User talk:TheTokl

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, TheTokl!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

BAWS photos?

[edit]

Hi, it was great to meet you at the Bay Area WikiSalon in August. Did you get any good photos? I'd love to see them if so! -Pete F (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pete F! I´m still on vacation until Sept 25 - I´m sorry that I´m not able to upload the photos before that date. --TheTokl (talk) 18:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem of course -- enjoy your trip! -Pete F (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urheber

[edit]

Hi! Ich hab gesehen, dass du in Dateibeschreibungsseiten den Parameter „Urheber“ nicht ausgefüllt hast – das wird bei Verwendung des Media Viewers etwas problematisch, da dieser (mobil) nur Lizenz und Urheber anzeigt! Könntest du die Angabe ins vorgesehene Feld verschieben? Wäre wohl besser. Grüße XanonymusX (talk) 08:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funktioniert mit dem Commonist leider nicht - und ich werde sicher nicht bei 1000 Fotos diese Zeile manuell einfügen. Aber danke für den Hinweis. --TheTokl (talk) 08:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gibt´s da vl einen Bot dafür XanonymusX? --TheTokl (talk) 09:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, müsste es wohl, war ja einer der Hauptkritikpunkte am Media Viewer … Ich frag mal einen Admin! Commonist kenne ich nur vom Hörensagen, ich verwende den klassischen Hochladedialog. XanonymusX (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, wir arbeiten dran! Interessant: Die Zeile fehlt nicht, sondern wird bloß nicht angezeigt, da bei deinem Benutzernamen das de vorne nicht durch einen : deaktiviert wurde; dafür verlinken die betroffenen Fotos bei den Interwikis alle auf deine de.wiki-Benutzerseite! Eine Ahnung, um wie viele Dateien es geht (vermutlich alle, nach meinen Stichproben)? Mein Adminkollege sucht eine Möglichkeit, das per Commons:Batch editing zu korrigieren, also kein Drama; wahrscheinlich musst du nur künftig die Eingabe beim Commonist ändern. Grüße--XanonymusX (talk) 09:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Hilfe, XanonymusX! Ja, da es so viele Fotos sind (USA-Reise mit WMAT-Equipment), nutze ich den Uploader - geht schneller. Ja, es sind alle bis auf die ersten paar - da verwendete ich noch den Vicuna-Uploader, der aber meine Koordinaten nicht einsetzt . Du findest sie am besten unter der - daher könnte ein Bot auch alle Fotos bearbeiten, die diese Kategorie haben, oder nicht? Bzw. müsste man halt die Bilder in der Kategorie des jeweiligen Tages ändern. Sind ja nur die betreffenden Bilder unter der Kat... Ja, das Problem ist, dass das mit dem Commonist nicht funktioniert... bzw. ich weiß nicht wie... Danke nochmal! Gratulation zur 1.000.!--TheTokl (talk) 13:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ich kümmere mich jetzt mal drum, falls was schiefgeht, war ich aber nicht schuld --XanonymusX (talk) 20:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Das Tool ist klasse! Mit File:Hill of Twin Peaks (TK1).JPG hab ich jetzt auch noch meine 1.000. Commons-Bearbeitung gemacht.--XanonymusX (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@XanonymusX: Super, danke! Kannst du mir verraten, wie das Tool heißt? Es kommen ja noch einige hundert Fotos . --TheTokl (talk) 06:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Aber es muss doch möglich sein, im Commonist den Fehler schon zu korrigieren, bevor du hochlädst – einfach bei author den fehlenden Doppelpunkt in der Eingabe ergänzen! Ansonsten findest du das Tool in den jeweiligen Editkommentaren verlinkt! ;) --XanonymusX (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, XanonymusX - hab´s jetzt entdeckt - sollte ab jetzt funktionieren. Danke für die Hilfe und das Ausbessern! --TheTokl (talk) 13:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Na fein! Gruß nach Innsbruck! --XanonymusX (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shipwreck at Point Reyes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 05:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse (TK1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I don't mind that there's a lot of ocean, since it adds to the background. --Peulle 17:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:WikiAlpenforum in Bern 2018 by TheTokl 18.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WikiAlpenforum in Bern 2018 by TheTokl 18.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Screenshot vom Digital-Stammtisch Innsbruck 2-4-2020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:SS
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Magnesitbergbau in Tux um 1950.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Magnesitbergbau in Tux um 1950.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 06:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

[edit]

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Anna Strigl. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 20:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]