Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/01/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
2012_KatiaKelly.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Probable copyvio - web res image of someone famous with no metadata and uploaded by a new user. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 18:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
obviously not own work; https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivKovxln_1CyvWEy-3Vv5hniQyMXm3mNeSJ6z-PtkpD55yfvjj5FrWj5yBYSBvu8f8nk7raD2aOhi5yHR9lOnf7L8J41a6vMh4inYQ6mohZgfKQ_1Gy4VVGo-ja9f8lUFGuFSwhHsam0LLJlfOETg-GQ7tb9WxoJx-ZR1YYRT9EzE54CgGaJ47nx9VM86giavR8q5YNCs1bYq-1zwUeTQ-8EkExW4hcXYPbgvOz_1bc5RewTTHc9bVUG4_1RhWnaK44TOVlJRjmsHIlybn6u1Vqrf53vlF8av2n7eiNTxR57V08HEYKnVdWA8sSCnWAiiSdXeNwMMaQADxAUD7ARI8o9pGMehot1emaWnn7VfJzFvBHoHJSmI2C86pG2ed-ew9AeWtnt1MvmxVGOE-gbZBfT9YGuPf5bEL0j2lUvbQxRmujzm3MpZ9nfxor2j0q8mJ3sV-WThSj2U0pDm--CwuB9VNeRS0mALVe7pav_1jafgFalcaLiiPsD_1YKGOdUGRGcs0h9_1-wApoCmnmVWPhiBS8RHWT9bPTUQa8Vk0WLamB8ufxUEfZQ_1Lvmx1GXsA7d2eklP-fM3rufb0rsdv_1Y2MYVrzFuRZjEtlzNiTXpHhHiFmS0-ruYZr2alWGRDUXbxwkhOxrHiLG7xPHReCo20VorEbTtRryIqHTQZ187iu-ibvTveQGkRkyjEByWTm9qggaUXNqTUHjyW5JLtIejsWT_1d5olBxNon4sylgYCXTEzTgxjzdmadRbu6dVl-F74TiCpNYmHiApzQmrlpYItnhrC3AjS7bqOmd_1zvtV-SPeEtpGEoLn6_1Q40UCl4u0MSBWGFF-nYxPlqglN0xEG5WIfLQ5MXlyA9HiC1hTZm5UNa-nGwZ2g3WR-GP4378cKU2a3AK_1z_1zaZeVtgppwJ0dim_1huEKiZ6dhTlD86Jx3o2FfpkdaDjPxqeTDCdIZpOqvSd-e5HbAWiPRQh05zxcjc2pEMYHreW3X2s_1LgiSXoYKpZ2e96M2x4B2dT-MRl0HUCOs043nrsVNwRVAP9tD_1Y-xO5gtcy9adOcblEy-H6AlDtm2kDz0ijetqmj5dcMdlkQO94L37QcQoAxPJE2PSSQX4mmkIWp_10Yj_1fUFTz1JuzMCjJSBBcrH4X8-dl1wShKZE8o6BVGjuzO50-fEPBVl5QKP1-XfJa9Jy2EQ8ksTfrQEtPSlrvZr_1KYI7jtDcCSnSvUhc3zwkRC03qvMxc8F5dg9DPPj7cnYh53dtNnZ_16jYLd-AqNLKCryIeNUEJdN6q5DDMDQqx2rx28sjcz12Qb4kdFrEx2VsJxZYHUb5zgiG5zu68Zo9YNwz8pZipEzn6Seli0MrbkiDoMPBNsqxA2crxn2Pg Túrelio (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I don't know but the flickr account has no camera metadata and only 7 pictures of the same person. Is it own work by the flickr account owner? 96.48.230.18 03:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've contacted the owner, who has publication rights of the photos, however the ones of Ivy Queen performing he does not. I've looked all over the internet, and the photo in question has not been published before on another website. Also, not having enough photos on a profile does not make an image eligible for deletion. Also, a photo not having metadata doesn't mean it qualifies for deletion, an example would be this picture on Commons [1], also of Ivy Queen. Please make sure you investigate properly so you are not wasting anyone's time. Thank you. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 04:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ivy_Queen,_2010.jpg){kind=link}
Comment: If there are no other images of this photo on the internet, then I formally withdraw this DR request. No need to waste anyone's time any further. I will withdraw the DR notice on the photo. Thank You, --96.48.230.18 06:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete, as this image had already been posted in the same resolution to http://latinzine.msn.com/blogs/musica/blog_post.aspx?post=a77c96ff-f13e-4dfe-9902-b710aa49cfc0 on December 5, 2012, whereas the Flickr-user posted it to Flickr Jan 4, 2013. Likely Flickr-washing. --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)- Delete, per above. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I reverted my flickrpass as this appears to be a flickrwash from this site: http://latinzine.msn.com/blogs/musica/blog_post.aspx?post=a77c96ff-f13e-4dfe-9902-b710aa49cfc0 Good catch Turelio, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
2012_KatiaKelly.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2012_KatiaKelly.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The information of source, author about this image is unclear, only upload of Flickr user Morning ☼ (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
2012_KatiaKelly.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I doubt the flickr account owner is 'Kátia Kelly' with only one image on this flickr account. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Denniss (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
2012_KatiaKelly.jpg){kind=link}
According to Google search, the same image was already in 2010 on Porn Website fapdu.com. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- And that's not the only picture from this user. See File:Tight butt in thong.jpg and [2]. Delete all pictures of user and block him. Not that it'll do any good, but hey. --Conti|✉ 01:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete new unused image that adds nothing we don't already have in abundance. But I am not at all convinced by this search. What is being searched on is not at all clear. All the references are (directly or indirectly) to this image on the Commons bar one. That one is to a porn video by Holly Halston. A thumbnail of the image shows up on the search, but is not on the page referred to and is not of Halston. The 2010 date shows on the search page but in what way this relates to the image is not at all clear. We seem to be getting more of these pieces of detective work where a supposedly damning conclusion is backed by "evidence" that when you look at it is more like a puzzle. --Simonxag (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Are you referring to the nominator's evidence or mine? Either way, it is often a puzzle indeed, and it is almost always possible to create some convoluted explanation as to why the research proves nothing. In this case, though, I see no reasonable explanation, at least when it comes to my evidence. The picture was uploaded to some porn site, in higher quality and uncropped, years before it was uploaded here. And it was titled "#112 from LBH Grab Bag of Amateur Sexy Teens 6", clearly indicating a collection of unrelated, random pictures. The nominated picture is similar, and is titled "#25 from LBH Grab Bag of Amateur Sexy Teens 6", same random collection. So, yes, it's a puzzle, but put all pieces together we get a very clear result. Every single picture of this uploader has to go, unless he can prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the pictures are his. --Conti|✉ 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- I was referring to the nominator's evidence but check the fapdu version [3] of File:Tight butt in thong.jpg. It's watermarked on the right knee. The user uploaded 3 versions of this file; check out the 2nd upload in particular. How can the fapdu version be the source? You want to block a user on evidence like this? --Simonxag (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you look closely, you see that the image uploaded here cuts off precisely where the watermark starts in the other image. And the question remains how a random porn site can have uncropped images from seemingly private images uploaded here? These are nude images, and they were uploaded by some throwaway account, and it's at best highly dubious if they really are what they seem. Requiring stronger evidence or, in the absence of such evidence, deleting the images is the only right thing to do. --Conti|✉ 00:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Also note the user's talk page, he has uploaded numerous porn images that were deleted, some, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude girl spreading.jpg, were deleted as a copyright violation. --Conti|✉ 00:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- I was referring to the nominators second upload of that image which is not cropped above the knee. Also the better quality of these images (1st and 3rd upload) is 623 pixels wide, the fapdu version is only 559: ours is better quality, though all have clearly been taken from the same source (and ours cannot be the source for fapdu). --Simonxag (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- If both images come from a common source, and one image is in a collection of images randomly taken from the internet.. what conclusion is there to make? The user has uploaded copyright violations in the past. He has been blocked for uploading copyright violations. His pictures are, at best, dubious. And the most amusing thing is that, in a previous deletion request, you yourself voted to delete all of the uploaders pictures. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spread vagina.jpg. I'm confused about what made you change your mind in the meantime. --Conti|✉ 00:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh him,I did not realize this was the same person. My suspicions remain from that deletion debate on the basis of some very odd exif data, incredibly variable technical skill and clearly more than one woman being his willing-to-pose girlfriend. I don't think your evidence quite shows what you claimed it showed, but it certainly doesn't help to clear him. I have no idea what the nominator's evidence shows, if it shows anything. Other editors disagreed with me on the earlier debate, but I would still block him on my reasoning there. --Simonxag (talk) 01:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Martin H. Yann (talk) 11:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image Sreejith K (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- being used, or not, that's not the problem.--Coentor (talk) 09:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Coentor's: Copyvio Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 18:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep Personal image taken by the user with no indication that it's being misused anymore than any other unused image. There is no valid reason to delete here. If the flowers can be identified, then it could be useful. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Moe McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Nominated in error as image used in an article, thank you to close the request. kashmiri 20:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: accidental creation McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
SVG at File:PT star real version.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality McZusatz (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Thumbnail version of File:Georgetown Law Campus.JPG. Patrick, oѺ∞ 22:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: {{Duplicate}} McZusatz (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://blastr.com/2013/01/jrr-tolkiens-son-trashes.php Rondador (talk) 07:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Next time, you'd better use speedy deletion Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 12:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://elfinal-delahistoria.blogspot.com/2012/09/cine-trailer-el-hobbit-un-viaje.html and the film. Rondador (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a simple enough typography Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 11:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The relief is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 23:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 23:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. The same image was posted to acam-france.org in 2011. There is no proof of {{Self}}. Takabeg (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Ignacio 
(discusión) 00:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No use, the SVG existed several years before this PNG. Fry1989 eh? 01:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Biografie of user, out of scope of Commons and Wikimedia projects. Martin H. (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal picture of user, out of scope of Commons Martin H. (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 02:24, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unclear educational value -Pete F (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 03:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 03:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal pic, no educational value. -Pete F (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Armenia This architectural work of Artur Tarkhanyan and Sashur Kalashyan was established in 1967.
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 2.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 3.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 10.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 11.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 12.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 13.JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (19).JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (20).JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (21).JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (22).JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (23).JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (24).JPG
- File:Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute 1 (25).JPG
- File:Yerevan Genocide Memorial 02.jpg
- File:Flamme-tsitsernakapert.jpg
- File:Armenian Genocide Memorial at the Genocide Museum in Yerevan.jpg
- File:Erevan - Le mémorial du génocide 02.JPG
- File:Mur-tsitsernakapert.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Restored: now FOP in Armenia - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard&oldid=96202242--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Official high school seal. PD-1923 is claimed, but no evidence of actual publishing prior to 1923. GrapedApe (talk) 04:24, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Previously published music sheet. No evidence uploader is copyright owner GrapedApe (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official organization logo, without evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted logo. Not simple enough to be in PD. The official site clearly states: "© Colonial League of Interscholastic Sports, Inc." -- Meisam (talk) 09:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
The Colonial League is a registered non-profit organization. Please do not delete.-- FreddyDVO (talk) 07:32, 11 January 2013 (EST)
- The organization's non-profit status is wholly irrelevant to the copyright status of its intellectual property.--GrapedApe (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- The Colonial League President expressed he is okay with having the logo displayed on the page.-- FreddyDVO (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2013 (EST)
- Does he know that such an action would irrevocably release the league's rights to this logo, and it could then be used by anyone at any time, even for commercial benefit? If so, please direct him to Commons:OTRS and have him email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to permanently record that release of rights.....or, you can chill out and !vote to delete, because the logo is already uploaded at File:Colonial League logo.png with a Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. --GrapedApe (talk) 02:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- The Colonial League President expressed he is okay with having the logo displayed on the page.-- FreddyDVO (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2013 (EST)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official organization logo, without evidence of permission. Seriously, the author is listed as "unknown" GrapedApe (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Too complicated for Pd-text. It's a coat of arms GrapedApe (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Song may be old, but this arrangement is sheet music very recent. No information on its first publication, which is necessary to determine its copyright status.GrapedApe (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It says "Arranged by Evan Sultanik" - that's the original uploader and en-wiki en:User:SyntaxPC - I've copied the full data from the original en-wiki page to the talk page. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
No justification provided for claim of PD-ineligibile GrapedApe (talk) 04:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official club logo, without permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official school logo, without evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of PD status GrapedApe (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photo of plaque, a derivative work GrapedApe (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official school logo, without evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official school logo, without evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official university logo, no evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama is USA. Derivative work. Copyright Eric Berg, 2002.--GrapedApe (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in USA. Derivative work. Running Free statue is copyright famous Philadelphia sculptor Henry Mitchell, page 34 --GrapedApe (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- At the time this was taken it was impossible to get a photo of the DAC without the statue. However the campus has undergone changes and the outside of the DAC has been overhauled (including moving the statue). There's no reason to keep this when a newer, better image can be taken. Delete --ImGz (talk) 15:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official college seal, no evidence of release or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official college logo, no evidence of release or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Previously published, no evidence of permission. Clearly lifted from interwebs GrapedApe (talk) 04:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [4] #15), no evidence that uploader = rights holder HaeB (talk) 04:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official college seal, no evidence of release or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 04:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official college logo, no evidence of release or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 04:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official rugby logo, no evidence of permission or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 04:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [5]), no evidence that uploader=rights holder HaeB (talk) 04:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [6]), no evidence that uploader = rights holder HaeB (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photo of artwork. No freedom of panorama in USA GrapedApe (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- This is the school [logo] installed outdoors at the entrance to the College. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alleghetor (talk • contribs) 10:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, and it's a Derivative work.--GrapedApe (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Published elsewhere on the web (e.g.[7]), no evidence that uploader = rights holder HaeB (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Image is clearly taken from the internet, without evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused vanity photo. Had been used on en.wiki, but the article was deleted as "Blatant advertising" GrapedApe (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photographs of official university class ring, which is artwork, so the photo is a derivative work. No evidence that the ring and ring design are PD. (See Commons:Deletion requests/Class rings) GrapedApe (talk) 05:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo GrapedApe (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Official university logo, no evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Not PD in the US, URAA extended the copyright. Although painted around 1919, it was not publicly displayed until after the 1940s (see this). Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
poorer 3D perspective and less analogous positioning of the two structures compared to File:CubaneToCun.png DMacks (talk) 05:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete There is also File:Cuban zu Cunean.svg. --Leyo 08:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted, no evidence of permission. Downloaded from Swedish Riksdag web site, where photos are copyighted: http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Start/Om-webbplatsen/Bilder/ "För icke-kommersiellt bruk" means "For non-commercial use", but there is no evidence even that's permitted. Sjö (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
The original image Image:Golpiza2.png was deleted back in 2008 as "no source" but there is no evidence that this image was released into the public domain -- being released to the public is not the same as being released into public domain. russavia (talk) 06:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Previosly published elsewhere on the web (e.g.[8]), no evidence that uploader = rights holder HaeB (talk) 07:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Armenia. Matenadaran was established on March 3, 1959. According to en:List of statues in Yerevan, the statue of Mesrop Mashtots was built by Ghukas Chubaryan in 1967.
- File:Mesrop.JPG
- File:Frik01.jpg
- File:Armenia Matenadaran.jpg
- File:Manuscriparmani.jpg
- File:Mashtots and korjun.jpg
- File:Mastoc.jpg
- File:Matenadaran entrance.jpg
- File:Matenadaran entrance1.jpg
- File:Matenadaran façade.jpg
- File:Matenadaran library.jpg
- File:Matenadaran-eagle.jpg
- File:Matenadaranat night.jpg
- File:Mesrob Mashdots 1923.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
This logo is beyond the threshold of originality. Copyvio. Lymantria (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
The used license does not seem to be valid for this photograph. Lymantria (talk) 08:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photo of the person who died circa 1960s. No source, unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photo of the person who died circa 1960s. No source, no description, unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photo of the person who died circa 1960s. No source, unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 09:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Simply a copy of File:SIT college.jpg with just captions added onto the image. Lovy Singhal (talk) 09:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Low quality (see file page), better alternative in Category:Pinacol coupling, not used anywhere. Leyo 11:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 11:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright (date + author/official photo = ?) + license issues (software screenshot = ?). Historical photos (here a mayor elected in 1947 and living from 1919 - 1993, taken from saobernardo.sp.gov.br, "© Copyright 2011 - Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo", or archive) may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 12:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Image involving deleted image. Takabeg (talk) 12:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 15:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Image involving deleted image. Takabeg. Takabeg (talk) 12:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Image involving deleted image. Takabeg. Takabeg (talk) 13:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of the Jesus picture. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per Google-Search, same image in identical resolution posted earlier to www.perfectphallus.com which also claims "© 2006 - 2011 PerfectPhallus.com. All rights reserved". In addition, the uploaded image carries a watermark in the lower right corner. Overall, unlikely own work and unlikely under a free license.-- Túrelio (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Similar uploads (both watermarked) from same user: File:Male Human Buttock.jpg (also low technical quality) and File:Erection Human Penis Facing Left (With Enchantment).jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
authors request/error Ivar (talk) 14:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [9]), no evidence that uploader = rights holder HaeB (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete but speedy copyvio to me. --Herby talk thyme 15:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
photographs don't fall under {{PD-GermanGov}} Liliana-60 (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images Sreejith K (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images Sreejith K (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images Sreejith K (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images Sreejith K (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images Sreejith K (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
It has only one page, a picture and can be re-uploaded as picture file. Sreejith K (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 15:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Uploader removed the source and author fields, so I am guessing its not his own work. Sreejith K (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work. Tarawneh (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
The original uploader is a copyvioler (it:Wikipedia:Utenti problematici/Lor92). Almost every file he uploaded on it.wiki is a copyviol. On may 2007 he uploaded File:Calaiò.JPG (copyviol) and on june 2007 he uploaded File:Emanuelecalaiò.JPG (copyviol). On september 2007 he uploaded this image, and I suppose it's a copyviol too: no EXIF or other metadata, small size and low quality of the picture. --Delfort (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination. Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lavezziinallenamento.JPG suggest that the uploader it:User:Lor92 is not trustworthy. --Martin H. (talk) 00:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Image from this site : under license cc but nc Mel22 (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Test document Sreejith K (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
I would like remove my own file Kunstdocent (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 17:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 17:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Photographer is not the uploader, so it is not "own work". Source is not a free licensed one. See watermark. Yanguas (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
the uploader said picture from Baidu.com, Which means no free-copyright 140.254.236.101 18:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Clearly incorrect geometries all over the place. The aromatic ring would have to be flat (along with all the H attached to it). Some other C-H have impossibly-long and/or badly-angled bonds. DMacks (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. In addition, {{BadJPG}}. --Leyo 11:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 18:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 19:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, to get into the cas, photography is not in any article, but not okay to be deleted for that reason, if we start to have a look around Commons, there are many pictures of kittens, animals, plants not being used in an article, the explanation of the "Personal Photo Gallery" was never my intention to look like a gallery "Flickr" or something similar if just put my images I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, I was wrong I should have written title "My gallery on Commons" no "My little gallery", but these things happen, if I made a mistake with the title apologize and remember there are millions, a lot of pictures of kittens in Commons, and still have not been eliminated , have a nice day Carliitaeliza (talk) 23:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Personal image taken by the user with no indication that it's being misused anymore than any other unused image. There is no valid reason to delete here. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Hundreds of thousands of cat pictures exist on commons - as long as they're useful for an educational purrrpose, as this one is (could be used as a subject for an art lesson or as a drawing model) it can be kept. Not a valid reason to delete, looks like a bad faith nom judging by nominators interactions with the uploader. BarkingFish (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE due to low (technical) image quality, overexposed and somewhat blurry. (Personal disclaimer: I like cats and think we still don't have enough good cat images.) -- Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- delete, sub-average quality --Isderion (talk) 23:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, orphan poor quality photo with no indication of compensating importance; Commons has sever hundred photos of tabbys of better quality. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi,is not a "private image collection" I had to put "My little gallery on Commons" no "My little Gallery" of title.The problem is that I had an item with all the photographs that I took on my user page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Carliitaeliza The idea was never "have a personal gallery" or "ring at gallery or personal photo album" just wanted to have the selection of photos I've uploaded to Commons,about whether the image is on education or not, is an image of an animal that is educational, like other pictures Carliitaeliza (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I think that this image is okay, is own work, so doesn't have license or things like that, so I think that shouldn't be deleted. --AleeDear (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Carliitaeliza. The image is realistically useful for an educational purpose - if I wanted to teach someone how to draw a kitten's face, close up, with detail, that image would be purrrfect - I could use it to teach someone, thus it has an educational use. We have a whole lot of cat and kitten pictures. Why this one? BarkingFish (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Of all the stoooopid cat images (with or without penises) on Commons, why is this one singled out for deletion as not realistically useful for an educational purpose? An obvious keep. --Mareklug talk 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason to delete. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It's an own work, and it could be usefulf.--Paparazzzi (talk) 20:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I left a better explanation on discussion of the others pics and is not a "private gallery collection" Carliitaeliza (talk) 11:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Personal image taken by the user with no indication that it's being misused anymore than any other unused image. There is no valid reason to delete here. If the mountain range in the background or the surrounding area is identified more clearly, then the image could be useful. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep A perfectly usable image of a landscape, not being misused anywhere, and image is educationally useful - agree with Moe that a bit more info on where this was shot and what the mountains were would make this much better. BarkingFish (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of focus. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Personal image taken by the user with no indication that it's being misused anymore than any other unused image. There is no valid reason to delete here. If the flowers can be identified, then it could be useful, despite it not being a particular good photo. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep What Moe said :D BarkingFish (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- But if you see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Aine_Takarai_Hiragana_Hangul.jpg it's a user of other Wikipedia,she/he have a photo,penned his name on the pic Description : Aine Takarai written in Hiragana and Hangul and it's not educational too,well Sorry did not have time to give a better answer above Carliitaeliza (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Personal userspace images are allowed to be kept as long as they are being used and there isn't an overabundance of them. This one image the user is keeping for their userpage for decoration isn't any more terrible than any other userspace image. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep again, per Moe Epsilon, I agree with everything they said. It's like they read my mind :) BarkingFish (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Personal image taken by the user with no indication that it's being misused anymore than any other unused image. There is no valid reason to delete here. If the street or area can be identified, then it could be useful in the future. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 21:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep What Moe said :) ^^ BarkingFish (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - private image collection; in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful kashmiri 19:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is not a a collection of images, the gallery was to have my contributions :),thanks! Carliitaeliza (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Nominated in error as image used in an article, thank you to close the request. kashmiri 20:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused blurry personal image INeverCry 19:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - simple text/table - only link is to sandbox that uploader hasn't edited in over a year INeverCry 19:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 19:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation.Rapsar (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- ??? --Denniss (talk) 10:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- My mistake, sorry.--Rapsar (talk) 10:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
i do not want it. Peter Boluwatife Adeleye (talk) 22:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
i do not want it. Peter Boluwatife Adeleye (talk) 22:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Implausible source/ author information and thus questionable licensing Uwe (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Implausible source/ author information and thus questionable licensing Uwe (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Implausible source/ author information and thus questionable licensing Uwe (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Clearly not "own work"; no source to determine copyright status. Эlcobbola talk 20:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --JuTa 22:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Identical to File:Georgetown Law Campus.JPG, including EXIF metadata, but with a less descriptive name. Patrick, oѺ∞ 22:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
There are already 2 superior images for this painting, and this file also has a non-free frame (photo by museum) -- moogsi(blah) 23:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Error loading file Wiszaf (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.182.144 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- That picture isn't even a panorama! --CherryX (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
This is entirely my work and we are applied this for copyright. After getting copyrighted, I shall re upload this... Johndominicphd (talk) 11:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: This is copyrighted already -- no application is necessary. I am deleting it because PDFs of images are not acceptable on Commons. Please do not upload any image in PDF form. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Frančišek Smerdu (1908-1964); per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 15:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Clearly lifted from the internet. No evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 04:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Updated rationale: User-created logo/collage is not appropriate for use in encyclopedia. Out of scope as "not realistically useful for an educational purpose" and does not "knowledge; instructional or informative."--GrapedApe (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Contrary to what GrapedApe asserts, it is not at all "Clearly lifted from the internet." In fact, when this image was uploaded in 2007, the creator, Ray Perfetti stated, "Please credit Ray Perfetti when using this image and send an e-mail to ray [at] rperfetti.com to indentify where you have used it. Thank you for your cooperation." I have done a google search and not seen this image used anywhere else but wikipedia. Evrik (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Evrik is correct, I am the creator of all three photographs and the Photoshop composition. -Ray Perfetti
- I just realized that I was not logged in when I made the last comment. I am confirmed with my user name raypp2. -Ray Perfetti
Deleted: While Perfetti may have created it, it is still out of scope as personal art work, not created by or authorized by the school. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Photo of artwork. No freedom of panorama in USA GrapedApe (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- The only real artwork here is the fence or gate itself, which appears to go back to to the building of the NRHP property itself 1890. The school has occupied the building since 1896. The seal or logo itself does not meet the threshold of originality IMHO - a couple of ovals with a basic type face, plus a rather standardized image of a middle-eastern oil lamp. The style of the seal is as old as the fence, and notice that there is no copyright notice. So if this was posted before 1978 (which is extremely likely) there is no copyright. I'm not sure that trade mark restrictions apply at Commons, but that should be the only restriction here.
- As an aside, see en:File:BaldwinFrontGate.jpeg a very similar photo uploaded by a Baldwin School SPE under a non-free rational. It appear that the "rights holders" want to distribute this image. Smallbones (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- If the school actually uploaded a similar photo with a fair use rationale, that indicates that they believe that they have IP rights over the work and that they wish to protect their IP. Therefore this copyright infringement should be deleted.-_GrapedApe (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- I checked out Commons:Trademarks and I think that applies, i.e. it's clearly allowed. I don't think copyright - for something that appears to have been publicly displayed for 100 years (plus or minus) applies at all. Smallbones (talk) 14:54, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per smallbones. Evrik (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Gerhard kemme (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: We are noit told who the painter of this owrk is, but 1910 is not early enough to assume that he died before 1943. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
archivo incompleto Uaehsanidadacuicola (talk) 14:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
uploaders request - photo of unknown road in unknown location (see image duscusion in Panoramio) Sreejith K (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Translation of Panoramio discussion:
- kikos64, on October 6, said:
- Šī fotogrāfija noteikti nav pareizi novietota - ceļš P29 šajā posmā ir ar grants segumu.
- This photo definitely is not in right place - road P29 there is with gravel pavement.
- Ivars Indāns, on October 7, said:
- Paldies. Varētu būt, laikam mana pirmā fočene panoramio :) Bet nav vairs citu ideju :(
- Thank You! May be, it is possibly my first photo in panoramio :) No more ideas :(
- Translations from Latvian added. --Kikos (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- 2nd possibility - rename to "Road somewhere in Latvian countryside". --Kikos (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Translations from Latvian added. --Kikos (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Nondescript road . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
The PD-CIA licensing is probably wrong, because the ground map doesn't look like a CIA map. Unless a link is provided to prove this, the map is a copyright infringement. Eleassar (t/p) 16:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This map can be found at http://www.loc.gov/item/2010588135 , in the Library of Congress (with a poorer scan), and, according to LOC metadata, creator is "United States. Central Intelligence Agency. Office of Russian and European Analysis.". Is this link the one you asked? Btw., it isn't like CIA factbook simple maps, but it seems that factbook isn't the only book published by CIA. Please also noticed that the source book and authorship is correctly stated in this image file description page - I would say it's surprisingly well referenced for an image uploaded in 2006.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hm, the superimposed map surely is work by the CIA, but what about the ground one? It seems more like work by local state agencies. The cited page doesn't convince me. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK, then please find the original map, and ask map producer if they allowed the CIA to use their map, or suggest them to sue CIA for copyright infringement. I've read a lot of conspiracy theories about CIA infringing basic human rights, but this is the first time I read a conspiracy theory about CIA infringing copyright.
- Why do you think it isn't from CIA? Do you think CIA is not powerful enough to make or purchase a reasonably accurate map of Slovenia?--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't want to imply that the CIA infringed the copyrights, it just seems much more probable to me that they purchased a map, as you say. This doesn't make it free for any usage though. Perhaps in the United States, but not in Commons, where we also consider the copyrights in the source country. Of course, it's just my opinion for now. However, it seems inconsistent to me that all the geographic features in the ground map are locally named, whereas some names are written in different font and in English. Also, for example, if you look well, the name of Ljubljana or Maribor is written twice (one name above the other), which doesn't really make sense. If they created the map, they could have also fixed this. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hm, the superimposed map surely is work by the CIA, but what about the ground one? It seems more like work by local state agencies. The cited page doesn't convince me. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Even if they purchased it, they had to sign a contract where they're given rights to do anything they want with this map (royality free). So Keep. --Miha (talk) 12:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Even if they purchased it, they had to sign a contract where they're given rights to do anything they want with this map (royality free). So
- So per your opinion, as they were given such rights, the map is now in the public domain. What's the legal link? Per {{PD-USGov-CIA}}, an image is in the public domain, because it is "a work of a Central Intelligence Agency employee, taken or made during the course of the person's official duties." It is most probable that this was not such a case here. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- They were given the unlimited rights on the map. They released it and anything they release is PD-CIA. --Miha (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- A source for this statement? --Eleassar (t/p) 20:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: I am prepared to believe the LOC's declaration that this is CIA work. I am not convinced by Elesaar's comments. It is very usual for US maps to have important place names in both the local language and English, while place names that do not have a well-known English equivalent are in only one language.. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment One thing is for sure: the ground map is not from the US. Look at the Exonym of de:Klagenfurt - it shows the slovenian sl:Celovec. Thus the map most probable comes from Slovenia. The CIA probably used it to overlay it with another (own) map. The problem is with the metadata from LOC, that they do not attribute the source of the ground map. {{PD-USGov-CIA}} covers works 'produced (and not just released) by CIA employee's. --Alexrk2 (talk) 16:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisardojm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: registered trademark INeverCry 17:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think that's a copyvio from here, the image and size of the file are the same. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- The image seems to be too simple to be copyrighted. See File:Umbro.svg as well. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but File:Umbro.png has a R from registered trademark, and if exists File:Umbro.svg nobody needs a suspicious file in Commons, don't think? Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 19:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- The image seems to be too simple to be copyrighted. See File:Umbro.svg as well. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Policy is to ignore trademarks -- we are concerned only with copyright. While this image cannot be used in a way that infringes on the trademark, any of the WPs could perfectly well use it to illustrate an article. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:49, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Liangent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of http://www.aicai.com/ , no proof that the uploader holds copyright. INeverCry 17:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wylve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo INeverCry 17:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
supersensed by File:Arendal Byfjorden.jpg -Sjokolade (talk) 19:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
I question the accuracy of the license. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 19:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Authors themselves have uploaded a better version to en.wiki for us in ABC article (will find its way to commons once they correct licence) Jebus989 (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
(edit: Now uploaded to commons as File:Approximate_Bayesian_computation_conceptual_overview.svg) Jebus989 (talk) 12:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Es wurde eine neue bessere Beleuchtung im Artikel Episkop vorgestellt. Ohne Nachweis, ohne Hinweis auf eine Realisierung. Das Bild sollte die Basis für eine Diskussion sein. Die Angabe wurde per Mail zurückgenommen. Der Strahlengang ist falsch und wird nicht mehr benötigt. Bomas13 (talk) 21:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused diagram claimed by the author to be inaccurate --moogsi(blah) 01:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, promotional
- File:KRIZTAL.jpg
- File:JC JOY DJING.jpg
- File:JC JOY DIJING.jpg
- File:JC JOY 5.jpg
- File:JC JOY PLAYING.jpg
- File:JC JOY 4.jpg
- File:JC JOY Djing.jpg
- File:JC JOY 3.jpg
- File:JC JOY PLAY.jpg
- File:JC JOY STUDIO.jpg
- File:Jc joy rmx.jpg
- File:Jc joy ecleptic rmx mp4 0001.jpg
- File:JC JOY -1.jpg
- File:HOGAR.jpg
- File:Jc joy.jpg
- File:JC JOY.jpg
- File:JC JOY BANNER.jpg
- File:Jc joy sagsa play 2.JPG
- File:Jc joy sagsa play.JPG
- File:JC JOY- DJ NEMO.JPG
- File:JC JOY PANDORA.jpg
- File:JC JOY KRIZTAL CLUB.jpg
- File:JC JOY Djing.JPG
SamuelFreli (talk) 00:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyvio, see user's talkpage and the other uploads with the same problem
Elisardojm (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heinkel he 114 san diego air and space museum 4.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep --ze-dan (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Morning ☼ (talk) 05:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: images not free in source country Denniss (talk) 07:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Santa Claus in Germany
[edit]Derivative work of copyrighted christmas decoration. Not permanently fixed at this location, thus not eligible for FOP. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Weihnachtsmann - Fassadenkletterer.jpg
- File:DEU Fleischer-Innung Braunschweig Weihnachtsmann 239 MSZ111130.jpg
- File:Figur eines Weihnachtsmannes.JPG
- File:Iserlohn-Weihnachtsmarkt1-Asio.JPG
- File:Rentier und Santa Claus.JPG
- File:Santa Claus sitting on a bench.jpg
- File:Schaukelnder Weihnachtsmann.JPG
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The pics are made on a Christmas market. In Germany this is FOP --217.246.205.130 19:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, it is not, as those are not permanently fixed at this location. They are moved there for a few weeks every year and are then removed again. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- So, we have deleted all pics in Category:Automobiles. They are stannding only some hours on his places. --217.246.219.161 04:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Cars are utilitarian objects and thus usually not copyrightable (en:Copyright#Useful_articles). However, they might be (and probably are) protected by en:Industrial design rights. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- So, we have deleted all pics in Category:Automobiles. They are stannding only some hours on his places. --217.246.219.161 04:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, it is not, as those are not permanently fixed at this location. They are moved there for a few weeks every year and are then removed again. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bogdan.tudorache (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional image, out of scope
- File:Pozaadunare6.JPG
- File:Pozaadunare4.JPG
- File:Pozaadunare3.JPG
- File:Pozaadunare2.JPG
- File:Pozaadunare1.JPG
- File:Pozaadunare.JPG
- File:LogoNewAve.jpg
Morning ☼ (talk) 10:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I do not see how these are promotional, but they lack detailed descriptions or categories; I can't see how they fit Commons' educational mission. The last one might be a copyright violation as well. -Pete F (talk) 17:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, used in declined AFD AFC
Morning ☼ (talk) 10:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No clear educational value; portraits of person of unknown significance/notability re: Wikimedia projects. -Pete F (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Two unused images of a woman which were formerly attached to a declined submission which "read like an advertisement". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shubi_Husain and an image of a man from a different camera, also unused. User's other upload was trimmed from a newspaper and speedied. Nomination is for COM:SCOPE but with the caution of COM:PRP due to the promotional/self-promotional nature of the uploads.
