Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
No EXIF data, seems to be a professional work, presence on multiple sources (one of the many) hence doubtful authorship. —Bill william comptonTalk 03:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as a copyvio. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
No EXIF data, seems to be a professional work, presence on multiple sources (one of the many) hence doubtful authorship. —Bill william comptonTalk 03:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as a copyvio. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
No EXIF data, seems to be a professional work, presence on multiple sources, hence doubtful authorship. —Bill william comptonTalk 03:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as a copyvio. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
it's vandalism Shujenchang (talk) 04:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as nonsense/vandalism/etc. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
add spam link Shujenchang (talk) 07:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam - speedy, gone thanks Herby talk thyme 07:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
wrong description Luxil (talk) 11:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has been deleted. INeverCry 20:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
wrong description Luxil (talk) 11:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has been deleted. INeverCry 20:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation (http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/jyyZIJsebXC/Citta+di+Palermo+Pre+Season+Training+Camp/q8D3oS51IhG/Nicolas+Viola) Quatar (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
copyviol http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/dVn6voIlUrB/Citta+di+Palermo+v+Cagliari+Calcio+Serie/ELRZe-a9Jdm Quatar (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
copyviol ( http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Christian%20Maggio/Citta%20di%20Palermo%20v%20SSC%20Napoli%20Serie/CZah9xtp9LI) Quatar (talk) 15:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, http://www.seriebnews.com/calcio-mercato/2012/06/20/calciomercato-novara-altri-affari-in-vista-col-palermo-chiesto-milan-milanovic/ Quatar (talk) 15:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyviol. Please nuke all the contributions by this user. Source: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Mauro+Cetto/Juventus+FC+v+Citta+di+Palermo+Serie/n94ZItmYF24 Quatar (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
copyviol http://www.daylife.com/photo/05aSadq1bs87i?__site=daylife&q=Nicolas+Bertolo Quatar (talk) 16:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio per nom. INeverCry 20:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
copyvio: http://www.lanacion.com.ve/farandula-y-espectaculos/se-fue-joselo/ Laura Fiorucci (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --whym (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio per nom. INeverCry 20:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Very low quality. Subject is completely unidentifiable in the shot. TenPoundHammer (talk) 20:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 20:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Tiny useless duplicate of File:Flag of Azerbaijan.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 20:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo; educational value unclear. Hystrix (talk) 21:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploader has provided no proof of public domain status. A date and source of publication is necessary for this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete Insufficient information to prove that the file is in the public domain. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above. INeverCry 20:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused, not needed please delete soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulboost (talk • contribs)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
violate copyright Mkckim (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
- File:Where am i staring.jpg
- File:Only me.jpg
- File:Dmjc.jpg
- File:In black.jpg
- File:I love it everytime i smile.jpg
- File:The woman in black.jpg
- File:Me me.jpg
- File:Simple me.jpg
Érico Wouters msg 04:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. Per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Used in a sandbox on an English Wikipedia page where the user's only two edits were to create said sandbox. While Commons allows for a limited number of personal photos for users to use in their userspaces, it's not a vanity page repository. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- What happened there? There certainly wasn't a DR there when I set up this DR, but this says you beat me to it by two minutes... Sven Manguard Wha? 04:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not should have happened edit conflict,and by that not must have shown my edit...Érico Wouters msg 04:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
copyright violation ( http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/9CUpJMTUH7E/Citta+di+Palermo+Pre+Season+Training+Camp/HsYdGSKB3I8 ) Quatar (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Too low a resolution to be useful. In any case, this is a derivative work of a likely copyrighted emblem. I'm also adding File:Stjohnsdiocesanschool1.jpg to this nomination, which appears to be the same image, but with its resolution artificially increased, making it very poor quality. CT Cooper · talk 23:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 10:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikimedia Commons. World bus boy (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikimedia Commons. World bus boy (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed. World bus boy (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed. World bus boy (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This photo shouldn't be posted on Wikipedia Commons. Sorry about that. World bus boy (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
All of those images include copyrigthed images.
For example:
1. Image of Vartan is too modern and the uploader is not copyright hodler.
2. Image of Mimar Sinan is too modern and the uploader is not copyright holder.
3. The autoportrait of Martiros Saryan was drawn in 1942 and copyrighted. М. С. Сарьян.«Автопортрет с палитрой». 1942. Картинная галерея Армении. Ереван.
4. The portrait of Charles Aznavour was taken from the jacket of Desormais that was published in 1972 in France.
Takabeg (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Above or below the threshold of originality? Blurpeace 03:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal (most likely) photograph. —Bill william comptonTalk 03:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
No source or author (or description, but we all know what it is), and this upload dosen't fit in with the rest of the contributor's work. I think it best that we swap out the three legitimate uses (the fourth is a galley of arrows in a userspace page) with a different green arrow and get rid of this one. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artwork of Eran Algor Groskopf - no indication that uploader is artist or that the artist has released this under a free license Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Photography of a not free work Ludo (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
So far, 7 uploads by user: 6x copyvio (skyscrapercity, panoramio), 1x unidentifiable (probadly cropped) = COM:PRP: unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 06:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Cometí un error con el formato del nombre, debería ser VE-S-ayacucho.png Sparkve (talk) 08:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Cometí un error con el formato del nombre, debería ser VE-S-antonioromulocosta.png Sparkve (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Cometí un error con el formato del nombre, debería ser VE-S-andresbello.png Sparkve (talk) 08:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (original building made by an architect) Remi Mathis (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (original building made by an architect) Remi Mathis (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
It is dubious if the uploader really is the Serbian man who made the logo as claimed in the templates on this page. Made by a Serbian man who was honoured in New York. Thus, I take it that the source country is not Germany, despite the German text on the logo, so it is presumably too complex for Commons without OTRS. These sources are earlier: [1][2] Stefan4 (talk) 12:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Нет такого объединения. Троллинг 89.162.139.2 13:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Not own work. Wrong date. See: http://es.mortalkombat.wikia.com/wiki/Archivo:Cx11.png (previously published) McZusatz (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal art work -- out of scope. This user has uploaded many logos that are not actually in use. Commons is not Flickr or a site to show off one's graphic design skills.
Also:
- File:Logo-islamic-tourism-03-1+2.png
- File:Logo-07-13-3.png
- File:Logo-07-13-1.png
- File:Logo-07-12-grey-4.png
- File:Logo-07-12.png
- File:Logo-07-11.png
- File:Logo-07-10.png
- File:Logo-07-9.png
- File:Logo-07-8.png
- File:Logo-07-7.png
- File:Logo-07-6.png
- File:Logo-07-5.png
- File:Logo-07-4.png
- File:Logo-ITC.png
- File:Logo-ITC-5.svg
- File:Logo-ITC-05-14.png
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
not in good resolution Bbsejdini (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (the suspended balls may be considered as an original work which is not in the public domain + no FOP in France) 78.251.53.183 15:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Utilisé dans aucun article, suppression des données personnelles de la personne photographiée GeekPasca (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Sealle (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Sealle (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
mauvaises couleurs. Cafedelyon 17:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
mauvaises couleurs. Cafedelyon 17:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Source is listed as "Gemini Magazine". This seems to be a reference to http://www.gemini-magazine.com/ but the website does not appear to be "copyleft", in particular no reason to think its contents are PD-released. TheGrappler (talk) 18:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
The Sahara, Mirage, Paris and Harrah's chips contain non-free derivative works that are not de minimis. The photograph can perhaps be retained if the non-free elements are blurred out. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Per COM:DW. Probably this image is a drawing based on this photo (no mention in the OTRS ticket). It is not clear if the original photo is in the public domain or under a free license. Trixt (talk) 20:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Non-free on English Wikipedia [3], I think it's too simple but who knows. Fry1989 eh? 20:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
The current Malaysian arms is still under copyright. We can only have a freely made SVG of it on Commons. Fry1989 eh? 20:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal image repeatedly used for non-notable biography on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal image repeatedly used for non-notable biography on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure about this one, but I bet it's copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 20:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 20:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I think this might be the same image as the recently deleted File:EchoBayHighTide.PNG. Please check the history. Also check other recent uploads in Category:Premium Point Orlady (talk) 21:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
The uploader claims the subject of this portrait and his organization have approved this image to be used freely (本人および所属団体より使用許可取得済み。), but it's not verified through OTRS. Tomo suzuki (talk) 21:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
redundant, uploaded a different version, update does not work Gisling (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LX as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: False licensing claims. The uploader obviously is not the copyright holder. Forwarding to DR: is the embossing too creative for {{PD-textlogo}}? Blurpeace 03:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Embossing, custom character effects, 3D sides, light reflections... yeah. {{PD-textlogo}} is not a blanket permission to keep anything that contains something that can be interpreted as characters. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama in the US does not include artworks. Refer to COM:FOP for more. russavia (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- If this is the case, I concur with the deletion request. --Sushiflinger (talk) 14:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (no FOP in France) of original architect building Remi Mathis (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's true. I did not know copyvio details when I uploaded that picture. --Agamitsudo (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (original building made by an architect) Remi Mathis (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- As far as I know, if the law is not clear (as it is in this case, it is a precaution) you don't delete the file, you put a warning, because peeple can still use it for some purposes and in some countries. in any case, I never really though of this "Bibliothèque Marie Curie" as an "artwork" (or similar), for me it was just a building that required an higher resolution image of an already existing one here on commons.
