User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive36

Deleted photo

Hello @EugeneZelenko: I am new on wikipedia... Would you please help me? You deleted all the photos I had recently uploaded. The uploaded photos were taken by our in-house photograph and we own the copyright of all of them. Most important we are responsible of the art directions of those specific magazine / books issues. Could you please help me understand. Thank You Qhfofi (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask copyrights holder(s) to send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: thank you for your time! --Qhfofi (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Hi Eugene, you left me a message concerning copyrights about some pictures I uploaded. In my opinion I gave all the tags that are neccessary. I´m pretty new on Wikimedia and don´t understand everything. Would you please help me? Sincerely James von Hassell (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded historical photos and document. Creative Commons licenses are artifact of 21st century. However works may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He you please stop deleting or posting all of my work, I own these posts and take full responsibility for them. The images which are used are for a presentation of our Club to your understanding

----------------------------------------

hey toi s'il te plaît arrête de supprimer ou signaler tout mes travaux, je suis propriétaire de ces post et j'en assume l'entière responsabilité. Les images qui sont utilisées sont pour une présentation de notre Club de votre compréhension ElDado77 (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you owner of club and all its assets including logo? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New logo

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I had recently uploaded a photo on the existing article called Deepa Shree Niraula . Please review it and reply as soon as possible. Thank you! (Fade258 (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hello @EugeneZelenko: ! I just enclosed the officiel logo symbol for [1]. Take your time reviewing the imagery. It's uploaded to [2]. Thank you! (Oujda24 (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Seems to be OK. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photo

Hello! Excuse me, can you explain me, please, why did you delete the photo File:Водка "Аура".jpg. This photo was taken by me, and never been published on the Internet. And one more. Can i download images to wikimedia commons from free photo stocks, like pixabay.com and others? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Олег Сидней (talk • contribs) 11:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works. You are not creator of label on bottle.

Depends on license (please read Commons:Licensing). No in case of Pixabay. See https://pixabay.com/service/license/.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Лицензия а также уточнения авторского права к файлам

Здравствуйте Евгений ! По вашему уведомлению, я отредактировал несколько загруженных файлов, указав на них лицензию а также шаблон об истичении авторского права (по причине глубокой давности их снятия): File:Ilyas Zhansugurov and Maxim Gorky.jpg File:Abdolla Üsenov.jpg File:Kazakhs 19th Century 14.jpg File:Kazakhs 19th Century 12.jpg File:Kazakhs 19th Century 11.jpg File:Zhansugurov family.jpg File:Mustafa Kokebaev.jpg.

Но в редактирование по указанию авторского права к следующим файлам, я затруднился, по причине того что я фактически не могу предоставить разрешение самих авторов данных фотографии по следующим причинам.

В самих источниках отсутвует авторство данных файлов (отсутвуют имена авторов и дата создания/время/год) и то, я предпологаю что, раз уж авторы сами опубликовали данную работу в сайте свободном для общественного доступа. То и они передали ее в пользовании общественного достояния, точно также как и другие авторы сделали это по отношению к своим же файлам.

File:Qobyz.png File:Orteke.jpg File:Asatayak.jpg File:Shanqobyz in a case.jpg File:Shynkildek.jpg File:Shanqobyz 1.jpg File:Tuyaktas 2.jpg File:Tuyaktas 1.jpg File:Narqobyz 1.jpg File:Konyrau.jpg File:Zhelbuaz.jpg

Dimash Kenesbek (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Нет, наличие файлов в Интернете не означает, что с ними можно делать что угодно. Разрешение с отказом от части авторских прав (== свободная лицензия) должна быть указано явно. Смотрите также Commons:Licensing и закон Казахстана об авторском праве. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Флаги Крымской АССР

Добрый день. Пожалуйста переименуйте File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1939).svg в File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).svg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Прахов (talk • contribs) 04:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

А как переименовать уже существующий File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).svg? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Сперва удалить, после переименовать. Прахов (talk) 16:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Сделал запрос на замену этого файла но корректный. При простом удалении информации а файле может быть удалена безвозвратно. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, только запрос на замену этого файла, я не увидел. Это File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).svg вымысел, поэтому информация о файле может быть и не нужна. А эти File:Chelyabinsk COA (Orenburg Governorate) (1782).png, File:Verkhneuralsk COA (Orenburg Governorate) (1782).png, File:Bugulma COA (Samara Governorate) (1782).png переименовать можете? Прахов (talk) 09:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bugulma COA (Samara Governorate) (1782).png, разве не надо удалить? Прахов (talk) 02:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вот этот File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).png, точно нужно удалить. Прахов (talk) 12:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Робот написал, что запрос выполнит, но не выполнил... Похоже, придётся заменять вручную. Остальное сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. Прахов (talk) 14:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вот этот File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1929).png, тоже вымысел, можно удалить. Прахов (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Он используется в двух статьях. На что заменить? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

На File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1929).gif, по источнику [3] Прахов (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. Прахов (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).svg вымысел, можно удалить. После переименуйте File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1939).svg в File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1938).svg. Так будет проще. Прахов (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Как я уже писал, перед этим надо заменить флаг во всех местах, где он используется. Иначе CommonsDelinker удалит все ссылки после удаления. На замену надо время, а его не всегда хватает :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Понял. Прахов (talk) 16:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

В двух статьях en.wikipedia.org, не могу изменить. Прахов (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Изменил там, удалил некорректный файл и переименовал. Почему-то кэш PNG-файлов на сервере не обновился, несмотря на "пинок" (purge), поэтому некоторое время может показывать старый файл. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. Вы мой вопрос выше не заметили. File:Bugulma COA (Samara Governorate) (1782).png, разве не надо удалить? Просто Бугульма вошла в Самарскую губернию в 1850.[4] Прахов (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Это перенаправление. Оно может быть полезно, если кто-то будет смотреть историю статей, гда файл использовался под старым названием. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ясно, спасибо. Прахов (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Коллега, мне думается, что здесь Вас втянули в не совсем корректные действия, без особых обоснований. Было бы неплохо в будущем информировать автора файла, чтобы хотя бы дать ему возможность высказать своё мнение. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Также предлагаю заглянуть на в статью Флаг Крымской АССР, где приведено дословное описание флагов КрАССР в двух Конституциях республики. Там в аббревиатурах РСФСР и АССР точки не пишут. SVG файлы флагов в Category:Flags of the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic созданы в точном соответствии с описанием в Конституциях. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Понятно. В будущем буду выносить подобные вопросы на форум русской Википедии и ожидать итога там. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Status of OgreBot

Hi EugeneZelenko. Just asking if you have received an answer about your continuation of the OgreBot? This project is important to a number of users. Hope you succeed with it. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing discussion is on Commons:Bots/Work requests#Taking over User:OgreBot tasks. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. --Rsteen (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia commons category

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , Please without feeling irritate with me please answer my question. Can I upload a photo which is uploaded by me in This article] to This article .If it is right then How to upload a photo which have been uploaded in This to This category.(Fade258 (talk) 11:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand question. Both files are already on Commons. By the word, you could click on middle mouse button to open file description page without Media Browser, so you will be able to see such details yourself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , see This category and see another category i.e Deepa Shree Niraula which I mention in my first question.(Fade258 (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

All these files are already on Commons. May be you should use regular browser if mobile version is not making things clear? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:6 санта пуденциана Img223.jpg

Этот файл попал на Викисклад случайно. Он может быть удалён. Как и остальные: File:5 санта пуденциана Img221.jpg File:4 санта-пуденциана Img220.jpg File:3 санта-пуденциана Img219.jpg File:2 санта-пуденциана Img218.jpg File:1 санта пуденциана Img217.jpg File:Книга Давидовой 2.jpg

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About file upload wizard

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , Can you tell me why this upload a non-free file were not open.(Fade258 (talk) 06:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Could you please provide a link? Did you use mobile application or regular web browser? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I use Chrome while contributing on Wikipedia.(Fade258 (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Please learn how to copy links there as well as what is syntax for external links in MediaWiki. Otherwise troubleshooting of your problem will not be possible. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before proceeding this which links you are talking. (Fade258 (talk) 14:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Link to upload page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I had uploaded the image of Bhairawaha Gladiators in Wikipedia Commons.Please see this once it is correct or not.(Fade258 (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Looks like you still could not distinguish Commons and English Wikipedia. But this time you choose right place. File seems OK but it must be used in article. Unused non-free media would be deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain in short about First Sentence and Last Sentence.(Fade258 (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

You had uploaded file on English Wikipedia, not Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh sorry for my misunderstanding . From now I clear about English Wikipedia and Commons. Thank you !(Fade258 (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Флаг Казахской АССР

Добрый день. File:Flag of The Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic.svg, тоже вымысел, можно удалить. [5], [6]. Прахов (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. Прахов (talk) 15:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello @EugeneZelenko: , If any person's Residence is America' and his/her Birth place is Canada then which Flag is being used at this time.Please clear my confusion .(Fade258 (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Do you mean usage in some kind of infobox? Usually country(ies) of citizenship is used there as well as in Wikidata. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this were mentioned in Wikiproject:Manual of Style.(Fade258 (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Please provide link. There are many WikiProjects around. By the word, proper syntax for links to Wikipedia from Commons is [[:w:<language code>:<page name>]]. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style This is a link.(Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

You should look on w:en:Template:Infobox person. This template is base for infoboxes about person with narrower scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I see it but if the person has two citizenship then what should we do.(Fade258 (talk) 15:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Both should be stated if both are valid. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, both are valid and those link which you had provided me is not helpful but Thank you for your direction.(Fade258 (talk) 15:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

See w:en:Vladimir Putin (Allegiance) as example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Date Format

Hello EugeneZelenko, I am confused about the use of date format in any references in Wikipedia.For example only, Please look this 1990-01-12 this is correct or this one is correct 12 January 1990. Please tell me which one is correct with reason.(Fade258 (talk) 09:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Do you mean plain text or value of template parameter? Please provide link to template or article where it is used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had changed the date format This is this correct.(Fade258 (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Judging from w:en:Template:Cite web examples, both formats are allowed. Most likely they are converted to same visible format in Lua code. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but most of the Wikipedian suggest to write that format which is done by me.(Fade258 (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

w:en:When in Rome, do as the Romans do :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use

Hello EugeneZelenko, from what resolution does the logo svg image starts to be fair use? --Pewdiepie12321 (talk) 15:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that SVG should be used for non-free media. I don't have exact answer, but something like 300x300 bitmap should be enough. You could see non-free media on English (or other project that allow it) Wikipedia as example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to make 2021 IIHF logo like 2019 how come that be allowed? --Pewdiepie12321 (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must upload this photo in bitmap (preferable in PNG) format to locally project that allow non-free media (for example, English Wikipedia). Commons doesn't allow non-free media. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How long does it take a file to be deleted?

How long does it take a file to be deleted? SparklesonApple (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on problem with file. Obvious copyrights violations are deleted very fast after detection. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted album covers

Hello EugeneZelenko, i uploaded album covers of Aiwa and you deleted them from Commons whereas I have the copyright on these, can you tell me why? What can I do to upload them again without having them deleted? Naufalle Al Wahab (talk) 11:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.18.97.210 (talk) 09:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please send copyrights ownership confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo EugeneZelenko, es geht um meinen Artikel: Bölsche-Teepe; speziell um den abgebildeten Druck jpg/pyramus und thisbe. Ich möchte dich bitten nichts zu löschen. Erstens ist der Artikel noch im Entstehen. Zweitens besitze ich alle Rechte/Lizenzen der Abbildungen, da die Künstlerin meine Mutter war. Drittens wäre ich für eine Hilfestellung der Angabe der Lizenz dankbar. Unter www.boelsche-teepe.de habe ich auch eine homepage mit den Abbildungen von Drucken boelsche-teepe. Ich hoffe auf Antwort. Grüße Jürgen 2003:F0:8718:F9F5:A010:F4F4:B96A:6FC5 22:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know German :-( Could you please be more specific about file(s) in question or log in and sign? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens para exclusão

Olá, Eugene! Você colocou algumas imagens minhas para exclusão sem entrar em contato comigo ou tomar qualquer outra medida. Entendo que a Wikipédia autorize tal medida, mas sou um usuário ativo, que crio e edito artigo, além de que conheço a plataforma. Além das imagens que irei citar abaixo, as duas logos do CEPS, que eu mesmo produzi, simplesmente sumiram - acredito que você tenha feito exclusão imediata.
-
Esclarecendo sobre cada uma das imagens:
File:SteamAwardsLogo.png
Essa imagem já está disponível na Wikipedia Commons em inglês, eu apenas a trouxe para a Commons em Português.
-
File:SerrinhaBra.jpg
File:BandeiradeSerrinhaBA.jpg
Esses são os símbolos municipais da Cidade de Serrinha, no Brasil. Imagens da bandeira e do brasão de armas municipais já eram apresentados no artigo sobre a cidade, mas em má qualidade. Eu decidi, pessoalmente. Logo, além de ser algo sob domínio público, fui eu quem as produzi.
-
File:Antiga logo do CJCC.jpg
File:Atual logo do CJCC.png
Ambos os arquivos estão sob domínio público, produzidos pelo governo do estado da Bahia, no Brasil, e são logos, a atual e antiga, de uma instituição de ensino pública - logo, estão no mesmo patamar que qualquer outro brasão de qualquer outra instituição de ensino.
-
File:Adriano inaugura CEU.png
File:Adriano Lima Campanha.png
Ambas as imagens foram tiradas por mim, a primeira foi em 2020 (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elei%C3%A7%C3%B5es_municipais_no_Brasil_em_2020), durante a campanha para eleições locais no Brasil. A segunda, também produção minha, foi tirada durante a inauguração daquela instituição.
-
Peço, encarecidamente, que revise suas decisões. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmota931 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-(

English Wikipedia allows non-free media, but Commons doesn't. See w:en:File:SteamAwardslogo.png and read Commons:Licensing carefully.

Municipal symbols are obviously not your own work. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country to find out if such symbols in public domain or not.

I don't think that logos of educational institutions are automatically in public domain. After all universities had autonomy for long time.

