Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minis as Red Bull campaign car

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Minis as Red Bull campaign car

The depicted vehicle or vehicles incorporate artistic elements that are likely copyrighted. (Some of the photos are from countries that have FOP for artwork; however, it seems unlikely that the artwork on the vehicles would be considered to be permanently installed in a fixed location.)

Gazebo (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: this is ridiculous. OSX (talk • contributions) 10:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. An interesting case; for now I oppose on technical grounds: images should be split by country and detailed FoP analysis presented for them. In either case, we are looking at a huge potential problem with the parent category Category:Advertising vehicles or even Category:Outdoor advertising, and this discussion should be focused on the big issue. I'll post a question to Commons talk:Freedom of panorama. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:42, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please refile on a case-by-case basis, separated by country. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Minis as Red Bull campaign car

Derivative work of artistic elements on the vehicles; FOP in the US does not extend to artwork.

Gazebo (talk) 09:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This affects images in every category up to Category:Red Bull itself. There is no reason why this is restricted to the artwork being used on cars. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It seems to be a common policy to accept such images per Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Is_FoP_covering_outdoor_advertising.3F. Also, the case discussed should be all images at Category:Outdoor advertising in the United States, with a correspondingly larger discussion. This tiny discussion should not be used as a sneaky precedent for an instance of meta:copyright paranoia. Please escalate it to all affected images, and notify all affected parties. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 13:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The logos therein may be copyrighted. However, the images themselves are user-created works. They are merely advertisements. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The images contain derivative work of copyright protected material. For countries having FOP I'd say the cars are permanently modified, they are not artwork themselves but they are modified the way they are to be permanently in public space for advertising, so covered by FOP. In this cases, though, the origin country is the US without having FOP for artwork, so I see no possibility to keep them. --Krd 17:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom/Krd. INeverCry 23:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minis as Red Bull campaign car

Files in Category:Minis as Red Bull campaign car

Files in Category:Minis as Red Bull campaign car

Navigation menu

Search