User talk:Gunnex/Archive 8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 → Archive 12

Por favor No quiero que BORREN las imágenes

Es enserio quiero las imágenes para el proyecto que estoy realizando, por favor no quiero que las BORREN, por favor, necesito estas imágenes. Ó díganme ¿Cómo puedo conservarlas? ¿hay alguna manera de que pudiera conservar las imágenes?, éstas imágenes son fotos antiguas e históricas y es por eso que quiero conservarlas CDGJ965commons (talk) 23:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pt:WP:URC

Olá, essa política diz: "Não serão permitidas imagens com mais de 500 pixels de altura." Poderia dar sua opinião em pt:Wikipédia Discussão:Café dos eliminadores#Imagens acima de 500 px de altura. Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Sinceramente falando o assunto não me interessa mais já que na minha época ativa na ptwiki marquei centenas de imagens para eliminação que não respeitavam URC por diversas razóes. Mesmo assim: Antigamente me orientei somente pela altura da imagem como indicado em px. Eu não me lembro mais como tratei imagens vectorizados tipo .svg que possam ter no upload original < 501px mas que de fato oferecem tamanhos maiores. Exemplos: pt:Ficheiro:EscudoKronaFutsal.svg (> 500px), pt:Ficheiro:Reuters logo.svg, pt:Ficheiro:Logotipo do SBT.svg etc.
Por curiosidade: como você elaborou a sua lista pt:Usuário:Rodrigolopes/Imagens acima de 500 px de altura? Via API? Na época usei este API request (no exemplo para ficheiros carregados 01.02.2015-20.02.2015) e procurei na lista por "height": 5 para encontrar ficheiros com altura de 5XX (continuando a procura com "height": 6, "height": 7 (...etc...) "height": 10 (...etc...).
O ficheiro mencionado na discussão já consta no Commons via File:1895-9-8-foto-monumento-batalha-de-Magul.jpg (usei o título idêntico porque às vezes um título diferente quebra o "For the Common Good"). Espero que o uploader foi preciso em indicar "Henrique Mitchell de Paiva Couceiro" (1861—1944) como autor já que não consegui verificar a data da inauguração do monumento e o suposto autor não se destacava como fotógrafo... Gunnex (talk) 16:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado pela resposta Gunnex. Para gerar aquela lista usei o seguinte código no quarry
USE ptwiki_p;
SELECT DISTINCT CONCAT('* [[:Ficheiro:', i.img_name, ']]') FROM image i
INNER JOIN page p ON p.page_title = i.img_name AND p.page_namespace = 6
INNER JOIN categorylinks c ON c.cl_from = p.page_id AND c.cl_to = 'Imagens_de_conteúdo_restrito'
WHERE i.img_height > 500

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice :-) Obrigado! Gunnex (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please examine this file?

Hi Gunnex! Don't worry, I won't ask you to keep pictures for a project I'm working on! I can't believe what he wrote, especially since he can keep those pictures in many places, including his hard drive, Instagram, a Facebook album, etc.! Outrageous! Anyway, I found a file that I'm 100% sure is not own work but it doesn't seem to be on the Internet. Here it is: File:LisaSmit.jpg. That's a professional job, clearly, but since I can't find it anywhere, I suspect it's a screenshot from one of the movies she's acted in. Do you have a technique or the necessary skills to prove this theory? Do screenshots and regular camera shots have different types of data? I have zero skills, so please, is there anything you can do? Many thanks! Dontreader (talk) 04:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!
"Do you have a technique or the necessary skills to prove this theory?? Not really... well, besides File:PieterJanHagens.jpg dpc resolution is in the metadata, which can be commonly found (but not always) in (video) screenshots. Coincidence (?): Besides Lisa Smit all actors/presenters were present at nl:Wie is de Mol?, a Dutch reality TV show. Lisa Smit herself, Daniel Boissevain and Patrick Martens (the other uploads) are also acting in the current airing Dutch TV reality show nl:De Zeven Zeeën, started on March 30. Eventually, it may be worth to ask uploader via deletion request for further details and orginal metadata.
"Do screenshots and regular camera shots have different types of data?" Yes, but exif data is manipulable by software or may be lost if the original file was edited/compressed. Some tools you may use to check exif data and get an impression what metadata could be available:
Happy hunting :-)
Gunnex (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, Gunnex! Many thanks for your reply. I appreciate the research you did with the files uploaded by that user. It makes sense to suspect that those files are screenshots from that TV reality show, but I don't feel competent enough to nominate them for deletion! I just know that those files are not own work... impossible! The quality is too good and the uploader surely did not have the chance to be so close to all of those actors. And even if he did, he would not release those pictures to Commons. Thanks for the tools! That's very kind of you! I will have to check them out sooner than later, but these days I've been nominating articles for deletion as if there was no tomorrow! Even with a new trick that I discovered for finding pictures, it requires time and effort. And just in case someone deletes the Lisa Smit picture, I saved it already! :) Thanks again! Dontreader (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Feel free to contact me for further questions. Btw & just for curiosity: "Even with a new trick that I discovered for finding pictures (...)"? Please tell me more :-) Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta

En qué parte se te pueden dejar mensajes? Mil perdones por escribir aquí, pero no encuentro dónde responder a las discusiones. Saludos.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rojo Bermellón (talk • contribs)

Hi! Right here (or below the last entry of this page). Did you already check Commons:Primeros pasos? Gunnex (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hino do Estado do Ceará.ogg

Olá Gunnex! Vejo que você colocou para exclusão o File:Hino do Estado do Ceará.ogg. Bem, o arquivo tem a Permissão/Licenciamento bem parcido com os outros 5 arquivos da Category:Anthems of States of Brazil, então você poderia ver se os outros arquivos estão dentro das regras do Commons, por favor? Obrigado! --Porto Neto (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! De quem e quando foi feita a gravação? Parece uma gravação atual. A letra e as notas possam ser em domínio pública - a interpretação musical não. Você não especificou a fonte ("http://www.ceara.gov.br/" é o site principal = "2015 - Governo do Estado do Ceará. Todos os direitos reservados."). Na Category:Anthems of States of Brazil há ficheiros que vou nomear para eliminação por não apresentar informações suficientes e por serem obviamente roubados do Internet (como File:Hino de Pernambuco.ogg). Gunnex (talk) 19:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Na verdade o arquivo não é meu, só estou vigiando mesmo. De qualquer forma, Obrigado!--Porto Neto (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upss :-), então obrigado por ter avisado. Gunnex (talk) 20:20, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agora, vou mostrar-lhe outros arquivos suspeitos (agora são hinos municipais): File:Hino de taubaté.ogg, File:Hino de São João de Meriti.ogg, File:Hino da cidade do Salvador.ogg, File:Hino de Cacoal Cantado.ogg, File:Hino de Comodoro - MT.ogg, File:Video Hino de Charqueada.ogg, File:Hino do Municipio de São Mateus do Sul.ogg e File:Hino de Nilópolis.ogg. Obrigado! --Porto Neto (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ver Commons:Deletion requests/Anthems of Brazilian municipalities. Gunnex (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor, veja também os arquivos enviados por User:Josevaldo Filho. Ele acha que o Commons é Facebook (cheio de fotos dele e da família dele, além de certificados), e tem uma bandeira e um brasão que ele diz ser o autor. Obrigado!--Porto Neto (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--> Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Josevaldo Filho. Gunnex (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex, o User:Wsdantas fez um comentário difamando você em Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Josevaldo Filho. Ele disse que você ignora a lei, sendo que ele mesmo alterou o licenciamento, dos arquivos que ele cita, depois de você ter colocado para eliminação por não ser "trabalho próprio". Ou seja, ele está tentando sujar sua imagem.--Porto Neto (talk) 02:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ele comentou também em Commons:Deletion requests/Anthems of Brazilian municipalities.--Porto Neto (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex, uma imagem me incomoda muito sempre quando vejo a Category:Fortaleza, e hoje resolvi mostrar-lhe para que você tome a providência adequada. Essa é a imagem: File:Henrique.png (mesmas características da maioria das fotos de Josevaldo Filho). Obrigado!--Porto Neto (talk) 03:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Esse também: File:Jonys de Castro.jpg. Obrigado!--Porto Neto (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --> Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jonys de Castro.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Esse me parece suspeito: File:Moja republika.ogg. Obrigado! --Porto Neto (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido de opinião

Olá. Talvez se interesse em participar desse requerimento. Sds! --HVL talk 19:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --> [1]. Gunnex (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do you have a moment to examine a situation?

Hi Gunnex! I know you are very busy but I have encountered a strange situation in a deletion discussion that I opened. You once helped me to decide to withdraw a nomination (the F/A-18 picture), so maybe your knowledge could help me here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arrasate-mondragon.jpg. The uploader is interesting because he has a ton of pictures that have been threatened with deletion, yet he has been able to defend many of them very well, so they were kept on many occasions, and in some cases it seems as if pictures were deleted but he fought for them successfully to be undeleted. This time, if you can check, his best defense is that he uploaded a fuller (uncropped) version of the picture nominated for deletion, to try to prove that he took the picture, instead of a random guy in Spain who claims that it is his. The dates might have some value too, as well as the quality of the pictures when you compare them, maybe. My main concern is that the "original" photo that he posted in the deletion discussion might be from a magazine, and I still haven't learned the techniques you showed me. Could you please take a look? And any other thoughts of yours in that deletion discussion would be very much appreciated. I'm going kind of crazy with this situation, so please help me! But if you are too busy, I'll understand. Dontreader (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As indicated the copyright holder is most likely Hhmb — and it was correct to withdraw the nomination. Republisher of images originally uploaded at Commons often don't care about providing source, attribution & license as requested by the related uploaders --> see also Category:Files reused by external parties out of compliance with licensing terms. The photo is also not a scan from a magazine print (too dusty), or better: it was never printed by El Correo: The source http://tusfotos.elcorreo.com ("tus fotos" --> "your photos") is just a photo hosting service offered by El Correo, where everybody (after registration) can host virtually his own (supposed) images. To insinuate somebody (who uploaded an image in 2006) a copyright violation based only on because someone else republished the photo in identical res 5 years later in 2011 is quite contradictory & fallacious.
Long-term copyright violations are quite hard to find and the process is time-consuming (Internet changing all day, domains disappearing etc.) but sometimes gives some positive results, as shown (recent example) here. Gunnex (talk) 08:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gunnex! Thanks for leaving me a notice on my talk page because the system continues to fail to notify me when your talk page is modified (with other talk pages it works fine - strange!), and thanks for the very detailed explanation of the situation! As you know, I was fooled by the fact that El Correo is a well-known newspaper in Spain; also, the user "AngelMara" not only claims that the picture is his, but he also describes the picture, writing that it's the beginning of the street where he was born. The problem is that I wasn't born yesterday, but I gave that impression when I nominated that file for deletion! If the newspaper showed that picture in a real article (not a photo hosting section), attributing it to someone, then maybe it could have been nominated, but even in that case the date would have been a problem if it was 2011 (compared to 2006, when it was uploaded to Commons). Also, thanks for confirming that the photo was not scanned from a physical magazine. Later I will study the other links that you generously provided (I took a look, and clearly it will take me a while to understand that information). I really do appreciate the time you put into helping me with this situation, and I'm happy that you said that it was correct to withdraw the nomination. Have a great day! Dontreader (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Favor

