Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/03/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect transfer to Commons (only smaller preview version!). Leyo 13:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've uploaded now the correct version. --Holder (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Corrected by uploader. Leyo 15:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
copyright violation −ebraminiotalk 14:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyright violation. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 14:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Full resulotion file here: Map_Devolution2.png. This was a mistaken upload. Xavax (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Mistake by uploader. Leyo 17:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Low quality, replaced by File:Glycoluril.svg. Leyo 18:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- It was a temporarly file, IMHO speedy deletion--Fix 1998 (talk) 18:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Ed (Edgar181) 01:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Highly stylised logo that is certainly subject to copyright and not composed solely of simple geometric shapes. Copyright Marks & Spencer. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep Not simple geometric shapes but I still think it is just text {{PD-textlogo}}. --MGA73 (talk) 17:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Per MGA73. Leyo 23:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Highly stylised logo that is certainly subject to copyright and not composed solely of simple geometric shapes. Copyright Marks & Spencer. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Obvious keep Fonts and typefaces come in every shape and style you can imagine. Logos based essentially on type, including variations and ornamentation, are not copyrightable. There's barely anything to say about this particular type, other than it's "not Arial". Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 19:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I doubt that Marks & Spencer would agree. It is a registered trademark here: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/domestic?domesticnum=1320156 Philafrenzy (talk) 19:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Trademark ≠ copyright. Most logos uploaded here are trademarks, and we have a {{Trademarked}} tag for them. But that's a completely separate issue from copyright. Trademark registration only restricts the use of the same trademark to promote goods and services similar to those registered. To delete this file, we need a proof that the copyright was registered. Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 21:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- There is no facility to register copyright in the UK, it just is or is not copyright. I am not trying to get it deleted, it just seemed an obvious breach of copyright to me. I think something can be copyright even if it is text if it includes a distinctive combination of words, typeface and colours, but perhaps I am wrong. Philafrenzy (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Trademark ≠ copyright. Most logos uploaded here are trademarks, and we have a {{Trademarked}} tag for them. But that's a completely separate issue from copyright. Trademark registration only restricts the use of the same trademark to promote goods and services similar to those registered. To delete this file, we need a proof that the copyright was registered. Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 21:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I doubt that Marks & Spencer would agree. It is a registered trademark here: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/domestic?domesticnum=1320156 Philafrenzy (talk) 19:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}}. Leyo 23:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced atom labels. Awkward mix of transparent and white backgrounds in different locations. Replaced by File:Kairine.png. Leyo 09:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Ed (Edgar181) 21:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
BadJPG, not used anywhere, alternatives in Category:Sucrose. Leyo 17:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Ed (Edgar181) 21:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
BadJPG, not used anywhere, alternatives in Category:Sucralose. Leyo 17:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Ed (Edgar181) 21:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: far out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal image/avatar not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: far out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope, self-promotional George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 10:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
agreed :p Immeëmosol (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook or myspace George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal image not in use by any of the projects. I highly doubt "bathrobe cabal" will be something useful for anyone besides the uploader as well. – Adrignola talk 01:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal user image not in use by any of the projects and not of use for other purposes. – Adrignola talk 01:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Still in use in userpage George Chernilevsky talk 10:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Appears to contain a copyright logo. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Freedom of Panoarama in the UK. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Freedom of Panoarama in the UK.--Chandres (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal user page image not in use by any of the projects. No future use for it for anyone else either. – Adrignola talk 01:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Additionally, lacks source and license. – Adrignola talk 01:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Stated to be for user page only. – Adrignola talk 01:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Appears to be professional photograph and no indication of permission of photographer as well (also unlikely to be the uploader as stated). – Adrignola talk 01:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Claimed to be a personal image; not in use by any of the projects. Also appears to be advertising for bongo-papercraft.net. – Adrignola talk 01:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, blatant advertisement only George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Additionally, is an image of text which, even if educational, is excluded content. – Adrignola talk 02:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: far out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Unusable poor quality too George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Go ahead and delete this one. I don't really need to have my pic posted on my page. Thanks! Brynn (talk!) 20:20, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom and Uploader agreed George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
It was used on my User page on wikipedia but Toddst1 deleted the infobox. I shold probably delete this now. Cjsnow1 (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook or Twitter George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
better quality here: File:ExtraitDuVocabulaire.JPG Od1n (talk) 02:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Was tagged as user page image but unlikely to be uploader's. More pertinent is the fact that image lacks permission and is likely a copyright violation. – Adrignola talk 02:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom: copyvio. George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. Wikimedia is not a Facebook George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Very poor quality. – Adrignola talk 02:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I cry foul on own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 04:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, Tineye finds larger copy linked in a forum post from 2007, although the image itself (hosted at imageshack) doesn't appear to be accessible anymore. Lupo 11:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal photo with no educational value. -mattbuck (Talk) 04:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
No educational use, out of project scope Martin H. (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wknight94 talk 23:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Roblox avatars are believed to be non-free images 2601:40:C003:9550:D006:44E0:3DDF:A573 14:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 16:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Note the name in the description and the uploader's username to note that subject is the uploader. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 16:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Portrayal of subject precludes use of image as an illustration of Poker. – Adrignola talk 21:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. No permission shown for stated author who is different from the uploader. Licensing tag states copyright has expired on image but that is doubtful given the subject depicted. – Adrignola talk 21:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Depiction of subject precludes use as an illustration of bowling. – Adrignola talk 21:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Stated to be a personal photo but not in use by any of the projects. Searching for subject notability only results in Facebook/LinkedIn hits. Therefore this appears to be out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- The image was onece used on sv:Användare:vakense, but that user has since left the project. // Sertion 18:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 21:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: far out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 23:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 12:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Fan Art guerreritoboy (talk) 00:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Although freely licensed on Flickr, this image is a derivative work of the drawing it photographs, and there is no evidence or reason provided to believe the original work is freely licensed. Courcelles (talk) 00:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Author is from Sweden, where freedom of panorama exists (no info where this was taken, besides being in public), but the art is very likely based on a non-free photo: [1]. Jujutacular talk 01:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete derivative work of copyrighted work. Hekerui (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Comet Tuttle (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 00:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo only in use in Audra Williams gallery. Uploader's at en.wiki points to which was deleted. Despite being used in a gallery, "an otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page" Same rationale applies to File:Audra Williams (cropped).jpg. – Adrignola talk 00:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo only in use in Audra Williams gallery. Uploader's at en.wiki points to which was deleted. Despite being used in a gallery, "an otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page" Same rationale applies to File:Audra Williams.jpg. – Adrignola talk 00:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to contain a copyright logo. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Appears to contain a copyright logo. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Appears to contain a copyright logo. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It is just a {{PD-textlogo}}. --MGA73 (talk) 11:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete It is more than a text logo. The circles behind the letters TSB, the background to the word bank, the typeface chosen and the way the two lines are arranged lifts it beyond simple text. This is why the article on the TSB uses a fair use rationale for the logo it uses in the info panel (which is not this logo). Its use is also unnecessary as it duplicates the logo at the top of the article page and it does not add any information relevant to the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- The template says "simple geometric shapes and/or text". You can not have the copyright for 3 circles and you can not have copyright for a few simple letters. --MGA73 (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Chester is in the UK. Its a brickwall, obviously out in public space. Freedom of Panorama should apply. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Simple text, Also FOP applicable --Kiran Gopi (talk) 17:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is a registered trademark number 1289447 registered with the UK Intellectual Property Office. See here: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/domestic?domesticnum=1289447 Philafrenzy (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Copyright and trademark are 2 different things. --MGA73 (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: It is a copyrighted logo, also a DW of the sculpture, but FOP applies. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Appears to contain a copyright logo. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Appears to contain a copyright logo. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
The original of possibly taken from www.egyptiancabinet.gov.eg (the site is down because of the events in Egypt). Google show us low resolution from the full version her. I doubt that new user uploaded photo without EXIF of a person connected to major events in the world news today. ~ Geagea (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Pretty straight forward here. If the user insists it is theirs, they can submit an OTRS ticket. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Facebook is not an acceptable source for Commons Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
This is not an original work but a photographed campaign poster and the original photographer has not agreed to a free license. Hekerui (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment Certainly a derivative work. Is this allowed by FOP law in Egypt? -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:29, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept Note that this is not the same image as the file of the same name that I deleted in March 2011. Infrogmation is correct -- Egyptian FOP is very broad, including 2D works. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:49, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Probably in scope: en:Boyce Watkins -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good catch. I've added it to the Wikipedia article. This nomination can be closed. – Adrignola talk 13:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: added cats Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:18, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm the uploader. It is an old image and I don't use it anymore. I thought it is funny .. years ago. Feel free to delete it. Sorry for wasting your time. --Vejvančický (talk) 22:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- No apologies are necessary. It's just procedural and one of many maintenance tasks that take time that countless volunteers dedicate each day at Commons. – Adrignola talk 23:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 02:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Seems a bit like an advertisement due to the link to a website for the record label. To be more clear - image is a bit out of scope here due to it "Advertising or self-promotion" like appearance. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Speculative image of an aircraft, now proven to be very inaccurate. It serves no encyclopedic purpose and is not in use in any article. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
No primary source, single-file user account at Flickr, probably Flickrwashing Denniss (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- The original version of this file is available in this Link
This is a Wikipedia link, I hope this file has all the copyright to publish here --Vishalissac (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- I used to upload via Flicker because I first tried to upload it via wiki projects, etc.. but it didn't work out for some reasons. So I used the Flickr to upload this Image for the Identification of that actor. --Vishalissac (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: 6 March 2011 by Dodo, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Low resolution duplicate of File:Hau. Interiors of the Winter Palace. The Alexander Hall. 1861.jpg; no source. Art-top (talk) 08:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:LibyanCivilWar.jpg + really poor quality of work of transformation of JPG in SVG. + probable use of a "blank" map from a non free place(can be found : http://www.geographicguide.net/africa/libya.htm and seems to be an extraction from a Magellan Geographix map, and I can found that the small density map in the left bottom corner is published by World Trade Press [2] ), Loreleil (talk) 09:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
logo, not free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erdrokan (talk • contribs)
- Keep Too simple for copyright eligibility, should be tagged with {{PD-textlogo}}. Jujutacular talk 20:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
logo copyright ZioNicco (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple for copyright eligibility, should be tagged with {{PD-textlogo}}. Jujutacular talk 20:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: 22:08, 7 March 2011 by Túrelio because it is an exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:Logo INA ASSITALIA.jpg, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It was not created by 20minutos.es, see EXIF: "ESPECIALES DE ROCIO JURADO.- SALSA ROSA.- TELE 5.- TELEVISION.- MADRID" Trycatch (talk) 12:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Promotional photo for w:Sin tetas no hay paraíso, clearly it was not created by 20minutos.es. See EXIF: "SIN TETAS NO HAY PARAISO.- MIGUEL ANGEL SILVESTRE.- SERIES DE FICCION.- TELEVISION" Trycatch (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
The EXIF of this file gives credit to EFE/Víctor Lerena. This means this is not 20minutos content but third-party content. The Creative Commons license not applies per http://www.20minutos.es/especial/corporativo/creative-commons/... even if the again 20minutos made a mistake with the image caption and copyright credit. Martin H. (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I can't find this photo on 20minutos.es. It looks promotional, so it's unlikely that the photo was created by 20minutos.es staff. Trycatch (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Advertising: used in spam articles on enwiki, not under a free-content license, no fair-use on Commons. Acroterion (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
It's ok to delete this file, it's not used anymore (the page it was on has been deleted.
