User talk:Septembermorgen
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Orgullomoore 20:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --- Done. Just forgot to add the license.Septembermorgen 08:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
You always have to mention the author of a picture, if you created it yourself just say so (e.g. with the {{GFDL-self}} template). You also have to say so if you used an image of someone else. Please help to resolve that problem, otherwise these pictures have to be deleted. Thank you. -- Gorgo 01:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Isn´t the author (OpenGeoDB) mentioned in the OpenGeoDB-license box? Do I have to add further information about source and author? Septembermorgen 20:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- where? you mean "This image was generated with http://opengeodb.hoppe-media.com/." A program can't be the author ;), so who created these images? But anyways, if I remember correctly there was a way to superimpose a dot onto the map just using html-code, this would probably be easier. -- Gorgo 23:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hello Gorgo, Please have a look on [1], I added the required information to this file. When this is OK, I will add the same box to all other files I contributed. Septembermorgen 09:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- thanks for your effort but I guess that would be too much in this case. I realized that this is more a problem with the opengeodb template beeing not that clear. I guess it would be enough if it gets changed to something like "this image was generated by opengeodb, all images generated by this project are gfdl" .. but after looking at that page I'm not that sure, if that's true .. where do they have some license on their page? -- Gorgo 20:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe it will reduce your concerns when you have a look here [2]. Septembermorgen 18:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- I changed {{GFDL-OpenGeoDB}} accordingly, please have a look. I hope it's better now. -- Gorgo 17:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hope this will be sufficient. Septembermorgen 17:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- I changed {{GFDL-OpenGeoDB}} accordingly, please have a look. I hope it's better now. -- Gorgo 17:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe it will reduce your concerns when you have a look here [2]. Septembermorgen 18:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- thanks for your effort but I guess that would be too much in this case. I realized that this is more a problem with the opengeodb template beeing not that clear. I guess it would be enough if it gets changed to something like "this image was generated by opengeodb, all images generated by this project are gfdl" .. but after looking at that page I'm not that sure, if that's true .. where do they have some license on their page? -- Gorgo 20:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hello Gorgo, Please have a look on [1], I added the required information to this file. When this is OK, I will add the same box to all other files I contributed. Septembermorgen 09:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- where? you mean "This image was generated with http://opengeodb.hoppe-media.com/." A program can't be the author ;), so who created these images? But anyways, if I remember correctly there was a way to superimpose a dot onto the map just using html-code, this would probably be easier. -- Gorgo 23:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Schmitt (Eifel).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 08:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Png format
[edit]Image:Ph Positionskarte.PNG format is not 100% complaint. Which program did you use to create it? Platonides 15:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Corel PhotoPaint10. --Septembermorgen 15:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
File:Ph seal agusan del norte.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Bluemask (talk) 05:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Fair use
[edit]Hello,
I noticed that you moved a lot of signs from the En.wiki to Commons, Thanks for that but we have a little problem with it.
On En.wiki the where license under Fair use, and Commons doesn't accept fair use so we had to delete them all. I am sure you didn't know about that so I will not place a warning :) Could you please check it in the future before moving to Commons, it makes a lot people work hard to get it cleaned.
If you have any quistions or need help, please contact me on my talk page. Abigor talk 13:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- According to Philippine Copyright Law [3] CHAPTER IV WORKS NOT PROTECTED, these seals are public domain, so far it is pretty uninteresting, which license tag they got in en. Maybe this link (project discussion page on copyright affairs in de:WP) might be also interesting for you [4]. Nice greetings --Septembermorgen (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Rohrbach bei Mattersburg im Bezirk MA.png was uncategorized on 3 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token b8fac40df476cfcc59bdd83d4d476b19
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Kösen
[edit]Moin Septembermorgen, sehe Deine Gewaltaktion vor dem 1. Januar mit gewisser Skepsis: Auch in anderen Städten und Gemeinden gibt es mühsam angelegte Unterkategorien für Ortsteile. Da Kösen als Ort nach wie vor separat liegt, ist die völlige Auflösung der Kösener Artikelkategorien bei bei Commons eher eine Art der Informationsvernichtung. Beispiel: In Lübeck gibt es auch eine eigene Kategorie für Travemünde, das als Seebad ein paar Kilometer ab liegt. Gruß! --Kresspahl (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hier auf Commons ist es wohl so, dass die Kategorien ehemaliger Gemeinden als Unterkategorien der aufnehmenden Gemeinde weitergeführt werden. Ich habe meine Änderungen daher rückgängig gemacht und passe die Kategorie:Bad Kösen in die Kategorie:Naumburg (Saale) ein. Gruß --Septembermorgen (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Dank Dir! ich war da als Wanderer zwischen den Welten auch etwas durcheinander gekommen. Frohes Fest!--Kresspahl (talk) 12:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_davao_del_norte.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bluemask (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_davao_del_sur.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bluemask (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_dinagat_islands.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bluemask (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_capiz.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bluemask (talk) 05:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_sorsogon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Checking bot moves
[edit]Before removing the {{BotMoveToCommons}} template from bot uploads, please ensure that you have actually followed the steps listed in Commons:Moving to Commons#Check the image. In the case of File:Charlotte Dorothea Overbeck.jpg, you clearly skipped step 4: Set proper categories. The file incorrectly identified the female subject as a male physician and member of the Order of the Dannebrog who lived between 1778 and 1846 (rather than between 1790 and 1872). It also contained a number of other categories which were not applicable, which constituted over-categorization, or which did not even exist. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hello LX, usually I check the automated categorization of FileUploadBot. Regards --Septembermorgen (talk) 16:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, good! :) —LX (talk, contribs) 16:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_guimaras.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_zamboanga_sibugay.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_zamboanga_del_sur.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:28, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_tawi-tawi.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Ph_seal_sultan_kudarat.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ph seal nueva ecija.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal nueva ecija.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Bluemask (talk) 05:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Albrecht von Brandenburg Preußen.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Albrecht von Brandenburg Preußen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Albrecht von Brandenburg Preußen.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Stefan4 (talk) 19:31, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Message
[edit]Hello, Septembermorgen. You have new messages on another wiki at [[File talk:Seal of Karnataka.png#{{{2}}}]].
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Just to bring to your attention. TIA. Rahul Bott (talk) 08:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
File:1717 Denkmuenze 200J Reformation Luther&Palme W.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
File:AdamFriedrichOeser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rettinghaus (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
File:20020414 pavoni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Discasto talk 10:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
File:1462 Christine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File:1332 Rougé.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Annaspanien.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ecummenic (talk) 07:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 12:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)