Oi Gunnex, tudo bem? Sei que você não tem mais paciência para a ptwiki, mas queria te pedir para dar uma olhada num artigo da dewiki e me dizer se tem algo a ver com o artigo da ptwiki. Se não quiser se meter na discussão, pode me responder aqui mesmo. O artigo é de:Randow (Adelsgeschlecht) e o seu suposto correspondete é pt:Von Randow (Nobreza). O autor (pt:User:Geterson von Randow) alega que os dois "em nada diferem", mas sou de-0 e não consigo nem saber do que se trata... Topa? José Luiz disc 22:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Boa parte do artigo (principalmente o começo até a seção "Duas Linhas" + seção "E na Nova Zelândia" e o final começando pela seção "Propriedades da Família") é uma mera tradução da dewiki. A seção pt:Von Randow (Nobreza)#Randows no Brasil a partir do parágrafo começando com "No jornal dos Imigrantes desta colônia, no ano de 1853 (...)" até "(...) Eles tiveram nove filhas e cinco filhos." foi copiado de http://familiavonrandow.wix.com/info#!historia/cjg9 (use o cache para poder melhor comparar). A seção pt:Von Randow (Nobreza)#Brasão é bem parecida com o texto já publicado anteriormente via http://familiavonrandow.wix.com/info#!brasao/c1ubd (© Copyright 2014 Família von Randow.). Somando: ""em nada diferem" --> bom, literalmente eles diferem sim, mas só pelo tamanho do conteúdo (especialmente "Randows no Brasil" e "Brasão"), mas o resto é muito ligado com o artigo na dewiki. Portanto, consideria parte da sua justificativa " (...) Sem interwikis relevantes (...) como equívoco. Gunnex (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Boa! Obrigado! José Luiz disc 10:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A problem with the license

Hi Gunnex! Although this file has been published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, there is a problem with it to be copied to Wikimedia Commons via CommonsHelper. I couldn't figure out the problem, would you mind to let me know how to fix its problem please? Thank you. FaraM 06:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Maybe CommonsHelper is down? You may (as an alternative) try out the transfer tool "For the Common Good", available at en:User:This, that and the other/For the Common Good. Please check before transferring if not COM:FOP#Iran issues are involved (building of en:Senate of Iran, designed by architect Heydar Ghiaï (1922—1985) in 1955). There may be also other copyright issues involved considering previously published at http://www.cabein.com/cabein/2009/03/04/persian-architcture/ (2009) = http://www.cabein.com/cabein/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/766px-senat_03.jpg which leads to File:Senat_03.jpg uploaded by Yghiai in 2007 but which was deleted in 01.2010 due to missing permission. en:File:Dome of the Tehran Senate House, 1971 (internal view).jpg (uploaded 2 month later in 03.2010 at enwiki) appears to be a reupload. Gunnex (talk) 08:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons users

Wow, you just nominated a whole heck of a lot of photos for deletion. I checked over a bunch of them and found really no problem with quite a few. Photos like File:St Johns Wilmot Church 03.JPG or File:Clarke Berrian House.JPG are probably self-taken, and other photos like File:New Rochelle land purchase 1688 02.jpg already had enough of an argument that I wouldn't have nominated it for deletion.--ɱ (talk) 14:16, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After reading about Jvolkblum I'm now convinced many of these photos (if not all of them) were uploaded by him. He seemingly was as big on New Rochelle history and Thomas Paine as these Commons users, and as devious in evading copyright and detection. Though that doesn't mean we can delete all photos by these users. A few of them are fairly licensed, like File:New Rochelle land purchase 1688 02.jpg.--ɱ (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thx for opinion. Did you check the tons of copyvios detected yesterday and stored at User talk:HRT2013 and did you also check my update at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HRT2013 (only a few findings)? If a user presents enough criminal energy in uploading several copyrighted images in a systematic way (including use of eventual socks), COM:PRP applies because there are no more grounds and faith availabe to differ between supposed "own works" and works grabbed from other copyright holders. Gunnex (talk) 17:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Open Plaques donated images

Hi Gunnex, I put a comment on the thread https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jnicho02#email_to_the_licencing_team I don't know how the talk should work on Wikimedia...will it have alerted you? Jnicho02 (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The talk should continue on the talk page where the thread was started (to avoid to switch talk pages back and forth), so: thx for alerting me. Your talk page is on my watchlist but currently I am out of office editing at Commons only "on the fly". I will check it later. Btw, you may also use {{Talkback}}. Gunnex (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens eliminadas

Olá Gunnex, tive algumas imagens eliminadas e só agora tomei conhecimento. Não tenho vindo ao Commons com frequência. Quanto ao Aviso de eliminação de ficheiro em minha [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jurema_Oliveira PD;, as fotos das esculturas do Carybé são de minha autoria e recortadas para colocar aqui, mas já foram colocadas outras do mesmo trabalho feitas por outro editor. Estou encontrando problemas com as fotos do Batuque de 1 a 8 que foram fornecidas por um editor do Rio Grande do Sul com autorização em 2004, não me lembro mais onde está essa autorização, mas foi enviada ao Commons. Poderia verificar esses eliminações pra mim? Um abraço JMGM (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Não posso verficar o histórico das imagens eliminadas. Em relação às fotos de Carybé, ver a justificativa de eliminação na página Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sculpture Carybé. Os ficheiros File:Batuque1.jpeg, File:Batuque2.jpeg (...) File:Batuque8.jpeg foram apagados por serem publicados sem permissão do autor original (aparentemente sem ou com OTRS ticket insuficiente). Gunnex (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flipper d'Elle