Displeasedron (talk) 09:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
On the source page isnt written entered license. (i didnt find it) Palu (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: in fact, source page has explicit (C) notice. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Clearly not in the public domain, author died in 1962 and the current license tag is not capable of addressing this. Closedmouth (talk) 14:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
It's too large Mbruno20 (talk) 15:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Being too large is not an acceptable reason for deletion. Files up to 100 MB in size are allowed. – Adrignola talk 16:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Who's the author and copyright holder? ~ Kobac (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
wax sculpture is copyrighted (like a statue), no freedom of panorama in Estonia Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
I uploaded this file, but the official Super Kamiokande Superviser asked me to delete it. Je.argy (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This image is not owned by J. ARGYRIADES but by Kamioka Observatory. See Super-Kamiokande photo gallery and Conditions for the usage. Obayashi.yoshihisa (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
More likely to be advertisement then own work. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects, despite usage showing its use by a file of the same name at en.wikipedia (which was deleted). Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
This unused image could be any number of LDS temples. The User uploaded this image 10 months ago no information as to which temple it is and has made no other Contribs since. What information provided would suggest it was the Taiwan temple, but it looks nothing like that temple. It look like one of the large number of "Small" temple in the LDS church, so there isn't any way to know, so this image is unusable. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 17:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: It's a rather nice photo (if someone removed the watermark), so it could easily be used to illustrate the general look of such temples. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Undated photograph is likely still to be under copyright. Licence probably wrong. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Highly stylised logo that is certainly still under copyright. It is not composed only of simple geometric shapes. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD text logo Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
The last deletion request ended in "keep" several months before Future v. Edge. See COM:TOO United Kingdom, this is most likely protected under UK law GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping @Jameslwoodward: as closer of the previous discussion. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Delete The logo is the signature of William Adlington Barrow Cadbury which was adopted in 1921. The signature almost certainly has a copyright, see Com:United_Kingdom#Signatures. He died in 1957, so it will have a UK copyright until 1/1/2028. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Highly stylised logo that is certainly subject to copyright and not composed solely of simple geometric shapes. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: pd text logo Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
I doubt very much that this user has the right to release this company logo into the Public Domain -- it may be PD-text logo, but that is not what is claimed. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept - PD-textlogo - Jcb (talk) 10:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
British logo. Looks more complex than en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which is copyrighted in the United Kingdom. Stefan4 (talk) 17:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. INeverCry 20:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete: King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Highly stylised logo that is certainly subject to copyright and not composed solely of simple geometric shapes. Licence appears incorrect. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Highly stylised logo that is certainly subject to copyright and not composed solely of simple geometric shapes. Licence appears incorrect. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: pd text logo Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted AP Stylebook cover. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Information on authors and sources of the individual pictures is missing. Leyo 17:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
derivate work Ralf Roletschek (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
derivative work -- Common Good (talk) 19:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Looks like this is some form of mascot. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
copied from http://panoramanuevaepoca.blogspot.com/2008_03_01_archive.html may be a copyright violation Esteban (talk) 19:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
RUSSIAN COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 20:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment What is the date of the building? Is it so recent? Jeriby (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- 1953 acccording to en:Seven_Sisters_(Moscow). Other photos of the building, like File:Mgu001.JPG, are also requested for deletion for the reason Architecturial work of Lev Rudnev, who died in 1956 ([1]). There is no FOP in Russia ([2]), and Russian law is applied retroactively to Soviet works ([3]). Should be in category "Undelete in 2027/31". --BIL (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- "Commons:Project scope#File in use on Commons only:"by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed." It's in Category:User page images---- Chucky 23:03Z6Mar2011 23:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use: A media file which is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons". Before you added it to your user page, that would have applied to the file as I interpret the policy. Small numbers of images for use on a user page are allowed. But if they're not used on a user page or even any page and they're not adding to the educational mission of Commons based on their content, then going through the maintenance category Category:User page images as I have, I will nominate them for deletion as Template:Userpageimage suggests. – Adrignola talk 23:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- It was for use on my user page. I forgot about it. Now it is in use on my user page. I moved the template you mentioned up to above the description template. Also, I updated the photo with my phone and suggested it be moved to "File:Charles Marean, Jr" because today is not aug 31 2007. I suppose educational mission would include photos of places like the royal society building or the new york stock exchange building and so on and so forth even if not used anywhere but wikimedia commons because that would be making the free photos available and easier to find than elsewhere.---- Chucky 00:59Z7Mar2011 00:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use: A media file which is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons". Before you added it to your user page, that would have applied to the file as I interpret the policy. Small numbers of images for use on a user page are allowed. But if they're not used on a user page or even any page and they're not adding to the educational mission of Commons based on their content, then going through the maintenance category Category:User page images as I have, I will nominate them for deletion as Template:Userpageimage suggests. – Adrignola talk 23:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. It was used at this userpage previously. It's useless now.--Sevela.p 21:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Copyright Eugene Jose Franz Lucker, date of death 1943. Not free until 2014. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
