User talk:Robert Schediwy
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:SantPauInterior2.jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2009.
- Image:ForoItAt2.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2009.
- Image:ForoItAt1.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2009.
- Image:OrtaVillaCrespi.jpg was uncategorized on 21 October 2009.
- Image:Bandlkraamer2-Gro0-Siegharts.JPG was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 20:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bandlkramer1-Groß-Siegharts.JPG was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 20:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Maturatreffen1975c.jpg was uncategorized on 15 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 02:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Treffen 2011-11-10A.jpg was uncategorized on 17 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Automatenfoto.jpg was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Wallern2 Lindhof, Wallern, Upper Austria, facade facing park. Built after 2000.jpg was uncategorized on 13 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kautskykreis2000-1.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Kaautskykreis2000-3.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:18, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded two doctored files to the category. Please note that all files need author's name. Not yours, the original artist. All we know is the print shop name in the bottom. At any rate, PD-self licence is incorrect, must be PD-100 or something. Could be PD-Art, however, the new file are too doctored to be considered "faithful reproduction".
Also, it's impossible to judge the proportions when the image is so slanted. It could be taller or flatter, I just guessed. NVO (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice (I'm going to fix that) - but I couldn't find your two doctored files in the category!
- Changing subject: I see you have been uploading a great number of excellent pictures on Moscow. I am looking for material on the Austro-Russian architect August Weber who is said to have built a lot in Moscow. Can you possibly create a category in his name and with his work?
- Greetings and thanks! --Robert Schediwy (talk) 08:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Response on Weber on my talk page. NVO (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Magdalenengrund3.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Magdalenengrund3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 21:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- The copyright of this image has expired in the European Union because it was published more than 70 years ago without a public claim of authorship (anonymous or pseudonymous), and no subsequent claim of authorship was made in the 70 years following its first publication.
--Robert Schediwy (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
PRENN (talk) 09:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
File:ForoItFarnesina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
File:EURCol.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
For your scanned photos of vintage czech cars, which I found very useful indeed. Thank you, RomanM82 (talk) 22:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC) |
File:WienutopieFestwochen2010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
darkweasel94 22:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Soweit ich weiß, wird die Panoramafreiheit in Österreich etwas extensiver interpretiert als in Deutschland. Außerdem ließe sich argumentieren, dass die Behinderung der bildlichen wissenschaftlichen Dokumentation sozialer Veränderungen das Grundrecht auf Freiheit der Wissenschaft beeinträchtigt. Man dürfte dann ja z.B. als Politologe oder Soziologe auch keine Wahlplakate frei dokumentieren sondern erst 70 Jahre nach dem Tod ihrer jeweiligen Schöpfer. Gleiches müsste für Geschäftsauslagen gelten, die ja auch periodisch erneuert werden. Hier streift die gesatzte Norm ans Absurde. Rechtspolitisch betrachtet, befinden sich daher viele Bestimmmungen des Urheberrechts auf dem Weg der desuetudo, werden aber andererseits verzweifelt von einzelnen Begünstigten für sich reklamiert. Das ist eine Situation vergleichbar dem Versuch der Reaktivierung gewisser ständischer Privilegien im vorrevolutionären Frankreich des Ancien Régime.
Man sollte in einer solchen Situation nicht unbedingt Fleißaufgaben machen. Das besagte Plakat war über längere Zeit Teil eines Bauwerks (einer Bushaltestelle) und dokumentiert eine bestimmte Geisteshaltung (Werbung einer Kulturinstitution durch Provokation). Der Oberste Gerichtshof hat mehrmals präzisiert: Bauwerke müssen sich im Gegensatz zu anderen Werken der bildenden Künste weder an einem dem öffentlichen Verkehr dienenden Ort befinden, noch ist ihre Abbildung auf die Außenansicht beschränkt (OGH 4 Ob106/89). Hier liegt aber sogar eine Außenansicht vor.
