User talk:A1Cafel/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please be more careful when nominating images of toys and dolls for deletion. Some of them may be public domain (e.g. in the US: published before 1925, or before 1978 without a copyright notice) or were clearly handmade by the photographer. I would recommend only nominating toys which were commercially manufactured in the last few decades, or are derivative of a copyrighted character. -- King of ♥ 20:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Again you have nominated an old doll with just the rationale "Per COM:TOYS": Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blueeyes-Elena.JPG. It appears to have been made in 1926 and sent from the US to Japan in 1927. There is no copyright notice on the doll, so ultimately it depends on whether the dolls can be considered "published" for the purposes of US law at the time. In any case, your rationale is wholly inadequate so I have closed your DR without prejudice. Whenever you nominate a toy that appears to be more than a few decades old, you must give a more detailed explanation as to why you think it is copyrighted, beyond simply citing COM:TOYS. -- King of ♥ 15:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Flickrreview for old art

Hi! There are no need to ask for a Flickrreview for files like this because it is not likely that someone that died in 1824 or 1870 have an account on Flickr. Therefore it is not likely that the uploader on Flickr is the copyright holder if any copyright exist. So all that is relevant is if the painting is still copyrighted or not. --MGA73 (talk) 09:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Bt-spd (50057534427).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 18:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Categorize FOP deletion requests

Good day (evening here in the Philippines). I can notice in your contributions about deletion requests. Please categorize FOP-related deletion nominations by grouping them under relevant categories under Category:FOP-related deletion requests (e.g. "<noinclude>[[Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude>"). I added categories to much of your DR's that remain uncategorized from February 2020 to this month, including the closed ones (uncategorized resulted them to becoming "orphan" and not immediately accessible, thereby denying any future potential undeletions or changes in decisions with regards to erratic FOP statuses around the world, as well as potential future reference to past FOP-related discussions). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello again. Please categorize FOP-related DR's according to relevant categories under Category:FOP-related deletion requests (e.g. "<noinclude>[[Category:Canadian FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude>"). The FOP DR's get "orphan" (or uncategorized) if these aren't categorized. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Again and again, please categorize all FOP-related DR's that you commenced. Using the ff. syntax <noinclude>[[:Category: x FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude>, where x stands for the relevant country or region as categorized at Category:FOP-related deletion requests. Although not mandatory, categorization is required to make FOP DR's more accessible and to facilitate discussions, as well as the possibility of undeletion if the country implements FOP or if the work becomes public domain. All copyrighted works like murals have copyright durations, which vary by country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
@JWilz12345: I have done it since your first notification. However, throughout these years I have made hundreds of DR related to FOP/Toys/DW, please give me some time to do it. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Ernest Moniz visited Prague in March 2014 (cropped1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ernest Moniz visited Prague in March 2014 (cropped3).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ernest Moniz visited Prague in March 2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Australian Freedom of Panorama

Hello - can you please stop nominating Australian images of permanent artworks and claiming Australian law does not allow freedom of panorama for graphic works until you have checked that is correct. It seems to be allowed for works of "artistic craftsmanship" that can include paintings and murals (see (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 (definition (c), which doesn't restrict paintings, etc. (it used to but that is not the definition now)). I'd suggest staying away from this area unless you know what you are doing. Deus et lex (talk) 09:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@Deus et lex: It is a misunderstanding. The section (c) is based on the works of "artistic craftsmanship". Please see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in_ window.JPG for further information. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
@A1Cafel: , it is not a misunderstanding and that discussion tells you absolutely nothing, you really need to stop quoting things that you know nothing about. Works of artistic craftsmanship refers to the purpose and creation of the work, it has nothing to do with its type. I'd strongly recommend (in the kindest way possible) you stay away from these debates unless you have a better understanding of Australian law and how it works. Deus et lex (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Cmt of a page watcher: @Deus et lex and A1Cafel: , IMO it's best for both of you to discuss at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Australia#Reference to UK FoP rules about this matter, for a single forum. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Though it is clear A1Cafel has zero knowledge of COM:De minimis, there are some deletion requests that never should’ve been made. Bidgee (talk) 21:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:De minimis is a concept, not a loophole on keeping images. The standard of de minimis varies from person to person. In the marginal cases (COM:DM#5), I think it is worth opening a DR to discuss DM. I totally welcome and respect every rational inputs from different users. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
We all know that it is a concept, it was you who called it a loophole. What I’m talking about is commonsense, which appears to be lacking when you nominate with the same old reason over and over, without thinking if the “art” is a major or minor part of the photograph. In some cases the “artwork” is a minor part, in very small cases trivial.
If you have a problem with de Minimis, raise it on the talk page or take it to VP. Maybe your DR restrictions should be made stricter again. Bidgee (talk) 05:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Not just me saying DM is a loophole. How can this be qualified as de minimis? DM has two main determinants.
  1. The copyrighted object is not the reason of taking the photos
  2. Removing the copyrighted object will not make the derivative work useless. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Though you implied that I was using it as a loophole, which I'm not. If you don't think DM should exist, go to the talk page or VR to have it removed. This is of a garage in Eugowra (prominent subject). The building isn't copyrightable, removing the "2D" artwork is possible and is the least prominent object. While using the opinion of the "no FoP for 2D graphic works", this could be fixed with the removal of the artwork, however it (the "artwork") is far more prominent. I do agree with comments elsewhere, the opinions of Australia lacking FoP for 2D works is just that (opinions), my push with the Foundation and local chapter has been to get legal advice from those who deal with copyright law in Australia. Bidgee (talk) 09:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm not saying DM shouldn't exist. I found that in recent days more and more users seems to "abuse" this concept. Taking the example that you give, honestly I don't think remove the mural will not make the derivative work useful. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Again you are implying that I'm abusing the concept. If I was, I would be applying to all the DR relating to Australian FoP, which I have not. How so, why isn't it useful? Bidgee (talk) 09:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
As I have mentioned before, the concept of DM can be interpreted differently by different users. I'm just talking about my opinion, and I have no means to force anyone to accept my thoughts. However, your statement sounds that I can't open a DR on talking DM, which I disagree with that. At the end, if an admin believed that the files can be kept under DM, then I respect the decision. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
@JWilz12345: - happy to debate on the other page, but I have made it clear here A1Cafel should not be participating in it (or deleting images on that basis). He has contributed nothing constructive to that debate. Deus et lex (talk) 11:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Несправедливый рапорт

Здравствуйте, очень интересно, что Вы делаете в русской Википедии. Обращаюсь к Вам по причине того, что якобы я нарушил авторские права в связи с этой картинки - File:Jungledyret Hugo.jpg Во-первых, это был всего лишь ЧЕРНОВИК, а не статья. Во-вторых, я не прикреплял файл к черновику. Как итог, требую отмены жалобы на мой аккаунт. SlavaMK1 (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Burj Dubai (2874285211).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.92 17:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Burj Dubai, lavori in corso (2971461652).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.92 17:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Trevi Fountain (Unsplash nNA1obWUSpA).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

137.189.220.134 09:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

File:DSC 0968 Black Lives Matter Memorial in Davis, CA (49978426483).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 18:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Burj Dubai (2316145289).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:16, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Burj Dubai (2346892501).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Burj Dubai (2346892503).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:15.PennStation.BaltimoreMD.5June2020 (50068273676).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:14a.PennStation.BaltimoreMD.5June2020 (50067718673).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:13.PennStation.BaltimoreMD.5June2020 (50068533662).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:12a.PennStation.BaltimoreMD.5June2020 (50068499717).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:97a.WalkTo.PPA.BaltimoreMD.6June2020 (50027805837).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:41, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:96a.WalkTo.PPA.BaltimoreMD.6June2020 (50027544766).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:98a.WalkTo.PPA.BaltimoreMD.6June2020 (50027003983).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

File:82a.WalkTo.PPA.BaltimoreMD.6June2020 (50027412616).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Lady Gaga in Athens (15268783066).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:-DumpTrump (48001343641).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:DW of copyrighted doll, not on permmanet public display per COM:FOP#United Kingdom
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:-DumpTrump (48001284337).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:DW of copyrighted doll, not on permmanent public display per COM:FOP#United Kingdom
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File:-DumpTrump (48001346588).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

119.237.234.201 04:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File:-DumpTrump (48001287597).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:1st of May in Sweden

Thank you for the contributions. Please note that there is a specific category for 1st of May events in Stockholm, where images taken in Stockholm could be suitably categorized, instead of reverting changes back to Category:1st of May in Sweden. Corestable (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Hello Comrades, Glory! (33333604705).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

116.48.224.107 04:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Smear Leader (27883316797).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

116.48.224.107 04:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I've modified the file a bit to address your concerns about freedom of panorama in Canada. Can you take a look to see if it is solved? Thank you! --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 02:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mike Rounds in Capitol Hill.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Remitamine.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for viewing and editing my photos. (Mostafameraji (talk) 05:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC))

File:Tallest tower vs. the palm trees (5373615733).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Aung san suu kyi libera italy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

137.189.220.154 04:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

deleted Eumetsat-based images

Hi, on 2020-11-11 you have requested deletion of 5 images :

(see User talk:En rouge#File:2020-09-16_1800_Aila+Alpha+Ianos_Eumetsat_Airmass_RGB.png)
because of a change of EUMETSAT license since 2019.
But you haven't provided a document, a link to this new license.

Today I've found the document EUMETSAT DATA POLICY [1], dated jan 2020.
On p.11/37 §2 Definition : '"Advanced Image Product": the combination of different channels allocating a colour to eachchannel (i.e. RGB) or the mathematical blending of several image layers.'

RGB composited images are the basis of my uploads

On p.13/37 §4 : 'EUMETSAT shall make [...] Advance Image Products available to all users world-wide on a free and unrestricted basis, [...] as "Essential" Data and Products'.

as a "free and unrestricted basis", it seems that the images I've uploaded are in accordance with licensing requirements on Commons.

Let me know... Yours, En rouge (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, please can you give an answer?
As @Polarlys: has deleted these images upon your request, notification to him is done here.
Without the requested explanation, I will ask for restoration, or do a new upload, for these images.
thanks, En rouge (talk) 14:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The terms of use of EUMETSAT stated that "Unless otherwise noted, you may download and copy content from the EUMETSAT website(s) for your own personal and non-commercial use. For any other use of the content, you must request authorisation from EUMETSAT." Non-commercial use doesn't fulfill Commons:Licensing. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
I see no reason to restore these uploads for the reason given by A1Cafel. Regards, --Polarlys (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@A1Cafel and Polarlys: sorry, but as stated above, there is a document giving some rules overriding "Unless otherwise noted"!
This document is in Legal Framework / Data Policy (eumetsat.int main menu)
Have a look at this document, at https://www-cdn.eumetsat.int/files/2020-05/pdf_leg_data_policy.pdf
because it give "free and unrestricted basis [availability] to all users world-wide", for "Advanced Image Product".
Yours, En rouge (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The terms of use are pretty clear (https://www.eumetsat.int/about-us/terms-use). --Polarlys (talk) 23:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

FvfBulacanHeritage0303 14.JPG

Hello. Is File:FvfBulacanHeritage0303 14.JPG de minimis compliant? While it may originally depict the mansion, I find curious why it was categorized in a category devoted to "graffiti" (though it is legally painted as per my experience here, on such wall paintings). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: It could be. I would say it falls on Commons:De minimis#Guidelines number 4. The murals is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image, but not important. (After blanking, the image is still potentially useful). --A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done pulling it out from Category:Graffiti in the Philippines, and adding {{De minimis}} tag. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Pokemon go (28276452461).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokemon go (28355062905).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon GO (27541305793).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:CJ playing Pokemon Go (36037034963).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go (27958598503).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:2016-07-07 hunting pokémon (27579839043).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32011554304).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32011555014).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32039847803).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32039848053).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32039848613).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32730924981).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pokémon Go Trainers at Odaiba Marine Park (32854677415).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjstepney (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

A question

Hi. I saw you opening DRs on some posters in Athens for -lack of- FoP/Greece. I did not see the unused file:Poster in Exarcheia 6.jpg among them, although it looks more elaborate than some you proposed for deletion. Best. --E4024 (talk) 03:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@E4024: Nominated. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

토론 참여 요청

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gocheok Sky Dome WBSC Premier 12 2019.jpg 토론에 참여해주시기를 부탁드립니다. 10여 건의 삭제 신청과 관련한 토론을 진행 중에 있습니다. (I ask you to participate in the discussion. Others are discussing more than 10 deletion applications here.) --Trainholic (talk) 05:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

temppro?

Just out of curiosity, what is the purpose of this edit? --Auntof6 (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Auntof6: Categorise the EP at COM:TER to allow template editors can also response/handle it. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Riga Tv Tower and Island bridge as seen from a railway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Fishing at Kura River in Tbilisi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 08:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Fourth plinth project-The End.jpg

Hi, You've requested the above file for deletion, but the section I've added it to specifically lists temporary displays. "Temporary" in this case means 2 years (not several days!), and the artwork exhibited is of cultural value. Please remove your deletion request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yyevtushenko (talk • contribs) 09:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Flight Magazine 28 Cover

Hello, my name is Julián Aristiqui and I am the designer of the magazine cover that photo that you just deleted will be used in a Wikipedia article for which I request the immediate restoration of the file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julian Aristiqui (talk • contribs) 09:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate and file types

Hi. I cannot speedy the same image when it is of a different file type. Generally they should be acceptable anyway and gives users choice for what they are wanting to do.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Missing permissions

Hi A1Cafel, you tagged several images I uploaded as requiring permission. A couple of them are from a batch I uploaded from English Wikipedia in my early days here, and I have no additional information for them. The rest are uploaded from publications with licenses compatible with Commons. As far as I understand, we don't need permission in order to host them. Can you be more specific about what you're looking for? Ajpolino (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

To be more specific, File:Tabah, et al BU panel Cameroon.tif, File:Early signs of BU.png, File:Category III Buruli ulcer.tif, File:Severe Buruli ulcer - Australia.tif, File:Category I Buruli ulcer.tif, File:Ringtail possum with M. ulcerans infection.jpg, File:Buruli endemic area - Ghana.tif, File:Plasmodium knowlesi merozoite.jpg, File:Earl O'Roke.jpg, File:Plasmodium knowlesi smears IDC.png, File:Clement Markert 1991.jpg, File:Joseph Heitman.tif, File:Vilém Dušan Lambl Portrait.tif, File:Giardia trophozoites Giemsa.tif, File:Leucocytozoon sabrazesi gametocytes from blood of domestic chicken.tif, and File:Plasmodium cynomolgi liver stage.jpg are all released under a Creative Commons Attribution license. To verify, go to the source link for each, and CTRL+F to search for "Creative Commons" (the declaration is not always at the very top or very bottom of the page). Ajpolino (talk) 01:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ajpolino: Removed the tag for those I can find CC license on the page. Thanks for you clarification. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick response. In fact, I hadn't noticed that a few of the images were actually released under CC-0, so I'm glad for the second set of eyes. Cheers. Ajpolino (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
For File:Plasmodium knowlesi smears IDC.png I've clarified where you can find the license verification at the talk page. Ajpolino (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done--A1Cafel (talk) 00:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File da cancellare

Caro A1Cafel, grazie per il tuo avviso nella mia talk. Ti risponderò appena possibile. Tutti i file da te elencati sono miei scatti di fotografia. A presto!--Fcarbonara (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bogotá cityscape with BD Bacatá.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 23:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Gevora Hotel poolside and Dubai skyline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Lesbijki.jpg

Hi,

You have provided a template about derivative work for file Lesbijki.jpg on Commons. In fact it's not derivative, this is the actual work - the poster used in media campaign (which is composed of different elements, including photo). Kocio (talk) 10:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Kocio: As mentioned in the description. The image was obtained from www.kampania.org.pl. Permission from the copyright holder is needed. You may submit the permission to OTRS. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
It is also mentioned that there was with permission of Robert Biedroń. He was a president of Campaign Against Homophobia, which organized the action. --Kocio (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Dubai skylines (Pixabay 4010834).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Trevi fountain statue (Pixabay 4675791).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: File:Popular da Tarde em 1973.jpg

Good morning. I deleted the copyright violation tag on File:Popular da Tarde em 1973.jpg, but can you explain further why that might be a copyright violation? As far as I know there's no copyright violation on the picture of a newspaper front page. Best regards, 2804:14C:132:83A8:C100:5B1B:2147:C4EC 09:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Indonesians with newspaper.jpg

Dear A1Cafel. I blurred the image of the newspaper with Photoshop. Please remove the template. Виктор Пинчук (talk) 15:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Files in Stuart Wolfe's Commons

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indian_dancer_II_by_Stuart_Wolfe.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indian_dancer_III_by_Stuart_Wolfe.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indian_dancer_IV_by_Stuart_Wolfe.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indian_dancer_VI_by_Stuart_Wolfe.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stuart_Wolfe_The_artist%27s_studio_3.jpg

Hi A1Cafel, in 2019 I created the article in personal contact to the artist Stuart Wolfe (aka Wiki user "stw-kunst") and took photos of his works in his Berlin Studio. Since December 2019, Wikimedia is informed about this fact. So we already clarified the questions in 2019. Why do you ask the same doubts again? Here comes once more the 2019 link to the artist's selfie photo where he authorizes me, Smokeonthewater, to use the photos of his work for Wiki: https://my.hidrive.com/lnk/aC4UL8Uc So please, do not delete these photos! Smokeonthewater (talk) 18:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello A1Cafel, I am the artist, Stuart Wolfe. Herewith I confirm the use of all photos by Smokeonthewater showing my work directly and in my studio. Stw-kunst (talk) 12:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
@Stw-kunst: It is better for you to submit a permission to OTRS to avoid confustion. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

File:10.000 Moving Cities, Augmented Reality Multiplayer Game.png

Dear A1Cafel, I would like to request for undeletion of the 4 files:

  • File:10.000 Moving Cities, Augmented Reality Multiplayer Game.png
  • File:Unfiltered – Tiktok and the Emerging Face of Culture.jpg
  • File:Mobile-App-for-interactive-Installations.jpg
  • File:COVID-19 Reflection.png

As recommended, one week ago, I sent the justification for: request undeletion. Since I haven't heard anything yet, I wanted to ask you how I could get this expedited. Many thanks for your efforts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsgoeins (talk • contribs) 14:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

@Einsgoeins: You should submit an email permission to OTRS--A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Donald Trump did 10 days of "Mooch" controversy during July 2017 (33551582085).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.23 08:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout 219.78.190.23 08:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Idw/layout Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Idw/layout Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Total eclipse in gorbea 2020

Hello, you deleted the photo of a total eclipse in the city of Gorbea, 2020.

My name is Ricardo Parra and I am the author of that photograph.

The alleged copyright infringement is because I also uploaded it to my personal facebook.

I would like to know what is the procedure to follow to be able to upload the image to wikipedia commons again.

The archive: File:Eclipse total Gorbea 2020.jpg

pd: I would also like to know what is the procedure so that anyone can use the image, since I consider it as a great contribution to science.

Saludos desde Chile. Template:Unsigned2

Template:Ping You should send an email permission to OTRS to verify your identity. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

FoP

Hi. FoP? --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping Maybe de minimis? --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate De728631 ([[User talk:De728631|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate De728631 ([[User talk:De728631|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Juan Ricondo An American Affair

Hi A1Cafel, my name is Juan Ricondo. I’ve recently received a message from ‪you saying that my wikimedia commons account will be blocked because I don’t have the rights of the images uploaded. I can also see that some other images have been “warned” for copyrighting issues but all of them had been approved long ago by an OTRS member and they are in the permission archive. So please check the actual image file and you will see everything is correct. If the warning message is still there, must be a non updated page (that's what a wikimedia librarian told me). I do have the permission from the photographers to use all the images in my account and I sent the written permission to the "permissions department" long ago and actually I just did it again (please let me know where should I send you the document if you needed). I am the holder of the full copyright of the original images.

Could you please fix this misunderstanding? Thanks --77.228.23.218 11:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Juan Ricondo.

Template:Autotranslate (`・ω・´) (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate (`・ω・´) (talk) 01:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. What right do you have over files that have been accepted? --Cjp24 ([[User talk:Cjp24|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

In addition, the titles, captions and categories no longer match. It was very good, adapted and accepted before your operation! --Cjp24 ([[User talk:Cjp24|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Please cancel all your overwrite operations for files in this category. Regards. --Cjp24 ([[User talk:Cjp24|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I am not an original uploader, I have corrected contrast of the images I didn't uploaded. Please don't place warnings at my talk page as it is senseless, images past or images future is not interesting for me, but this kind of warnings are making me a sort of 'hooligan' who is an illegal content uploader. Thank you, Bogomolov.PL ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping The system defaults that the uploader would receive the DR notice, no matter you are the original uploader or not. If you don't want it and you are not the original uploader, simply remove the notice. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
I have no right to remove this sort notices but you have this right. Bogomolov.PL ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Posted on your user page: I am lens queen.lens queen photography is my page

Template:Autotranslate Ox1997cow ([[User talk:Ox1997cow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Commons

Hi,

Hope you are well. I have seen that you have recently active in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This page is currently the only page where user problems (conduct issues, and other unacceptable behavior, etc.) get reported.

I am working on facilitating the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement discussion on Commons which focuses users’ conduct. That is why I am inviting to participate in the discussion to give your valuable opinion.

You can do so by participating in the public on-wiki discussion on Commons: Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. There are a few questions regarding enforcement you can answer. Please feel free to include anything you find relevant.

I also encourage you to participate in the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeK7gTSZ2PSNiekEKPcC2UvnkJaQt8iVPWRXZbk27U9E8fOIQ/viewform

The survey has a different set of questions, and you can response to them anonymously. It is not a long survey and should take around 10 minutes to complete.

I want you to know that your input is very valuable and it will help to us better shape the UCoC enforcement pathways for our beloved Commons community. I hope you participate. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) ([[User talk:Wikitanvir (WMF)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Erase my own images and block my account

Hello Template:Ping. Well, my last uploaded files were all maps within public domain based in OpenStreetMap. All works are mine because I made them for my page for Wikibooks that I created Cálculo de un Eclipse Solar y Lunar. Ocultación y Tránsito. The outlined and curves lines for the eclipses and ocultations are based from my works too, from the own design form this MS-Excel sheets! Example: Eclipse Solar Total del 02.07.2019. Please it is no reason to block me and erease all files again! I did not violate any copyright, again the works are mine! Sincerely yours. Fernando de Gorocica ([[User talk:Fernando de Gorocica|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Templating talkpages

Hi, A1Cafel. If some user does not relapse into uploading copyvios, and they say they are gonna correct their uploads (and they apparently did that)... it does not make much sense templating their talkpage a week later. It only creates fear and confusion, as you can see here: [2]. Strakhov ([[User talk:Strakhov|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

You moved the Category:Protests during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany to Category:Protests related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. That was bad because this category contains all protests during the pandemic, despite their topic has anything to do with the pandemic. So the new name is totally misleading. Of course you are free to create an other category for protests related to the pandemic. --GPSLeo ([[User talk:GPSLeo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Minoraxtalk 15:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Independence Monument Phnom Penh.jpg

Hi A1Cafel, can you point out what was wrong with my upload (File:Independence Monument Phnom Penh.jpg) so that I can upload it again correctly? Regs--Sal73x ([[User talk:Sal73x|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Independence Monument (Phnom Penh) for the reason. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Tagged deletion

Can you tell me what is the problem with this image? Dandarmkd ([[User talk:Dandarmkd|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping Non-free screenshots (a kind of derivative works)--A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
A1Cafel, I will ask you again, what is the problem with this image? Be specific. Dandarmkd ([[User talk:Dandarmkd|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Template:Ping That's the reason. You may look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Уредувачки маратон (12.11.2020) 5.png for further info. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
A1Cafel, it basically says nothing on that page, just that you tagged the image for deletion. Thanks, but no thanks for the 'well explained answer'. Dandarmkd ([[User talk:Dandarmkd|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Is this de minimis or "intentional"?

Is File:7501Shrine of Saint Andrew Kim Bulacan Philippines 08.jpg de minimis-compliant or is it intentional to include the entire 2010s-shrine in the background? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping I think DM still applies here. "Copyrighted work X is visible, but not identifiable." I have seen a few images under this situation, and they are not nominated for DR.--A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 116.48.250.98 07:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 116.48.250.98 07:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.78.191.100 14:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bidgee ([[User talk:Bidgee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello! One question: What sources do you think, are these photos from, if not from government? [3] Greetings, --JPF ([[User talk:J. Patrick Fischer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping At least you provide the URL of the photos as verification. You cannot assume everyone knows the source is from East Timor government. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
You even have marked a regional flag, insignias of ministeries and posters with the goverment seal... --JPF ([[User talk:J. Patrick Fischer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I have been informed that you marked File:OrlenaNJSnow 2021-02-03.jpg as a copyright violation because the file from which it had been extracted was deleted. The file from which it was extracted wasn't deleted as a copyright violation, so derivative works do not need to be deleted as copyright violations. Template:Ping would you like the derivative file to be restored or kept deleted ? Nick ([[User talk:Nick|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you end this discussion?

I want to end this discussion.

Commons:Deletion requests/NoFoP templates

This discussion hasn't been getting new opinions for nearly a month. And I will take the following steps as raised in this discussion.

NoFoP templates are moved to NoFoP Category. And add a notice that NoFoP templates can only be used for photos of general cityscapes or for photos that can be used, excluding copyrighted parts.

However, there are parts that are difficult to do on my own, so I need help from several users.

Can you end this discussion?

Ox1997cow ([[User talk:Ox1997cow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping I'm not an admin. I cannot close a controversial DR. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Oh, I misunderstood you as an administrator. I'm sorry. --Ox1997cow ([[User talk:Ox1997cow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)