User talk:Shev123/archives 47

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/archives 47⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Shev123,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Deux images

Bonjour,

Pas de problème, vous ne me dérangez pas. J'ai regardé les sources et j'ai peut-être raté quelque chose, mais il n'y a pas d'évidence de licence libre. Sous la photo, le logo CC BY-SA s'applique au texte qui lui provient de Wikipédia. Cependant, la photo de 1923, est très probablement dans le domaine public norvégien. Je ne suis pas un pro des licences, mais ceux qui traitent les demandent de suppression le sauront. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Effectivement, faut faire une procédure OTRS, c'est très simple. Moi j'écris un message du genre "Bonjour, suite à notre conversation, voici la déclaration de consentement. Veuillez cliquer sur "Transférer", puis lire et signer le texte dans l'encadré ci-dessous. Finalement, envoyez à permissions-commons-frwikimedia.org. Assurez-vous d'utiliser votre adresse courriel professionnelle."

Puis je colle l'encadré de consentement au bas du courriel, je complète avec l'URL des photos / licence(s), je signe et basta! Je ne crois pas avoir essuyé de refus ; généralement, les institutions sont fières de cette demande. Si vous choisissez de procéder avec l'OTRS, faites-moi signe, je vais restaurer la ou les photos (m'indiquer l'URL svp). Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Image restaurée. Bravo pour votre travail. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 09:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for filming the Fencers! Rogi (talk) 08:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Palmeraieetdesert

Bonjour,
Concernant les images File:CLAUDINE NOUGARET.pdf et File:RAYMOND DEPARDON AUTOPORTRAIT.jpg, pour lesquelles vous avez apposé le modèle {{No permission since}}, je ne sais pas si User:Palmeraieetdesert consulte fréquemment sa page de discussion mais si vous doutez que ce compte est bien celui de la société de production de Nougaret et Depardon (ce dont je ne doute pas vu l'historique de contribution de ce compte), le plus simple me paraitrait contacter directement cette société de production à l'adresse de courriel que l'on trouve sur son site officiel : http://www.palmeraieetdesert.fr/Nous_contacter.html.
O.Taris (talk) 16:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

@O.Taris: Bonjour

Pour l'image de RAYMOND DEPARDON, l'agence a certainement les droits sur l'image. Par contre, pour l'image de CLAUDINE NOUGARET elle a l'air extrait d'un reportage et je ne pense pas qu'elle soit compatible avec les licences de commons. Je ne suis pas trop chaud pour contacter l'agence de com du couple notamment en termes d'anonymat. --Shev123 (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Il est indiqué pour File:CLAUDINE NOUGARET.pdf que c'est une image de Journal de France, un film de Raymond Depardon et Claudine Nougaret, produit par Palmeraie et Désert. O.Taris (talk) 19:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Sports

Hello, Shev123! You're welcome to join the Commons WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

photo of Anne Wilsdorf

I'm a WikiMooc student and add an article (not yet published) about an illustrator called Anne Wilsdorf. I happen to know her because I'm a librarian and had the gréât opportunity to invite her in the librairy I used to work. She, Anne Wilsdorf, at my request, sent me this morning the picture I inserted in the Infobox. It has been used, certainly with her agreement, by the publisher La Joie de Lire, which doesn't mean I used it without permission !

Please don't delete it ! What can I do to prove it ? Do you want her to write to a specific e-mail address ?

--CoWeb (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

@CoWeb: Il eme semble que qq'un vous a répondu sur la page du WikiMooc. En général, il est très compliqué d'importer une photo prise par qq'un d'autre en raison des licences libres (pas de copyright, utilisation commerciale possible...). De plus, il faut fournir une autorisationde l'ayant droit ce qui n'est jamais évident à obtenir. Ça explique en bonne partie le manque ou les illustrations de faibles qualités que l'on trouve sur la majorité des pages sur wikipédia. --Shev123 (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Anne Wilsdorf a écrit comme demandé à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org pour confirmer l'utilisation sous licence libre de sa photo prise par son mari Henry Meyer !

--CoWeb (talk) 18:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

La photo d'Anne Wilsdorf a été prise par son mari Henry Meyer et c'est elle qui me l'a transmise ! Elle a donnée sa permission en envoyant un mail à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org !

De plus, les creative communs ont 6 licences libres, pourquoi imposer la licence "utilisation commerciale autorisée" si la personne ne le désire pas ! Le share alike signifie bien utiliser l'image avec la même licence non ?? Où est le problème ?? Je ne comprends pas ! On trouve plusieurs images sur Internet avec diverses licences des creative communs, toutes sont des licences libres avec plus ou moins de permissions. L'utilisation commerciale est extrême à mes yeux ! Anne Wilsdorf permet la réutilisation de son image dans l'esprit du share alike ! Supprimer cette image est abusif de votre part, je conteste cette décision. Les règles de Wikipédia sont censées êtres souples, je pense qu'au niveau des licences il vous faudrait songer à faire respecter les CC dans la totalité de ses licences !! Vous aurez peut-être ainsi plus d'images de qualité sur votre encyclopédie ?

Je vous demande d'autoriser cette image et de l'insérer dans l'Infobox à la place de cette que j'y ai mise qui est obsolète.

Merci d'avance --CoWeb (talk) 09:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

licences CC

Bonjour, je crois que les projets Wikimedia (Wikipedia, commons...) sont en CC BY-SA depuis pas loin de 10 ans. Il a été un temps invoqué l'idée de passer en NC mais cela ne s'est jamais fait. Ce sont les règles qu'à choisi la communauté et les administrateurs ne font qu'appliquer les règles. Quelqu'un (pas moi) a proposé la suppression de l'image pour non respect de ces règles et il y a de fortes chances qu'elle soit supprimée. Il n'y a pas véritablement de solutions. Dans le pire des cas, il y a beaucoup de wikipédiens qui vont sur des salons littéraires et quelqu'un aura bien l’occasion de la prendre en photos d'ici quelques temps. --Shev123 (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Photo

Bonjour, Je viens de lire votre demande de suppression de photo. La photo m'a été donné par le réalisateur lui-même, cette photo lui appartient. J'en ai une autre qui a été prise par lui-même mais je n'arrive plus à importer de photos. (elle est bloquée à chaque fois) Comment puis-je faire ? Merci beaucoup, Laetitia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laetitiaduhamel (talk • contribs) 14:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Vu que l'image a déjà été publié ailleurs, il faut suivre cette procédure avec le mail d'autorisation. --Shev123 (talk) 16:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Nordic Combined

Hi Shev123, i just wanted to tell you that i'm in Ramsau right now, pictures of the athletes are coming soon (probably in january). Regards --Ailura (talk) 13:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ailura: Thanks a lot ! It's a great news for nordic combined ! --Shev123 (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for asking, it was a really exciting weekend :) --Ailura (talk) 20:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Shev123, as you may have noticed, Granada and I went to Eisenerz last weekend für COC. --Ailura (talk) 14:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ailura: I have noticed and it is great thing. 90 or 95 % of the nordic athletes have a picture and the future athletes also (most of the athletes at Eisenerz don't have a wiki page right now but will probably have in the next years). I have begin a list on my user page of nordic combined athletes and coachs who dont't have picture. I will try to do a wikidata search to complete it. Thanks to you and Granada ! --Shev123 (talk) 14:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

I can't find a complete list of the COC Results from the last years on the FIS website. If i get the notability rules of the german wikipedia right, the top 10 COC athletes (at the end of the season) plus every athlete with a top 3 position at any competition could theoretically have an article. --Ailura (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ailura:

For last year, here is the Results (you also have the french article fr:Coupe continentale de combiné nordique 2016). We have an article for all the seasons. All the results are also available on this website. We have mostly the same "notoriety criteria" on french wiki and polish wiki. --Shev123 (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

and we have to go again next year for the coaches :) --Ailura (talk) 10:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ailura:

For next year, we will know in May but a woman continental cup is planned to begin in December 2017 or January 2018. You may have coaches and one of the first women competitions of nordic combined ! --Shev123 (talk) 11:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Sounds great, if they go anywhere near Austria, we'll try to be there. --Ailura (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Photos PIC Solaire2016

Bonjour, nous sommes des étudiants et nous devons écrire une page wikipédia. Nous avons reçu des notifications de votre part concernant certaines photos.