This appears to be more artwork than a simple photograph; the author (w: David Unaipon) died in 1967; not free until 2034 Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- How could the person depicted at the same time be the creator of the photograph? He is clearly not the author. No reason to delete the image, in my opinion. --Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: It appears to me to be a very characteristic photograph from the time. Since it was published in 1924 (prior to 1/1/1955) it is PD in Australia Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
courtesy photo from the German Federal Ministry of Defence, not created by ISAF and not validly licensed under Creative Commons Martin H. (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- ain't it safe to assume that it was published on flickr by ISAF staff in accordance with the German Federal Ministry of Defence? I assume: ISAF asked for permission to post the pic under the given license and German Federal Ministry of Defence was entirely informed about the terms of that license. Courtesy of just refers to the original source/author of this pic.--TUBS
21:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: ISAF images on Flickr are NC Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 22:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of the map in the picture Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
possibly copyvio - FC logos usually are non-free Postoronniy-13 (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
UAE COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 09:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: UAE has no Freedom of Panorama for completed buildings. James F. (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
UAE COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 09:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: UAE has no Freedom of Panorama for completed buildings. James F. (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
UAE COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 10:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: UAE has no Freedom of Panorama for completed buildings. James F. (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
UAE COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 10:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: UAE has no Freedom of Panorama for completed buildings. James F. (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
UAE COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 15:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: UAE has no Freedom of Panorama for completed buildings, but this is not yet complete. James F. (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. Rumlin (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Do we have a date for this work? Perhaps it is PD-Old? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- No, it was created in 1999 by sculptors Levon Tokmajyan and Vahe Tokmajyan [3]. Both are still living. Trycatch (talk) 00:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is duplicated Ed62624 (talk) 23:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Duplicated Ed62624 (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: 13:09, 7 March 2011 by ABF, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Not notable Gothika (talk) 12:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep In use on user page. --Simonxag (talk) 22:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, uploaders only contribution on en.wikipedia was "band spam" about a non-notable band on his userpage. Wikipedia is not myspace, nominated the image for deletion, file will be orphaned. --Martin H. (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Still in use. Yann (talk) 16:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, not in use anymore. --Martin H. (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Per nom: out of project scope. -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Want to use a differrent file for this. Thank you. Serband (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: add {{Rename}} to the file and a Filemover will move it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Would like to stop using this picture for wikimedia. Serband (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept. The license which you gave may not be revoked. It is a good photo and I see no reason why we should delete it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Please remove this picture! Serband (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Closed early for reasons above. Once is fine, twice is OK, third time is close to vandalism. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
BELGIAN COPYRIGHT LAW $UCK$! 84.61.155.241 10:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Indeed it does. But this one is already a cropped picture. Delete the original uncropped version. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep As previously said, the new version makes a case of de minimis. And it's very easy to hide behind an IP address, mister "dura lex", with your new deletion "reasons"... Jeriby (talk) 03:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep This picture was given by special permission by the heirs of Mr Andre Waterkyen it is a family picture. How (or to which Wiki-Commons body) can I provide their authorization ? Olnnu March 12th 2011. 18:30 GMT +2
- You can provide this by sending a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (or permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org if you want to provide it in french). Jeriby (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: no valid deletion reason specified Jcb (talk) 10:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
A work of the California government, no the U. S. government—a photo of a judge—: is it public domain? The pages linked from Template:PD-CAGov aren't very clear on this. —innotata 23:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete We don't have any proof that the work was created by an employee of the State of California. It can be easily created by a third-party photographer. Trycatch (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