- File:Shubi Husain 10 05 2015 351 005 018.jpg
- File:Shubi Husain 10 05 2015 351 005 017.jpg
- File:Shubi.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment It would appear that at least one of these images may have been reuploaded after prior DN. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all, including Shubi, as out od scope. The request for creating an article was declined 5 times, this must come to end once. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
These derivative works have insufficient information about their copyright status. It could be that the photographs are old enough to be PD, but I can't read the captions myself
- File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 73.jpg
- File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 74.jpg
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (11).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (13).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (14).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (18).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (19).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (20).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (21).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (23).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- All of these images were taken before May of 1945. Therefore they are legitimate. You can also substitute it with the tag { {PD-Japan-oldphoto} } instead if that is more appropriate. Gryffindor (talk) 12:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: While they were obviously taken before May, 1945, we have no information on when they were first published. It is the publication date that controls copyright, not creation. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Honmaru Palace (Nagoya Castle)
[edit]I think these museum notices hold too much information to be free from copyright restrictions
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (24).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (25).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (29).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (30).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (32).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (33).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (37).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (38).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (40).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (41).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (46).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (52).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (59).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (64).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (65).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (71).JPG
- File:Nagoya Castle Honmaru Goten (76).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 10:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- They are just simple descriptions, why should they be copyrighted? We have tons of images here on the Commons that have all sorts of text in them that go beyond to these pictures here. Gryffindor (talk) 12:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I can tell (I can't read kanji), these all seem to be straightforward expressions of factual information -- certainly the maps, and probably the descriptions. I am not sure whether these fit within Commons' scope, but I see no copyright issues. -Pete F (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Because we deal mostly with images, we tend to forget that text was the first subject of copyright. All text beyond a very few words has a copyright -- even factual descriptions. I don't read kanji, but these are clearly well beyond the few words necessary for a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - 2 unused personal images and 3 promotional images - also possible copyvios for the logos and packaging
- File:Mu pic.jpg
- File:Ana wel.jpg
- File:انا معمارى لوجو الصفحة.jpg
- File:Magazen copy.jpg
- File:بوستر المجلة.jpg
INeverCry 18:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bandalapaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:41, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
- File:Devils-65-02.jpg
- File:Flaming-11-03.jpg
- File:Devils-65-01.jpg
- File:RockBeats-64-01.jpg
- File:Flaming-66-02.jpg
- File:Flaming-63-01.jpg
- File:Flaming-11-02.jpg
- File:Flaming-11-01.jpg
- File:Flaming-66-01.jpg
INeverCry 19:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iliyan1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 19:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iliyan1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro glezmen (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 19:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Filmspace11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - single uploads of user
INeverCry 19:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
- File:Gorka Urbizu Ahotsenea.jpg
- File:Gorka Urbizu diskak sinatzen.jpg
- File:Lisabö Plateruena.jpg
- File:Berri Txarrak Ahotsenea 2011.jpg
- File:Bidehuts Durangoko Azoka 2011.jpg
- File:Rafa Rueda Ahotsenea 2011.jpg
- File:Rafa Rueda Durangoko azoka 2011.jpg
- File:Zerdiok irudia.jpg
INeverCry 19:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Contemporanean (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos
- File:Logo bajo Logo CONTEMPORANEAN Art Curation Projects.jpg
- File:Logo CONTEMPORANEAN Art Curation Projects.jpg
INeverCry 19:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mesquita155 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 20:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by T.skirovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - no educational value
- File:Mv008.jpg
- File:Mv007.jpg
- File:Mv006.jpg
- File:Mv004.jpg
- File:Mv003.jpg
- File:Mv002.jpg
- File:Mv001.jpg
INeverCry 20:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
kuso, not self shizhao (talk) 06:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
The file might be used in violation of copyright. InstantNull (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Tower is copyrighted, no FOP in France. Eusebius (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Coyau (talk) 13:45, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Copyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Even without the source, the rationale for the previous deletion still holds. --Eusebius (talk) 22:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
This may be a private photo that has not previously been published. We hope (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- item description "Photo originates from the estate of David Carradine." We hope (talk) 03:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Many sites like this one used it, and similar photos of him, his wife and son. You also forgot some of the auction info, "Accompanied by an original color press kit folder for Enter the Dragon." This is standard publicity style promo. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 03:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- The description indicates only the photo is from the Carradine estate. We hope (talk) 04:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, it doesn't. It was irrelevant to the image description it seemed, so I left it out. But I just added the press kit info. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, assuming Wikiwatcher's info is correct. This looks like a press kit photo to me, explanation seems convincing. -Pete F (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrights Streambsm (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
A few of the uploader's files have been deleted. A few more are in question. DR may be the easiest way to sort which are legit. Note the camera model does match in many of the EXIF, so those may be legit.
- File:Historia WKPb. Krotki kurs..jpg
- File:Muzeum Tradycji Niepodleglosciowych w Lodzi tablica erekcyjna z 1960.JPG
- File:Mozaika w wilii Teschemachera przy ul. S. Wigury w Łodzi.jpg
- File:Nekrolog Samuela Abbe, Lodz Poland.tif
- File:Lodz - Radogoszcz - Robotnicy fabryki Samuela Abbego.jpg
- File:Lodz - jewish cementary.JPG
- File:Salviati signature in palace of Carl Scheibler in Lodz-Poland.2.JPG
- File:Salviati signature in palace of Carl Scheibler in Lodz-Poland.1.JPG
- File:Mauzoleum I.K. Poznanskiego w Lodzi mozaika w kopule grobowca.JPG
- File:Slub Bronislawy Rotsztat i Jozefa Srebrnogory.jpg
- File:Lodz d. oboz cyganski 1941-1942 Wojska Polskiego 82 widok ogolny (1).JPG
- File:Lodz mozaika Salviateego w palacu K. Scheiblera.2.jpg
- File:Lodz mozaika Salviateego w palacu K. Scheiblera.1.jpg
- File:Dzierżązna, filia obozu przy ul. Przemysłowej w Łodzi, plan z 1943..JPG
- File:KL Dachau - plan obozu.jpg
- File:Walter Genewein.jpg
- File:Łódź-Radogoszcz, były obóz przejściowy w fabryce Michała Glazera, stan z 1946 r. foto 3.jpg
- File:Łódź-Radogoszcz, były obóz przejściowy w fabryce Michała Glazera, stan z 1946 r. foto 2.jpg
- File:Łódź-Radogoszcz, były obóz przejściowy w fabryce Michała Glazera, stan z 1946 r. foto 1.jpg
- File:Radogoszcz (obóz przejściowy) plan obozu.jpg
- File:Łódź, kamień pamiątkowy na terenie ogródków działkowych przy ul. Źrodłowej (4).JPG
- File:Łódź, kamień pamiątkowy na terenie ogródków działkowych przy ul. Źrodłowej (5).JPG
- File:Łódź, kamień pamiątkowy na terenie ogródków działkowych przy ul. Źrodłowej (1).JPG
- File:Łódź, kamień pamiątkowy na terenie ogródków działkowych przy ul. Źrodłowej (3).JPG
- File:Łódź, kamień pamiątkowy na terenie ogródków działkowych przy ul. Źrodłowej (2).JPG
- File:Rad winietka firmowa Muzeum Tradycji Niepodległosciowych w Lodzi, 2012 r..jpg
- File:Rad winietka firmowa MHRR w Lodzi z 1989 r..jpg
- File:Titanic 100-lecie zatonięcia "Noc z Titanikiem" w Łodzi pocztowka.jpg
- File:Gdansk Neptun bez listka VI 2008.jpg
- File:Dzierzynowo - dwor.jpg
- File:Rad F-ka Abbego winietka rachunku.jpg
- File:Getto Bajgelman Dawid Dziennik Lodzki.4 II 1945.nr 4.s.4..jpg
- File:Rotstat Bronislawa nekrolog.2.jpg
- File:Rotstat Bronislawa nekrolog.1.jpg
- File:Tomaszewicz Wincnenty. prof. zdj. portretowe z ok. 1960 r..jpg
- File:Tomaszewicz Wincenty, Ze wspomnień lekarza. Warszawa 1965, ss. 529 (okladka).jpg
- File:Władysław Dzierżyński, willa.JPG
- File:Grob Wiery Dzierżynskiej-Fiałkowskiej.2.jpg
- File:Grób Wiery Dzierżyńskiej-Fiałkowskiej..jpg
- File:Grób Katii (Katarzyny) Dzierżyńskiej..jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_plan_obozu.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dzier%C5%BCy%C5%84skiej..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Canoe1967 (talk) 23:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Listed as copyright to Bettmann-Corbis Archive. We hope (talk) 03:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Typical copyfraud example. Corbis or Bettman didn't exist at that time, but adds this same boilerplate notice on all their images. Whether they own any rights is irrelevant. Of the 20 million images they have attached such copyright notices to, a search will show that they have only filed a few hundred actual copyrights. And those were for very recent photos they purchased from photographers of celebrities. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 03:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Typical press photos were rarely copyrighted, as you pointed out re: UPI. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per WikiWatcher. In order for Corbis-Bettman to own the copyright, it would have had to be transferred before it expired, and then renewed. As asserted above, renewal of copyright on this kind of photo is rare. If WikiWatcher searched for such renewals and did not find any, that is grounds for keeping the photo. -Pete F (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know that it impacts anything, but the photo here on Commons is actually a cropped version. The Corbis and AP pages linked above extend further left and right. -Pete F (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Transferring my copyvio mark into DR, contested via file history and file talk. Uploaded apparently by a webmaster of photographers website (pt:Gonçalo Lobo Pinheiro). Unclear copyright status as previously published "via (example) http://portaldoprofessor.mec.gov.br/fichaTecnicaAula.html?aula=21337 (2010) = http://www.zaroio.com.br/i/o/2008101405472410.jpg or grabbed from internet", including official facebook (2012). Permission from Gonçalo Lobo Pinheiro (if he owns the copyrights...) needed. Gunnex (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith (I have heard this when dealing with obvious trolls, but surely applies to any one?), and leave off the snark. «If he owns the copyrights», with ellipsis or not, is a not a good question: This photograph (and indeed most of those uploaded by User:Glp (talk · contribs)) is known to be taken by Gonçalo Lobo Pereira, and that can be confirmed in numerous sources (pro tip: not at zaroio.com.br). The question is wheather User:Glp (talk · contribs) is mandated by Gonçalo Lobo Pereira to release them in Commons. Lets wait for an OTRs. -- Tuválkin ✉ 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Apparently the uploader Glp (talk · contribs) is not able to obtain permission(s). Instead, he reuploaded files already deleted with missing permission. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gonçalo Lobo Pinheiro a trabalhar.jpg.Gunnex (talk) 09:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Giving his behaviour both in Commons and in Wp:pt, persisting on the same mistakes after being repeatedly explained what to do, and adding clueless snark to it (see this for example), I’m dropping this whole case as a matter of personal interest. This guy is the living proof that «assuming good faith» is a waste of time — and I do regret that I wasted some of mine categorizing the images he can/want not to prove he didn’t steal from the actual photographer. -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File is missing evidence of permission FASTILY (TALK) 00:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Transferring my copyvio mark into DR, contested via file history. Image shows photographer pt:Gonçalo Lobo Pinheiro at work, uploaded apparently by a webmaster of photographers website. Unclear copyright status as previously published via offical facebook (2012), presuming that Gonçalo Lobo Pinheiro couldn't take this picture of himself, so any kind of permission (whoever the real photographer was) is needed. See also User talk:Gunnex#GLP's purported copyvios. Gunnex (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I had brought up the matter previously at Commons:Village pump#Flagging a doubtful license. Of all the photos uploaded by User:Glp (talk · contribs) this was the one that caught my eye — the others must be replaced with hires/EXIF versions and subject to a proper OTRS alright, but I could not see how this could be said to be authored by the person it depicts (unlike his self portrait, still waiting to be undeleted by Gunnex). However User:Jmabel had me schooled by the village pump — and yes, photograpic authorship can be given to whoever gives «sufficient direction to be the effective author». I’m not sure who is the meanest mightiest expert in deals professional photographers in Commons, wheather Gunnex or Jmabel, and who is expected to be credited for this one image so that it is accepted as genuine, but I’m getting the popcorn.
- Meanwhile I strongly urge User:Glp (talk · contribs) to put an end to all this by signing an OTRS for each image (or having it signed by his boss) and uploading them in their original form by use of link that says «Upload a new version of this file».
- Presumably we can get a blanket OTRS from him for images uploaded from this account: no need to have a separate OTRS for each image. Also, as I previously remarked on the Village pump, it's not obvious that he wouldn't hold he copyright on this. He could have used a timer, or someone he employs could have taken it, or he could simply have given sufficient direction to be the effective author. The legal copyright holder of a photo is not necessarily the person who snaps the shutter. - Jmabel ! talk 01:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
While the photos do need an OTRS permit, they do not have to be uploaded in higer resolution. Nothing in Commons policy demands that. ---89.244.171.153 09:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Apparently the uploader Glp (talk · contribs) is not able to obtain permission(s). Instead, he reuploaded files already deleted with missing permission. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:NélsonÉvora@17m.jpg.Gunnex (talk) 09:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File is missing permission. Should be restored upon reciept of OTRS permission FASTILY (TALK) 00:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
