User talk:JuTa/Archive 30

My photo galleries

Hello Juta,

Thank you, not to change anything in these pages are personal. Best regards.--Wayne77 (talk) 11:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Heart

hello, I noticed that your Bot deleted a picture i added to my friends wiki page. it was a screen grab from her facebook page and i was given permission to use it. please revert or I will. thank you. --Sexualharrison (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) He means File:Heather.heart.facebookgrab.jpg. (Grabs the popcorn and sits back.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, firstly not only you, but everybody in the world has to be allowed to use it for any pupose. If the photogapher agrees to publish the imgage under such a license - like i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}, he/she has to send an email to the commons support team as documented at Commons:OTRS. If everything checks out OK they will undelete the image for you. regards. --JuTa 17:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Apologies - I misread your edit summary

JuTa - apologies for that, I misread your edit summary. I've struck my comments from the discussion pages concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

smile - thats OK :) --JuTa 16:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Hchc2009 (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	با سپاس از دقت شما Shams bahari (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Licence et File:Autocar Repellin et Traffort. Jaume. Lans. 1911.JPG

Bonjour JuTa,

à propos de File:Autocar Repellin et Traffort. Jaume. Lans. 1911.JPG, merci pour votre remarque. Effectivement la licence manquait. Celle qui est en place debrait convenir.

--6PO 15:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, a good, but not perfect try. You don't know if the unknown author lived past 1914 for this 1911 photo. I corrected that now - see here. regards. --JuTa 21:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Udeletion of File:MergeUconn09.jpg and a bunch of associated files

Hi, JuTa! We now have an OTRS ticket for these (Template:OTRS ticket). Looks like there are five or six together on the ticket. Can you undelete? Ping me with any questions. Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 09:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi KDS4444, I restored and renewed the problem tag for File:MergeUconn09.jpg now. Please add OTRS confimation asap. But could you please name the other files afftected by that ticket? Here a list of deleted files uploaded by the same user: File:Community at Asheville Art Museum an installation by Sharon Louden-SD.webm, File:SharonLouden ReflectingTips-Yahoo-2001.jpg, File:SharonLouden CarrierAnimationStill.jpg, File:SharonLouden Eventing2011.jpg and File:Blue-Willow.jpg. regards. --JuTa 18:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Image Copyright

Hello, you requested a copyright for this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CoE_Symbol.gif#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D

The author of this image, Chris Korda (Founder of Church of Euthanasia) has granted permission for anyone to use it.

"All material on the Church of Euthanasia web site is yours to use, in any way you like, with the following important exception: Rev. Chris Korda's music is copyrighted and owned by various record labels. You are permitted to download the MP3 files for your own personal use, but distributing Rev. Chris Korda's music in any other way, without permission from the appropriate record label, is a violation of applicable laws."

Could you please tell me how to edit the image information as so to make it right in the Wikipedia Commons parameters?

Thank you for your help.

Cffmariadaluz (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Edit:

I have edited the license to the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license, since the author says it is free to use, copy, etc. Is the information correct now? Can you take the tag?

Thank you again.

Cffmariadaluz (talk) 00:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I dont think its cc-by-sa because there is no word about it in your link, but I think its free. I now changed it to {{Attribution}} and {{Licensereview}} to get another pair of eyes to check. regards. --JuTa 07:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Cffmariadaluz (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Years

Please restore: 1940, 1941, 1943, 1948 and 1949 Thanks! Evrik (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 07:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

How about File:Changde battle 2.jpg from 1943? Fastily is gone. I think it can be rehabbed. Evrik (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

No, it was uploaded completely without a source, the deletion was IMHO correct. --JuTa 07:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Could it be from the same source as this: File:Changde battle.jpg? Evrik (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

No, that one isn't there. That one showed some running soldiers climbing over a fence with a ladder. regads. --JuTa 19:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

• 1912, please. Evrik (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done --JuTa 15:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• 1911 and 1913, please. Evrik (talk) 01:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done for 1911. 1913 was just a redirect to the category. Please recreate it with content. --JuTa 06:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

• 1906, 1907, and 1909, please. Evrik (talk) 15:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 17:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Gerd Müller & Dettmar Cramer.jpg

See source! Cc-by-sa? Where? --ManFromNord (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

No, but {{Nationaal Archief-license}} looks valid for me - see here. Anyhow, I converted it now into a regular DR. You might like to leave a comment there. regards. --JuTa 17:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

London Underground geographic maps/CSV

This is not a gallery page, it is the source data for the files on the parent page. By deleting it, you made it impossible for anyone to come along and improve the files. I will revert your deletion, unless you do so first. In future, please pay attention to the content, and do not do drive-by deletions without investigating first. James F. (talk) 23:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, it shouln't be in the gallery namespace, cause its no gallery. What would be the correct namespace for that? --JuTa 23:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

It's part of the documentation of the gallery. I've restored it. James F. (talk) 17:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Can you fix my template?

Can you fix my template? I am trying to make a translation for {{Convert to PNG}}, but while doing that, it looked like my template became broken. Can you try to fix it? Thanks! Pokéfan95 (talk) 07:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done by AFBorchert Pokéfan95 (talk) 07:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

503 Errors

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T113878

See Commons:Village_pump#Missing_Commons_image_text_pages. It would be better for you to drop me a note with a list of blank image text pages rather than editing them, as I can regenerate the texts but will skip those with information boxes added. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, I'm just checking Category:New uploads without a license. Some of the are yours some are of other people. I just go through alphabecticly and press the "no license" button where needed. So I guess you will get some more messages of mine. Feel free to merge or remove them and (of corse) try to fix the missing license (and source and author) informations. regards. --JuTa 10:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

This approach seems to waste your volunteer time and mine. I am running a SQL script to find affected files and will repair them as per User_talk:Fæ#Post_hoc. If you could be patient, these will be fixed en mass. In the meantime I have also raised a Phabricator task as the root cause is WMF server failures, not any action by volunteers. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, its not wasted time for me cause I have to (or wanna to) check all the files within Category:New uploads without a license. I could try to add the no license tag manually and dont inform you, which wasting a little bit more time for me an less for you. regards. --JuTa 11:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

I estimate that in about 3 minutes, the fixes will be complete, so there would be nothing for you to find. Can you wait that long? --Fæ (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

OK, I'll take a break for about 10 minutes :) --JuTa 11:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done though as this is an on-going problem, further blanks are going to keep on appearing. I can redo the same fix but I'd only want to run this about once a day (the failure rate being something like 1/200 uploaded files via the API). --Fæ (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Update Just seen you marked an image dating from 26th, I'll rerun my script for any through the last few days, though this will probably take longer to finalize. --Fæ (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Could you take another look at File:Sessional papers of the Dominion of Canada 1901 (1901) (14746613336).jpg and File:Letters from a surgeon of the Civil War; (1906) (14760394114).jpg? I think these are obviously public domain, so they are strange things to delete. I don't know why my SQL did not pick them up before, but it would be easy enough for me to create the text pages if I know they are blank. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, you have been notified about the missing license - see here and here. But anyhow: I undeleted them an renewed the problem tags. Please update the decriptions asap. Thx. --JuTa 00:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, as you might guess from the Phabricator task, it is unrealistic for me to keep track of these "manually" if there are up to 30 WMF server failures in a day, every day. So, if my SQL script fails to pick up an image then they would need to be flagged in some exceptional way for me to notice. I think these two were missed due to being overwritten with rotations, so they are not the original images. I revised my script to cater for this, though it may not be perfect. Feel free to chip in on Phabricator. Without some sort of WMF Ops investigation, this problem is unlikely to stop any time soon.

In general, I suspect most of the Commons community would expect administrators to be sufficiently aware of what they are deleting from commons to think twice before deleting drawings or photographs published in the U.S. more than 100 years ago, even if the image page text has failed to be created. --Fæ (talk) 00:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, but what do you think "normal" admins can do except notifying you about the missing licenses and deleting the images after +1 week if there is no change/reaction? --JuTa 00:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

PS:Without a description its absolutly not clear for an admin if the image is +100 years old and/or if it had been published in the U.S. --JuTa 00:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Fixing my bad name problem

Thank you very much for fixing my slippage!!! Canon55D (talk) 18:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

You are wellcome :) --JuTa 18:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Jaco 2.jpg

Hello! Wasn't this photo made by Natália Carrascalão Antunes? She gave a permission for her images. Compare to File:Beach ahead Jaco.jpg. Maybe this file just missed the tag. Greetings, --JPF (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, yes there was a OTRS pending since 1. of August, but without any reaction of OTRS stuff. After 3 months those images fall automaticly into Category:Media missing permission and about 1 week after they get deleted. The other image confirmed User:Willy Weazley , perhaps you ask him if it was just forgotten or if the was a reason not to proceed it. Or you ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for it. regards. --JuTa 16:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, I organized the permission. The email from Mrs. Carrascalão Antunes included all her images in her user category. Isn't the mail text stored in the OTRS system? --JPF (talk) 05:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't know, because I cannot read those mail, because I am not a member of the OTRS team. That's the reason you better ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard. regards. --JuTa 08:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I am dreaming of a world, where all, who can delete, can read OTRS. It is not your fault. Have a nice week. :-) --JPF (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Les Jeunes1904.jpg

Créé par la FGSPF, devenue FSCF au fil du temps, ce fichier a été scanné au siège de cette dernière par mes soins à partir d'un exemplaire archivé. Je pensais qu'un document datant alors de près 110 ans (111 aujourd'hui) relevait du domaine public. Ais-je fait une erreur ?--Claude PIARD (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Might be, but you are not the copyight owner of it. You cannot publish it under CC license. Please search under Commons:Copyright tags if you find a more suitable license template. And please declare it not as your own work. Who was the publisher at that time of the newspaper and how long did he lived? If he died before 1946 its likely {{PD-old-70}}. regards. --JuTa 08:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

The Making of Modern Michigan

This "gallery" that you deleted seems to have been serving as a source link in a number of files. See, for example, File:Aerial view of Kalamazoo Vegetable Parchment Plant, printed poster (c.1922).jpg. Is there a way to save/restore those links? Rmhermen (talk) 23:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I restored but moved it to Template:The Making of Modern Michigan, because it seems to be a template. I transcluded it in the file description pages as well - see here. regards. --JuTa 02:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Löschung von Category:Train stations in Herisau

Hallo JuTa, das ist aber schnell gegangen. Du hast die Kategorie gelöscht, mit der Begründung «incorrectly named» (wie müsste denn der korrekte Name sein?). Ich habe bewusst bei der Category:Herisau railway station kein Löschantrag gestellt, sondern sie nur zur Diskussion vorgeschlagen. Meiner Meinung nach wurde jetzt die falsche Kategorie gelöscht - denn es gibt nicht den Bahnhof in Herisau, sondern mehrere. Da ich mich nicht mehr in die Diskussion einschalten konnte, habe ich mich nun auf der Seite Category talk:Herisau railway station zum Problem geäussert. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 20:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Das war ein Schnelllöschantrag via {{Bad name}} von User:Achim55 dem ich stattgegeben habe. Gruß --JuTa 01:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Alles klar - wir sind jetzt dort am weiter diskutieren. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 23:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

B.

es reicht! Das hast du doch schon einmal veranstaltet!? Haben wir doch schon mal durchdiskutiert. Ich bin's müde. Ich werde meine gesamte B. Arbeit löschen, wenn du deine Löschung nicht zurücknimmst. --Gerhard Haubold (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, falls es um Bültzingslöwen zu Haynrode geht. Dessen gesamter Inhalt war (ich zitiere): =Bültzingslöwen zu Haynrode= Das Adelsgeschlecht der Bültzingslöwen residierte in den Jahren 1515 bis 1874 in drei Rittergütern im Eichsfelder Haynrode . Da fehlten leider jegliche Bilder, und konnte deshalb nach Commons:Galerien#Elemente einer Galerie (Punkt 2) schnellgelöscht werden. Gibt es denn Bilder, die dort hinein passen/gehören? Falls ja, bitte nenne sie mir hier. Dann stelle ich es gerne wieder her und füge ie Bilder hinzu. PS: Es war auch unkategorisiert. Wenn Du passende Kategorien nennen kannst wäre es toll. Gruß --JuTa 02:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Bitte entschuldige meinen gestrigen Ton. Die 14 Bilder, die dazugehören, finden sich unter:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Haubi#B.C3.BCltzingsl.C3.B6wen_zu_Haynrode die Kategorien: Kategorien (++): Rittergut Haynrode (−) (±) (↓) (↑)Bültzingslöwen zu Haynrode (−) (±) (↓) (↑)(+) Danke und Gruß --Gerhard Haubold ({File:1913 DSC-Jugend x Meißen.jpg{int:Talkpagelinktext}}) 09:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

OK,  Done. PS: Auf Deiner Benutzerseite sehe ich sehr alte Bilder als eigenes Werk deklariert, z.B. File:1913 DSC-Jugend x Meißen.jpg. Wenn Du das wirklich selbst geschossen haben solltest müsstest Du jetzt um die 120 Jahre alt sein. Bitte koregiere das doch. --JuTa 12:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Georg Obst

Hallo JuTa, ich habe hier geantwortet: User talk:Stefan4#Georg Obst. Viele Grüße, --Hemeier (talk) 20:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File talk:Mary Phagan.jpg

Hi JuTa. I have a query about the source link and licence for the Mary Phagan image. See File talk:Mary Phagan.jpg. SilkTork (talk) 08:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, if you have doubts if an image is freely licensed raise a regular deletion request for it, but dont just remove the license template and similar from the description page. regards --JuTa 08:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Actor_Brooks_Benedict.jpg

In reply to your message of: JuTa 07:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC) on my page

Dear JuTa: I appreciate your kind remarks regarding addition of this file. As far as information on its source, it was accurately stated in detail during file upload as well as in the Biography page for Mr. Benedict where it is linked to and where it appears. To reinstate, this particular print is: "Photograph of Actor Brooks Benedict". in University of Washington, Special Collections, J. Willis Sayre Photographs, Item No: JWS20598. Hollywood, CA, USA. 1931. I personally contacted the curator and a permission to use request was properly filed. Permission was granted officially on October 7, 2015 in writing for the purpose of appearing in Wikipedia. I can provide you with a copy of the letter or UW libraries can be directly contacted to verify. Please do not hesitate to write in case of further questions. Respectfully, M. Neshat Ph.D. 71.103.146.125 11:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mneshat (talk • contribs) 11:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I answered on your talk page. regards. --JuTa 17:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

img deletion

wotf ?! i need to put images in the articles ,how tf i cant put shared files on web images , im also not expert , rather, newbie in wiki text and other stuff , pls explain --Zafer14ur8 (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC) rub&sap

Hi Zafer14ur8, please read Commons:Licensing. Every image on commons needs to be reuseable for anybody in the world for any purpose. The fact that an image is visible on a webpage does not mean its not copyrighted. In fact its the opposite. The default (when nothing is stated) its "all rights reserved", that means that nobody is allowed to copy or reuse it. The only chance I see for "your" images is that you try to find the copyight holder, which is likely the photographer and/or drawer, and ask him if he likes to publish them under a free license of his choice ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommanded). If he agrees he has to send an email to the commons support team to confirm this - for details see Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 18:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Same deal here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:City_of_Detroit_Logo.png

Why would you delete this photo? The City's brand and style guide linked directly to this file. This image was put here FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE THAT PEOPLE COULD ACCESS IT. Why would you have deleted that photo? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:405:4100:23C7:9C35:1C3A:3E9F:B29E (talk) 06:45, 09 October 2015 (UTC)

Because it was declared as own work of the uploader, which is obviously not the case. --JuTa 07:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, --Image was deleted after I've sent the license of the Photographer/pic owner and changed it to OTRS pending exactly like the instructions, almost two weeks ago. any way to check it out please?--Nolecro (talk) 16:55, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

The problem was the missing license template on the description page. If you know under which of these licenses (a loong list) the copyright holder likes to publish the image, tell me here, and i will restore it. regards. --JuTa 17:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you JuTa, that would be Attriubution - {{Attribution}} – Copyrighted, but freely usable given the copyright holder is credited. --Nolecro (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

OK,  Done. --JuTa 23:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you JuTa, can it be used now officialy without getting deleted? --Nolecro (talk) 18:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Better you wait untill the release is confirmed by an OTRS member. --JuTa 18:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

THank you JuTa, it's more than three weeks now, the request. several emails were sent with owner approvements, etc. What could be done? --Nolecro (talk) 18:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, that could take weeks, sometimes months. Look into Category:OTRS pending... You could try to ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case. It would help if you note the ticket number there if you have one. regards. --JuTa 19:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Ahmad Alam ul-Hoda

In Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonia Sevilla, I wrote:

Those other two are cropped from Sonia Sevilla’s own originals (not listed in this DR), now aptly linked with {{Extracted from}} and {{Extracted image}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I vote  keep for the four crops, always dependant, of course, on the status of their originals. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Yet you deleted the crops and left the originals (these two) untouched. I’d expect you to either keep the crops, or file DRs for the originals. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I didn't deleted them. It was User:Hedwig in Washington who did that. Perhaps you ask her for her reasons. regards. --JuTa 06:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Yep, me again. :-) Somehow these two files got into the deletion pile. Restored and kept template added. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

SGKozlova

Dear JuTa,

We have sent a request for a license for photos prof. S.Gabuda in permissions-ru@wikimedia.org ([Ticket#2015091110003824] license permission). Denis Bratchuk led a discussion with us.

Queries were from the newspaper "Science in Siberia", from photographers Mackiewicz, Kozlova and Davydov, In October 2015. We have not received an answer yet. Please, restore our photos and tell me what needs to be done.

Yours sincerely SGKozlova — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGKozlova (talk • contribs) 08:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Please talk to User:D.bratchuk or ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case. If everythink checks out OK they will undelete the files for you. regards. --JuTa 13:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gonzalez Tunon Raul - La rosa blindada.pdf

Please delete it. It has copyright. I accidentally uploaded it when uploading a bulk of PDF files from that institution. Thanks! --Scanno (talk) 12:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

OK,  Done. --JuTa 14:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Seriously??????

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Submarino S01.jpg

Have you read all the information about the requirements of that web to upload photos??? Really i doubt very much...

Like say we in spanish... "no hay peor ciego que quien no quiere ver" (more or less... The worst blind is the blind who refuses to see); i preffer think that.

Takashi kurita (talk) 09:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes seriously. This photo stongly looks like taken in the 1940s perhaps 1950s, which makes it very unlikely that it was uploaded by the original photographer to that website. If you like you might raise an Commons:Undeletion request. May be you convince another admin. regards. --JuTa 09:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Nope... you are wrong like i knew..... you can see in the photo one ship with the hull number D-36; this ship is the Ariete, comisioned in the spanish navy in 1961 and sunk in 1966. You has failed.

Takashi kurita (talk) 17:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Even if its the 1960s its very unlikely uploaded by the original photogapher. You wont convince me but perhaps some other admin(s). See above...--JuTa 17:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

PS: The uploader is likely him or him, born 1960. So he would had to take the image with maximum 6 years. --JuTa 17:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Oslo-Forum-Logo.jpg

Hallo JuTa, ich hab gesehen, dass ich bei https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oslo-Forum-Logo.jpg das PD-textlogo template nicht richtig eingefügt hatte. Das habe ich inzwischen gefixt. Da es sich um ein Logo aus Text und einfachen geografischen Formen handelt, sollte das Problem damit denke ich aus der Welt sein. Die kreative Schwelle die einen OTRS Request nötig machen würde ist meiner Meinung nach nicht überschritten. --Timoluege (talk) 08:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, eher grenzwertig das mit der kreativen Schwelle, aber von meiner Seite OK. --JuTa 09:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

{{Npd}} on a {{Fair use delete}}

Hi JuTa - could you please help me understand your re-addition of {{Npd}} to File:Richard Mohaupt 1954 (New York Philharmonic Leon Levy Digital Archives, photographer Paul Duckworth).jpg? Clearly the photo must be deleted here, but I believe {{Npd}} is incorrect: we are not missing evidence of permission. I think it should be speedied once it is re-uploaded to enwiki, no? Thanks, Storkk (talk) 14:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

