User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive24

File:Photography of Otto Toeplitz.jpg

Dear Eugene,

I am the owner of the photography of the photography of Otto Toeplitz. The latter photography is open to the public at the University Bonn. Everyone can make a photography and use it at will.

The bar chart displays Otto Toeplitz' numbers given in

"Toeplitz O 1927, Das Problem der Universitaetsvorlesungen ueber Infinitesimalrechnung und ihrer Abgrenzung gegenueber der Infinitesimalrechnung an den hoeheren Schulen, in: Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, Leipzig: Teubner, 88-100.

Nothing questionable here.

Best regards,

Horst Beyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horstbeyer (talk • contribs) 00:20, 08 August 2016 (UTC)

It's hard to tell how permanent display is to confirm Commons:Freedom of panorama#Germany. Will be good idea to find out information of original photographer, because photo may be in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Belu~cawiki

Dear Eugene,

I disagree with the decision of delete 3 files.

First of all, I'M THE AUTHOR OF THREE PICTURES. In the past I'd some problems with authority of files that I'd published (I'd permission but they are photos of my group, no mine. I preferred to accept the decision to eliminate despite having authorization.). But now I ONLY PUBLISH PICTURES THAT I'M THE AUTHOR.

Secondly, I am one of the top leaders or boss of group Bestialots Espurnats and I've absolute permission to publish pictures of the group, so the picture “Figura de Llucifer dels Bestialots Espurnats” is authorized by the group. And the group Farfolla is a sister organization of us. We share place, meetings, organization of events... I've authorization to publish the file Drac Farfolla de la Sagrada Familia.

Thirdly, the Tiger Mosquito and the Farfolla's pictures have been long enough and there have been no complaints until I've added a new one.

Finally, I think those pictures are interesting to the world of devils and beasts of fire. There is a great tradition in Catalonia by the culture of fire and those photos are very useful.

It's possible that I didn't select the correct license because I'm noob, but I'm the author.

I hope your answer. Thank you.

The files are:

• File:Figura de Llucifer dels Bestialots Espurnats de la Sagrada Família.jpg
• File:Mosquit Tigre de Fures de Can Baró.jpeg
• File:Drac Farfolla de la Sagrada Família.jpeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belu~cawiki (talk • contribs) 10:25, 07 August 2016 (UTC)

Problem that you made photos of other people works. See Commons:Derivative works. You need to get artists permissions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of the uploads of Bharathi's six Appendix 1,2,2cont.,3,4to8 and 9

Dear Eugene, Bharathi, a new script was invented by me in 1995, a copy of it was then sent to Government of India, a copy was handed over to Mr. Venkitaraman, then the retired President of India. If necessary I can submit some proofs for the fact that it was invented by me in 1995. But, it will take a lot of space. I am Indian aged 74, male, residing at 2,Krishnaveni; 19,Arokya Street; Elangonagar South; Virugambakkam; Chennai-600092; India. With regards: User T.K.Ramchand (Signed)19-07-2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.K. Ramchand (talk • contribs) 10:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates) is proper way to confirm authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of FEVEFUSA.jpg

Dear Eugene, I received the authorization of Venezuelan Federation of Futsal for using the logo, with licensingCC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL. I sent this authorization to wikimedia commons e-mail, and I received the releasing for image uploading with licensing PD-textlogo y Trademarked (volunteer:Oscar José Costero)}. So, I received authorization of the rights holder and of a Wikimedia volunteer. Then, I uploaded the logo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FEVEFUSA.jpg). What action must I to do to solve this trouble? I can to publish here the supporting e-mails. Best regards, --Jh0an1 Uzca73gu1 (talk) 09:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

This logo is not trivial, so {{PD-textlogo}} is not appropriate. If permission was sent to Commons:OTRS, please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with it review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Superpower

Hello. I added what I think was missing from the file. Let me know what else is missing. I'm new to this. Thanks! --Christiandash

You need to provide link to creator(s) site with license statement for this character. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

3 User

Hey, You Need to Block 3 User call

• Sanjo xD
• Bdnr
• Ferrasarry — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.243.166.90 (talk) 05:42, 07 February 2016 (UTC)

Please explain reason. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Sukanto Halder Date of bart- 14/08/1988 Kolkata Wast Bangal |father - Sukumar Halder Muthar - Shova Halder My girl Friend- Baby Nath My brather- Sudipto Halder Big Sister- Rani Halder Small Sister- Shipra Halder

Sukantohalder19 (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi this is Brooks mesha gay I just joyed this wikipedia page.M.Brooks Brooks mesha gay (talk) 02:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Scratch Day.JPG

No se porque desea eliminar la iamgen que subí referida al "Scratch Day" dado que es de mi autoría la obtuve yo misma y los estudiantes de las fotos son alumnos mios. Saludos cordiales

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read Commons:Project scope. Why do you think this photo is useful? Anyway quality is too low. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Robert A. Widenmann photo

The phot I attached to the webpage was recently nominated for deletion. I removed it. I thought it was available under public domain.

I originally got the photo from photobucket after clicking on the photo on the following website link: http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141746&highlight=photo+billy&page=3

I saved it to my Flickr as I thought it was public domain. Jcb42 (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory to find appropriate tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Translations

Sorry for my late reply! I haven't been doing much on Commons the last few days. Thank you for always being a great helper! Much appreciated!! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi whats up Hridoy006 (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Deleted pictures from Robert Gordon (writer and filmmaker)

Hello,

I am Robert Gordon's personal assistant, helping him to create a Wikipedia page.

Two of my uploaded images were deleted, but both images are directly from him, to me, for use on the Wikipedia page.

He wrote the book (image uploaded) and directed the movie (image uploaded).

How do I upload his images without them being deleted? What steps should I take to confirm that this won't happen again?

Please ask him to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

FVSU logo

I am affiliated with Fort Valley State University. You erroneously deleted the official FVSU logo for Fort Valley State University. The use of the logo on this Wikipedia page is covered under Fair Use. The previous logo highlighted on the page is incorrect.

Commons doesn't allow fair use content. See Commons:Licensing. You could upload non-free logos into English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Accidently Uploaded and Inserted image

Sorry, but I mistakenly uploaded the wrong image "Gauge Conversion to Broad Gauge.jpg". I realize it should be deleted. I want to delete the image as quick as possible. It has been nominated for speedy deletion and I want it deleted. What should I do?

This image could be found on other sites. If you are photographer, you could upload photo in full resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

David R. Jones (architect)

I've been researching David R. Jones for 30+ years. Over the years I've gotten some of his architectural drawings and this picture. As far as I know it is the only one in existence. When it was taken and by who, I'm sure will never be known. There is a picture of his in a Welsh article, but I didn't feel comfortable using that because of copyright laws. These are the only two pictures of him that I know of. I feel a picture is important in helping historians get a sense of who this man was.

When subject died? May be this photo is in public domain because of time of creation as anonymous work? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Origami Tux folding instructions

Since the diagrams where made using Inkscape, they can be uploaded in SVG. In case you decide to maintain it.

PERMISSION MISSING: File:Author T. Styles.jpg: Toy Styles

Hello,

Per your request, I followed the procedure to receive authorization for the photo. I had prior authorization before uploading but Mrs. Styles has given Wiki written authorization via the email template.

I also forwarded Wikimedia Commons the email from Styles' after she provided written request which includes our correspondences. The ticket number is: 2016022510027571].

Thank you for your assistance.

Sorry, I don't have OTRS access. Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Picture Deletion

SOrry, I'm not sure how else to respond to your comment on File:Wikipedia Tables.pdf has been nominated for deletion. I would be happy to change this from a pdf to in the text itself though I'm not sure how to do that. These tables have not been published somewhere else but were created by our team. Thanks. Kyle Jones

See w:en:Help:Table. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Picture of David R Jones (architect)

I'm at a loss as to why I can't use a picture that I own and posses. The reason I got the picture was in order to use it for purposes like this. Am I suppose to donate it to the State Historical Society and ask their permission to use it? Pacaland (talk) 18:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

It's definitely not your work. This photo may be in public domain, but reason should be stated. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Photos of Nick Gorshenin, all personal property and scanned from originals

Hi Thanks for your communication. I am new at this and hope I have answered your enquiries re copyright of the photos correctly in the system, which is a little daunting! Pls advise whether I've managed to navigate correctly - I found the REASON prompt particularly confusing. Thanks again Donga Nick (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Удаление изображений

Не могли бы вы мне пояснить, почему вы удалили файл File:Factorio-logo.png, хотя я написал на странице обсуждения, почему считаю возможным свободное использование этого файла, а также попросил помочь мне с выбором подходящей лицензии? Gjrfytn (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Это нетривиальный современный логотип. Вы можете загрузить его в русскую Википедию как несвободное изображение. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Хорошо, я так и сделаю. Меня смутила статья про иллюстрирование русской википедии, в следующий раз буду внимательней. К сожалению, я уже успел загрузить файл логотипа другой игры, с аналогичными, судя по всему, атрибутами. Покорнейше прошу также его удалить. Спасибо за помощь. Gjrfytn (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Вы загрузили другой логотип в русскую Википедию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