Hi Gunnex, I am aware that the file File:Flipper d'Elle & Laurent Goffinet Aachen 2006.jpg has a copyright status problem etc.. However I have given you the source I had and the website where I have found it. I know this file is a file that has been used many times on magazines regarding the reproduction of the stallion. Kelly Lawson23 (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The source says: "(C) France-Haras - Tous droits réservés" = All rights reserved = incompatible with COM:L. Permission from "France-Haras" via COM:OTRS needed. Gunnex (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not true

  • Those images where upload with agreement from the author, and the author is even named, which would be impossible to know from website links. The authorization from the author was redirected to an email from wikimedia (the OTRS-team). As such, all those picture where upload with full knowledge from the author who released it to the given commons licence. As such, if the database is preserved, it is there. A better organization from Wikipedia is needed to avoid talking about this over and over. --PedroPVZ (talk) 23:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Related: File:Tricana norte grupo lead.jpg (and other files). Apparantly no OTRS-ticket was received and/or processed by COM:OTRS team which would have (after checking the correspondance with the copyright owner) issued an OTRS-ticket and would have tagged the file accordingly. Instead of this, you just have reverted my tag. So, the question is. Do you have an OTRS-ticket for files coming from http://www.cm-pvarzim.pt? Gunnex (talk) 23:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As time passes, I delete old emails. I can ask them for a new permission. But the best is to search the database in OTRS better, with emails coming from me. Because I remember very well sending them an email, because before that, I got picture deleted with full permission, because there was no ticket (at the time, there was no OTRS team!) Since then, I got in touch with OTRS and they replied with a number, but I cant recall which. It is too far back in time. We are in 2015!
All these pictures (tricana thing), including this one were in the same package, I asked permission for several picture at the same time, all granted and sent by email for upload in wikipedia. --PedroPVZ (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marinadapovoa.jpg? Apparantly OTRS never received some kind of permission for the related files... Gunnex (talk) 23:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
it is from an older permission, as I stated above, as far as I know there was no OTRS-team back then! Before this last one. I contacted them more than once. --PedroPVZ (talk) 23:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I stated, instead of file-search, the best is to search a ticket granted to me. That ticket was to several images, not just one. --PedroPVZ (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS was created in 09.2006 but all related files were uploaded +2012. Please provide more details at COM:ON#OTRS cm-pvarzim.pt. Gunnex (talk) 00:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the best may be asking for new permission again... as I cant help much more. --PedroPVZ (talk) 00:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lot of notifications

Hi, Gunnex

I've received a lot of notifications from you on my Talk page. It seems like your doing some maintenance. That's nice. Please, proceed in the way you consider you have to do but please stop posting notification after notification on my talk page. I know that is a good way to inform others about what is about to happen with their contributions but I'm not really interested in discussing anything on any image. Some of those pictures are really mine meanwhile you're right with some others but I'm not interested in talking about whether you should keep them o delete them. If the community does not consider they must be here, proceed. I received several e-mail notifications with every post and that is turning a little bit annoying for me when the notification is about the very same matter once and again. Keep doing what you are doing and do what you think you have to do. I trust you are doing it for well.

Thank you. Best, --Fhaidel (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Apart from a disgusting impression how copyrights are treated by you, you may avoid further "a little bit annoying" messages by simply indicating for me the files uploaded by you as "own work" which are not your own works. This would end in only 2 further messages for all critical files. Do we have a deal? Gunnex (talk) 23:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sistar Soyou.jpg

Hi,

"(scroll to the last photo, small BY icon on the right)"

I'm sorry but I don't see any CC icon on this page, where do you see it? Not all tistory blogs or pages are CC-licensed, users can choose the license. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE SO IGNORANT...

...so ignorant, that you simply follow idiiotic ideas launched by other "superior minds" here.... Copyriggt violations??? Has the US flag any copyrights on it? The seal of Boston, Massachussets, Manitoba, Zurich, Beijing....any of these have copyrights on it????

These are PUBLIC SYMBOLS OF BRAZILIAN MUNICIPALITIES. Everyone are invited to reproduce them. They are PUBLIC. P - U - B - L - I - C !

The seal of Dili have some TWO HUNDRED YEARS. It's available to everyone, all you have to do is to go to a supplier, and ask for the stamp celebrating the 200 years of the city of Dili, issued in 1969.

The historical coat of arms of Porto Calvo, Sirinhaem and Igarassu are even older, created by mid XVII century! Just google the originals of FRANS POST and JAN BROSTERHUISEN!

I'm really sick and tired of all this lack of interest in real research and ignorant hunt of everything I post here! It's completely the opposite of Wikipedia's supposed "mission"!!!

I MADE THE DRAWINGS, THEY ARE PUBLIC, FREE OF COPYRIGHT. STOP THIS HARASSMENT!


Emerson Santiago Silva— Preceding unsigned comment added by SEMERSONS (talk • contribs)

Pode me ajudar em relação ao usuário acima? Ele não para de carregar brasões sem a devida licença de uso. Chronus (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Usuário atualmente bloqueado por 3 dias. Gunnex (talk) 23:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Objections to images uploaded by pangapilot

I have written to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org but I repeat it here. All the images you have objected to are my copyright. The confusion arose because I have 3 aliases on flickr.com from the time that flickr limited accounts to 200 Mb. They are: Rafferty Fazakerly, Sean Hare and Ernest Denim. All photos uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with cross-references to any of those flickr.com user names are my copyright. I took the photos in question. Please cancel your objections and if any images have been removed, please restore them. I am simply trying to improve the articles I uploaded. Thank you Pangapilot (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thx for your comment. Please use only Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pangapilot for any counter-arguing (not here). Gunnex (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temuco Collage

Dear User Gunnex,

The image used in the collage of Temuco city is for public utility, back extracted from the website of the city [[2]]. I do not think that the use of public images it is prohibited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavero.H (talk • contribs)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ciudad de Temuco.png. Gunnex (talk) 06:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gunnex,
I appreciate your concern over the fact that I might have violated the copyright rules established by your website.
However, It should be mentioned that none of the pictures displayed on the page regarding Annapolis Valley Regional Library do violate the copyright rules. It should be recalled that all of them are:

  1. available for everyone on the official website of AVRL or
  2. made personally by me.


Under sub-paragraph 1, the following items:

  • Windsor Regional Library.jpg
  • Isabel & Roy Jodrey Memorial Library.jpg
  • Dr. Frank W. Morse Memorial Library.jpg
  • Annapolis Royal Library.jpg
  • Berwick Library.jpg
  • AVRL Bookmobile.jpg
  • Annapolis Valley Regional Library Logo.png
  • Rosa M. Harvey Middleton & Area Library.jpg
  • Murdoch C. Smith Memorial Library.jpg
  • Bridgetown & Area Library.jpg and
  • Wolfville Memorial Library.jpg

has the permit to be used by any organization or structure.
Under sub-paragraph 2, the following items:

  • Annapolis Valley Regional Library Branches Map.png
  • Kentville Library.jpg and
  • Kingston Library.jpg

were made personally by me what automatically grants them a permit to be used.
With the above-mentioned arguments in view I request your approval on publishing the items discussed.
I am looking forward to seeing your understanding and respect.
Please accept the assurances of my highest consideration,
Your faithfully,
iKrasnoff— Preceding unsigned comment added by IKrasnoff (talk • contribs)

Hi! Please use Commons:Undeletion requests to appeal about deletion and request undeletion. I have no access to the deleted versions neither do I am remembering my reasoning for the deletion (which were finally deleted by admin(s)). You may also contact admin Yann. Gunnex (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paan (Banaras wala) for you

 Paan (Banaras wala) for you
Here I have brought Banaras wala Paan for you. If you eat this, it will open your bandh akal ka tala. Paan is a stimulating, psychoactive preparation of betel leaf combined with areca nut and/or cured tobacco. is chewed and finally spat out or swallowed. It has many variation.

You deserve it after the great work of cleaning Category:Images from Wiki Loves Food 2015. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dharmadhyaksha: Thx a lot. Till the end of Commons:Wiki Loves Food (15th June 2015 23.59 IST) I'll take it :-)... to withstand the high percentage of copyvios in the campaign uploads. Gunnex (talk) 11:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Its getting damn good response. I bet if they change the cash price to barnstars, many won't bother slipping in such copyvios. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

´

File:Sabudana khichdi.jpg + File:Rabdi.jpg

Please go ahead and delete the media. The idea of an author having to provide permission even after explicitly mentioning the rights under which the work is to be shared is confusing and defies all logic. --Raveesh Vyas 03:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Raveesh— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raveesh212 (talk • contribs)

I am sorry for the nuisance of this, but although your user name is similar as the Flickr user, we have no way of knowing whether you is actually "Raveesh Vyas" at Flickr. We frequently get people who open accounts in other names in order to upload copyrighted material. Gunnex (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Vargas Llosa

Hi, I see you are worried about my photo of Mario Vargas Llosa. However, four years ago this mather was clarified. I wish you read the comments made in 2011 and the explanations I provided in that moment. The photo is my own work. --Elelch (talk) 14:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean File:Vargas Llosa candidato presidencia del Perú (1990).jpg (uploaded 2010) = screenshotted from (example) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFpbcOxvGj0 (2008, by © Angel Cesar, +/- 00:18 min.)? Gunnex (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frontera Marítima Perú Chile

Hola. Con relación a la imagen cartográfica de la frontera Perú - Chile, en los datos de la propia imagen está explicado la norma que habilita su uso libre. Se trata de un documento oficial del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores del Perú, y de acuerdo al Decreto Legislativo Nº 822 - Ley Sobre el Derecho de Autor, los textos oficiales de carácter legislativo, administrativo o judicial no son objeto de protección de derechos de autor. Tu observación carece de sentido, pues la norma peruana al referirse a "textos oficiales de carácter legislativo, administrativo o judicial" no indica únicamente a lo escrito sino a toda la documentación que forma parte del documento legislativo, administrativo o judicial. No se si serás peruano, pero aquí en el Perú los documentos con valor de leyes o actos administrativos están conformados por texto anexos que pueden ser mapas o cartografía. Por lo tanto, el contenido libre está amparado por el Decreto Legislativo Nº 822 - Ley Sobre el Derecho de Autor. --Elelch (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Converted into Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frontera Marítima Chile - Perú.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re File:Montevideo Montage.jpg

Hi! Above montage, if the file have problems deleted it, no problem!! Mr.Jhosimar (talk) 15:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Ok --> Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montevideo Montage.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Earth Images

Sir, can you please explain why GE images are not permitted on Wiki? As I understand it, GE allows for use of its images as stated here. As far as the watermark issue is concerned, WP:IUP states: Free images should not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits or titles in the image itself or anything else that would hamper their free use. Now, the Google Earth watermark does not hamper the free use of the images, as the images are not being used for commercial purpose. GE itself allows for copying the images. The watermark indeed is used by GE to allow attribution to the image thus copied/used. What I understand from the WP:IUP is that it mean that if an image has been watermarked by the original source so that it SHOULD NOT be used elsewhere or is not altered or redistributed as someone else's work, then that image should not be used. But the GE freely allow its images to be used (as stated in its image policy) anywhere LESS at commercial projects like book, TV etc. Wikipedia is a non-commercial project, so I guess there should not have been an issue. I have also asked this question at Media copyright questions board hereI'll appreciate if you clarify as I am not much savvy of copyright polices. Thanks.--TripWire (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Google Earth: Use of images ="(...) However, you cannot sell these to others, provide them as part of a service, or use them in a commercial product such as a book or TV show without first getting a rights clearance from Google." = commercial use not allowed / previous permission needed = incompatible with COM:L. Gunnex (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, Permission from Google is required in case the images are being used for commercial products like books or TV. Wikipedia is a non-commercial project and I am not selling or making money out of the images. GE Image policy explicitly states that their images can be used for all non-commercial purposes. Please explain.--TripWire (talk) 20:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! --> [3]. All files at Wikimedia Commons must meet the following conditions:
  • Republication and distribution must be allowed.
  • Publication of derivative work must be allowed.
  • Commercial use of the work must be allowed.
  • The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable.
Please read (again) COM:L and en:Wikipedia = "a free-access, free-content Internet encyclopedia". The status of Wikimedia Foundation (the maintainer) is irreleavnt. Any single letter written in Wikipedia may be used for commercial use. And most of the images published at Wikipedia (this depends on local image policy, see e.g. for enwiki: Fair Use) may be used for commercial purposes. Gunnex (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation.--TripWire (talk) 07:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda para aclarar todo

Estimado usuario Gunnex Soy el usuario JMRAFFi He buscado ayuda en todos los campos para aclarar el borrado de mis imagenes y fotografías, tengo muy claro lo de Creative Commons derechos de autor, pero he seguido muchos pasos para comprobarles el uso de las fotografías para algunos artículos y también para comprobarles mis diseños, ya que soy diseñador gráfico, pero nada de lo que hago para comprobarles resulta, quisiera que por favor me ayudara al respecto, porque quiero aclarar el mal entendido. mando unas pruebas de mi trabajo.

[4] [5] [6]

Como podrá ver en las pruebas los diseños los elabore yo para posteriormente hacer las imagenes y así tener el derecho para usarlas también remito las pruebas de Panoramio de las imagenes que se posesionan en Google Earth comprendo lo de las licencias y derechos de autor no e utilizado ninguna copia, ni falsificación, ni fotos que no estén libres de usarse por su licencia, le pido por favor me ayude ya que me he paseado mas de 6 meses en busca de soluciones les mande los correos electrónicos de las personas que me autorizaban a usar unas de sus fotos que no son de mi propiedad les mande el enlace de panoramio donde comparto fotos con otros usuarios, todas estas pruebas las mande hace mucho y no e recibido respuesta alguna, también le mando un enlace de mi negocio propio, donde demuestro que soy Diseñador Gráfico y que yo elaboro los diseños para no incurrir en faltas, es un trabajo muy duro pero lo hago con tal infringir las reglas de Creative Commons, Quedo atento a tu respuesta. --JMRAFFi (talk) 15:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I (more or less) understand what you wrote (I am fluent in Portuguese so Spanish is not so far away...) but — considering User talk:JMRAFFi (tons of copyright violations) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JMRAFFi (2x mass deletion requests) — you uploaded photos (from multiple sources as Flickr/Panoramio/Facebook/blogs/sites etc.) which were NOT taken by you. You declared all these stolen photos as "own work", licensed them under a free license without caring to obtain written permissions from the original photographers. As a consequence, all these works were deleted. Note that all you uploads from your Panoramio account were NOT affected by the deletions. If you have a written permission from a copyright holder allowing you to publish the file under a free license, please read and follow the steps described at COM:OTRS (English) Commons:OTRS/es (Spanish).
Regarding your Facebook examples: these are most likely all derivated works from material, already elaborated and published by others and most likely copyrighted. See for example (for the logo of "Fuerza Naval El Salvador"): https://www.facebook.com/115001475187216/photos/a.149980521689311.28178.115001475187216/116215721732458/?type=3&theater (offical Facebook). If you need further help in Spanish, please use Commons:Café for your questions, because I am not sure if your understand (my) English. Gunnex (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getty Images

Hello, I want to add some of these images at wiki common. First, would that be ok? If yes, what kind of license/permission info should I give while uploading them. Thanks--TripWire (talk) 07:32, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These files are  Not OK for Commons and I hardly believe that the copyright holders would allow a free license. Anyway, you may try it. For this, please follow the steps described at COM:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder how to obtain permissions. Gunnex (talk) 07:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Aloha! Ich habe Deinen Noch-mehr-Libanon-Banknoten-PD-Old-DR Clin um eine Datei erleichtert und dieser Banknote einen eigenen DR verpasst: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Syrian-Old-Pound.jpg. Vlt. kannst Du ja dort auch einen Kommentar abgeben? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion

I wonder if I might have the courtesy of a response to my comments on your deletion of one of my photographs? Many thanks. --Transangst (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons.
In other words: "(...) my photographs (...)" = video screenshot taken from (+/-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJjmbLJ-XTE#t=04m28s, 2014, © by "Peter Cox") --> if that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license. Gunnex (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will certainly do that, but am puzzled as to why you deleted my photo in the first place. I clearly stated it was my copyright during the upload process. Do you intend to make me go through this procedure for all my photos I upload here? If so, I simply won’t bother. --Transangst (talk) 12:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We need a definitive, explicit, written evidence that Commons user Transangst = "Peter Cox". The only way to confirm this is via COM:OTRS. If you are planning to upload further files copyrighted by "Peter Fox" --> tell this OTRS: they may issue a ticket which may cover all related further uploads. Gunnex (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We've got more

It seems like New Rochelle is getting another influx of improperly marked photos. They're all either marked 'own work' and don't have the resolution, EXIF info, or other details to make that actually believable, or they're marked PD-US but have no proof of age. See the list. The PD ones are marked as from New Rochelle's historical society; I might go down there sometime and inquire.--ɱ (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ɱ: ! Reminds me of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yolanda kiss + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LUKERAVI + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HRT2013. Most likely sockpupperty involved. I'll try to check some uploads but it may be necessary to clear all via DR. Gunnex (talk) 16:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Next sock most likely Propityenvie (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 17:04, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
--> Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Propityenvie. Gunnex (talk) 17:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
+1 = Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MilkNonTolerant
+1 = User talk:Myriad2015
Gunnex (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I agree that those are all the same person. Thank you for doing all of this. I currently live moderately close to New Rochelle, so I actually want to get to the bottom of this. Clearly someone wants these photos up so badly they're willing to repeatedly ignore Commons and copyright rules.--ɱ (talk) 22:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi, Would you mind looking after Skith (talk · contribs)'s uploads with your expert's eye? ;o) I suspect all his/her uploads are copyvios, but I can't find the source. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I tagged 3 more files grabbed from Panoramio. For the rest (some files appear to be video screenshots) I did a quick search without success, but — considering the "whole program" stored at User talk:Skith — (per COM:PRP) most likely a waste of time = [7]. Gunnex (talk) 22:48, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aclarar todo imágenes de Jackie Saad Robinson

Hola, Gunnex, soy el usuario prmih. Quisiera aclarar el borrado de mis imágenes en mi página de Jackie Saad Robinson. Primero comentarte que yo soy Jackie Saad Robinson, el diseñador y productor de moda del que se describe en el artículo, muy conocido en Colombia. El correo que estoy usando para este usuario es pr@madeinheavenproductions.com y pertenece a mi empresa Made In Heaven Productions. Muchas de las imágenes que he subido son totalmente mías, tomadas por mí o que tienen mis derechos, ya que el de evento de Hernán Zajar que reportaste, lo organicé yo. La fotografía en mi perfil, es mía, soy yo. Fue tomada en Bogotá y está en mi facebook, que es lo que me indigna. Las fotografías que reportaste como violación de derechos de autor fueron tomadas de mi Facebook y de mi Flicker. Son mías, soy yo. Están totalmente libres de violación de derechos de autor porque en ellas salgo yo.

Quisiera aclarar este tema porque me tiene muy preocupado, ya que no he podido subir ninguna foto mía porque siempre le encuentran algún problema. Por favor, si no es inconveniente, me gustaría que me recomendaras cómo subir una foto y darles los respectivos derechos, aunque la fotografía sea mía. Te lo agradezco mucho. Saludos— Preceding unsigned comment added by Prmih (talk • contribs)

Hi Prmih! I understand Spanish but I can't write in Spanish - and I don't know if you understand English. I am sorry for the nuisance of this, but we have no way of knowing whether User:Prmih is actually "Jackie Saad Robinson". We frequently get people who open accounts in notable persons names in order to upload copyrighted material. So, unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming all these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons. All files you uploaded were already previously published on several copyrighted pages.
"Primero comentarte que yo soy Jackie Saad Robinson (...)" --> if that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holder has given permission to publish the file under a free license. If everything checks out, they will restore the file. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license.
You may also post your questions at Commons:Café que "se utiliza para las discusiones de las operaciones, asuntos técnicos, y políticas de Commons." Gunnex (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografía JSaadP.jpg

Hola, Gunnex. No sé por qué marcas la fotografía File:JSaadP.jpg como posible violación de derechos de autor cuando yo especifiqué allí de dónde se había tomado (fuente: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/designer-jackie-saad-arrives-for-the-preview-of-the-grammy-news-photo/77182743 ) y di el debido reconocimiento al autor, que es AFP / Valerie Macon. No entiendo cuál es el problema. Intento subir fotos a mi nombre y están mal e intento subir fotos donde doy crédito al autor y también está mal. ¿Qué debo hacer? Pendiente a tu respuesta.--Prmih (talk) 16:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read urgently Commons:Sobre las licencias. This photo is copyrighted by AFP PHOTO/Valerie Macon, © 1999-2015 Getty Images. All rights reserved. Wikimedia Commons sólo acepta contenido libre. Gunnex (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Y si tomo una fotografía de su facebook y le doy créditos incluyendo el link y el autor? sería válido?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Prmih (talk • contribs)
No. Gunnex (talk) 17:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signature button provides no link to my user/talk page !

Hi Gunnex ! Thank you for your message concerning my edit. There must be a problem with my signature because when I click on "signature and timestamp" my name and date appear but it provides no link to my user/talk page. Who could check and repair the link ? Otherwise I should enter every sign manually ! Thanks in advance.--Cquoi 07:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I have just repaired the broken link in my preferences where my signature was treated as plain text ! Now everything is OK. Thanks a lot for your remark. Regards --Cquoi (talk) 07:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit conflict]:Hi! Did you check your Special:Preferences? You may disable the "X" for wikitext in the section "Signature" (well, that's my configuration). See also Commons:Signatures.... oh, okay, fine :-) Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help again

Hi, It's me again. ;oD I find Lzy881114 (talk · contribs)'s contributions highly suspicious (many different cameras, etc.), but I can't find the source. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. I expected some counter-arguing by uploader (who shows also some recent activity at enwiki) but I am planning a mass DR in the next days anyway. Gunnex (talk) 05:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --> Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lzy881114. Gunnex (talk) 11:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esculturas Palacio Real. MCyP.jpeg

This image is my own work. There is no problem with any international neither local laws, with the Commons License. I would like this image to be recovered; otherwise I get discouraged to offer my free work and time to the Wikipedia project, if every photo I put is questioned as my own work, which of course always is, and would be. Please, recover it!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonet 86 (talk • contribs)

Hi! This file was deleted in 2013 because "without a source". I can't see deleted images so please use COM:UNDEL. Gunnex (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda

Olá gunnex, tudo bem? necessito de tua ajuda para esta categoria Category:Carmo, Ela havia sido usada para a cidade mas, descobri que pode se referir a muitas coisas. Criei a categoria mais de acordo com a wikipt Category:Carmo (Rio de Janeiro) e transformei esta em uma desambiguação. Se puderes acrescentar outras opções agradeceria.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado, vi que tem na itália algumas coisas relativas também. Quando tiver tempo vou pesquisar e acrescentar.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
-

Novamente vou necessitar de tua ajuda em uma página de desambiguação Category:Canela. Fiz uma completa modificação na cidade de Canela para adaptar ao mesmo nome da wikipt e restou este trabalho. Como meus conhecimentos de ingles não são muito bons, peço que de uma ajustada na página. Desde já, grato pela atenção.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 01:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Gunnex (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 11:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arimaa icon set

Hi. I'm a little confused as to why you tagged the Arimaa icon set for deletion. The source given has clear permission: So, enough of the analysis: here are 2 zips of the pieces in SVG format, one set of traditional silver vs. gold, and one set of black vs. white. I’m releasing these under a CC-BY license, mostly because if someone does make a commercial client/book/whatever, then I want them to at least have the option of using my icons. Is there something I missed? ~★ pikolas [[mia diskuto]] 13:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Quite hard to find, the extra license in the middle of the text (it had been pointed out by you), but I corrected all files with (example) this edit. I did not checked them all but they are all similar (only colors changed). For these cases (taken files from external sites which are not covered by existing templates, like {{Agência Brasil}}) please use {{LicenseReview}} for verifying the copyright status. The license check is done by trusted users = license reviewers. Details: COM:LR. Gunnex (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permissão do File:Salto Grande - Foto do Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek na inaugaração da Usina.jpg

Foi adicionada a origem do arquivo acima, não colocando a origem (fonte) antes, pois achei não necessário, já que tal imagem provém do meu acervo pessoal de imagens. Espero que que seja o suficiente. Desde já, obrigado.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Murilo77lf (talk • contribs)

Não. "tal imagem provém do meu acervo pessoal de imagens". "Possuir fotos" não significa que você é também dono dos direitos autorais. Também não é "trabalho próprio" porque não tirou esta foto (ver também User talk:Murilo77lf + sock User talk:Murilo12LF (bloqueado)). Para a foto os direitos autorais vencem passados 70 anos da data de falecimento do autor ou per {{PD-Brazil-media}} = setenta anos, a contar de 1° de janeiro do ano subsequente ao de sua divulgação = (presumindo uma divulgação em 1959) protegido pelo menos até o final de 2029. Gunnex (talk) 07:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Gunnex, adicionei a permissão certa aos arquivos abaixo. Se tiver algum erro, por favor me ajude a corrigi-lo. Desde já, obrigado.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Murilo77lf (talk • contribs)

Todas estas imagens não estão em domínio público. Ver explicação acima. Gunnex (talk) 06:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
With thanks for all the work . Herby talk thyme 08:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex

Meus envios são próprios, para ajudar a Wikipedia, não exclua, Obrigado!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naner Wikipedista (talk • contribs)

LOL... Gunnex (talk) 20:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramkot Fort, Mirpur Azad Kashmir.jpg

With ref to via https://www.flickr.com/photos/47695057@N04/10391760473 is social networking site and i think it`s contents can be shared in any social networking sites journals, newspapers witout infringement of copyrights as already being shared in different forums. Please look into it and remove the last warning tag for copyright ingringement. Wikibaba1977 (talk) 17:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.
  1. At the above Flickr source states "© All rights reserved". Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content. Please read COM:L.
  2. Uploaded by you under false claim of authorship/license/etc. because this is not your work. It is a work by "RasheedFR"
  3. Most of the content shared on any social networking sites is copyrighted.
  4. Recommended lecture: Commons:First steps
Gunnex (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salto Grande - Rua Prudente de Morais - Antiga.jpg

Ola, Gunnex. Foi corretamente adicionada a fonte e o autor da imagem acima. Achei-a no site da fonte. Desde já agradeço.Murilo77lf (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murilo77lf (talk • contribs) [reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gunnex/Archive_8&oldid=173847552"