User talk:Helge Høifødt
Vår hjelpefil for nybegynnere og vår OSS (ofte stilte spørsmål) vil være til god hjelp etter at du har registrert deg. Disse sidene forklarer hvordan du skal endre på utseendet (for eksempel språk), hvordan du skal laste opp filer, og vår grunnleggende lisensieringspolitikk. Du trenger ingen tekniske ferdigheter for å bidra her. Vær modig i dine bidrag, og anta det beste i andres intensjoner. Dette er en wiki – det er virkelig enkelt.
Mer informasjon er tilgjengelig på brukerportalen. Du kan be om hjelp på Tinget eller på IRC-kanalen #wikimedia-commons. Du kan også kontakte administratorer på deres diskusjonssider. Hvis du har spesifikke spørsmål om opphavsrett, spør på Commons:License questions.
|
| |
(P.S. Ønsker du å gi tilbakemeldinger om denne beskjeden?) |
Orgullomoore 18:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. --Cnyborg 00:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. --Cnyborg 00:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hei. Her har du tatt et bilde av et kunstverk, men du oppgir ikke hvem kunstneren er. Kunstneren må ha vært død i 70 år for at du skal fritt kunne ta bilde av verket. Se Commons:Derivative works. Kan du finne ut av hvem kunstneren er? Hilsen Kjetil r 06:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- JEg fant forresten ut av det, kunstneren er Ellen Jacobsen, som fortsatt er i live. Bildet må nok derfor slettes. Kjetil r 06:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Forresten, kan du ta og føre på f.eks. {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} eller et annet passende lisensmerke på disse tre bildene? Mvh Kjetil r 06:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Jeg får ikke til å redigere inn den frasen du oppgir? Og hvior plasserer jeg slikt når jeg redigerer allerede opplastede bilder?Helge Høifødt 17:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Du åpner disse to lenkene: [1][2] og limer inn {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} nederst, under all teksten som står der fra før. Den siste så jeg at du hadde rettet på allerede, jeg la inn malen for deg. Hilsen Kjetil r 17:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hei. Jeg har lastet opp bildet på nytt, se Image:Wergeland statue.jpg. Siden du lastet det opp over et gammelt bilde ble ikke lisensvalget ditt registrert. Du må gå hit og bytte ut {{own work}} med {{PD-self}} eller hva du nå vanligvis bruker. Hilsen Kjetil r 19:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Lovinne_med_unger.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lovinne_med_unger.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cnyborg 19:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merkingen av dette og nedenstående bilder gjelder at det må angis hvem som er skulptøren, slik at det er klart om de er frie eller ikke. «Kvinne St Hanshaugen park.JPG» er slettet ettersom det var et klart brudd på opphavsrett, Bast døde i 1974. Cnyborg 19:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Skuylpturen ble satt opp i 1891 og jeg vil hevde at man da må kunne forutsette at det er tillatt å legge ut bilde. Det kan ikke være Wikipedias policy å ha så store sikkerhetsmarginer at man antar at skulptøren (ukjent, trolig i USA) var helt ung da han utførte arbeidet og at hans etterlatte vil påberope seg brudd på norsk åndsverkrett nå? Helge Høifødt 06:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Det høres ut som en grei margin, men du må være så snill å beskrive slikt på bildesiden. Det kan ikke forventes at andre brukere skal måtte gjøre jobben med å lete frem den informasjonen om igjen. Cnyborg 15:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Det skal jeg huske å gjøre. Takk for hjelpen. Helge Høifødt 15:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Det høres ut som en grei margin, men du må være så snill å beskrive slikt på bildesiden. Det kan ikke forventes at andre brukere skal måtte gjøre jobben med å lete frem den informasjonen om igjen. Cnyborg 15:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:StHanshaugen_fonteneskulptur.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:StHanshaugen_fonteneskulptur.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cnyborg 19:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Skulpturen ble tatt ned cirka 1910 og satt oppigjen på1990-tallet. Da må vi kunne legge til grunn at det er gått tilstrekkelig tid fra skulptørens (ukjent for meg) død til at vi kan publisere bilde. Helge Høifødt 06:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Svane_St_Hanshaugen_park.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Svane_St_Hanshaugen_park.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cnyborg 19:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Musikantene_St_Hanshaugen_park.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Musikantene_St_Hanshaugen_park.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cnyborg 19:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Knud Knudsens plass.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Michael Romanov (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Stensparken Kjarlighetskarusellen.JPG is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Vindretning Oslo.pdf was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Gamle regjeringsbygning vegg mot Høyesteretts plass.jpg was uncategorized on 10 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hei, har du noen innspill i denne diskusjonen? Hilsen --Kjetil_r 11:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Oslo fengsel Bennys butikk.JPG
[edit]Hello ! (Sorry for my bad English...I am Belgian and speak French.) For this photo : can you tell me si the objects made by the prisonners are sold only to visitors or to the prisonners too ? Its for an article on fr.wikipedia. Thank you very much to answer on my page. --Égoïté (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, the shop is for the public, see the homesite Benny Butikk (only in Norwegian). There are no information indicating that prisoners can use it. Best wishes, Helge Høifødt (talk) 08:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hej Helge! File:Berzelii park entrance.JPG som du har laddat upp verkar vara lite trasig. Om originalet är oskadat och du har kvar det vore det väldigt bra om du kan göra ett nytt försök att ladda upp bilden. Tack! —LX (talk, contribs) 16:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Sollerud
[edit]På File:Sollerud gard.JPG og File:Sollerud strand.JPG har du satt en beskrivelse: "Sollerud, Lysaker, Norway". Men Sollerud og gården den er kalt opp etter er vel på Oslosiden og derfor ikke Lysaker, og for det andre kanskje også et eget strøk (ref Oslo byleksikon)? Kan jeg fjerne Lysaker ordet i beskrivelsen? Yosh3000 (talk) 00:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ja, enig. Helge Høifødt (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kare Berg.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kare Berg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kare Berg.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Captain-tucker (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Musikantene_St_Hanshaugen_park.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
89.8.242.183 12:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Helge Høifødt⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Helge Høifødt,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Idioten.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—FritsHG Question? 13:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Måken av Pablo Picasso Y-blokken Regjeringsklvartalet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 21:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lars Hansen VKM.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lars Hansen VKM.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Jeg har lagt inn navn på fotograf, formidlet av LE Hanssen og sendt all info om opphavspersoner og lisens til permissions@, med valg av lisens. Hva mer skal jeg gjøre? Helge Høifødt (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Uranienborgparken3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ketil3 (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Gamle Aker prestegård
[edit]Så vidt jeg forstår, forholder det seg slik at Akersbakken 33 er nåværende adresse (jf. Finn Kart mfl.) og Bergstien 4 tidligere (jf. kart fra 1940), ikke omvendt, som det står nå. Skrik ut hvis du er uenig. Ellers foreslår jeg navneendring eller i det minste endret beskrivelse. – Vinguru (talk) 13:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Veggmaleri Kolstadgata 15 Tøyen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |