User talk:The High Fin Sperm Whale
Featured Picture candidate - Elisabethkirche Schneeberg.jpg
[edit]Dear colleague,
Thank you very much for your constructive comment related to my picture Elisabethkirche Schneeberg.jpg. I have re-worked the file in order to reduce the noise. I would greatly appreciate if you could give your advice if you see the necessity for further improvements. In case the new version is now in accordance with your criteria for a Featured Image, I would be glad if you could revise your vote accordingly. Many thanks and kind regards, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The Eagle's Nest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Sarychev Peak.jpg: License disputed
[edit]Hi The High Fin Sperm Whale,
User Avenue added a {{Disputed}} tag. I believe the reason he gave is quite correct, since you uploaded the image with File:Sarychev Peak Volcano erupts on Matua Island.jpg as it's source, which is {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} licensed. The original for that was in the public domain, which means, among other things, that everybody is free to modify or re-license it (as the Flickr user did).
Please license your work (File:Sarychev Peak.jpg) under the {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} license. Be sure to keep atleast the prevous attributions in tact and adding your own as disired. You may do so by replacing the {{PD-NASA}} tag.
The original attribution was "John". Something like the the following would be valid example:
=={{int:license-header}}==
{{cc-by-sa-2.0|attribution=
[[User:The High Fin Sperm Whale|The High Fin Sperm Whale]], [http://flickr.com/photos/97838323@N00 John]
}}
If you do not wish to license your image under the Creative Commons license, then this work is likely a copyright violation (which you probably didn't intend it to be ;-) ) and would have to be removed from Commons. Sorry if this all sounds complicated, licenses can be a plain sometimes.
Feel free to ask me or the Copyright questions page if you need anything.
Thanks, –Krinkletalk 22:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, it looks good now. –Krinkletalk 23:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reflection of tree.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harrison Lake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit].jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambystoma gracile (Northwestern Salamander).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Elisabethkirche Schneeberg
[edit]Dear colleague,
I would give you an update about my photo of the Elisabethkirche on the Schneeberg in Lower Austria. In the meantime, Amada44 has significantly improved the photo, so I would kindly invite you to give a hopefully favourable opinion on the FP candidature of this new version.
Many thanks and kind regards,
Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Now that the results are confirmed (8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral), What happens next? The image is still not featured even tho it has more support than oppose. Could be kind enough to explain seeing how this is the picture I nominated to be a featured picture. Thanks -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sikorsky CH-124.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sikorsky CH-124 Sea King.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_3.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_2.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_nest.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bald-faced hornet (Dolichovespula maculata) nest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit].JPG) |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Shaggy inkcaps (Coprinus comatus).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shaggy inkcaps (Coprinus comatus).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
[edit]-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].JPG){kind=spacer} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Clearfin lionfish (Pterois radiata).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterois radiata (Clearfin lionfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Set Promotion
[edit]Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Pseudacris regilla (Pacific tree frog).
Pseudacris regilla (Pacific tree frog).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Clearfin lionfish (Pterois radiata).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clearfin lionfish (Pterois radiata).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Ring-billed Gull.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yikrazuul (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Polyphemus Moth (Antheraea polyphemus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-3.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Polyphemus Moth (Antheraea polyphemus) -3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
photo credit
[edit]Hi there,
I'd like to give you credit for photo of a Northwestern Salamander that you took. We're using the photo in a free brochure about Yukon Amphibians. Though Northwestern Salamander are not found in Yukon, it's one to watch for as many animals move north.
Send your name to carrie.mcclelland@gov.yk.ca and I'd be happy to give credit.
Cheers Carrie
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilliwack Lake (British Columbia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coquihalla Canyon Provincial Park (British Columbia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Copyright status: File:FE-310.jpg
[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:FE-310.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
moogsi (blah) 21:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wahleach Lake panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image use on Wikify.ru
[edit]Hallo The High Fin Sperm Whale, your nice image File:Clearfin lionfish (Pterois radiata).JPG is used on the website wikify.ru in a currently license-violating manner (no author credit, no mentioning of the license). Regrettably, this website seems to belong a user (even admin) on :ru and Commons. If you like, you may comment here or here. This would be especially relevant in case you have granted to User:Gruznov special conditions for use of your image, which differ from the CC license, as then this use may not constitute a license-violation. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
2014 !
[edit]
|
* * * 2014! * * * |
| Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC) |
- I'm a little late but thank you! I hope you had good holidays as well. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Happy holidays! 2015!
[edit]
|
* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * * | |
| * Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Crescent Nebula from Chandra.jpg
- File:Jupiter Aurora.jpg
- File:Messier 16 Chandra.jpg
- File:NGC 281 from Chandra.jpg
Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear The High Fin Sperm Whale,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear The High Fin Sperm Whale,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started
[edit]
|
It is a world event.
This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Identification of photo File:Hypholoma fasciculare 4 edit1.jpg
[edit]
Hello. This photo does not look like Hypholoma fasciculare, instead it shows some species of Pholiota. Please see the file talk page. I would like to change the category to "Unidentified Pholiota". Is that OK? Strobilomyces (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Good eye! Yes, upon review it does look a lot like a Pholiota, and since I don't trust my identification skills (especially from 10 years ago) I don't mind at all. Thanks for letting me know! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, fine. I changed it (not the file name) but some of the language descriptions need attention, I can't work in all those languages. Strobilomyces (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I'll do what I can but I definitely don't speak most of the languages either. I'll edit the French and Japanese descriptions if that helps. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, that just leaves Korean, Macedonian and Ukranian. Strobilomyces (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I'll do what I can but I definitely don't speak most of the languages either. I'll edit the French and Japanese descriptions if that helps. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, fine. I changed it (not the file name) but some of the language descriptions need attention, I can't work in all those languages. Strobilomyces (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Campsites in Canada has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Geo Swan (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |