Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/09/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 29th, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image owned by Caracol Televisión. 190.25.100.166 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Open & shut - this sort of thing needs OTRS for it, and if they have it pending they can easily undelete it Tabercil (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The State Government of Delaware is not a part of the US Federal Government. LX (talk, contribs) 11:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim that this photo was taken by an employee of the US Federal Government seems unlikely and unsubstantiated. LX (talk, contribs) 11:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:37, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP for 3D modern art in the USA installed after 1978. Leoboudv (talk) 03:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a Getty Images photo. Derivative work of a copyrighted work, free license does not apply. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Indian boy penis.jpg Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This does not appear to be an Indian, a boy or a penis. Could you elaborate? -mattbuck (Talk) 01:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think he's referring to the part about it adding nothing to the existing body of similar works. I'm not against nudity, but this is (compared to our substantial body of work) a rather poor quality shot. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Yep, that's what I was meaning. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strange FlickR picture without EXIF-data and source (copyvio)? Check!
Low quality and nothing we donna have already? Check!
Ridiculous keep-vote from User Cirt, which emphasizes that this picture is to be deleted per COM:PORN? Check! --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: source suspect, quality mediocre at best Denniss (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is too high for the British threshold of originality (see COM:TOO#United Kingdom). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, suspiciously low-res, no EXIF, search with TinEye finds very similar images - one of them is on official Uzbekistan Embassy page. Rndomuser (talk) 01:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture collection, out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 06:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture collection, out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 06:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam ; no use Tangopaso (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 09:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also in higher resolution on Facebook, but I can't find any useful date. Google tells that the image also appears in a thread on Skyscrapercity but doesn't reveal the page number & the thread is over 300 pages. I checked all posts made after it was uploaded here and couldn't find the image. Possibly copyvio. No FOP in the Philippines, so should probably be deleted anyway. Stefan4 (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the Philippines. Low resolution and no EXIF. Lots of copyvios by this user according to his talk page, so the photo might have been stolen from somewhere. Stefan4 (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User requested deletion in own user space. StasKulchenko (talk) 10:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely out of scope, see also Paolo Piliero and en:Paolo Piliero. Trijnsteltalk 10:18, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, no educational content. GeorgHHtalk   12:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any value MPF (talk) 12:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional image being used only in spam page that has been deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 12:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Batería de Santiago en Portobelo información señalización.jpg.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Panama for text and maps. Not important to illustrate subject anyway. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:23, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark from Indonesian news agency Antara News visible. A bigger version with an alternative watermark can be seen under http://www.antaranews.com/foto/34195/kri-klewang NoCitNeed (talk) 15:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:23, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:23, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   16:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurred to be useful in any project, and replaceable by other images in "Category:Loxosceles reclusa". — Cheers, JackLee talk 16:39, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to have been cropped from here. Not clear that the uploader is the copyright holder. — Cheers, JackLee talk 17:08, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a sculpture by Evgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974. No Panorama Freedom in Russia. A.Savin 17:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the actual sundial depicted, in Belgium. See photograph. Note that even the displayed time matches. Powers (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from here, I think. Stefan4 (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a poster with copyrighted content. A.Savin 18:08, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can be found here. The page I linked to existed almost two years before this image was uploaded to Commons, which indicates that the file is likely not the uploader's work. Aamsse talk to me 18:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work claim is not credible: Metadata from the year 2000 for an event in 2006, previously published at elsewhere. Uploader has numerous other issues with uploads. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a scan from a printed source that is unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate upload. Sorry. Same as File:Governor Henry Lippitt House Museum in 2005.jpg Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal private picture, not usefull. Martin H. (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's property of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and it's not free-licensed. Wizardist (talk) 23:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is showing a recent building in France, a country where there is no freedom of panorama|. The architect of this building Ieoh Ming Pei is still alive. Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:39, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional INeverCry 01:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Promotional – logo for non-notable company. Senator2029 23:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused text logo - only upload of user INeverCry 01:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Senator2029 23:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - low quality professional shot - no EXIF INeverCry 01:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Google image search says INeverCry is onto something. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scope? copyright? INeverCry 04:39, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - low quality - homemade - unused text logo INeverCry 04:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure about the notability - please also see Sivalenka pavani prasad and the history of this file. Trijnsteltalk 10:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed speedy deletion request being moved to a normal deletion request, as it requires discussion in order to be deleted. Senator2029 11:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This file should be kept, as it is just simple numbers and letters. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain." (Template:PD-textlogo). Senator2029 11:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo Sven Manguard Wha? 20:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this image reviewed. Though I uploaded this file, I now have my doubts as to whether this should be interpreted as a possible breach of copyright related to the South Park flim. (talk) 11:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request, DW concerns Sven Manguard Wha? 20:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Earlier copies in smaller format: [1][2] Stefan4 (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probable copyvio, also too distorted to be used as the uploader is trying to use it, so out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Lautaro (de Pedro Subercaseaux).jpg, low quality ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 20:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate Wvk (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful file Marco 21:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 20:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've withdrawn a previous nomination of a previous version, I want to re nominate another version Jebulon (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don't delete process pages, especially ones that were active. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Sorry, no. The "debate" cannot be closed, because there was no debate, only an unilateral decision without any explanation, nor reference to a rule. Not a good behavior for an admin, IMO.

as I withdrawn the nom, the "process page" was no more active....--Jebulon (talk) 22:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

technical problem Lilian Lukka (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 23:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rrburke as duplicate and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Prince salman al saud1.jpg  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Technically since they're in different formats, it's a grey area deletion, but this is an easy one. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - low quality - no EXIF INeverCry 01:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio (uncropped version available on the internet) PierreSelim (talk) 06:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF INeverCry 04:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio (it's a promotional picture from Turkey) PierreSelim (talk) 06:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (Dutch newspaper Eindhovens Dagblad). Velocitas (talk) 00:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wrong placed Vlinder van Oranje (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont want it Perfect Achiever (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it was in wrong way Perfect Achiever (talk) 09:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 20:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont want it Perfect Achiever (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it was in wrong way Perfect Achiever (talk) 09:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 20:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images that were uploaded by User:Styorukoglu. The uploader claims all images are his/her {{Own work}}. But I think he/she took from them from other webcites. If the uploader cannot prove {{Own work}}. (I belive) we'd better delete all of them. Note: I didn't check most of them, because I was tired :)

Takabeg (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: almost (all) copyvios Denniss (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image taken from an internet forum, no indication of real author or date - the author name at present given in Russian is "lieutenant". INeverCry 18:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom - no evidence of permission Sven Manguard Wha? 20:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheNewKliq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios - low quality - no EXIF - also maybe out of scope promotional

INeverCry 01:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The photos definitely present a conflict of interest, and their presence on Commons is to purely to promote the otherwise-unknown group. A quick internet search for the name "TheNewKliq" produces sites Twitter & Facebook pages, sites selling t-shirts of the group, etc. Senator2029 23:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FuneralOfHope (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional -unused

INeverCry 04:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dare66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Listed files are art work by a living person, see en:Zoran Djurovic.

GeorgHHtalk   09:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BenTheElectionMan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web resolution photos with no EXIF data and unlikely authorship claims; most likely non-free Internet images like several of the other files uploaded by the same user.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all copyvios Denniss (talk) 14:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SENAComunica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebamakademie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only logo with questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kotor86king (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What new could be added to Category:Human penis?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vermell12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vermell12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably not own work. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong colored german navy rank insignia

[edit]

Wrong background color and low quality. SVG versions uploaded already and should replace the induvidual files after deletion via bot. I requsted single file deletion for every file, but this was denied because it wasn't a mass deletion request... I also spoke to the author of these files and he supports this deletion idea --Flor!an (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No. While in my closing comment I did suggest that a mass DR would have been better, I denied the previous request because, as a matter of policy, we do not delete png files after SVGs have been created. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Well, but they are simply wrong colored! I just tried to mention that SVG versions are existing anyways, so wiki is not "losing" images because they are "replaced". I know that "better image available" is not a valid deletion reason, but in this specific case I would strongly recommend, because of the color issue. --Flor!an (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Strong support i, as the creator, would like to support the deletion. the files have wrong color, not exact angels and ratios and last but not least this files are pixel-graphics. so please delete, no-one will miss them. --Dirk (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Changed my mind per this discussion. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FRen31k

[edit]

TV screenshots, not free.

Martin H. (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How shall we know that no author was ever stated. We only have one side of the postcard but not the backside were often some more info is found. En wiki version talkpage states the depicted church burned down late april 1941 so timeframe would match (unless a postwar church rebuild) Denniss (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Once they has globally been replaced by wikitables, they might be nominated for deletion." - Category:Images_which_should_use_wikitable 88.71.254.246 14:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque no está catalogado como BIC Alcorce (talk) 14:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No importa. Resulta igualmente útil, aunque no participe en el concurso. Platonides (talk) 11:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 20:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio for the image of the man INeverCry 01:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 21:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file was copied and updated with a new image as File:Mercian eagle.png. Drdpw (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 21:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF - low quality- uploader has already had many files like this deleted, see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by N-mar INeverCry 18:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 21:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF - low quality- uploader has already had many files like this deleted, see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by N-mar INeverCry 18:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 21:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is not the Coat of arms of Ñeembucú Aacc89 (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 21:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is wrong and thus misleading.

  1. There are two "Longitude ecliptica".
  2. The both angles and should be perpendicular, i.e. should be measured along the ecliptic (= Ecliptica). Torsch (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. INeverCry 05:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF - low quality- uploader has already had many files like this deleted, see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by N-mar INeverCry 18:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]