Ich ersuche aus den genannten Gründen darum, nicht päpstlicher als der Papst zu agieren--Robert Schediwy (talk) 23:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)ergänzt --Robert Schediwy (talk) 10:50, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Carl Ludwig Hoffmeister Fedinandsbrücke Wien 1825 - Detail.jpg
[edit]{{Autotranslate|1=File:Carl Ludwig Hoffmeister Fedinandsbrücke Wien 1825 - Detail.jpg|base=Image license}} No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- It was just a typo in the license. I fixed it now. --Jarekt (talk) 14:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot!--Robert Schediwy (talk) 09:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Deine Fotos der Seestadt Aspern
[edit]z.B. File:Seestadt_Aspern._A_stroll_1.JPG, sind mit Datum 2004 (=Aufnahmedatum) markiert. Da gab es allerdings noch keine Seestadt. Vielleicht magst du das Aufnahmedatum (und deine Kamera?) näherungsweise richtig stellen? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate, not own work
[edit]Hallo Robert, da ist dir was passiert. Es braucht keine hinunterskalierten Kleinbilder. Außerdem ist das nicht own work, wenn du Bilder anderer unter eigenem Namen hochlädst.
-
Original
-
Kopie
-
Original
-
Kopie
-
Original
-
Kopie
Ich stoße dann mal die Löschung als Duplikate an. Wenn du noch andere Paare dieser Art kennst, tue es mir gleich … lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Vielen Dank!
[edit]Ich habe mir offenbar diese Bilder von einem Stick geholt, wo ich Aufstockungss- bzw.Hochhausbilder vom Ringstraßenbereich gesammelt habe und ich hatte die dort umbenannt, damit sie in die richtige Reihenfolge passen. Daher wusste ich dann nicht mehr genau, was von mir ist und was nicht. Nochmals Dank - ich will natürlich niemandem etwas wegnehmen! Gruß!--Robert Schediwy (talk) 08:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC) P.S.:Ich wollte die drei Fotos auf kurzem Weg löschen - aber wie geht denn das`? Sorry, wikitechnisch bin ich ein "Hiafler"...
Bilder von Dresden
[edit]Hallo, du hast Bilder von Dresden hochgeladen. Konkret meine ich folgende:
Kannst du mir einen Tipp geben, in welcher Ecke von Dresden du die Bilder aufgenommen hast? Dann könnte ich sie besser in den Kategorien von Dresden einsortieren. Besten Dank und Frohe Weihnachten. -- sk (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ehrlich gesagt:Ich habe keine Ahnung mehr. Das war ja vor etwa 40 Jahren. Ich tippe auf Dresden Neustadt, wegen der relativ geringen Kriegs-Zerstörung oder die Gegend umd das "blaue Wunder". Frohe Festtage auch Dir!--Robert Schediwy (talk) 10:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 07:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Bild der Schmelz, gibt es einen Scan des ganzen Ölgemäldes?
[edit]Sehr geehrter Herr Robert Schediwy, leider konnte ich keine andere Kontaktmöglichkeit im Internet finden, daher schreibe ich ihnen auf diesem Wege. In Ihrem Buch "Grün in der Großstadt: Geschichte und Zukunft europäischer Parkanlagen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Wiens", gibt es ein Ölgemälde auf dem die Radetzky-Kaserne (an der Schmelz) zu sehen ist. Im Internet finde ich nur Ausschnitte. Hätten sie eventuell einen Scan auf dem das gesamte Bild zu sehen ist? Beziehungsweise wissen Sie wo Ihr Buch noch erhältlich ist? Ich habe gesehen dass der Edition Tusch Verlag leider nicht mehr existiert.
Vielen lieben Dank, Johannes Traun
- Schönen Tag!
Ich glaube, wir hatten das Bild damals aus dem Wien-Museum. Großes Kunstwerk ist es ja keines, aber es hat uns damals leid getan, es wegen seines ungewöhnlichen Formats beschneiden zu müseen. Das Buch msollte antiquarisch über Amazon billig zu haben sein. Ich habe leider kein Exemplar mehr zur Verfügumg Herzlichst
Robert SChediwy
File:SchlossPötzleinsdorf after 1918.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 18:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Samoan license plate.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
File:CarrédArt.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
File:HavanaAntiUSBillboard2002Schediwy.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |