User talk:Molgreen/Archive 1

Archiv (20160820)

Welcome-body 16:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Molgreen!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 16:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Molgreen!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Martin-unfried-hkw-berlin-20110820-3x4-1284.jpg was uncategorized on 24 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:20060624 m xl wiki 0699.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorie

Hallo Molgreen, für deine Strommasten gibt es die Uberkategorie Category:Pylons in Germany - so wäre Category:Pylons in Brandenburg besser. --gruß K@rl (talk) 05:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Karl Gruber, herzlichen Dank für den Hinweis. Mir geht es darum, dass die Kategorie unterhalb von Category:Power lines in Germany entsteht. Viele Grüße Molgreen --Molgreen (talk) 04:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Ich habe diesen Beitrag so geändert, dass die Diskussionsseite nicht mehr in der Kategorie auftaucht. --Marc-André Aßbrock (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder

Hallo Molgreen,

ich habe gerade deine Bilder kategorisiert und bin dabei über einige wirklich schöne Bilder gestoßen. Deswegen will ich mich nun herzlich bei Dir für die tollen Windenergiebilder bedanken! Mach weiter so, solche Bilder können wir hier wirlich gebrauchen! Du kommst nicht zufällig demnächst in Janneby vorbei? Von den dortigen Nordex-Anlagen (neue Baureihe) fehlen uns nämlich bisher noch welche... Naja, wie dem auch sei, wirklich gute Arbeit! Allerdings, wenn ich mir zum Abschluss doch noch eine kleine Kritik erlauben darf, die Bilder ließen sich einfacher kategorisieren, wenn im Titel der Inhalt erkennbar wäre. Ein "Windrad" wär z.B. ganz praktisch. Ist aber nur ein kleiner Schönheitsfehler, da sie ja über die Windenergie-Kategorie auffindbar sind. Viele Grüße, Andol (talk) 15:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Windkraftanlagen / FOP

Moin! Ich habe die SLA entfernt und {{FoP-Germany}} eingesetzt. Solltest Du trotzdem eine Löschung wünschen, einfach eine Nachricht auf meine Diskussionsseite werfen. LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, danke für Deine Mühe.

Es handelt sich um ein Schiff/Boot (nicht(!) "bleibend an öffentlichen Wegen, Straßen oder Plätzen befinden"). Deshalb bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob "FoP-Germany" greift: "Dieses Bild einer geschützten Arbeit fällt unter den Artikel § 59 des deutschen Urheberrechtsgesetzes, nach dem es „zulässig ist, Werke, die sich bleibend an öffentlichen Wegen, Straßen oder Plätzen befinden, mit Mitteln der Malerei oder Graphik, durch Lichtbild oder durch Film zu vervielfältigen, zu verbreiten und öffentlich wiederzugeben. Bei Bauwerken erstrecken sich diese Befugnisse nur auf die äußere Ansicht.“"

Deshalb habe ich eine Löschdiskussion eröffnet. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das Design der Windkraftanlagen erreicht keine Schoepfunngshoehe, weder in D-Land noch in den USA. Das passt schon. :-) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, danke für Deine Mühe. Dementsprechend habe ich den Löschantrag zurück gezogen. --Molgreen (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:20150405 xl 3984-Ohne Titel--Gabi Ihde--2015.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:20150405 xl 3984-Ohne Titel--Gabi Ihde--2015.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martina talk 01:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Martina, ich habe eine Mail an das OTRS-Team gesendet: OTRS-Ticket: [Ticket#2015083110017748] Eingangsbestätigung (Re: Genehmigung des Urhe [...]) --Molgreen (talk) 16:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aloha! Du hast emailm, Kopie an Gabi Ihde! Wir brauchen die email direkt vom Urheber (wie immer)

LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, vielen Dank für Deine Mühe. Frau Ihde hat heute früh gleich an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org geantwortet. LG --Molgreen (talk) 17:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done! ♫Fuer Gabi tu ich alles...♫ Wir werden immer besser!

LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, prima, das ging ja echt super! Vielen Dank. LG --Molgreen (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaujaujau....., fix erledigt. Macht kaum arbeit, das schwierigste is das Einloggen ins OTRS-System.

Kommen noch mehr? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, ja, das Einloggen . . . ist immer lästig und dazu die unzähligen Accounts die man so hat. Und wo Du mich so direkt fragst: ich habe vor, die Initiatoren von "The House of One - c/o Bet- und Lehrhaus Petriplatz Berlin e. V." (http://house-of-one.org/de) anzusprechen, ob sie bereit wären, das Logo frei zu stellen, so dass ich es in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_One einbinden kann. Aber das will gut vorbereitet und gut getimt sein. Mal sehen, wann ich dazu komme. LG --Molgreen (talk) 08:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moin! Diese braunen Lego-Bloecke? Dafuer gibt es kein copyright, einfach hochladen und als Lizenz {{PD-Textlogo}} (wenn mit Text) oder {{PD-ineligible}} (wenn ohne Text). Fuer beide Moeglichkeiten bitte auch {{Trademark}} verwenden, einfach dahinter einsetzen. LG, --08:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Moin, zurück :-) prima! Danke für den Hinweis! Frage will ich den e.V. unabhängig davon. LG --Molgreen (talk) 08:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schaden kann das nicht. Uebegehen kann man die ja immer noch. Huestel....

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 10:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2015 House of One Berlin - Logo.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2015 House of One Berlin - Logo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle und Lizenz nachgetragen und ein paar kleine Aenderungen durchgefuehrt. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ju Ta & Hedwig in Washington, vielen Dank für Eure Bemühungen. --Molgreen (talk) 18:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Molgreen! Das Logo hat diese OTRS-Ticket Nr.: ticket:2015092910000437. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, herzlichen Dank für Deine Bemühungen in diesem Fall. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ju Ta & Hedwig in Washington, am Freitag habe ich mit Herr Timm telefoniert. Er fragte mich, in wie weit man die Nutzung einschränken könnte. Ich habe ihn gebeten, das per Mail mit Euch zu klären. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keine Einscharaenkung moeglich. Das Logo ist nicht urheberrechtlich geschuetzt, weil es zu einfach ist. Ich warte mal auf die email und werde Herrn Timm die Sachlage entspr. erklaeren. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, OK, prima, ich hoffe sehr, dass er sich meldet. Scheint viel um die Ohren zu haben. Danke & LG, --Molgreen (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:19880305 xl Kassenzettel der Handelsorganisation (HO 05 09 26 3822 - DDR) Modesalon Charmant 126 Strausberg Große Strasse 15 - Rueckseite.jpg

And also:

File:19880305 xl Kassenzettel der Handelsorganisation (HO 05 09 26 3822 - DDR) Modesalon Charmant 126 Strausberg Große Strasse 15 - Vorderseite.jpg

Yours sincerely, Krd 09:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres-1GB.webm

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres-1GB.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarekt:

It's the same video as: File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres.webm

Please compare the license information with: File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres.webm

I have sent two emails to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, I received no answer (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org):

16.02.2016 um 17:27 Uhr: "Fw: Bitte Video-Datei von Hermann Scheer "tauschen""

15.02.2016 um 17:35 Uhr: "Betreff: Bitte Video-Datei von Hermann Scheer "tauschen""

In German: Es ist dasselbe Video wie: File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres.webm

Bitte vergleiche die Lizenzinformationen mit: File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres.webm

Ich habe zwei E-Mails an das OTRS-Team gesendet. Leider erhielt ich keine Antwort (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org):

16.02.2016 um 17:27 Uhr: "Fw: Bitte Video-Datei von Hermann Scheer "tauschen""

15.02.2016 um 17:35 Uhr: "Betreff: Bitte Video-Datei von Hermann Scheer "tauschen""

many thanks --Molgreen (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Molgreen,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:20121230 xl wiki 1740.JPG

File:20121230 xl wiki 1740.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150724-154841-google-earth-link-dont-work.jpg

File:20150724-154841-google-earth-link-dont-work.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CoolCanuck ^eh? 23:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20151012 xl P1000454 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG

File:20151012 xl P1000454 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TOMMES-WIKI (talk) 08:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20151012 xl P1000443 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG

File:20151012 xl P1000443 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TOMMES-WIKI (talk) 08:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20151012 xl P1000438 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG

File:20151012 xl P1000438 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TOMMES-WIKI (talk) 08:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20151012 xl P1000420 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG

File:20151012 xl P1000420 Erfurt Landeshauptstadt von Thueringen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TOMMES-WIKI (talk) 08:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20160507 xl P1040016-Der Kein-Buch Lesende--Der nicht Buch lesende Junge--KULTURFREIE ZONE DESSAU-WMC.jpg