You could upload photos in original camera resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Copyright status: File:1913-Segismundo-Moret-busto.jpg e seguenti

Ciao, scusa ma non ho capito cosa devo fare: devo applicare una nuova licenza su tutti i miei files? se si, chiedo se non si possa fare in modo automatico da voi amministratori o da me. In alternativa vorrei sapere quale è la licenza giusta prima di correggere uno ad uno tutti i files indicati. Grazie --Albertomos (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( Yes, you need to fix license tags. All these and may be older uploads (I didn't look through all of them) are obviously not your own work and Creative Commons licenses are artifact of 21st century. However they may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it's right these license tags? {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} - after application i can delete your deletion advise? thank you sincerly Albertomos (talk) 16:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not. See my previous reply for explanations and suggestion where to look for proper license tags. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image/file deletion request

Hello, Good evening. I am a collector of old documents for over 15 years. My private archive has many items which I am happy to share, for historical purposes, online with the public. I have been approached by museums and other archives thanking me for sharing the images. May I ask why am I being warned of deleting private images from my collection? how can one prove "copyright" if the item is privately kept? I am worried and alarmed. Thank you, Neil Huddyhuddy (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scanning/photographing document doesn't make you an author, so proper public domain tags must be used. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant countries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

logo Apparel Music

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I had recently uploaded a logo of my label called Apparel Music, mark logo deposited in Italy, please help me if work right ^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djkisk (talk • contribs) 14:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Book covers

Do wikipedia have space to pokemon imagens but do not have space to book covers? Ormandozhiomn (talk) 14:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man you should respect other peoples time. I have a small son to take care. Ormandozhiomn (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some WMF projects (for example, English Wikipedia) allow non-free media, Commons does not.

If you don't have time to learn base principles of project, maybe you should not participate?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should be a better person Ormandozhiomn (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is an elitist dictatorship that spits on poor people of the third world with arrogance and ignorance Ormandozhiomn (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it'll be much better, if you really like to contribute in productive ways, to start from learning basics. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed in productive way. Wikimedia should have a better understand of the need to add a book cover. And the people that say that want to help should help instead of deleting. If it's on the wrong license why not just fix it and say it simple? Shouldn't it be for people? It's been and unfriendly experience being censored so rudely by you. Ormandozhiomn (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no other fix than to upload book covers locally on project that allows non-free media. Again. please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect deletion

Hello, you marked for deletion File:Vinography.Com Homepage.png according to reason F3: Derivative work of non-free content. The site in question, www.vinography.com, is a publicly available blog with no subscription or paywall. What's more, as you can see at the bottom of the site's home page, its content is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license which explicitly allows for its contents to be shared in non-commercial ways. Please reverse this deletion. Gnocchiandwine (talk) 17:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-commercial variants of Creative Commons licenses are not accepted on Commons. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subject Matter

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I hope you were fine there. It's me again with new topic. Please tell me any red appeared title will consider in Infobox.(Fade258 (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Please elaborate. Did you mean you want to use in infobox link to article that doesn't exist yet? I think such links should be temporary: you need to create missing page in reasonable amount of time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For how long it should be placed in infobox.(Fade258 (talk) 14:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

I don't think that there is formal criteria, but I think it's better to add link later then display non-existent one for weeks/months/years. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theophile Bra.jpg

Hello, I have added author information and date to the file File:Theophile Bra.jpg that you recently marked as license problematic. I am sorry I do not know what else I have to do to settle the matter. Yours. --HotaniKG (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to fix license tag: if work is in public domain, relevant tag must be used, not bogus license and own work tags. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I added the ‎ PD-old-100 tag. Yours --HotaniKG (talk) 02:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Color

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , Please see this. In this league article there is a problem of MOS:COLOR which is out of my mind because those color which is used in this league article in the section of Awards and Statistics at Most Runs and Most Wickets doesnot meet the guidelines of MOS:COLOR. I confused because used color were available in this source. Please help me.(Fade258 (talk) 13:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, I'm not very good in such topics. I think you should take a look on other articles about similar topics as well as relevant WikiProjects. Color guidelines may vary. Are there dedicated templates for such tables (for example, w:en:Template:2018 Pakistan Super League points table, style=CricketRR parameter)? If so, try to use them as much as possible. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks ! (Fade258 (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

About non free logo

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , About few days ago I had uploaded the cricket logo for Rupandehi Challengers see this but it has been tagged with orphaned so please tell me what is wrong from me.(Fade258 (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Template tells only about original version of file. Most likely resolution was too high for Wikipedia, so it was replaced by smaller version by bot. You don't need to worry about file, but in future, please upload logos in smaller resolutions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can the first file which is uploaded by me were delete or not ?(Fade258 (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Original version will be deleted by administrator. Regular users could not delete files or their versions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why Delete

Sir why deleted honey bunny ka jholmaal logo isme from wikimedia Commons you have misunderstanding this is not movie poster this is tv series poster please undelete him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beryndey (talk • contribs) 05:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of poster doesn't matter. Please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of your country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Pakistan Super League

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , Please tell me which one is correct. This is right Babar Azam excelled in game 9 leading Karachi to a 7 wicket win over Multan. or This is right Babar Azam excelled in game 9 leading Karachi to a 7 wickets win over Multan.(Fade258 (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, English is not my native tongue. I'm also not interested in sport, so I don't know relevant terminology. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please Reevaluate Copyright Issues for Removed Journal Cover Image Arch.Pharm.gif

Dear Eugene Zelenko,

The removed file "Archiv der Pharmazie.gif" is a low resolution image of a scientific journal cover, and the copyright for it is most likely held by either the publisher Wiley-VCH of the journal, the owner of the journal (a learned society, DPhG), or the contributor (Prof. Dr. Frank Böckler, University of Tübingen, Germany) who worked on the cover depicted. I would be glad to supply their written consent, if necessary. However I found this text in the license section of a similar low resolution scientific journal cover image (see "Angewandte Chemie"):

"It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of magazine covers

   to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question
   with the publication name either visible on the image itself or written in the image description above,

on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia: Non-free content for more information." Note: The image does not depict a person or persons on the cover.

Would it be possible to change the copyright attributed to this thumbnail image accordingly and place the image again in the info box as suggested by the wikipedia style for academic journals?

Best regards Arzneistoff-Wissenschaftler (talk) 07:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload non-free media locally to projects that allow such media (English Wikipedia is one of them), but not on Commons. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rights

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , Can you give me the rights of autoconfirmed and file mover in Wikipedia commons?(Fade258 (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

You should have autoconfirmed status already. Please file request on Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover. How many files do you plan to rename? Maybe Commons:File renaming#How to rename a file would be enough for your purpose? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations User:ArthurCosmic

Hey EugeneZelenko, you've warned User:ArthurCosmic that he'll be blocked if he keeps uploading copyrighted material; He's at it again. Cheers --Andel (talk) 06:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! User was blocked for a week. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request for Files uploaded by Serenityzxc

Hi. I noticed that your the one who closed "Files uploaded by Serenityzxc." I was wanting to remove the categories from the article so that it doesn't show up in the Logos of companies category, but I can't figure out how. Do you know how I might be able to that? Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify which article did you mean. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

concerning your message about deleting a photo

Hi Mr Eugene .. I received your message ending with these words: Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. I uploaded this photo after I found it in that page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abdel_Halim_Hafiz.jpg and I read these lines: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work So .. I thought I can use the photo freely!! help me information! Yours Attaremad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Attaremad (talk • contribs) 22:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is historical photo and Creative Commons license doesn't seem to be correct. It may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbasource Co-Creator zone .jpg

Hello! Excuse me, this photo and the painting in the wall is my work File:Abbasource Co-Creator zone .jpg. This photo was taken by me,and the painting in the wall is by me. Please don' delete it.

Please send copyrights ownership confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:HNK SPLIT FROM CANKAREVA POLJANA.jpg

Hi, what is the problem in this photo? AndreaD'orrio (talk) 17:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works. Actually it was mentioned on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About deletion of a picture

Hi buddy, You recently deleted [File:Dynamo Gaming.jpg] And you have served me a notice for a possible deletion of [File:Aaditya Sawant.jpg]. And you say that these files violate the copyright rules. Well I dont have so much knowledge about this rule. So I request you to please add a picture of Mr. Aaditya Sawant and a picture of his channel's(Dynamo Gaming) official logo which doesn't violate the copyright rules. And please if you think that the page created by me is good then please make it official so that common people can find it on internet. Because I have added all the information after proper searching and best of my knowledge. You may check it from his official channel whose link is provided on the page. I will be very thankful to you.

Regards, EditWiki45 (talk) 10:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aaditya_Sawant.jpg and File:Dynamo_Gaming.jpg EditWiki45 (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Availability of something on Internet doesn't assume license compatible with Commons:Licensing. Please read basic project rules and copyrights law of your country carefully before next upload. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

suppression de l'image Life is strage tout les logos.png

Bonjour, L'image Life is strange tout les logos.png a été suprimé alors que je ne vois pas de probléme consernant le detanteur des droits d'auteur ou une image l'ibre car j'ai seulement pris plusieurs logo pour créer une image, par exemple eux utise des logos life is strange et leurs image n'est pas suprimé: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Life_is_Strange_True_Colors_logo.png.webp https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Life_Is_Strange_Before_the_Storm_Logo.png https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Life_Is_Strange.png

mais je vien de me rendre conte que sa doit étre a cause du logo de life is strange 2 qui est le seul a avoir une licence ce qui est a la fois bizzard et dommage, du coup ma question est si je retire juste le logo life is strange 2 mais que je garde tout les autre c'est bon ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedr0u 0 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Sorry, I think all these logos don not fit {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer, indeed I was wrong about the right to use an image, thank you and good day =)

(sorry I don't speak English, I use google translate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedr0u 0 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request of Täby flag related images

Hi just want to note that am in the process of adding the images to the wiki page of Täby kommun and Täby Municipality. I will finish that sometime later this week. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.57.244.60 (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider to redraw images in w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics format. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi redact my last answer, the file will probably not be used in the near future so I think the beast thing to do for now is as you requested to delete them. But I am new so I don’t know how the deletion procedure, works will the files be deleted automatically now or can I delete them manually? Franz Jonzon (talk) 10:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests are closed by administrators manually not early than 7 days after opening. If you still plan to create article where these images will be used in reasonable amount of time (like in a week), just add comment on deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you

Rupturestriker (talk) 15:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

imagenes de los torneos de la copa interandina

good evening I would like to know in the case of the images I obtained them from the Ecuadorian newspapers El Comercio, El Universo could help me to put in the case of rights even if it is own work to obtain them since they were not obtained by other means such as the internet greetings --Lcdo. jose francisco vargas muñoz (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These photos are obviously not you own work and you could not license them. However they may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icerde.jpg

This poster is useful as non-free image in Wikipedia. Can you move this file to Wikipedia? Regards The Supermind (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could reupload it there yourself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License - explanation, self , PD-Polish

You have bean noticed me about license of file I'd added in the past. So I'll try to explain this situation: Files: • File:OP-11_R._Myśliwiec_i_W._Pikul,_lata_1943_-_1944.png • File:OP-11 Apel z okazji 3 maja 1944 na Myszkowskiem.png • File:OP-11 R. Myśliwiec i W. Pikul, lata 1943 - 1944.png

has source attribute : książka. Łukasz Grzywacz Świtalski "Z walk na Podkarpaciu" PAX 1971. autor : unknown place: Republic of Poland and license tag

This photograph is in the public domain because according to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed to be in the public domain in Poland.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it meets three requirements:

it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days),
it was first published before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice or before 1964 without copyright renewal or before the source country established copyright relations with the United States,
it was in the public domain in its home country (Poland) on the URAA date (1 January 1996).

To uploader: Please provide where and when the image was first published.

As I understand , in order of Polish low , they hasn't copyright protection (first time publications before 1994, no copyrights reserved) - so it is Public Domain.

Files: • File:Akcje OP-11 na mapie obszaru działania.png • File:Akcje OP-11 na mapie rejonu działania.png • File:OP-23 Szlak Bojowy.png • File:Jan Barniak "Wrzos" fragment tablicy nagrobnej.png

I am the author of this graphics or photos. They has license tag

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

Files: • File:Jan Barniak "Wrzos" zdjęcie z wojska.png • File:Jan Barniak "Wrzos", zdjęcie z dyplomu.png • File:Jan Barniak ps. "Wrzos".jpg

I'am an only owner of this pictures. They come from my family collection (analog version) and present my famili mamber which died while fighting against Germany during Second WW. I've digitalize the photo and correct them.

they has license tag

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

So could You please tell me, what is exactly wrong with it?

Yours sincerely Łukasz-Kraków

Are you author of original maps, or you just added diagram over? Please read Commons:Derivative works.

You are owner of physical copies of your family, not copyrights on them. However photos may be in public domain, so proper license tag must be used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I found out where I went wrong. I've changed the licence of the old photos to PD 70, Owner of the copyrights died in 1944 (70 years - protection period in Poland). I've add note that background map comes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/ to the pictures with map. That is ok or I should change the license to ? The momorial board is designed and founded by me and I'm the photo author. The picture on the board is now PD-70 license. So it's OK now I think. Thank for help. Łukasz-Kraków

There are still problems with maps. See deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I am here again to know something. Can i upload the photo which has been downloaded from Facebook by mentioning correct liscence ? Fade258 (talk) 16:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is license statement is explicit and license is compatible with Commons:Licensing? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I've already sent email to affirm that I represent copyright holder to upload the file. --Nutthoney (talk) 08:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Nutthoney[reply]

Such permissions must be sent by legal department or head of organization. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Bonjour, je suis désolé, mais je ne comprends pas comment remédier à l'éventuel suppression de mes fichiers... Il m'est impossible de répondre à des dizaines de messages. Cordialement --Foscolo (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know French :-( You need to fix license tags. All historical works are obviously not your own work and Creative Commons licenses are artifact of 21st century. However they may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding deleted file

Greetings. I would like to understand the reason for deleting https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HSE_COVID-19_vaccine_Pfizer_information_booklet,_July_2021.jpg. The information booklet is given for free to the public for their personal use. It is a work of the government. Please see https://data.gov.ie/pages/re-useofpublicsectorinformation. Ear-phone (talk) 23:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This applies to particular government site. You should investigate situation with booklet in question. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I do not understand what you mean because the information is not only related to a particular government site. The vaccine information booklet was produced by a government public sector organisation and was made free to the public. Among other aspects, the link mentions, "Did you know that you have the right to re-use information which public bodies hold, under the European Communities (Re-use of Public Sector Information) Regulations 2005?" In short, the information booklet was funded by the public via taxes. I urge you to re-consider your deletion. Ear-phone (talk) 11:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is written on information booklet itself? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The logos of the government departments, e.g. the publisher Health Service Executive are there, along with the date (which were shown on the deleted image). There is no copyright notice or prohibition of re-use. It says more information can be found and downloaded from e.g. https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/newsfeatures/covid19-updates/covid-19-vaccine-materials/covid-19-vaccine-patient-information.html Ear-phone (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have answered your question(s) with links to the relevant legislation. It is unambiguously clear that re-use is permitted since it is a work of the government. As already stated "There is no copyright notice or prohibition of re-use." in the information booklet. Also please see S.I. No. 525/2015 - European Communities (Re-use of Public Sector Information) (Amendment) Regulations 2015. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/si/525/made/en/print Ear-phone (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was not convinced by your arguments. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are not my arguments, but stipulations of the law. Are you going to reverse the deletion? Ear-phone (talk) 00:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please find original booklet and upload it, if license is compatible with Commons:Licensing. It'll be much more usable than photo of its cover. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are now your own rules. As indicated by law, members of the public have a right to re-use information which public bodies hold...I have quoted the relevant piece of legislation. I am free to take a photo of any page I like, not the ones you dictate to me or those which meet your personal rules. Ear-phone (talk) 19:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let stop this discussion, because arguments are repeated. Anyway, you violated original license (whatever if was) by claiming own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is my own work. According to law, I can re-use the work even for economic purposes. Everything I did is supported by legislation. (A related example - if I take a photo of a public building, under freedom of panorama, the photo is my own work. By no means does that mean I am claiming the building is mine.) Ear-phone (talk) 21:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works carefully. Freedom of panorama is not applicable for temporary displays. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was giving the example of Freedom of Panaroma as an example which can perhaps be more easily understood. Anyhow please read the actual law carefully: "The HSE is subject to the Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations, available at data.gov.ie ( https://data.gov.ie/pages/re-useofpublicsectorinformation)" - to quote the legislation "Open data policies which encourage the wide availability and re-use of public sector information for private or commercial purposes, with minimal or no legal, technical or financial constraints, and which promote the circulation of information not only for economic operators but primarily for the public, can play an important role in promoting social engagement, and kick-start and promote the development of new services based on novel ways to combine and make use of such information." https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.172.01.0056.01.ENG. Ear-phone (talk) 11:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lets stop this discussion: repeating arguments is useless. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Message to Stevebradley1

Look, loser! Another user already notified me about this petty violation of posting this very low-budget, very basic logo that came straight from the website of a TV station that can barely afford to keep their signal turned on. I spoke with the owner and had already warned him about all the know-it-all’s that lurk this site who work for free and get their rocks off by removing and editing people’s contributions and that they may remove his logo. I don’t need to be told about it again. So, please, move on, find a paying job where you can feel important, and take your drama to someone else’s page.

Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bibix1996

They are back to uploading their copyrighted Apple images after the final warning you gave them. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! User was blocked for week. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:56, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

El.makedoner

Hi, thanks for leaving OTRS permission on his talkpage. I suspect that listed images are from his Instagram account, but I don't have IG and don't want to make an account. Could you check his posts? Maybe they are copied from there. Thanks, A09090091 (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User is subject of these photos and 3rd-party photographer(s) is involved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Gascogneverite (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)== alfred sabail et suivant ==[reply]

Uploads by Gascogneverite

Bonjour,

je ne comprends pas la demande de suppression. La photo vient d'un travail personnel et j'ai toutes les autorisations, il n y a aucun problème de copyright. Pouvez-vous m'indiquer ce que l'on doit indiquer ? merci d'avance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gascogneverite (talk • contribs) 15:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know French :-( You uploaded historical photos and painting. You could not claim authorship over them. However works may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ilcultoredarte

Dear Eugene Zelenko,

All the photos of Antonino Sartini's paintings were taken from the site: antoninosartini.altervista.org. All the contents of this site, namely antoninosartini.altervista.org, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (see the page https://antoninosartini.altervista.org/copyright/). All other photos uploaded derive from paintings or letters owned by me. Could you please help me to add this information to the photos I uploaded? Furthermore, the photos of the paintings such as Boldini, Bertelli and Ciardi are works in the public domain as they are works of painters who have died for more than 70 years. I started editing the files, but I'm waiting for your response, so as not to make mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilcultoredarte (talk • contribs) 16:15, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Cordial greetings --Ilcultoredarte (talk) 15:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antonino Sartini died in 1954 and obviously could not license his works with Creative Commons licenses. Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies) to find out if his works in public domain or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene Zelenko, I have finished modifying the information and licenses of the paintings by Boldini, Ciardi, Giovanni Secchi and Flavio Bertelli, all painters who have died for more than 70 years and therefore their works are in the public domain. Is that okay or do I need to make further changes? I have not modified the photos of Sartini's paintings. I need more information. Now, the author of the site where I took the photos of Sartini's paintings (https://antoninosartini.altervista.org) is also the owner of the paintings and I know him and he gives permission to publish them also on Wikipedia. Do I have to get a written document by him? Cordial greetings--Ilcultoredarte (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could use template based on {{Creator}} and Wikidata item for information about artist and his/her dates of life.

I don't think that creator of this site creates new copyrights. Photographer should be mentioned in description, but copyrights status is based on original artist. See also w:en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp..

EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene Zelenko, I do not understand. What exactly should I do to keep the photos of Antonino Sartini's paintings? Or have you decided to delete them? In any case, there are 3 years left for them to become public domain photos, because Sartini died in 1954. This person who owns Sartini's paintings has given me permission to publish the photos of Sartini's paintings on wikipedia. Do you want me to give you this permission? He is the legitimate owner of these paintings. Cordial greetings--Ilcultoredarte (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Owning physical copies doesn't assume owning copyrights. Photos could be undeleted when Antonino Sartini works will become public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking you a favor, since there are less than 3 years to reach the 70th anniversary of Sartini's death, I would ask you not to delete them from the databases, but only to hide them from internauts. Cordial greetings.--Ilcultoredarte (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who is/are Antonino Sartini's heir(s)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene Zelenko, the painter never married and had no children. I know that Sartini had sisters and a brother, some of whom have not married. Obviously all of Sartini's closest relatives died. At present I only know who owns Sartini's paintings. In any case, exhibitions on Sartini have been held in Italy for many years without anyone ever protesting. If there are relatives, they will be the sons of the sons of Sartini's sisters, but although I am a lover and have followed Sartini's exhibitions, I have never had the honor of knowing directly any of his relatives, if they exist and they are interested in him. Cordial greetings.--Ilcultoredarte (talk) 11:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights are inherited like other property. Please read details in relevant country copyrights law. If current ownership could not be established and permission(s) obtained, files will be deleted. However they could be restored after becoming public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all Sartini's works from Wikipedia, they remain only on wikimedia commons. If the photos of Sartini's paintings have to be deleted, do I no longer have to indicate who was the author of the works? Cordial greetings.--Ilcultoredarte (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated all files for deletion (so they are listed in single place) and added service category for undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALFRED SABAIL and also

Bonjour,

je vais procéder aux modifications de licence sur tous les fichiers, je vous remercie de bien vouloir ne pas les supprimer.

Cordialement --Gascogneverite (talk) 22:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this when you'll have time. But please keep in mind that week is regular grace period for fixing such problems. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This is a logo owned by the Saudi Liver Patients Charitable Society. It belongs to the Saudi Liver Patients Charitable Society. How can I modify the license, please help..

Sources https://twitter.com/kabidak--محمدالخيواني (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload such logos to projects that allow non-free media. For example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitgliedskarte Amerika Haus München 1991.jpg

Please undelete File:Mitgliedskarte Amerika Haus München 1991.jpg, because it shows a free content, see licence template (PD-US-...). --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tag was {{PD-ineligible}}, what is not true. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files

Hi EugeneZelenko, I hope you are doing well.

I have already improved the files you left to delete in 7 days, Check out, please. [7] --Marium Alberto (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm still not convinced by own work story. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

کمک

Hooman Shams editor (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)باسلام من دو پرونده بارگذاری کردم که در صفحه بحثم موجود است و این بارگذاری اشتباه شده و میخواهم آن را حذف کنم، چون به جای پیش نمایش انتشار را زدم. به هرحال کمکم کنید![reply]

Sorry, I don't know Arabic. Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated uploading same copyright violation image after several warning and deletions

The user Arpis123 has again uploaded File:Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera.jpg (third time in a row) that violates COM:FAIRUSE. The user has been warned several times but they are ignoring. See log. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! Arpis123 was blocked by DMacks. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Truly Nyonya Malacca by Jacky Liew.jpg

Hi, for the File:Truly Nyonya Malacca by Jacky Liew.jpg that you request delete due to it is book cover from www.foodcritic.my, i would like to clarify that I am the author to the book and i able to authorise the book cover for fair use. If you require prove, i may go to the website and snapshot for the backstage of the website, or you need any other evidence, kindly informed. Patricialiew (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Commons doesn't accept fair use content. Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if i myself can authorise the book cover, what license should i choose? Patricialiew (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Choice is yours. w:en:Creative Commons license would be helpful reading, but with Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i will find out, so now i need to reupload or...? Patricialiew (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вандальное фото

Здраствуйте.

Удалите пожалуйста это вандальное фото. --Mykola7 (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за помощь! Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. --Mykola7 (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of templates

Hello EugeneZelenko,

could you check the removal of the templates that you put in August 24, 2021 in files uploaded by Sebas RS: ?

After being removed by Marium Alberto, I replaced them and recreated the category "Media without a source as of 24 August 2021", which had been erased, but have been reverted again by Sebas RS. Marium Alberto and Sebas RS are the same user. Sorry for the inconvenience, thank you and best regards. Macucal (talk) 02:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! I nominated all files for deletion. Please file request on Commons:Requests for checkuser. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matrix 4 Logo.png

Can you please reverse your deletion? The community literally voted to keep this as being below COM:TOO just few weeks ago. Thanks! —Locke Cole • t • c 05:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem the case for person who marked this logo as copyrights violation and for me, so case is less than obvious. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I support Locke Cole's request. This seems to be too simple to have a copyright. Anyway, files with a kept-DR should never be speedy-deleted, so this was deleted out of process. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file was actually marked as copyrights violation twice, so different people have different opinions on too simple claim. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the file and created a proper DR, so that we can have a discussion about that. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

#NoMesswithEugene

Okay i just gotta view that i was made perfect easily. Can i make this next project page of Wikipedia so are you ready? If its fine to me.😏 LorickIsBoyThatStopDeleted (talk) 04:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Logo_FDM which is an image of the public domain

Dear EugeneZelenko, you deleted the image that I have uploaded for the logo of the mathematical federation of CentraleSupélec. This image is completely free of rights as part of the public domain (we explicitly waive all rights). It appears only on the official website (and some websites when the fédération is a sponsor). I'm the webmaster of this official website, and I am also the person in charge of the communication of the mathematical federation.

Could you please undo your deletion? Or explain to me how I can upload this logo in Wikimedia Commons. I have an SVG format or EPS format if it is a preferred format on Wikimedia.

Thank you for your help. Goudenegl (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where confirmation of this could be seen? Anyway, claims of own work in original upload were incorrect. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a new version ([) File:Logo FDM CNRS.svg (]) in a svg format. I have precised on WikiCommons that I was the author, and that the licence is C0. Moreover, to confirm C0 licensing, I write inside the file, in the metadata, some details about the license C0. Finally, I have uploaded this svg file on the official website https://fd-math.pages.centralesupelec.fr/theme/images/fdm.svg . Do you think that it is correctly uploaded and claimed right now ? Thanks again for your work. Goudenegl (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License statement for logo should be on one of official web site pages. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License statement is now available on the Official Website at https://fd-math.pages.centralesupelec.fr/theme/images/LICENSE.html Thank you for your help. Goudenegl (talk) 09:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use this link in {{Information}} in permission field. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Build engine logo.png

Hi EugeneZelenko, you recently deleted File:Build engine logo.png as a non-trivial logo. However, the logo shows nothing more than text and a simple rectangle. Considering that the game engine that this was created for is based in the United States, this seems well within the bounds of COM:TOO US. Can you reconsider the deletion and restore the logo? ✗plicit 13:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Text texture is not trivial. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg was denied registration by the U.S. Copyright Office and File:Sonic-Generations-transparent-bg.png was kept by consensus after two DRs eight years apart. Having a texture does not appear to be sufficient for copyright protection in the U.S. ✗plicit 14:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is copyrights registration is still required? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, but legal and community precedence suggests that this is not copyrighted. At the very least, I think this should be sent to COM:DR for further discussion. ✗plicit 00:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about other countries, for example, Poland, where Cyberpunk 2077 developer resides? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is pixel art. There is no texture. Please stop deleting any logo based on simple elements and text by your judgement alone. I consider this vandalism at this stage. Even when it is undeleted, I have to revert the commons delinker. Matt (talk) 08:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, @EugeneZelenko: your interpretation of COM:TOO appears to be out of line with the rest of the community, so you shouldn't be speedy deleting anything borderline, especially not unilaterally without the files even having been tagged by someone else. In the section above you said, "This file was actually marked as copyrights violation twice, so different people have different opinions on too simple claim." When "different people have different opinions", the image should absolutely not be speedily deleted! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope rest of community will not forget to monitor U. S. Copyright Office activities just to make sure that organization will not change its mind. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding File:Apollo in Real Time - Apollo 11 Descent and Landing.png

First, let me apologize in advance for my ignorance: I know very little about proper Commons editing. Regarding the Apollo in Real Time image, I wrote the Apollo in Real Time article on Wikipedia. I contacted the website developer, Ben Feist, and asked him to upload an image of the dashboard to be used in the article, which he did. I think it's safe to say he knows even less about doing things correctly on Commons than I do. What do we need to do to the file description to indicate that Elconcho (Ben Feist) created the website itself, as well as the screenshot? Schazjmd (talk) 23:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File is not won work. It's screenshot that contain images and text. Sources and licenses for all elements should be clearly indicated in file description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader created the website and took the screenshot of the website. How do we indicate that in the file description? Schazjmd (talk) 14:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, uploader didn't create everything what is shown on web site. Please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican and Mexican American Soldiers in the Korean War photos

Hi Eugene, you left me a message about the copyrights for some pictures I uploaded. I corrected the information that I considered necessary. Could you help me in case it is lacking information or let me know if it is okay? Thank you for your help. Kind regards, BFigueroaF — Preceding unsigned comment added by BFigueroaF (talk • contribs) 01:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean File:Veteranos Guerra Corea 24abr21.jpg and File:Korean war.jpg? Obviously these photos are not your own work. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico, government's works are copyrighted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Eugene

Je hebt al mijn foto's en documenten die genomen en gemaakt zijn door mijn vader en schoonvader op delete gezet, waar ik 7 dagen de tijd heb om dit aan te geven. Nu ik nieuw ben en dit voor het nageslacht op Wikipedia gezet heb, is mijn vraag hoe en waar moet ik in aan link aangegeven dat al deze documenten en foto's in eigen beheer gemaakt zijn en eigendom van zowel mij vader en schoonvader zijn. Aangezien ik nieuw ben op Wikipedia, begrijp ik het wel van het auteursrecht, maar niet hoe ik er voor kan zorgen dat deze op Wikipedia kunnen blijven bestaan met mijn toestemming.

Grt. Hennie Kessens — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torro54 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Dutch :-( Obviously, these images are not your own work. Are you father and father-in-law still alive? If so, please ask them to send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. If not, who is/are their heir(s)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No license tag

Hi, Tagging more than 1,000 files with "no license" is not very useful since these files have a license, which may or may not be valid. It would be better to create small batches of DRs. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All these files had bogus licenses, what technically equal to no license. It may be reasonable to have dedicated process/tagging for historical images tagged as own work or modern licenses. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know what changes the uploader did from the original sources. If significant changes were done, a CC license may be valid. Sorry if I was not clear. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What obviously is not valid is claims of own work and absence of credits for original author (== author right to name). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added the tags and sources

Hello, I've added the copyright tags and the sources of these files:

--Languaeditor (talk) 22:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed {{No license since}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar

danke für die unterstützung. auf sämtlichen eingereichten unterlagen bestehen keine copyrights. die unterlagen sind ohnehin z.t. über 50 jahre alt. der gründer, organisator und administrator des jazz festival zürich ist vor einigen jahren gestorben. ich habe offeriert, die original ranglisten per brief post zu senden, habe aber keine antwort erhalten. ich bin bald 83, meine hoffnung: dass hoffentlich nichts gelöscht wird. danke für bemühungen und vertrauen. charlie schumacher, 06.10.2021 Calzolai (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know German :-( Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. Copyrights usually expired after particular term (70 years in EU) after author death. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

USER GREYMANBY

	USER GREYMANBY
	User Greymanby apologises for sending message in this box; however are unable to find out how to comment on potential deletion of their files proposed since September 2021. And wish to somehow explain their useful purpose on wiki media commons. But it is not clear how to do this! Thank you Sir in the meantime and best wishes.. [Greymanby]. Greymanby (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just edit Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Greymanby which was mentioned in message on your talk page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision deletion

Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста, удалите (скройте) старую версию моего файла File:The C Programming Language.png с опечаткой. --Максим Пе (talk) 12:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Не забудьте, пожалуйста, указать лицензии и источники для всех нетривиальных логотипов. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you a message from Greymanby one time user of wikimedia commons; very dissappointed no longer allowed to contribute, have left a statement on the matter that I hope admin will read; as I believe the decision was very sudden, rash, and to me appeared a little prejudicial in its application. Thank you. Greymanby (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Project scope carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Thank you Mr Zelenko for reading my message [yes its user Greymanby again]

Please bare with me I have made an undelte request for a non sexualised and non explicit video file; yes there were a couple! Namely Globe nude and landscaoe Dance sequences [webm video]. This is not rude in any way it had only a normal nude figure dancing in a lovely field. There is no sexual content in it therefore. It is a short artistic work. In tradition of the nude in art I have made request for undeletion of this video. Please read my request on the appropriate pages. Also a video of twitchy Dunnock bird at a window, and a poppy flower has also gone; is that explicit too?

Thank you Greymanby (talk) 12:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About "PFH.jpg"

The link and author are in the file description. And I couldn't find the copyrights, however I'm asking the author indicated on the site for their authorization. If/When he accepts, who do I send it to? --D4V1D 4GG70 (talk) 22:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find out if work in public domain or not. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rs-nourse, please re-examine

Hi, you seem to have tagged hundreds of images uploaded by User:Rs-nourse "This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing" - and threatened speedy deletion. ALL / 100% of his images are created by this user, and all elements within them, there is no derivative element which needs to be credited to any other author. You have made a wild assumption. Please will you therefore discuss the matter with User:Rs-nourse before you take any further action, which would be deemed reckless, misinformed and highly damaging to the wikipedia project. There are thousands of hours which have gone into this work by User:Rs-nourse which is a great asset to wikimedia, it's all his own work, every bit of it, and he does not need to credit every brushstroke/keystroke/mouse-click, or every quartering within every shield - all produced by him. He states "You have literally marked every file I've ever uploaded" and gave you an explanation, but you do not seem to have engaged with him. Please stop!Lobsterthermidor (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have brought upo this matter at Commons:Village pump, please do not delete any files until this matter has been properly discussed.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image

You deleted File:Baer Mate.jpg without any previous discussion. I remember I took that picture with my camera at my house, so there isn't any copyright violation. Willemarcel (talk) 11:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works. Actually, it was mentioned in message on your talk page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ricard Menor Vilahur.jpg

Hi, EugeneZelenko. The referred file depicts me at https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuari:Gibernauta Please consider your nomination for deletion upon my picture file. This is no "personal album usage", just fulfilling my profile. Thanks for your work Gibernauta (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just mention that this file is used now on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

Olá, não sei se este usuário fala português, mas tenho uma dúvida. Dias atrás fiz um upload de um arquivo no Wikimedia Commons que foi excluído por supostamente violar políticas de privacidade, mesmo esclarecendo que não era minha autoria e especificando a fonte. No momento, desejo realizar outra contribuição: fazer o upload da bandeira do município de Santo Antônio do Descoberto-GO, utilizando como fonte o arquivo presente no site da câmara do município, porém não sei se acontecerá o mesmo. Peço que me oriente para que não ocorra o mesmo novamente. Spacemadman (talk) 18:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-( Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country to find out if such symbol in public domain or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: You may be blocked soon

Hello. I didn't know much about licensing a while ago, but now I get it and have noticed that there are several files that I uploaded that are infringing on copyrights. I wonder: if I request the deletion of the files, will I still be prone to being blocked from Commons? PS: I use Google Translate and some phrases may take it very literally. Thank you. --Sebaspikyaq (talk) 23:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's not trivial to find file in question (is it old or recent upload), but please be more careful in future. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battle of - schlacht von leva - levice.jpg

opposite to what you say the image is equiped with a license: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_L%C3%A9va#/media/File:Battle_of_-_schlacht_von_leva_-_levice.jpg

i had the original print from 350 years ago and photographed it for the sake of wiki, but the rest seems too complicated for me. I am not even shure if that is the correct way to answer your threat of deleting it.

but delete it if you have to - or fill in what is needed, I can't, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddy felsen (talk • contribs) 16:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Making photo doesn't make you author of original work. If drawing in public domain, you need to fix license tag accordingly. However, you could mention in description that you photographed original. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buffalo Wild Wings (logo, vertical).svg

Hi Eugene:

I noticed you deleted the file in question. However, the DR is still open. Should I go ahead and close it if no further action is needed? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing to problem! I closed deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pagina Berta Autotrasporti

Hi, i have seen Your message, what have I to do ? Thank you --151.36.125.180 16:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you only heir or there are other heirs? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Please delete the following files as now I could find the original sources of the images as Facebook, Instagram and IMDb. I have re-tagged them as COM:CV along with the links. They are as follows:

Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help!

Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/Arian.fth

Hi Please delete all the files uploadede by this user and block the account. all of them are copy right violation. all were taken from google image. thanks[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 07:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! I nominated all uploads for deletion. It'll be helpful if you'll use {{Copyvio}} and specify sources of images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Нужна свободная фотография

Евгений, добрый день. Я перевожу статью о школе права Линкольна в Сан-Хосе (en:Lincoln Law School of San Jose) и очень хотелось бы добавить в статью фотографию здания этого учебного заведения, расположенного по адресу 384 S Second Street, San Jose, CA 95113. В интернете свободных фотографий я не нашёл, есть только несвободные. Я увидел, что Вы в своё время загрузили в Commons много фотографий зданий с соседней улицы. Не могли бы Вы помочь с фотографией здания Lincoln Law School of San Jose? Спасибо. --Voyagerim (talk) 01:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Здание расположено не слишком удачно - много деревьев и, возможно, тени от окружающих высоких строений. Надо снимать с большой выдержкой, что трудно на оживлённой (во всяком случае, в прошлом) улице. Да и вирус не способствует - не хотелось бы в толпу попасть. Может быть, в будущем. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Благодарю за ответ! Буду ждать, спасибо! --Voyagerim (talk) 06:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

missing source description

Dear Eugene, I recently uploaded a grafic. On my site you told me that this grafic needs to mention the source I used. I used a physical ear-model from a company and so I added the name and address of that company. But I am not sure if I did it in the correct way - so please check.
In addition I used the Wikimedia OTRS release generator to create a proper licence agreement and sent it to the "Legal & Compliance" department of that company, but the answer is pending. If I receive a positive answer I will contact you again for further assistance, if the company refuses to give a proper licence, I will replace the grafic with another version which is then solely my work and do not use photographs of objects created by others. In the meantime I would be happy if you can postpone the deletion for some more days. --Dfedra (talk) 20:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you need to receive permission from copyrights owner first. Deleted files could be undeleted after permission arrival. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

Hi, I see you are active, could you please block on this one: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Нікк_лузер,_шавка,_шваль? Thanks — NickK (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detox01.jpg

Hi, you deleted this photo (used here) because of "Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Commercial packaging", but "This does not apply to photographs taken in a public place". I took it in the supermarket. So I think it should be ok.
Thanks for answer.
Psax (talk) 16:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works carefully. It doesn't matter where did you take such photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently deleted macOS Server logo

Hi EugeneZelenko! You recently deleted File:MacOS_Server.png, which I had uploaded. I’m mostly new with uploading media, and I wasn't sure what the reason was. Can I upload the same file with a smaller resolution? Also, there are a few other files that are very similar to this one that I have uploaded new versions of: Apple Configurator Logo and Apple Remote Desktop. Are these files okay to be used? And if so, how can I upload the macOS Server logo under the same kind of license as those files?

Thank you very much for your help!

Leejordan9 ✉️ 🛠 17:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some WMF projects like English Wikipedia allow to use non-free media and such files may be uploaded locally there. Commons is different project and has much more strict rules. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

	You have won two of the snuggliest cats ever!
	Thank you for helping me with licensing images! Leejordan9 ✉️ 🛠 17:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

These files [[8]] ARE my own work. Please remove all deletion requests because I don't know how to do it. Thanks.

You could upload photos in original camera resolution with EXIF to prove your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is total nonsense. I don't know what you're talking about, I don't know what EXIF is and I don't even want to know. And I have no time or desire to read long technical pages full of details half of which I don't understand. These pics WERE uploaded in original camera resolution, whatever that means, except for one (Marco Cassini) that was cut since I also appeared in the picture and I don't want my face to appear on Wikipedia. Period. I don't have to "prove" anything: since YOU are the one who questions my word, YOU are the one to prove what you imply. Have you seen my pics anywhere else on the Internet, by chance? No, you haven't. I'm not supposed to pledge my time to give evidence only because someone somewhere in Russia decides that the photos I have uploaded in Italy are "unlikely" to be my own work. Acqueamare (talk) 20:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Acqueamare (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:AN-notice|noticeboard=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#EugeneZelenko}}

Please help regarding this file

EugeneZelenko File:Saurav Das.png is uploaded as a screenshot from YouTube video, but I could not verify whether its a CC license YouTube video (because I did not find it there). If it fails then it should be removed as a copyright violation. Thanks Run n Fly (talk) 15:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Run n Fly: I tagged it as a copyvio for you. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for help! I deleted this file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I reported the uploader to ANB. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

copy right violation

Hi Please delete all the files uploadede by this user and block the account. all of them are copy right violation. all were taken from google image (film posters/paintings/sculptures/exhibition posters). thanks [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated all files for deletion. Some may be in public domain (like File:رامبراند خلج.jpg), but I think larger resolutions are already available on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this one is a book cover

https://didavarbook.com/products/14948/%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF-(%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF)

[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This book cover is based on Category:Self-portrait by Rembrandt (National Gallery, London) and simple text, so there is no copyrights violation. But is book notable? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MLBB deleted team logo HELP

Hello sir can you please educate me how can i upload the logos of the esports team that you recently deleted due to copyrights, isn't covered by the public domain since can be accessed edited by different people on different platforms? Thank you so much.

Please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of your country to understand basic ideas. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

B.H.U. Logo

Hi! Please, can you explain why was the commons file BHU Saraswati seal deleted? Your comment says non-trivial logo. The file is in public domain, and is the official seal/logo of the university. Seomelono (talk) 04:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean File:BHU Official Logo & Seal Combined.jpg? It's not trivial logo and university is not part of government, so public domain claims in file description were incorrect. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Can you please delete my photos? Sorry

Thank you, merry Xmas Play8boy21 (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photo

I apologize for the published pictures, I didn't really understand the way I can publish the pictures, so I published what I thought I could. I would ask you if it is possible not to cancel my account because I have only been here for 3 months and I am still learning. I have over 1000 changes and over 30 pages and templates made. I apologize once again, all the best! Nemanja055 (talk) 02:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing to avoid copyrights-related deletions and w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics about better format for diagrams. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ajlf2787

Hi EugeneZelenko. I wasn’t as sure about these two files as I was about the other ones uploaded this editor which is why I thought a DR would be more appropriate. Since you have deleted these two files as well, there’s no need for a DR any longer. Can anyone close the DR or does an admin have to close it? — Marchjuly (talk) 07:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I thought that Krdbot (talk · contribs) will do this for me. I should fight with my laziness :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that. I forgot that there's a bot that closes DRs in which the file being discussed is deleted before the discussion is closed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, new bot's task is to close deletion requests automatically when file(s) was/were deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lizenzfragen

File:Crest of FOST - Flag Officer Sea Training.gif
Must and can be deleted.
File:Sons of the Desert escutcheon.jpg
The creator of this has died in 1983. The secretary of the organisation the logo stands for allowed me by eMail to use the logo. He was thankfulfor the related article. If that is not enough, please delete.
File:Wappen Kreis Rotenburg i.H..jpg
This is the historic crest of a district in Lower Saxony/Germany that does not exost any more for a long time already. The crest was scanned from an old bill issued by the administration of the district in the 1920s. It is certainly public domain, no doubt about that. Whoever created the motive can no longer be established. If it is really necessary, say for legal reasons, deletion must go ahaed.

Happy new year --Landkraft (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For second file, please ask organization to send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:VRT/Noticeboard with permissions review.

Third file is obviously not your own work, so proper public domain license and source information specified.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Hey, could you please speed delete the file דנה בן-שמעון.jpg ? אקסינו (talk) 11:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is reason for deletion? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry

Hello. My name is koara4014. I can't write English well because I'm Japanese. If you are angry, please for give me.When I woke up, I saw your delete message. I was surprised. And sad. But I was think then [what? ]. After that notification I noticed a mistake. I'm sorry.I was not know[[9]]I will think of many cases and study Wikimedia. I'm sorry, but thank you. Somewhere again. -On the bed-Koara4014 (talk) 23:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC) koara4014[reply]

Please don't worry, I'm not angry. But please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.I read this.good bye. Koara4014 (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision deletion 2

Здравствуйте! С Новым годом и Рождеством!

Пожалуйста, удалите старую версию моего файла File:The Python Library Reference.pdf от 15:11, 5 января 2022 из-за сбоя при экспорте в PDF (одно слово вместо 2-х страниц). --Максим Пе (talk) 10:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Отличная шпаргалка! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coldplay Logo

You guys can delete it. I wasn't able to use it like I originally intended either. 2001:1284:F034:A211:B17A:DFB5:323A:123D 15:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests are closed after 7 days, so you still have opportunity to change your mind. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How to mark a photo for deletion?

Is there a simple way to mark a photo/file for deletion? I can't seem to find a way to delete my file myself. Gustamons (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check if Help:QuickDelete is checked on Gadgets page of Special:Preferences. File page should have Nominate for deletion link on sidebar. In future please use current talk page, not archives. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]