User talk:Kalabaha1969

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kalabaha1969!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Kalabaha1969!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:ОШС 1415-го зрп.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.104.120.84 19:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 22:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


--  Gazebo (talk) 09:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 04:07, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Доброго времени суток. На карте ошибка - вместо Петропавловска на севере дублируется Павлодар. Не могли бы Вы исправить? --Sigwald (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Вот блиииииин.... И на старого чертёжника бывает проруха.... Обязательно исправлю. Мне уже написали что там не хватает куска ж/д между Хромтау и Никельтау. Это тоже надо включить. А про Петропавловск - вы первый кто заметил это. --Kalabaha1969 (talk) 11:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ЖД РК

[edit]

Ерлан, благодарю за работу! Хотелось бы как-нибудь с вами связаться, есть пара вопросов. Uvik (talk) 07:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ерлан, приветствую. Не могли бы вы поправить карту? 1. На ней указано, что ветка на Молодёжный (точнее на одноименный угольный разрез) начинается со станции Мырза. На деле ветка идет со станции Нура, что немного южнее, а обслуживает(-ло) её Нуринское погрузочно-транспортное управление (НПТУ)[1]. А с со станции Мырза есть ветка на рудник Нурказган. 2. Добавьте, пожалуйста, ветку на Жайрем со станции Жомарт[2]. 3. Ветка Шубарколь — Аркалык достроена[3]. Спасибо. --Юкке (talk) 04:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Принял во внимание. Как будет время - обязательно исправлю.
Насчёт достроенного - я думаю придётся исправлять название карты. Это уже не декабрь 2014-го. --Kalabaha1969 (talk) 05:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:79-а аеромобільна бригада.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PsichoPuzo (talk) 12:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Almaty: documentation of destruction

[edit]

Hello, Kalabaha1969, thank you very much for providing so many well selected fotos, showing many relevant aspects and places of the destruction in Almaty! And thank you very much as well for the precise descriptions, giving important details! And of course for finishing all this in such a short time. I would like to ask you one question in general: how this information has been generated? I mean, how has it been identified and qualified, what can be seen on the fotos (for such kind of information one can't check with his own eyes)? For example, how has it been identified, to which kind of security forces a specific burned car belongs. Thank you very much in advance. Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Извините - отвечу на русском. Я думаю вы воспользуетесь он-лайн переводчиком. Принадлежность автомобилей к конкретным силовым ведомствам выяснить очень легко - по государственным регистрационным номерам. У Пограничной службы КНБ РК серия номеров ШК, у полиции KP, у национальной гвардии UU. Тем более я точно знаю что UAZ Patriot и белые автобусы Daewoo BS-106 (модификация с одной пассажирской дверью) используются только в Национальной гвардии, а автобус ПАЗ-3205 и седан Hyundai Elantra с проблесковыми маячками в Алма-Ате используются только в полиции. Кстати на фото Elantra на крыше видно крепление для проблесковых маячков. На автомобиле КАМАЗ со спущенными колёсами - на двери видна эмблема Национальной гвардии Казахстана. В остальном - я лично проводил опрос силовиков и очевидцев событий.--Kalabaha1969 (talk) 11:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have to apologize for using English instead of Russian language. Thank you very much for your prompt and kind response (yes, by using an online translation it is intelligible for me). My question has been fully answered. Thank you very much again for your valuable and precise work here! Greetings from Germany. --Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki (talk) 23:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Викимедийцы Алма-Аты

[edit]

Доброго времени, коллега! Я тут взял на себя смелость немного организовать местное сообщество Викимедиа и потихоньку налаживаю контакты. Будем плюс-минус организованно работать над представлением города в Вики-проектах. Вы как, не хотите присоединиться? Красный wanna talk? 04:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник воинам-афганцам в Алма-Ате.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник Бауыржану Момыш-улы в Алма-Ате.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Шеврон военной полиции Казахстана.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]