Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.Logo.jpeg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-oxid_beschichtet.JPG){kind=link}
![161 File:Segnale " 0 - 24 ".PNG](#File:Segnale_"_0_-_24_".PNG){kind=link}
,_Montpellier..JPG){kind=link}
![172 File:"The emigrants" - detail of the commemorative plaque. - geograph.org.uk - 1365574.jpg](#File:"The_emigrants"_-_detail_of_the_commemorative_plaque._-_geograph.org.uk_-_1365574.jpg){kind=link}
![219 File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg](#File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg){kind=link}
this is just porn Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, blatant copyright violation Infrogmation (talk) 02:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Photograph, obviously not {{PD-ineligible}} as tagged. January (talk) 10:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, yoinked photo with clearly absurd bogus copyright claim. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 12:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 12:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Maybe too complex to be here without OTRS permission? Stefan4 (talk) 21:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: I've been monitoring this user since I gave a final warning on 28 July. Clearly another false claim of own work. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment I gave up trying to explain that in Italy the so - called no-FOP has never been enforced because was never stated by anyone. I am confident that, as well understanding that we have the rule of 20 years for worldwide public domain, somedeay someone will acknowledge that Italy has FOP. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy - this building was recently modernized by famous architect Fuksas 93.39.206.242 15:08, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Keep the statement "this building was recently modernized by famous architect Fuksas " is false. For unknown reasons there's a widespread urban legend according which Fuksas redesigned the Palazzo dello Sport. Actually Fuksas was called to design an installation for the inauguration of the renewed building in 2003; such installation is no longer in place. Fuksas had no further role in the modernisation. That can be easily found in this article from the italian newspaper la Repubblica. -- Blackcat (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete That building's obviously not 70 years old (or whatever the required age is to fall into public domain). It doesn't matter who designed it: someone did, and that someone owns the copyright. Buddy431 (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: all possible FOP issues are DM Jcb (talk) 23:47, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Deleted: per NOM. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hammersoft as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: While the source does indicate "creative commons" in the caption of the image, it does not indicate what creative commons license. It could be a non-commercial license. We don't know. As such, this is a copyright violation and incompatible with Commons. Converted from a speedy to a regular DR by me, as it's not a clear copyright. Needs some clarification. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Whether an image is available under a license compatible with Commons is a yes/no proposition. Either it meets the requirements or it doesn't. The problem here is the source indicates in the caption of the photograph "(Creative Commons)". This doesn't inform us as to what the license actually is. It could very well be a non-commercial license. We simply don't know. Without confirmation that the license is in fact compatible with Commons requirements, it's not a free license for our purposes. Not surprisingly, the image appears to be lifted. Have a look at this source. On that source, the image caption notes "Peter Kramer/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images". Oops. This one is toasty. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of being adequately free. Ryan Vesey Review me! 20:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep when he is he [[5]] we can need it for his article Ian Joy
- Withdraw nomination. I've added this to the article. INeverCry 23:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Denniss (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of copyrighted material High Contrast (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
document without permission Art-top (talk) 23:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 19:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Probably logo of not significant site/organization. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 23:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 00:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 00:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I, the uploader, have uploaded another "plain" image under the name "Jackson Atoll, Spratly Islands.png". I'm going to use wiki markup code to show captions on the image to illustrate for some Wikipedia articles instead of putting fixed text on image like this one. Please delete this file. Thank you. ParacelIslandsDispute (talk) 00:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request. INeverCry 19:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unknown persons, some homepage picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I am no longer using it anymore. Wahyudi.pradana (talk) 06:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request. INeverCry 19:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I am no longer using it anymore Wahyudi.pradana (talk) 06:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request. INeverCry 19:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Baumkopf (talk) 09:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request. INeverCry 19:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: not a notable person. GeorgHH • talk 12:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: bad quality photo of domesticated dog. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
a person of no notability Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:21, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
(I am the creator and uploader of this file.) Superseded by File:Alt plate.svg, which is more accurate to the sign that this file is intended to represent. All users should be using the other file, which is far more competently designed than my own. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 01:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. Dough4872 03:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete—per nom (who's being quite humble here). Imzadi 1979 → 03:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Alt plate.svg. –Fredddie™ 03:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Rschen7754 03:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
This image has a wrong title. It has a duplicate File:Ślewiński Śpiąca kobieta z kotem 1896.jpg with the right, accurate title in the same category. Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 07:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. Yann (talk) 07:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation has essentially informed Commons that an item with about any depth at all should be considered a 3D work and not eligible for {{PD-art}} when it stated that photographs of old coins are copyrightable: see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. This work too involves some depth, and there is possibility for creativity within. It is entirely plausible that a US court would rule this work copyrightable; this image ought to be deleted for that reason per COM:PCP. . Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Question: When was this photo taken and published? The text says: "From the 1905 Breasted Expedition and the Oriental Institute". I agree that we can't keep photos of 3D works just because the work is ancient. The photo itself also needs to be free. But if the photo is from 1905 then it is pre 1923 as the license says. --MGA73 (talk) 12:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The Breasted Expeditions to Egypt were done from 1905 to 1907 by the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. PD-US on the photo would look to be right. (The Ancient Egyptian inscription which this photo is derivative of is of course PD.) -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as per Infrogmation. Yann (talk) 07:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Painting on the wall are clearly less than 70 years old and thus can't be in the public domain. Picture taken in France, country without Com:FoP. Maybe Com:De minimis applies since the painting is accessory to the whole picture of the building ? Léna (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- I am the author of this photo. In principle, there is no problem... The military building dates from about 1880 and we can consider that the paintings are accessories. De minimis principle should apply (there is just a little french flag painted and also a wife jogger). So, it seems to me that this is not the original work of an artist but the work of anonymous painters of the army. So, in principle, the French army applies the fair use... --34 super héros (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- There is no fair use in French law, and work from the French army IS copyrighted like any other work. It is not just a french flag but the logo of the army (or specifically the land-based army). Léna (talk) 19:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am the author of this photo. In principle, there is no problem... The military building dates from about 1880 and we can consider that the paintings are accessories. De minimis principle should apply (there is just a little french flag painted and also a wife jogger). So, it seems to me that this is not the original work of an artist but the work of anonymous painters of the army. So, in principle, the French army applies the fair use... --34 super héros (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep IMO, the artwork is not central, I'd say it's De minimis. However the fair use thing is just false, there is no fair use in France, and artwork made for/by government agencies are copyrighted. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: as per PierreSelim. Yann (talk) 07:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
