User talk:Przykuta/archive

Pierwsze kroki - poradnik Nasz poradnik pierwsze kroki i nasze FAQ bardzo Ci pomogą po rejestracji. Wyjaśnią Ci jak dostosować interfejs (np. język), jak załadować pliki, wyjaśnią podstawowe zasady licencjonowania. Nie musisz posiadać technicznych umiejętności by wnieść swój wkład. Śmiało wnoś swój wkład i pokładaj wiarę w dobre intencje innych. To wiki - to jest na prawdę proste. Uzyskanie pomocy Więcej informacji dostępnych jest na Portalu wikipedystów. Możesz zadawać pytania na Help desk, w Barze lub na kanale IRC - #wikipedia-pl. Możesz także skontaktować się z administratorem na jego stronie dyskusji. Jeśli masz określone pytanie o prawa autorskie, spytaj na Commons talk:Licensing.		Dodatki, rady i triki Wstaw tabelę Babel na swą stronę użytkownika by inni wiedzieli w jakich językach mówisz Wszystkie Twoje edycje przechowywane są w Twojej osobistej Galerii Proszę podpisuj się na stronach rozmowy pisząc ~~~~ Używaj narzędzia CommonSense by znaleźć dobre kategorie dla Twoich plików (wtedy także i inni je odnajdą!) Aby stworzyć link do strony z grafiką, wpisz: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], co da: Image:Foo.jpg Jeśli kopiujesz pliki z innego projektu, upewnij się, że użyłeś CommonsHelper Popełniłeś błąd? Chcesz usunąć lub przenieść plik? Po prostu załaduj plik ponownie i oznacz stary w ten sposób: {{bad name|Poprawna nazwa}} Więcej informacji uzyskasz czytając Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Czy chciałbyś dać odpowiedź zwrotną na tę wiadomość?)

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Numer gg

Witam,

Cieszę się, że nareszcie znalazłem użytkownika z Polski który też jest aktywny na Commons. Ja tu już byłem przez prawie dwa lata. Jeśli byś mi podał twój numer gadu-gadu, to chętnie bym na temat Commons porozmawiał. :D Freedom to share 21:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC) (Jeśli nie chcesz tu wyświetlić, to możesz mi mailem wysłać. Musimy trochę porozmawiać o Commons, Polakach i national voting.)

Not sure what Poland has to do with it

Witam,

Najpierw chciałbym cię przeprosić, gdyby moje komentarze się wydawałyby anty-Polskie. Też jestem Polakiem, kocham ojczyznę, i zauważyłem, że często Polacy są krytykowani na Commons, szczególnie w Featured Picture Candidates. Niestety często się pojawiają komentarze takie jak 'typical polish sponsored support', ponieważ wiele uważa, że Polacy tutaj zawarli koalicję czy coś w tym rodzaju :D i tylko głosują 'Support' jak Polak wstawia jakieś zdjęcie, szczególnie jeśli tematyka jest związana z Polską. Problem polega na koncepcie 'national voting', czyli głosowania narodowego, z którym prawie nikt tu się nie zgadza. Próbowałem wytłumaczyć, że ten fenomen nie istnieje i że głosowałem, ponieważ mi się zdjęcie podobało. Poproszę o odpowiedź zwrotną.

-- Freedom to share 18:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Прэзыдэнцкія выбары ў Беларусі

Can you get any photos from political propaganda in Belarus? I think about Lukaszenka's and opposition's propaganda too. Or - if it is not too dangerous - photos of street actions (mass manifestations or others) Przykuta 00:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I can't help you myself, but I put messages with your request to Belarusian and Russian Wikipedias forums. As for now you could use Image:Agitation stand.JPG. --EugeneZelenko 04:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

There are 2 more election related photos in Category:Politics of Belarus.

I saw some photos on Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/by/). Several other photoalbums was mentioned in http://community.livejournal.com/minsk_by і http://community.livejournal.com/minsk_news. I could not find e-mails to contact the authors for asking them to re-license images under CC-BY-SA (or other license), but you could try if you have LJ or Flickr accounts.

EugeneZelenko 15:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kapliczka Kulisza1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kapliczka Kulisza1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 19:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Grafiki

Witaj. Proszę, jak ładujesz grafiki na Commons do wpisuj zawsze kategorię. Obecnie większość miast w województwa śląskiego ma utworzone kategorie, więc nie trzeba ich tworzyć. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL 14:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Major Oak

Thank you for your question. I actually didn't remember the name of the tree. But now I just compared the photo with this and with the photo of w:en:Major Oak, and, as you can see, my photo is also the Major Oak. I will write it on the description page. --Javier Carro 16:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

:)

Of course, you are welcome to write at the English Village pump!! I just wanted to let you know that the Polish one exists. I wasn't sure if you already knew or not.

Multilinguality is a big problem for the Commons... we are always aware of this and trying to make it better. But we are limited by the software. Even User:Duesentrieb wrote some excellent patches that use interwiki links to provide some kind of "translation", but they haven't been implemented yet. So we keep trying. We always welcome new ideas, if you have some.

cheers :) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Atlas:

Hi Przykuta (man, and people say my username is hard to pronounce! ;)),

I think it is an interesting idea, but it does seem to work best in support of other projects (wikipedia or commons), rather than as its own project.

It is possible that Commons can have many more different types of pages and galleries than we currently have. There's no mandate or rule that we can only have the one type. I don't think a separate namespace is necessary, but we could possibly ask the dev's to put one in if it proves popular.

I suggest you start making the pages that you are interested in. Put them in a special category or put a special template on them that shows they are something different. like Category:Wikialbums. Explain on the category page what you're trying to do. (Also put pages in categories that describe their content, of course!)

If it catches on, maybe it will be worth considering to a separate space or separate project. But until there is actually content to talk about, it is a little hard to say anything definite about it.

In general I find the wikicommunity is not destructive for no reason, so just try something new and go for it. You have nothing to lose! :) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

You can use a "fake" namespace if you like - Album:Cars. I think "album" is maybe better because it's a broader concept than "atlas" (which is just geography, isn't it?). pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Xerocomus chrysenteron 7840.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerocomus chrysenteron 7840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 18:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

What does this machine do?

Produces or processes what?

Greetings: Can you tell me what this does? Please message to my english WP account en:User talk:Leonard G. - Thanks

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euthrix potatoria corect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 12:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

POTY

The only publications I have found are those I've mentioned on the talk page. If you need help writing something like a press release, you could ask help from pfctdayelise who has written most of Commons:Press releases. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

re: Commons:Press releases

Hi Przykuta,

100k galleries is a while off, I think. Also, many of our galleries are of poor quality - few images, just the same as the category, no explanation of the topic. So I wouldn't be in a hurry to promote our galleries. :)

It looks like 2M uploads will be coming extremely soon. This could be a good chance to highlight the quick growth of Commons. Since the 1M uploads there have also been several technical improvements, like Mayflower search engine, geotagging interface with Google Earth.Maps, RSS feeds, improved audio/video playback, interface with Flickr. That's quite a lot, really. :) Shall we prepare a 2M upload press release?

1000FP (Features pictures) is also coming up, I think 2M uploads will come first though.

As for Polish projects... we have actually a very large number of Polish admins, and generally a pretty active Polish community. In fact native Polish speakers are the third largest group of admins at Commons, after native English speakers and native German speakers (ahead of French and Spanish!). In my experience plwiki has enthusiastically embraced the Commons vision which is very happy for us. :)

User:Ejdzej is extremely active, mostly with administration things I think, but he might be able to tell you things that are going on. User:WarX is another very active admin, and also has done a lot of work with SVGs, with some FPs such as Image:Oil well scheme.svg (not a very exciting one. maybe he can tell you the other ones).

Is there something specific you want to know about "the Commons community"?

cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

We actually did some work on it, but the idea hasn't really caught on: Commons talk:Featured galleries. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 00:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fagus_sylvatica_leaf_2P.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

PL QI

OK, ale tych co oceniłem nie będę cofał... --Lestat 17:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bighornbattle1 pl.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

SVG maps

i want you to know that i did saw you trying to upload the scg version of the maps, but right now there is a discussion in what is needed to accept maps as QI. so please wait until thye subject is clear before posting more maps. since we dont want to make you work extra for something we have not yet desided -LadyofHats 09:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marine Fog Pattern 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euthrix potatoria corect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Monte Rosa Hut 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rossoszyca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Chmury warstwy.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chmury warstwy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botanical garden Krakow (2006-05-13) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skrzek 2006-05-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyles euphorbiae004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melanargia galathea-polowiec szachownica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieris napi(Bielinek bytomkowiec).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brenna2 kapliczka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of St Simeon Stylites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kathedrale Bourges v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostoja herb.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! POL województwo płockie COA.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! POL województwo czernihowskie COA IRP.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! POL COA Trzaska.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of the British Antarctic Territory.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linie-pisma.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lipid raft organisation scheme.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image out of focus

Hello, I saw that your image hadn't been reviewed yet, and so I looked it over. Unfortunately, even though it is an interesting image, it is too out of focus, in my opinion.--Skoch3 03:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Sorry, was talking about the Euproctis similis picture on July 4 --Skoch3 01:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Setter R 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Music by year

Hello. I am proposing standardizing the music by year categories in the format "Music in [year]". If you wish to comment or discuss, please do so at Category talk:2007 in music. Thank you, Infrogmation 16:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wikipedysta_Radomil_z_brodą_2006.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Wikipedysta_Radomil_z_brodą_2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

OsamaK 23:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Artur Rojek Off Festival p 068 crop.jpg

No problem. By the way, I believe you can vote for the edit at QI, since it appears I am being counted as its nominator. Thegreenj 22:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

grafika z łapkami :-)

cze, pytałeś w BARze czy ktoś nie widział grafiki z uściskiem dłoni. Nie wiem czy to aktualne, bo nie często tu zaglądam, ale znalazłam coś takiego: Image:Ruzgar-deneme-yönetici4.png - na przezroczystym tle, może ci się nada.

I po drugie. Gdzie mamy zgłaszać błędy na mapach ? Generalnie zmienił się podział województw w 2004 (czyli 5 lat po oficjalnym podziale administracyjnym w 1999 roku) - chodzi mi o zmianę dwóch solectw (Piekiełko i Krajewo) z woj. warmińsko-mazurskiego (gmina Iłowo-Osada), które przeszły na stronę mazowiecką i stały się częścią Mławy. Niestety mało która mapa odzwierciedla tę zmianę - nawet te oficjalne, które wiszą przed urzędem gmimy. --Beax 13:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: FP, sunsets etc.

Ah, I see. Thank you very much for explaining that to me. I've been neglecting Wikipedia lately (too much time on Commons :-) but I'll be sure to try and use more FPs. Good luck with your project! Cheers, Rocket000 21:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:POL COA Trzaska.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:POL COA Trzaska.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 21:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skottehytta-070820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

re: Featured Illustrations

Hi Przykuta, thanks for your message.

I am not totally clear on what you mean. When you say "illustration" do you mean in a general sense, including (e.g.) photographs, or in a more specific sense, like diagrams?

Sometimes FP has excellent Q, but nothing more. - what does this mean? What is "Q"?

If you are proposing to make it easier or encourage more Wikimedia projects to use Commons FPs, I think it is a very good idea. It would be cool if there was a tool where you could put in your project (eg pl.wikipedia) and based on interwiki links it would show which FP images weren't used there and suggest articles to put them on.

explain your idea to me a little bit more and we'll see what we can come up with...

cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Illustrate Paradise? ;) In truth, I know many of the sunsets are not great for encyclopedias, but to be honest many of them were nominated some time ago, these days it is much harder for a sunset to be accepted. But I am not sure what you think we should or could do about it? We're hardly going to delete them. :)

It could be a good idea to encourage FPC nominators to make sure the description is complete, so it is easier to use in Wikipedia...

--pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I think I understand... you think Featured Illustrations would be for images that illustrate some article or concept well?

To be honest I don't think this proposal would succeed, because this is kind of what "Featured Pictures" on Wikipedias (English Wikipedia, at least) does. They strongly prefer images that "Adds value to an article and helps readers to understand an article. An image's encyclopedic value is given priority over its artistic value" (see Wikipedia:Featured picture criteria).

I see there is pl:Wikipedia:Grafika na medal - propozycje... they don't have this kind of criteria about usefulness?

cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed this thread, and I would like to bring to your attention that we have a new project in its infancy called Valued Images. The proposal is being discussed here. The general idea with this project is to identify and promote images which are the optimized for their value and usefulness for display in online content in WMF projects. It puts less emphasis on the technical qualities. It is hoped that it can stimulate contributions of a wide diversity of subjects, thus being of more general use in WMF projects than the FPs. Currently the draft guideline is being stress tested with some examples in a test vote. I feel your input could be valuable in this context. Feel free to join that discussion and vote on the test images as well as adding further test images. -- Slaunger 13:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: PR

Oh that's great :) -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

zdjęcia z Sanoka

re: W skansenie jest mała galeria tzw. ikony karpackiej, niestety kiedy byłem w ostatni weekend była zamknięta. Na zaś będę pamiętał żeby zajrzeć .

Image Tagging Image:Boronów_mapa_XIX_wiek.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Boronów_mapa_XIX_wiek.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 08:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nová Kelča kostol sv. Štefana kráľa 17.08.08 pl2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition Albertus teolog 12:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medzilaborce Andy 18.08.08 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality Albertus teolog 12:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medzilaborce cerkiew 20.08.08 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective and colors Albertus teolog 11:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasny Brad kościół (budowany) 20.08.08 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good colours, sharp --Mbdortmund 07:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirow ostaniec 12.08.08 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 19:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szczekociny zespol palacowy fragment 12. 08.08 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable quality --Massimo Catarinella 16:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ZamekMirowiePoland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Gratulacje

Tym razem gratuluję żółtego słoneczka. Albertus teolog (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woźniki kościół św. Walentego p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Berthold Werner 12:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Przykuta!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Wikipedyści Rabka cropped.jpg is uncategorized since 1 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Masti GDJ 2009 Lisarlena cropped.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2009.
• Image:Krok 1 zielony2.png was uncategorized on 13 October 2009.
• Image:Polimerek GDJ 2009 Lisarlena mod.png was uncategorized on 18 October 2009.
• Image:Boronów kościół i cmentarz 2009 p.jpg was uncategorized on 25 October 2009.
• Image:Status haseł w pl wiki wg źródeł.png was uncategorized on 1 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Smolnica kościół Bartłomieja 21.09.09 p.jpg was uncategorized on 5 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
• Image:WIKI RPG napis.png was uncategorized on 9 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Czernica gmina Gaszowice dawny kościół 2011 p2.jpg was uncategorized on 22 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Czernica gmina Gaszowice kościół NMP Królowej Polski 2011 p.jpg was uncategorized on 22 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Czernica gmina Gaszowice dawny kościół 2011 p.jpg was uncategorized on 22 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Czernica gmina Gaszowice kościół NMP Królowej Polski 2011 2p.jpg was uncategorized on 22 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Czernica gmina Gaszowice dawny kościół 2011 p3.jpg was uncategorized on 22 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

License change marked

Regards. --Dodo (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Fotka okładki Kroniki skasowana

Hej, możesz sprawdzić dlaczego usunięto moją fotkę - File:Kronika miasta Łodzi - nr 1-2008.JPG. Zdjęcie było zrobione przeze mnie, licencja podwójna GFDL|cc-by-sa-all, fotka była opisana, podałem że ja jestem autorem, więc czemu skasowano? Dzięki. Arewicz (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Kronika miasta Łodzi - nr 4-2008.JPG

Na fotce była okładka czasopisma, podobna do tej, którą wrzucam obok. Dziwne, tym bardziej że resztę zostawiono ... Dodam, że czasopismo jest finansowane przez Urząd Miasta, więc nie jest copyright. Arewicz (talk) 00:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Aha, usunął User:Abigor, niestety zbyt słabo znam angielski, by go zapytać :-( Arewicz (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ulotka wyborcza Gmina Boronów 2006.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ulotka wyborcza Gmina Boronów 2006.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Samulili (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:krzyże

Super! Czy to są wszystkie zdjęcia krzyży przydrożnych z Wikispedycji na Podlasiu? Pozdrawiam serdecznie -- Simpledot (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

O Jak tylko uporam się z koordynatami (których to uzupełnianie chciałabym zakończyć jak najszybciej, a zostało już tylko 313), będę mogła poświęcić więcej czasu i uwagi Podlasiu w kategoriach na Commons (no i na zdjęciach rzecz jasna) :) -- Simpledot (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Elektrownia Rybnik.jpg

Myślałem, że to zdjęcie wrzucił jakiś początkujący communista., a to.... Przykuta. Zdjęcie wygląda na zrobionoe w latach 80/90, a jest napisane, że w 2005. Czy tak jest naprawdę? Zwiadowca ²¹ 19:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Herr Kriss in Fraktal, Mikołów mix.png

Dlugo to trwalo, ale tak jak mowilem - problemy techniczne. Pozwolenie juz jest, a grafiki oznaczone. Herr Kriss (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

some files without a category

Hello Przykuta, some (three) files of you are uncategorized, for instance this one File:Krajowa Wystawa Psów Rasowych Rybnik 2006 publiczność.jpg - can you add categories? Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Capreolus capreolus male p.jpg

Oh Dear!

Hi, do you have non cropped version of this image? As it is not possible to recrop it to square:-(--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Bogdangroth

Powiem Ci, że tego pana chętnie bym widział na wikiekspedycji :) Zwiadowca ²¹ 23:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Tego z tytułu sekcji, nie ze zdjęcia obok. Zwiadowca ²¹ 23:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyrighted by Wikimedia

{{Wikipedia screenshot}} {{CopyrightByWikimedia}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirów Castle.

review

•  Support After reading the scope, this image is the best and most informative. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Mirów Castle - 15.JPG: -1
2. Zamek w Mirowie 12.08.08 p4-k.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Mirów Castle - 15.JPG: Declined.
File:Zamek w Mirowie 12.08.08 p4-k.jpg: Promoted.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

--Myrabella (talk) 01:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

International Photoworkshop

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

wykresy

W czym robisz takie wykresy? Byłbym zainteresowany takim programem. Bubel (talk) 08:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Museums

Hi,

Your project seems interesting and good preparated. I can't travel a lot at this time, but I'll keep an eye on it. I wish you a good luck! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 08:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Mapki

Hej. Dostałam trzy wiadomości o stosowaniu formatu .png w dodawanych mapkach. Mam dokonać konwersji do .png i załadować zaktualizowaną wersję mapki? Bo nie wiem, czego się ode mnie oczekuje, dwie wiadomości nie są po polsku:) Farary (talk) 06:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Strzyzawa 2010 (3).JPG

Dodałem notakę. Lepiej to widać na zdjęciu satelitarnym. Tutaj widzisz znak drogowy na zalanej ulicy, a tutaj i tutaj koniec tej drogi. Pozdrawiam gorąco i słonecznie choć za oknem zimno i mokro :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 45c7445bc42b5ca133156ac403ef2b80

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Re:Filtr polaryzacyjny

Witaj, ja używam raczej aparatu kompaktowego marki Panasonic DMC-FS20 :) Pozdrawiam --FSO talk 19:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Zamiana schematów JPG na PNG

Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Oczywiście, zastosuję się. Pozdrawiam --JarekB (discussion) 15:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Łubno Kościół filialny św. Antoniego Padewskiego 29.12.09 4p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 15:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Witaj, potrzebuję pomocy:) Strzeliłem gafę i stworzyłem pod błędną angielską nazwą całą kategorię i załadowałem kilka plików. Trzeba zmienić w nazwie kategorii cementery na cemetery i analogicznie w błędnych nazwach plików. Ja najprawdopodobniej (słabo znam commons) nie mam możliwości przenoszenia plików. Farary (talk) 16:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Nieaktualne, znalazłem rozwiązanie:) Farary (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Polska niezwykła

Cześć Przykuta! Zapamiętałem Twoje imię w związku z Twoimi zdjęciami Słowacji na Commons, więc wpadło mi w oko również później, kiedy przeglądałem przewodnik pt. "Polska. Przewodnik turystyczny" wyd. Demart z 2009r. Nie wiem czy ta informacja jest dla Ciebie nowa, ale myślę, że może ucieszy Cię, że dwa z Twoich zdjęć zostały wykorzystane w druku (Skansen_w_Nowym_Saczu,_dwor_szlachecki_Rdzawa_-_polichromia_14.08.08_p4.jpg str. 104, Jędrzejów_klasztor_cystersów_organy_12.08.08_p.jpg str. 171). Pozdrawiam, --Pescan (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

identyfikacje

Dopisałem parę uwag do zdjęć roślin wikiekspedycyjnych. Przepraszam, jeśli nie lubisz grzebania na twoich stronach. Panek (talk) 09:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Piotr Szulkin.jpg

Hi- this image really should have evidence of its permission at OTRS. Do you still have the original email correspondence? J Milburn (talk) 11:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikiekspedycja

Odnośnie tej edycji: może zamiast województw napisać po prostu Kaszuby, albo podobnie? Yarl ✉ 14:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Piotr_Szulkin.jpg

File:Piotr_Szulkin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

J Milburn (talk) 22:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Sw. roch

Hello Przykuta. I suppose your photograph File:Sw. roch pow. rzeszowski p.jpg is from Poland but I've never information for that. Could you class it in the good Category:Statues of Saint Roch by country ? Thanks. Père Igor (talk) 15:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Père Igor (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PNBT Nymphaea alba i żaba 03.07.10 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and the froggy gives the image a nice touch. --Quartl 06:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Napowietrzacz w spoczynku 04.07.10 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and usefull. --Nevit 08:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Undeletion request for File:Piotr_Szulkin.jpg

FYI.  Docu  at 14:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Przykuta,

Would you add either "keep deleted" or "please undelete" to the above. In the first case, I would withdraw my nomination?  Docu  at 03:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chociński Młyn budynek 04.07.10 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice house and good image... though sharpness is limit. --Cayambe 14:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nowa Karczma Harbour 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The boats are a bit softish, or is it me? Rama 23:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC) no, it isn't you, but he focussed the wood in foreground which were sharp. I llike the composition, imo good enough to be a QI --Carschten 11:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

About File:2004 Indonesia Tsunami edit.gif

Thanks for the info, and I had change the color of the categories. It's really nice meeting you in Commons. DIAN (talk) 04:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Map_of_poland_without_names.svg

Hi, I can't see any difference between your two derivative works:

• File:Wybory Samorządowe w Polsce 2010 KW gminy mod.png
• File:Wybory Samorządowe w Polsce 2010 KW gminy.png

Also, I think you'll have a better result if you use Inkscape. Regards, Otourly (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

No problems. I wondered to translate your wikinews article in French, but I can't understand polish :S Otourly (talk) 10:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Nice stuffs :) I forwarded the link :) Hum ... well do you have a small translation of your article in English ? Otourly (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

I could, maybe tommorow. Przykuta → [edit] 10:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PNBT zbiornik2 z Nymphaea alba 03.07.10 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bardzo dobrze! --George Chernilevsky 08:28, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gdańsk Dom Pod Murzynkiem 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Dobrze --George Chernilevsky 08:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Odry porosty3 02.07.10 p.jpg

Sprawdziłeś, gdzie prowadzi geokod tego zdjęcia? ;-) pzdr Panek (talk) 11:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaligandaki kagbeni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture is a little bit too soft for my taste but the composition is so great and the lighting so spectacular that I still think it's QI. Great shot. --Murdockcrc 21:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Dziękuję :) --Emesik (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

File:10_lat_ery_Wikipedii.png

File:10_lat_ery_Wikipedii.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

your comment

Hi! Do you meant "edit!" here? I think Google Translate wasn't your friend :) --BáthoryPéter (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Tricky :) In Hungarian we rarely use the "dictionary form", in this case imperative of "szerkesztés" is "szerkessz!". On the picture you can see Grin, the fonder of huwiki just told me, "I signed this page 10 times and this will be the last one, so take out a good picture!" :D – BáthoryPéter (talk) 21:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

I heard about Kpjas's visit, but I wasn't at Budapest to meet with him.. Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki ;) – BáthoryPéter (talk) 10:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Brenna3.jpg

Ponieważ jesteś uploaderem, powiadamiam o brak pozwolenia dla pliku File:Brenna3.jpg, który został opublikowany wcześniej w internecie a co do którego autor wcześniej zastrzegł Fotografia stanowi własność autora. Kopiowanie i rozpowszechnianie fotografii bez jego zgody jest zabronione.. Ponadto autor nie uploadował tego pliku na pl.Wiki. Postępowanie znasz. Wyjaśnione także w opisie pliku. Mejla do autora nie znalazłem. JDavid (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

10M

I've made a start, but I'm not really good at writing in the required tone/style... Hopefully people will fill it in ! :)--Nilfanion (talk) 10:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Its a wiki, you can edit it too of course, I've just put some bare essentials there in the hope others will pad it out. Many of the milestone pics are not very exciting, but that's inevitable I guess.

I'll probably exploit the WMUK release to fill.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'll do some tidyup later today (got other things to do now).--Nilfanion (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Caves

Dzięki, choć ja tylko przekopiowałem sobie link podany przez Aotearoa na stronie dyskusji JDavida z plwiki:) Przy okazji dwie uwagi - w tym spisie, choć b. obszernym, nie ma bynajmniej wszystkich jaskiń, w każdym razie tych pomniejszych (np. przeszukałem bez skutku Jaskinia Ligocka i Jaskinia Chełmska) i w zasadzie póki co jest to chyba propozycja nazewnictwa bo do 30 VI formalnie czekają na uwagi. Czyli na razie nie jest to urzędowy spis. Ale na pewno warto mieć na uwadze, bo wkrótce będzie. Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 14:57, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirów zamek 29.05.2010 p5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żarki kościół św. Stanisława Męczennika 29.05.2010 p9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Carschten 08:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skały Rzędkowickie Turnia Lechwora 29.05.2010 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments some CA and a bit dark, but otherwise very nice --Carschten 08:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirów zamek 29.05.2010 p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit over saturated IMO. --Jebulon 20:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)  Support good to me --Carschten 08:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Mini Jura 2011

Cześć,

faktycznie doskonale wstrzeliliśmy się z pogodą.

Trochę się poszarogęsiłem i powoli wrzucam zdjęcia. Jak coś nie tak to daj znać.

Pozdrowienia,
Kpjas (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cryo protecting gloves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could perhaps be cropped a little bit --Mbdortmund 11:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 50ml Falcon tubes-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments only one is really crisp, but still QI --Mbdortmund 11:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Hello.

I think that the "laboratory pictures" series in QIC is a very good idea, and shows something different (and useful) in this page.

I would like to congratulate you for this.

Maybe could the photographer add some more space around the objects ?

Friendly from Paris --Jebulon (talk) 17:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laboratory heating block Techne-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Precise. --Letartean 17:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portable-gas-burners-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portable propane butane burner-head-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four-channel pipette with tips.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 17:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass 100ml beaker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but good--Jebulon 17:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass graduated cylinder-1000ml.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe crop too tight a bit, but good.--Jebulon 17:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Small cell culture flat flask.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 21:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Votrex-genie-mixer-laboratory-shaker-front-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could be cropped a little bit on top --Mbdortmund 19:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

odp:Thx

You welcome, myślę że to drugie to Portulaca oleracea L. Ale tak na 90% ;-). Potwierdzę u współpracowników. Pozdrawiam Glysiak (talk) 22:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portable Geiger counter Berthold LB122-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simple balance scales-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laboratory peristaltic pump Gilson-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks fine, while minor chromatic aberrations in the bottom can be removed easily (desaturate them).--PereslavlFoto 17:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vacuum 24 manifold for miniprep columns-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Chromatic aberration on the black detail, will support if corrected.--PereslavlFoto 17:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC) Fixed. --King of Hearts 21:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC) Good now. --Avenue 07:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec rzeźba na fontannie 12.06.2010 p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality-- Harrison49 18:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec Populus alba bark2 12.06.2010 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality-- Harrison49 18:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec pinus nigra 12.06.2010 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 13:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec wyścigi chartów 12.06.2010 ch. afgański 2p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot-- Harrison49 18:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec wyścigi chartów 12.06.2010 borzoj p4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot-- Harrison49 18:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parzymiechy łazienki w parku 02.05.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me in spite of the CA on the tree at the right. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świerklaniec biały sznaucer miniatura 12.06.2010 pl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skansen Kolbuszowa chałupa z Budziwoja 03.09.2010 p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 15:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skansen Kolbuszowa chałupa z Żołyni 03.09.2010 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 16:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skansen Kolbuszowa młyn wodny z Żołyni Dolnej 03.09.2010 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI. Please notice there is a Category:Watermills in Poland by voivodeship.--Jebulon 16:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skansen Kolbuszowa chałupa z Markowej 03.09.2010 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice color and framing. --Warfieldian 19:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skansen Kolbuszowa chałupa z Sędziszowa Małopolskiego 03.09.2010 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --H005 20:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolbuszowa Dasychira pudibunda 03.09.10 pl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Pokoju w Jaworze chrzcielnica 21.07.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:56, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

zdjecia zabytki

Zbyt duzo czasu mnie to kosztuje. Ostatecznie skasuję wszystkie moje pliki i bedzie po problemie.--Lowdown (talk) 06:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

• Jest to troche nieprzyjazny zapis zasad konkursu. Lekcewazy on tych ktorzy starali sie i wrzucali zdjecia do projektu WIki Lubi Zabytki WCZESNIEJ. Zatem aby wziac w nim udział mozna skasowac swoje pliki a potem jeszcze raz je opublikować. Zresztą, nie chodzi tu juz o sam konkurs i zachlannosc o nagrody, bo nie zalezy mi na tym. ALe jednak ten regulamin lekceważący uprzednie pliki jest niedorzeczny... Pzdr --Lowdown (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Rozumiem. ALe tak na marginesie. W tabelce realizacji WLZ na wikipedii polskiej widnieje "odfajkowany" wers wojewodztwa podkarpackiego tzn. nalezy domniemywac ze wszystko jest przygotowane i ukonczone, zaś dla przykładu powiat sanocki, dla ktorego wykonywałem zdjecia, jest nieukonczony. Nie zajmuję się akurat edytowaniem tabel ale byc może ktos o tym zapomniał... --Lowdown (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzeum Złota w Złotoryi agat z Nowego Kościoła fragment 21.07.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --null 00:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruszyna kościół św. Macieja Apostoła 27.03.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A description in English should be added. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 09:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Good.--Jebulon 14:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Kościół św. Katarzyny w Dakowach Mokrych .jpg

Nie wiedziałem, że jeszcze potrzebny jest jakiś numer zabytku, nie mam pojecia o co chodzi (słabo znam angielski). Numer rejestracyjny zabytku umieściłem w opisie. Obiekt mieści się w gminie Opalenica, powiat Nowy Tomyśl, województwo Wielkopolskie Pozdrawiam Bialo-zielony (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

konkurs i cała reszta świat

Witam dzięki za informacje pokonkursowe, owszem może trochę przesadziłam z czasem pracy, ale ta uwaga raczej dotyczy całych 2 ostatnich dekad września - bo to moje pierwsze prace dla Wiki i nie bardzo mam doświadczenie w tego typu robocie. Fajny pomysł i spodobała mi się możliwość włączenia się w budowania faktycznie katalogu zabytków. Nawet nie wiem czy prawidłowo wymyśliłam możliwość komunikacji w tej chwili z Tobą, ale moje ryzyko! W odpowiedzi na wiadomość do mnie prościej byłoby mi kliknąć w słówko odpowiedz. A tak to trochę kombinuję, ale mam nadzieję w miarę szybko się dostosować. Owszem mam sporo jeszcze prac, a każde 3-4 godziny zawsze mogą ich ilość zwiększyć o kolejne wiele pozycji. Nie o to chodzi jednak, wolałabym mieć świadomość, że to co robię ma jakiś sens i jest coś więcej niż zwyczajne, niedzielne pstrykania. Cieszę się, że mogłam pomóc. A co to znaczy, że przegoniliśmy Hiszpanów? Mam nadzieję, że nie tylko ich. Ciekawa jestem jak nam poszło. Pozdrawiam serdecznie. Jola

Re: Kategorie

Hej! Dzięki za informację, że można usuwać te ogólne kategorie - to mi mocno ułatwi życie, bo dotąd kombinowałem coś z CatScanem. Myślę, że nazwami zajmiemy się "za drugim przelotem", idąc miejscowość po miejscowości. Na razie postaram się uporządkować ile się da szablony. Jeszcze raz dzięki za podpowiedzi. I małe spostrzeżenie: trochę dyskusyjny jest pomysł, żeby jako ostatni parametr szablonu Zabytek dawać zawsze "gmina XXX", a samo miasto tylko przy miastach na prawach powiatu. Bo np. jest gmina Łowicz i miasto Łowicz, które to miasto jest siedzibą gminy, ale samo do niej nie należy. Takich przypadków jest w Polsce dużo więcej. Powerek38 (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

OTRS

Witam. Kto wstawia numery OTRS do plików? Dostałem te numery mailowo ale widzę, że pliki dalej wiszą jako "OTRS pending". Ja mam wstawić te numery? Glaube (talk) 08:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Zoreczka

Ajajaj. Oczywiście chodziło mi o numer 14. Nazwa tego pliku jakoś wytrąciła mnie z mojej równowagi. Jeśli istnieje techniczna możliwość to proszę o zmianę pliku, bo ten budynek znajduje się przy Rynku 14. Gabriel trzy (talk) 14:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

I jeszcze jedno: Tak, budynek ten znajduje się na rogu Rynku i ul. Opolskiej,a jego nazwa tradycyjna to Dom Szymkowica ;) Gabriel trzy (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolbromek kosciół św. Barbary drzwi 24.07.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfectli sharp at high resolution, but good enough for QI. --Jebulon 15:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Przykuta, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Kłymczak

Witam. Buźkę pana ze środka chciałbym wyciąć do osobnego pliku [1]. Mogę to sam zrobić, niczego nie złamię? I opublikować na takiej samej licencji jak oryginał? Pozdrawiam Glaube (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jugowski potok 28.07.2011 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. --Vassil 22:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznań Collegium Minus 23.09.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 01:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:AGwozdziany Church.jpg

Myślę, że tego może być więcej. Przenosiłem z powiatów. Ale mam nadzieję, że teraz będzie dużo łatwiej je zgrupować i posortować, w poszczególnych diecezjach. Tym bardziej, że linkuję diecezje z Commons do diecezji w plWiki. Liczę na korekty :) Pozdr. --Vladek Komorek (talk) 11:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radków mury obronne 29.07.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No quality problem. --Léna 00:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ścinawka Górna zespół pałacowy 3 29.07.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No quality problem. Léna 00:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC) --Léna 00:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nowa Ruda szyb Lech 29.07.2011 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Léna 00:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Czesław Tuszyński.jpg

Witam, wiesz może jak usunąć swój własny plik? Wrzuciłem go, ponieważ chciałem napisać artykuł na wikipedii o tej osobie i zilustrować go. Napisałem w opisie, że to mój własny plik, ale w sumie znalazłem go na stronie miasta Grodzisk Wlkp i tylko trochę przeedytowałem. Wydawało mi się, że nikt tego nie sprawdzi, ale przecież jest coś takiego jak metadata. Więc może dla świętego spokoju usunąć ten plik z Commons? Pozostałe moje pliki na Commons są ok. Pozdrawiam Bialo-zielony (talk) 11:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Licencja

Witaj. Mogłabyś mi pomóc. Mam mały problem, a mianowicie muszę dodać licencje, do zdjęć, które znalazłem w internecie i nie wiem jak. Czy mogłabyś ich wstawić? Zrobię wszystko co chcesz, tylko mi pomóż, bo inaczej zostaną skasowane. --Jakub96 (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't you like arts except photography?

What exactly does the statement mean? TrebleSeven (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Może się przyda

http://eksploratorzy.com.pl/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=6585&sid=32640c2d5a693759f0c3f5aac1aae866 Mapka z nazwami szybów :) Nemo5576 (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linia kolejowa 141 Ruda Bielszowice 25.06.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice shot. --Ralf Roletschek 12:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julin pałacyk myśliwski 04.09.2010 12p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brzóza Stadnicka spichlerz 04.09.2010 4p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 15:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quito image

Hi Przykuta. Thanks for your help with File:Quito as from panecillo Basilica.jpg. It's indeed better now... and perhaps will reach FP status. --Cayambe (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olsztyn zamek skała wapienna 2010 p-CN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I believe I said I'd promote this one. --Mattbuck 23:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Zakładka promująca Wikipedię-awers.png

Hej,

Poprawiałem opisy i zauważyłem pewną rzecz. Na pewno te napisy to awers, a zdjęcie pająka i główny design to rewers? Pzdr, Herr Kriss (talk) 03:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Góry Wałbrzyskie

Faktycznie, panorama robi wrażenie - 14 Mb to już taka solidna :) Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 15:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Bachórz itd.

Hej. Dzięki za poprawki. Kościół w Bachórzu dużo zyskał, most w Krasicach też wyładniał. Co do cerkwi w Krasicach – nie zauważyłem wyraźnych planek, ale przyciemniałem tam całe niebo i może gdzieś nie domalowałem. ;) Swoją drogą rzeczywiście miałem usyfioną matrycę i jeszcze na dodatek dwa tygodnie przed Wikiekspedycją zarysował mi się paskudnie obiektyw – na szczęście na większości zdjęć udało się to zretuszować (popatrz np. na lewo od figurki na tym zdjęciu albo na schody tu). Zdjęcia obrabiam w lajtrumie, ale mam z tym jeszcze sporo problemów, głównie z poziomami i temperaturą barwową, niemniej każda obrobiona fotka to krok do przodu. ;) Zgodnie z Twoją sugestią zgłoszę jeszcze kilka fotek na QI. -- Pozdrawiam, CLI (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

QI candidates

Please add english description to all your QI candidates. --Iifar (talk) 17:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass capillaries 50ul 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- JDP90 13:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiertarki obrotowo-udarowe, pneumatyczne 14.05.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight CA and small lack of sharpness on the left side but overall QI to me. --Myrabella 20:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tlenowy aparat ucieczkowy Au-2, Faser 14.05.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Złoty Potok brama ul. Parkowa fragment 14.05.2011 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 09:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nowy Sącz - Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Simocephalus.jpg

Mam, ale stack był robiony jeszcze ze zdjęć robionych kompaktem, zaszumienie jest nie do przyjęcia, więcej szczegółów raczej się nie zobaczy. Z czasem kupię jakiś konwerter pod lustro, efekty będą bardziej zadowalające. Dzięki i pozdrawiamKruczy89 (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

QI

Cieszę się, że Ci się podoba :) ale na polskiej wiki nie chyba szans (punkt 5. Użycie: Ilustracja powinna być użyta w jakimś artykule w polskiej Wikipedii). Spróbuję szczęścia na commons. Byłbym wdzięczny za opinię, czy coś z tego Twoim zdaniem by się jeszcze nadawało. Pozdrawiam Kroton (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Dzięki Kroton (talk) 21:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Wystawa fotografii Picture of the Year

Hi Przykuta,

I'm really sorry it's taken so long to get back (I had actually thought I'd already replied to your message!). Anyway yes I'd be more than happy with such an arrangement - in fact now you'll find my images are dual licenced with CC-BY-NC which you may find a more user-friendly licence for your application (a credit to Flagstaffotos/Fir0002 being sufficient).

Thanks for notifying me about it and uploading the photo - gave me a big smile to see it printed and presented so nicely!!

Cheers, --Fir0002 www 14:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Przemyśl

Hej. Zdjęcia w Przemyślu robił Aktron, wszystkie są już załadowane, trzeba je tylko pododawać do projektu WLZ. Zrobię to w wolnej chwili, podobnie jak z resztą miejscowości, które opędziliśmy w trakcie Wikiekspedycji 2011. A tymczasem - pozdrawiam z zaśnieżonego Bryce Canyon. ;) -- CLI (talk) 04:45, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Czersk (powiat mazowiecki), kościół zewnątrz 01.jpg

A ja chyba wiem - ładowałem tę fotkę pomiędzy zdjęciami z Wikiexp 2011 i zapomniałem skasować w Commoniscie kategorii dodawanej do wszystkich plików. Dzięki za info, poprawiłem. ;) -- CLI (talk) 06:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

QI nominations

Hi Przykuta! Thank you for uploading and nominating your fotos on Qi but, can I remind you that " Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon" as you can read here, best regards and ...good luck! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikidata logo proposal

Hey :)

Thank you a lot for your Wikidata logo submissions. We will start the voting next week. Each logo can have a short text next to it on the voting page to explain the idea behind the logo. If you want to have that for your logo please add it to the logo's page and I'll then add it to the voting page.

Good luck! --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siedliska, hlavní silnice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments W porządku. --Sfu 11:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sine Wiry 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 14:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Majdan - station 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niebieszczany - church 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Notable perspective distortion. --Iifar 06:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Pbm 16:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Nice church, I really like the roof --AzaToth 19:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikiexpedice, šestý den-087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a strange spot in the upper right area AzaToth 19:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Fixed. Przykuta 21:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Very nice image, but please make a better (more complete and instructive) description in English and add geocoding too. -- MJJR 21:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pielnia - church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The wires are spoiling nice atmosphere. --Iifar 07:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Version without wires uploaded. --Pbm 15:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Tilted couterclockwise. --Sfu 21:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Fixed. --Pbm 18:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czarna Dolna - cemtery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

kolaże - program

MercYou za pomoc, wypróbuję, a ukłony przekazane, a jakże, panie Prezesie ;)

Sejny

Hej! Oszablonowałem wspomniane przez Ciebie arty o kirkutach. W wolnej chwili coś przy nich podłubię... Mzungu (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Zabytki z Warszawy

