User talk:Jnicho02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jnicho02!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aberdeen Plaques

[edit]

Jez, you may find this spreadsheet useful. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15wa1laK0uCzWZdF9YCylMeO9mwfp-_1_Q5mUCjASB0c/edit?usp=sharing

Ian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watty62 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emily Davison plaque.tiff. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Gunnex (talk) 09:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emily Davison plaque Epsom.tiff. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Gunnex (talk) 09:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

email to the licencing team

[edit]

I've sent the following email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Hi,

Re: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emily_Davison_plaque.tiff and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emily_Davison_plaque_Epsom.tiff

I am the lead developer on an open source project Open Plaques http://openplaques.org/ We are the worldwide database of commemorative plaques.

The project enables users create plaque/marker records on our system and to collect Creative Commons licenced images on other platforms (which we then link to). This was originally via Flickr, but after talking to Wikimedian @pigsonthewing we ask our users to donate direct to Wikimedia Commons.

Occasionally, a user is not technically able enough to upload images themselves (I know, it is quite simple, but some people just get scared). In this case we ask them to email us the image and state that they are happy to 'donate it for anyone in the World to use under a Creative Commons licence'. I then upload them via my personal account https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Jnicho02&ilshowall=1

I have roughly 350 images donated in this way, all marked as 'Open Plaques donation'. I'm not sure that I want to go through the email trails for all 350 and justify them all.

Is there any way that Open Plaques donations can be seen as an acceptable reference?

Regards, Jez (from the Open Plaques team)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnicho02 (talk • contribs)

Hi Jnicho02! I understand and my tagging was somehow a little exaggerated. Nevertheless you should add all details available to the file information as I did it now for (e.g.) File:Emily Davison plaque.tiff via this edit = (essential) adding the source, the location, the original license as stated at http://openplaques.org + the template {{LicenseReview}} which will initite a human license review by trusted Commons user, confirming the license as stated at http://openplaques.org. With this, you need not to "to go through the email trails for all 350 and justify them all.". Well, try to keep this as routine for future uploads.
"Is there any way that Open Plaques donations can be seen as an acceptable reference?" Well, we could create an OTRS confirmed license template but at http://openplaques.org (so far I could see) multiple licenses are involved which makes it more complicated. If you are planning to upload hundreds of plaques images within a short time we should consider a special solution for this. If not (only uploads from time to time), the above routine would be IMHO sufficient. Gunnex (talk) 07:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I still think there is a minor confusion. Open Plaques only displays open licenced images that are stored on other sites (Flickr, Wikimedia Commons, Geograph). We are donating to Wikimedia Commons any images that are emailed direct to our project. This will be the main and only copy. The image displayed on Open Plaques actually *is* the Wikimedia Commons image (we displayed the wrong licence by mistake).
For example, Alan Haines just emailed me a photo and stated that he was happy for us to upload it to a site that stores photos under a Creative Commons reuse licence. He is the copyright holder. It is not my own work. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brittania_Barracks_Plaque.JPG is now the only copy on the web. I have linked it to http://openplaques.org/plaques/8120 and display the Wikimedia image. Jnicho02 (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jnicho02. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wychling.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wychling.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth O (talk) 18:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Falkner house.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Falkner house.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth O (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!

[edit]

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jnicho02,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jnicho02,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob von Hogflume

[edit]

Hi @Jnicho02, Just wondering where in Sweden this plaque is: File:Jacob Von Hogflume Sweden plaque.jpg. Because I'd like to add it to List of hoax commemorative plaques. Regards, Ridiculopathy (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you click through on the link to OpenPlaques you'll see the location. The photo was sent to me rather than me taking it so I don't know for sure.
I run the OpenPlaques website, so can point out some more for the list if you wish. Jnicho02 (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]