User talk:Paasikivi/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:Adolf Erik Nordenskiöldin muistomerkki 008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hei,

Olet merkinnyt kuvalle File:Wihurintalotalvella 3102.jpg päiväykseksi 1.1.1980 ja kuvatekstiksi myös. Vuonna 1980 kuitenkaan tuskin oli Canon Powershot A720 digikameroita; näyttää pikemminkin siltä että kameran päiväystä ei ole asetettu. Jos olet itse ottanut kuvan muistanet varmaan edes vuoden tai näet sen ehkä tiedoston päiväyksestä? MKFI (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Päivytyksen oli mennyt pieleen huomasin sen heti mutta en osaa muuttaa sitä. Päivämäärä pitäisii olla 2008.--Paasikivi (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Aurinkokello(3)einoruutsalodidrichsenintaidemuseo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Crescendopatsas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:SibeliusMonumenthelsinki2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Sibeliuksenpääsibeliuspuistossa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Patsaiden kuvat

Hei,

Suomen tekijänoikeuslain mukaan patsaiden sekä niiden kuvien tekijänoikeudet säilyvät taiteilijalla tai tämän perillisillä 70 vuotta taiteilijan kuoleman jälkeen. Vaikka patsas olisi ollut vuosikymmeniä julkisella paikalla ei siitä silti saa julkaista kuvia ilman lupaa. Eli kaikki vuoden 1942 jälkeen kuolleiden taiteilijoiden patsaat ovat yhä tekijänoikeuden suojaamia. Joissakin muissa maissa on väljemmät säännöt, esimerkiksi Ruotsissa tai Saksassa olevia suomalaistenkin taiteilijoiden patsaiden kuvia saa julkaista. Katso Commons:Freedom of panorama tarkemmista säännöistä. MKFI (talk) 09:17, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Olen nyt tietoinen asiasta. Entä seuraavat patsaat joita olen lisännyt ovatko ne tekijänoikeuden alaisia: Lyhdynkantajatpatsas (Emil Wikström kuoli 1942), Pekka-koira Emil Cedercreutz (kuoli 1949), Henrik Borgströmin rintakuva (Walter Runeberg kuoli 1920). Rakennukset eivät ole kaiketi tekijänoikeus suojan alaisia. Esim Marmoripalatsi tai Berlaymont (Euroopan komission päämaja). --Paasikivi (talk) 09:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Patsaiden tekijänoikeudet (ja tekijänoikeudet yleensäkin) ovat sellainen tapaus mihin helposti kompastuu. Lyhdynkantajat sekä Henrik Borgströmin rintakuva ovat vapaasti kuvattavissa, mutta Pekka-koira ei vielä. Rakennukset ovat suomessa vapaata riistaa, mutta eivät välttämättä muualla esim. Ranskassa rakennuksetkin voivat olla (mutta eivät aina ole) tekijänoikeuden suojaamia. MKFI (talk) 09:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Siirsin seuraavat kuvat suomenkieliseen wikipediaan käytettäväksi sitaattioikeuden kautta. Sitaattioikeus toimii siten, että aiheista joista ei ole mahdollista saada muuten vapaata kuvaa voi käyttää paikallisesti talletettua sitaattikuvaa kuvan aihetta käsittelevässä artikkelissa. Tässä mielessä kuvien käyttö luetteloissa menee aika lailla rajoilla, mutta ajattelin kirjoittaa noista myös lyhyet artikkelit niin kuvien käyttö niissä on ihan ok.
Tuo kuva Sibeliuksen päästä oli muuten oikein hieno. Varmistaisin muuten vielä, että olet kuvien ottaja? Tämä sitä varten, että osaan vastata, että noiden kuvien tiedot ovat sen puolesta oikein jos joku asiaa minulta joskus tulevaisuudessa kysyy. --Zache (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Sibeliuksen lärvi ja kaikki kuvat ovat minun Käyttäjä:Paasikiven ottamia. --Paasikivi (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Sibeliusmonumentti2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Luokittelu

Ja olisin kovin kiitollinen jos luokittelisit tallettamasi kuvat itse. Esimerkiksi Category:Helsinki tai Category:Buildings in Helsinki alta löytyy sopivia luokkia. MKFI (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Crescendo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:CrescendoDidrichsenintaidemuseo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Pekkakoirahelsinginkaivopuistokalliolinnantie.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Pekkakoirahelsinginkaivopuistokalliolinnantie4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Urhokekkonenmuistomerkki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Larinpaarske.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi! We from the Luxembourg wiki wondered whether you might still remember where exactly you took the abovementioned photo?
Hei! Meillä päässä Luxemburgin wiki kysyä, jos Muistatko vielä, jos olet tehnyt kuvasta (katu tai aluetta jne.)?
--Otets (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

This photo is taken from Luxembourg city in open air from a street. --Paasikivi (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. One of us seems in the meanwhile have found out the exact place and updated the photo description at Commons. If you want, you can confirm that update. --Otets (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Deleted files

Hello Paasikivi! Here's a list of the files you wanted deleted:

Let me know if you need anything else. Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

I have puted the speedy delete tag on some photos taken by Me. So could you delete them for me. Thanks for deleting the other pohotos. --Paasikivi (talk) 09:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Berlaymont buildingbryssels2010frontside.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Project scope

Hi Paasikivi, please respect that Commons has a project scope and that contributed images must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. For this reason please give useful categories and useful descriptions to your images. So that every other user can find your images through their categories and can understand what you want to teach with the images through their descriptions. To meet the project scope please keep everything as educational as possible. Keep in mind that most people in the world do not know what is visible in your images and therefore urgently require understandable descriptions and categories made by you!

  • Categorizing everything Nature of Mallorca doesn't make any sense. Do you really don't know the municipality in which you took the images or did you overlook the subcategories of Category:Nature of Mallorca by municipality?
  • Do you really think that this tree is an orange as you categorized? Actually it's neither an orange nor an orange tree!
  • etc (many more nonsense).

-- Ies (talk) 17:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Jarekt (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:Agramahal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 06:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

File:EuropeanParliamentFrenchPostStamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

This edit is not the way to do this; you did not even give a reason as is necessary. Just make any comments you want on the deletion nomination page linked at the top of the image page and above. Ww2censor (talk) 13:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Irish Currency uploaded by Paasikivi

Irish Currency uploaded by Paasikivi has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently uploading media that is in violation of Commons' licensing policy, despite our warnings not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See block log.
(toolbox: contributionspage moves)

Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  suomi  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی 

De728631 (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I think there is some misunderstanding here. I will stop loading photos here which are against the copyright violations if that is so. So if you can lift my block I will give an word as user that I will stop copyright violations . I will only download photos which are taken by my with my camera.All the photos which are against copy right can be deleted. I will only download photos taken by my camera if the ban will be lifted in the future. I would like to continue downloading photos to Commons which I have done already from 2013.I am ready to settle to an one month ban if the lifelong ban will be lifted.I didn't get actually any copy right warnings from the User:De728631 to my User Talk page about those photos which have copyright problems. So I think that this lifelong ban is not an fair ban. Because there was no any warnings about the issue before the banning was put on my account.I would like to continue in Commons and I will expect longer ban for solution to lifelong banning. I regret and apologize about my actions about the copy right issue which happened today January 9 2016. Your sincerity --Paasikivi (talk) 14:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "This user has really uploaded a lot of copyright violations, but he has done also useful job. The user was never blocked before. I think, that indefinite block was not a proper decision. I agree with Paasikivi, that 1 month block is better. So I reduce block into 1 month and I hope, that Paasikivi does not upload more copyright violations. Next block will be longer, maybe even indefinite. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)"
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Given Paasikivi's long history of copyright infringements I got the impression that he should already have known what to upload and what not when he created File:Ian Smith Rhodesia.jpg, File:Alexei Kosygin1966.jpg and others on 9 January which is why I chose an indefinite block. I agree though that a blocking period of 1 month is more appropriate. De728631 (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I am not against if my photos are deleted for copyright issue. Some of the photos like currency pictures are foreign currency which country's copyright is not always clear. I am not copyright expert like most of the Commons users are. I can except an deal that if any users inform in my talk page if the photos has problem before it is totally deleted or I have been totally banned in Commons. Lifelong ban is not an answer. Not in any Wiki projects in an user who has been an long time in Commons. Vandalizing is different issue totally. Every body makes mistakes. I am not against if my currency or postal stamp photos are deleted because of copyright issues. But Lifelong ban is different than issues which are mainly concerning to only copyright problems. Lifelong ban is I think only for very bad terror and vandalizing problems which Commons and many Wiki projects have.Problem with copyright is that it is different in many cases. Public places inside or outside, currency, postal stamps it different situation in different countries. I am glad that User:Taivio lifted the ban to one month ban only--Paasikivi (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Communist Youth League of Finland manifesto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 23:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:MapoftheOperationEntebberoute1976.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Non-AlignedSummitIndianPostageStamp1983.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 14:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Deleted content

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello Paasikivi/Archive 1, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:100ThaiBahtNote(reverse) 01.JPG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Helsinginkeskustailmakuva 13.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Finniar aircraft Helsinki-Vantaa-International-Airport 2016 09.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Paasikivi,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:1Canadiandollar2DollarCanadien1Canadiandollar2DollarCanadien.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Mindmatrix 17:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:1Canadiandollar2DollarCanadien1Canadiandollar3DollarCanadien.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Mindmatrix 17:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:MS SiljaSerenadeKatajanokanedustalla 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 16:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

File:1980 Summer Olympics boycotting countries blue.png

Hey!

In this map, European part of Turkey isn't colored. I'm warning to edit this. Thanks ! ZoRCoCuK (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I check the map and I have corrected the Turkey error but same time found more errors so I also corrected them. You will the errors after I download the new corrected map. Thanks. --Paasikivi (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

File:1976_Summer_Olympics_boycotting_countries_blue.png

Hi, regarding this boycott, it is not clear why Afghanistan, Albania and Syria did not attend, but since they are not listed here http://library.la84.org/OlympicInformationCenter/OlympicReview/1976/ore109/ore109h.pdf or here http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/17/newsid_3555000/3555450.stm it seems that their non-participation has more to with economic reasons or isolationism than with a boycott.1982vdven (talk) 19:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

The boycott was made by African and Caribbean countries. Taiwan also boycotted but because of it's status. Iraq also didn't addend. I will move Iraq, Afghanistan, Albania and Syria from from the map. --Paasikivi (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Iraq did join the African-led boycott according to the links above, so you can keep Iraq in there.1982vdven (talk)

India prohibition states map - Bihar

Hello alcohol ban was reimposed in Bihar on 2 October following a new order given by the Bihar government (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article9176241.ece). Can you please highlight Bihar as blue again in File:Alcohol prohibition in Indian states and union territories (Gujarat, Kerala and Nagaland and Union Territory of Lakshadweep).png? Thank you. 117.220.22.148 05:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Princeromanov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maksmilian (talk) 00:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
File:WHOPostageStamp1985.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Philafrenzy (talk) 12:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Urhokekkonenmuistomerkkilähde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Heikkikastemaa (talk) 11:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

File:CSCE-Conference-Madrid-1980-Postage Stamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

File:IndianUNPostageStamp1985 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:10SwedishkronaNote(reverse).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:CypriotUNHeadquatersPostageStamp1985 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, DriscollAmok (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kumumuseumintallinnnestonia01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WikedKentaur (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Kumumuseumintallinnnestonia03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WikedKentaur (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Kumumuseumtallinnestonia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WikedKentaur (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Kalevala Hindi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gazal world (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

File:PuhemiesRafael-Paasio-1963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:5000Camdianrielnote02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunofficial1998 (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

File:French presidential election (1. round) results (including overseas) by region, 2002.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iniți (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

File:French presidential election (1. round) results (including overseas) by departament, 2002.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iniți (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Louvre Abu Dhabi inside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File:KingFaisalOfSaudiArabiaonTurkishPostageStamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

File:AgostinhoNetoAngolanPostageStamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 12:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:KuwaittowersKuwaitctiyDSCN1690.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Idw/layout Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

File:1SouthKoreanWonNote.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Ox1997cow (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Ox1997cow (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ox1997cow ([[User talk:Ox1997cow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Map

File:French Maastricht Treaty referendum results by departament (including overseas), 1992.png, which you created (and beautifully, I should add), gives New Caledonia in blue, but it voted very narrowly against, and so should be in red. Just thought you'd wish to know. Cheers! Template:UnsignedIP2

I will fix it. --Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Onnistuisiko Viitasaarelle avattavan uuden paloaseman valokuvaus?

Olen tehnyt Wikipedian puolelle Keski-Suomen pelastuslaitoksen paloasemien esittelyartikkeleita. Onnistuisiko käydä kuvaamssa Viitasaaren uusi paloasema kun se lähiviikkoina avataan? Kiitos! --MailariX ([[User talk:MailariX|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Can you edit your map and add boundaries for the newly created Ladakh UT? LéKashmiriSocialiste ([[User talk:LéKashmiriSocialiste|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Htonl ([[User talk:Htonl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

New versions

Taisit olla suomenkielinen. Olisiko mahdollista noudattaa vanhaa periaatetta, että uudet kuvat ladataan uusilla nimillä tänne eikä korvata vanhoja kuvia ihan toisilla? --Pxos ([[User talk:Pxos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Kyllä se käy minulle.Minulla on vanhoja kuvia joita olen tallenntanut tänneja olen niitä myöhemmin muokanut paremmaksi. Uudet kuvat kyllä tallennan uutena.--Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Oletko huomannut, että kuviin jäävät kaikki vanhat tiedot? Otat kuvan vaikka Presidentinlinnasta ja sanot, että se on vuodelta 2005 ja että siinä on presidentinlinna. Tallennat samaan tiedostoon kuvan Kaupungintalosta uutena versiona, ja kuvan tiedoissa lukee edelleen, että on Presidentinlinna. Tallennat uuden kuvan vanhan päälle, mutta et muuta tietoja. Kaikki muuttuu silloin huonommaksi. --Pxos ([[User talk:Pxos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Olen kyllä pistänyt kuvan nimen siirtopyynnön niihin kuviin jossa on Presidentinlinna ja Kaupungintalo yhdessä tai erikseen.En tiedä mistä kuvasta tarkoitat.--Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Minulla oli yksi kuva [1] jossa on Helsingin kaupungintalo kuvattuna mutta kuvan otsikossa lukee Korkeimmanoikeudenrakennus. Olen tehnyt siirto pyynnön kuvan nimelle Helsinki City Hall (Helsingin kaupungintalo). --Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Samat sanat. Commonsissa voi ladata uuden version samasta tiedostosta. Pxos tarkoitti ilmeisesti tätä kuvaa: File:Supreme Court of Finland Suomen Korkein Oikeus Högsta Domstoleni Finland.jpg. Latasit vanhan kuvan päälle vallan eri kuvan, joka aiheutti suunnatonta hämminkiä loppukäyttöpaikassa eli suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa. Tiedoston historian alla Commonsin kuvasivulla lukee: "Tallenna uusi versio tästä tiedostosta." Ei pidä ladata uusia tai vanhoja versioita jostain toisesta tiedostosta. Uudet kuvat tallennetaan uudella nimellä. Terveisin -- Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Ja se suunnaton hämminki on täällä. --Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Renek78 ([[User talk:Renek78|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, Template:T2 is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the Template:T2 template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:15, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Presidents' grave markers/ Presidenttien hautamuistomerkit

I'd like to inform that in the Category:Graves of Finnish presidents in Hietaniemi Cemetary several grave markers (Mannerheim, Paasikivi, Koivisto, Kekkonen) are work of notable artists (Wäinö Aaltonen 2*, Perttu Saksa, Harry Kivijärvi) and copyrighted. These photos should not be in Commons. Kiinnittäisin huomiota siihen, että Category:Graves of Finnish presidents in Hietaniemi Cemetary -kategoriassa on tunnettujen taiteilijoiden tekijänoikeudella suojattuja töitä, eikä niitä olisi pitänyt tallentaa Commonsiin.--Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

@Htm: These are not covered by FOP per COM:FOP Finland. Please tag the ones for which you have artists' names and lifetimes, including that information.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
I know, I'll do it soon. Didn't have time in the morning, got to go to work. -- Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:09, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
@Htm: Thanks.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 19:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Koskeeko Freedom of panorama for Public interiors hautakiviä? Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Koskeeko Freedom of panorama for Public interiors hautakiviä? Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kommentti Käyttäjä:Htm että Suomessa on hautausmailla kuvaaminen sallittua koska kyseessä on julkinen paikka. Lisää tietoa saa tästä linkistä https://www.suomenkirkkojajahautausmaita.fi/ohjeistus Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Koskeeko Freedom of panorama for Public interiors hautakiviä? Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kommentti Käyttäjä:Htm että Suomessa on hautausmailla kuvaaminen sallittua koska kyseessä on julkinen paikka. Lisää tietoa saa tästä linkistä https://www.suomenkirkkojajahautausmaita.fi/ohjeistus Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kyllä minä sen tiedän, mutta kyse ei ole kuvaamisesta, vaan kuvan julkaisusta Commonsissa ja kuvan edelleenkäytöstä. Nuo kolme valokuvaa ovat tekijänoikeuden suojaamista taideteoksista. Ne eivät ole mitä tahansa matkalaukkuhautakiviä. Taideteoskuvia ei voi julkaista Commonsissa, koska täällä julkaistuja kuvia pitää saada käyttää myös kaupallisesti ilman mitään eri lupia. Tallenna taideteoskuvat suomenkieliseen Wikipediaan, niitä voi käyttää siellä tekijänoikeuslain sallimissa rajoissa. Niitä täytetään silloin kun artikkelin aihe liittyy kuvaan. Artikkeliin taideteoksesta voi laittaa kuvan/kuvia siitä teokssta. Artikkeliin taitelijasta voi laittaa kuvia hänne taideteoksistaan. Kuvituskuvina niitä ei ole ollut tapana käyttää. Artikkelin pitää liittyä taideteokseen, joka on kuvassa. -- Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Löysin Elämää hautausmaalla blogista tiedon siitä että Helsingin hallinto-oikeus on antanut lainvoimaisen päätöksn No 09/1083/2 jossa todetaan että hautakivien kuvaaminen ja kuvien julkaiseminen internetissä on laillista. Lisätietoa saa varmaan ottamalla yhtyeden Helsingin hallinto-oikeuteen kysymällä lisätietoa kysesestä päätöksestä. Tuon Elämää hautausmalla blogin linkki löytyy tästä: http://elamaahautausmaalla.blogspot.com/2015/11/olen-saanut-kysymyksen-koskien.html?m=1 Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Ymmärsinkö oikein että nuo kolme hautakiveä Paasikiven, Kekkosen ja Koiviston haudoista vain syytä käyttää vain niissä artikkeleissa jotka liittyvät niihin oleellisesti eli tässä tapauksessa itse henkilöihin Paasikiveen, Kekkoseen ja Koivistoon sekä todennäköisesti artikkeliin Hietaniemen hautausmaa? Jos kuvat ovat "väärin" julkaistu commonsissa eri lisenssi oikeuden kohdalla eikö ole järkevää muuttaa ne eri lisenssille? Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
En ole nähnyt kyseistä hallinto-oikeuden päätöstä, mutta käsittääkseni siinä on ollut kyse lähinnä yksityisyyden suojasta ja henkilötietolain tulkinnasta. Kaikki ihmiset eivät halua sukunsa ja perheensä hautakiviä henkilötietoineen julkisuuteen. Hallinto-oikeus otti kantaa siihen, saako kuvan julkaista ilman hautakiven omistajan suostumusta. Ilmeisesti jotkut ihmiset ovat halunneet hautakiviensä kuvia pois ko. kuvastoista. Hallinto-oikeus on ollut sitä mieltä, että ei tarvitse poistaa. Toki saa poistaa. Tietysti ko sivustojen pitäjien yleisestä hienotunteisuudesta riippuu, poistetaanko kuvia toivomuksesta vai ei. Esimerkiksi Wikimedia Commonsissa henkilöiden kuvia poistetaan kuvissa esiintyneiden henkilöiden pyynnöstä, vaikka mikään pakko ei ole. Mutta hautamuistomerkit voivat olla myös taideteoksia, merkkihenkilöiden ja muidenkin haudoilla on veistoksia ja muita tavallisesta matkalaukkumallisesta hautakivestä eroavia muistomerkkejä. Ne ovat taideteoksia ja niistä otettujen valokuvien jälleenkäytölle on säännöt tekijänoikeuslaissa. Helsingin hallinto-oikeuden päätökset eivät koske tekijänoikeuslain tulkintaa. Mitä tulee kaiken maailman blogeihin, joissa nimettömät ja osoitteettomat ihmiset kirjoittelevat, niin yleisesti niiden luotettavuus on kyseenalainen. Samoin se verkkosivusto, johon olet linkittänyt (Suomen kirkkoja ja hautausmaita) on kuvauksesta päätellen kahden nimettömän yksityishenkilön harrastuksen tulos. Verkkosivun omistaja ei ole tiedossa. Sivu ja sillä esitetyt mielipiteet palvelevat ilmeisesti jotain suljettua Facebook-ryhmää, jossa julkaistaan hautakivikuvia. Nimettömien ihmisten sivustojen luottoarvo on aina tuntematon. Sinun olisi tullut kuitenkin lukea poistopyyntöjen perustelut: valokuvat esittävät taideteoksia, joiden tekijänoikeus on vielä voimassa. Commonsissa ei julkaista valokuvia taideteoksista, jotka ovat tekijänoikeuden suojaamia, koska kuvia ei voisi käyttää kaupallisesti. Commonsiin tallennettuja kuvia on voitava saada käyttää myös kaupallisesti. Kovinkaan oleellista ei ole se, sijaitseeko taideteos hautausmaalla tai sen vieressä. Tiedät kyllä, että fi-wikiin voi tallentaa taideteoskuvia. Taideteoksen ja artikkelin välillä pitää olla yhteys. Kuvia voi käyttää artikkeleissa taideteoksista ja artikkeleista niiden kuvanveistäjästä. Fi-wikissä onoltu aika puritaanisia taideteoskuvien käytöstä muissa yhteyksissä. Lisenssistä: Commonsissa ei riitä lisenssin muuttaminen, kyseessä on väärä projekti. Tallenna Fi-wikiin. Kekkosen muistomerkistä ei ole artikkelia. Sen voi kirjoittaa ja siinä artikkelissa voi julkaista kuvan hautakivestä. Htm ([[User talk:Htm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
No ei kai tässä sitten ole mitään sen kummempaa. Poista nuo Paasikiven,Kekkosen ja Koiviston hautamuistomerkit jos ne rikkovat tekijänoikeuksia. Paasikivi ([[User talk:Paasikivi#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)