William Rothenstein died in 1945, therefor not yet Public Domain Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:21, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. This was first published by HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY, in the US, before 1923. PD-US. -- Alba (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US as per Alba. Yann (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
.Logo.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Logo.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No proof that en:Council of Higher Secondary Education, Orissa released their logo as creative Commons. According to the article it is only 29 yrs old so it is not PD-old. On en-wiki en:File:CHSE(O).Logo.jpeg is uploaded as fair use. MGA73 (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
.Logo.jpeg){kind=link}
.Logo.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
.Logo.jpeg){kind=link}
No license. Is this even free? What happend here? Looks messy. MGA73 (talk) 11:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshots. Yann (talk) 07:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
A list of phone numbers of temples. Looks out of scope. Sreejith K (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: This is 3D. Yann (talk) 08:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Is this really simple enough? The thing to the left looks complex to me. Stefan4 (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It appears to be the letters Б, H, and Т juxtaposed together. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private drawing - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 17:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
This has been overwritten by a file which looks like a copyright violation in my opinion. Stefan4 (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Reverted and deleted Yann (talk) 08:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution for own work, first source - "Google". Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unnecessary pixel graphic version, there is a better SVG version. Ras67 (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 08:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Image of an architectural monument not in the public domain. Le Corbusier die in 1967. Miniwark (talk) 18:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep : Yes, the architect died in 1967. But as I explained in the description, the photo is free of rights according freedom of panorama, because the construction is not enough original. This looks like a very ordinary cabin. Only original buildings are copyrighted.
- You can look at File:EDC Paris La Défense.JPG. This is an ordinary recent building. The deletion request has been canceled. See the discussion page : File talk:EDC Paris La Défense.JPG. The discussion about deletion is here : Commons:Deletion requests/File:EDC Paris La Défense.JPG. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per Tangopaso. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Most probably copyrighted image Smooth_O (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 08:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
This logo is non-free logo on en.wiki (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ice_Age_logo.svg). Smooth_O (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Well, it shouldn't be. In fact I'll be transferring it to Commons shortly. Delete this one for the separate reason that it'll be a raster copy of a vector image. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 08:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
no license Sealle (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Too blurry to be useful. Yann (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note: I have undeleted the en.wiki version. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Very simple design. Not enough originality. Yann (talk) 08:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: General view. Any detail would be de minimis. Yann (talk) 08:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: General view. Any detail would be de minimis. Yann (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: General view. Any detail would be de minimis. Yann (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: General view. Any detail would be de minimis. Yann (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, probably COM:DW. Wknight94 talk 20:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful own work. COM:DW from unknown source. Wknight94 talk 20:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE and unused. Unknown subject. Just some guy. Wknight94 talk 20:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE and unused. What is this supposed to be, a Lego? Wknight94 talk 20:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Image my be used for any non commercial purpose with attribution to - "Pip Starr www.starr.tv"
This contradicts with the CC-BY licence claim. Does the CC-BY claim invalidate the text above? Stefan4 (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete In general, we take the precautionary principle for ambiguous licenses. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: NC only. Yann (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 20:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Windows 8 symbol.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 08:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Low-res, no EXIF. Looks like a professional photo. INeverCry 21:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 21:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
in scope, but possibly copvio [[6]] --AtelierMonpli (talk) 08:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Good job on finding the id for him. This does look like a copyvio though. INeverCry 16:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
No source, SVG at File:Flag of Argentina.svg Fry1989 eh? 00:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested, now that File:Flag of Russia.svg has finally been updated to a realistic set of colours. Fry1989 eh? 01:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
The original upload description for this 1985 painting was "I am currently working for the artist who created this work, and he has given his expressed consent for this work to be shown on the internet. The photograph is from his own files." Thus it is released for use on the Internet, but not actually public domain (or free licensed). Kaldari (talk) 01:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
The quality of this image makes it's potential use difficult. I've been intending on requesting the NY Senate seal be made in SVG for some time in the Graphic Lab, but am waiting on some Governor's seals to be made first. Fry1989 eh? 02:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Official sorority logo; no evidence of permission or PD-status GrapedApe (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Everything else this person has uploaded is a copyvio, so I have doubts about this. Serious doubts. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Everything else this person has uploaded is a copyvio, so I have doubts about this. Serious doubts. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused image of an unidentified person Sreejith K (talk) 06:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
The logo is uploaded as {{PD-textlogo}}. On en:File:BTV-logo2009.png it is uploaded as fair use. Personally I think it IS rather simple allthough there is some light effect. So what do you think? Simple enough or above Threshold of originality? MGA73 (talk) 10:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No proof that en:Biorecro released their logo as cc-by-3.0.. It could perhaps be PD-ineligible or something. File on en-wiki en:File:Biorecrologo.jpg is uploaded as fair use. MGA73 (talk) 11:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
On source page is no information that the picture is from NASA. That is unlikely too, because the Satellite is from Germany and was lauched by an European Ariane 4 rocket. 178.6.52.33 11:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Is this really {{PD-textlogo}}? The shield and the ball looks like something that many other uses and the rest is mostly text So perhaps. According to en:Club de Fútbol Laguna the club is from 1953 so it is not PD-old. On en-wiki en:File:CF Laguna.gif is uploaded as fair use. MGA73 (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no license (no license).
No license. Is this even free? Perhaps {{PD-textlogo}}? What happend here? Looks messy. MGA73 (talk) 11:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image by Walther Riem, published in 1928. Certainly not CC-1.0. Jergen (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned back cover image ao an book published in 1928. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image of an book published in 1930. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned back cover image of a Scouting magazine published in 1931. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image of a Scout magazine published in 1931. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image of a Scout magazine published in 1930. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image of a Scout magazine published in 1928. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image of a Scout magazine published in 1923. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Scanned cover image of a Scout magazine published in 1932. Certainly not CC-1.0.| Jergen (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file contains a song on a public wall in Israel. Israel has FOP, but this sign isn't perminent matanya • talk 12:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Yann (talk) 14:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Self-promotion. This author had made several pages for himself on English Wikipedia, all of which were deleted for lack of notability. It's time for the images to go too. MisterUnit (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Somewhat questionable permission. Uploaded by some Fratcubby to :en (trustworthy?), claimed to be from some "KB Jones", now said to be from some "K James". -- Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. This is a list of Phone numbers of Temples at Kumbakonam neighbourhood, so its more like an advertisement. Sreejith K (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
The text could be copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot. Sreejith K (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Promotional context, includes facebook link, watermarked picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 15:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Promotional context, includes facebook link, watermarked picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 15:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by GeorgHH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: art work by an living artist (fr:Mang Le Doan Chanh). Converted by me from a speedy to DR, as uploader might be identical to the artist, as he uploaded only works of Mang and edit only in the article about Mang on :fr wikipedia. As he hasn't be active since 2010, we might try contact the artist directly. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Michelleopusmang.jpg
- File:Sud.jpg
- File:Hotelmeuble.jpg
- File:Fumoir1.jpg
- File:Cheminee.jpg
- File:Eclipseopusmang.JPG
- File:Lesvoisins.jpg
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I doubt that {{PD-ineligible}} applies in this case. Leyo 16:08, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a file initially uploaded on Japanese Wikipedia as the uploader's "friend's work (友人が撮影)" which requires the uploader's approval before anyone can use. The uploader asserts here that this is his own work, but such a claim has no credibility. This picture is taken by someone else than the uploader, and he is not in a position to legally license this work. Fabrication of authorship constitutes serious copyright violation. Tomo suzuki (talk) 16:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence of permission for {{Cc-zero}}. I'm not convinced that it is sufficiently simple for {{PD-textlogo}}. Stefan4 (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
unnecessary opaque version with incorrect colors, TM sign is missing Ras67 (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. Stefan4 (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
The "V" looks awfully complex. Without any indication of the opposite, I would assume that Ireland inherited the British copyright law (and thus the British threshold of originality) upon gaining independence. Stefan4 (talk) 18:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence that this is below the Swiss threshold of originality. Stefan4 (talk) 18:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
A logo we do not have permission to use. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
-oxid_beschichtet.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-oxid_beschichtet.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
-oxid_beschichtet.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
-oxid_beschichtet.JPG){kind=link}
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=906930037#File:Milano_piazza_Missori_pal_Assicuraz_Sociali.jpg){kind=link}
No use, SVG of full logo at File:Windows 8 Logo.svg Fry1989 eh? 20:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Was only used in one wikipedia to display a specific formula (now replaced by LaTeX code). Torsch (talk) 21:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Was only used in one wikipedia to display a specific formula (now replaced by LaTeX code). Torsch (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Was only used in one wikipedia to display a specific formula (now replaced by LaTeX code). Torsch (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Was only used in one wikipedia to display a specific formula (now replaced by LaTeX code). Torsch (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 21:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
"This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art." A breast star is not a two-dimensional work of art, it is 3D, and the photo contains more than the star anyhow, meaning we need photographer permission. Courcelles 21:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
See en:User talk:Emilianogarciag: the user has a history of uploading copyright violations. Many of the ones I found on Wikipedia were cut out from some other image. I suspect that this one also has been cut out from some image, although I can't tell which one. Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 21:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
uncorrect upload Hopxamax (talk) 22:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Raster version of an existing file, and Made with a non official caracter Gigillo83 (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Raster file of an existing road sign, otherall made using a non-official caracter Gigillo83 (talk) 23:02, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution, no important Exif, not likely to be the uploader's work. Could have come from several Internet sources. David1217 (talk) 23:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Raster version of an already existing road sign, otherall made using a non-official caracter Gigillo83 (talk) 23:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
![23:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/08/12#c-Gigillo83-2012-08-12T23:04:00.000Z-File:Segnale_"_0_-_24_".PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
![00:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/08/12#c-Fastily-2012-08-19T00:15:00.000Z-File:Segnale_"_0_-_24_".PNG){kind=link}
Raster version of an already existing road sign, otherall made using a non-official caracter Gigillo83 (talk) 23:08, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Raster version of an already existing road sign file, otherall made using a non-official caracter Gigillo83 (talk) 23:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
,_Montpellier..JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Montpellier..JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Paintings on the wall are clearly less than 70 years old and thus can't be in the public domain. Picture taken in France, country without Com:FoP Léna (talk) 09:08, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
,_Montpellier..JPG){kind=link}
- The paintings are actually 1990s... The building dates from 1880-1890. This is not the work of a famous artist but it is the work of anonymous painters of the French army. Maybe the fair use applies ... --34 super héros (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. What is this trying to depict here? The art? Then there's no FOP. If it's the building, there's probably not enough originality to merit copyright protection, but then again its just a nondescript building that has no likely encyclopedic use. @34 super héros: Fair use is not allowed at Commons, BTW. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- The building itself has encyclopedic value : it is a late 19th century barracks (and if I'm correct, a National Heritage building). Léna (talk) 07:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Infringes on copyright of the paintings . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
,_Montpellier..JPG){kind=link}
Superseded by File:Bundesstraße 16 number.svg. 84.61.167.13 12:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, as not all browsers and simple graphic software are able to display svg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Bundesstraße 16 number.svg. The files File:Bundesstraße 18 de number.png, File:Bundesstraße 19 de number.png, File:Bundesstraße 20 de number.png, File:Bundesstraße 21 de number.png, and some other Bundesstraßen-PNGs, have already been deleted. 31.4.244.26 12:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Not being able to render SVG is not a valid reason to keep. If used in an article, it will be rendered as a PNG and so there won't be a problem. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted Yann (talk) 10:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Bundesstraße 17 number.svg. 84.61.167.13 16:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, as not all browsers and simple graphic software is able to show svg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:38, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Bundesstraße 17 number.svg. The files File:Bundesstraße 18 de number.png, File:Bundesstraße 19 de number.png, File:Bundesstraße 20 de number.png, File:Bundesstraße 21 de number.png, and some other Bundesstraßen-PNGs, have already been deleted. 31.4.244.26 12:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted Yann (talk) 10:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Artistic craftsmanship notwithstanding, text is still copyrighted. We wouldn't accept the text at Wikipedia, why should we accept a photo of the text here? Numerous precedents like Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Pyramid Stone plaque - geograph.org.uk - 671012.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plaque on the Old Inn Cottage wall - geograph.org.uk - 578981.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Urquhart Castle Entrance Passage sign.jpg. Wknight94 talk 01:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Furthermore, a "work of artistic craftsmanship" would be covered by FOP in the UK. A literary work, ie text like this sign, is not covered by FOP at all.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Infringes on text copyright. We need to remember that the very first copyright laws covered only text, and in that it is covered by FOP in only seven countries. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:52, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: This is 3D. Yann (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Reopening DR - the text is clearly copyrightable. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Yann seems to be alone among admins in his opinion of text on signs. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Forth and Clyde Ship Canal - geograph.org.uk - 260482.jpg and others. Wknight94 talk 15:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't care much, but we need to be consistent. We decided that coins are 3D in copyright issues, where there is much less 3D than here. Yann (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted by Fastily. Yann (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Source page and image
Additional files:
- File:Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge across the Potomac River.jpg: image and page
- File:Liberty Bridge at Falls Park on the Reedy River - Greenville, South Carolina.jpg: image and page
Copyvios from Rosales + Partners site with no evidence of the permissions claimed on the file pages. Content from their site is licensed as CC BY-NC-SA which is not compatible with Commons. The uploader is additionally dishonest in claiming these as their own work.
Given the lack of a free image, the Miguel Rosales image may be viable for fair use. The company has also shown previous willingness to use OTRS. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note: Transferred to w:File:Farnesina.JPG. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note: Transferred to w:File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso roma.JPG. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note: Transferred to w:File:La Spezia - Cattedrale 2.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 20:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is one of 5 carved plaques at the Peace Gardens all used on the English Wikipedia Peace Gardens page. They are carved so not entirely 2-D. One is on a post which is a 3-D object but contains words. I do not mind - I only put up pictures in an attempt to be helpful. It just seems to me silly that some people have decided that items put on public display for information cannot be used for this purpose in Wikipedia. I notice that a picture of a shop front by me was also deleted. Presumably there will be an effort to delete all London blue plaques and any pictures of streets which happen to include posters or signs.Chemical Engineer (talk) 12:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Any with text that has enough creativity to be copyright'able, yes. Wknight94 talk 13:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Under the principle of de minimis most general street views can be kept, but images that have only text as their subject fall under the same prohibition as copying a book. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 20:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 20:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence for PD-USGov given by the uploader High Contrast (talk) 20:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete photo author Jim Cowsert working for US Presswire a USA Today sports media company[8]. Nothing related to US government.--Justass (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jazzz47 as Speedy (User'sRequest) -mattbuck (Talk) 21:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per reasonable uploader's request. It's the proper and most kind thing to do. Doing otherwise will ultimately result in a sort of chilling effect. Also, are we, like, in danger of running out of dick pics or something? - Alison ❤ 18:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - there was only one use, and I replaced it with a perfectly acceptable alternative (File:Autofellatio B-W.jpg, preferred by a number of Wikipedias anyway). We should always weigh the uploader's wishes against the value of the image; since there are alternatives, and the image is on a sensitive topic (!) and the person fairly recognisable from the image - just delete. Put another way (since someone has already voted keep) - what evidence do we have that the uploader is the person depicted, or had their permission (COM:BLP)? The anonymous uploader has no other image uploads or other track record... PS while we're on the subject, doesn't the person in File:Selfsuck.jpg and File:Autofellatio B-W.jpg (uploaded by different users claiming own work) seem to be the same? Rd232 (talk) 01:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sunil balhara1986 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private photos - out of project scope.
- File:Sunil kumar lechurer in ihm bathinda.jpg
- File:Group photo C.H.T. BATCH 2011 IN IHM CHANDIGARH.jpg
Art-top (talk) 23:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajit.vocal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private photos - out of project scope.
- File:Ajit Kumar Acharya with his vocal.JPG
- File:Ajit singer.JPG
- File:Ajit singing a sufi Song.JPG
- File:Ajit singing a Gazal.jpg
Art-top (talk) 23:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Bad quality unused private photos - out of project scope.
Art-top (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photos - out of project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PoisonousKey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs, obviously not {{PD-ineligible}} as tagged.
- File:Lowkey in Gemal Abdel Nasser park, Nablus, Palestine.jpg
- File:Lowkey speaking at Coalition of Resistance rally.jpg
- File:Lowkey performing live.jpg
January (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, yoinked from copyrighted websites; clearly bogus copyright claim -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
German Imperial Eagle Outdated Depictions
[edit]- File:Imperial Coat of arms of Germany (1889–1918).svg
- File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Reichsadler 1889.png
- File:Reichsadler 1888-1918.jpg
- File:German Empire Arms.PNG
.svg){kind=link}
These depictions of the Imperial Eagle of the German Empire are not in use anymore and have been replaced. The first two are derirative works of File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Reichsadler 1889.svg which I as author finally uploaded to replace them. The third one isn't of reasonable quality anymore. The last one has been replaced by a better scan of the source: File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Reichswappen (Klein).png. They should be deleted in order to clean up the category and make it more accessible and comprehensible for those foreign to the matter. --David Liuzzo (talk) 10:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep not a reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 21:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept as per Fry1989. Yann (talk) 08:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katie-marie88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of the user's uploads appear to have been collected from the internet, and given a CC-0 license with no such evidence on the source websites. Two of the images turned out to be CC-BY-2.5-AU, which I fixed, but the others appear to not have a valid license. File:HELP.jpeg is actually from flickr but with a CC-BY-NC-SA license, which is not usable here. File:Risk Dice.jpg is from freedigitalphotos.net from the looks of it; the free 300x400 version appears in many places over the internet; the source site allows many usages but not enough to be considered free; in particular commercial use seems to be prohibited. Have not researched all the others but they appear to be similar.
- File:Risk dice.jpg
- File:HELP.jpeg
- File:Profit-loss-risk.jpg
- File:Risk Mangagement.jpg
- File:Risk-icon.jpg
- File:Risk in text.jpg
- File:Risk Ahead Road Sign.jpg
- File:Risk Dice.jpg
Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:VOA-Cantonese-Tong HK June4th+ Viewers 05May12 480.JPG
- File:VOA-Cantonese-Tong HK June4th+ Tsoi 05May12 230.JPG
- File:VOA-Cantonese-Tong HK June4th+ Bullet 05May12 230.JPG
- File:Cantonese IT CE election vote counting 25mar12 300.JPG
- File:Cantonese Henry Tang and wife 25mar12 300.JPG
- File:IT HK Poll Chung.JPG
- File:Roy Kwong.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-Protester-HK-ourside-elections-25mar12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-Protester-HK-elections-25mar12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-votes-checking-25mar12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-Henry-Tang+-25mar12-300.jpg
- File:Cheng Yiu-tong.jpg
- File:Hsu Chun-hsin.jpg
- File:Cheng Li-chiun.jpg
- File:CHUNG Ting Yiu Robert.jpg
- File:Hsu Yao-Chang.jpg
- File:Tse Ling Kit-ching.jpg
- File:Edward Chan King-sang.jpg
- File:Kao Hua-Chu.jpg
- File:Voa chinese Chang Ching-chung 20120316.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese Gao Wen Qian 18mar12.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese Shi Dinghuan 11mar12.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese Zhang Guobao 11mar12.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese Wang Binghua 11mar12.jpg
- File:Voa chinese Wang Zhaoguo 20120308 300.jpg
- File:Voa chinese Kenneth Liberthal 13Mar12 300.jpg
- File:Hsu Hsin-Ying 2012-03-07.jpg
- File:Liu Chien-Kuo.jpg
- File:Voa chinese Willy Lam 21Feb12.jpg
- File:Grace Meng 17Feb12.jpg
- File:John Wallace 17Feb12.jpg
- File:Venessas Shih.jpg
- File:Tung Chen-yuan.jpg
- File:Lin Yu-chang.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-opening-border-area-15feb12-480.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-hongkong-demonstrators-Chung-proposal-12feb12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-hongkong-demonstrators-against-proposal-12feb12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-hongkong-demonstrators-Cheung-proposal-12feb12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-hongkong-demonstrators-against-Mainland-drivers-12feb12-480.jpg
- File:Franco Mella.JPG
- File:Chen Ting-fei.jpg
- File:Huang Wen-ling.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-Zhang-Hanzhi-talking-VOA-2006-7feb12-300.jpg
- File:VOA-Cantonese-Tong Chin 0616 06Feb12 300.jpg
- File:Voa chinese Douglas Paal 8Nov11 480.jpg
- File:Ha Jin.jpg
- File:Hung Hsiu-Chu.jpg
- File:Jiang Yi-Huah.jpg
- File:Voa chinese Lin Yih-shih 31Jan12 300.jpg
- File:Chen Li-An 22feb10.jpg
- File:Voa xia yeliang 03sep06.jpg
- File:Voa chinese fujian government building 12June10 300.jpg
- File:Voa chinese qing dynasty office 12June10 300.jpg
- File:Li Wo-Shi.jpg
- File:Voa chinese vogel book 21Jan12 300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-hongkong-protest-22jan12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-hongkong-Professor-Kong-dog-22jan12-300.jpg
- File:Voa-chinese-wang-chen-18jan12-300.jpg
- File:Voa chinese tp+ICFET+press+event 20120116 480.JPG
- File:Wu Li-pei cropped.jpg
- File:Peng Ming-min cropped.jpg
- File:Wang Hsiao-po 17july11.jpg
- File:Chang Hung-lin.jpg
- File:Lin Shih-chia.jpg
- File:Johnny C. Chiang.jpg
- File:Hsu Shao-Ping.jpg
These files are not made by VOA employees, as a watermark printing 'AFP' (Agence France-Presse) or 'AP' (Associated Press) is visible on the version from the source website. This means that the files are copyrighted. --Wylve (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Agence France-Presse doesn't understand the concept of copyfraud or how it applies to them. Any claims of ownership on AFPs part need to be very carefully examined, even with a watermark. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- But if an image appears on the VOA site with an AP or AFP watermark, then it seems that VOA acknowledges AP or AFP's ownership of the image. --Ytoyoda (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 07:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Photosedit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from souvenirs.
