User talk:Pruneau/Archive 2

Ezra Taft Benson

The croped image you posted as File:Ezra Taft Benson.jpg does not depict w:Ezra Taft Benson; it instead shows de:Theodor Sonnemann, a German official. If you look at the uncropped photo you can see part of Benson's face (wearing horn-rim glasses) to the right of the right most photographer, behind the man in the forfront/far right location in the photo. Please correct this mistake in the file name. -- 208.81.184.4 23:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've uploaded a correctly named version, tagged the other one for speedy deletion, and taken it out of the Wikipedia article where it was displayed. Cheers, Pruneau^talk 10:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks ..

...for the RFB support. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Photographs of identifiable people again

I have made some changes to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people/Proposal in response to a variety of helpful suggestions that users have made on the talk page. You have already commented there; could I ask you to have a look again, and to consider whether you would like to express an opinion in the Poll towards the bottom of the page? Many thanks. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Cartes

Pour tes cartes, le nid des cartographes c'est là : fr:WP:AG/C. L'atelier posède aussi une page de discussion, et une FAQ SVG très complète. Yug (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Monitoring POTY

Sorry to be late on this - I have an essay coming up due for University. Pretty much just monitoring pages. Don't worry too much about the 200 edits - they don't necessarily have to be on commons, so it's probably easier just to ignore that for now and deal with it at the end. Make sure the numbered lists are maintained, and that any oppose votes and nasty comments are removed (this is not the place to rehash its FPC candidacy). And, of course, if you notice any signs of fraud, then let me know.

How many galleries would you be up to monitoring? A once-per-day-or-so check of them is more than ampleAdam Cuerden (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Image de l'année 2008

Bonjour, et merci pour votre intérêt pour le concours de l'image de l'année 2008 ! Peuvent voter à ce concours tous les Wikimédiens inscrits avant le 1er janvier 2009 et possédant plus de 200 contributions. Autant que je puisse voir, ce n'est pas votre cas, mais je me demande si vous ne seriez pas inscrit sur la Wikipédia francophone sous un autre nom. Si c'est le cas, la façon la plus simple de s'assurer que vos votes seront comptés est d'unifier vos comptes. Amicalement, Pruneau^talk 14:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

OUI oui, j'ai plus de 200 contributions sur wikipédia.fr avec comme login Tpa2067 ! et je vois comme toi que wikipedia.fr n'apparaît pas sur mon SUL alors j'ai cliqué sur unifier vos comptes et là sur Special:MergeAccount. ça me dit :

You can now log in to any wiki site of the Wikimedia Foundation without creating a new account.

   Read more about unified login... 

The account named "Tpa2067" on each of the following sites have been automatically attached to the unified account:

   * commons.wikimedia.org
   * de.wikipedia.org
   * en.wikipedia.org
   * en.wikibooks.org
   * en.wikinews.org
   * en.wikiquote.org
   * en.wikisource.org
   * en.wiktionary.org
   * fr.wikipedia.org
   * fr.wikibooks.org
   * fr.wikisource.org
   * fr.wiktionary.org
   * www.mediawiki.org
   * meta.wikimedia.org
   * ru.wikipedia.org
   * species.wikimedia.org

donc je ne comprends pas pourquoi fr.wikipedia.org n'apparaît pas sur mon SUL??!!

ton aide est la bienvenue!!--Tpa2067 (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

POTY eligibilty

Thanks! That makes it a lot better than having constantly copy and paste. One thing though, I would recommend changing the tool to check to this one. I have found that the one from pathoschild can easily miss certain wikis. Pbroks13 (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

Thanks for the help.Yousaf465 (talk)

--Tpa2067 (talk) 16:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)== Vote pour l'image 2008 ==

Bonjour, Te souviens-tu, on avait déjà été en contact là tout est arrangé depuis !

je t'écris suite à une conversation au bistro. Je viens te proposer mon aide pour le dépouillement des votes du premier tour de l'élection de l'image de l'année 2008. J'ai compris que la procédure est très lourde mais si je peux faire quelques images pour accélérer la venue des résultats, je le ferai conscienceusement. Qu'en penses-tu? --Tpa2067 (talk) 04:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour, et merci pour ton offre d'aide ! En fait, je crois que tous les votes ont maintenant été vérifiés (essentiellement par Miya), donc le deuxième tour devrait commencer très bientôt. Amicalement, Pruneau^talk 15:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay! Super!! Si vous avez besoin d'un coup de main pour le dépouillement du deuxième tour, je reste à la disposition de l'équipe.--Tpa2067 (talk) 16:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

template:iw => ce n'est pas un code de langue ?

