User talk:Letartean/Archive

Bienvenue dans les archives de ma page de discussion.

QI candidate

Bonjour Letartean!
Result is not OK, sorry. Try to correct tilt from original photo.
Use Filter/ Distort /Lens correction for angle and perspective both.
Or try Ruler (other tool in Eyedropper button at left).
The line from cross downwards is good visible and should be vertical.
Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Pointe au Pic2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment tilt CW, correction need. Nice colors --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC) Done I corrected it the best I can. Hope it's good enough.--Letartean 13:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC) QI to me --Dein Freund der Baum 12:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un ruisseau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, although partially bit dark. --kallerna 12:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone blanda purple white 2010-04-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. In the description of the file, please add the locality where the image was taken. --Cayambe 14:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)  Done--Letartean 20:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

canard

Désolé pour mon Anglais parfois déplorable. En plus des qualités techniques de ta photo, je trouve que ton canard a une belle silhouette de canard, et que son profil est parfait, c'est vraiment une belle forme de canard, telle qu'on se l'imagine. Il est représentatif, quoi ! Si je disais à mon fils de dessiner un canard, je l'enverrais vers l'image du tien comme modèle. J'ai du faire une erreur avec le sens du mot "outline", mais y'a pas à dire, j'aime ton canard, c'est comme ça ! Amitiés parisiennes--Jebulon (talk) 09:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallard duck 03-05-2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info For me it's underexposed but perharps it could be correct --Croucrou 19:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC) Better?--Letartean 20:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC). Good for me. Useful for a description of outlines. QI IMO.--Jebulon 22:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Thanks for your support, but could you explain:"Useful for a description of outlines." Do it in french on my talkpage ;) --Letartean 19:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

canard (suite)

et d'ailleurs, puisqu'on en parle, le voici promu ! ;)
Merci de ta réponse, je vois que nous nous sommes compris. Moi, je participe aux images de qualité pour proposer aux autres une partie de ma vision du monde, et pour recevoir d'eux celle qu'ils veulent bien m'offrir. Comme tu peux le voir, je n'ai pas de domaine de prédilection, ni de spécialité. Tout m'intéresse et tout m'amuse, je me sens curieux, et j'adore ce que je découvre. Même et aussi ton magnifique canard. Il m'apporte "quelque chose".--Jebulon (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Jay 2010-05-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one. — Jagro 21:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamalbaie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Lancer

Salut.
Comme tout "maudit Français", je ne comprends rien au base-ball (enfin, j'y comprends un peu plus qu'à votre "football" où là, c'est sûr, je ne comprends rien). mais je voudrais savoir si on écrit en Anglais "piching" comme tu l'écris dans ta description, ou "pitching" ? Et puis "motion de lancer", c'est du Français du Québec? Car ça ne se comprend pas en France. Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire ? C'est une décomposition du mouvement du lanceur ? Bon, je vais promouvoir tes photos, je trouve ça très réussi !--Jebulon (talk) 21:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Tu vas peut-être me trouver agaçant, mais je crains qu' "indépendant" ne doive s'écrire "independent" en Anglais !! Merci en tous cas d'avoir modifié la légende. Je trouve cette série très sympa, tu devrais la proposer pour une VICS. c'est vraiment de très bonne qualité technique, et on comprend parfaitement le mouvement, ça me plaît beaucoup. Je suis ravi d'avoir pris un peu de temps pour détailler ton image, j'y ai pris du plaisir !
Enfin quelque chose de nouveau, et dans le sujet, et dans le traitement, merci !
Pour ce qui concerne la lecture, moi j'ai compris immédiatement l'ordre à suivre, mais c'est vrai que le mouvement gauche-droite, puis haut-bas nous est familier, à nous autres occidentaux. je ne sais si un arabisant, un hébraïsant, un sinisant ou un japonisant aurait le même réflexe...
Mon humble conseil, c'est de laisser les choses en l'état, car une numérotation chargerait les images et ce serait dommage... Si quelqu'un te le demande, il sera toujours temps...
Je viens de téléverser rien que pour toi ce petit cadeau, c'est une vue de ma ville natale, pendant la fin de semaine de l'Ascension (vu le sujet principal de l'image, c'est amusant que ça se soit passé à l'Ascension)... Il y a sur cette image un détail que j'ai annoté à ton intention, tu peux naturellement supprimer l'annotation après découverte  !!
Bien amicalement à toi, de Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitching motion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and descriptive.--Jebulon 21:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drapeau du Quebec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK Lycaon 15:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château frontenac 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems fine. --Jovianeye 04:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cycliste au Tour de Beauce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 15:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Oklahoma City tornado 1999-05-03.jpg

J'ai importé cette image il a fort longtemps. Comme tu peux voir il n'y avait pas à l'époque de gabarit standard pour mettre les informations et je me suis mis comme auteur car je pensais que l'on demandait l'auteur du téléchargement. Je corrige tout de suite la page. Merci d'avoir attiré mon attention. Pierre cb (talk) 23:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lomer-Gouin-Traversier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau frontenac 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow!! --Carschten 20:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC) a bit tilted ?--Jebulon 10:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)  CommentI looked at all straight lines with a ruler in photoshop and they all seem straight to me... Letartean 15:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardeau2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments clean craft --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa Blanda 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Levels a bit off maybe due to the weather, but not terrible. --IdLoveOne 00:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rana septentrionalis 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Big air

Bonjour Letartean (Antoine ?).
Merci de ton message.
Tu me flattes, parce que personne ne doute que tu es un meilleur photographe que moi ! (surtout moi !)
Oui, je pense qu'il faudrait supprimer ce "truc" pas très beau dont on ne comprend pas ce que c'est.
Centrage ? Là, c'est une question de goût à mon avis.
Merci pour tes photos en tous cas, elles sont toujours magnifiques. Tu n'en publies pas assez !
Amicales pensées depuis Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Salut.

Merci de ton nouveau message.

Ton "big Air" semble bien parti en FPC, celui qui t'a donné cette idée a eu raison .

J'ai une vision plutôt "wikipédia" des photos: j'essaie de publier ce qui peut être "encyclopédique" et utile.

C'est vaste, mais si tu regardes ce que je présente (pas forcément en CIQ), tu auras une idée de ce que je veux dire.

Il y a des sites pour publier de "belles" photos artistiques, "Commons" est un peu autre chose, un peu "plus", dirais-je.

Cette opinion me vaut de m'accrocher parfois avec certains...

Bonne après-midi (ici c'est déjà le soir)--Jebulon (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Re

en français de France, on dit "je crois que tu tiens le bon bout" quand un succès se dessine. On dit ça, au Québec ? ;)--Jebulon (talk) 11:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Re

Oui, je vais obtenir ma vingtième...Mais je n'irai pas au "club" des "meet our photographers", parce que je pense que mes photos récompensées valent largement moins que celles qui ornent les galeries des collègues. Il y a un océan entre ce que certains réussissent et ce que je fais, à mon avis. Non, je ne crois pas mériter cet honneur.

Il faut aussi relativiser les statistiques: il y a sûrement de "potentielles" FP parmi tous les fichiers de "Commons", qui n'ont simplement pas été proposées, soit par ignorance, soit par désintérêt.

Mais je suis vraiment bien content pour toi, d'autant que c'est désormais plus difficile puisqu'il faut 7 votes "pour". Tu en as 8 pour l'instant, et aucune opposition (tu pourrais désormais en "subir" quatre sans dommage), c'est un très joli score ! Encore bravo, j'espère que tu nous en proposera d'autres.

Même si parfois le climat est tendu ou rude en page des FPC (les gens sont très sûrs d'eux, quelquefois péremptoires ou méprisants, et pas toujours très aimables...)

Oui, décidément, tu tiens le bon bout ! (ça doit être une expression de marine, un "bout" (prononcer boutt) étant en France un cordage de navire, le mot "corde" étant interdit sur les bateaux, par superstition). Tu peux légitimement être fier de toi.--Jebulon (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

FE-LI-CI-TA-TIONS !!!!!!!--Jebulon (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big air Québec 2011(3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Captured cleanly. --Avenue 08:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big air Québec 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments for me it's too sharp this motive --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Well, I'll take that... I guess I wont get a picture almost declined here because it is too sharp very often! I guess it coudl be panning shot to but I wanted to show the urban environnement of the scene which is rare in a snowboard competition. Please someonelse give a review. Letartean 15:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Wow ! Possible FP IMO, even if I miss the snow... Maybe a little crop left ? --Jebulon 17:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Done, still ok? Letartean 17:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Yes, even better. --Avenue 19:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rana septentrionalis 2010 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the crop seems too remote. --Avenue 20:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC) Better? Letartean 15:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Yes, and better than I would have managed. Very nice. --Avenue 19:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Régis Labeaume 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK IMO.--Ankara 09:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

QI candidates

Ok. Thank you--213.60.77.80 20:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Big air Québec 2011.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big air Québec 2011.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

FE-LI-CI-TA-TIONS !!!--Jebulon (talk) 01:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crashed Ice Québec 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 20:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Letartean. You have new messages at Jovianeye's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Régis Labeaume 2011(2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 08:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipa sp 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good choice of aperture. --King of Hearts 06:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carduelis tristis male 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:53, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

« Panorama »

Merci pour vos explications, Letartean. Malgré tout, et fondamentalement, cela me pose problème : les géants appartiennent au patrimoine immatériel de l’humanité (voir [1]) ; on est donc dans la situation où Commons et les autres sites ne peuvent légalement montrer le patrimoine immatériel de l’humanité ?! J’ai beau tourner et retourner ça dans ma petite tête, je ne pige pas. Je me suis aussi, suite à la conversation au bistro de Commons, offert une recherche sur le mot panorama dans Légifer ([2] : aucun article de loi trouvé... Le moins qu’on puisse dire, c’est que cela parait abscons ! Amicalement, --Égoïté (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Personnellement, je ne comprends pas le ton de vos messages sur ce sujet. Mon objectif est d'expliquer comment et pourquoi certaines images peuvent être publiées sur Commons. Je ne vois pas où est le problème d'informer les contributeurs sur les limites de l'application du droit d'auteur. Yann (talk) 09:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black duck headshot 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure about the composition (we can see a part of the back of the duck), however it looks like a QI for me. PierreSelim 00:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black duck headshot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me (same remark for the composition). PierreSelim 00:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

VI

Bienvenu en VI.

• Tu n'as pas besoin de citer des projets externes, en général on se borne aux Wikis. Personnellement je ne remplis jamais cette ligne que je trouve obsolète, il suffit de lire le fichier qui accompagne la photo pour savoir où elle est utilisé.
• Le scope est très important dans VI il doit être aussi concis que précis. Dans ton cas il ne faut garder que le nom "Régis Labeaume" et c'est tout. Si tu veux dire qui est ce personnage alors rajoute un commentaire c'est prévu, mais, pas dans le scope.
• J'ai toujours été surpris de l'accueil chaleureux que j'ai reçu dans ton pays, a ce titre je t'en suis redevable, n'hésite pas à me solliciter si je peux d'aider. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Anémone

• VA est un peu difficile au début pour comprendre les critères du choix.

Le scope doit donner le nom latin en italique suivi entre parenthèse du nom vernaculaire en anglais s’il existe ici : Anemone blanda (Grecian Windflower). Si le scope reste ouvert comme tu l’as mis la meilleure image pourrait être Anemone.blanda.7115.jpg car elle montre la fleur, les feuilles et l’habitus. Ton scope doit être restreint à « Fleur » : Anemone blanda (Grecian Windflower) – Flower.

Mais il y a beaucoup d’images dans cette catégorie. Il serait utile que tu dises pourquoi tu trouve cette image utile. La polychromie de l’espèce par exemple.

Il serait utile que tu mettes ton image dans la gallerie d’Anemone blanda, si ta photo est promue un Bot placera en dessous le sigle VA.

Tant que je te tiens deux autres remarques : sur 5 fleurs il en a seulement 2 bien cadrées je n’aurais pas voté favorablement pour QI, mais je n’y vais pas souvent. Tu n’as pas besoin de rappeler sur tes photos la nécessité de placer ton nom à côté de la photo s’est une nécessité incluse dans la licence et, par expérience, çà ce passe très bien. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Régis Labeaume.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This is my first try at VI, so please feel free to explain to me if I did something wrong on my talk page Letartean (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:26, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland bec cerclé 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Chess plumage a bit overexposed but QI to me after all. --Cayambe 15:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand prix cycliste de Québec 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand prix cycliste de Québec 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand prix cycliste de Québec 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand prix cycliste de Québec 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Adminship

Bonjour, Letartean! I am sorry that your request for adminship was not successful. However, the good news is that everyone seemed impressed by your work, and the sole concern was the number of edits you have at the Commons, especially in the Commons namespace. If you can get those numbers up in the next few months, I would be happy to support a subsequent request for adminship (or even nominate you if you would like). À la prochaine, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Abuse-filter

Bonjour, une personne a essayé de modifier User:Letartean. Si cété vous, vous devez vous connecter s.v.p. Merci. -- RE rillke questions? 09:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

John Money photos

I'm sorry, I wrote that I wasn't sure when I uploaded. Do you know what happened with the other file? I cannot find it. Thanks --Jalu (talk) 15:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau Frontenac 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add image description in english too. --Iifar 19:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)  Done. Letartean 20:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Sky is a bit too dull, but image is nevertheless QI to me. --Iifar 21:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Pikachu.GIF

What was the problrm with Pikachu.GIF?

AdmiralHood (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

You mean, every picture of pikachu is copirighted, even if you draw it yourself? AdmiralHood (talk) 10:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Test

Letartean

Fait le ménage ouf!

J'ai enfin crée Category:Images by Fralambert. À quelques 280 images, c'est long... --Fralambert (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Modèle de langue

Salut Letartean,

je ne sais pas si tu connais le modèle {{LangSwitch}}, mais tu peux l'utiliser sur ta page pour simplifier le rendu :

{{LangSwitch
 | fr = Bonjour et bienvenue sur ma page d'utilisateur.
 | en = Welcome on my Commons user page.
}}

Les utilisateurs francophones qui visitent ta page verront le texte français, et toutes les autres langues verront le texte anglais. Antaya (talk) 11:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Frontière Québec-Terre-Neuve

Bonjour Sémhur, Comme tu avais réalisé la carte sur le Canada, je me permet de faire de nouveau appel à toi pour une nouvelle demande. Pour l'article fr:Frontière entre le Québec et Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, j'aimerais avoir une carte semblable à celle-ci mais centrée sur le Québec et Terre-Neuve (en coupant le reste du Canada) avec cette fois-ci le Québec en bleu et Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador en rouge et la partie contestée qui était en rouge pâle serait en ligné rouge et bleu (pour indiqué qu'elle est revendiquée par les deux territoires). Merci d'avance pour ton aide, Letartean (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Letartean,

 Done : File:Disputed territory between Quebec and Labrador map-blank.svg

Mais pour ce genre de demande, je préfères que tu passes par l'atelier cartographique plutôt que de me demander en direct.

Sémhur (talk) 19:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Fichier SB petite.jpg

Salut Letartean, Je vois que la photo de Stéphan Bureau de contact tv a été téléversée par le compte User:Mcdupont, qui réfère au nom de la directrice et rédactrice en chef de contact tv. Il n'est pas impossible que celle-ci ait validement la possibilité de disposer des droits sur cette photo. Dans ce cas-ci, j'aurais tendance à présumer la bonne foi. Certes, si quelqu'un est motivé pour communiquer avec elle, il serait bon et peut-être nécessaire d'avoir une confirmation OTRS de sa part à l'effet qu'elle dispose des droits suffisants et que le compte sur Commons lui est bien associé. Mais une suppression immédiate est peut-être un peu rapide. C'est pas la meilleure photo du monde, mais c'est la seule qu'on ait actuellement. Qu'en penses-tu ? -- Asclepias (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Je suis d'accord avec ce que tu dis dans ta réponse. En effet, si la communication ne permet pas de constater toutes les conditions nécessaires à la validité du téléversement, il faudra supprimer. En l'absence de réponse après un délai raisonnable, il y aurait probablement lieu à un bandeau «No permission since». En ce qui concerne «c'est la seule qu'on ait», dans son contexte ci-dessus, ce que je veux dire, c'est seulement que dans un cas où il existe des raisons de penser qu'il est plutôt probable qu'une image soit légitime, et qu'il existe des moyens de le vérifier mais que ça peut prendre du temps, et que par ailleurs c'est la seule qu'on ait, alors lorsque ces conditions sont réunies j'hésite à dire qu'il y aurait urgence de la supprimer. Évidemment, ça ne s'applique aucunement aux cas où il n'est pas probable que l'image soit légitime. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pissaro Vue de la cotonnière d'Oissel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Did we lose some of the original in the crop? --Saffron Blaze 20:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Yes, I had to cut a little around because it is a crop from a picture taken in the museum with the frame. The frame and ligthing of the room caused shadows that I had to cut. Hope it's still good enough. Letartean 20:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)  Comment QI yes, but not FP. Saffron Blaze 21:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morrice-La veille maison Holton a Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 20:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacobi-Automne Canadien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oh Canada. --Saffron Blaze 18:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Modèle de WPQC

Salut Antoine, j'ai fait le template que tu m'as demandé, mais il n'est pas encore dans l'espace Template: pour que l'on puisse le tester, il est dans une de mes sous-pages. Dans un premier temps, comment voudrais-tu le nommer ? {{WPQC}} ? Aussi pour le logo, t'inquiète, je vais faire de quoi quand je serai chez nous, au bureau, je n'ai pas photoshop.

En tout cas, pour l'instant il est dans ma sous-page {{User:Benoit Rochon/Bac à sable}} et voici le paramétrage :

• Quelqu'un oublie de mettre son pseudo : {{WPQC}}
  

Erreur : le paramètre numéro est obligatoire incluant le numéro. Utiliser la sytaxe {{WPQC|numéro=008}}

• Un utilisateur met son pseudo : {{WPQC|numéro=06|pseudo=Letartean}}
  

Wikipédia prend Québec This image was imported on Commons as part of the event Wikipédia prend Québec (Wikipedia Takes Quebec city) by participant number 06, Letartean. All images from this participant are under a free license and are categorized in Wikipédia prend Québec - Participant 06.

• L'utilisateur est une fille : {{WPQC|numéro=03|pseudo=Anne-Sophie Ofrim|féminin=oui}}
  

Wikipédia prend Québec This image was imported on Commons as part of the event Wikipédia prend Québec (Wikipedia Takes Quebec city) by participant number 03, Anne-Sophie Ofrim. All images from this participant are under a free license and are categorized in Wikipédia prend Québec - Participant 03.

Si tu n'aimes pas le cadre, l'image, la phrase, les params ou n'importe quoi d'autre, fais-moi signe, je vais corriger tantôt. Au plaisir, Benoit Rochon (talk) 22:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Logo officiel appliqué. Benoit Rochon (talk) 03:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Opacité 50%... dis-moi si tu le veux plus foncé. Aussi, j'ai ajouté les params numéro= et pseudo=. Le numéro doit impérativement avoir 2 chiffres (ex.:04) pour une classification correcte. Benoit Rochon (talk) 23:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

La bannière est maintenant bilingue, basé sur les préférences de l'utilisateur :

Français

Anglais

Benoit Rochon (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamel-Fille de Jethro .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Québec-Drummondville-LHJMQ-2012-5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Just a suggestion: it is a sport image, but the goalkeeper isn't moving, so maybe you could have chosen ISO 400 and a bit longer exposure to reduce noise. IMO with 1/160 he wouldn't be fuzzy, and quality would be better. --Kadellar 14:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the advice! It was a first for me in this kind of environnement. I'll try to do it differently next time. Hope to hear feedback from you again! Letartean 15:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrystine Brouillet SILQ 2012-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 16:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunge Silos 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 22:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camion de pompier québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:35, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Corrections in English language

Hi Letartean, I just (hopefully) corrected some minors there: diff=70898540&oldid=70898029

If you disagree, revert, please. -- RE rillke questions? 09:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Administrator

---

Offert au nouvel administrateur par ses confrères…

Félicitations Letartean ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Snowbirds Quebec city 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian forces helicopter 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rescue exercise RCA 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good IMO.--ArildV 05:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Mohamadrezarezaei (talk · contribs)

It seems like a spam-only account. Block? -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 09:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipédia prend Québec

Bonjour Antoine,

J'ai bien reçu ton message, et je te remercie de la confiance dont tu m'honores en me demandant de participer, d'outre-Atlantique, au jury du second concours "port-folio" que vous organisez dans le cadre de votre prochaine initiative "Wikipédia prend Québec".

En passant, j'aurais plutôt appelé la manifestation "Wikimédia prend Québec" (puisqu'il s'agit de verser dans "Commons" et qu'on n'a pas d'obligation d'utiliser ensuite dans l'encyclopédie), plutôt que "Wikipédia", mais bon, tu connais le débat...

Bien entendu, j'accepte avec plaisir, et une grande fierté, de vous aider, dans la mesure de mes modestes moyens et capacités.

J'ai toutefois plusieurs réserves techniques, à toi de voir si elles sont compatibles avec votre organisation:

-1) Je ne suis pas familier de Skype, que je n'utilise pas (en plus, avec le décalage horaire...). mais je suis parfaitement joignable par wikimail, ou par mail perso que je vous communiquerai dès lors que nous serons tombés d'accord.

-2) Je serai en congés hors de France, et donc plus difficilement joignable sur le Réseau (iPad et connexion 3g seulement) du 20 juillet au 20 août, à peu près. ça, ça risque d'être problématique... A vous de voir si ça peut fonctionner quand même avec moi.

Une nouvelle fois, je te redis mes remerciements d'avoir pensé à moi pour vous assister, je ne suis pas sûr d'en être tout à fait digne, mais on verra bien !!

Quoi qu'il en soit, et même si, finalement, nous étions amenés à renoncer à collaborer, je t'adresse, à toi, aux autres organisateurs, et à tous les participants, tous mes vœux de succès pour cette manifestation, avec beaucoup de nouveaux arrivants, et beaucoup de belles photos dans "Commons", rien que pour me donner encore plus envie de venir vous voir, un de ces jours !...

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Bien reçu, ça me va, on fait comme ça. J'atends de tes nouvelles, d'ici là amusez-vous bien, ne cassez pas tous les policiers et attention à la Loi 78 ! ;)))--Jebulon (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rescue exercise RCA 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rescue exercise RCA 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Snowbirds Quebec city 2012-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian army bomber et fighters 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 18:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Snowbirds Quebec city 2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The blue's not especially vibrant, but ok. --Mattbuck 10:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompiers ste-anne-de-beaupré 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality.--ArildV 06:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompiers ste-anne-de-beaupré 2012 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality.--ArildV 06:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

WPQ : Bizarreries dans des EXIF

Salut Letartean,

En regardant rapidement quelques images de Wikipédia prend Québec, j'ai vu, dans les données EXIF des photos de deux participants, des mentions ambiguës ou contradictoires qui risquent éventuellement de causer des problèmes d'interprétation. Je suppose que les données des photos concernées peuvent être modifiées. Je ne sais pas comment le faire, mais si quelqu'un s'y connaît mieux, ce pourrait être bénéfique de faire les modifications à la source plutôt que de risquer que des utilisateurs soulèvent le problème dans le futur et mettent en doute les photos concernées.

• Dans les photos du participant 18, les données spécifient une notice de copyright «Tous droits réservés». Cette mention est généralement considérée contradictoire avec une licence libre et le principe de précaution implique qu'en présence de deux mentions qui pourraient s'interpréter de manière contradictoire, on considère que la mention la plus restrictive prévaut.
• Dans les photos du participant 36, les données spécifient un auteur différent du participant. À moins qu'il s'agisse d'un pseudonyme, il est possible qu'il s'agissait d'un prêt de boîtier. Quoiqu'il en soit, les mentions apparemment contradictoires de deux auteurs différents, lorsque les données EXIF ne concordent pas avec le bandeau d'information, donnent parfois lieu à des demandes de suppression, alors aussi bien éviter le problème si c'est possible en retirant la mention superflue.

Alors, voilà, c'était juste pour te signaler la chose, étant donné que tu es probablement la personne la mieux placée pour savoir ce qui peut être fait dans ces cas. Amicalement, -- Asclepias (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Big air Québec 2011

I would like to inform you about using your photo on my website. Your photo was placed on this website: Timing. Greetings.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pompiers ste-anne-de-beaupré 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pompiers ste-anne-de-beaupré 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

WPQ, où ça ?

Salut, pourrais-tu me dire où je peux trouver ce que je dois juger ? J'ai de la peine à trouver un lien, de ce côté-ci de l'Atlantique...--Jebulon (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Laisse tomber, j'ai trouvé...--Jebulon (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

J'allais oublier... Bonne fête nationale !--Jebulon (talk) 18:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fargo pickup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard au bassin Lairet - Parc Cartier-Brébeuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely clear quality picture.--Danesman1 17:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Félix Leclerc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice! Please correct small perspective distortion and add english decription. --Iifar 14:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Liberté de panorama en France

Bonjour, j'ai bien pris note de vos remarques sur mes photos. Mais en vertu de ce principe, faudrait-il alors proposer une autre de mes photos à la suppression, si je ne m'abuse ? :( Cordialement, --El Funcionario (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jean Charest 27 août 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 12:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Re

Hi, there's a huge OTRS template at the pics. It was sent yeasterday, but just now I am uploading the pics. If you are an OTRS volunteer, please see the mail box, if not, just wait until receive the ticket permission. Thank you. +PrinceWilly 17:50, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

It's okay, but you don't have to do that now. Wait until the OTRS confirm the permission. If it be allowed, then upload the pics again. There's no problem.+PrinceWilly 19:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Anonymat

Salut,

J'ai un étudiant qui désire garder l'anonymat pour sa photo de WLM. Malheureusement, j'ai pas fait attention au nom du fichier.

Peux-tu masquer les version précédente (avant le renommage) de l'historique pour qu'on ne voit pas son nom dans le fichier ? Si ce n'est pas possible, peux-tu supprimer l'image que je la réimporte ?

Merci ! - Simon Villeneuve 10:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Tout est ok. Merci ! - Simon Villeneuve 15:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aaron Palushaj - Hamilton Bulldogs - 2012-11-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The pic could be brighter, but good quality. It would be nice to keep EXIF data. --Jastrow 00:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC) I uploaded a lighter version. Still QI? Better? Letartean 17:46, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Better I think (and Canadiens FTW). --Jastrow 19:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Problème avec un contributeur

Bonjour,

je vous prie de bien vouloir jeter un coup d'oeil à cette conversation et aux remarques de Edelseider à qui je n'ai jamais rien demandé.

Voici son commentaire de diff que je considère comme une attaque personnelle => (diff | hist) User talk:Edelseider‎ ; 20:38 . . (-3 204)‎ (Cette discussion n'a rien à faire sur ma page, elle est très bien sur la page de Ctruongngoc. Vanité + aigreur = mélange pitoyable) .

Merci de lui demander d'éviter de ne plus s'occuper de mes images et de me laisser tranquille. Avec mes remerciements, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec Remparts - Cape Breton Screaming Eagles - QJMHL - 11-11-2012 (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec Remparts - Cape Breton Screaming Eagles - QJMHL - 11-11-2012 (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO QI --The Photographer 17:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamilton Bulldogs - Syracuse Crunch - Bell Centre - 09-11-12 (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Devon Kershaw Sprint Quebec 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Tuxyso 21:40, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec Sprint Cross-country Skiing World Cup 2012 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:09, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Salut, Je suis nouveau et carrément paumé : je viens de faire mon premier artricle Wiki, ou plutôt d'essayer de la faire ! J'ai donc bien travaillé un texte sur wordpad que j'ai copier-collé et ensuite prévisualisé et là : oh catastrophe mon Dieu ........... ! Mon texte est haché en plein de morceaux enfermés dans des cadres avec des onglets qu'il faut faire défiler interminablement pour lire le texte ! Pourrais-tu m'aider, s'il te plaît, car je n'y comprends vraiment rien, bon, c'est vrai, je ne suis pas très doué de nature mais quand même, lol ! Merci à toi ! EmpereurdeJade EmpereurdeJade (talk) 11:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowjamboree 2013 slopestyle (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment remove dust spot. See note --Rjcastillo 20:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Done, but the cache of the site seems broken. See 3rd version from top, it should be that way soon. Thanks for the heads-upLetartean 21:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SnowJamboree2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 00:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Quebec Sprint Cross-country Skiing World Cup 2012 (4) V2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quebec Sprint Cross-country Skiing World Cup 2012 (4) V2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odocoileus virginianus - Parc du Bic - 2013-05-29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Québec - Emile Abraham - 28-07-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 09:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Martre lighthouse - La Matre,QC,CA - 16-06-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 14:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Martre lighthouse - La Matre,QC,CA - 16-06-2013.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Martre lighthouse - La Matre,QC,CA - 16-06-2013.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletions and notifications

Hi Letartean, thank you for deleting this copyvio. However, it would also be kind if you could notify the uploading user on his talk page regarding such a deletion. It is important that they get a notification that we do not accept copyright violations at Commons. This makes it easier to block them in case of repeated offenses. I've notified this user now as I came across a vandalism by the same user and checked his deleted contributions. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 11:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump

Dear Letartean. You deleted the template {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2013|ca}} at this and [Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump827.jpg site]. It's not that big problem for me. I just want to know, why a UNESCO World Heritage Site is not a historical monument, not WLM.ca, as you wrote. Thx, Matthias Süßen (talk) 17:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Letartean, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Letartean, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team