Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
31 October 2024
2 November 2024
Deletion requests on 1 November 2024

November 1

[edit]

File:Stephen Petersen's Greenland Flag Proposal (1974).svg

[edit]

duplicate of File:3rd Proposal.svg Feitidede (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashin Munindābhivaṃsa.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ninjastrikers as Speedy (Nonderivative) - Contradicts VOA license template. Which is correct? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This screenshot is from a VOA video which shot at the funeral of the monk. The video includes a picture of the monk and this screenshot comes from it. COM:DM? Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 06:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
VOA allows their videos or photos to be used and marked under the public domain if you credit them respectfully. KhantWiki (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
VOA re-shoot the photo of the monk. That photo is not their work and they can't release it under PD. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 10:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Upon your claims, I visited the source in my description and found that there's a VOA watermark, credits which it claims, right beside the photo, doesn't that mean they created it and they can allow it to be released under public domain? As far as you dive deeper into the source and see what's actually there, Voice of America (Burmese) credit to themselves only and not others. If they don't create the work they won't have to put the watermark there or they would put a credit to who created the work. KhantWiki (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At 0:37 of video, there was the picture of the monk which is not the work of VOA. Even VOA created the whole video, that picture is the work of someone and probably copyrighted. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 11:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have previewed the source again, that 37 seconds of the video you're talking about is the term "အရှင် ပညာစာရ ကြခတ်ဝိုင်း" (Ashin Pannasara Kyauk Taw Win) actually refers to a religious title and location associated with a Buddhist monk, not to any statement about VOA ownership or copyright status. It could also means that the photographer of the photo, granted access for permission of usage to Voice of America (Burmese) to use it on the video, which they owns now. KhantWiki (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ပြောတာ သဘောမပေါက်ဘူးထင်တယ်။ ဗီဒီယိုထဲမှာ ဘုန်းကြီး ဓာတ်ပုံကို ဗီအိုအေ က ရိုက်ထားတယ်။ မူရင်း ဘုန်းကြီး ဓာတ်ပုံမှာ မူပိုင်ခွင့် အခြေအနေမသိရဘူး။ ဗီအိုအေက ပြန်ရိုက်တဲ့ ဗီဒီယိုထဲမှာ ပါနေတာနဲ့ အဲဒီဓာတ်ပုံကို သူတို့ မပိုင်သွားဘူး။ အဲဒါကို derivative work လို့ခေါ်တယ်။ ဓာတ်ပုံကို ဓာတ်ပုံ/ဗီဒီယိုပြန်ရိုက်လိုက်တာနဲ့ ပြန်ရိုက်လိုက်တဲ့သူက မူရင်းဓာတ်ပုံရဲ့ မူပိုင်ခွင့် အခွင့်အရေးကို ပိုင်မသွားဘူး။ မူလဓာတ်ပုံဆရာမှာပဲ မူပိုင်ခွင့် ရှိနေတယ်။ ခုတင်ထားတဲ့ ပုံသည်လည်း ဗီဒီယိုထဲမှာ ပါနေတဲ့၊ VOA က မပိုင်တဲ့ ဓာတ်ပုံတစ်ပုံဖြစ်နေလို့ ပြောနေတာ။ Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 12:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
သဘော‌ပေါက်ပါတယ် ဒါပေးမဲ့ အဲ့ဒီ ရိုက်ထားတဲ့ပုံရဲ photographer က VOA Burmese ကို permission အပြည့်ပေးထားလို VOA က photographer ရဲ credit ကိုမထည့်တာ။ photographer က သူ့တို့ရဲပုံကိုပေးသုံးရင် VOA မှာသုံးခွင့် permission ရရင် public domain ထဲ့ရောက်ပါတယ်။ (I understand what you're trying to say, but, the photographer who captured the photo could have given permission to VOA Burmese, that's why they didn't put the credit of the photographer next to the photo. If they have given the permission, VOA Burmese can upload the picture under the PD.) KhantWiki (talk) 12:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:أنثى بوكافر.jpg

[edit]

غلاف كتاب له حقوق  Mohammed Qays  🗣 06:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

أنا أعد مقالة عن الكاتب نفسه وأعطاني كامل الحق لنشر هذا الغلاف وجميع أغلفة كتبه الأخرى تحت قانون المشاع بويكيبيديا، وبالتالي فلا أرى داعيا لحذف الصورة من هذه الناحية، ولكم واسع النظر FLABISO (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FLABISO:

العربية: اقترح على حضرتك تبعت اثبات الاذن لفريق COM:VRT
English: i suggest sending the premssion proof to COM:VRT team

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.54.17.205 (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:222Simplajversajxojporkomencantoj.jpg

[edit]

Book cover. There's no proof if author, publisher or copyright holder explicitly allows it (e.g., through a Creative Commons license or public domain dedication). –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 07:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Diskutindas ĉu ĉi tie eblas apliki "PD-simple". Sed mi almenaŭ pledas pri apliko de sama politiko en la komunejo por ĉiu kovrilbildo: Ĉu vere oni bezonas VRTS-tikedon por ĉiu kovrilbildo en la komunejo?? Ekzemple file:10th Anniversary Cover Recipes Remembered.jpg estas kovrilbildo de libro el 2021 - ĉu ĝin kaj pli-malpli ĉiun enhavon el Category:Front covers of books kaj Category:Book covers ankaŭ necesas buĉi, se mankas aparta VRTS-tikedo? - file:10th Anniversary Cover Recipes Remembered.jpg evidente ne havas VRTS-tikedon. ThomasPusch (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:B29I8403.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo and the other photos by this uploader might be own work. The photos have EXIF data and the uploader is likely acquainted or associated with the subject (or is the depicted subject) judging by the uploader's username (RAPiS DX). There is a section called "株式会社RAPiS" on the subject's Ja Wiki article[1] which also mentions the letters "DX", so the uploader's username is in that article and it looks like RAPiS is the name of the subject's company[2]. A similar, but different, photo is also used as the profile picture of the subject's Instagram[3]. So, possibly a work for hire for advertisement purposes, or upload by a company representative, or upload by the subject of the photo. Either way, the images might be out of scope as advertising in nature, and the company potentially lacking encyclopedic notability (the article on the subject has been nominated for deletion on Ja Wiki[4]). Nakonana (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:B29I84031.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:安徒生童话邮票.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Книжкова шафа.jpg

[edit]

And also

Ukrainian copyright law does not contain a general exception for reproductions of works in public places. Museum exposition with author's works. File is a derivative work and sources or permission of the original works are not given. Uploader did not create this paitings. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Так а чиї це роботи?--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 15:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Не знаю. Але не знаю ніякої художниці Регіни Костюк. І дядько Гугль теж не знає. І дядько Фейсбук не знає. У племінника ТікТока я не питав. Отже, точно не авторки світлини. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Знайшов — авторка полотен художниця Тетяна Балбус! Відкриття персональної виставки у музеї Юліуша Словацького відбулося 19 вересня 2024 року. Дозволу від Тетяни Балбус нема, тож це порушення авторських прав. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:AI Video Impersonating Matthew Metro to Claim Abuse by Tim Walz.webm

[edit]

AI created video. Taken from web with unknown author. Normally this would be COM:NETCOPYVIO but I am not certain if AI created videos are copyrighted. MKFI (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was an AI-generated video produced by the Russians for election interference in the U.S.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tim-walz-false-claims-russian-disinformation-groups/
The Russians laundered the AI video through Twitter user Alphafox78.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html Greatbrookcondor (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidsjr logo final (5658576277).jpg

[edit]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Klenze-Logo.gif

[edit]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Knight Soul of the Community 2009 logo - Flickr - Knight Foundation.jpg

[edit]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Knok Studio logo - Seattle Nonprofit Film Charity Studio - Enumclaw, Oct 8 2016.png

[edit]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:KTP Logo-wDate-2013 (8491547857).png

[edit]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:KUASLOGO.png

[edit]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Signaturemcustodia.svg

[edit]

Converted it into svg years ago from an existing file, not own work, a new signature (in svg format) is avaliable from other upload (not by me). Want it deleted for copyright reasons - at the time did not know. A better version of the signature exists in the said other file and there is no reason for this one.

Best regards, Wikisempra Wikisempra (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikisempra: I am failing to understand under what policy-based rationale you are proposing that this file be deleted. In particular, signatures are not generally protected by copyright. Xover (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Signaturemcustodia.svg

[edit]

Not my own work. Wikisempra (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ballondor2017logo.jpg

[edit]

Outside project scope, "FIFA Ballon d'Or 2017" does not exist because the FIFA/Ballon d'Or partnership ended in 2015. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Alyssa Bustamante.jpg

[edit]

No evidence provided, nor precedent established, that Associated Press or Cole County, Missouri released this image under any Creative Commons license. Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:プエルトリコの紋章.png

[edit]

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (variant).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agadir-cityreflection.jpg

[edit]

cropped my picture YounessFakoiallah (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason. But by all means, argue on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boeing 707 "Stratoliner", 3rd 707-121 production airplane, N709PA, later delivered to Pan Am.jpg

[edit]

In user RecycledPixels opinion, PP-US of this image seems suspicious Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boeing 707 "Stratoliner", 3rd 707-121 production airplane, N709PA, later delivered to Pan Am.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyvio. File was uploaded to Commons from Flickr in 2014. The linked Flickr page shows that the image was uploaded to that site in 2010 with an All Rights Reserved copyright tag, and no other history of licensing tags used. Neither the Flickr page nor this page provides a justification of when or where this image was ever published without a proper copyright notice. My attempts to verify the copyright status of this image have failed, and the original uploader, who was a prolific image uploader, has been banned from Commons. RecycledPixels (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alamy also has it PD, though I don't know where they got it. It says UtCon Collection / Alamy Stock Photo. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autostrade con Numerazione.jpg

[edit]

wrong street, non standard, numeration missing; unclear GioviPen GP msg 17:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:142 Hohenems Foto Schadenbauer MWS8332.jpg

[edit]

license washing Mateus2019 (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revvas Giorgos.jpg

[edit]

because thats me i didn't upload it at all it and i know that from the user name (desing_dr) so pls remove it Egeorgegr (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Consuelo (Neus) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. These materials should be maintained as text on a project wiki, not as PDF files.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lamento mi error. Soy una persona mayor. Pedí ayuda para saber como editar pero la verdad es que la respuesta fue muy confusa para mí. Si fuesen tan amables de indicarme qué debo hacer para que se publiquen esos artículos. Muchas gracias Consuelo (Neus) (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lo siento, señora, ninguna posibilidad. Borrar186.175.135.72 23:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by ACoolWikiEditor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are sourced to a NRHP nomination form. These forms are filled out locally, not by federal government employees, so the {{PD-USGov}} license is not applicable.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "PD-US-1978-89" in the US you still were required to have a copyright notice and then you had 5 years to register for that copyright. None of the published NRHP nomination forms have a copyright notice and they never registered for a copyright. --RAN (talk) 01:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Rotaract logos

[edit]

While certain logos look simple enough to be considered a simple shape (e.g. Rotaract old black logo.jpg), several others are way above the threshold of originality and have no permissions from Rotaract.

Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i think some of them are allowed (or can be) for {{Pd-logo}}: like File:Rotaract old black logo.jpg and File:Rotaract old red logo.jpg. GioviPen GP msg 20:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also File:Rotaract France logo.png probably? it contain the standard new logo and a self uploaded self made work; or just a france-shaped border so under threshold. idk GioviPen GP msg 20:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the ones I mentioned (too basic) GioviPen GP msg 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/11/01&oldid=966540485"