Salut, j'ai vu que tu venais de créer ce modèle ; n'y a't-il pas un risque qu'il entre en conflit avec un éventuel/futur code de langue 'iw'?
Bien cordialement,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 17:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Mix up

I just wanted to give you a heads up that you mixed up Radmanovic and Silajdzic [1], you should delete the images and re upload them. PRODUCER (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for warning me, and for reuploading the correct images! And sorry about the mix-up. Pruneau^talk 07:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

MEDEF

Hi Pruneau, thats a GREAT resource, thank you for doing some transferes. How do you make the identification? I already saw some of this pictures while searching flickr, but i was unable to identificate the persons, i also did not find any participants list on the web. Very good work. After noticing your good work I yesterday found a new one: http://www.flickr.com/photos/35952250@N02/. Of course we dont need any more photos of Joe Biden, but there are some interesting lesser known politicians not covered by other image resources yet. --Martin H. (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Of course acces to the french language helps you here, i was unable to find the participants list. I will go thrugh the PN stream the next time, but like I said: I think a group photo of politicians is interesting, but a bad portrait like http://www.flickr.com/photos/35952250@N02/3391135704/ is not interesting, we have many more images of this person. I will transfer the intersting and try my best to crop persons from group images we dont have a good portrait yet. Keep on the good work :) --Martin H. (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Rubén Lobato.jpg

Bonjour. Il y a un problème avec la photo File:Rubén Lobato.jpg : il ne s'agit pas de Ruben Lobato mais de David Millar. Je ne sais pas comment il est possible de renommer une photo, je vous laisse y procéder. Cordialement. Vlaam (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Merci de me l'avoir signalé. Je m'étais fié à la description sur la page Flickr, mais je vois en effet que Lobato était le numéro 145 et non 146. J'ai simplement listé le fichier à la suppression immédiate, comme File:Millar Champs Elysees - Tour 2006.jpg existe déjà. Pruneau^talk 13:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

IRENA Signatories

Dear Pruneau, could you please update the world map showing the signatory states of IRENA. On Thursday 16 April 2009 the Republic of Guinea signed the Statute. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.198.13.122 (talk) 12:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done Thank you for letting me know they signed the statute! Pruneau^talk 17:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Please ,could you update the map again  ? 22 more states signed on 29 june . this link can help you: http://www.irena.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=93. thanks in andvance ,217.202.87.6 20:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Shirley Bassey wax sculpture.jpg

I added the file to a mass deletion request on wax figures. Regards, --Martin H. (talk) 19:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll check whether I missed any others. Pruneau^talk 19:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

I don`t no speak to english. I`m in the school. Olga007 (talk) 09:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

It looks like User:Masur speaks your language; I'm sure they'll be able to assist you. Pruneau^talk

Appel à des compétences

Bonjour, j'en appelle à toi pour deux points:

• peux tu m'expliquer pourquoi l'image Une_noce_chez_le_photographe.jpg a été supprimée et pourquoi pas File:Dagnan-Bouveret Marguerite au Sabbat.jpg ?
• lors de mes premières contributions, alors novice (je le suis encore), j'ai fait apparaitre mon nom comme auteur de certaines photos au lieu de préciser tout simplement personnel (cf la case commentaire de l'historique fichier du File:Certosa di ferrara.jpg et d'autres). Qui peut intervenir sur la page pour faire disparaitre mon nom ( ce qui m'embête c'est que plus j'en parle et moins l'anonymat est préservé). Par avance merci [[::fr::Utilisateur:Pramzan|Pramzan]] 28 mai 2009

Bonjour, N'étant pas administrateur, je ne peux pas voir les fichiers supprimés. Le mieux que je puisse faire, c'est jouer aux devinettes : est-ce que par hasard File:Une_noce_chez_le_photographe.jpg était la même chose que File:Dagnan Bouveret Une Noce chez le photographe.jpg? Si c'est bien ça, ce serait un motif de suppression. D'un autre côté, ce n'est pas ce qui est indiqué dans les logs. Le problème est peut-être plutôt que tu avais indiqué qu'il s'agissait d'un travail personnel, alors qu'il s'agit en fait d'une oeuvre du domaine public (puisque l'auteur est mort il y a plus de 70 ans). Si tu ajoutes d'autres vieilles peintures sur Commons, le mieux est d'utiliser les mêmes modèles que sur File:Dagnan-Bouveret Marguerite au Sabbat.jpg (à savoir {{PD-art|PD-old-70}}. Si tu veux plus de détails sur la suppression de cette image, le mieux est de demander à l'administrateur qui l'a supprimée, User:Kameraad Pjotr (il parle un peu français).