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, die Datei "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20160507_xl_P1040016-Der_Kein-Buch_Lesende--Der_nicht_Buch_lesende_Junge--KULTURFREIE_ZONE_DESSAU-WMC.jpg" wurde heute Nacht von "CommonsDelinker" gelöcht. ( [Ticket#2016052310021243] ) Kann ich irgend etwas tun, um die Bearbeitung des Tickets zu unterstützen? Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Habe mir ein par Wochen Wiki-Urlaub verschrieben, daher die spaete Antwort. Das Problem ist, Arlett Streich (als Kuenstler) muss die Freigabe senden. Der Urheber ist, zumindest nach Deutschem Recht, der einzige der das (c)right besitzt. Kannst Du das bitte anleiern? LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moin! Alles wieder gut! :-) Habe gerade das Ticket bearbeitet. LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archiv

Moin Armin! Hier ist mal ein schnelles Diskussionsseiten Archiv. In dieser Konfiguration wuerde der Bot automatisch alle Nachrichten die seit 60 Tagen nicht bearbeitet wurden in Dein Archiv verschieben. Eine Nachricht wird immer stehen bleiben, eine leere Seite sieht einfach doof aus. Einfach den ganzen Schmarn oben auf die Disku eintragen und fertig. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{user talk}} {{archive box|auto=yes}} {{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader = {{Talkarchive}} |maxarchivesize = 50K |counter = 1 |minthreadsleft = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |algo = old(60d) |archive = User talk:Molgreen/Archive %(counter)d }} {{clear}}

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, danke für Deine viele Mühe mit meinen Bilder. Ich melde mich die Tage. Bis bald. --Molgreen (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Molgreen!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

File:20131227-0931-ready-smiley-80x80-wikipedia-profilbild.jpg

Hello Molgreen, ich wollte mal kurz fragen warum du zwei Versionen davon benötigst und ob es dir etwas ausmacht dich von einer (wohl vorzugseise der geringen Auflösung) zu trennen? ↔ User: Perhelion 13:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Perhelion, kein Problem. Ich kann es auf meine to-do-Liste nehmen. Im Moment habe ich keine Zeit meine Benutzerzeiten anzupasssen. (Dafür habe ich wohl die geringere Auflösung erstellt. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Perhelion, danke für Deinen Vorschlag zum Aufräumen. (Damals kannte ich "...|x80px|..." noch nicht.) Die Datei wird nicht mehr verwendet und ich habe um "speedydelete" gebeten. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G Mester

Aloha! Ich habe fix mal fuer die Mester-Bilder eine sog. Creator Vorlage erstellt:

Gerhard Mester (1956–)

	Description	German caricaturist deutscher Karikaturist
	Date of birth	28 January 1956
	Location of birth	Betzdorf
	Work location	Wiesbaden
	Authority file	: Q1512151 VIAF: 246720574 ISNI: 0000000369312064 GND: 172541018 NKC: ola2015885741 NLK: KAC201622640

Bereits in die existierenden Dateien eingebaut. Kannst Du ggf. fuer neue Uploads im Autorenfeld verwenden. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig in Washington, sehr schön, danke, werde ich verwenden, wenn mal es wieder eine Karikatur von ihm hochzuladen gibt. VG --Molgreen (talk) 19:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:20170714 xl P1130497-taz-Die-Tageszeit-Richtfest--Schweiz-Aufrichte--in-der-Friedrichstrasse-20-22-TEIL-2.webm

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder/Orte

Hi, kannst Du bei Deinen Bildern in Category:Electricity pylons in Germany vielleicht noch den Ort oder wenigstens Bundesland in der Beschreibung ergänzen? --Te750iv (talk) 20:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Te750iv, ich werde mich bemühen . . . mit dem ersten habe ich begonnen:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20090808_l_xl_wiki_1952-Windkraftkonverter-neben-380-kV-Hochspannungsleitung-in-der-Naehe-von-Werder-Rehfelde-in-Brandenburg.jpg

Nicht bei allen werde ich so präzise Angaben machen können. Mittlerweile habe ich eine Kamera, die die Positionsdaten in den Bildmetadaten erfasst . . . Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Te750iv, mühsam ernährt sich das Eichhörnchen . . .

