User talk:Murdockcrc

Welcome to the Commons, Murdockcrc!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Ambulancia01.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 01:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ambulancia01.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ambulancia01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Magnus Manske 21:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Network-templates_large.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Network-templates_large.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jgaray 13:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Enrico Ferri.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tom_Clancy_-_The_Cardinal_of_the_Kremlin_cover.jpg

Image:Tom_Clancy_-_The_Cardinal_of_the_Kremlin_cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SkierRMH 02:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago Bianco from Diavolezza 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Generally good, especially given the difficult lighting conditions, but seems tilted CCW (see e.g. pylons at left), and I think there's some vignetting in the corners. All correctable. --Avenue 01:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC). Now corrected according to the given suggestions. --Murdockcrc 17:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
QI now. Nice scene. --Avenue 07:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just have a look

Hello, just have a loo, please - Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#November_26.2C_2010.--G eorge, 17:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte San Salvatore LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really nice.--Gaeser 16:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

scope change

I have updated the scope to include the places of worship explicitly Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Angela_Hennig_Kosovo_Ferizaj_2008_171.jpg Mdupont (talk) 05:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monte San Salvatore in Lugano, Switzerland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:St Moritz Muottas.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Moritz Muottas.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Île d'Or.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Nazare 001.jpg

Hallo Luis

Vielen Dank für die Komplimente. Du darfst das Bild gerne als FP nominieren.

Gruss zurück aus Zürich!

Markus

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte San Salvatore LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Hi

Hi Murdockcrc!
I am assured of Your honesty and I try to assume always good resolves at each person. Please, don't do hasty acts as you are angered and offended. For our project and our society Your contributions, Your knowledge and skills are very necessary. Very often misunderstanding can be perceived as hostile action, however it isn't war in a reality.
Please, don't abandon the Wikimedia project and don't do nominations for deletion for Yours pictures.

Very friendly, Yours faithfully --George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?

I guess there is here a strong misunderstanding.
Please don't give up.--Jebulon (talk) 11:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Luis debe quedarse!

Luis debe quedarse! El hecho de que fueron atacados. Si no te parecen escapar. Incluso si usted no sabe, usted tiene amigos, y tenemos el placer de apoyo. Ya ven lo que se ha logrado es un proyecto maravilloso. ¿Ha olvidado los hombres y ver la obra --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept all

Hi Luis!
I have kept all Your photos. There are no more any active deletion requirements of Your photos. And I have more look to Your uploads. Excellent photos, very professional and very nice. We all wait for new fine photos from You. Please, continue cooperation with Commons.

Very friendly, George --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support and Keep--Jebulon (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your tribute, and thank you especially for staying. You won a big battle ... against yourself. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add to the good words here - I also look forward to seeing many good contributions from you :) Regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser result

A checkuser request has been asked by me. The result is here -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1 600 × 1 200 = 1 920 000

HI, The image has almost 2mp, 1 600 × 1 200 = 1 920 000, it is missing only 80k. we can resample the image to 2mp with gimp if need be. thanks, mike

Mdupont (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi we have uploaded a new version 3,072×2,304 (4.21 MB)

PLease reconsider. Thanks 16:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you ! I'm not sure I deserve this one, but it's very kind of you !--Jebulon (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luis!

Thank You! I will wish You pleasure only from involvement in the Commons projects.

With best regards, friendly --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hum hum in QIC

Hi Murdockcrc

Well well well

As your "withdraws" in QIC were nor made carefully, neither according to the technical rules, i have considered that they were not valid, and...

...(I'm pretty embarrassed)...

I removed your withdraw, and decided to promote two images of you as QI...

I hope you will not be angry for that...

Have a nice sunday.--Jebulon (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, no offense taken ;-)

Murgjo Sharr Mountain Dog Nedi Limani

please check the retouched lighting.

and reconsider.thanks Mdupont (talk) 12:32, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About this picture

Hello Costa-Rician Murdock

I've tried to improve the caption of this picture:

Your link to enWP was wrong, I've corrected it.

I added french caption with links to french WP.

I've provided a geocode (please correct if I'm wrong)

I've add it in the category "Schloss Laufen".

Salut !--Jebulon (talk) 18:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solferino LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a bit foggy in background, but otherwise good. Useful. French caption added.--Jebulon 01:26, 18 December 2010 (UTC) I added the geocode, requirement in VIC --Jebulon 01:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Generoso LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, IMO--Jebulon 01:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Moritz Muottas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Taken with Canon EOS 5D Mark II. Should have larger resolution. --kallerna 11:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Good IMO --Jebulon 01:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Solferino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uetliberg LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! --kallerna 12:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Salvatore Chiesa LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment EXIF-data says "Lens focal length: 50 mm". --kallerna 10:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting enough anyways. --kallerna 10:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC) Comment The lens used was a Samyang 8mm manual lens. It has no communication whatsoever with the camera. I have no idea how it got that info on the EXIF, it's perhaps a default number. --Murdockcrc 10:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ok. --kallerna 15:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

* * * :) * * *

Merry Christmas and happy New Year! I wish You all the best in New year!
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Uetliberg LCD.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Uetliberg LCD.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OEBB 1016 LCD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the sharpest one, but ok. --kallerna 13:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Murdockcrc!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Upper Belvedere LCD-curves.jpg was uncategorized on 22 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Svyato Mihailovsky Cathedral Izhevsk Russia Richard Bartz Alt.jpg was uncategorized on 1 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Techtalk

Hallo Murdockcrc. Ich habe dir nun [etwas verspätet :-)] auf meiner Diskussionsseite geantwortet. Beste Grüße  Richard  [®]  12:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Hi Luis, first of all thanks for your support on my Similan Island pic. Sadly you've voted on the "old" nomination page (see the comment by User:99of9) wich isn`t actuall anymore. Would you be so kind and vote again on this page?! I think the old page was still in your cache so you couldn't see my change... So sorry for the trouble and thanks again. best regards mathias K 09:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Besten Dank! :-) Gruß mathias K 10:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Over-categorization

Hello Murdockcrc, I've seen you have restored all the categories of your image File:De Zoeker LCD.jpg. Generally files should only be in the most specific category that exists for certain topic. Now your file is over-categorized, because Category:De Zoeker is a subcategory of Category:Zaanse Schans and of Category:Windmills by Category:Windmills in Zaanstad and its parent categories. As you have nominated this image in Valued Image candidates, I noticed this overcategorization. According to the VI criterion 6 (mandatory for a VI) and to the general recommandation Help:Category#For_more_appropriate_categorization and Help:Category#Over-categorization, I took the liberty of directly correcting it (because I wished to support your image), and I invite you to reconsider this move. You can place your file in various galleries anyway, for instance "Windmill". Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is highly recommended to always place an image in the most specific categories, and not in the levels above those. This rule is to avoid to fill up the top categories, which would make the search more difficult and painful. So always categorize your images in the most precise categories – you can choose several ones if your image illustrates several topics, provided that those categories are not branchs of the same tree (an example). That's the rule for the categories. But if it is a good image, it is absolutely possible to display it in whatever relevant galleries you want. Galleries are simple pages, like articles on Wikipedia, easily reachable by search requests. I've put your 'De Zoeker' image in the gallery "Windmill', in the section "The Netherlands". In a few days, I will add the labels tags on that gallery page if your image wins some of them, to show you. --Myrabella (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great image

Wonderful photograph of St. Moritz on the main page. Congrats. MarmadukePercy (talk) 00:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
De Zoeker.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Windmills in Zaanse Schans

Hello Murdockcrc,
In order to show you the differences and respective interests of galleries and categories, I've created a special gallery Windmills in Zaanse Schans, classified in both Category:Zaanse Schans and Category:Windmills in Zaanstad. To be useful, a gallery should not be too crowded and only contain a selection of pretty good images illustrating the topic in a relevant way. What do you think of this one ? :-) The next step will be to create a gallery for the windmill "De Zoeker", with a few selected views ; among them, of course, there will be the new Valued Image, with its seal - congratulations for it! I will show you. Best regards, --Myrabella (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the good work, it looks great! --Murdockcrc (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:De Zoeker LCD.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:De Zoeker LCD.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De Zoeker

Hello Murdockcrc,
Congratulations four your latest FP! Then I can complete the special training about galleries as promised :-)
Here is your image 'De Zoeker' in three different galleries, with the FP seal: Windmill#The_Netherlands, Windmills in Zaanse Schans, and a new one, De Zoeker. In this third gallery, I've added the VI seal, which is relevant here because a VI illustrates a precise scope, and the seal can be added in the caption of the VI in the gallery corresponding to that scope. Now your image has a good visibility and will be easily found by users interested in windmills, Zannse Schans or oilmills, all the more since it has been inserted in Wikipedia too. With kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you very much. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elisabethkirche Schneeberg

Dear colleague,

I would give you an update about my photo of the Elisabethkirche on the Schneeberg in Lower Austria. In the meantime, Amada44 has significantly improved the photo, so I would kindly invite you to give a hopefully favourable opinion on the FP candidature of this new version.

Many thanks and kind regards,

Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Costa Rica

¡Hola, Murdockcrc!

Estamos creando el capítulo Wikimedia Costa Rica, ¿te gustaría participar? Wikimedia Costa Rica (WM-CR) es una iniciativa para crear una asociación civil que promueva los proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia en Costa Rica. Buscamos personas comprometidas con Wikipedia u otros proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia para que se incorporen. Solo debes firmar en la lista de participantes, ¡y ya serás miembro!

Nuestra misión es facultar y animar a la gente de todo el país a reunir y desarrollar contenido educativo neutral bajo una licencia de contenido libre o en el dominio público, y a difundirlo de manera efectiva.

¿Conoces a otro costarricense o residente de Costa Rica que pueda participar? Extiéndele esta misma invitación. Ah, y recuerda que para firmar debes colocar el código {{Sultool|TU-NOMBRE-DE-USUARIO}}

Si deseas más información, puedes contactarnos:

Luis Manuel Madrigal en Wikinoticias, coordinador general de WM-CR.
Página de discusión en Meta-Wiki del futuro capítulo.
Canal #wikimedia-cr en IRC (servidor Freenode).
Notificaciones en Twitter.
Página de usuario en Facebook.

¡Te esperamos!

--

Allan J. Aguilar Castillo

mantis@tormail.net

Back !

¡Hola Murdock from Costarician Switzerland !

Happy to see you're back !

All the best !--Jebulon (talk) 15:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Jebulon. Gracias por el saludo :-)

De Zoeker

Congratulations on your featured picture: about half a mile behind it, in a boat on one of those little waterways, I got my first kiss. Great work--how did you take it? From a hot-air balloon? Drmies (talk) 02:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013!

		*** * * 2013 !!! * * ***
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Yours faithfully, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Primera reunión de Wikimedia Costa Rica

¡Hola, Murdockcrc!

En Wikimedia Costa Rica (WM-CR) estamos organizando una reunión qe involucre a los editores de los proyectos Wikimedia que residan en Costa Rica y a los miembros de este capítulo.

El objetivo de la reunión es organizar las pautas del capítulo para que WM-CR sea eventualmente aprobado por la Fundación Wikimedia. Aún no hemos asignado una fecha ni un lugar de reunión, pero tenemos previsto que se realice en abril en San José.

Si estás interesado y dispuesto a asistir, añade tu firma de usuario en la página de discusión del capítulo en Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. Además, si no te has inscrito a WM-CR, añade tu nombre de usuario en la lista de miembros.

Estamos conscientes de que pueden haber limitaciones espaciales o económicas. Si este es el caso, por favor comunícamelo por correo electrónico a <siglar@tormail.org> para asignarte un beca que incluya transporte, alimentación o estadía según sea necesario.

Finalmente, para facilitar las comunicaciones entre los editores costarricense (incluyendo trámites de becas y notificaciones), te pedimos que nos envíes voluntariamente un número telefónico para contactarte y tu dirección de correo electrónico personal a <siglar@tormail.org>. Toda la información que envíes será siempre confidencial y se utilizará exclusivamente para la organización interna de WM-CR.

Gracias por tu tiempo. Esperamos ansiosamente tu respuesta.

— mantis [religiosa] — 19:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

siglar@tormail.org ^{4096R/BE3B1B2C}

siglar@jabber.ccc.de ^{7DE09C02 8FF24CA1 CD1523F7 1CB197FE 7EAEF27C}

Freenode: #wikimedia-cr_entrar ^{siglar f7c195ac5410bdcc220f167e93b2dd7b211d5e80}

Hola Luis Me interesaría contactar contigo para conseguir una foto tuya en mayor resolución concretamente la "Orient Express Buch". Te agradecería me contactases a este email: xavi@hippy-heart.com. Gracias Xavi

File:M-budget logo.gif

File:M-budget logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jarekt (talk) 03:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 !

	*** * * 2014! * * ***
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Murdockcrc

Image:Ambulancia01.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Ambulancia01.jpg

Image:Network-templates_large.gif

Image:Enrico Ferri.jpg

Image:Tom_Clancy_-_The_Cardinal_of_the_Kremlin_cover.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Just have a look

Quality Image Promotion

scope change

Valued Image Promotion

FP Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

File:Nazare 001.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Hi

?

Luis debe quedarse!

Kept all

Checkuser result

1 600 × 1 200 = 1 920 000

Barnstar

hum hum in QIC

Murgjo Sharr Mountain Dog Nedi Limani

About this picture

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

* * * :) * * *

FP Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Tip: Categorizing images

Techtalk

FPC

Over-categorization

Great image

Valued Image Promotion

Windmills in Zaanse Schans

FP Promotion

De Zoeker

Elisabethkirche Schneeberg

Wikimedia Costa Rica

Back !

De Zoeker

2013!

Primera reunión de Wikimedia Costa Rica

File:M-budget logo.gif

2014 !

Navigation menu

Search