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi lauching Rabindra Chitravali.jpg
- File:Art Historian R. Siva Kumar and Critic Geeta Kapur.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 23:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegomur13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of photos from Internet, not own work.
- File:4. Vista exterior de la bodega de culto -Blecua- en una noche de invierno.jpg
- File:1. Vista de las instalaciones de Viñas del Vero, en la carretera de Barbastro a Naval.jpg
- File:2. Vista de los depósitos de fermentación en Viñas del Vero.jpg
- File:3. Viñedos de Viñas del Vero, en el corazón del Somontano, nevados.jpg
- File:5. Sala de barricas de Blecua, donde este singular vino envejece en barricas nuevas de roble francés..jpg
- File:6. Antiquísimas cepas de Garnacha en el Valle de Secastilla.jpg
- File:Antiquísimas cepas de Garnacha en el Valle de Secastilla.jpg
- File:Sala de barricas de Blecua, donde este singular vino envejece en barricas nuevas de roble francés..jpg
- File:Vista exterior de la bodega de culto "Blecua" en una noche de invierno.jpg
- File:Viñedos de Viñas del Vero, en el corazón del Somontano, nevados.jpg
- File:Vista de las instalaciones de Viñas del Vero, en la carretera de Barbastro a Naval.jpg
- File:Vista de los depósitos de fermentación en Viñas del Vero.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegomur13 -2nd time- (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploads of this user have been deleted in the past. "Looks like collection of photos from Internet, not own work."
- see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Diegomur13 The same seems to apply on these photographs.
- File:Viñedo en invierno.jpg
- File:Depósitos de fermentación.jpg
- File:Barricas.jpg
- File:Cepas.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 03:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logos of non-notable company
INeverCry 23:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional materials –moogsi (blah) 19:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kennysnowball (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Bike.png
- File:Picture Rotorua.jpg
- File:Horse trekking.png
- File:Bungy jump.jpg
- File:Black water rafting.jpg
- File:Ludge kart.jpg
- File:Bike images.png
- File:PNG images.png
- File:JPEG image.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 00:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lamarcagus (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Lamarca.jpg
- File:Lamarca historieta.jpg
- File:La marca tapa exterior e interior.jpg
- File:LA-MARCA-the-godfather.jpg
- File:Lamarca blogspot.jpg
- File:Lamarca logo facebook.jpg
- File:Lamarca fondo beatles.jpg
- File:Lamarca facebook logo.jpg
INeverCry 23:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional materials, additional concern about the copyright status of the artwork. –moogsi (blah) 19:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Highly likely not the uploader's own work: the watermark is partly visible in some of these images and besides, these images are of low resolution
High Contrast (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- The subject appears to be a professional model, so these are likely copyvios. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedrovillaf1991 (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - old BnW images that don't seem to be "own work" and some pics w/ small size - no EXIF which may not be own work either
- File:Sucesosvilla6.png
- File:Villasucesos2.png
- File:Villasucesos.png
- File:Sucesosvilla9.png
- File:Sucesosvilla8.png
- File:Sucesosvilla2.png
- File:Sucesosvilla4.png
- File:Sucesosvilla5.png
- File:Sucesosvilla.png
- File:Sucesosvilla3.png
- File:Alcoholeras.jpg
- File:Oratoriocasmarques.jpg
- File:Casallaves.jpg
- File:Lahita.jpg
- File:Casalara.jpg
INeverCry 22:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: variable age, quality and resolution, all claimed as own work, no sources. –moogsi (blah) 19:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Qa003qa003 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative work from ticket design.
- File:Hangzhou Metro single ticket 20121229 182549.jpg
- File:Hangzhou Metro single ticket 20121229 182147.jpg
- File:Hangzhou Metro single ticket 20121229 181053.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Tell you why the word delete a one-way ticket look like?--Qa003qa003 (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sakuraharuno123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos of no realistic educational use: out of project scope.
- File:Una mirada un tanto cautivadora.jpg
- File:Una foto graciosa de dora ponce.jpg
- File:Dora ponce izquierdo2.jpg
- File:Dora ponce izquierdo.jpg
Rrburke (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhmunde (talk · contribs)
[edit]All obvious copyright violations, in many cases using the pd-shape license even though the files are photographs.
- File:Bauli Sahib,Gurudwara Govindwal Sahib 1880-1900.jpg
- File:Old Rare view of Bauli Sahib,Gurudwara Govindval Sahib 1900c.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 9.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 8.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 7.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 6.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 5.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 4.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 3.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star 2.jpg
- File:Shri Akal Takht Sahib after opration Blue Star.jpg
- File:Shri Akaal Takhat Sahib or Akaal Boonga during 1858-60c.jpg
- File:Kar Sewa after Sarbat Khalsa of 29 April 1986.jpg
- File:Sarbat Khalsa 29 April 1986.jpg
- File:Re-building of the Akal Takht.jpg
- File:Re-building of the Akal Takht2.jpg
- File:Shri Darbar Sahib or Golden Temple 1864-66c.jpg
- File:--NAMESPACE--HarmindarSahib.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 14:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhmunde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Several more likely copyright violations uploaded by this user.
- File:Prince Frederick Duleep Singh.jpg
- File:Bhai Samund Singh Ragi.jpg
- File:Bhai Samund Singh Ji with Bhai Harnam Singh and Bhai Teja Singh.jpg
- File:Sardar Lehna Singh Majithia.jpg
- File:Sirdar Runjodh Singh majithia.jpg
- File:Shri Darbar Sahib(Golden Temple)1933.jpg
- File:Entrence of Shri Darbar Sahib 1875c.jpg
- File:Rani Mehtab Kaur.jpg
- File:Rani Sada Kaur.jpg
1933.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Underlying lk (talk) 21:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tamara1408 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:313140 280853385259055 659087288 n парк санатория Ай-Даниль.jpg
- File:299696 280853481925712 962799465 n парк санатория Ай-Даниль.jpg
- File:301329 280853681925692 2028328482 n парк санатория Ай-Даниль.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User1234567890 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-quality amateur porn images; not realistically useful for an educational purpose
- File:Female pubes1.jpg
- File:Female nipple.jpg
- File:Female pubes 4.jpg
- File:Female pubes 5.jpg
- File:Female pubes 3.jpg
- File:Female pubes 2.jpg
- File:Female pubes.jpg
Rrburke (talk) 19:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: all are already gone (deleted and suppressed to be precise). Trijnsteltalk 22:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ثائر مستنير (talk · contribs)
[edit]All the uploads from this user are missing source and author, and seem to be copyright violations.
- File:Nesreen Tafesh.jpeg
- File:AbdAlwahabBenYousef.jpg
- File:AlgerianWomanAlgerianGirl.jpeg
- File:MapOfShiso.jpg
- File:Flagblue.png
- File:Flagred.png
- File:Flagyellow.png
- File:Shiso.jpeg
- File:Algerian Woman2012.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 21:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Photos are from copyrighted websites (Sources are mentionned in arabic) or they are screenshots from games.
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Pictures by User:ECsonka
[edit]- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 026.jpg
- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 027.jpg
- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 028.jpg
- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 029.jpg
- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 030.jpg
- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 031.jpg
- File:PUENTE DE TOLEDO 092612 032.jpg
These pictures are reduntant, because they are similar to this one. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Per conclusion of this deletion request (and upheld here, here and here), photographies with {{PD-Denmark50}} must clearly state (and prove beyond a significant doubt), that the photo has been published before 1 March 1989. In this case publication-date is not clear. heb [T C E] 10:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Per conclusion of this deletion request (and upheld here, here and here), photographies with {{PD-Denmark50}} must clearly state (and prove beyond a significant doubt), that the photo has been published before 1 March 1989. In this case publication-date is not clear. heb [T C E] 10:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Logo of a soccer team Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 19:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:48, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work"/Creative Commons. Is it simple enought to stay as something like {{PD-shape}}? El Grafo (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 23:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 23:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused images of non-notable person
INeverCry 22:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:00, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raquel orzuj (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - collection of unused personal artwork
- File:FEMIHUMOR 0001.jpg
- File:Ms. orzuj- 35 YEARS ,CARTOONIG-.jpg
- File:BLISTER SMILE - Raquel Orzuj-Uruguay.jpg
- File:Ms orzuj.... ..jpg
- File:HUM ....ORZUJ-.jpg
- File:Egofirm with crown - ms. orzuj-.JPG
INeverCry 22:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 22:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, out of scope, and no EXIF data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:00, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Per conclusion of this deletion request (and upheld here, here and here), photographies with {{PD-Denmark50}} must clearly state (and prove beyond a significant doubt), that the photo has been published before 1 March 1989. In this case publication-date is not clear. heb [T C E] 10:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- I emailed the man who maintains the site from which I took the image and asked about its status. He informed me that it has been published in Andrew Mollo: Armed Forces of World War II, 1981. --Jonund (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Info is now on the page, so we can keep this MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Only 1 image on this flickr account. This is quite irregular. Most flickr account owners have at least 20-30 images of their own...unless , not 1, 2 or 3. Is the flickr account owner making his/her other images private? Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: I also tried to find is there any other picture I can upload but there is none and the screen shows "there's no more you can use". However, there is a conversation on that page. Person 1 asked "Is this taken by your camera?" Person 2 answered "No. This was taken by my friend. I also shot a lot. But there was problem with my memory stick on "the second" (certain day, like 2008/5/2) so everything I taken was gone." So I guess they know each other. The former wonder how the later can took the picture by self or simply wonder who took it. Then the uploader responded. I also guess maybe the person hides other pictures. Are you suggesting this image could be stolen from somewhere? Or why it should be deleted quickly? --Wildcursive (talk) 05:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: I was just wondering why the flickr account has only 1 image. This flickr account may keep his/her other images private but no one knows and I don't know Chinese. I'll pass this image but let an experienced Admin decide if it can be kept or not. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: On balance, seems OK. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Various SVGs exist, including File:Flag of Serbia 1992-2004.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have nothing against deletion per se. I am aware that there are a bunch of the same files with the same name. However, I would like to say that only for practical reasons maybe it is better to upload SVG version of that file under that name so that other editors can not question usage of that file for reference of Flag of Serbs of Croatia. True, two images are exactly the same, but I already have experience with deletion of this file on Croatian Wikipedia just because of file name. If we can overcome that, than I have nothing against deletion.--MirkoS18 (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Absolutely no source specified, user declares himself as author. Absolute unclear if this is the Picasso-Logo of the Citroen-company or a real Picasso signature. Users say that this logo is well-known precisely. but are willing to completely dispense with a reliable source. In my view that contradicts the rules for comprehensible sources. Hubertl (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It is a reproduction of one of many similar samples of Picasso signatures. Like this one . I do not remember the exact one but all look similar. I do not know exact laws for France and Spain but in most jurisdictions signatures are not copyrightable and tha car logo does not stand out in a specific way. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It's not so much the question of copyright, in this case it is important, that possibly simply a pseudo-logo by Picasso is used in different Wikipedias. And because it is so common because of Citroen, that it would be actually the correct logo for everyone. You have no source given, but you say, that it is something that is everywhere, therefore it would have to be right. Can you rule out with certainty that this logo was not a product of the advertising agency of Citroen in 1998? There is a slight resemblance to certain other logos of Picasso, but none of them is similar to your work. In fakt, we have very strong rules: Nothing without reliable source. --Hubertl (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- A new, authentic and also vectorized signature from 1977 (Publisher: DuMont) is now available. [1] --Hubertl (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Picasso_Signatur-DuMont_1977.svg){kind=link}
- Graphologically not different. Just signatures from different days. Still within definition of public domain Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- You did´nt give an answer about the source of your work. And indeed, it is different! --Hubertl (talk) 17:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- None of the human signatures or signature like writings approach a threshold of originality to be protected by copyright. By your approach I migth have used a non-authentic or fake signature as a source for svg file. Neither Picasso nor those who make fake signatures mimicking the signature of the original person can copyright a signature. PD-Signature applies. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 08:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- If I understand you correctly now, it does not matter whether I use a scan of an original logo of Picasso or whether I shall go easy, and thus draw a logo by free hand. The main thing ist, it should have a touch of similarity. Nothing more. Sources, we thus need any more. --Hubertl (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Copyright freedom is not about Picasso (the car), it is signature of about Picasso the artist. It is PD Signature. Unfortunately Picasso the car has chosen a name that is not original. It is the name of a well known artist. Second misfortune is their choise of logo. They have chosen a logo which is not original. They did not design it by themselves. It is a replica of a signature. %99 or %100 it is a replica of a public domain signature. Just compare it to logos of IBM or Coca cola. Both the names and design are original work of companies. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- If I understand you correctly now, it does not matter whether I use a scan of an original logo of Picasso or whether I shall go easy, and thus draw a logo by free hand. The main thing ist, it should have a touch of similarity. Nothing more. Sources, we thus need any more. --Hubertl (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Definietly not out of scope, which could be the only concievable reason to delete this image. FASTILY 22:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
It's been used an inappropriate license since there is no freedom of panorama in Albania (the statue is a quite recent one erected in that country), see Commons:Panorama and 'Category:Albanian FOP cases', for similar cases. So this unfortunately needs to be deleted until the works of art falls out of copyright, or law is changed.Alexikoua (talk) 22:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 2013-05-23T00:38:53 by User:INeverCry (Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Bardhyl222) JuTa 22:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)