User talk:Xosema
File:Abdali-I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Maulrocketimg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Maulrocket.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Aura_spacecraft.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aura_spacecraft.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Aryabhata_Satellite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 912c494b861375d4ae43a971715b726d
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 08:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Applications Technology Satellite 3 (ATS 3).gif is uncategorized since 2 March 2009. BotMultichillT 08:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:CRAF.jpg is uncategorized since 15 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:ERBS.jpg is uncategorized since 22 March 2009.
- Image:Mightysat1.jpg is uncategorized since 14 April 2009.
- Image:Almacencentral.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:FachadaLaPalma.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Gajendra Kumar Ghose.jpg was uncategorized on 14 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:ARGOS_spacecraft.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ARGOS_spacecraft.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:ARGOS_spacecraft.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Please use lossless cropping tools
[edit]Thank you for helping with those files in Commons:Media for cleanup. However, please ensure that you are using a lossless cropping tool such as jpegtran, XnView or IrfanView and include the text of the removed captions(s) on the image page. I already fixed the following files:
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-09943,_Sir_Henry_Segrave.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_B_145_Bild-F021173-0020,_Bonn,_Computer_im_Bundestag.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_B_145_Bild-F004454-0010,_Karlspreis_Aachen,_Verleihung_an_Paul-Henri_Spaak.jpg
- File:Brogi,_Giacomo_(1822-1881)_-_n._3818_-_Milano_-_La_cattedrale.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-09946,_Sir_Henry_Segrave.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-09944,_Sir_Henry_Segrave.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-07836,_Major_Sir_Henry_Segrave_im_Rennboot.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_B_145_Bild-F038801-0009,_Wolfsburg,_VW_Autowerk.jpg
-- Common Good (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:1~Main_Entry_of_Main_Branch.gif
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1~Main_Entry_of_Main_Branch.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1~Main_Entry_of_Main_Branch.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wknight94 talk 12:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:2~Main_Building_of_Main_Branch.gif
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2~Main_Building_of_Main_Branch.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2~Main_Building_of_Main_Branch.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wknight94 talk 12:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:4~Main_Entry_of_2nd_Branch.gif
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:4~Main_Entry_of_2nd_Branch.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:4~Main_Entry_of_2nd_Branch.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wknight94 talk 12:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Almacencentral.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Almacencentral.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Almacencentral.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:FachadaLaPalma.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:FachadaLaPalma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FachadaLaPalma.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pico Sacro - 02 - Panorama polar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Villa_di_Poggio_a_Caiano,_sala_di_Leone_X,_Lunetta_di_Alessandro_Allori,_il_giardino_delle_Esperidi.JPG
[edit]File:Villa_di_Poggio_a_Caiano,_sala_di_Leone_X,_Lunetta_di_Alessandro_Allori,_il_giardino_delle_Esperidi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pratoprovincia 22:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:ARGOS experiments.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ARGOS experiments.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 5975d6f1a107079e5e3a66493216483b
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File source is not properly indicated: File:Southern part of shenyang city.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Southern part of shenyang city.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Southern part of shenyang city.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
shizhao (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
He usado una foto tuya
[edit]Hola Xosema.
He usado una foto tuya de Triturus marmoratus en mi proyecto educativo de software libre "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
Puedes verla directamente en este vínculo y en la imagen "Siguiente" un recorte:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33400
Si quieres, envíame unas palabras y/o una foto para tu "ficha de colaborador" en Animalandia:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Xosema
Como ejemplo, ésta es la mía:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
En adelante, seguro que volveré a usar fotos tuyas.
Gracias por la licencia y, por supuesto, por tus espléndidas fotos!!
Saludos, Fernando Lisón
--Fernando.lison (talk)
Re: Re: He usado una foto tuya
[edit]Gracias Xosema. ¿Has considerado la posibilidad de completar tu ficha de colaborador con un texto y/o una foto tuyas? http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Xosema
(Gracias también por tu apunte sobre la wiki, que estoy muy verde todavía...)
Fernando --Fernando.lison (talk)
Gracias Xosema!
You have rotedated thei image. But that is wrong, 'Madeline Champion' has hanging/pendent flowers. Please don't rotate more of them. Uleli (talk) 11:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Equator-S.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
178.6.52.33 11:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token c2b5d9558b97d88d4f82babdf09cc927
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:Salt water fish with Finnish text.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:As clareiras na mata foram surgindo logo após a ocupação.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:As clareiras na mata foram surgindo logo após a ocupação.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Xosema, would you mind if I propose this image for deletion? It is rather unfocussed and technically not of the best quality to be usable. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Kitten - 11.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Foto del Accidente de Angrois-Santiago
[edit]Hola, hemos subido tu espeluznante documento a www.ferropedia.es]. Una pregunta: ¿la foto fue tomada a las 20h02 o a las 21h02?. Gracias por este documento histórico. --Ferropediamember (talk) 16:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Foto del Accidente de Angrois-Santiago
[edit]- Muchas gracias por tu respuesta y por por poner a disposición este documento. La foto está subida en este archivo de Ferropedia e ilustra el artículo Accidente de Santiago de Compostela--Ferropediamember (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Arco di Parigi a vista notturna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alexander VIII (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:01-CATBA.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:01-CATBA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:01-CATBA.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
whym (talk) 07:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ezaro - 03 - Fervenza-Cascada-Waterfall.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ezaro - 03 - Fervenza-Cascada-Waterfall.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Necco Mary Jane (2128241469).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hangsna (talk) 16:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
I'm very sorry, but these pictures are copyright infringement : The Gare des Guillemins is under copyright. Yours sincerely, --M0tty (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC) M0tty (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Viveiro
[edit]Boas Xosema, vin que subiches varias imaxes de Viveiro e quería saber, se por un casual, non farías tamén unha foto da casa do concello? É que na Galipedia estamos traballando para conseguir fotos de todas as casas dos concellos de Galicia, a páxina de coordinación é esta, e a de Viveiro é unha das que faltan. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Home non!, vale que nos matamos! :) Moitas grazas. Por certo, se tes máis fotos de Viveiro, mira a ver se de casualidade tes algunha da parroquia de Faro. É que temos outro "proxecto" para poñer fotos en tódolos artigos das parroquias de Galicia, aquí por se queres botarlle un ollo e tes algunha parroquia que falte :) Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 07:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Estupendo! :) Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 15:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Serval cat.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 20:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Brignogan-Plages Hafen 74.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
92.139.210.62 16:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Sitte (1843–1903).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 17:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File:AntreasianGuinn199803b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Xosema, this butterfly is actually Maniola jurtina, can you please correct? --LamBoet (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Bandeira bonito, ms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Duindigt rennen.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Duindigt rennen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Duindigt rennen.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Leoboudv (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ares - Hermelinda - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Setra S6 - Empresa Mosquera - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 19:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Xosema, de:User:Seysi identified the image shown above as Ruscus aculeatus on the respective file talk page. I agree and I changed the identification accordingly. Please check the descriptions. The image should also be renamed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)