As soon you know its on en: or where ever it should be transfered you can change the npd to speedy. But my impression is that no admin (including myself) realy looks after Category:Pending fair use deletes frequently, so that those images would stay forever. regards --JuTa 17:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Ah... I thought (per the category description page) that a bot took care of that. But Fae's bot appears to be inactive. Storkk (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, I couln't find any activities of that bot - see here. --JuTa 17:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes... this is the problem. I've updated the category page to reflect present reality. Thanks. Storkk (talk) 20:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Prophet Muhammad's birth place, now library.jpg

Hi JuTa, I transferred this file to Commons from Arabic wikipedia where it has licensing status. The Google translation translates it as the following This work established in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which is now in the public domain because the protection period has elapsed in accordance with the protection of copyright law in Saudi Arabia (Article XXIV). This work is to achieve one of the following conditions exist: This workbook photographic work or an audio or visual voice, has been more than twenty-five years of production. This is another type of business, it has passed fifty years on the author's death. Rafe to file: Please provide information about the first publication of the image and the history of its author.

The Araic Wikipedia address is https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/ملف:مكتبة_مكة_المكرمة.jpg Where there is a url as source of the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsceticRose (talk • contribs) 05:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

It seems the work is now in public domain. Now what should be done? AsceticRose (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please try to find the corresponding commons template on Commons:Copyright tags and add that template to the file description page, which is likely {{PD-Saudi Arabia}}. You should also reapply tze original source an original publication date. regards. --JuTa 06:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Recent uploads

{{PD-self}} did this as suggested, OK? Keith-264 (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

If you took the photos yourself, yes. You should then add an {{Own}} to the souce field as well. A license for the depicted documents would be still required. Maybe you find a suitable in Commons:Copyright tags. --JuTa 18:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, depicted documents, do you mean the pdf? Once the formalities are complete, how do I link a reference template in Wiki to the item?Keith-264 (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I mean the photos where (hopefully) you photographed some UK WW2 documents. I assume those documents are in PD meanwhile, but i couldn't find a suitable license for that case. Just add that license template like you did it for PD-self. --JuTa 19:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

{{tl|own}} done, thanks for your help, is it always this complicated? Keith-264 (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

{{PD-UKGov}} will this do?Keith-264 (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure. The text within the template is only about photos and art but not about text or documents. Perhaps you ask on Commons:Village pump/copyright. --JuTa 19:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Me neither, this? {{PD-UKGov}}Keith-264 (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thats the same as before. Again: please ask on Commons:Village pump/copyright. --JuTa 19:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:OGL3 this one I mean. Keith-264 (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Could be, but I'm not sure. Thats the reason why you should as on --> Commons:Village pump/copyright <-- --JuTa 19:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, just done it. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Bodegas López de Heredia.jpg

Hallo JuTa, ob die Löschung des Bildes gerechtfertigt war will ich gar nicht in Frage stellen. Was aber ist mit meiner Bildbeschreibung? Die ist nun auch weg und war keine URV!--Symposiarch (talk) 21:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Ähh, ohne das Bild macht die Bilbeschreibungsseite keinen Sinn, wenn ein Bild gelöscht wird, wird dessen Beschreibungsseite immer mit gelöscht. Oder welche Beschreibung meinst Du wo genau? (bitte verlinken) Gruß --JuTa 21:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Die Bildbeschreibung enthielt die Information das das Weingut eine renommierte (relevante) Architektin mit dem Bau eines Objekts beauftragt hat. Siehe [1].--Symposiarch (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Dann füg diese Information ohne Bild, aber am besten mit externem Beleg wieder ein. Gruß --JuTa 08:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Ja, das ist die pragmatische Lösung, aber die ungerechtfertigte Löschung der Bildbeschreibung bleibt bestehen.--Symposiarch (talk) 15:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Das ist immer so, wird ein Bild gelöscht wird es danach von Bots auch aus den Artikeln gelöscht incl. der Beschreibung, denn prakisch immer macht eine Bildbeschreibung ohne Bild keinen Sinn. Gruß --JuTa 15:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Eine Subform des Vandalismus ist dies schon! Schließlich ist die Beschreibung keine URV. Als Troll würde ich hier ein Riesenfass aufmachen, aber ich lasse es für meinen Teil hier gut sein.--Symposiarch (talk) 02:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Wappen von Terenten

	Wappen von Terenten
	Hallo, ich habe die Lizenz geändert. Bin aber nicht sicher, ob es die richtige ist. Ich habe das Bild selbst gezeichnet. Es ist aber das Wappen einer Gemeinde in Italien. Was würdest Du mir raten? Gruß Gliwi Gliwi (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Sieht für mich soweit gut aus. Gruß --JuTa 16:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Amadalogo.jpegに関して

初めまして。この度はご連絡ありがとございます。

あなた様よりご指摘頂きましたFile:Amadalogo.jpegのライセンスに関してですが。一応このページには出典先であるURL（http://www.kaisha-logo.com/detail_216.html） 、及び作者（株式会社ビズアップ）も掲示していたのですが、どのライセンスを使用すれば良いのか分からなかったため、今回の事になったのだと思います。

それで申し訳ありませんが、どうしても画像は消したくないので、適切なライセンスを教えていただきましたら、早速それを貼ろうと思うのですが、宜しいでしょうか？

--筑紫太郎 (talk) 02:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

 Info Google Translation:

How do you do. This time Thank you thank you contact us.

File gave pointed out than you like your: I respect the license of Amadalogo.jpeg but. Tentatively URL for this page is a source destination (http://www.kaisha-logo.com/detail_216.html), and author (Corporation Bizuappu) also but I had posted, if you use any license because we do not know what good, I think you became this thing.

So there is no excuse, because I do not want to absolutely image poppy, Once I learned the appropriate license, and I think immediately that it would halo it, but you sure you want?

★Poké⁹⁵ 02:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi 筑紫太郎, every image on commons needs a valid license template on its description page - see Commons:Licensing. In this case it is likely {{PD-textlogo}} - see also Commons:Copyright tags. regards. --JuTa 08:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

thanks

for the uncaT tag - I was previously known as SatuSuro and now JarrahTree, and the/my ageing brain has lost the plot about re-configuring personal sub pages for galleries from the one name to the new, I may well have done it wrong... JarrahTree (talk) 08:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

You are wellcome. But please note: Category:User:JarrahTree/sub pages is not existing. You should create it i.e. with {{User category}} or change the perent category of Category:User:JarrahTree. --JuTa 09:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice and understanding JarrahTree (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Mario Bürki.gif

File:Mario Bürki.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 17:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:J-Pimp

Thanks for rollbacking. Something went wrong. But it still needs fixing. Category:Hip-hop is a redirected one. I don't want to start an edit war, so fix it yourself, please. Greetings from Poland :-) Wieralee (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

You are very wellcome and thx for this note - its fixed now too. --JuTa 22:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

2 Images

I refer to File:1976Oct6-FangChihPreparesDisasterRelief.jpg and 1976Oct6-ChineseEarthquakeRelief.jpg which you tagged as not sufficient information on copyright. I inform you that the images in question are in the public domain and have incorporated the relevant tags. Unless you have further objection, I shall remove your tag of insufficient copyright information within 2 days.MargaritaPoppa (talk) 04:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi MargaritaPoppa, I wonder why you contacting me, as I didn't added the problem tags, but anyhow: You added "a bit" to many license templates to the description pages. 3 of them looking clearly not valid because a 1976 photo cannot be older than 50 years and is not the contitution, a translation, a slogan, a literary work or a test question. Only {{PD-ROC-official}} might be valid, depending what other documents prepared by civil servants exactly means. Does documents include photos in this case or not. And are they realy made by civil servants in the course of carrying out their duties. I will convert the problem tags into regular deletion requests (DR) by that reason. And please don't remove that DR template, but bring your arguments to the corresponing deletion request pages. regards. --JuTa 07:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion of File:Coprolite 4780s.jpg

Hi, JuTa! We now have an Template:OTRS ticket releasing this image under CC0 1.0 public domain. Can you restore? Ping me if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi KDS4444, I undeleted the file and renewed the poblem tag. Please complete your OTRS task now. regards --JuTa 07:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Photos of Russian monuments

You have recently deleted a bunch of photos of Russian monuments. I tried to make it explicit that these images are part of WLM and they will be transferred to other projects, but this may not happen before October 31 because we have to deal with more than a thousand of such images, and we have a particular procedure to do this. We do not simply transfer things that are nominated for deletion. Note also that another deletion request of the same type has been closed as kept, because I promised (and several of Commons admins accepted this) to provide a list of non-FoP images for deletion after October 31.

Therefore, I request temporary undeletion of all files that you have just deleted, and they should not be deleted again before October 31. Thank you! --Alexander (talk) 19:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I will undelete them as soon you are ready for the tansfer. Please contact me again at that time. regards. --JuTa 19:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

This is not possible. My scripts for transfer rely on the fact that images are available on Commons, and this is the only way to process hundreds of images without transferring each image manually. I can't make exceptions.

Hedwig in Washington, Jean-Frédéric, Ymblanter: as usual, your opinion will be appreciated. --Alexander (talk) 19:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hmmm, so your script is allready running and you expect it will run for another 2 weeks to complete the tranfers? --JuTa 19:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

It is more than one script because files have to be selected, linked from other projects, and eventually transferred (fair-use images can't be transferred to a project where they are not used). If you have a working algorithm, please, provide one. But as long as we do it ourselves, we have the right to decide how to organize file transfer within the time frame that has been agreed upon by several Commons admins. -Alexander (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Here you can see that your deletion has caused serious damage to our lists of monuments. Another solution is that you transfer these files yourself if you want to have these files deleted immediately and believe that manual transfer of selected files is a better process than automatic file transfer. --Alexander (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, they are back temporarily. Please let me know as soon as the transfers are done. I will redelete them latest early November. PS: The DRs are: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by FengMoLong and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Юлия Мустафаева. --JuTa 20:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Alexander (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for being late! Yeah, the transfer takes time. Thanks for keeping the files alive, JuTa! If I can be of any help, give me a ring! :-) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Same! Sounds like a good plan :) Jean-Fred (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

The files have been transferred and can be deleted. --Alexander (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Thx and  Done. --JuTa 20:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Lizenz für Bilder

Hallo, JuTa

die genannten Bilder der Dorfkirchen sind aus Sachsens Kirchengalerie, erschienen um 1840, verfügbar auf

http://digital.slub-dresden.de/werkansicht/dlf/14210/221/0/ Altenhof

http://digital.slub-dresden.de/werkansicht/dlf/14210/222/0/ Altleisnig

http://digital.slub-dresden.de/werkansicht/dlf/14210/225/0/ Börtewitz, Bockelwitz

Ich hatte {{PD-old-100}} angegeben, da die Bilder älter als 100 Jahre sind. Auf einen anderen Einfall bin ich nicht gekommen, die Anleitungen sind nicht besonders übersichtlich. Was soll ich tun?

Es ist immerhin interessant, dass es Abzüge diese Bilder im Kunsthandel noch gibt. Sie sind für Sachsens Kirchengalerie angefertigt, also liegen doch wohl die Rechte beim Verlag. Ich habe die Bilder jedenfalls nicht gekauft und gescannt, es sind hunderte in den verschiedenen Lieferungen. Es wäre vor allem für Altleisnig schade, wenn das Bild verschwinden würde: die Kirche steht nicht mehr.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Gentzsch (talk) 07:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Gentzsch, die Lizenz ist auch völlig korrekt. Der einzige "Fehler" wasr, dass die Vorlage {{Remove this line and insert a license instead}} auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite war. Solche Bilder enthalten normalerweise gar keine Lizenzvorlage. Ich nutze einige halbautomatische Tools um solche Bilder zu finden und als "no license" zu markieren. Dabei wurden dann auch Deine Bilder makiert. Das hatte ich aber kurz darauf bemerkt und die Bildbeschreibungsseiten entsprechend korregiert. Gruß --JuTa 07:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, JuTa. Herzlichen Dank, da bin ich aber erleichtert, ich liebe diese Bilder und will im weiteren noch mehr hochladen (die zum Kloster Buch gehörten). Ich finde aber den Link auf diesen Kunsthändler nicht wieder, vielleicht kaufe ich mir doch eins. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Gentzsch (talk) 11:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

File:WEG-LogoFinal-V1.png

Thank you JuTa but I have to disagree with you. The file in question (above) is fairly used and specifically and ONLY posted on the Wikipedia article pertaining to the World Education Games WEG, thus, again, no violation whatsoever has occurred. --MarkYabloko (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, on commons fair use is not accepted -compare Commons:Fair use and i.e. en:Wikipedia:Fair use. You might uploa it to some local projects where fair use is accepted. regards. --JuTa 20:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks JuTa. The question then, would be, how the file ended up on Common rather than on Wikipedia itself. --MarkYabloko (talk) 11:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Because you uploaded it to Commons and not to Wikipedia. regards. --JuTa 13:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, pt. 2

Thanks for catching my error with File:Christ Church Detroit 1934.jpg, where I replaced {{HABS}} with the nonexistent {{PD-USGov-HABS}}. I'd thought that the latter was the actual name of the template (it's really {{PD-USGov-Interior-HABS}}), so that's why I left it thus without checking. I've now created PD-USGov-HABS as a redirect to the full name, and since it's more precise than the simple PD-USGov that you added, I've removed that tag and put "back" the template that didn't exist before. Nyttend (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

You are wellcome. --JuTa 14:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-HK-PR

JuTa why are you deleting files related to still open Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-HK-PR? Could you restore them until discussion is closed? --Jarekt (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I am currently working on to close it. regards. --JuTa 16:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

May I ask that you undelete all the Hong Kong road signs that were deleted, so that I can review them in a separate DR? Fry1989 ^eh? 18:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, you had 11 days to review them. They contained all non-trivial pictograms like people or similar. I mainly followed user:Taivo who changed a lot of them to {{PD-simple}} or similar, but not all. The rest was IMHO above COM:TOO. You might like to raise a Commons:Undeletion request. Perhaps you are able to convince another admin. regads. --JuTa 22:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I requested they be all kept and then done in a separate DR. Considering you deleted a few that are indeed PD, such as File:Hong Kong road sign (Expressway Ends).svg (which is identical to File:UK traffic sign 2931.svg), I don't think my request is too unreasonable. However if you prefer I go through unDR, I will do so. Fry1989 ^eh? 23:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, please do so. --JuTa 23:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg

Hallo, Die Datei hatte zehntausende einbindungen. Bitte vorsuchtig sein beim Löschen. Es waren auch 62311 delinkungen bei Delinker gequeued welche ich nun per hand aus der db gelöscht habe. Beste grüße :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Kreuzenzian- Bläulinge

Hallo JuTa, ich bin leider ein völliger Noob hier und wollte nur ein paar Insektenfotos beisteuern. Mir ist leider nicht ganz klar, was mit der Lizenz nicht stimmen könnte. Es handelt sich um ein Foto, das ich selbst gemacht habe. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20150617-IMG_9796-b.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carsten Siegel (talk • contribs) 20:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Carsten, es ist schön, dass Du Fotos hier hochlädst. Es fehlte zu Anfang halt ein Lizenz-Baustein. Den hast Du nun hinzugefügt - siehe hier, und ich habe den Problem-Baustein entfernt - siehe hier. Damit ist alles wieder gut. Gruß --JuTa 20:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Axe Majeur - Belvedere - Cergy Saint-Christophe.jpg

Yours sincerely, kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank...

...dass du mir gezählte 23 mal den gleichen Bot-Hinweis auf meine Benutzerdisk knallst, sodass bei meinem PC nichts mehr ging. Drei Zeilen hätten zur Aufklärung auch genügt und alles wäre binnen weniger Minuten erledigt gewesen. Ich hatte {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} gemeint und wusste nicht, dass die von mir gewählte Lizenz nicht mehr gültig ist. So kann man sich auch seine Freizeit vertreiben. Schönes Wochenende Steindy (talk) 21:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Tja, ich überprüf' halt von Zeit zu Zeit neu hochgeladene Dateien ohne Lizenz, und drück dann pro Datei auf "no license". Gruß --JuTa 21:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

One of your old deletion requested may need to be renominated

Hello. Earlier this year you created Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ana Ambrazienė.jpg with the comment "I can't find an external source to doubt own work as claimed". There were no other comments for or against deletion. Today I found that it appears to have been copied from this Facebook image dated June 2011. I have also left a note about this for User:Natuur12, the closing administrator. -- Zyxw (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Thx for the info. I marked it now as copyright violation. --JuTa 05:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violation: File:Vitória da Conquista.jpeg

12:23, 1 November 2015 JuTa (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Vitória da Conquista.jpeg (Copyright violation: copyvio (as indicated) via http://fotos.sapo.pt/johnvadio/fotos/panor-mica-vit-ria-conquista/?uid=Pp1SzZ58JQnZEUsjDmUz (no CC available, Produzido por SAPO - Todos os direitos reservados)) (global usage; delinker log)

Hello JuTa, this photo is not a copyright violation. The mentions Made by SAPO - All rights reserved is about the service of the website and not about the photo (Produzido por SAPO - Todos os direitos reservados). In the condition terms of SAPO Fotos, says that the users needs to have the rights of the photos (Não pode colocar fotos sobre as quais não detenha os respetivos direitos de autor e conexos, bem como os direitos de imagem; - http://ajuda.sapo.pt/pt-pt/security/condicoes-de-utilizacao/condicoes-de-seguranca-sapo-fotos). I'm the owner of the photo, and I chose to license in CC in Wikimedia. When I uploaded in Wikimedia, I read in the upload form that if I have the same name or nickname from the website where were published before, It's not need to send email to send authorization, and both services Wikimedia and SAPO, I have the same nickname John Vadio. Thanks for your comprehension! --John Vadio (talk) 23:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello JuTa! Now I've added a description in the original photo published that the photo is licensed under CC, as you can see at http://fotos.sapo.pt/johnvadio/fotos/panor-mica-vit-ria-conquista/?uid=Pp1SzZ58JQnZEUsjDmUz. --John Vadio (talk) 03:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I undeleted the file an fixed the description page. regards. --JuTa 06:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

National Historical Museum (Albania)

Sorry if I caused you a lot of work in undoing all my speedy deletes. I thought the boiler plates in Category:National Historical Museum (Albania) were pretty clear, but apparently I misunderstood. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, FOP cases are generally not for speedy deletion. So I converting them to regular deletion requests. Next time please use regular deletion requests directly in such cases. Thx. --JuTa 20:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Just so that I'm clear, how is it a FOP case if there is no possible FOP in Albania? I don't want to make the same mistake again. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

The images will likely get deleted. But they should be sorted to Category:Albanian FOP cases (I'll do that later) for a better history. And might be they can be undeleted in some years (i.e. Category:Undelete in 2050) if one finds out the name and the lifespan of the artist(s) and/or architect(s). regards. --JuTa 21:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

According to some quick research, the architect was en:Enver Faja who died in 2011. The mosaic was made by Vilson Kilica, Anastas Kostandini, Agim Nebiu, Justin Droboniku, and Aleksander Filipi, some of whom are still alive, I think. Would it make sense to change the boiler plate that says "Photographs taken of [recently produced buildings] can be deleted without further warning" ? To me, that seemed a clear indication that a speedy was acceptable. Also, I recently put speedies on a large number of files from Category:Enver Hoxha Museum, some of which have already been deleted, in case you can fix those as well. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Well on COM:FOP#Uploading images covered under Freedom of Panorama to the Commons there is only a note to file a deletion request. Its common practice not to speedy FOP cases. I never saw FOP cases speedy deleted yet. But pehaps you like to discuss this with a bigger audiance i.e. on Commons:Village pump. regards. --JuTa 21:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

About the allready deleted images: Hmm, I am surpized that other admins seems to handle this differently. I think about if I wanna spent some time to ask them about it or not. --JuTa 21:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

By the way: The law of Albania can be changed - next week, next month, next year or next decade; in the case they will accept FOP we (or our grandchildren) would restore such pictures. For today - it's a pity, but FOP is not accepted there. Julo (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)