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20110911_xl_wiki_1432.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20110911_xl_wiki_1449.JPG

LG --Molgreen (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Te750iv, so, nun bin ich endlich dazu gekommen alle(?) Bilder zuzuordnen. Wenn Dir noch etwas auffällt, kannst Du mir gern Bescheid geben. Es könnte aber wieder etwas dauern . . . Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:20170815 xl 1144-taz-logo-2017.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe direkt ein OTRS-Verfahren eingeleitet:

An email has been received at VRTS concerning this file, and can be read here by users with a VRTS account. However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published. For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, or someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT agent, this file will be deleted. Please do not file an additional deletion nomination for permission reasons.

Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2018101310002402

--Molgreen (talk) 09:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Head-down_generation

Head-down generation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 11:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Themightyquill, would the German name "Generation Kopf unten" be an alternative? see: Generation Kopf unten --Molgreen (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Hi, Molgreen --> your userpage: Einzelnachweise das Layout, da stimmt doch was nicht, oder doch? Lotje (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, ja, ich weiß. Die Wikipedia-Vorlage fuktioniert hier leider nicht . . . Könntest Du mir sagen, wo ich eine Wikimedia-Referenzvorlage finden kann.

Danke für Deinen Hinweis. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 05:35, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich würde es mit User:Zhaofeng Li/reFill --> toollabs:refill versuchen --> https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/. Hoffe das klappt. Lotje (talk) 05:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, danke, https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/ hat einen Fehler gebracht - - ich habe es jetzt mal mit {{Cleanup-bare URLs}} versucht. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 04:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Molgreen: darf ich es mal versuchen? Lotje (talk) 05:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: , na klar, sehr gern! --Molgreen (talk) 05:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at my userpage discussion.

Does that look beter? Lotje (talk) 05:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: , Die erste Referenz gefällt mir sehr gut. Ich, hoffe, bis morgen dazu zu kommen. Herzlichen Dank. --Molgreen (talk) 05:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Molgreen: freue mich dass es geklappt hat. Lotje (talk) 05:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: , danke noch einmal. Hättest Du auch hierfür eine Idee?:

vielleicht so? <ref>Autor: [[w:de:Michail Gorbatschow|Michail Gorbatschow]], Titel: Kommt endlich zur Vernunft - Nie wieder Krieg!: Ein Appell von Michail Gorbatschow an die Welt, Verlag: Benevento Publishing, Jahr: 2017, Seite: 60</ref> --Molgreen (talk) 07:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:20190406 xl P1060753--bas-eickhout--martin-unfried--taz-lab-2019--was-steht-zur-wahl--en--de--teil-2-von-3.webm

Copyright status: File:20190406 xl P1060753--bas-eickhout--martin-unfried--taz-lab-2019--was-steht-zur-wahl--en--de--teil-2-von-3.webm

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:20190406 xl P1060753--bas-eickhout--martin-unfried--taz-lab-2019--was-steht-zur-wahl--en--de--teil-2-von-3.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Magog the Ogre, many thanks for your effort.

The file can be deleted.

There were problems with automatic conversion (processes broke off). That's why I manually converted and uploaded the file.

see: Bas_Eickhout_und_Martin_Unfried_auf_dem_taz_lab_2019:_Titel_der_Veranstaltung:_Was_steht_zur_Wahl

Many thanks for your effort. many Greetings --Molgreen (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Klimareporter.svg

Copyright status: File:Klimareporter.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Klimareporter.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)

Done Glasklar PD-Textlogo, keine Frage. Archivlink zur Quelle angelegt. Du kannst Dich wieder hinlegen! ;-) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages ^{(translate this)}
Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Please use SVG

Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:20141005 xl Innenraum-der-katholischen-Kirche-0182.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orca ten Broke (ship, 2017) (7).jpg

File:Orca ten Broke (ship, 2017) (7).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 16:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 163011-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 163011-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 163102-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 163102-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 16:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 163230-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 163230-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 17:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 163302-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 163302-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 172504-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 172504-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 172818 MP-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 172818 MP-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200528 xl 172942-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200528 xl 172942-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 17:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200603 xl 072012-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg

File:20200603 xl 072012-Solarschiff Orca ten Broke www.seminarschiff.com am Liegeplatz Focus-Teleport-Berlin in Berlin Alt-Moabit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20060624 m xl wiki 0699.jpg

File:20060624 m xl wiki 0699.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Solarschiff_Orca_ten_Broke_-_www.seminarschiff.com_-_am_Liegeplatz_Focus_Teleport_Berlin_in_Berlin_Alt-Moabit