Cześć, bardzo Ci dziękuję, właśnie się zastanawiałem, o co qurcze chodzi z tym komunikatem (brak nazwy gminy!). Czy wskażesz mi, jakie numery mam wstawić w przypadku zabytków z innych dzielnic, gdzie to mogę znaleźć? Będę miał jeszcze kilka zdjęć z Woli, Pragi i Mokotowa. Dzięki!--Boston9 (talk) 09:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Bardzo dziękuję, jakby coś - bedę pytał. Pozdrawiam serdecznie! --Boston9 (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Czołem - nieustające dzięki:) Mam jeszcze dwa krótkie pytania: 1. Zauważyłem, że fragment, o którym rozmawiamy, został właśnie usunięty z opisu jednego z moich zdjęć tutaj [2] Czy to oznacza, że jeżeli wpiszę w numer zabytku w samym opisie zdjęcia, nie podaję już tego? Tylko o ile pamiętam, to pole jest wymagane w formularzu Commons. 2. Czy podawać, KIEDY zabytek został wpisany do rejestru? Mam wrażenie, że przynajmniej w Warszawie stosowane były różne formy zapisu, i może wersja z datą byłaby pewniejsza--Boston9 (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Jakie są Twoje doświadczenia z dokładnością danych NID? Mateusz prawidłowo sfotografował budynek przy Grzybowskiej 12 [3], który to adres figuruje w rejestrze zabytków. Jednak jest to gmach Teatru Żydowskiego z lat 60., raczej na pewno nie jest to architektura z poł. XIX wieku. Wydaje mi się, że w rejestrze NID są dwie połączone kamienice pod wspólnym adresem Plac Grzybowski 10, zerknij tutaj [4], [5], zresztą obie są widoczne na innym zdjęciu Mateusza [6]. Może warto zapytać kogoś z NID?--Boston9 (talk) 21:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smialek Castle Party 2012 0 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smialek Castle Party 2012 0 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! V rekonstrukcja Bitwy pod Mławą 1523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smialek Castle Party 2012 0 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, but the right white stripe could be cropped out. The small shadows and left area could also be cropped out--Lmbuga 14:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment done Przykuta 09:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smialek Castle Party 2012 0 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --King of Hearts 03:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! V rekonstrukcja Bitwy pod Mławą 1248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smialek Castle Party 2012 0 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smialek Castle Party 2012 0 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! V rekonstrukcja Bitwy pod Mławą 1326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC) Please add description in English. --Kadellar 17:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! V rekonstrukcja Bitwy pod Mławą 1626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Please add description in English. --Kadellar 17:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Dziękuję

Cześć,

i dziękuję za nominację mojego okbrasku Wilanów,_pinto_de_la_norda_turo_de_la_palaco_5.jpeg. Cieszy mię że cie se podoba.

Wszystkiego najlepsiego, Aisano (cywilne Reinhard)

(po polsku z http://dep.pl)

gminy w WLZ

Witam, Dzięki za informacje o wpisywaniu nazwy gminy w opisie zdjęcia. Od kiedy zajrzałem do działu pytań/odpowiedzi WLZ 2012, staram się podawać też nazwy gmin. Może szkoda, że kreator nie pyta o gminę, wtedy może większa liczba zdjęć byłaby odpowiednio opisana. Staram się też porządkować zdjęcia moje i już istniejące w Commons (kategoryzacja i uzupełnianie tabeli zabytków), choć w tej materii mam jeszcze mało doświadczenia. A przy okazji pytanie, czy szablon "zabytek" w opisie zdjęcia "przeszkadza", gdy jest zdublowany w kategorii? Usuwanie ręcznie szablonu z kilkuset wgranych zdjęć jest dość kłopotliwe. Pozdrawiam, BaZie (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: gminy

Dziękuję za rady. W najbliższym czasie (gdy pogoda się nie zmieni i nie będzie szans na wyruszenie w Białystok - bo coś jest zaniedbany, a tymczasem ja się ciągam po wioskach ;) Ostatni tydzień ma byc słoneczny więc może być gorąco ;) ), postaram się zrobić porządek z gminami w moich plikach. Nexusdx (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: e-mail

Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi na brak e-maila :-) Już uzupełniłem, jednakowoż widząc konkurencję, nie spodziewam się, aby jury miało konieczność kontaktu ze mną ;-) Andrzej Otrębski (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosciol w Tropiu ffolas 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A part of the grass could be cropped, but QI for me. --JLPC 18:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wrocław Plac Uniwersytecki 7 sm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieszawa muzeum Noakowskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirsk Betleja2 sm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO QI, but you should remove the CA on the top --DKrieger 16:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Aktywny e-mail

Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Swoją drogą czy jeśli chcę, aby moje zdjęcie było brane pod uwagę w kategorii "Najlepsze zdjęcie", to muszę je oddzielnie gdzieś zgłaszać, czy po prostu jurorzy przejrzą wszystkie nadesłane w ramach konkursu prace? Pozdrawiam, Krysiul (talk) 10:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Ponownie dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi i informacje. Wiem o przepaleniach, staram się ich unikać i w miarę, jak robię coraz więcej zdjęć, myślę, że jest coraz lepiej - czasem to nie tylko kwestia oświetlenia, ale też samego aparatu i dość czułej matrycy, ale i jego coraz lepiej wyczuwam. Pozdrawiam, Krysiul (talk) 22:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Czytałem już wcześniej książkę spod linka. Właśnie to mam na myśli, mówiąc, o czułej matrycy: czasem nawet mając słońce za plecami, przy niezbyt ostrym słońcu zdarza się, że mam przepalenia np. na chmurach albo jasnych elewacjach budynków. Skracanie czasu naświetlania albo manipulowanie przysłoną czasem pomaga, a czasem zdjęcie wychodzi zbyt ciemne, jak uda "wygasić" się przepalenia. No ale nie ma co gderać, trzeba sobie jakoś radzić :) Pozdrawiam, Krysiul (talk) 00:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew wraz z dzwonnicą.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Przedłużenie ładowania zdjęć

Cześć. Czy istnieje możliwość, żebyście przedłużyli okres, kiedy można ładować zdjęcia a ramach Wiki Lubi Zabytki do 6. rano? Mam jeszcze mnóstwo zdjęć do obrobienia i załadowania, nie chciałbym robić tego byle jak i na szybko, a do północy na pewno się nie wyrobię. Myślę, że więcej osób może mieć podobny problem i na pewno pomoże to jakości zdjęć ładowanych w ostatnich godzinach konkursu, a o północy od razu raczej nie zaczniecie wyłaniać zwycięzców ;) Pozdrawiam, Krysiul (talk) 16:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Nie bawiłem się Vicuną i nie chciałbym obecnie tracić czasu na zapoznawanie się z nią. Ładuję standardowym kreatorem, korzystając z wykazu zabytków na wiki. Krysiul (talk) 17:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

A guide to Polish copyright

Following some recent discussions, I have attempted to compile a guide to Polish copyright. It's available at User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright. I'd like to invite you to comment on it, and of course you are more then welcome to improve it. I am contacting you and several other commons editors who I know work with Polish Copyrights, as I am not aware of any centralized noticeboard to reach them, feel free to pass this message to such a place if it exists, and to whoever else you think could be interested in such a topic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Przykuta, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Mużakowski Rhododendron catawbiense 22.05.2012 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtica dioica pokrój2 23.06.2012 p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)