Concernant la suppression de ton nom, il suffit de demander à un administrateur. Ils sont classés par langue sur la page Commons:List of administrators by language. Si tu veux éviter d'en parler en public, tu peux utiliser la fonction "Lui envoyer un courriel" dans la colonne de gauche. Amicalement, Pruneau^talk 09:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Ping

You've got some e-mail in your inbox. — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 15:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: PD-1923 in Chinese

Good catch! I have corrected it. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 02:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Administrator

---

Offert au nouvel administrateur par ses confrères…

Félicitations Pruneau ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Good luck Pruneau, and congratulations. — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 14:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Pruneau, and welcome to our team. Please pardon me that I missed your candidacy — unfortunately I had barely time for Commons in the recent weeks. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 17:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Carte France circonscription

Bonjour Pruneau, est-ce que tu aurais ta version de travail de Circonscriptions françaises européennes 2004.svg pour actualiser le nombre de députés européens par circonscription. Sur celle disponible, les calques ont été fusionnés, et cela représente pas mal de boulot d'en refaire une autre. Merci, cordialement --Lautre02 (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour, j'ai travaillé à partir de File:Carte vierge départements français avec DOM.svg. Je ne vois pas vraiment en quoi la fusion des calques pose problème : les nombres de députés sont facilement actualisables, soit avec InkScape, soit en éditant le code source directement. Pourrais-tu me dire ce que tu cherches à faire comme carte ? Toutes les cartes auxquelles je pense peuvent se faire en quelques minutes à partir de celle-ci. S'il s'agit simplement d'actualiser le nombre de députés, il y a déjà File:Circonscriptions françaises européennes 2009.svg. Cordialement, Pruneau^talk 07:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Merci pour ta réponse. Je débute un peu en ce qui concerne les illustrations sur Wikipedia, donc j'ai ouvert le fichier avec Illustrator et donc je n'avais qu'une image fusionnée, donc sans possibilité d'actualiser, à moins de recouvrir et réécrire par dessus les chiffres, méthode plutôt artisanale. Je vais me pencher sur InkScape et sur l'édition du code source. C'est en expérimentant qu'on progresse, n'est-il pas ? Cdlt,--Lautre02 (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

bosnia map

You said this, in regards to that fraudulent bosnia map... quoteKeep (for now). This is used in many projects. If there is consensus on the Wikipedias to use another map, then they should and can go ahead and use another map, but they haven't so far. It isn't up to Commons to impose such editorial choices on the Wikipedias.quote What difference does it make if it is used in many projects if it is a clearly wrong map? The person who made these maps does not want to cooperate with new ones which exist. There has been a big discussion, the author has agreed that the map is wrong, and now is not moving forward in anything to agree with the new maps that I have presented to him. (LAz17 (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC))

Hi. I'm afraid I don't really understand your argument: if everyone agrees this map is wrong, why is it still used in so many places? Couldn't you have this discussion on Wikipedia, and reach consensus to use another map there? As I said, from Commons' point of view, it looks that the Wikipedia need this file (despite the mistakes you say it has), so why would we delete it? Pruneau^talk 07:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The map is there because of what happened on the english wikipedia. The Croats used these maps to replace other maps. I have, and many others too, have indicated that their maps are fraudulent, yet they continued to keep them. I have started to delete their maps, one step at a time. The author of these maps held one last stand, and boy did it last a while. But, we came to the concensus that the map that I provided for 1991 is CORRECT. You can see that here, at the bottom, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rjecina/Bosnian_census . As for why are they on so many wikipedias - one simple reason... someone who speaks another language thought that this map looks good and decided to put it up on the project of their language. There is nothing unusual here. Simply, the person had little knowledge on the ethnic map of the region, and tried to expand the page in the other language. TO be honest, the map itself does not look too bad, and people can easily be fooled by it. This is why it is very useful to read the renowned "Mark Monmonier"s book "how to lie with maps". We see this going on here. (LAz17 (talk) 14:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)).

Where does it indicate on which wikiprojects this map is? Are admins only allowed to see that? (LAz17 (talk) 14:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)).

To find out where an image is used, use the "check usage" tab at the top of any image page, next to the "watch" tab. Any user can see that.

I can't understand the discussion you've linked to, since half of it is in Croatian. Anyhow, the point remains: this is an editorial issue, which should be dealt with first and foremost by the Wikipedias. I would suggest that you notify the various Wikipedias about the issues you say this image has, so that they can take the actions they deem necessary. Pruneau^talk 15:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richard Schiff.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Acceptable scope, image matches the scope. Yann (talk) 10:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Meets all of the criteria for a Valued Image.--Captain-tucker (talk) 12:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 17:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Kingdom of Humanity.svg

Could you explain to me why the image was restored? I'm a little mystified. J Milburn (talk) 20:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Do you feel my original tagging with {{Npd}} was incorrect? Should I have nominated there from the beginning? J Milburn (talk) 21:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