La photo : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ensoleillement_en_France_en_2012.png est libre d'accès sur le site de l'union européenne, vous pouvez vous même vérifier en allant sur le site http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/cmaps/eur.htm. La reproduction est autorisée si l'on mentionne la source, chose que nous avons fait.

la photo suivante : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Smart_grid.png vient d'un site d'une commission du gouvernement français. Et nous sommes comme dans le précédent cas autorisé à l'utiliser si nous mentionnons la source http://www.smartgrids-cre.fr/index.php?p=definition-smart-grids. Les mentions légales sont sur ce lien: http://www.smartgrids-cre.fr/index.php?p=mentionslegales.

Quant aux deux autres photos https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%89volution_des_rendements_des_cellules_photovolta%C3%AFques.png et https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carte_ensoleillement_france.gif vous pouvez les supprimer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PIC solaire2016 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

@PIC solaire2016:

Bonjour,

Pour l'image d'Union Européenne, c'est bon. Pour la seconde image, il est marqué dans les conditions du site "mais elles ne peuvent être utilisées à des fins commerciales ou publicitaires. " ce qui contraire aux licences de Commons. Il faut faire attention aux images que vous importez : soit vous importez des images que vous avez réalisées soit vous devez obtenir une autorisation pour publier une image crée par une autre personne. Pour le brouillon, il est loin d'être publiable et vous devriez aller demander un coup de main sur forum des nouveaux ou sur le Projet Energie. --Shev123 (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

User:MusCastCat

I'm a little confused about the situation of the photos uploaded by User:MusCastCat that you've tagged with {{No permission since}}. The user has described these as "own work". Is there some reason to doubt that (e.g. somewhere outside of Wikipedia that the images seem to come from)? Otherwise, what distinguishes this from any other user's claim of own work? If I can't work out what's going on here, how is a brand new user supposed to work it out? - Jmabel ! talk 04:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jmabel: These images were already deleted once (a few days ago) for copyright violation. These images (3D computer graphics) are tag at the bottom right and there a probably not free. There is an OTRS autorization for this image. The OTRS may be global for the 7 images. --Shev123 (talk) 08:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Couvent Royal de St St Maximin la Sainte Baume Localisation.jpg

Hey,

Just to let you know that this file is obviously from Google Maps and therefore it is very unlikely that the user has the rights to release it into a valid license. In this case it is better to mark directly as a copyright violation (in my opinion). :-)

Best regards,

--AntonierCH ^(d) 10:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Martine Boulart

Hi,

Please see my addition to this discussion page. Cheers, Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Martine Boulart.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Martine Boulart.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Photo du groupe Grands Boulevards

Bonjour, Vous avez fait une demande de suppression de la photo de la page du groupe Grands Boulevards. Cette photo m'a été donnée par Anaïs Novembre, dorénavant citée en tant qu'auteur de la photographie. Afin de certifier la publication et qu'elle soit conforme aux règles, une demande de permission lui a été envoyé. Elle y répondra au plus vite, par mail.
Anaïs Novembre et moi ne pensions pas qu'il était nécessaire de faire la démarche de revendication ; la photographe citée étant une intime du groupe concerné.
Merci de votre compréhension. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhniG (talk • contribs) 08:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@AhniG:

Bonjour,

Une autorisation est obligatoire pour toutes le images publiées par une autre personne pour des raisons de droits d'auteurs et pour s'assurer que la personne comprenne bien les termes de la licence (usage commercial des photographies par exemple). Le traitement des autorisations peut être long (a priori une cinquantaine de jours en ce moment) et l'image pourrait être supprimée le temps du traitement (si tout est bon l'image sera remise en ligne). --Shev123 (talk) 08:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Harmony Tan

Thanks for sharing the images you made at the qualification tournament of Roland Garros 2017. I was able to create a nice profile picture of Harmony Tan out of one of your images, and use it on the nl-wiki article I'm writing right now. Edoderoo (talk) 08:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

@Edoderoo:

Thanks for your message. I was at the French Open last wednesday and all the players I wanted to see were not playing that day. So I decided to take pictures of all the players imageless. A very usefull day !--Shev123 (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

For a true Wikipedian, there's never a dull moment ;-) Good to hear you did enjoy your day at last! Edoderoo (talk) 11:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Pierre-Emmanuel Coppin.jpg

I don't understand. This picture is publicly available on multiple websites, including www.servettehc.ch, club for which Mr. Coppin coached for 6+ years. The fact that these pictures are publicly available, and with a copyright notice added, should be enough to have it on Wikipedia. Don't be so pedantic. --Xsantolaria (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Xsantolaria:

Bonjour,

Ce n'est pas parce qu'une image est accessible facilement qu'il est possible de l'utiliser sans le consentement de son auteur (vu que le site du club est sous copyright, l'image l'est également). Donc soit vous obtenez le consentement de l'auteur, Commons:OTRS/fr, soit vous trouvez une image sous une licence compatible, soit vous allez faire vos propres photos. --Shev123 (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Pierre Jarraud. 'Marianne '.

Bonsoir, Merci pour votre attention. Effectivement, l'oeuvre ayant été vendue je n'ai pas l'autorisation écrite de la diffuser. Autant pour moi je vais la supprimer. Cordialement, Charlotte Paccou-Jarraud Charlotte Paccou-Jarraud (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

@Charlotte Paccou-Jarraud:

Bonjour

Le problème n'est que l'oeuvre soit vendue mais le texte est issue du Parisien et c'est le journal qui détient le copyright sur son texte. A priori, vous n'avez pas l'autorisation du journal pour la diffusion de l'article d'où la demande de suppression. En ce qui concerne les autres images, il faut que vous passiez par la procédure d'autorisation car l'artiste n'est pas mort depuis 70 ans (pas dans le domaine public). Sinon les autres images de peintures seront également supprimées. --Shev123 (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Plessis-Robinson Volley-ball - Grand Nancy Volley-Ball - LBM - 11 avril 2017 - 34.webm

File:Plessis-Robinson Volley-ball - Grand Nancy Volley-Ball - LBM - 11 avril 2017 - 34.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Y.haruo (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Plessis-Robinson Volley-ball - Grand Nancy Volley-Ball - LBM - 11 avril 2017 - 40.webm

File:Plessis-Robinson Volley-ball - Grand Nancy Volley-Ball - LBM - 11 avril 2017 - 40.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Y.haruo (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Plessis-Robinson Volley-ball - Grand Nancy Volley-Ball - LBM - 11 avril 2017 - 64.webm

File:Plessis-Robinson Volley-ball - Grand Nancy Volley-Ball - LBM - 11 avril 2017 - 64.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Y.haruo (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

INCIDENT-LIGHT-1.jpg

Hi Shev123,

e-mail sent today @ permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

Yours sincerely, --Arno116 (talk) 17:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

@Arno116:

Bonjour,

Pour l'autorisation (je n'ai pas accès au mail), il faut celle de l'artiste, voir l'entête de Category:FX Combes pour plus d'infos. --Shev123 (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging - 3 images

Hello Shev123,

Following your three messages this afternoon - for your info I have just sent an e-mail to 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org' with the approval for the three images in question.

Thank you.

--Emilie Cecile (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eleonoremenga

Good morning,

I understand that the work of an artist which is alive are under copyright. I am working for the artist Maja Vodanovic and she authorised me to upload those file:

File:Billy Two Rivers.jpg File:In the Still of the Night.jpg File:Maja Vodanovic en 2018.jpg File:Song of the inner courtyard.jpg

What can I do to keep them in the commons to illustrated maja's work?

Thanks --Eleonoremenga (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Eleonoremenga:

Hi,

You need a written autorization from the artist, you can see Commons:OTRS/fr for the complete procedure. --Shev123 (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Images de Gallica

Bonjour, Pour info, les images de Gallica (ex: File:1924 Boat Race Agence Rol.jpg) sont disponibles en haute résolution via [1]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Yann:

Bonjour,

Merci pour l'info ! Par contre, cela représente un énorme travail... --Shev123 (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Commons:OTRS/fr

Bonjour Shev123,

J'ai bien noté vos recommandations. Le photographe Gilles Rammant qui m'a donné l’autorisation d'utiliser cette photo de Benoit Blanc devrait envoyer le mail OTRS dans les 24h.

Pour l’article du Film français je n'ai pas trouvé de version en ligne. Savez-vous comment je dois procéder ? Sachant que j'aimerais écrire d'autres articles wiki sur des youtubeurs et je risque de rencontrer le même type de problème...

Merci pour votre aide.

Bertrand — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiBenib (talk • contribs) 11:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@WikiBenib:

Bonjour,

On ne met pas sur Commons les articles qui servent à la rédaction des articles en raison du droit d'auteur. Ce lien devrait vous aidez à utiliser correctement l'article. --Shev123 (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

File:2017 Roland Garros Qualifying Tournament - 109.jpg

File:2017 Roland Garros Qualifying Tournament - 109.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File Stephane Rousson.jpg

Bonjour Shev123 (talk concernant le fichier le Photographe Francis Demange a envoyé un email le 21/08/2018 à 19:42h sur l'adresse permissions-fr@wikimedia.org donnant son accord pour les 2 photos concernées dans les echanges d'email avec monsieur Antonier Charles.Cordialement--Aeroceanaute (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Jakob Vaage minnesmerke Lilleaker.jpg

File:Jakob Vaage minnesmerke Lilleaker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Shev123,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Shev123/common.js

Hi Shev123, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Shev123/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 22 character 1: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '}'. - Evidence: })(mediaWiki, jQuery);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Shev123/common.js

Hi Shev123, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Shev123/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 22 column 1: Unexpected token }

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC).

I did not know Sens was the location. ««2ème Trial Sports Challenge Entreprises de Sens, Place de la République, Sens, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France, 5 October 2013, 16:08:41»» might be more clear.

FYI see https://pixabay.com/photos/nicolas-vuillermot-trial-sports-855591/

Crêperie Brocéliande in Sens is CLOSED, as well as Crêperie Brocéliande in Paris, is this a group of Crêperie or merely a common name?

24.7.104.84 09:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

No, it is not a group, it is only a common name. --Shev123 (talk) 17:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

File File:Portrait Thierry Kazazian O2 Event.jpg

Bonjour Shev123 concernant les droits de l'image en question j'ai envoyé un email le 09/02/2020 à 19:42h sur l'adresse permissions-commons@wikimedia.org .Bien à vous --Efixef (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960.djvu

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960.djvu. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960.djvu]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Images de la page Groupement d'employeurs

Bonjour Shev123, je suis l'auteur des trois images sur la page "Groupement d'employeurs" (je peux en attester en vous fournissant les fichiers PSD). J'ai également envoyé une autorisation de publication à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Pourquoi demandez-vous la suppression de ces images ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by M2dct Fac2droit Nantes (talk • contribs) 22:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC) --M2dct Fac2droit Nantes (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

@M2dct Fac2droit Nantes:

Bonjour,

Ces images ressemblent beaucoup à des images issues de livres ou de rapport de l'Etat. Vous devriez les importer en SVG pour favoriser leurs réutilisations. --Shev123 (talk) 20:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

autorisation des photos

Bonsoir,

je viens de vous envoyer les autorisations demandées, je vous précise que pour la photo d'Arlette Chaumorcel dans l'atelier du peintre Arthur Van Hecke j'avais déjà reçu le mail de permission d'utilisation de la part de vos services, je me suis donc permise de vous transférer ce mail d'autorisation. Désolée d'être source de problèmes, mais je débute et je ne comprends pas toutes les fonctionnalités (loin s'en faut) je vous prie de m'en excuser. Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacarabosse (talk • contribs) 20:19, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Il y a un temps de traitement assez long pour les autorisations. Les agents OTRS (pas moi) semblent s'en occuper. --Shev123 (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Autorisation d'utilisation d'images

Bonjour Shev123

Je vous écrit pour savoir comment vais je donner une permission a la photo qui a été prise avec mon téléphone juste après l’émission sur le plateau de CIS Tv.

La photo a été prise après l’émission avec mon téléphone comme les autres notamment celle la prise a la RTG Makeme et journaliste de la RTG.jpg ou celle la a l'orphelina Makémé et des orphelin.jpg.--Makemeheroinekonate (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

@Makemeheroinekonate:

Bonjour,

Vu que l'image a été prise par un téléphone, c'est bon. Je pensais qu'il s'agissait une capture d'écran d'une émission de télé ce qui n'est possible de mettre sur Commons. --Shev123 (talk) 13:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Shev123

Merci pour le travail.--Makemeheroinekonate (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

utilisation de la photo alex lanier.jpg

Bonjour Shev123,

je vous confirme que j'ai bien obtenu l'autorisation de l’utilisation par écrit sur la messagerie instantanée de badmintonart de ce fichier par badmintonart Raphael Ronga.

cet échange par écrit avec badmintonart s'étant effectué sur la messagerie instantanée , j'ai envoyé un mail à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org afin de leur adresser une capture écran de ce message.

Néanmoins suite votre message, j’ai recontacté mr Ronga afin qu’il veuille bien remplir le formulaire Wiki tel que vous le suggérez et me le transférer sur ma messagerie. Je suis en attente de sa réponse.

bien cordialement

--De Reinal (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour,

C'est très bien ! Le traitement des mails d'autorisations peut prendre un peu de temps. --Shev123 (talk) 22:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment transmettre une autorisation écrite ?

Bonjour, je comprends votre position de supprimer la licence concernant la photo de Jeremy AMELIN. Comment peut-il transmettre l'autorisation écrite que vous décrivez ? Et à qui ? Bien cordialement.

Bonjour,

Tout est décrit dans Commons:OTRS (mail type de consentement et adresse mail à qui l'adresser). --Shev123 (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Droits sur images

Bonjour Shev123,

Merci pour vos remarques sur les photos de l'article Rodolphe Cattin (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodolphe_Cattin). Les illustrations sont libres de droit et tirées des dossiers de presse de la marque Rodolphe. Que dois-je faire pour le prouver?

Par ailleurs, est-ce vous qui avez apposé les divers bandeaux sur la page ? Notamment sur l'admissibilité et le caractère orphelin. J'en discuterais volontiers avec vous.

Bien cordialement

Tripack7

@Tripack7:

Bonjour,

Pour les images, il faut que le détenteur des droits envoie un mail d'autorisation. Vous trouverez la procédure et le mail type de consentement à ce lien: Commons:OTRS/fr. --Shev123 (talk) 21:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

@Shev123

Contact a été pris avec Rodolphe Cattin, propriétaire des droits de ces images qui faisaient partie du dossier de presse sur CD. Il a envoyé ce jours un mail type à l'adresse de commons. En espérant que cela va comme cela.

Sinon, je souhaiterais discuter des bandeaux mis sur la page. Est-ce vous?

Avec mes cordiaux messages P.

Bonjour,

J'ai en effet mis certains bandeaux. En l'état, il s'agit d'une page de pub et aucun élément ne démontre d'une quelconque notoriété.--Shev123 (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@shev123 Bonjour, Merci pour votre réponse. Je m'étonne que vous mettiez en doute la notoriété de M. Cattin. Avez-vous pris un peu de temps pour parcourir les 32 sources secondaires en référence qui témoignent du parcours professionnel de ce Monsieur?

Par ailleurs, il n'y a pas d'aspect publicitaire pour cette page biographique d'une personne qui a marqué le design horloger des dernières décennies. Elle relate avec honnêteté la carrière professionnelle, en évoquant tant les succès que les échecs.

Enfin, vous sous-entendez un conflit d'intérêt de ma part. Or, étant un amateur d'horlogerie, je connais personnellement M. Cattin et c'est dans cet esprit que j'ai réalisé cette page qui le concerne, sans recevoir aucun avantage en retour.

J'espère que mes arguments sauront vous convaincre.

Cordialement

P.

Nouvelle licence pour une image

Bonjour Shev123 ! Et merci pour votre intervention à propos de la licence de l'image ci-contre. J'étais justement en train de me demander si je n'avais pas été trop naïf en accordant la licence Creative Commons à ces deux images. Heureusement que vous êtes là ! Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Jourdan Thibodeaux.jpg

Hello.

I thought that choosing the photo File:Jourdan Thibodeaux.jpg of this person from his personal Facebook page was permissible under certain copyright laws. Obviously, I was wrong about this and I have to learn more about copyright laws.

Since I don't know this person, let alone have his e-mail or any other contact, then this file should be erased.

