User talk:McSush

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Darshan pal shanasara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darshanpal shanasara (talk • contribs) 19:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

if you want to talk ...

[edit]

de.wikipedia.org or

The SVG coding on that image is extremely clever, but it might be even better if it was transparent (without the opaque white background)... AnonMoos (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your praise! - I exchanged it against a transparent version. --McSush (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

svg images of signatures

[edit]

I, Tomasz W. Kozłowski, hereby award you, McSush, the Tireless Contributor Barnstar for your extremely hard work on vector versions of signatures. Thank you for your contributions & keep up the good work! odder (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Thanks for the code cleanup performed on my signature images. Connormah (talk) 00:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

graphic lab: signatures into svg

[edit]

I notice that you've been working on tracing signatures into SVG files. I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look at a recent Graphic Lab request that I just submitted: Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Pennsylvania political signatures. Thank you, --Blargh29 (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

well ... ok :) --McSush (talk) 01:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simplifying the two-reflector drawing to a single reflector is a fine improvement but I find it confusing to have the absorber tube outside and behind the reflector. I think we should go back to the old drawing until this is clarified. Jojalozzo (talk) 16:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i wondering no one else has seen this mistake before. it wasn't my intention to simplify the image. i just had forgotten the second row of reflectors. - but now: corrected. thank you, that you brought my attention to this. McSush (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

great arms of congress poland

[edit]

Thank you very much for solving my problem. I didn't realise that the Inkscape had such function. I use "copy" a lot, so "clone" will be very useful. Best regards Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

singapore flag

[edit]

http://mystory.sg/content/1564 and books published by the Singapore Government in 2001 stated that the Pantone color must be Pantone 032 for the red. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

( discussion continued at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Colour_corrections_for_Singaporean_symbols )
McSush (talk) 19:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seal of ohio

[edit]

I'd like to thank you very much for your work on an SVG of the Ohio Seal, I really appreciate it, danke! Fry1989 (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found a EPS file at http://www.seeklogo.com/state-of-ohio-logo-131908.html if that helps. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
@ Fry1989: always at your service! :)
@ Zscout370: this version you've found was made 1847 - my drawing rests upon the official version of 1996. but thanks for your effort. McSush (talk) 14:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the 1996 version, but just needs some color. I know the state also put their seal drawing online, but it is not a true vector file, so it will be hard to edit directly. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 17:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

coat of arms

[edit]

Hi McSush, can you move a little bit the star, is lightly descentered if you look the base it touchs the body of the axe, thanks for now. --Kineto007 (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you look carefully to the border of the 1st and 2nd flag of the left side you will notice that they have a straight edge, in comparison with the borders of the 1st and 2nd flags from the right that have a slightly "curved" edge instead of a straight one like it should be, can you fix it please? --Kineto007 (talk) 00:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The tips of the spears are not sharp enough, like in the original. And there are many more imperfections that should be corrected, like the lines in the axe body for example. Please do not change the color it's correct, and the suns too, thanks in advance. --Kineto007 (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kineto007 - i've tried a little bit - what do you think about it? McSush (talk) 03:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, It's pretty much better than the other version, although there are some imperfections that remained (the neck of the axe is rather shorter) and (the white knots touch the outer border of the axe), thanks in advance. --Kineto007 (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
do you know any better source instead this jpg image, e.g. a photo or something? it's difficult to recognise the details there. McSush (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry I don't have any better source than this poor JPG image, I've noticed that the length of the head of the axe is more shorter than t should be, could you fix it please? --Kineto007 (talk) 19:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not generally considered a good move here to re-upload a file which has been deleted twice before (see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AFlag+of+Lovely.svg ) unless you have some specific new relevant valid information with respect to copyright status etc. AnonMoos (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC) \[reply]

Hi AnonMoos - i've uploaded the flag, because at en.wikipedia is a request for vectorising a optical identic raster graphic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop/Top_4
I didn't knew, that others had uploaded such file before.
Is there any reason to delete my work, too? McSushtalk 19:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The flag design is copyrighted, unless otherwise stated by the people who run the Lovely Micronation. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ok, i don't have any legal base for this image.
but the file Flag of Lovely.png @ en.wikipedia should be deleted, too. then no one gets the idea, again, a vectorized version of it to upload here. McSushtalk 20:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just need to change the license since en.wp does accept fair use. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me for butting in, but can a design that simple be even copyrighted? Connormah (talk | contribs) 02:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It has some creative elements and can be copyrighted in the USA. However, you are allowed to ask the people who run this fictional state to release the flag image under a free license and can keep it here. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Seal of Ohio.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal_of_Ohio.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Multichill (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Code cleanup

[edit]

Please, can you cleans up the code of File:François Hollande signature.svg if necessary? Thank's a lot, --Domaina (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 18:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vernon Barford Signature.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JuTa 17:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevin Taft Signature.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rawlangs (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eschweiler flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Juergenk59 (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donald_Trump_Signature.svg file

[edit]

Donald_Trump_Signature.svg file height = 126 pixels.
Hillary_Rodham_Clinton_Signature.svg file height = 84 pixels.
Should a male author's signature be rendered as 50% taller than the analogous female author's?
Or, should the Donald_Trump_Signature file dimensions be resized to 67%? --Dervorguilla (talk) 06:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picasa Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

52.37.249.165 16:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis Braille Signature.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SteveStrummer (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dalida - signature.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

Hey! I am wondering if you could help me trace a signature 2803:9800:9096:7BF4:E0D5:F23F:E134:711E 23:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consultation

[edit]

Hello, McSush! I've had the chance to see some of your work, and I'm wondering if you could give me a hand on this one. I've traced it myself using Inkscape but I feel it didn't come up very well; I am not very good with the computer. Thank you in advance, have a good night. 7szz (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 18:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lady Jane Grey Signature.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lady Jane Grey Signature.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]