- File:1-Nuotrauka0675 - Copy.jpg
- File:1-Nuotrauka0674 - Copy.jpg
- File:1-Nuotrauka0672 - Copy.jpg
- File:1-Nuotrauka0667 - Copy.jpg
- File:1-Nuotrauka0671 - Copy.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JiameiSportingGoods (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement of some kind. No evidence of permission. Also out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Marketing advantage.jpg
- File:Advantage of technology.jpg
- File:Advantage of quality.jpg
- File:Advantage of technology equipment.jpg
- File:Advantage of production capacity.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mitchellhagers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mitchellhagers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvios. INeverCry 18:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Halle-michelin-mars.JPG
- File:Halle-michelin-avril.JPG
- File:Amphithe mich pompi.jpg
- File:Ste-Therese-enf-jesus-Metz.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Art files uploaded by Gabfons1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Artisit permission via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Pájaro en su nido.JPG
- File:Entre alambres de Aushwitz.JPG
- File:Homenaje a las víctimas de Genocidios.JPG
- File:Fénix.JPG
- File:"Precolombino 2", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Mujer pondo", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Garza", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Mujer en la ventana", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Precolombino", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Eva y la Culebra", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:Pájaro de Galápagos, escultura de Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:La Ventana, cuadro de Trude Sojka.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by Gabfons1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Retrato de Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:Biblioteca Hans Steinitz.JPG
- File:Trude Sojka.jpg
- File:Hans Steinitz y Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:Trude Sojka en una playa en Punta Blanca, Manabí.jpg
- File:Foto Trude Sojka joven.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep for now. File:Trude Sojka.jpg [ File:Foto Trude Sojka joven.jpg ] was nominated for deletion earlier and kept. At that time it did not appear elsewhere on the internet. Given the subject's history it is unlikely anyone other than a family member m or museum worker (and those sets overlap) would have had access to that photo. A photo of that age can hardly be expected to have exif. It is likely that we are dealing with a copyright holder or representative of the copyright holder. I will make an attempt to contact the museum. Dankarl (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Since user:Gabfons1995 has responded here, however cryptically, I will let him or her speak for him- or herself. Gabfons1995, some explanation would be helpful. If it does not appear I will assume your uploads were unauthorized. If you need help please ask. If you have filed OTRS notification please indicate that here and on the image pages. Thanks, Dankarl (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am sorry I couldn't answer you before. Well, I am Trude Sojka's grand-daughter, from Ecuador. My mother, Anita Steinitz and I are the owners of all her pictures. We decided to publish them when we found out that many people have been surprised there is no article in Wikipedia concerning the Czech painter and sculptor Trude Sojka, a well-known artist in Quito, Ecuador, who died in 2007 and had her house turned into a museum. These pictures are very old; all of them are scanned (except for File:Biblioteca Hans Steinitz.JPG, which I took myself in the museum). That's why, as User:Dankarl said, their resolution is poor, they don't have EXIF, and I have no idea how to put it. Please, tell me what to do in order to keep these photos in Wikipedia. I appreciate your help.
Sincerely, --Gabfons1995 (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, here is a start. Go to Commons:OTRS, read the instructions there, and follow them. Basically what it says is that we need a traceable email that gives permission for these images to be here and indicates that you are the copyright holder and understand the license you are granting. Probably best if it comes from the Museum email address, and has your Mom's name as well as your username. It is very important that you understand the permission that you are granting. It is irrevocable. You are not just putting them on Wikipedia you are letting users download them and use them, including possibly commercial use and derivative works. There are several CC licenses you can choose from but they all allow at least this much. Read about them and think carefully which you want. You still have the moral rights and personality rights to prevent disparging use, though that may be hard to enforce. If you decide you have uploaded more pictures than you want to leave here, mark the rest for speedy deletion-uploader request.
- Then go through and identify the photographers on each photo, with dates if possible. Mark each (except the one you took) OTRS Pending (I think there is a template for this) and copy the explanation you gave here. With any luck that will keep them up until the OTRS email arrives and goes through review. Should that not work and some images are deleted, you can get them undeleted after the OTRS review. Also, if you can put a link to the commons images on the Museum website that will be further proof it's ok; not required but it helps. Sorry this is so complicated but the procedure exists to protect the artist or rights-holder and also the user who downloads and uses the image in good faith.
- Thanks for donating these. You have a remarkable story to tell and I look forward to reading it. Dankarl (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send permission to COM:OTRS FASTILY (TALK) 07:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Art files uploaded by Gabfons1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Artisit permission via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Pájaro en su nido.JPG
- File:Entre alambres de Aushwitz.JPG
- File:Homenaje a las víctimas de Genocidios.JPG
- File:Fénix.JPG
- File:"Precolombino 2", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Mujer pondo", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Garza", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Mujer en la ventana", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Precolombino", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:"Eva y la Culebra", Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:Pájaro de Galápagos, escultura de Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:La Ventana, cuadro de Trude Sojka.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by Gabfons1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Retrato de Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:Biblioteca Hans Steinitz.JPG
- File:Trude Sojka.jpg
- File:Hans Steinitz y Trude Sojka.JPG
- File:Trude Sojka en una playa en Punta Blanca, Manabí.jpg
- File:Foto Trude Sojka joven.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep for now. File:Trude Sojka.jpg [ File:Foto Trude Sojka joven.jpg ] was nominated for deletion earlier and kept. At that time it did not appear elsewhere on the internet. Given the subject's history it is unlikely anyone other than a family member m or museum worker (and those sets overlap) would have had access to that photo. A photo of that age can hardly be expected to have exif. It is likely that we are dealing with a copyright holder or representative of the copyright holder. I will make an attempt to contact the museum. Dankarl (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Since user:Gabfons1995 has responded here, however cryptically, I will let him or her speak for him- or herself. Gabfons1995, some explanation would be helpful. If it does not appear I will assume your uploads were unauthorized. If you need help please ask. If you have filed OTRS notification please indicate that here and on the image pages. Thanks, Dankarl (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am sorry I couldn't answer you before. Well, I am Trude Sojka's grand-daughter, from Ecuador. My mother, Anita Steinitz and I are the owners of all her pictures. We decided to publish them when we found out that many people have been surprised there is no article in Wikipedia concerning the Czech painter and sculptor Trude Sojka, a well-known artist in Quito, Ecuador, who died in 2007 and had her house turned into a museum. These pictures are very old; all of them are scanned (except for File:Biblioteca Hans Steinitz.JPG, which I took myself in the museum). That's why, as User:Dankarl said, their resolution is poor, they don't have EXIF, and I have no idea how to put it. Please, tell me what to do in order to keep these photos in Wikipedia. I appreciate your help.
Sincerely, --Gabfons1995 (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, here is a start. Go to Commons:OTRS, read the instructions there, and follow them. Basically what it says is that we need a traceable email that gives permission for these images to be here and indicates that you are the copyright holder and understand the license you are granting. Probably best if it comes from the Museum email address, and has your Mom's name as well as your username. It is very important that you understand the permission that you are granting. It is irrevocable. You are not just putting them on Wikipedia you are letting users download them and use them, including possibly commercial use and derivative works. There are several CC licenses you can choose from but they all allow at least this much. Read about them and think carefully which you want. You still have the moral rights and personality rights to prevent disparging use, though that may be hard to enforce. If you decide you have uploaded more pictures than you want to leave here, mark the rest for speedy deletion-uploader request.
- Then go through and identify the photographers on each photo, with dates if possible. Mark each (except the one you took) OTRS Pending (I think there is a template for this) and copy the explanation you gave here. With any luck that will keep them up until the OTRS email arrives and goes through review. Should that not work and some images are deleted, you can get them undeleted after the OTRS review. Also, if you can put a link to the commons images on the Museum website that will be further proof it's ok; not required but it helps. Sorry this is so complicated but the procedure exists to protect the artist or rights-holder and also the user who downloads and uses the image in good faith.
- Thanks for donating these. You have a remarkable story to tell and I look forward to reading it. Dankarl (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send permission to COM:OTRS FASTILY (TALK) 07:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Dhaka University Film Society.jpg
- File:Cultural programme.jpg
- File:Mujibur Rahman at Lalitkala Academy.png
- File:Office.Abdul Kadir Mollah City College.jpg
- File:Mermaid Sculpture in Nuhash Palli.jpg
- File:Nuhash Palli.jpg
- File:Alokdia high School.jpg
- File:School Bhaban.jpg
- File:Alokdia High School Assembly.jpg
- File:Chapri Public High School.jpg
- File:Madhupur College.jpg
- File:Madhupur Shahid Smrity High School.jpg
- File:Madhupur Shahid Smrity High School 2.jpg
- File:Madhupur Shahid Smrity Higher Secondary School Hostel.jpg
- File:Madhupur Shahid Smrity Higher Secondary School Bhaban.jpg
- File:Madhupur Shahid Smrity Higher Secondary School.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saoriemoloveraw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Madero plaza.jpg
- File:Ciudadmadero.jpg
- File:Playa miramar puesta de sol.jpg
- File:Playa miramar.jpg
- File:Tec 3.jpg
- File:Gym tec.jpg
- File:Elefantes del tec.jpg
- File:Tec maderense.jpg
- File:Tec.png
- File:PosgradoITCM8.jpg
- File:Tec madero.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
After today identifying around 10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Flickr-accounts, blogs, news sites etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. As all the other already deleted files (15 + 10 actual copyvios, see also above) the images are mostly related to es:Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Madero (TEC, a technological institute in Mexico).
- File:Centro de Convenciones de Tampico.png
- File:Maderoo.png
- File:Unidad Academica de Geociencias.png
- File:Main street.png
- File:El aula antigua.png
- File:Clases de maestro 2012.png
- File:VEHICULO DEL TEC.png
- File:Itcm viejo.png
Gunnex (talk) 07:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Journey (NGO) VCTC.jpg
- File:Journey (NGO).jpg
- File:World aids day 2011, Celebrations at Male' Capital Island..jpg
_VCTC.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope
- File:Churdji85.jpg
- File:Churdji 56r.jpg
- File:Churdji90.JPG
- File:Churdji 11.JPG
- File:Churdji 9.jpg
- File:Churdji7.jpg
- File:Churdji5.jpg
- File:Churdji6.jpg
Trex2001 (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promotional materials.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Comtempo69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States.
- File:George McDonald Bike Trail.JPG
- File:Capital2CoastTrailAlliaire.jpg
- File:Otter mound preserve sign.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:Prioritaire
[edit]- File:Marie Ndiaye à Paris lors de la parution de son livre.JPG
- File:Marie Ndiaye à Paris.JPG
- File:Marie Ndiaye.JPG
User has a number of deleted uploads, mostly (if not entirely) of the same subject. Two of these three remaining files are credited to one Catherine Hélie, while also being claimed as Own Work by Prioritaire. --Powers (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stereo Field (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
INeverCry 20:02, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moodietears (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 20:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafadeleon1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio. Small sizes, no EXIF. These appear to be professional images, so "own work" claim most likely false.
- File:Eri Carranco.jpg
- File:Premios Lo Nuestro.jpg
- File:Perfil Ericka Carranco.jpg
- File:Ericka Carranco .jpg
- File:Eri Carranco LAB.jpg
INeverCry 20:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 20:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 20:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stacie Rice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
- File:Recently Updated13.jpg
- File:Stacie-rice57594.jpg
- File:Stacie rice 21111.jpg
- File:Stacie rice 2010.jpg
INeverCry 21:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Low quality, no EXIF. "Own work" doubtful.
- File:Lunasea 2010.jpg
- File:Sugizo 2010.jpg
- File:Inoran 2010.jpg
- File:Ryuichi 2005.jpg
- File:Rk2010.jpg
- File:Ryuichi2.jpg
INeverCry 23:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day_-_Depiction_of_The_"Prophet"_Muhammad_by_Napalm_filled_tires.jpg
[edit]
It hurt the religious feeling of Islam Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion. Commons is not censored. If it offends you, don't look at it. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Pls delete it rightnow Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, nagging isn't going to work. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
either a new cartoon war will be start on internet Azizfaisalaziz (talk) 10:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion either. If you don't like war, don't wage it. And again, one request would have been plenty. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy Kept. As no valid reason for deletion within the deletion policy has been provided. --Dferg (talk · meta) 07:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Attacks Islamic Religious Thoughts Kmniyas (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Purely disruptive re-nomination with no new arguments. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Agree with prior analysis given. -- Cirt (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Closed as Keep. INeverCry 18:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
Under "Photographs of identifiable people" section of "Commons:Deletion policy" this image has an unethical objective, i.e., to pervert freedom of expression. This image is unacceptable as it mocks the prophet, whose no real photograph is available till date. Further, the author of this image has no consent to draw this picture from the prophet's heirs (i.e. his descendants, the people of Quraish). Chintu6 (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Per my comment on the IP's nomination below. DLindsley Need something? 18:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Commons:Photographs of identifiable people deals with photographs of identifiable, living people. This is not a photograph, and Muhammad is not alive. He died nearly 1200 years before the creation of the earliest surviving camera photograph and 1378 years before this drawing was created. None of your other points have any basis in Commons' policy or applicable laws or bring up anything that wasn't already addressed in the numerous deletion discussions that you were told to read before starting yet another round of this. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Speedily kept as no valid reason within Commons policy has been advanced. NPOV, Verifiability and OR do not apply to Commons; "unethical, mischievous and provocative" are opinions not based in policy and so irrelevant here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
This image just kills Wikipedia's "neutral point of view". In addition it lacks "verifiability" and has "no original research" 14.139.234.86 18:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Please understand that Commons is not Wikipedia, which means that here at Commons, we don't have to rely on Wikipedia rules such as the rules you mentioned, which are "neutral point of view" and "no original research". I'm also going for a Keep vote per the above arguments in the archived debates. DLindsley Need something? 18:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, because whoever our anonymous friend one four dot one three nine dot two three four dot eight six is, he or she failed to cite any relevant Commons policies, and there is already an ongoing deletion discussion. As the very first sentence of Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view states, "Commons is not Wikipedia, and files uploaded here do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view and No original research requirements imposed by many of the Wikipedia sites." At this point, repeated deletion nominations of the same file without bringing up any new, relevant arguments is entirely unhelpful, and piling on multiple concurrent deletion discussions is particularly disruptive. Speedy non-admin closure, because there is plenty of precedent here as well as another open discussion. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
These images lack neutral point of view, verifiability and original research besides being unethical, mischievous and provocative (see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons) Chintu6 (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Speedily kept as no valid reason within Commons policy has been advanced. NPOV, Verifiability and OR do not apply to Commons; "unethical, mischievous and provocative" are opinions not based in policy and so irrelevant here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:D: Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack. Also for COM:SCOPE as it can not be used for education. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 02:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept, Withdrawn by nominator (me)
Scanned poem by de:Rudolf Herzog (d. 1943). Jergen (talk) 12:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Poem was removed, but there is no possible use of a picture showing a scanned poem without its text. --Jergen (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Jergen, es geht darum, darzustellen, wie so ein Heft grundsätzlich ausgesehen hat. Da kann sich dann der Betrachter schon einmal einen Eindruck machen. Das ganze ist ja auch kein "Bild" sondern die Titelseite eines Heftes. Ansonsten müssen wir noch Jahrzehnte warten, bis wir den Leuten überhaupt was zeigen können. Und das kann es doch auch nicht sein. Das ist übrigens auch einer der Gründe, warum ich in diesem Bereich Pfadfinder/Jugendbewegung & Co in der WP nicht tätig bin. Es macht keinen Sinn, kiloweise Text ohne Bilder zu schreiben. Das muß dann wohl eine andere Generation machen. Jedenfalls ist vieles, was da steht ziemlich ungenau und teils nicht richtig. Mediatus (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete I agree that there appears to be little use for a poem that has been deliberately made unreadable, but Google did a bad job of the comment from Mediatus, so I will leave this to our German speaking colleagues. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- I want to show our scouts as one of the most important Scouting magazines of this times looked visually. It's not about the poem, it's all about visualization! Otherwise, we can not present German magazines of the 1910s and 1920s in Wikipedia – for legal reasons. Mediatus (talk) 13:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for 2D works in the U.K. Text is subject to copyright. Wknight94 talk 16:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- not a work of "artistic craftsmanship" Text is permanently and publicly displayed and does not fall under the same laws as 2d art Oxyman (talk) 15:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: This is 3D. Yann (talk) 08:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Reopen DR - text is clearly copyrightable. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Not commenting on the merits, but the admin considering this request has not been asked to reconsider, per COM:DEL#Appeal. It would seem that this renomination is therefore premature. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- We need to be consistent. We decided that coins are 3D in copyright issues, where there is much less 3D than here. Yann (talk) 11:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete The whole 2D-3D question relates only to {{PD-Art}} -- it is shorthand for the Bridgeman vs Corel decision, which was about old master paintings. It, and {{PD-Art}}, have no application to text, which is always covered by copyright except in the seven countries that allow it under FOP.
Also, please remember that {{PD-Art}}, and the 2D-3D question relates to the photograph's copyright. To apply PD-Art, the underlying work must be PD. There is no question that we have a CC-BY-SA license to the photograph here -- the problem is that the work that has been photographed is not PD. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with this, but here, it would be PD because of FOP if the work is 3D. So 3D or not 3D? Yann (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting question -- subtle. The 3D/2D distinction is one of our shorthands. UK FOP allows "(a) buildings, and (b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship...." Therefore, I think there are two questions:
- (1) Does the fact that it was clearly a literary work before it was anything else -- the person typesetting the plaque must have worked from a text -- eliminate all other issues? If so, it must be deleted.
- (2) Is it a work of artistic craftsmanship, as defined in Section 4? A work of artistic craftsmanship is not
- "Section 4(1)(a) a graphic work, photograph, sculpture or collage, irrespective of artistic quality, (b)a work of architecture being a building or a model for a building..." because they are separately called out in section 4.
- "Graphic work"
- "Section 4(2)(a) includes any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, and (b)any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work;
- This is presumably a casting. It seems to me similar to all of "engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut". The case law cited at Commons:Freedom of panorama#United_Kingdom suggests that there must be some creativity in the work if it is going to be classed as "artistic craftsmanship" -- this is a routine cast plaque. The type molds used for the letters might well have been set by computer. Not much craftsmanship in it.
- I note, with a chuckle, that we are arguing the opposite sides of craftsmanship/originality on Phare de Berck. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- (2) Is it a work of artistic craftsmanship, as defined in Section 4? A work of artistic craftsmanship is not
- Delete {{FoP-UK}} does as far as I know only apply to artistic works. If the stone is an artistic work (of the kind covered by {{FoP-UK}}), then the engraver can't sue you for copyright infringement (see COM:L#Typographic copyright), and then the one who drew the coat of arms can't sue you either. However, this item does not only have artistic aspects, but also literary aspects. I don't see how {{FoP-UK}} would overcome the literary aspects, so I assume that the one who wrote the text can sue you for copyright infringement. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted by Fastily. Yann (talk) 05:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