Are uploads from Flickr permissible, since people uploading there, release their personal photos and other photos to the public domain under a free license? (For example, this person has a lot of photos there, but were released by other people.)

Yours sincerely, Sondrion (talk) 09:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

@Sondrion:

Hello,

For Flickr, I check and there is no images compatible with Commons (filter with commercial use). --Shev123 (talk) 10:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Schopenhauer - Le Fondement de la morale, trad. Burdeau, 1879.djvu

File:Schopenhauer - Le Fondement de la morale, trad. Burdeau, 1879.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hsarrazin (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Problematic automatic(?) templating

Hello! Just for yuor information, this edit was probably a mistake. The image haven't been "posted on an external website" (at least not at the date of the upload): the description explicitely stated that the source was the office of J.E. (by email, though it's not explicitly stated, but kind of logical). Maybe this have happened to other images, too, and it'd be a shame if other editors would delete images based on mistakenly inserted templates. Thanks! -- grin ✎ 16:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

@Grin:

Hi,

I saw this image and I was going to add "missing permission" (no VRT tickets and it is not enough to say I have an autorization). Then, I noticed that you are an admin and I only put the licence review tag. I was nice because it was an upload of 2015. Pbrks was totally right to ask the image to deletion. --Shev123 (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Well it was happy end, but still, the image contained all the sourcing information pretty detailed, don't you think? And why now, and not in 2015? I often wonder how people pick years and years old images to flag and expect uploaders to remember what was 7 years and thousands of uploads before. grin ✎ 14:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Grin:

Hi,

People on Commons are always asking for more. Some of my uploads were deleted because I didn't send VRT email even if I had an autorization... So now, I am following the rules (I don't know if t is written somewhere). The page about Johan Eliasch was created in 2021 on french wikipedia and I only saw this image at that moment. --Shev123 (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately the warning templates are always disturbing, I have learned a long time ago that a personal friendly message works way better. Nevertheless, I honestly thank you for your help and your energy to prevent the image from falling prey to the deletionists. :-) Have a nice day! grin ✎ 11:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Chezmarcel

Bonjour, l'utilisateur Chezmarcel vient d'être bloqué sur le wiki fr pour défaut de l'obligation de transparence. Je vois qu'il fait exactement la même chose sur Commons, que je connais peu par rapport au wiki fr, et je me demande quelle est l'usage ici. Je n'ai rien trouvé de spécifique en dehors de l'un de vos messages qui demande à quelqu'un de publier ses COI. Vous avez des infos ou des liens ou je pourrais en apprendre plus ? Bonne journée. Irwc (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

@Irwc:

Bonjour,

Il y a plusieurs choses que l'on peut faire :

• s'il y a des doutes sur la "légalité" des images. Est-ce que le compte est réellement l'auteur des images ? Est-ce que le photographe a donné son accord ? En cas de doute, on peut lancer un débat en suppression d'une ou des images.
• Il est possible de bloquer un compte sur tous les projets Wikimédia voir ici. Je connais peu cette procédure mais User:Bédévore (admin sur le wiki francophone) maîtrise ce sujet. --Shev123 (talk) 11:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Usage de la jaquette d'un album de musique

Bonjour, j'ai versé la jaquette d'un album de musique : Jacquette de l'album Les Voyageurs de l'Espace.jpg, et ne comprends pas très bien pourquoi elle serait supprimée. Comme les couvertures de livres, les jaquettes d'album sont dans le domaine public et peuvent donc être publiées partout sans problème. Faudrait-il modifier la licence ? Merci par avance pour votre réponse. BarnabyAusten (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

@BarnabyAusten:

Bonjour,

Les pochettes d'albums ou les couvertures de livres ne sont pas dans le domaine public. Il faut donc une autorisation de l'auteur. --Shev123 (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour, il me semblait que dès lors que l'utilisation n'était pas faite à visée commerciale, il était admis qu'on pouvait publier ces images. Je me suis donc trompée et en suis désolée. Puis-je prendre une photo de l'album, posé sur une table par exemple ? BarnabyAusten (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

@BarnabyAusten:

Bonjour,

Le fair use n'est pas autorisé sur Commons. Voir Commons:Fair use et Commons:De minimis. A mon avis, dans tous les cas, ce n'est pas possible d'importer l'image sur Commons. --Shev123 (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Expo Louis de Funès à Paris - 19.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Expo Louis de Funès à Paris - 19.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

— Racconish ^💬 15:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Expo Louis de Funès à Paris - 13.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Expo Louis de Funès à Paris - 13.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

— Racconish ^💬 16:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Acharnement

Bonjour,

Pourquoi s'acharner à défaire mon travail, alors que je fais tout pour aller dans votre sens et tient compte de toutes vos remarques? Cette fois c'est abusif je demande réparation. L'article Michel Rein n'est pas orphelin. Les photos de l'article Galerie Michel Rein n'ont jamais fait l'objet d'une violation de copyright puisque j'ai acheté les droits aux deux photographes. Elles ont de plus été supprimées sans mon consentement avant ue j'ai eu le temps de m'exprimer sur la question. Merci

Photo Marc Billon

La photo que vous avez supprimé est un cliché de Corinne Vigne-Loup. Elle a été prise le Dimanche 19 Juin 2011, jour du concert électroacoustique de musique immersive organisé par la galerie synesthésie à Saint- Denis et le festival Futur en Seine à la Chapelle des Carmélites du Musée d'Art et d'histoire de la ville de Saint Denis. Cet événement est intervenu dans le cadre de l’exposition LMQTP (Le Mai Qui Te Plaît) et du festival Futur en Seine 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minustwo (talk • contribs) 09:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Elena_Montesinos.jpg (public licensing)

Hello Shev123,

Thanks for your Work !

I have sent today the following additional information to : permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

about the licensing of the following image that you have tagged  : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Elena_Montesinos.jpg

1) You will find the "public copyright license" mentioned under the photo here : https://themontesinosfoundation.org/about (source) for the picture 2) the photo is a self-portrait by the artist who ownes therefore all right of use

3) This message was sent via the following address : hello@themontesinosfoundation.org wich is the official e-mail address of the artist as mentioned on its web site here : https://themontesinosfoundation.org/about

Hope this is OK ? Thanks in advance

Yours kindly

Elena Montesinos (artist) Julien Amey (webmaster for Elena Montesinos)

---

Forwarded message ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

De : Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Date: dim. 5 avr. 2020 à 15:56 Subject: Re: [Ticket#2020040510003728] Photo Permission Email Elena_Montesinos.jpg To: Julien Amey <julienmarcelamey@gmail.com>

Dear Julien Amey,

Thank you for your email. There are few problems with the permission, however.

1. I could not find the legal text of the "public copyright license" mentioned on the https://themontesinosfoundation.org/about-2 page; however it is irrelevant if a proper license from the copyright holder is sent via email.

2. Are you the photographer who made this photo or the person depicted? As the default copyright holder is the photographer, if the permission is send by somebody else than the photographer, we need an evidence that copyright has been transferred to the actual copyright holder by a contract or by operation of law.

3. As anybody can create an arbitrary gmail.com email address, we can accept permissions sent from such addresses ONLY if the address is mentioned on the copyright holder's site as one of the contact addresses. I can't find this email in the https://themontesinosfoundation.org/ website, however.

Yours sincerely, Andrzej Kamil Rybicki

-- Wikimedia Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/ --- Disclaimer: all mail to this address is answered by volunteers, and responses are not to be considered an official statement of the Wikimedia Foundation. For official correspondence, please contact the Wikimedia Foundation by certified mail at the address listed on https://www.wikimediafoundation.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMA363 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Questions about pictures removal

Hello Shev123 , I hope you're well. I noticed that some of the pictures I have recently uploaded to the Wiki Commons have been deleted. I believe I had followed all the proper steps and guidelines. Can I know why they have been removed, as I am the author of those pictures, therefore have all the rights on them? I would love for you to help me with this. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanie.bujold (talk • contribs) 13:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Gabriel Batistuta en interview avec Florent Torchut.jpg

Dear Shev 123,

A permission has been added to the file page: File:Gabriel Batistuta en interview avec Florent Torchut.jpg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gabriel_Batistuta_en_interview_avec_Florent_Torchut.jpg)

Could you please remove your disclaimer, so that this photo is not deleted from Wikimedia Commons?

Thank you!