- P.S. In any case, can I at least know the name of this "famous" architect? --Alexmar983 (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- The law is perfectly clear in France: "original" buildings (made by architects, unique and created especially for this purpose) are protected by the "droit d'auteur" (copyright) and there is no FoP in France. The architect of this building is Michel Rémon. Remi Mathis (talk) 13:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but in France. I can use in another country, right? So the most simple precaution is to put a warning that says "don't use it in/on X, Y, Z" in the cases "1","2"... for example if I am prof and I want to display this slide in a teaching presentation, i can still use it. it is the same principles of old photos, you say that you may have a problem in certain countries where the limit is 99 years instead of 75... but you don't remove them. Or logos of Univeristies which are use on some en.wiki pages but can't be used on others, if I remember correctly. In all these cases, you just leave a warning. If you really want to apply the rule "there is problem is some countries" >> "i remove directly from commons everywhere" it is fine for me but I woould prefer the system to be coherent.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Correct me if I'm wrong but I think that on Commons, you have to respect the copyright both in the US and in the country where the photograph was taken, don't you? [Otherwise, we would make no selection and this photograph would also be displayed on the French-speaking Wikipedia, saying "it's perfectly legal for Swiss people and it's not a French Wikipedia : fr is also for the Swiss"]. Remi Mathis (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but in France. I can use in another country, right? So the most simple precaution is to put a warning that says "don't use it in/on X, Y, Z" in the cases "1","2"... for example if I am prof and I want to display this slide in a teaching presentation, i can still use it. it is the same principles of old photos, you say that you may have a problem in certain countries where the limit is 99 years instead of 75... but you don't remove them. Or logos of Univeristies which are use on some en.wiki pages but can't be used on others, if I remember correctly. In all these cases, you just leave a warning. If you really want to apply the rule "there is problem is some countries" >> "i remove directly from commons everywhere" it is fine for me but I woould prefer the system to be coherent.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- The law is perfectly clear in France: "original" buildings (made by architects, unique and created especially for this purpose) are protected by the "droit d'auteur" (copyright) and there is no FoP in France. The architect of this building is Michel Rémon. Remi Mathis (talk) 13:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused, without description. IMHO out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- No need to keep, we can delete this one.--Khutuck (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
According to this source, it seems that tourist development planning began in the 1970s and things didn't really get going until the 1990s. It seems likely, therefore, that this building was designed and built in the 1970s or more recently. Given France's 70 years pma copyright term, this means the building is still a copyrighted work of architecture. Since there is no freedom of panorama in France, this is an unauthorized derivative of a copyrighted work, which must be deleted from Commons. cmadler (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Also File:Vendoire 24 Tourbière 2011.jpg. cmadler (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry : I didn't care at all, even if I ususally do. Before deleting, I'd like to ask for a short delay : I live a few kilometers from the site and I'll ask as soon as possible for an authorization. I guess I can find thenecessary form on wikipedia. Only two points : -1- if the two files concerning the house have to be deleted, there's a third one which must be deleted too : the wharf, which is a part of the house, i. e. File:Vendoire 24 Embarcadère 2011.jpg ; -2- I don't exactly kow how things are managed in such a case but if deletion is compulsory as soon as possible, do it, and I'll upload again the files when I get the authorization. -- Regards. --JLPC (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think deletion discussions normally run at least 7 days. If you get authorization after that, you can file an undeletion request, which is probably better than re-uploading. As for the third image, I personally think the wharf in and of itself is more an uncopyrightable utilitarian object than a copyrightable architectural work (or a meaningful part of the building as a whole). cmadler (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry : I didn't care at all, even if I ususally do. Before deleting, I'd like to ask for a short delay : I live a few kilometers from the site and I'll ask as soon as possible for an authorization. I guess I can find thenecessary form on wikipedia. Only two points : -1- if the two files concerning the house have to be deleted, there's a third one which must be deleted too : the wharf, which is a part of the house, i. e. File:Vendoire 24 Embarcadère 2011.jpg ; -2- I don't exactly kow how things are managed in such a case but if deletion is compulsory as soon as possible, do it, and I'll upload again the files when I get the authorization. -- Regards. --JLPC (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep Not enough originality to get a copyright. Beside File:Vendoire 24 Tourbière 2011.jpg is a general view where any architectural detail would be de minimis. Yann (talk) 05:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Not original enough to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This is not a true svg. It contains the bitmap of File:Commons Autoconfirmed-2000px.png. So this is basically a {{Duplicate}} McZusatz (talk) 15:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.--
Cyrax (Comando) 02:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
_Daewoo_BF106_Ordinary_Fare.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_-_Walters_TL200920218.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Daewoo_BF106_Ordinary_Fare.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Daewoo_BF106_Ordinary_Fare.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_ASEAN.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This is not a true svg. It contains the bitmap of File:Commons Confirmed-2000px.png. So this is basically a {{Duplicate}} McZusatz (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.-- Cyrax (Comando) 02:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
logo -> non libre Tiraden (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Text-logo, extremely simple. Fma12 (talk) 22:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Yann (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
logo from a football club. Taken from the website of the club and most likely copyright protected Miho (talk) 18:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The ball gives the logo some grade of complexity. Although I'm not completely sure I should delete it to avoid claimings for CR protection. Fma12 (talk) 22:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Artist: w:Percy Metcalfe, date of death 1970. This appears to have been a work for hire; Metcalf probably did not work directly for the government of Ireland, so {{PD-IrishGov}} doesn't apply. Unfree in the US until 2024 and in Ireland until 2041 forever. Category:Undelete in 2041 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Actually, it's under perpetual copyright, and will never be free in Ireland per current laws: Commons:MONEY#Ireland. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
This was already deleted once before. There is no verifiable evidence to support the theory that the ornament was once in red. Fry1989 eh? 20:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- I found on http://www.vexillographia.ru/kazakhst/state1.htm, that the first version (perheps project) of new Kazakh flag had a red ornament. Malarz pl (talk) 07:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Translating it, it seems to directly quote the legislation of 1992. That's a source we didn't have when this was deleted last time, but since we have it now, it can stay. I withdraw my nomination. Fry1989 eh? 19:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn FASTILY (TALK) 06:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
_-_Walters_TL200920218.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Walters_TL200920218.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am nominating this item and others in Category:Promised gifts to the Walters Art Museum for deletion.
Promised gift item, no permission from the Walters Aude (talk) 21:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
_-_Walters_TL200920218.jpg){kind=link}
We did a batch upload of ~20,000 images from the Walters Art Museum a few months ago. See: Category:Media contributed by the Walters Art Museum and Commons:Walters Art Museum
We mistakenly uploaded a subset that are in Category:Promised gifts to the Walters Art Museum, which are promised gift items. The Walters doesn't have the permission to be granting us permission (the OTRS stuff) and we shouldn't have uploaded these.
Now, I realize the items are old enough to be in public domain anyway, but if any of it is going to make it's way on to Commons, we'd rather it not be part of the official donation and have these deleted from the batch upload. The derivative work part is the photograph, which on the Walters website is marked as CC-BY-NC but via OTRS we have them as CC-BY-SA 3.0. The metadata (specifically, the descriptions) are also CC-BY-NC, except where we have OTRS permission. (for everything in their donation, except those in this category)
Deletion is requested as a sacrifice in favor of ongoing broader partnership with the Walters and for all the images we did get with clear permission, etc. Furthermore, we want the Walters to have a good experience with working with Wikimedia Commons and hopefully inspire other institutions to also contribute.
In practical terms, it's problematic to have these images on Commons, with the OTRS tag, the descriptions, etc. which we don't have permission for. To make things totally clear, we request deletion of the items in the promised gift category. Cheers. Aude (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
_-_Walters_TL200920218.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as a courtesy (and for copyright reasons because of the metadata, in any case). These were clearly uploaded in error, and we should respect the wishes of the Walters since it is their goodwill that has brought us so many high-quality images already. Only ~20 of the hundreds of photos here have been used so far, so there is very little disruption that will be caused since this was caught so soon. Dominic (talk) 21:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete (except images in use) per Aude and Dominic. The Walters Museum has been very generous to Commons and I don't think it will hurt us too much to remove these as a courtesy. Kaldari (talk) 00:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as a courtesy, as they were uploaded in error. It does not reflect well on any party to have images uploaded of uncertain copyright status, so in the meantime it is reasonable to remove them. Images where the status is later clarified can be undeleted later. Harej (talk) 20:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
_-_Walters_TL200920218.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio (original building made by a famous architect) Remi Mathis (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- As far as I know, if the law is not clear (as it is in this case, it is a precaution) you don't delete the file, you put a warning, because peeple can still use it for some purposes and in some countries. In any case, considering that 1/3 of the photo is the sky, 1/3 is the ground and half of the library is covered by trees, in my opinion you can just rename it "Parvis descartes - debourg" and it becomes a simple photo of a panorama...
- P.S. In any case, can I at least know the name of this "famous" architect? --Alexmar983 (talk) 12:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (original building made by a famous architect) Remi Mathis (talk) 11:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- à retransférer sur Wikipédia pour la liberté de panorama, mais je ne sais pas faire... Nonopoly (talk) 11:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
the original map (sourced) 
is totally different Dzlinker (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Should have mentioned the propaganda driven by this user as he took the pain to insert his unsourced work in more than 10 project - Dzlinker (talk) 13:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- +1, voire cette discussion sur la carte et les référence sur le controle des Zirides sur l'ensemble du Maghreb[4], sur la version farnçaise.--Waran18 (talk) 11:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- KEEP : no valid reason given/own-made map. --Omar-toons (talk) 02:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeremy Clane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo watermarked images, includes facebook link - out of project scope. Low resolution, missing exif - doubtful authorship.
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (24).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (25).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (20).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (21).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (19).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (16).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (17).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (15).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (13).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (14).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (12).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (10).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (11).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (8).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (9).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (7).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (4).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (5).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (6).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (2).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (1).jpg
- File:Jeremy clane-46 (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 04:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 21:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WackerNeuson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos not in full resolution taken with many different cameras or without exif. Some of them can be found on the internet, some of them marked as copyvio.
- File:Wacker Neuson Radlader WL57.jpg
- File:Wacker Neuson Bagger 50Z3.jpg
- File:Weidemann Teleskopradlader 4270 CX100 T.jpg
- File:Weidemann Radlader 4070 CX100.jpg
- File:Weidemann Teleskoplader T4512 CC40.jpg
- File:Weidemann Hoftrac 1140 CX30.jpg
- File:Weidemann Hoftrac WSTS 130 FD.jpg
- File:Weidemann Produktionswerk Korbach.jpg
- File:Kramer Einsatz.jpg
- File:WEID Teleskop.jpg
- File:WEID Hoftrac.jpg
- File:DPU 10070actBE.jpg
- File:WN Rent BS Aussenansicht 29-klein3.jpg
- File:9503 P1000462 BE-Ausschnitt.jpg
- File:Kramer Pfullendorf RGB.jpg
- File:RCP RCE Drill 03 RGB.jpg
- File:Neusonkramer linz RGB.jpg
- File:Bs602i action.tif
- File:Bs602i action.jpg
Art-top (talk) 08:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- The following files do not exist in an higher resolution. However, they all are sharp and of good quality, so please let them online.
- I will reupload the following files in an higher resolution:
- File:Wacker Neuson Radlader WL57.jpg
- File:Wacker Neuson Bagger 50Z3.jpg
- File:Weidemann Teleskopradlader 4270 CX100 T.jpg
- File:Weidemann Radlader 4070 CX100.jpg
- File:Weidemann Teleskoplader T4512 CC40.jpg
- File:Weidemann Hoftrac 1140 CX30.jpg
- File:Weidemann Hoftrac WSTS 130 FD.jpg
- File:Weidemann Produktionswerk Korbach.jpg
- The following files can be deleted:
- Wacker Neuson (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:Canaluldestiri
[edit]
Images are most probably copyrighted because they can be found on various sites. --Smooth_O (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan fran morales (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution for own work, no original exif - doubtful authorship.
Art-top (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution promo images without exif or taken with different cameras. Doubtful authorship. Look like as promo action - probably out of project scope.
- File:Brice TRIBAL (ТРАЙБЛ).jpg
- File:Рейчел Брайс.JPG
- File:Рейчел.jpg
- File:Р Брайс.jpg
- File:Брайс.jpg
- File:TRIBAL*Kamali.jpg
- File:*Татьяна Зинкевич*.jpg
- File:Kamali*.JPG
- File:Kamali.jpg
- File:Татьяна Kamali.jpg
- File:*Kamali*.jpg
- File:Руки.jpg
- File:Kamali.JPG
- File:Татьяна Зинкевич.JPG
- File:Татьяна Зинкевич (Kamali).jpg
- File:Rachelbrice..jpg
- File:Татьяна Зинкевич (Kamali).JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 08:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- These might be in scope, but the copyright issue needs to be fixed. Yann (talk) 07:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lovetrance (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional photos in low resolution without exif or taken with different cameras - doubtful authorship. Some of them marked as copyvio.
- File:Block 15-16.jpg
- File:Hotel Pliska.jpg
- File:BLU Offices.jpg
- File:Benchmark Tower.jpg
- File:Kopitoto TV Tower.jpg
- File:Sopharma Business Towers.jpg
- File:Mega Park Sofia.jpg
- File:Block 1V.jpg
- File:Princess Hotel.jpg
- File:Vivacom.jpg
- File:Vertigo Building.jpg
- File:Park Hotel Moskva.jpg
- File:Park Sankt Peterburg Hotel.jpg
- File:Hotel Rodina.jpg
- File:Hotel Hemus.jpg
- File:Hotel Mirage.jpg
- File:CITUB.jpg
Art-top (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship. See above.
- File:Pliska Hotel.jpg
- File:KHZ.jpg
- File:Block 11-12.jpg
- File:Sopharma Towers.jpg
- File:BG TV Tower.jpg
Art-top (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete copy/paste collection from around the web. Latest two images taken from [5] and [6] -Justass (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, all uploads by this user are stolen from other websites. --Martin H. (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adslsplitter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo images - doubtful authorship, probably out of project scope.
Art-top (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
4 out of the 7 picture this user has uploaded were pulled from the SFU website. These are very similar to the others, low-res and about the same university.
Vera (talk) 16:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio per nom. INeverCry 20:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This shows the 2004 museum addition, which will be copyrighted for many years yet to come under France's 70 years pma duration. Since there is no freedom of panorama in France, photographs of copyrighted buildings are not allowed. cmadler (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Also File:Musée national de Préhistoire (Les Eyzies-de-Tayac-Sireuil).jpg. cmadler (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The Museum consists of a modern entrance, but especially of buildings dating from the Middle Ages. The two are mixed on the image. All modern buildings are not shown. This ambiguity could be that we keep these two images. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The two images have the 2004 addition in the same proportion as the old buildings. We can't say that they are not the main subject of picture, and there is no FOP in France. Daniel Message 11:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The principal part of the building dates from the Middle Ages, it's the same case that the Louvre Pyramid.--Citron (talk) 17:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- The case of the Louvre pyramid is essentially a de minimis situation (not exactly de minimis, but a pretty close analogue under French civil law). The copyrighted work must be an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" and its presence must be unavoidable, and I don't think that's the case here. In both of these photos, the new (copyrighted) portion of the building takes up more—much more—of the photo than the old building, so I don't think it can be deemed merely an "accessory". Further, both images seem to be framed to include both the new and old buildings; the inclusion of the new building (or at least, of so much of the new building) doesn't seem unavoidable but rather deliberate. Rather than compare to File:Louvre at night centered.jpg, which is allowable for the above reasons, I think this may be more comparable to something like this or this, which are deliberately framed to juxtapose the old and new, and would not be allowable on Commons. cmadler (talk) 12:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep as per Commons:De minimis, but I also consider it below the threshold of originality. --P199 (talk) 04:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep as said above, and the picture can be cropped instead of being deleted if needed. Jeriby (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Estive contribuindo com imagens feitas por mim durante muito tempo, porém tenho sido acusado em um artigo, por umc erto usuário de ter problemas com minhas lincensas (ninguém, em anos, nunca me informou disso) para carregar as fotos (estão me acusando de estar carregando fotos que não foram feitas por mim, ou seja violando direito autoral, o que é uma calúnia absurda), para minha surpresa tive meu último carregamento eliminado, porém não obtive nenhuma explicação do por que várias outras imagens feitas e carregadas por mim continuam a estar diponíveis, se for pra eliminar, que eliminem todos, sem excessão, (até por que, se há problema em um há em todos), já que todos foram carregados por mim extamente da mesma forma.(TODAS as fotos contidas nessa montagem são de minha única e exclusiva autoria)obs: tenho duas contas de usuário, tanto como Asdrubol como Felipe Mostarda. Felipe Mostarda (talk) 12:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - the file is in use and GFDL/CC licenses are irrevocable. The uploader appears to be claiming that he made the photo. COM:FOP#Brazil says FOP in São Paulo is OK. I have trouble believing the uploader's claim of copyvio. — Jeff G. ツ 00:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- The user Felipe Mostarda can even claim to be the author of the images, but he can not prove it. No links or source has been presented so far to prove that the photographs on this collage were taken by him. It is wise to remove all images that user, at least until he proves to be the real author. Heitor C. Jorge (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- You had first tagged this as "no source", although this was given as own work. You then escaleted with a {{Copyvio}} tag, without any pointer to what this would infringe on. I see no reason to doubt that this is own work, but it would be nice if Asdrubol could upload some originals too. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC).
- The user Felipe Mostarda can even claim to be the author of the images, but he can not prove it. No links or source has been presented so far to prove that the photographs on this collage were taken by him. It is wise to remove all images that user, at least until he proves to be the real author. Heitor C. Jorge (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
If anyone challenges his ownership of the images, they need to prove who the rightful copyright holder is. It is not the responsibility of the owner to prove that they are the owner, nor is it practical to be required to do so. KDBerg
Kept. I see no reason to doubt that this was own work so no need to delete. MGA73 (talk) 21:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
no provenance supplied for components of montage DS (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - as last time; such nominations that just disregard previous DRs are such a waste of time. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- I had no idea that this had been nominated before. And it's still flawed: there is no indication of provenance. Where do these photos come from? DS (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- A hint to a newbie: if the "discussion" tab is blue, you should look at it before nominating. The photos are own work, as he uploader wrote above. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Pieter Kuiper, I'd take it as a personal favor if you didn't abuse my friends like that. DragonflySixtyseven had a legitimate concern, and making dismissive/degrading comments in a harsh voice isn't the proper way to dispel such a concern. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- And DS is abusing the Brazilian uploader. Concerns had been addressed before. Yet he won't withdraw the DR. Such a waste of everybody's time. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Pieter Kuiper, I'd take it as a personal favor if you didn't abuse my friends like that. DragonflySixtyseven had a legitimate concern, and making dismissive/degrading comments in a harsh voice isn't the proper way to dispel such a concern. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- A hint to a newbie: if the "discussion" tab is blue, you should look at it before nominating. The photos are own work, as he uploader wrote above. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I had no idea that this had been nominated before. And it's still flawed: there is no indication of provenance. Where do these photos come from? DS (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Until the list of images that was used to create the collage is added to the file description page, we can't just 'assume' that they're all fine. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept In the first DR, the uploader says, among other things:
- "TODAS as fotos contidas nessa montagem são de minha única e exclusiva autoria"
I see no reason to doubt that clear statement. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:52, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
that thing on the left, that makes it not PD Sven Manguard Wha? 20:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: TeliaSonera pebble must be removed. The result of Kcell logo (containing TeliaSonera pebble) is modification and became File:Kcell wordmark.svg. --112.210.11.149 07:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: And i want to ask a question if you let. What did you mean "PD". I'm afraid that I didn't understand. And thanks for warning. Have a good day. The Emirr Disscussion 18:55, 09 June 2012 (UTC+3)
- PD is public domain. The icon on the left of the image is origional enough that the license being used by the file is invalid. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- What about now? I hope it's alright. Just like Microsoft's. The Emirr Disscussion 18:29, 10 June 2012 (UTC+3)
- Delete As long as I know, {{PD-textlogo}} and {{PD-ineligible}} are not applied to any logos (of course except simple triangle, square etc., they are not logos) under the Turkish copyright law and I've never seen such applications in precedents. If you can show us the converse case, you will help us. {{PD-TR}} is valid to some logos.Turkcell was founded in February 1994. According to the Turkish copyright law, In case the first owner of the work is a legal person, the protection period is 70 years from the date that the work is published. 1994 + 70 = 2064. Probably this logo was accepted as ineligible one in the United State, but not in Turkey.In Turkish Wikipedia, the logo of Turkcell was uploaded as non-free fair use file.Takabeg (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Relisted on 02:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
There is no evidence on the site that any use is allowed for. russavia (talk) 00:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The same problem was in December 2010 with File:Sanitky, sestava Rendez-Vous, ZZS PAK.jpg. I uploaded this files from the web site www.zachrannasluzba.cz. Permission is available in the gallery (Czech): "Pokud není přímo na fotografii uvedeno jinak, můžete fotografie z této galerie libovolně použít pod podmínkou uvedení autora a zdroje (např. v podobě "foto Jan Novák, www.zachrannasluzba.cz")." It is the first yellow sentence here. It means in English (Google translate): "If it is not directly on the photo below, you may photos from this gallery use freely, provided the author and source (eg in the form of a "photo Jan Novák, www.zachrannasluzba.cz")." Please see this discussion (Czech), there are more informations about permission from this web site. Sorry for my poor English, I hope you understand me. --Midi7 (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Source page allows free use with mentioning the author Funfood ␌ 23:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no evidence on the site that any use is allowed for. russavia (talk) 00:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agusta A109K2's ATE Slovakia & Rega Switzerland air ambulance operators.jpg, it is the same case. --Midi7 (talk) 20:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted. No reason to delete. Permission visible on top of the source page properly linked from the permission field. --Mormegil (talk) 08:47, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Coronets in British royal monograms
[edit]- File:Royal Monogram of Princess Diana of Wales.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Prince Alfred as Duke of Edinburgh.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Empress Victoria of Germany as Princess Royal of Great Britain.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Princess Louise of Great Britain.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Prince Alfred as Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of The Duke and Duchess of Windsor.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.svg
- File:Dual Cypher of Prince William and Princess Catherine of Great Britain.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Queen Mary (of Teck) of Great Britain.svg
_of_Great_Britain.svg){kind=link}
Per my post on Glasshouse's talk page (User talk:Glasshouse#Coronets in British royal monograms) one year ago (and Keivan.f's post there four months ago {User talk:Glasshouse#Royal Monogram of Prince William, Prince Harry and Catherine}): Glasshouse has produced inaccurate work, this has been brought to her/his attention and s/he has corrected some but not all of her/his (otherwise excellent) works. --† DBD 12:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep that is not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Factual inaccuracy is not a valid reason for deletion?! Well, I'll be...! † DBD 08:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not when files can be corrected, no. Fry1989 eh? 19:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware that they can be, but they have not been, despite the author being aware of their inaccuracies for more than a year. † DBD 13:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- That is your personal problem. You can't force anyone here to edit their files to your standards. It is still not a reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:40, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware that they can be, but they have not been, despite the author being aware of their inaccuracies for more than a year. † DBD 13:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not when files can be corrected, no. Fry1989 eh? 19:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Factual inaccuracy is not a valid reason for deletion?! Well, I'll be...! † DBD 08:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think he won't correct them. Specially monogram of Catherine. If he correct them, then I'll agree to keep them, like Fry1989. Keivan.f (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if he "corrects" them to your special opinion, this is not a valid reason for deletion. Oh, and "I'll agree to keep them"? Who the hell do you think you are? Fry1989 eh? 18:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Now we can keep them but the monogram of Diana is NOT correct because she was not the wife of a child of the Sovereign. She was the wife of the British Heir Apparent and she should have the Coronet of the British Heir Apparent like Camilla. And also I just said my opinion dear Fry1989. Relax! Keivan.f (talk) 11:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Fry1989 is absolutely correct; a coronet change is NOT a valid reason for deletion. In the research I've done, I've found that heraldic crown and coronet standards for monograms were not very strickly adhered to in European monarchies, including the UK, until the late 19th and early 20th century, but more so in the latter part of the 20th century. In many countries, including those that have princely, ducal or comital heraldic crowns such as Denmark, all members of the royal family use an arched sovereign crown just like the monarch's. Often, a generic crown is and has been used on monograms for various royal houses throughout history, including Britain. Personal stationery especially is lax in the type of crown used.
However, for some reason this seems to be a desperately troublesome topic so to preclude any diaper fillage, I have reviewed the listed entries:
- File:Royal Monogram of Princess Diana of Wales.svg This monogram is already correct. As the wife of the child of the monarch, her monogram contained the coronet portion of the Crown of a Child of a Sovereign--crosses with fleur de lis.
- File:Royal Monogram of Prince Alfred as Duke of Edinburgh.svg This has been changed to the full Crown of a Child of a Sovereign
- File:Royal Monogram of Empress Victoria of Germany as Princess Royal of Great Britain.svg This has been changed the full Crown of a Child of a Sovereign
- File:Royal Monogram of Princess Louise of Great Britain.svg This is already correct. The coronet is from the Crown of a Child of a Sovereign--crosses with fleur de lis.
- File:Royal Monogram of Prince Alfred as Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.svg I have changed this to a generic, common crown.
- File:Royal Monogram of The Duke and Duchess of Windsor.svg This coronet has been changed to that of a Child of a Sovereign--crosses with fleur de lis.
- File:Royal Monogram of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.svg This coronet has been changed to that of the Crown of a Child of the Heir Apparent.
- File:Dual Cypher of Prince William and Princess Catherine of Great Britain.svg This one will be changed. I'm going to re-do the entire image.
- File:Royal Monogram of Queen Mary (of Teck) of Great Britain.svg This is already correct. As the spouse of a sovereign, the coronet is the same as those used in the various sovereign crowns—crosses with fleur de lis.
--Glasshouse (talk) 00:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's great work so far, Glasshouse – and my sincere thanks for finding the time for these corrections. However:
- File:Royal Monogram of Princess Diana of Wales.svg Diana was the former wife of the heir apparent. Shouldn't her coronet have a single arch?
- File:Royal Monogram of Princess Louise of Great Britain.svg shows a double-arched British sovereign's crown. It ought to be without arches. (Also, it might be nice to clarify which Louise this is.)
- File:Royal Monogram of Queen Mary (of Teck) of Great Britain.svg conversely shows no arches (child of sovereign) while she was a wife-of-sovereign (two arches). Or are arches omitted because the crown is 'slipped' around the monogram? † DBD 18:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
This goes back to what I stated earlier; "crown and coronet standards for monograms were not very strickly adhered to in European monarchies, including the UK." If you look at the source for Queen Mary's monogram, you'll see that it comes from a button of The Womens Royal Army Corps. And if you'll Google "Princess Diana Stationery" you'll see that she never used an arched coronet, though Camilla, as Duchess of Corwall, and spouse to the very same man, does. The rules are not set in stone.--Glasshouse (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Great stuff. We're done here. You have my thanks and I withdraw this deletion request. † DBD 15:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you dear Glasshouse for correcting those monograms. Thank you very much. Keivan.fTalk 18:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Withdrawn -FASTILY (TALK) 09:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)