If someone edit wars to remove a legitimate speedy deletion/quasi-speedy deletion notice, the image should instead be sent to a deletion discussion? As I said before, AnonMoos failed to provide any evidence during our discussions while he repeatedly removed the tag (which was reinstated by myself and others) and so I'm somewhat sceptical that he will provide any if it is sent to a deletion discussion. I concede that a discussion will certainly resolve the issue, but I'm not really seeing it as the best possible solution... J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Knochenhand.jpg

You deleted the file knochenhand.jpg. I at first uploaded the wrong version, this one had been deleted. Than I uploaded the right version (lower resolution), and the permission of the author has being sent to permissions.wikipedi.org. I have the copy of the permission mail. What's wrong. ? --Marinelli (talk) 10:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I saw you deleted all the files relating to Gerhard Gepp. There are Fussball_und_Freud.jpg, Saurier.jpg, Fenster_jpg and Fernseher_jpg.

I wanted only the high resolution deleted, and the low resolution uploaded is okay. this is a mistake. Could you please undo the deletion of Aug. 21? Thank you. --Marinelli (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that; I thought you wanted to upload even lower resolution files. I have restored the following: File:Knochenhand.jpg, File:Fussball_und_Freud.jpg, File:Saurier.jpg, File:Fenster.jpg and File:Endspiel.jpg. I couldn't find looking like Fernseher_jpg. Since you have forwarded permission to OTRS, could you add {{OTRS pending}} to the description pages? Again, sorry about the mistake. Pruneau^talk 11:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know how to handle OTRS, because I have not yet recieved the ticket - number. --Marinelli (talk) 11:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicolas Sarkozy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Crop is not ideal, but I couldn't find a better image of him on Commons. -- H005 (talk) 23:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carol W. Greider.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Also used on the official Nobel foundation announcement: [2] Pruneau^talk 2009-10-06 08:18 (UTC)
•  Request I am ready to support but I have just a tiny remark: the geolocalised data point to an outside place (the street along the university in ACME mapper satellite view). Might this be amended?--Myrabella (talk) 11:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
  •  Done Pruneau^talk 12:32, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for these addenda. OK to me, all criteria met. Note: in :en:wikipedia, the article on telomerase dates the discovery of this enzyme to 1985. (1984 in the image description and in en:Carol W. Greider) --Myrabella (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elizabeth Blackburn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Also used on the official Nobel foundation announcement: [3] Pruneau^talk 2009-10-06 08:21 (UTC)
•  RequestTwo tiny remarks: 1/The description might mention Carol Greider (as the nominated image about Carol Greider mentions Elizabeth Blackburn in the co-discovery of telomerase); 2/the geolocalised data point to an outside place (the street along the university in ACME mapper satellite view). Might these two points be amended? --Myrabella (talk) 12:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
  •  Done I also added a mention of Jack Szostak, the 3rd co-winner of the Nobel Prize. I've changed the location very slightly so that it's clearly inside the University buildings. Pruneau^talk 12:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for these addenda. OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 15:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your work on my two pictures. Its quite funny: I've taken them whith a cheap digital camera, and I remember that I've been a bit jealous of a professional photographer who used a SLR-zoom lens of a stovepipe-like size I had never seen before. One of his photos was now printed in one of our national newspapers, but it had no better quality than my Blackburn-photo. --Gerbil (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image File:Château de Bonrepos.jpg

I was beginning an article for the English WikiPedia on the Chateau de Bonrepos, home of Pierre-Paul Riquet, the designer of the Canal du Midi. Do you know if your picture is of his home? I note that the lat/lon you provided for the photo is markedly different then the one provided on Bonrepos-Riquet. GloverEpp (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'm afraid I don't know anything about this castle: all I did was transfer the file from Flickr. The details of the photographer are given on the file description page, so you could ask him about it. The location give on the file page were also copied from the Flickr page. Best, Pruneau^talk 19:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Permission Requests

In the Village pump, you expressed interest in a permission requests coordination project. WikiProject Permission requests is now up and running, and would welcome your help in the team! -- JovanCormac 09:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I added myself to the list of members. I can only be semi-active right now, but it should be better quite soon. Pruneau^talk 19:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Deletion policy

Hello Pruneau, I have just added a comment to your discussion for speedy deletions for "out-of-scope-files". Is there a consensus that is reached? Perhaps we have to wait for two weeks. - You will know how to proceed further. Perhaps people who are not familiar with the thousands of old uncategorized files don't see the necessity for a change. Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 08:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello Cholo, I don't think consensus has been reached yet, but I certainly hope some solution comes out of the discussion (speedy deletion or something else): the current policy is not tenable in my opinion. Pruneau^talk 11:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Koffi_Olomidé.jpg

File:Koffi_Olomidé.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

–Tryphon^☂ 10:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)