Category:Solarschiff_Orca_ten_Broke_-_www.seminarschiff.com_-_am_Liegeplatz_Focus_Teleport_Berlin_in_Berlin_Alt-Moabit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Biberbaer (talk) 07:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Biberbaer, die Kategorien und Galerien habe ich umbenannt bzw. zum Löschen vorgeschlagen. Mit dem von Dir vorgeschlagenen Namen bin ich nicht so ganz glücklich. (Die meisten der von mir hochgeladenen Dateien haben eine langen und beschreibenden Namen. Deswegen habe ich jeweils folgenden Wunsch geäußert. Eine Web-Domain habe ich hier zum aller ersten Mal eingefügt und es sollte auch das letzte Mal gewesen sein: tut mir leid, wenn Du deswegen Aufwand hattest. --Molgreen (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Molgreen, Du hast in der Tat einen ziemlichen Aufwand verursacht. Ganz oben auf der Seite wurdest Du schon einmal gebeten Deinen Dateien einen vernünftigen Namen zu geben. Warum hast Du Dich nicht danach gerichtet? Bitte halte Dich in Zukunft daran, Du vermeidest damit unnötiges Nacharbeiten. Und keine Werbung, Webseiten usw. im Namen und der Beschreibung. Gruß -- Biberbaer (talk) 07:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Biberbaer, vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung. Für das nächste Mal würde ich mir sehr wünschen, dass Du mich vor einem Löschantrag kurz anschreibst. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Molgreen, ich würde mir wünschen es gibt kein nächstes Mal. Grüße -- Biberbaer (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Renewable Energy by Melanie Maecker-Tursun V1 4c.svg

File:Logo Renewable Energy by Melanie Maecker-Tursun V1 4c.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

The Banner (talk) 10:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:20060624 m xl wiki 0699.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

Done ich gebe mir zukünftig Mühe. --Molgreen (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:LED Street lights

LED Street lights has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Its Have Been Defunct, its may be deleted and you will be blocked from editing.

Done --Molgreen (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FFF-Bericht Ambition2035 Endbericht final 20201011-v.3.pdf

File:FFF-Bericht Ambition2035 Endbericht final 20201011-v.3.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Der enthaltene Text ist CC-BY-4.0, jedoch nicht das Werk selbst. siehe [1]

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : BlauerBaum.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FFF-Bericht Ambition2035 Endbericht final 20201011-v.3.pdf

File:FFF-Bericht Ambition2035 Endbericht final 20201011-v.3.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jordi (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwanenteich im Annatal 4.jpg

File:Schwanenteich im Annatal 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Molgreen (talk) 12:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abschnitt behalten

erledigt {{d}}
Ohne Zeitstempel keine Archivierung
busy: Pictogram busy.svg

to-do: Wind turbines with unidentified locations in Germany

Category:Wind turbines with unidentified locations in Germany

busy:

Category 29 sept global climate strike

ist aber doch 23 sept? C.Suthorn (talk) 18:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen C.Suthorn, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe verschoben und eine Schnelllöschung beantragt: Category:Global_Climate_Strike_in_Germany_on_29_September_2022 --Molgreen (talk) 04:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder vom Nuthepark

Tach, zu einigen Deiner schönen Bilder habe ich ein paar Fragen:

1. Ich habe File:20221119 xl 124000621-an-der-muendung-der-nuthe-in-die-havel.jpg absichtlich noch nicht umkategorisiert, weil man am rechten Rand teilweise den Brückenpfeiler sieht. Weil Du dasselbe Motiv in File:20221119 xl 123925349-an-der-muendung-der-nuthe-in-die-havel.jpg perfekt abgelichtet hast, stellt sich mir die Frage, ob die unperfekte Version nicht wieder (schnell-)gelöscht werden sollte. Wenn ja, wäre es am besten, wenn Du selbst in die Dateiseite ein {{SDG7}} eintragen würdest (Du kannst auch eine kurze Erläuterung einsetzen: {{SDG7|kurzer Text}}; wenn ich mich recht erinnere, wird dieser Text dann auf der gelöschten Seite angezeigt). Man kann aber sicher einen validen Behaltensgrund entsprechend zu COM:SCOPE finden, etwa als Beispiel für mögliche Fotografierfehler; ich weiß nur nicht, welche die entsprechende/-n Kategorie/-n ist/sind. Wir könnten dazu mal im Forum nachfragen. — Speravir – 01:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen Speravir, ich bin Deinem Vorschlag gefolgt. --Molgreen (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, was zu beweisen war: „wenn ich mich recht erinnere, wird dieser Text dann auf der gelöschten Seite angezeigt“. Túrelio, Du bist sooo gemein, jetzt stehe ich da auf Ewigkeiten drin. ;-) Geht nicht anders, oder? — Speravir – 22:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2. In Deinem ansonsten wirklich sehr schönen Bild File:20221119 xl 124150555-an-der-muendung-der-nuthe-in-die-havel.jpg empfinde ich die Krähe als zu prominent, daher störend. Hast du noch vielleicht ein zweites ähnliches Bild, dass Du nicht hochgeladen hast, das Du aber nutzen könntest, um den Bereich zu retuschieren und so die Krähe ~~abzuschießen~~ zu entfernen? Ohne das Geäst hätte ich es allein probiert. Den Graureiher können wir aber drin lassen. — Speravir – 01:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tut mir leid, es gibt leider kein zweites Bild. Mich persönlich hat die Krähe nicht gestört - ganz im Gegenteil. Aber in einer vergleichbaren Situation werde ich versuchen, daran zu denken ein zweites Mal abzudrücken. --Molgreen (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. — Speravir – 22:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für Deine Mühe. Da ich mich mit den Potsdamer Kategorien nicht so gut auskenne, stelle ich die Bilder immer ganz "oben" ein. Du schriebst glaube ich auch einmal, dass Dir dies so recht ist. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genau. — Speravir – 22:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wirf mal eine vorsichtigen Blick auf de:Nuthepark.

— Speravir – 18:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh, danke für die Einbindung und die Info hier. Freut mich. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lieferung

Du hast die Bilder vom Solaradweg in Freiburg gewünscht. Hier sind sie Category:SolarRadWeg (Freiburg) --Jörgens.Mi ^Talk 17:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen Jörgens.Mi, das ist ja sehr schön. Ganz herzlichen Dank für die schönen Bilder und Deine Mühe/die "Lieferung"! (Ich melde mich erst jetzt, da ich verhindert war.) Ich habe eins der Bilder hier und hier eingebunden. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 06:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Low-Quality Bilder

Nahmd @Molgreen (meine eigene Diskussionsseite hakt gerade, darum hier), ich messe den "low-quality!-Kategorien keine besondere Bedeutung zu. Einige Deiner Bilder, die dort gelandet sind, halte ich für alles andere als "low quality". Für viel wichtiger halte ich wissenschaftliche Kategorien, in denen die Vögel nach Spezies, Genus, Familie und Ordnung sortiert werden, was ich gerade für die Küstenvögel an der Ostsee unternehme. Gruß anro (talk) 01:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@anro, Danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Wäre es okay, wenn ich den Baustein {{low quality}} dort entferne und in der Zusammenfassung auf unsere Diskussion hier hinweise? Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hab das gerade gelesen, kannst du mir mal einen link dorthin geben. ich bin neugierig ob das überhaupt stimmt. Dokumentarische Bilder haben deutlich andere Anforderungen als Kunstwerke. --Jörgens.Mi ^Talk 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jörgens.Mi das ist der Link zu der Kategorie. Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 20:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Molgreen/Archive 1

Welcome-body 16:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Kategorie

Bilder

Windkraftanlagen / FOP

File tagging File:20150405 xl 3984-Ohne Titel--Gabi Ihde--2015.JPG

Copyright status: File:2015 House of One Berlin - Logo.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Copyright status: File:20100930 xl Hermann Scheer Neue Energie fuer linke Alternativen Keynote power to the people rls on green tour scheer-100930 lowres-1GB.webm

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

File:20160507 xl P1040016-Der Kein-Buch Lesende--Der nicht Buch lesende Junge--KULTURFREIE ZONE DESSAU-WMC.jpg

Archiv

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

G Mester

Image without license

Bilder/Orte

Image without license

Userpage

Copyright status: File:20190406 xl P1060753--bas-eickhout--martin-unfried--taz-lab-2019--was-steht-zur-wahl--en--de--teil-2-von-3.webm

Copyright status: File:Klimareporter.svg

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

Notification about possible deletion

Please give images better names

We need your feedback!

Abschnitt behalten

to-do: Wind turbines with unidentified locations in Germany

Category 29 sept global climate strike

Bilder vom Nuthepark

Lieferung

Low-Quality Bilder

Navigation menu

Search