User talk:Simon Villeneuve/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Stéphane Durand (physicien).jpg is uncategorized since 14 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Le Volume Était Au Maximum (groupe de musique) (recadré).jpg is uncategorized since 14 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Le Volume Était Au Maximum (groupe de musique).jpg is uncategorized since 14 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Conférence Wikimédia à Trois-Rivières.JPG is uncategorized since 17 June 2009.
- Image:Raymond Archambault01.jpg was uncategorized on 24 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Cimetière Saint-Anne, Chicoutimi01.JPG was uncategorized on 7 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Salut,
Stp, n'oublie pas d'ajouter le modèle {{OTRS pending}} quand tu importes une image dont tu n'es pas l'auteur, mais pour lequel une autorisation a été envoyée sur OTRS ;)
En l'occurrence, l'autorisation n'est pas valide, donc j'ai signalé l'absence de permission.
Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 11:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Je commence à en avoir assez de la procédure actuelle de Commons. J'ai essayé d'importer les images de cette Category à l'aide de Commonist, non fonctionnel sous Windows 7-64 bits. J'ai donc importé une à une les photos. Ça m'a prit une soirée entière.
- J'ai envoyé le formulaire à mon ami en prenant le temps de tout lui expliquer et il s'est glissé une ligne de trop dans la liste des images qu'il donne (la ligne concernant la catégorie). En quoi cette ligne invalide le reste du courriel de consentement ? Si le formulaire proposé sur Commons:OTRS n'est pas bon, il faut le changer. Y a-t-il un formulaire universel que l'on peut envoyer aux auteurs intéressés à donner leurs photos sans que l'on doive faire le travail en double ou en triple ?
- Vous avez également invalidé les photos de la CSN que j'ai peiné à obtenir. Êtes-vous conscient comment il est difficile de faire comprendre comment utiliser la procédure OTRS à un baby-boomer ?
- Vous êtes chanceux que je sois un wikimédien d'expérience. Je contiens à peine ma colère qui, plus jeune, aurait explosée ici et n'aurait amené que des échanges inconstructifs. - Khayman (contact) 14:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Re-bonjour,
- Ce n'est évidemment pas parce que l'auteur a mentionné Category:Vues aériennes du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean dans son courriel que l'autorisation n'a pas été validée. Et ce n'est pas en m'agressant sur ma page de discussion que tu résoudras le problème : tu as répondu par courriel et c'est tant mieux, mon message sur ta pdd n'étant qu'une question de forme, le problème de fond devant être réglé par courriel.
- Ceci étant dit, je sais à quel point il est complexe de faire placer des documents sous licence libre. Ça ne veut pas dire pour autant que le système OTRS doit valider tout et n'importe quoi : il faut 1) une autorisation valide 2) un faisceau d'indices permettant de confirmer que nous ayons affaire à l'auteur du fichier. Désolé si tu en as assez de ces exigences que des dizaines de personnes parviennent pourtant à remplir, mais je ne peux rien y faire.--Bapti ✉ 16:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Canon de glace07.JPG
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Canon de glace07.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
78.55.23.180 07:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Vue_manga_minimaliste_Prise_de_tête_avec_les_jambes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
deerstop. 10:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Rivière Matapédia
Bonjour, j'ai vu deux de vos photos de la rivière Matapédia, est-il possible de savoir à quelle hauteur elles ont été prises ? Amqui (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Alors, cela demeure un mystère ? Amqui (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg?zz=1
Salut, J'ai demandé la suppression de la page « File:Linguistic peace quebec.jpg?zz=1 ». Mais si tu en as encore besoin, tu n'as qu'à enlever le bandeau de demande de suppression. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:52, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
File moving
When you move a file, please leave a template on User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands so we can get the usage on other projects cleaned up. Thank you. Courcelles (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you're sure it isn't used anywhere, there is no need to bother listing it on the delinker page. Courcelles (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Image rotation
Hi, I marked a few of your latest files for rotation by bot. Wikimedia software gets orientation data from file's EXIF so if your camera supports it you shouldn't rotate the files manualy or rotate them using software that changes exif.Plushy (talk) 16:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Don't rotate them at all and it should be correct.Plushy (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Judge J Frederic Voros Jr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Genimage.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Genimage.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Fait
J'ai fait la modification tel que demandé. Vérifie si tout est correct et dis-le moi s'il y a un problème. Letartean (talk) 12:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Simon Villeneuve, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 08:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Copyright status: File:Arboretum de Saint-Fulgence06.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Arboretum de Saint-Fulgence06.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
January (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Entrée du pavillon Judith-Jasmin01.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Entrée du pavillon Judith-Jasmin01.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 22:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jean-Marie Tremblay et Christian Vandendorpe.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Marie Tremblay et Christian Vandendorpe.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 15:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Prison de Bordeaux02.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Prison de Bordeaux02.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 11:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Pays par référence
Je viens de tomber sur cette très bonne carte. Avez-vous une version plus récente ? - Simon Villeneuve 13:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Bonjour. File:Wikipédia-Pays par références.svg est de 2005. En 2011, LD a fait File:WPFRLinks(2011).png et j’ai fait File:Wikipédia-Pays par liens.2011.07.svg. --moyogo (talk) 13:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Simon Villeneuve, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Simon Villeneuve, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Simon Villeneuve,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:PKP.jpg
Salut Simon,
Juste pour te signaler que j'ai proposé ce fichier en suppression : Commons:Deletion requests/File:PKP.jpg, étant donné que l'utilisateur flickr n'est vraisemblablement pas l'auteur des éléments qu'il a utilisé dans son montage humoristique. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Jeju Island has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Alan Liefting (talk) 06:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Coffee-Crisp Mocha-Canada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 11:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Courriel.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.111.251.243 14:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Vance et Jean - Afghanistan 2009 (4149674264).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Asclepias (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Ngc2024 med.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Revent (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Capture d'écran de l'article listes d'artistes allemands.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Capture d'écran de l'article listes d'artistes allemands.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
nucleosynthesis_periodic_table.svg
Hi Simon,
Thank you very much for adding the French translation to file:nucleosynthesis_periodic_table.svg. Could I trouble you to add the translation of "All elements above lawrencium (not shown) are also manmade." to the French description, please?
Thanks in advance,
cmglee (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much again, Simon! cmglee (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Cmglee: Thank you to you for this image and congratulation for it's appeareance in the APOD of January 25, 2016. --- Simon Villeneuve 00:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup! cmglee (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Cmglee: Thank you to you for this image and congratulation for it's appeareance in the APOD of January 25, 2016. --- Simon Villeneuve 00:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Google Doodle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Mine Niobec03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
74.122.245.75 19:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Capture d'écran pédagogique de Wikipédia en français has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Carnby (talk) 20:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
SVG language classification
Bonjour Simon,
when you upload more SVG files I would like to ask you categorizing them as Category:SVG diagrams in French.
Thank you very much --Organic Shahada (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Audio
Bonjour, pouvez-vous enregistrer le mot seize, chaise, naître, maître et baleine SVP? 104.244.64.173 12:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done - Simon Villeneuve 13:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup. 104.244.64.173 20:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Pouvez-vous enregistrer le nom Canada SVP? Prononcez « canadâ » avec le son « â » en québécois. 104.244.64.173 21:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup. 104.244.64.173 14:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Enregistrements:
- jaune
- rêve
- passeport
- cône
- taupe
- Terre
- bras
- treize
- mort
- corps
- fraise
- tempête de neige
- hamburger
- fève
- mât
- caisse
- enquête
- sauvage
- cellulaire
- histoire
- poêle
- vêtement
- champêtre
- sirène
- renne
104.244.64.173 16:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup, mais j'ai entendu « rèj » au lieu de « rêve ». 104.244.64.173 16:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- C'est bien « rêve » prononcé par moi. J'ai pas une voix radiophonique et je ne suis pas linguiste. Va falloir que tu t'en contentes. --- Simon Villeneuve 18:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- On entend « rèj », c'est à cause de la qualité d'enregistrement. 104.244.64.173 18:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour Monsieur Villeneuve, si vous voulez, vous pouvez réenregistrer le mot « rêve » avec un « v » plus fort. 104.244.64.173 13:14, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
File:LeamyInAction.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
File:John Thomson, Brentford FC footballer, 1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Eugenio Canfari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Charlie Reddock, Brentford FC footballer, 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Charlie Butler, Brentford FC footballer, 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
File:SydneySmithPhoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Anse st jean quai bateau fmclaughlin 1886-min.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
File:North Shore Events Centre home court.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Migebert (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Rcbc plaza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Williamkeith.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Williamkeith.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Williamkeith.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: For a personality of the 18th century ? Seriously ? --- Simon Villeneuve 22:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- I have told you before, only transfer files to Commons if you are prepared to do proper after care. Jcb (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Well man, it's not forbidden to use your brain instead of acting like a soulless robot. --- Simon Villeneuve 23:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe, but it is forbidden to transfer files to Commons without doing proper after care. We have blocked people over this in the past. So if you transfer files, make sure that the information template is properly filled in (at least 'description', 'author' and 'source'), that the file has a valid license and that it is categorized appropriately. Jcb (talk) 16:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Well man, it's not forbidden to use your brain instead of acting like a soulless robot. --- Simon Villeneuve 23:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- I have told you before, only transfer files to Commons if you are prepared to do proper after care. Jcb (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
File:LSMR-409.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Warning
Only transfer files to Commons if you do proper aftercare. You are creating a mess. Jcb (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Wikipédia en hongrois
Mes imports d'images d'infobox biographiques de Wikipédia en hongrois, faits avec CommonsHelper, m'entraîne toute cette liste de protestations. J'ai pourtant sélectionné ces images pour que la majorité d'entre-elles soient dans le domaine public et CC hongrois. Tout ça est décrit dans la description du fichier, mais il faut la lire, ce que je doute que les contributeurs ci-bas aient faits. --- Simon Villeneuve 01:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Miklósi Anna (fotó- Szűcs Éva).jpeg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Miklósi Anna (fotó- Szűcs Éva).jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Miklósi Anna (fotó- Szűcs Éva).jpeg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Pallerti (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Alexander Stael von Holstein.jpg
Copyright status: File:Alexander Stael von Holstein.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Alexander Stael von Holstein.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Baintner Hugó.jpg
Copyright status: File:Baintner Hugó.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Baintner Hugó.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bauer Simon.PNG
Copyright status: File:Bauer Simon.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bauer Simon.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Buday Imre.jpg
Copyright status: File:Buday Imre.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Buday Imre.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:EdmundBackhouse.jpg
Copyright status: File:EdmundBackhouse.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:EdmundBackhouse.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 23:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:FinkeyJózsef.jpg
Copyright status: File:FinkeyJózsef.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:FinkeyJózsef.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 00:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Greiner József.jpg
Copyright status: File:Greiner József.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Greiner József.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 00:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Incze Henrik.PNG
Copyright status: File:Incze Henrik.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Incze Henrik.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jandl Lajos.PNG
Copyright status: File:Jandl Lajos.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jandl Lajos.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 10:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:József Áron.jpg
Copyright status: File:József Áron.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:József Áron.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kondor Bernát.PNG
Copyright status: File:Kondor Bernát.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kondor Bernát.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kulich Gyula.jpg
Copyright status: File:Kulich Gyula.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kulich Gyula.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kákay.jpg
Copyright status: File:Kákay.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kákay.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Magyar Lajos.jpg
Copyright status: File:Magyar Lajos.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Magyar Lajos.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 13:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mausz Rezső.PNG
Copyright status: File:Mausz Rezső.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mausz Rezső.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mokry Sámuel.PNG
Copyright status: File:Mokry Sámuel.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mokry Sámuel.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Szirtes Artur.PNG
Copyright status: File:Szirtes Artur.PNG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Szirtes Artur.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Somogyi Béla.PNG
Copyright status: File:Somogyi Béla.PNG Template:File license/layout Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Szamuely György.jpg
Copyright status: File:Szamuely György.jpg Template:File license/layout Jcb (talk) 23:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Szilasi Móric.JPG
Copyright status: File:Szilasi Móric.JPG Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vezér György Ferenc OP.jpg
Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Zajzoni Rab István.jpg
Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ronhjones (Talk) 15:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Regasterios ([[User talk:Regasterios|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
enregistrements
- feutre
- neutre
- chanteuse
- brocheuse
- à l'aise
- être
- êtes
- aider
- aide
- mètre
- Grèce
- graisse
- problème
- arrêter
- arrête
- arête
- fêter
- extrême
- suprême
- bête
- transport
- super
- primaire
- chaîne
- reître (ça rime avec « être »)
- grêle
- conquête
- quête
- requête
- chevêche
- Lévesque
- connaître
- apparaître
- pâte
- tâche
- espace
- bien-être
- mayonnaise
- lézard
- printemps
- ver
- Pâques
Bonjour Simon. Pouvez-vous enregistrer tous ces mots s'il vous plaît? Merci d'avance. 138.229.19.202 19:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Fait - Simon Villeneuve 14:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup. 138.229.19.202 22:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
File transfer
Hi Simon! Please don't transfer files from external sites when the files are marked do not transfer to commons. Should the file be marked erroneously, please fix the problems on the Wiki or immediately after upload to Commons. Thanks for all the work you do! Cheers! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Castillo blanco ([[User talk:Castillo blanco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Mdaniels5757 ([[User talk:Mdaniels5757|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Regasterios ([[User talk:Regasterios|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
hamster
Bonjour Simon. Pouvez-vous enregistrer le mot « hamster » (prononcé « amsteur ») s'il vous plaît? 138.229.19.202 14:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Schéma cheval-vapeur
Bonjour Simon,
J'ai vu que tu avais produit l'image File:Cheval-vapeur.svg par traduction, je m'en sers dans l'article vikidia:Puissance (physique) :-)
Néanmoins, d'après fr:Cheval-vapeur, l'abréviation en français du cheval-vapeur valant 735,5 W (dit métrique ou français ou européen) est « ch » et non « hp ». Est-ce que tu pourrais modifier l'image ? Merci et à bientôt ! Astirmays ([[User talk:Astirmays|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
Je n'aurai pas accès à un ordinateur avant le 10 août. Je regarderai ça à ce moment. - Simon Villeneuve 15:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)- Rebonjour,
C'est fait. Merci pour ta vigilance ! - Simon Villeneuve 02:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Rebonjour,
OTRS ok
Bonjour Simon,
OTRS traité pour Ste-Rose. Merci pour tes démarches ! kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 17:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Merci à toi! - Simon Villeneuve 17:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Mrcl lxmna ([[User talk:Mrcl lxmna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Arthur Crbz ([[User talk:Arthur Crbz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Arthur Crbz ([[User talk:Arthur Crbz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Vitrail, copyright
Allô Simon,
J'observe que tu as appliqué CC BY-SA à [1] et à [2]. Est-ce que les vitraux sont automatiquement libres de copyright ?
Cantons-de-l'Est ([[User talk:Cantons-de-l'Est|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Coucou,
Bien honnêtement, je l'ignore. J'ai fait le saut de la foi. --- Simon Villeneuve 20:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Warning
Hi Simon Villeneuve. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file with the Template:T2 template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 4nn1l2 ([[User talk:4nn1l2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Glrx ([[User talk:Glrx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
TUSC token 8d679759983964e67dd2a6881b1e7aec
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
Template:Autotranslate Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC) Template:Unsigned2
Template:Autotranslate — Racconish 💬 11:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Aimerais-tu que...
Allô,
je reconnaisse ton soutien pour les photos que j'ai prises dans ton coin de pays ? Je peux insérer une mention dans mes photos du Saguenay.
Cantons-de-l'Est ([[User talk:Cantons-de-l'Est|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Coucou,
Je ne m'y oppose pas, mais c'est toi qui a tout le mérite! - Simon Villeneuve 17:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Vois le bandeau que j'ai apposé sur ce fichier par exemple. Il est présent sur un peu que 310 fichiers. Cantons-de-l'Est ([[User talk:Cantons-de-l'Est|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Photo for an article
Hello! I work for the Eastern Door in Kahnawake and was wondering if I could use your photo of the Jonquière CEGEP for one of my articles. Were you the one who took it? If so, can I simply put your name - Simon Villeneuve - for credits of the photo? Let me know when you can because we are publishing the story this week. Thank you! EmmaJournalist ([[User talk:EmmaJournalist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi,
I took many pictures of the Cégep de Jonquière. Can you link me the one you want to use ?
The CC-BY-SA licence say that you only have to cite my name and publish the resulting work under same licence to reuse the work. - Simon Villeneuve 16:29, 7 March 2023 (UTC)- Thank you for your quick reply!
- This is the photo:
- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%A9gep_de_Jonqui%C3%A8re#/media/Fichier:Campus_du_C%C3%A9gep_de_Jonqui%C3%A8re.jpg
- I'm just unfamiliar as to what this means "publish the resulting work under same licence" - could you help me understand this? EmmaJournalist ([[User talk:EmmaJournalist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- This picture has been taken by Dany Caron. It's him that you must credit.
You cannot put a copyright on the picture. If someone copy it from your publication, you cannot say that it was yours.
Can you please send me the URL of your publication when it will be done ? - Simon Villeneuve 16:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)- Absolutely. So after I caption it, I can say (credit: Dany Caron) and that's all? Or do I have to refer to wikipedia? Thank you so much for your help! EmmaJournalist ([[User talk:EmmaJournalist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- (credit: Dany Caron. Licence : CC-BY-SA). - Simon Villeneuve 16:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Wonderful! Thanks so much for your help. EmmaJournalist ([[User talk:EmmaJournalist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- (credit: Dany Caron. Licence : CC-BY-SA). - Simon Villeneuve 16:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Absolutely. So after I caption it, I can say (credit: Dany Caron) and that's all? Or do I have to refer to wikipedia? Thank you so much for your help! EmmaJournalist ([[User talk:EmmaJournalist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- This picture has been taken by Dany Caron. It's him that you must credit.
Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)