User talk:Yarl/archive 5

Bug in Vicuna?

Hello, could you please assist in here? Thank you, --Vojtech.dostal (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer in there, could you please look on the follow-up question of Mr Reischig? Sincerely --Vojtech.dostal (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Yarl, it has been three weeks and nothing has changed; can you please specify if you plan to work on this? We are in an advanced stage of upload preparation and would like to complete the project soon. Thank you very much for information and for your good work on Vicuna, --Vojtech.dostal (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

@Vojtech.dostal: Hi, sorry for delayed anwser. I've sent today beta version of Vicuna to Petr Reischig. Yarl ✉ 20:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

"Nowe reguły" wprowadzane przez użytkowników zza Odry

Dobry wieczór. Czy mógłbyś temu userowi (Lienhard Schulz) wytłumaczyć żeby przestał wstawiać pod arboretum Wirty kategorię West Prussia ? Ostatecznie pod takimi historycznymi kategoriamii miały znajdować się tylko pliki historyczne z przed 1918/19 oraz historyczne mapy, herby i flagi a nie kompletne kategorie obejmujące komplet mediów. Wielokrotnie usuwałem już takie kategorie z kategorii polskich dworców, kościołów, zamków, pałacy itd ... niestety zawsze znajdzie się jakiś "wieczniewczorajszointeligentniejszy" zza Odry. Dla kategorii obiektów i instytucji nieruchomych (jaką bez wątpienia jest Arboretum Wirty) obowiązuje przecież współczesne kryterium geograficzne a nie epizod z okresu zaboru pruskiego w XIX wieku. Podobne dziwolągi tworzy user (Thoma) patrz tu przypisując je ostatecznie pod ... dwory w Niemczech i Siedliska arystokratyczne w Niemczech ... gdyby to robił tylko z plikami historycznymi z przed 1918/19 lub 1945 to "pal sześć" ale on podwiesza pod to całe kategorie (patrz np. tu dwór Sierakowskich w Waplewie Wielkim, Pałac w Krokowej, dwór obronny w Grocholinie na Pałukach itd..). Dzięki z góry za ewentualną pomoc. pozdr. 80.171.35.18 16:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Cześć, napisałem Lienhardowi dwa słowa, w razie czego będę dalej interweniował.

Co do dworków/pałaców rozumiem, że rozchodzi się o Category:Former Rittergüter in Poland. Fakt, jakaś średnio sensowna tak kategoria, i nieszczęśliwie podpięta pod współczesne Niemcy. Pomyślę co z tym zrobić. Yarl ✉ 19:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Ja usunąłem Category:Former Rittergüter in Poland z Category:Defence Court in Grocholin, Category:Palace in Radojewo, Category:Manor in Gdynia Mały Kack i Category:Manor house of family Sierakowski in Waplewo Wielkie (chodź Mały Kack należał chyba do zakonu kartuzów, a nie do państwa polskiego). Co do pałacu w Krokowej, to nie jestem pewien, co należy zrobić; z tego, co czytam, wynika, że historycznie wieś była bardziej kaszubska niż polska… odder (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Według mnie jeśli dany dwór był kiedyś w posiadaniu arystokracji niemieckiej to kategoria tego dworu powinna być w kategorii Category:Former Rittergüter in Poland. Tak samo możemy mieć kategorie byłych dworków szlacheckich na ziemiach wschodnich, np. większość podkategorii Category:Manors in Belarus można by było dodać do Category:Former Polish manors in Belarus. Nie zgadzam się z 80.171.35.18 ze tylko stare zdjęcia powinny być tak kategoryzowane, jeśli ktoś by stworzył Category:Former Polish manors in Belarus to bym tam dodał cała Category:Tadeusz Kościuszko manor in Mereczowszczyzna a nie poszczególne pliki. --Jarekt (talk) 13:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Documentation needed for three Vicuña Uploader messages

• translatewiki:Thread:Support/About_Vicuna:Settings-program-descfile-file/en (10 months old)
• translatewiki:Thread:Support/About_Vicuna:File-date/en (same)
• translatewiki:Thread:Support/About_Vicuna:Fileedit-info/en_(3)
• translatewiki:Thread:Translating_talk:Vicuña_Uploader/About_Vicuna:Server-ok/en

Thanks, Nemo 11:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

VicuñaUpload Cats Offline

Hey Yarl,
I'm very happy with testing Vicuña after a advice from WikiAnika :) . Would it be possbile for the event de:Wikipedia:Neiße to make all categories in the suggestion field accessible in a LAN without an internet connection? Am I right, that we could use a identically folder of different people and their session file to upload many pictures with a mass account in one flush? Thank you, Conny (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC).

@Conny: So you want from each participant to load photos to Vicuna and save session, and later upload everything from one machine? Sure, it's possible. This month I'll release new version with many improvements. Yarl ✉ 22:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

It's just an idea :) . But if categories can not be showed the participant offline (or via local network), than it would not be handable... Conny (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC).

Translation

Hallo Yarl,

I need help with translation of Template:Wikipedians in Seifhennersdorf/Navigation. I don't get how to do Template:Wikipedians in Seifhennersdorf/Navigation/en, Template:Wikipedians in Seifhennersdorf/Navigation/de, Template:Wikipedians in Seifhennersdorf/Navigation/pl .... --Anika (talk) 15:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

@Anika: I can translate, but from en to pl. You need someone to translate it to English. As far as I know, base text must be in English, and then it should work. Yarl ✉ 16:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

We have now translation for the official registration, pages are available in english. Hope that is enough for people to understand :) . We can also do a hangout when needed - in mixed english and polish speaker, if there is a translator. Greetings, Conny (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC).

YarluFileBot

Hey there, Yarl. We've had some discussion over at User talk:TeleComNasSprVen#Category:Images from Fotopolska review needed about the category your bot uses, but since it's been inactive since October 2012, I'm wondering, do you plan on using that bot any time in the future? Could you drop a line over at the discussion on my talkpage if you do so? Thanks, TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, do you think you still might want to run this bot later in the future? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

One week for official registration

Hey Yarl,
it would be very nice, if you can advertise the event on some places for interested Polish Wikimedians. Official Registration in your language can be found here. Happy, greetings to you all, Conny (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC).

Vicuña - no uploads possible since 3 days

Hi Yarl,

there seems to be an serious login issue with Vicuña, possibly caused by the new java version... As seen in Commons_talk:VicuñaUploader#Files_not_uploading it seems to be a general problem for all users. I logged in as usual, the successfull login is shown in Vicuña, but no upload is possible. The upluad fails, the error message shows it failed because i was not logged in.

Because there is no upload from Vicuña since April 29th, seems not to be dependend from certain Users hard- and Software. The problem occured already before I updated to "Java 7 Update 55" yesterday.

Maybe you can look for some solution... Thanks. - Andy king50 (talk) 10:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

just tried und uploaded alot of files successfully, problem seems to be solved. Thank you very much for the this useful tool. - Andy king50 (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Hello Yarl ! See you soon. Hopefully Yours Frze > talk 03:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014

Hello Yarl! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poco² 17:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Predator 02.jpg

File:Predator 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 09:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Yarl/archive 5, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 19:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hi! Don't you think you should inform the blocking admin when removing a block? What happened that you unblocked User: Maria Kawa? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: hi, did you bother to write to Maria Kawa? This is a worker of Gmina Bochnia, without any suspicious behavior. After consultations with another Polish Wikipedia admin (who receives complaint) i reverted ban. Cheers, Yarl ✉ 07:27, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

That's why I am asking why you didn't let me know. I am not opposing the ban, just asking what's going on. Thanks for reply and no hard feelings, please. Best regards, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 15:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

(3753) Cruithne

(3753) Cruithne has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

مازن المعافر (talk) 20:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Java Version in Vicuña

Yarl, could you help me please with my non-starting Vicuña? I think it could be only a small problem. Thanks. --Packa (talk) 11:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons bot inactivity

Hello! Your bot User:YarluFileBot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. --Dschwen (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Batonik Jacek.jpg

File:Batonik Jacek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Krowka.jpg

Yours sincerely, 🎂CAKE🎂 23:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Juliet? (4508576777).jpg

Hi Yarl, I just want to inform you, that I nominated the file File:Juliet? (4508576777).jpg, which you transferred from Flickr for deletion. Sorry, Best regards -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

@NorbertNagel: : Thanks for info, you are probably right. Yarl ✉ 14:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikiekspedycja 2009

http://www.transport-publiczny.pl/wiadomosci/gdansk-usuwa-znaki-drogowe-47837.html

Znasz? Zwiadowca ²¹ 21:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Ws. plików

Cześć, nie wiem jaki jest sens chowanie plików do jak najgłębszych kategorii, później trudno odnaleźć pliki. Ja np. dodaje pliki aby ktoś je mógł łatwo odlależć i wykorzystać. Dla mnie to jest bezsensu, dodawanie plików a później chomikowanie ich, nie wiem po co jakieś stwarzać trudności, przecież to wszystko jest z jednego miasta. --RafalSs (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@RafalSs: Zgadzam się, że niekoniecznie jest to wygodne, ale taka jest konwencja na Commons. Inaczej w kategorii Poland byłoby z milion plików. Polecam Commons:Kategorie#Nadmierna kategoryzacja. Yarl ✉ 08:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Re:Stawy w Brzeszczach

Dzięki, usunąłem przez przypadek. --Paterm (talk) 01:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:National_costumes_by_country

National costumes by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 00:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Platforma Obywatelska wordmark.svg

File:Platforma Obywatelska wordmark.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Dzielnice Rudy Śląskiej

Cześć! Zauważyłem, że na mapce File:Dzielnice Rudy Śląskiej.svg brakuje dzielnicy Czarny Las, która powstała w 2007. tu jest aktualna mapka, czy dałbyś radę uaktualnić te mapki na commons? D T G (talk) 13:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

@D T G: OK, jak nie zapomnę to w najbliższym czasie poprawię. Yarl ✉ 11:07, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Archiwum Burszty

Widzę że dużo z zdjęć z tego archiwum trafia do kategorii na sprawdzanie skategoryzowania. Proponuję by trafiały do Category:Images from Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Adam Mickiewicz University – needing category checks, ułatwi to pracę. Z chęcią pomogę w kategoryzacji, a takie działanie pomogłoby w pracy. A i czy zdjęcia nie powinny trafiać do Category:Images from Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Adam Mickiewicz University? Bo jak instytut by zaczął dokumentować inną swoją działalność to może powstać bałagan. Wiem że nie wszystko z tego co zaproponawałem jest do przeskoczenia, bo domyślam się że była jakaś umowa. Kapsuglan (talk) 17:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

@Kapsuglan: nawet nie dużo, a wszystkie :) – ładuję zdjęcia od razu z tym szablonem. Fajnie, że chcesz się tym zająć, także chętnie zrobię poprawki, żeby było ci wygodniej. Zastanawiałem się nad przeniesieniem zdjęć do Category:Images from Józef Burszta Digital Archives, krótsze i wiadomo o co chodzi (@Marta Malina Moraczewska: mogłoby tak być?). Jeśli chodzi o kategorię "Images from X needing category checks" to niestety nie da się jej dodać jako parametr do {{Check categories}}. Mogę ją dodać bez problemu jako zwykłą kategorię na końcu, ale trzeba będzie ją ręcznie usunąć – nie będzie to problematyczne? Yarl ✉ 14:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@Yarl: Pracowało by się o wiele lepiej, nawet jeśli trzeba by ręcznie usuwać, wtedy byłaby pewność że żadne zdjęcie nam nie "zginie" Kapsuglan (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@Kapsuglan: Images from Józef Burszta Digital Archives – needing category checks Yarl ✉ 20:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

@Yarl: Dzięki wielkie, powolutku będę sprawdzał te zdjęcia. Kapsuglan (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

User:BursztaBot

Gratulacje! Zaraz jestem botem. Przeproszem za moj polski :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Kategoria

Witaj – czy rozumiesz dlaczego bot nadaje takie kategorie? [1] – Darekm135 (talk) 17:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

@Darekm135: Cześć, tak, wiem czemu tak jest. Do zdjęć ładowane są domyślnie kategorie dla Polski (X in/of Poland). Jeśli w tagach na stronach archiwum Burszty jest inny kraj to go podmieniam. Niestety dużo zdjęć z zagranicy nie ma podanego kraju jako tag, jest tylko w opisie lokacji. Tam często lokacja jest zapisywana w różnych formatach, więc często kategorie mogłyby się wysypać. Także to co jest to najczęściej mniejsze zło. Zresztą fotki da się w miarę łatwo przenieść z jednej kat. do drugiej. Yarl ✉ 08:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Znowu mam problem za zdjęciem z Archiwum – ale tym razem żadnych pretensji do bota :) – to zdjęcie [2] w Archiwum jest źle opisane (u nas tutaj). Napisano: Lokacja: Proboszczowice, pow. Turek / faktycznie jest taka wieś, obecnie w powiecie sieradzkim, w gminie Warta, ale w tej wsi nie ma kościoła, a na zdjęciu jest Kościół św. Mikołaja w Warcie. Drugie zdjęcia opisane jako Proboszczowice [3] – być może to jest opisywana wieś, ale błędy "lubią chodzić parami". Spróbuję zapytać wikipedystę z tamtych okolic. Jeśli chodzi o kościół próbowałem wysłać wiadomość przez stronę kontaktową Archiwum [4], ale wciąż otrzymuję komunikat o błędzie w połączeniu. Mógłbym oczywiście wstawić do zdjęcia dobrą kategorię [5] i szablon z prośbą o zmianę nazwy pliku, ale pozostaje problem źródła podanego na stronie – i ktoś w przyszłości może przywrócić obecny opis. Bardzo dziękuję za udostępnianie zasobu Archiwum. Darekm135 (talk) 09:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

@Darekm135: Jeszcze nie mamy mechanizmu zwrotnego. Ja zacząłem wpisywać tutaj, bo też co nieco znalazłem: Commons talk:Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Adam Mickiewicz University. Mam nadzieję, że Marta potem przekaże zgłoszone błędy. Yarl ✉ 10:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Bar#pictures_of_geese

Hallo Pawel, do you know someone able to help? --PigeonIP (talk) 10:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bytom - Zoo 02.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bytom - Zoo 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bytom - Zoo 02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 14:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:KIT-license/pl

Template:KIT-license/pl has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spinster (talk) 12:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stanisław Krawczyk.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stanisław Krawczyk.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Stanisław Krawczyk.jpg

File:Stanisław Krawczyk.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 21:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I removed the speedy tag. Seems like you forgot to add a license :-) Best, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: thanks. Actually, it was uploaded during Wikipedia workshop :). Now I'm waiting for permission, it should be sent via OTRS soon. Yarl ✉ 18:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Works for me. :-)) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stanisław Krawczyk.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stanisław Krawczyk.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

@JuTa: You probably haven't seen discussion above. I removed your template, FYI. Yarl ✉ 09:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gunther von Hagens mit einem Gorilla-Plastinat - 2010.jpg

Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)