David R Jones (architect)

Thank you for your response. David R Jones died in 1915. The picture was taken circa 1905, I believe in Cambria Wisconsin USA. Because of the age and location of the photo, it should meet the criteria for a public domain picture. I would like to include it in the article as I think it would greatly enhance it. It would be nice if the reader would have a visual idea of what David R Jones looked like while reading about his life. Pacaland (talk) 22:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I restored file and add correct license tag. Please add rest of information, preferably with references, you mentioned here. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

My details

Sukanto Halder Date of bart- 14/08/1988 Kolkata Wast Bangal |father - Sukumar Halder Muthar - Shova Halder My girl Friend- Baby Nath My brather- Sudipto Halder Big Sister- Rani Halder Small Sister- Shipra Halder

Sukantohalder19 (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Why do you think that all this is relevant on my talk page? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File

Bonjour,
Vous avez fait une demande de suppression du fichier que j'ai moi-même créé pour accompagner ma demande d'aide sur un problème rencontré par rapport au codage d'un groupe de références (File:Codage des articles avec groupe de références.pdf)
Je ne souhaitais pas véritablement que cela intègre la base des documents de Wikimedia Commons. Or je n'ai pas trouvé d'option d'intégration d'un document sans l'ajouter à cette base.
Etant novice, je ne possède pas encore toutes les connaissances nécessaires à une bonne pratique sur Wikipédia, aussi j'aurais aimé que vous m'en parliez avant d'effectuer une demande qui aurait pu être certainement évitée ou tout au moins m'en expliquer clairement les raisons et me dire comment procéder dans ce cas de figure.
Je vais donc supprimer ce fichier de la discussion puisqu'il n'est plus nécessaire (l'aide m'a été apportée) et présenterais tout codage autrement car j'ai acquis récemment (après cet ajout) la compétence pour le faire à travers l'utilisation des balises "code" et "nowiki".
Cordialement,
--Ecoom5 (talk) 15:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Do you really need this code snippets? Why <code> is not good enough for you? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016

Hi Eugene — I've now closed the adminship inactivity run for February-March this year and submitted a request to have their admin privileges removed here on Commons. As @Cecil is on that list, I believe you'll have to unsubscribe her from the bureaucrats-commons mailing list if she's still subscribed. (A steward will most likely remove her rights over the next couple of hours.) Thanks :-) odder (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Фотографии из статей

Здравствуйте, Евгений! В ходе обсуждения "Википедия:К восстановлению/15 марта 2016" мне порекомендовали обратиться к одному из администраторов Викисклада.

Суть вопроса: Прошу восстановить в русскоязычную википедию под несвободными лицензиями следующие фотографии:

1. Фотография, бывшая в шаблоне-карточке статьи "Козырев, Анатолий Иванович" (1918—1980), т.к. герой статьи умер, а фотографии такого качества в интернете нет (если невозможно восстановление, то в прим. 2 к статье есть другая фотография (стр. 37 файла pdf) - загрузите её).

2. Фотография, бывшая в шаблоне-карточке статьи "Невежин, Тимофей Онисимович", т.к. этот памятник - самое известное изображение героя статьи. Памятник был демонтирован в 1990 г. и впоследствии утилизирован. Возможно ли появление этой фотографии в галерее работ А.И. Козырева?

Фотографии на "Викисклад" загружал не я.

Заранее спасибо. So categorical (talk) 07:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Илья Лайт. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Вы можете загрузить фотографии как не-свободные в русскую Википедию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Фотографии на "Викисклад" загружал не я. У меня не осталось копий файлов. Есть ли у Вас возможность временно восстановить, чтобы скопировать в русскую Википедию эти фотографии с "Викисклада"? Заранее спасибо. So categorical (talk) 17:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Вы не могли бы сказать Ваш адрес электронной почты, чтобы я послал Вам файлы? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Файлы я нашёл среди временных файлов интернета и загрузил. Извините за беспокойство. С уважением, So categorical (talk) 15:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC).

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination Notification

Hi EugeneZelenko/Archive24

You were previously nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways). Congratulations and thank you for your hard work!

Please email us at merchandise@wikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt.

Thanks! Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 14:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your nominations of simple logos

Why do you thing that Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful is a valid reason for deletion? Most of the files that you nominated for deletion are actually in use (like File:Fujifilm old logo.png transferred from the english Wikipedia, notable company), or, at least, properly categorised (File:Star Wars Black Russian Logo.png, categorised at Category:Star Wars). If you don't want to make more constructive contributions like making SVGs, please stop making these non-sense nominations. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Even if logo is notable, it doesn't make sense to keep unused raster versions of it. You may not agree with my position, but it's your right to do so. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Then, double check if the file is actually used, specially if it was transferred (that are generally not used until it deleted at the local Wipipedia). As you as admin, should know that unused itself is not a valid reason for deletion, and neither policy forbids the existence of unused raster logos by itself; for that reason exist {{Convert to SVG}}, and if we follow your logic, Category:Images_that_should_use_vector_graphics would not exist (there are thousand of files that you could nominate following your logic).

What about if the file is deleted at Wikipedia due was transferred to Commons, and it is deleted in Commons due your DRs? Wikipedia will lose the file, and the community will lose a historic logo. Some common sense please. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Why they are blindly transmitted instead of calling of graphics specialist on English Wikipedia/Commons to recreate or attempt to find SVG version?

I Use Global Usage Badges gadget before nominating.

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Again, double and triple check the file usage. Today, you nominated two files in use (this and this). You should see not just the Global usage, but also the file history and the descriptions, specially for file transfers.

Neither policy forbid to upload raster graphics, so your reasoning for deletion of graphics seems too weak for me; if the file illustrate something or is a logo of a notable company (like Fujifilm), is in scope, regadress if is or not in use. If you really want to do more productive actions with graphics, then, add the files to Category:Images that should use vector graphics, to leave the works to other users (like me) to make the SVGs, instead of getting rid them. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Everybody could make mistakes, including me and software behind MediaWiki. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Восстановление предыдущей версии страницы TeleTrade

Евгений, добрый день, после внесения новой информации на страницу https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeleTrade - все загруженные файлы (картинка, видео), а также текстовая информация была удалена (перечень наград компании). Я понимаю, что видео могло содержать определенную промо-информацию и не возражаю против его удаления, но картинка с изображением офиса и наград компании, на мой взгляд, не имела никакой рекламной информации. Другим компаниям нашей тематики почему-то разрешено добавлять такую информацию:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_Dow_Jones_Indices#Awards
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schlumberger

Я не понимаю почему именно наши награды и картинки удалили, что это за дискриминация?

Более того - удалили весь раздел "Sponsorship", который был добавлен на страницу несколько лет назад - почему его удалили???

Мое обращения к модератору Mean_as_custard, к сожалению, было проигнорировано. Мой аккаунт TeleTrade Cyprus был заблокирован и переименовать его не разрешили.

Евгений,помогите, пожалуйста, разобраться в сложившейся ситуации, т.к. ответственные модераторы не отвечают и куда еще обращаться я не знаю. Заранее спасибо.

Насколько понимаю, речь идёт о Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TeleTrade Cyprus.

Видео - явная реклама. Статуэтки и нетривиальные логотипы не созданы этой компанией, соответственно авторские права принадлежат кому-то другому.

Если материалы, созданные компанией всё-таки входят в Commons:Рамки проекта, то на них надо оформить разрешение через Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates).

О требованиях к статьям в английской Википедии много сказать не могу, но явно рекламный текст не является нейтральным по определению.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo AUF.jpg

Hi EugeneZelenko. Can you tell if File:Logo AUF.jpg is the same as File:AUF Logo.png, File:AUF Icon.png or any of these? You deleted "File:AUF Logo.png" back in June 2015, and the other files were deleted as copyvios. The same logo can be seen at auf.org.uy/Portal/HOME/ with only a slight difference in the coloring of the stripes. If it's better to take this to COM:DR, then let me know and I will. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo AUF.jpg is same logo as in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Asociación Uruguaya de Fútbol, but different form File:AUF Logo.png and File:AUF Icon.png. Actually File:Logo AUF.jpg design is more complex then other of File:AUF Logo.png and File:AUF Icon.png. I'll delete File:Logo AUF.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

File:KBOO-FM.png

I say it's a speedy keep. The logo is used on w:KBOO, a notable radio station. MB298 (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Pepperdine Library photo

Hello EugeneZelenko,

I've change the ownership information of the historical photo used in my sandbox page (I'm working on a draft for Pepperdine's library page). Please let me know if this is an acceptable change.

It's likely that photo is in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Pulled from the metadata of this photo in our digital archives: "Copyright to photographs in this collection, in most cases, is retained by Pepperdine University. Images are intended for educational and research use, and may be used for non-commercial purposes with appropriate attribution. Organizations and individuals seeking to use images for publication must assume all responsibility for identifying and satisfying any claimants of copyright. Such parties should contact Pepperdine University Special Collections and University Archives."

Commons doesn't allow non-commercial content. See Commons:Licensing. So only hope is to find more information about photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Nominations for deletion of my PDF files from Wikiversity

Hi. I had uploaded the following PDF files for my Wikiversity lesson assignment in my Master's degree program: 1. Checklist for procedural analysis.pdf 2. Sample inputs and outputs of procedural analysis.pdf

I created these files for the lesson. So they are my copyright. Pls don't delete them. Pls tell me how to remove them from the nomination for deletion list. Kbhalla-IU (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Kamakshi Bhalla

Please read deletion request carefully. It's not about copyrights, it's about Commons:Project scope. Wiki-text is much better format for such purposes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

So should I remove the PDFs from Wikiversity, upload them again on Wikimedia commons, and then link them again to my Wikiversity pages? Kbhalla-IU (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)KamakshiBhalla

No. You should create wiki-text (with content of PDF in question) on Wikiversity. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

I have created Wiki text - that is, subpages under my lesson - containing the PDFs' content. So the PDFs I uploaded can be removed as per the nominations for deletion.Kbhalla-IU (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please mention this on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Deleting

Media files I uploaded do not violate the copyright rules. They are contributed on the web-sites, and available for the public. However, authors ask mentioning their web-site when using their media files. I mentioned their web-sites, so there is no any copyright violation in my case. Please, have a look in the media I have uploaded. That media is free in Uzbekistan as some of them are translated on TV channels

Availability and copyrights status are different things. Please read Commons:Licensing carefully before making your next upload. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

No upload

Hopefully I will not upload pictures, but please do not delete those pictures which are left. For instance the file saidamin.jpg is taken by me from book. And other pictures are acceptable too I hope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yunuskhuja Tuygunkhujaev (talk • contribs) 14:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, if you'll not provide evidence that photos were releases under claimed licenses, they'll be deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

잘못된 저작권 신고

최근삭제된 File:Alley.gif File:Back Street.gif File:Bunker.gif File:CST.jpg File:Control Room.gif File:D-S AKM.jpg File:D-S AS50.jpg File:D-S FAMAS.jpg File:D-S G36C.jpg File:D-S HK-91.jpg File:D-S K2.jpg File:D-S M249.jpg File:D-S M4A1.jpg File:D-S MSR.jpg File:D-S Mark16.jpg File:D-S P90.jpg File:D-S PSG-1.jpg File:D-S SVD.jpg File:D-S X-mas K2.jpg File:DESERT EAGLE.jpg File:Delta Force.jpg File:GLOCK 23.jpg File:Guardpost.gif File:HATCHET.jpg File:KUKURI.jpg File:Lab.gif File:M870.jpg File:M9 specialsoldier.jpg File:SHOVEL.jpg File:STRIKER 12.jpg File:SafeHouse.gif File:Stairway.gif File:Station.gif File:Supply Base.gif File:UTS-15.jpg File:WareHouse.gif File:XMAS CANDY CANE.jpg File:XMAS GLOCK23.jpg File:산타캐.jpg File:Blackwater.jpg 는 잘못된 저작권 신고입니다.

웰게임즈가 계발한 게임에서 캡처한 사진들입니다. 웰게인즈는 저작권관련 조항에 이렇게 명시해 두었습니다.

도움이 될까하여 덧글씁니다.

스패셜솔져 이용약관 중 저작권 관련 조항입니다

제18조 (저작권 등의 귀속) 1.서비스 내 회사가 제작한 콘텐츠에 대한 저작권 기타 지적재산권은 회사의 소유입니다. 2.회원은 회사가 제공하는 게임서비스를 이용함으로써 얻은 정보 중 회사 또는 제공업체에 지적재산권이 귀속된 정보를 회사 또는 제공업체의 사전승낙 없이 복제, 전송, 출판, 배포, 방송 기타 방법에 의하여 영리목적으로 이용하거나 제3자에게 이용하게 하여서는 안 됩니다. 3.회원은 게임내에서 보여지거나 게임서비스와 관련하여 회원 또는 다른 이용자가 게임 클라이언트 또는 게임서비스를 통해 업로드 또는 전송하는 대화 텍스트를 포함한 커뮤니케이션, 이미지, 사운드 및 모든 자료 및 정보(이하 ‘이용자 콘텐츠’라 한다.)에 대하여 회사가 다음과 같은 방법과 조건으로 이용하는 것을 허락합니다.

(1) 해당 이용자 콘텐츠를 이용, 편집 형식의 변경 및 기타 변형하는 것(공표, 복제, 공연, 전송, 배포, 방송, 2차적 저작물 작성 등 어떠한 형태로든 이용 가능하며, 이용기간과 지역에는 제한이 없음) (2) 이용자 콘텐츠를 제작한 이용자의 사전 동의 없이 거래를 목적으로 이용자 콘텐츠를 판매, 대여, 양도 행위를 하지 않음 4.게임 내에서 보여지지 않고 게임서비스와 일체화되지 않은 회원의 이용자 콘텐츠(예컨대, 일반게시판 등에의 게시물)에 대하여 회사는 회원의 명시적인 동의가 없이 상업적으로 이용하지 않으며, 회원은 언제든지 이러한 이용자 콘텐츠를 삭제할 수 있습니다. 5.회사는 회원이 게시하거나 등록하는 게임서비스 내의 게시물, 게시 내용에 대해 제 13조에서 규정하는 금지행위에 해당된다고 판단되는 경우, 사전통지 없이 이를 삭제하거나 이동 또는 등록을 거부할 수 있습니다. 6.회사가 운영하는 게시판 등에 게시된 정보로 인하여 법률상 이익이 침해된 회원은 회사에게 당해 정보의 삭제 또는 반박내용의 게재를 요청할 수 있습니다. 이 경우 회사는 신속하게 필요한 조치를 취하고, 이를 신청인에게 통지합니다. 7.제3항은 회사가 서비스를 운영하는 동안 유효하며 회원탈퇴 후에도 지속적으로 적용됩니다.

저작권 관련해서 스크린샷공유는 괜찮다는 뜻입니다. 위 파일들을 복구해 주십시오. K1A22015 (talk) 15:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Korean :-( Files you uploaded were game screenshots and artwork. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:Screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

After deletion

What will happen after the deletion of the media file? I mean my accaunt will be banned? And till what time should I send the licenses?Yunuskhuja Tuygunkhujaev (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

You'll not be blocked if you'll not violate Commons:Licensing. You could provide your comments on deletion request pages. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

please delete old versions with missing licensing

Can you please delete the old versions of: File:Det_JoKa008-Model.pdf, they contained a small part which wasn't drawn by myself, therfore I'm not shure about licensing. Is there a possibility to add a {{delete}} to an unwanted version? -- JoKalliauer (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

 Done. Unfortunately not. You need to ask administrator or request help on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

updated license

Hello Eugene,

The book that you marked for deletion due to missing evidence of permission (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mihail_Mihaylov.pdf) is now released with the proper license (see page 5 of the document). The images from the book (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Veliko_tyrnovo.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mihail_mihaylov_conference.jpg) contain the same license and therefore should not be deleted. Please let me know if this is enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyantyst (talk • contribs)

Commons doesn't accept non-commercial licenses. See Commons:License.

Does all book contributors (author, photographer, artist) agree to license change?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, both authors agree to the license, but it has to be non-commercial. In that case the images and book cannot be published to Commons? It's ok to move the book somewhere else, but how can I display the images in the article then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyantyst (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker) @Psyantyst: Then it is not allowed on Commons, because it has to be free for any purpose, including commercially. You may upload it on the English Wikipedia as fair use however. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 12:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Восстановление страницы

Можете восстановить на пару дней страницу User:Niruku/Tools? — Khilletzbal (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Вы не могли бы объяснить причину? Всё-таки это персональная страница, удалённая по запросу владельца.

В последней верссии почти что ничего нет, кроме списка категорий и полезных ссылок/заготовок.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Dr Maniruzzaman 2016 with Bangla Academy Award.jpg and File:Dr Maniruzzaman photo 2011.jpg

Hello. You want me to send email about permission, but email was already sent. Ticket#: 2016041210020043. What should I do? Thank you. M.Hasan2016 (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. M.Hasan2016 (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of talk page revisions

It appears you deleted nine (9) intermediate revisions on my talk page on 2 April 2016, creating a gap in the revision history. Please explain why you did this. — Quicksilver^@ 02:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of some of my files

Hello, I’ve made some changes to the licence of the following files :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ant%C3%B4nio_Pedro_de_Figueiredo.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_L%C3%A9ger_Vauthier.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_L%C3%A9ger_Vauthier.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pega_os_Quebra-Kilos_Rua_Tenorio.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Aos_Quebra-Kilos_Rua_L._do_Ros%C3%A1rio.jpg&action=history
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pega_os_Quebra-Kilos_Travessa_do_Apollo.jpg

I admit that I uploaded those files in a somewhat cavalier fashion, and I apologize for that. I hope the files will now be accepted in Commons.Torsade de Pointes (talk) 13:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing problem. I remove deletion requests from these files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Фотографии

Большое спасибо за Ваши комментарии и Вашу работу. Я внес соответствующие изменения в правовой статус фотографий, сделанных мной, и, надеюсь, что они смогут и дальше оставаться в Википедии.

А Вы не могли бы загрузить их в оригинальном разрешении для подтверждения авторства? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	It gets lonely at COM:BRFA, thanks for the company. If it wasn't for you, I'm sure I'd be talking to myself.. :) Riley Huntley (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Musical Theatre-1.jpg

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

There's going to be a couple more of these it seems, apologies in advance. Storkk (talk) 13:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Hotel Belarus.jpg

And also:

• File:Belarus-Minsk-Hotel Minsk.jpg
• File:Belarus-Minsk-Hotel Tourist.jpg

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Deleting images which copyright by

I ask you to delete requests to remove images that I uploaded previously, these images are reserved by copyright. AssafZalmanov 20:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Could you please clarify? If you sent permission to Commons:OTRS, please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. If images are in public domain, proper information and license tag should be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Blickensderfer typewriter keyboard layout

User:Martinwill2 Hello Eugene:

Re my recent upload of a typewriter keyboard layout I don't understand why you are recommending it for deletion.

I am puzzled by the request to delete my Blickensderfer keyboard layout diagram Deletion requests/File:BlickLayout.qpw.pdf and don't know all the intricacies of communication with the person who reviewed it, Eugene Zelenko. What I have is an early Blickensderfer 7 made prior to February 04, 1897, with a DHIATENSOR keyboard that is not shown in Wikipedia and is different from the American version. Blickensderfer opened the London location early in 1897, and made Blickensderfer typewriters for the English market there. The keyboard layout I have is different than anything I've seen on other Blickensderfer typewriter-related sites or the most often cited book about the Blickensderfer history. None of the photos I've seen or keyboard layouts I've seen have the layout of my typewriter, which has the fractions 1/8, 1/4, 3/8, 1/2, 5/8, 3/4, and 7/8 in the FIG shift, along with the English pound £ symbol. As it has an early serial number, 13277 B, which predates the number in the Blickensderfer serial number table, entry "1897 FEB 04 Serial No. 14053" it is possibly an early prototype of the "London Blick". I bought it from a friend in Saffron Walden, Essex, England back in 1956 before I went to college in 1957. Since there probably aren't all that many London Blicks around, it might be a keyboard layout of little utility, but possibly of significant interest to antique typewriter collectors. The file I uploaded is a pdf file (the .qpw conveys that it was created in a Quattro Pro Worksheet). If you would prefer a different format, it could easily be converted. I think it is of enough historical importance to be retained in the Blickensderfer history and/or the articles about early typewriters or about keyboard layouts. I could also upload a photograph of the typewriter if you would prefer that, but some of the key tops are worn and you may not be able to make out what the symbols are just from the photograph.

Please read w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics and w:en:Raster graphics to understand reason for deletion. It'll be much better to recreate this image in SVG format. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Colonnello Giovanni Duca.jpg

Hi Eugene, I'm helping the new user Andrea Cascioli about that picture. He was trying to contact you but he incorrectly wrote in his own talk page (User talk:Andrea Cascioli). The picture is in PD by Italian law, I put the right license template and added some information. Please let us know if there is further information needed. Thank you. Best, --Baruneju (talk) 11:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for help! I closed deletion request as kept. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

pold1 deletion of figures

Hi,

I got your message on deletion of figures. Are these all extra figures that I had uploaded and not used? I am new to this and was not able to understand. As long as you are not deleting any of the figures in the actual article, I am fine with it. Please confirm.

Thanks, Sanjee

Здравствуйте, при добавлении файла File:Game logo kripts.png я написал, что у меня есть разрешение автора на использование этого файла, к тому же, я поместил ссылку на официальный сайт игры в статью, где этот файл находится в свободном доступе. Почему вы его удалили?

Из текста никак не были очевидны условия использования. Commons разрешает только свободные изображения. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. Если обладатель авторских прав согласен на одну из свободных лицензий, то он может послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом Вы можете попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением изображений. Если нет, то Вы можете загрузить изображение как несвободное в проекты, где это разрешается. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Logo mozgoboj.pdf

Добрый день! Хотелось бы узнать причину удаления файла здесь. MisterXS (talk) 15:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Это явно нетривиальный логотип. Кто является автором? Соответствует ли лицензия Commons:Лицензирование? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Я очень плохо знаю все нюансы лицензирований, потому как в основном загружаю файлы по fair use. Автором логотипа является Екатерина Максимова, она же и загрузила файл по свободной лицензии. MisterXS (talk) 14:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Файлы по fair use можно загружать только локально в проекты, где они разрешены. Но не в Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

а разве удалённый файл не был загружен под лицензией? MisterXS (talk) 14:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Это не важно. Файл должен был быть загружен в русскую Википедию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Потому что логотипы не загружаются в commons? MisterXS (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

В Commons нельзя загружать несвободные файлы. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Uc color 01.png - Por favor no recree imágenes suprimidas / Don't recreate deleted images

Hello EugeneZelenko, you sent me the warning that I've recreated a deleted image, but the truth is that I didn't do it, another user who is helping me to solve the copyright issue with the image (for the University where I work) did it. The user who is helping me is Jarekt. You can see the discussion (talk) to see all the talks that we have had so far. The thing is, as I said before, that I didn't recreated anything, Jarekt did it because I ask him for help to upload the information about the trademark laws, so he recreated to allow me to complete the copyright info. I am new in Wikipedia, so I don't know what to do... Jarekt deleted the file, then he recreated it and now you delete it again, and you are warning me that I could lost the privilege to edit content. What should I do?

File:Uc color 01.png

This logo is non-trivial and looks very modern. I highly doubt that it's in public domain or released under terms of free license compatible with Commons:Licensing. However you could upload such logos locally in projects which allow non-free files, like English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko Ok. I understand your point, but how can I put the real public domain tag or the free license tag if you deleted the image and you are warning me that if I do it again I could lost the privilege to edit content... can you upload the image again to fix the problem and put the right license tag? -- Alejandro Figueroa Escobar (talk) 16:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Could you please explain why do you think that this image is in public domain? Using random license tag will not make image free. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Kaldırma türküsü.ogg, File:Bän üssüz kaldım.ogg

Здравствуйте. По этим файлам Вами были проставлены шаблоны-предупреждения относительно того, что информация об авторстве неполная и отсутствует источник. Я загрузил аудиофайл собственного авторства и отредактировал его с помощью редактора, убрав шумы и пробелы (поэтому метаданные не отображаются). Оригинальная аудиозапись с метаданными устройства звукозаписи непригодна для загрузки и нормальной прослушки. Не могли бы Вы подсказать, как можно решить эту проблему (если дело в этом) или как заполнить информацию об авторстве/указать источник аудиофайла, чтобы они удовлетворяли правилам? Спасибо. --Беспристраст (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

А кто является автором песни/музыки? Или она народная? Информация об этом должна присутствовать в описании. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Мелодия и слова народные. Запись исполнения производил я. Исполнитель песни — из народа. Я внёс соответствующее дополнение к описанию. В статье, где использованы файлы, есть уточнения по каждому файлу. При необходимости могу предоставить оригинальные версии записей с полными метаданными, но, как я говорил выше, они не пригодны для нормальной прослушки (много пустых пробелов и местами шумы). Также есть видеоподтверждение по песне «Kaldırma türküsü» (по второй, к сожалению, нет). --Беспристраст (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Ещё и удалили, хотя и месяца не прошло. Агрессивная у вас тут контора. --Беспристраст (talk) 02:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

В File:Bän üssüz kaldım.ogg напишите, пожалуйста, про Uzun kavak vardan (народная? общественное достояние?).

Я восстановил файлы. Вообще-то срок даётся недельный, хотя обычно было больше.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

«Uzun kavak vardan» является народной песней гагаузов Болгарии (начало XX в.). «Bän üssüz kaldım» исполнена с другим текстом (также народным, но более поздним) с использованием мелодии из «Uzun kavak vardan» (вот так звучит «Uzun kavak vardan» (c 6:00)). --Беспристраст (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Думаю, теперь всё в порядке. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

reply for this post I uploaded earlier SVG images, but unfortunetly they didn't look good – shapes and letters on that images was moved and this image was completly crashed and unreadable. So I decided to upload in PDF format, bacause this is stil vector graphic (unlike PNG or JPG) and images is not distorted after upload to commons.wikimedia.org. The SVG images that I upload earlier are now deleted because they was crashed ang ureadable. I use inkscape 0.91 to edit images. Ololuki (talk) 12:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I think Commons:Graphics village pump will be best place to ask for help. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Ship Nezshin

The photo maden by me due to my search via Internet. It is Internet search to confirm that ship's name and city name НЕЖИН was written in another manner as Nezshin and not as Nezhin today. I tried to prove it before and only by this search it possible and I afraid that later will not possible to confirm that same. It why this photo placed in article SS Nezhin as if later this search will not possible to do can be will not possible to prove that the ships with Russian name НЕЖИН (built in XIX century) was named on NEZSHIN on English. And Soviet ship НЕЖИН (built in 1954) had nema NEGIN or NEZSHIN before 1974. It delete this confirmation - somebody will delete again the part of text in article SS Nezhin due to absent confirmation. One time I already wrote the same text about and the text was deleted due to confirmation absent. Now the confirmation present, but declared to be deleted. What to do??? How to confirm???

Грищук ЮН (talk) 17:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Modern search results could not proof too much. Historical documents or records in databases could. You could refer to Google or other search engine on article talk page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Image Deletion - File:Hypixel_Insignia.jpg

The image File:Hypixel_Insignia.jpg isn't a copyright violation, the file had been OTRS submitted already. Please do not simply delete files. I will upload it again; because there isn't any violation, it is under the Creative Commons 4.0 License. 

Signed, Target360YT (talk) 04:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Target360YT: Hello, please do not reupload images that are deleted, please use COM:REFUND instead. I was about to tag the file for speedy deletion, but since you said that the author has sent an email to the OTRS, then {{OTRS pending}}. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 09:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Грищук ЮН

Добрый день! Ваши действия мне не понятны. Если Вы относите эти фото к историческим, то зачем тогда тормозить меня. Я бы ещё парочку или более выложил не менее интересных. Интересно, какова будет судьба выложенных в Вики мною моих фото? их удалят или поставят лэйбу не копировать? Я бы и сам поставил лэйбу не копировать, но не нашёл как.

Нежин и Караганда - это семечки. Я на 25 судах работал и Тойво Антикайнен один из них. Вот там, да! Мало не показалось, и папы на них не было. Так что, теперь все мои фото удалять будут?

Не понятно, зачем удалять, я же поделился фотографиями. Ранее я выставил 3 фото Нежина (вместе). Там в углу на одной из них фото моего папы. Эти три фото я выставил в статье ПИРАТЫ XX ВЕКА. До сих пор там. Так почему же вы удаляете одиночные фото Нежина и не поставили на удаление те 3 фото вместе?

С рождения был определён, сами понимаете куда. Много обещали. Понимал не сразу, что много и ничего не требовал. Обманули. Правда пережил я их, КГБ.

Хотите, я ещё одну или две фото выставлю и тогда вы ещё одно судно удалите или фото оттуда полетят? А они, фото, Вам очень понравятся!

Вы мне разъясните судьбу фотографий, которые я выложил, в случае, если их удалят. Пожалуйста.

С Уважением!!! Грищук ЮН (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Я выставил на удаление фотографии, которые были сделаны явно не Вами. В запросе на удаление Вы указали, что они были сделаны Вашим отцом, но вопросы наследования авторских прав не очевидны и нуждаются в подтверждениях. Рекомендую по этому поводу прочитать закон об авторском праве Ваше страны.

Если можно, то в будущих обсуждениях избегайте эмоций, никак не относящихся к предмету обсуждения.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Theta Xi Coat of Arms.png

Hi EugeneZelenko. This file us the same as File:Theta Xi Crest.png which you deleted as a copyvio. It's the same uploader, so they might understand that Commons dies not accept non- free content. -- -----

Thank you for help! Looks like file was reuploaded after deletion. I deleted it again and left relevant message on user's talk page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Adding Public Domain to inserted pictures

Eugene - First time contributor. Struggling to update copyright categorization of the images I uploaded. Any advice as I find the system not very intuitive. The images uploaded where published in our club's member-only publication "Foreward Press" back in 1954. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

But in which country? Are photographers known? Photos are likely to be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Clariant Corporate Presentation ENG 2016.pdf

Dear Eugene Thanks for your message to me about this, which you sent on 5 June 2016. I asked Clariant for permission, and they have on 10.6.16 sent the following email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

To Whom It May Concern, I hereby affirm that Clariant agrees to publish the file: Clariant Corporate Presentation ENG 2016.pdf under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so Clariant grants anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Kind Regards, Alissa Lorentz

---

Alissa Lorentz Managing Editor Online Communications Group Communications

Clariant International Ltd | Hardstrasse 61 | 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland Phone: +41 61 469 70 44 | Mobile: +41 79 251 30 56 | E-Mail: alissa.lorentz@clariant.com

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, LinkedIn

I trust this resolves the issue. Please can you confirm? Kind regards Gattikon 12.14 10 June 2016

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. From other point of view, I don't think that this file fit into Commons:Project scope. Link in article to corporate web site is more then enough. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

2015 Stella logo

"14:03, 15 June 2016 EugeneZelenko (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Stella Artois current logo 2015.png (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-trivial corporate logo)"

I'm a little surprised by this because IIRC this image had an OTRS permissions ticket attached. I queried that myself since it seemed unlikely that Anheuser-Busch wanted to give us permission to alter and redistribute it, but was told it was valid. 2001:630:212:238:222:4DFF:FE69:DE59 14:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice it. I restored file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

this is my photo

De Mazid islam এই ছবিটা আমার ৷ এতএব ওটা রাখা হোক ৷

Please read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hip-hop show (Dispero album) and sandbox

Hello i want to ask you why you delete the music and the video. Its free on youtube for all the people, if i am wrong and if you want can you help me to show me the way to upload again? thank you Natasha Pap (talk) 20:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Standard YouTube License in not compatible with Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Tanja

Walid boulifa (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Transporte.png

Hello!

I would like to know how I can give the rights to authors if most of my images are made for an academic projects that I participated.--Ing.mercado (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Ing.mercado--Ing.mercado (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Only authors of work could give permissions. See also Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. But I doubt that Discovery channel will do this. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Далматин

Здравствуйте. Я наверно сперва представлюсь. Меня зовут Петко Игорь Александрович, я заводчик и владелец монопородного питомника далматинов в Украине - IMPERIUM LEGIONIS, город Николаев https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqzGYGokX5A. Имею огромный опыт общения с этими собаками, владею информацией и на данный момент пишу статью о породе Далматин https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Далматин. Это просто чтоб вы понимали что статью пишет не дядяваня а человек который профессионально занимается данной породой. Теперь о главном. Мне сперва пришли сообщения на удаления файлов pdf, ну не хотите хранить оригиналы у себя на сервере и бог сними, заменил на ссылки(которые завтра конечно могут быть/будут уже "битыми"). Пишу статью, тут сегодня снова пришли сообщения на удаления изображений: File:Далматин (сучасний тип).jpg File:Істрійський гончак (сучасний тип).jpg File:Істрійський гончак (класичний тип).jpg У меня редчайшие исторические изображения далматинов, начиная от фресок и наскальных изображений до фоток ВОВ. На некоторых не указаны авторы, нет авторов, какая лицензия если авторы неизвестны. Бесит прям стараешся пишеш, тут "файлы подоговлены для удаления". Я не ворую чужие изображения, использую только то что в сети в СВОБОДНОМ доступе. Ребят, я пишу эту статью и пожалуйста прошу не мешайте, я буду писать статью дальш, но когда прийдет сообщение об удалении изображений - я удалю все фото, изоражения, ВЕСЬ МАТЕРИАЛ и всю статью, будет как было - статья-пустышка в две строки. Имейте совесть, цените чужой труд и время, у меня его не так много. И, у меня к вам просьба будет, проверьте в статье орфографию, это будет лучшая ваша помощ т.к. украинська мова в мене не дуже.

Своодный доступ никак не означает свободной лицензии. К тому же никак нельзя утверждать о собственном авторстве для изображений, сделанных другими. Старые картины и фрески скорее всего уже перешли в общественное достояние. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Laurent-Joseph Murith

Hello,

We were informed that you consider deleting the three visual documents that we registered on the new page Laurent-Joseph Murith. We do appreciate your vigilance. However, we, as Grand-Saint-Bernard hospice, museum and congregation, hold the copyright on these three images. What other information do you need?

Best regards,

Pierre Rouyer/Museum of the Grant-Saint-Bernard hospice

It's looks like reproduction of public domain work. License should be {{PD-Art}} + relevant public domain tag. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo umg new small.jpg

Hi, regarding the logo - I want to use it to illustrate the page about UMG that operates out of Ukraine. As there's also a UMG - Universal Music Group, the logo could prevent misrepresentation of the company. If the logo should be in SVG, I can re-upload it. Sorry that I made some mistakes along the way.

SVG is much better format for such images. But is this company really notable? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: UMG (former name United Minerals Group) is a leading company that invests in production of clay, dolomite, flux, trades in rare gas and microsphere (by-product of coal burning power plants). The company operates on the global market and is well-known among professionals. It has about 4 000 employees. Its profit in 2015 was $76 mln. So I wold say the company is a major employer in Ukraine and significant player in national economy. Because of that UMG is definitely notable and should have a correct logo on Wiki. At the moment, when I'm trying to re-upload a new SVG, the error is as follows: File extension ".jpg" does not match the detected MIME type of the file (image/svg+xml)." What should I do? Thanks for the answer.

Frankly, there are plenty of such companies around. .svg is correct extension for files in SVG format. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: I doubt that in Ukraine there are "plenty" of companies of this scale and area of operations. Actually only UMG trades in microsphere. Leaving that behind, Wikipedia and Wikicommons have plenty of categories for entries that have smth in common but are unique (industries, universities etc.). Some are also quite local and not all readers are familiar with them. I still believe that UMG deserves its own entry. Possibly you could guide me to notability criteria because right now it's your personal opinion against mine. Regarding the SVG, I know what the extension should be. I believe, the problem is because I want to replace .jpg with .svg; the file name states File:Logo umg new small.jpg and cannot be changed. Please, any advice re uploading the correct file and the status of this ticket? --Корректор 2014

Just upload file with new name. Word small doesn't make sense for SVG. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: The same mistake still. Do you mean that I should upload as a new entry?--Корректор 2014

Looks like you reuploading file under old name. Just upload it under new name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Uploading a new version of this file. "Destination filename: This is the name of the file you will be overwriting. You cannot modify this". The file on my PC has a new name. Destination filename remains File:Logo umg new small.jpg and I may not change it. --Корректор 2014

It means tht you reuploading file under old name. Upload new one on Special:UploadWizard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: I see. Thanks. Does it mean that this entry will be deleted as planned 7 days after June 25? And what happens if my new file is blacklisted again? Don't want to be banned because of an honest mistake(( --Корректор 2014

This file should be used in one of WMF projects. Most likely this will mean that you'll need to create article in Wikipedia and it confirm notability guidelines. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, thanks again.Корректор 2014

Deleted Poster Image for MAN VS SNAKE

Poster image that was created for our documentary film "MAN VS SNAKE: The long and Twisted Tale of Nibbler" was deleted. The poster image was created for Playland Pictures and Playland Pictures holds copyright to the art, I am the owner of Playland Pictures. Thought I had filled out the forms correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilton96 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Deleting images of Sonsón, Colombia.

Dear EugeneZelenko, reviewed your request to delete pictures I uploaded on the town of Sonsón, in the department of Antioquia in Colombia; according to the parameters indicated, I have referenced images. All public domain as they pertain to historical figures, documents about the city and symbols of the city, the citations can find them in the departmental archives of Antioquia and the Antioquia University (Web ). Cordially, ElUsuarioDesconocido. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElUsuarioDesconocido (talk • contribs) 01:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

{{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is not correct license for historical image. However, images may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

I have rectified the licenses, I used {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} and PD-Colombia, I think they are the correct licenses. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElUsuarioDesconocido (talk • contribs) 22:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Theta Xi coat of arms.png

Hi EugeneZelenko. File:Theta Xi coat of arms.png has been uploaded once again to Commons despite the warning you left at User talk:Nek1095#Please do not recreate deleted content. The file has already been tagged for speedy deletion (apparently by a bot). For reference, the uploader has posted a message on their user talk asking for clarification. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Magog the Ogre took care about this problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

deleting picture "The Swallows.pdf" user Daantje

I see the picture "The Swallows.pdf" I uploaded has been deleted. The copyright owner "Laurentius Van Acker" asked me personaly to upload the picture to wikimedia. It's him who told me that the pictures has dissapeared. He is not so happy.

here the text of his mail (in dutch):

"Danny , die foto van ons is verdwenen. Was mijn eigendom , dus rechten vrij. Heb je hem nog ??? Mvg , l.V."

What must be done in order to get the pictured republished? I can send contact info of the copyright owner. ps: I can't reach my account "Daantje" anymore, I don't know what happened, probably forgot my password.

For the 2 other pictures I will ask written permission from the wopyright holders, because also there I had explicit permission from the copyright holder to publish on wikimedia.

Danny

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:A03F:1087:3500:A906:2DDD:27C0:D696 (talk) 00:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Please ask him to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion Morgan O'Brien

Hello Eugene! I would like to know why the picture has been nominated for deletion even though it is my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonprost (talk • contribs) 14:00, 01 July 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Sudev.K.Vijay

Hi EugeneZelenko. You previously warned this editor about copyvios User talk:Sudev.K.Vijay#Copyright violations, but that does not seem to have slowed them down. It could be they just did not understand the warning, so not sure if a block is warranted right now. Maybe it will be, however, if they continue after second warning? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Probably User:Pokéfan95 didn't notice first last warning. I blocked this user. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of my works

So you deleted two of my works. I own all of the copyrights, so thank you very much. :( File:Positiivi 2011-1.jpg File:AFCC Exhibition Catalog.jpg Tvkosone (talk) 16:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please confirm ownership via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with confirmation review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

I have signed the pictures with "This is my own work" tag. It should be enough. Tvkosone (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

In case of 3rd party publication copyright ownership is not clear, so it's better to clarify via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

I am not a 3rd party. I also hate all (unnecessary) burocracy. Besides, my English isn't good enough to understand all different rules like OTRS. I'd rather quit, who cares. :( Tvkosone (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Please note that many users uploads magazine/album/book/game covers or movie posters as own work too. In such circumstances precautions are good idea. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Well, not me. And I am a photographer, not a lawyer. Less burocracy == Better world, IMHO. Tvkosone (talk) 15:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

You should participate a little bit in Commons maintenance to understand that a bureaucracy is not necessarily evil :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Diamond-Square diagrams

Hi EugeneZelenko. You requested the deletion of these files I uploaded. It's okay, I gathered them in that image and now they are unused and useless. Wattcle (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please note that w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics is better format for diagrams. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

My own pics!

Hi, the pics are my own as I have marked. What does that deletion message mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OH7HJ (talk • contribs) 15:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Tiedosto:GPS - APRS - Radio - data - sanomaserveri - Kaavio tnx Matti OH3EGY.png

Hi,

First me and then my friend tried add this pic of his but it has vanished. It is made by him and he has a copyright to it. How could we get it back?

Regards,

- Juha Hartikka

OH7HJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by OH7HJ (talk • contribs) 15:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2016-06-13-2135 - Alinco APRS-igatena - Soundmodem softana - Aerialin kaksikkodipoli antennina Pielisellä (c) OH7HJ.jpg

Hi,

You sent this message: "‪EugeneZelenko‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪File tagging File:GPS - APRS - Radio - data - sano...‬".

And also: File:Verkkovaaran Radio Mobile-softalla laskettu kantamakartta nelikkovertikaalille AV1912 - Punainen mobileasemille ja sininen kotiasemille (c) OH7HJ.jpg File:Example Wireless Network of Two X-band Simplex Repeaters to Cover North Carelia (c) OH7HJ.jpg Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

They are my very own works as I have clearly stated! What does that talk about deletion mean?

I got also messages asking me to sign these messages. I have signed them clearly with my own name:

Regards,

- Juha Hartikka -

Finland OH7HJ@hotmail.com

These images are based on map. Who created them? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear EugeneZelenko,

I see you deleted my own illustrations. And you claim that I do not have copyright to my own work..? :o Yes, they are my very own works, that I did by readers' requests especially to describe the emergency communications system of the wiki page!

Now you really did delete them..? I have clearly stated my ownership and copyright to them. In any country, written copyright marking is official and lawful. I have signed them clearly with my own name, as added with my unique international radio amateur callsign OH7HJ.

Because those illustrations are inarguably my own there must be some other reason you are deleting them? Only one that comes in mind is harassing other people's work..! Don't you really have anything useful to do except keep harming wiki contributors' work..?

Regards,

- Juha Hartikka -

OH7HJ, Finland

--OH7HJ (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of IZOT1036C.jpg

Dear Eugene, 1. Thank you for the e-mail and I am happy to discuss this picture with you. At least to write to someone ... . 2. I am the inventor of this machine - most of the patents of this machine are mine (well, except one). I was there when this picture was taken. If you go to the Bulgarian wikipedia you can read the story. https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D1%82_1036C 3. This is the only (repeat, the only) existing picture of IZOT 1036C. The magazine does not exist for more then 20 years. Actually I do not know for how many years, after the fall of communism in Bulgaria many places were closed and you know how was then - no one cared about rights, patents, intellectual property. The intellectual property was owned by the government and every could use it for free. 4. I tried to find out someone that holds the rights and I could not. In attempt to preserve what is left after the communism in Bulgaria, enthusiasts are scanning all the volumes of this magazine and I asked them. The answer was "you are the inventor, it is your right to use it, there is no one here". I will be very happy if I find someone to ask for permissions. That is why I decided to take a punt and to publish it, correctly pointing out the source of the picture. 5. To make the things worse ... I have been contacted by Denis Kusch, a collector of vintage electronics from Sankt Petersburg, who asked me about IZOT 1036C. It appeared that in Russia people are talking about IZOT 1036C, but in fact it is never sold there. In Russia has been sold IZOT 1037C rebadged as IZOT 1036C and the original IZOT 1036C (on the picture) has been quietly stopped from manufacturing. So, Denis could not help me. He took some pictures of boards for me, but from the computer itself there is no trace. 6. I contacted the factory in Veliko Turnovo. The general manager remembered the computer, but that was it. There is nothing left. The factory now is a property of a Swedish company. 7. In short, from the prospective of rights, I think I did the right thing - pointed out the source. I do not know who else to ask. However, having in mind that in communism the intellectual property was owned by the government and free to use, I will be grateful if you suggest something or an exemption is made and if someone pops up then we will deal with the matter. 8. I checked again. It seems the magazine is closed down Aug-Sept. 2002. http://knigi.tor2.org/?b=4605617

Best regards,

Venelin Barboutov 101.167.13.58 07:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Bulgaria. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene, Thank you for your advise. Article 10 entitled "Copyright over periodicals and encyclopedias" of the Bulgarian Copyright law states that the copyright over periodicals and encyclopedias belong to the publisher (in this case the magazine)and in the second sentence it is stated that the copyrights over the included parts that are literature, art and science belong to the authors. Since I am a recognized inventor of this machine and if we consider computer design as science, it seems that I have copyrights over this picture. Will you please advise further. 101.167.13.58 10:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, to photo copyrights belong to publisher or photographer. I'm not sure what you developed, but patents are usually used for intellectual property protection in industrial design. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene, what you say is true ... if the photographer claims the picture in compliance with the Bulgarian Copyright Law from 1993. The picture is taken in 1985 and it is not claimed, i.e. anonymous, there is no name of the photographer on the picture. In good faith, I sent you the link of all volumes of the magazine from 1945-2002. So, if you have a good will, you can download the volume and see by yourself. The Bulgarian Copyright Law from 1993 is not retrospective and the picture falls under the ruling of the Bulgarian Copyright Law from 1970 (this law was introduced to make the TV shows and the movies paid, before that they were for free in compliance with the Bulgarian Copyright Law from 1950). Again in good faith, I not only quote the magazine, but also apply retrospective principle by referring to article 10 of the Bulgarian Copyright Law from 1993, nevertheless it is not applicable in this case. Since the picture is not claimed, the owner is the publisher! On the top of this the publisher does not exist for 15 years ... And on the top of the top, the publisher is government owned. In compliance with article 10 the picture is art, the computer is science ... the computer is the content of the picture, and as such it becomes part of the volume. You cannot blindly apply contemporary laws to objects created in completely different legal environment. There must be a common sense ... Today, if a photographer wants to take a picture there will be a contract and the copyright will a clause in it. Back in 1985, in the eastern block there were no contracts, contracts between who - the government and the government? There were no patents, there were "авторско свидетелство". Again the government is the owner.

If you diligently want to know what IZOT 1036C is and what I developed, please read the article. I sent you the link, and you will get it if you want. To make it short, what I developed became part of the Pentium processor 8 years later (this is a fact). Did you use it? In respect to your work I will try to contact the Ministry of Telecommunications in Bulgaria. It seems this magazine has been part of its structure and let you know.101.167.13.58 01:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene, I sent an e-mail to the director of the Bulgarian Copyright Agency. Please send me an e-mail if you like to receive a copy of the correspondence. FYI, if a photographer takes a picture of you for an advertisement for a company X, then the company will ask you a signed permission and then the company will negotiate the rights with the photographer. Be sure for product adds (what actually is the picture in the argument) no copyright permissions will be given to the magazine and the photographer. This is how it is today. Back in 1985 in communism ... we will see how they will comment, if comment at all ... who knows.101.167.13.58 10:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

In many countries (including ex-USSR) changes in copyrights laws were retroactive (i. e. affected works created before date when new law will come into effect). As far as I could judge from Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Bulgaria, same was in Bulgaria (there is no special templates with Bulgarian law specific, {{PD-BG-exempt}} could not be applied to photos).

It's good idea to find out story of publisher. Its assets could be privatized (usual story in ex-USSR) or acquired by other legal entity.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene, today I had a phone conversation with George Damjanov (director of the Bulgarian Copyright Agency) regarding the picture (the contact is on this website http://mc.government.bg/page.php?p=52&s=57&sp=0&t=0&z=0). He was very polite and helpful and I guess you can contact him directly. Now, regarding the Bulgarian Copyright Law 1993 Mr. Damjanov confirmed that the law is not retrospective and cannot be applied to object taken before 1993 as it is in this case. Regarding the photo - even if we ignore that the law is not retrospective and apply it to this photo from 1985, the photo it is not a portrait and under article 13 of the law it cannot be considered as property of the photographer. The Bulgarian Copyright Law 1993 is on this website - https://bg.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%B8_%D1%81%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5_%D0%BC%D1%83_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0#.D0.94.D1.8F.D0.BB_.D1.87.D0.B5.D1.82.D0.B2.D1.8A.D1.80.D1.82.D0.B8._.D0.9F.D0.A0.D0.98.D0.9B.D0.9E.D0.96.D0.98.D0.9C_.D0.97.D0.90.D0.9A.D0.9E.D0.9D -

The article 13 is the only article discussing photography. It makes clear difference between art and photography. Under article 13, the only form of photography where the photographer has negotiable copyrights is a portrait of a human. The ownership is a matter of negotiation between the photographer and the man on the portrait. Mr. Damjanov confirmed that the magazine is closed (it is not privatized), the ministry of telecommunications is closed (reorganization), the company that manufactured the computer is closed (not privatized), the photo is anonymous (no name of the photographer), the photo is low quality, the photo is not a portrait (the photo is part of advertisement of a computer), therefore the photograph does not have commercial value and there is no problem this photo to be used for free. I believe, contacting the copyright authority in Bulgaria on the highest level, I did my very best to assist you taking informed decision. However, I guess you prefer to have something in writing and that is why I asked the Director of the Bulgarian Copyright Agency to answer my e-mail and to confirm the outcomes of our conversation. As far I receive this e-mail I will try to pass it to you (I received a postmaster e-mail to inform me my e-mail is delayed, that is why I picked up the phone and contacted Mr. George Damjanov). In the mean time please, feel free to contact him and have your own investigation, if you like. I guess you may commence the conversation in Russian or in English. If your decision is in my favor please advise how to fix the license field and what type of license you will recommend.

Finally, in all countries of the former eastern block the new copyright laws are not retrospective (it seems you are a young guy). These laws are introduced because of the computer programs. Imagine they are retrospective. Now can you imagine how many law suits should be filed for copied software products and how much money should be payed for that. Can you imagine? During the communism USSR impose reverse engineering on all eastern countries. If product was not copied from IBM or DEC the USSR did not buy it (read about Единная Система). Please, do not touch me on this matter. Please!!!!101.167.13.58 10:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 101.167.13.58 (talk) 09:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

As far as I know, copyrights laws of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine are retrospective. In Russia even twice, when it extended term of protection from 50 to 70 years.

I know situation with software in ex-USSR pretty well on my own experience :-)

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene, I think there is a misunderstanding in our discussion. All new copyright laws in the eastern block are retrospective regarding already protected items of literature and art. In other words, the period of protection is extended (with break or without a break, does not matter). From this prospective you are right and I agree with you. When I am talking retrospective I mean that the new law does not protect items with a back date - for example, the software. In the case of this discussion, the photo we discuss has not been protected before as an isolated item, because it is not a portrait of a human and obviously, it is not protected under article 13 of the new law. Hope, we came to a common ground.101.167.13.58 00:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

I understand that situation may be different in different countries, but reference to courts (especially Supreme ones) decisions is only way to find real situation.

In copyrights laws which I read, there were no segregation of photos by subject.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene,

There is no segregation by subject. I do not believe you read any legal texts. I really doubt you even read what I am writing to you. If you really do read, then read this http://www.copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf carefully to understand what segregation means in US. What is visual art and what is not. Why advertisement (what the picture in the argument is) is not art. If you read this text and go across your talk, I believe, you will get ashamed. In article 13 of the Bulgarian Copyright Law clearly has a segregation by object. This photo is under the ruling of the Bulgarian Copyright law not under the Russian or American law. Why the Russian and the American Copyright laws are irrelevant in this case, please read the Bern Convention and the Universal convention. Because I do not believe you read any legal texts, I will translate for you article 13 of the Bulgarian Copyright law - article 13 states "The copyright over art or photography, that depicts another person belongs to the author of the art. The author and the depicted person may negotiate the condition of usage of the art." In the law there is no other article regarding photography. The law is logical matter. Why is the second sentence added to the article? The protect the human rights of the depicted person. In other words defense from "paparatzi". Now, imagine you and your friend go to the park for a walk. You see a beautiful tree and take a picture. From the same spot your friend takes a picture too. The two pictures are the same - the differences are minor. Is this picture protected under copyright law - no. Because of the equal opportunity principle. In my case the picture itself is not protected by the law (like the tree), the volume of the magazine is. The magazine is closed, the ministry is closed the whole computer industry is wiped off (for 6 months in 1990). On the top of this the law is not retrospective. In other words, thing that have not been protected in 1985, stay unprotected by the law from 1993. This retrospective principle has not been discussed in the Russian Duma and in this sense the Russian or which ever Copyright law are not retrospective. What is discussed, is the term of protection of art and literature with or without break (regarding the 15 years protection). In other words to restore with back date the protection of art and literature with elapsed old term of protection (15 years) less the +70 years. I believe, this approach is the right thing to do. The law is not a dogma. See these two picture. The pictures are pretty much the same. The only difference - the second one is a USSR theft. Is that right? :)))

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=t1100+plus&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=np&tbm=isch&imgil=GR02hSag53jvQM%253A%253BtPolay1zSmL3gM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fgordogato.com%25252Foscommerce%25252Fcatalog%25252Fproduct_info.php%25253Fproducts_id%2525253D624&source=iu&pf=m&fir=GR02hSag53jvQM%253A%252CtPolay1zSmL3gM%252C_&usg=__tvx3Y_KmzKA3WzN8U_drVHUBhqw%3D&biw=1920&bih=942&ved=0ahUKEwi087ruxIDOAhWCGZQKHR8HAn4QyjcIXw&ei=g6SOV_SlO4Kz0ASfjojwBw#imgrc=O0D9Q0wga4fgpM%3A

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=%D0%9C%D0%A1+1504&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=np&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjR8cfRxoDOAhUGNpQKHeGsCP4QsAQIJQ&biw=1920&bih=946#imgrc=W7neL2_GFVT-BM%3A

You suggest supreme court as a "solution". Without a plaintiff, without a complaint, without court procedure!?!?!?! That is why I think you are a young guy (only a youngster may suggest that :))) ). You have been given everything to make an informed decision. We are writing "Война и Мир" for nonsense - some wikipedia phantasies. (What if ... what if you kiss Alla Pugachova ... well, I think she will be on the moon.  :))) ) I support my argument with articles from the Bulgarian Copyright Law. I am not interested in Russian or American Copyright law. Eugene, in the end, do whatever you want ... if you want to delete the picture, delete it ... if you want to keep the picture, keep it ... if you want to resolve the matter permanently, resolve it ... somehow. Hope, you do not get this offensive. However, this sort of expertise is too much for me. Vebar (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

In Belarusian/Russian/Ukranian (and likely other ex-USSR countries) only photos are mentioned, and all of them had same term of protection. Retroactivity means that past works are protected in same way as works created after law come into affect. In this respect ex-USSR laws are different from USA one. In case of Russia, Supreme Court clarified that changes of terms of protection from 50 to 70 years are retroactive, so what was public domain, became copyrighted again. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

We are talking Bulgaria (it is not ex-USSR). US/Russia/Belarus/Ukraine/Birma and anything else is irrelevant. The laws are different and you have to learn something different, something new. Publishing this photo on the Bulgarian wikipedia does not break the Bulgarian Copyright Law. The photo is unsigned, advertisement, not a portrait, not a visual art, no existent owner (the magazine is closed, the ministry is closed, the industry is wiped off), the Director of the Bulgarian Copyright Agency confirmed the photo is public property (not protected). And you proceed to insist what is in Belarus. Do I talk to a priest or to a wall? 101.167.13.58 20:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Lets talk Belarus "ЗАКОН РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ 17 мая 2011 г. № 262-З Об авторском праве и смежных правах"

Статья 8/2 states "При отсутствии доказательств иного автором произведения считается лицо, указанное в качестве автора на оригинале или экземпляре произведения (презумпция авторства)". Do you know what means "или экземпляре произведения"? Legal back door theft - if you find a anonymous photo you can claim it, i.e. you can put your name on "экземпляре произведения". In other words in Belarus copyright theft of anonymous art is legal.

Further Статья 8/3 "При опубликовании произведения без обозначения имени (анонимно) или под вымышленным именем (псевдонимом), за исключением случая, когда псевдоним автора не оставляет сомнения в его личности, издатель, имя или наименование которого обозначены на этом произведении, при отсутствии доказательств иного считается представителем автора в соответствии с настоящим Законом и в этом качестве имеет право защищать права автора и обеспечивать их осуществление." This means that according to the Belarus law the magazine is representative of the author. With some fine details (the representative does not have the same rights as the owner) this matches the Bulgarian law.

Further Статья 12/2 "После ликвидации юридического лица – производителя аудиовизуального произведения, а также в случае смерти физического лица – производителя аудиовизуального произведения при отсутствии у него наследников исключительное право на аудиовизуальное произведение автоматически переходит к его авторам, в случае смерти авторов – к их наследникам в порядке, установленном законодательными актами Республики Беларусь." The magazine is closed, the photo anonymous, there are no successors and what in Belarus will do? Lawfully steel the copyright in compliance with Cтатья 8/2 - claim property and do not show the source (who will prove you are not the author, the magazine is just representative and it is liquidated, and suddenly you are the author). Well in the west and in Bulgaria it becomes public property.

The whole Статья 35 legalizes pirate copies for personal use. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 101.167.13.58 (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Eugene, that is why I believe that you do not read legal texts, or if you read them you do not understand them. That is what I believe. 101.167.13.58 22:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your examples are not very relevant. See article 5 (objects of copyrights law), article 20 (terms of protection) and article 21 (public domain). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The case is "ликвидация юридического лица" ... Статья 12/2 ... no successor ... you again proved my point ... you do not get it. Read Bulgarian Law. Belarus is irrelevant!!! Capish? 101.167.13.58 19:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

As I wrote in very beginning, entities may not disappear. Assets could be purchased (prvitized) by other entities. --EugeneZelenko (talk ) 13:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

The assets are not privatized, they are liquidated (ликвидация юридического лица) and because the photo is anonymous there are no successors ("наследники"). There has been no sale. This is a fact, checked in the Bulgarian Copyright agency. The contacts have been submitted to you and you are lazy to check. In the "rules by territory" you have a very, very rudimentary template that is more misleading then helpful. 101.167.13.58 02:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

We both express opinions what was happens with photographer and publisher. See also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Worst scenario should be considered. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

You express opinions (you have very inventive understanding of the law). I express checked fact. In good will I submitted to you the contact to check, you refused to check the facts, too hard to do.101.167.13.58 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Now, regarding your fantastic claim that the Belorussian Copyright law is retrospective ... In Статья 21/1 is written "Произведения, которым на территории Республики Беларусь охрана никогда не предоставлялась, также считаются перешедшими в общественное достояние." ... so, something created before the date of this law and not protected by the previous law (охрана никогда не предоставлялась) stay in the public domain. Can you explain why this sentence is in? I want to see how brave and honest you are. So retrospectivity in ex-USSR countries has two view points - first one is this one and the law is not retrospective and the second is restoring protection of literature and art, protected from the previous law with expired period of protection (previous +15) less then +50 and later +70 (to my opinion this fair). So, please do not keep talking bulshit. I do not stand bulshit artists.

Lets close this discussion, since looks like we don't understand each other and arguments started to be repeated. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Agree, it is not worth talking to you. I understand you and understand the responsibility of the administrator, but a man on your age to demonstrate such rudimentary level of legal knowledge and to generated so much nonsense is disturbing.101.167.13.58 02:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Max Brenner Boycott Poster.jpg‬

Dear Eugene,

Thank you for your hostile deletion request. I made clear that I created this work. I will not be emailing proof of my licence over this work because I do not wish to have my personal information banded about in this forum. I hope you are happy in your work. You are making the commons a better place by enforcing these Byzantine regulations.

Best Regards, Darryl Kerrigan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darryl Kerrigan (talk • contribs) 16:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

You photo is Commons:Derivative works from poster made by 3rd party, who should provide permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of TortoiseGit_logo.svg

Dear Eugene, why was that image finally deleted? After your message I added all required license/permission details which got lost after updating the image... --MrTux (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

I didn't delete image, but my guess is that it was still claimed to be screenshot. Could you please provide link to overall code license statement? Just to make sure that logo is covered by GPL too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

I provided a link and a statement about the license in the image description, however, it got deleted anyway. The repository is https://gitlab.com/tortoisegit/tortoisegit/tree/master and the image is also inside that repository. --MrTux (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of CCTO Image Files

Hi Eugene- The files I uploaded (CCTO-HighRes.tif and CCTO.tif) were not the size/specs that I needed and are not useful. They were tagged for deletion. How do I go about deleting them?

Regards, Jtangosu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtangosu (talk • contribs) 01:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

I nominted them for deletion, so should be deleted ~ week after nomination. If it's possible, please consider to create such images in w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics format. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mo_Lam_-_Hans_Nayna.webm

Tks for your remarks, the authorisation has been sent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damsb (talk • contribs) 06:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Russia-Moscow-Moscow State University.jpg

File:Russia-Moscow-Moscow State University.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Bn chile.jpg

Link File:Bn chile.jpg

 Keep This work it is clearly free of copyright according to Chile's law (more than 50 years after the death of the author)

for its government signed the Berna agreement of 5-jun-1975

--Mcapdevila (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Sure, but problem was in original license and claim of own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

imagen club temuco

hay una imagen de club deportes temuco que solo se reemplazo,pero es la misma solo que esta es la version a color de aquella. como puedes hacer para que no sea retirada ni borrada? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A5bd64c9c5257c3c9f5958c44eb97d9a_Temuco_61.png --Dominacion (talk) 03:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( At first you need to provide correct source information and license for file. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Image deletion Blind love.jpeg

Please suggest me the appropriate summary legend for uploading facebook photo shared publicly. Inderdeepkaur2006 (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

You could not upload such photos unless they clearly marked as freely licensed or you got permission from copyrights owner. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Image deletion Yasirshah.jpeg

Suggest me the appropriate licensing for uploading photos which are under public domain and one can use it anywhere. Inderdeepkaur2006 (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

These photos seems to be promo one and movie screenshot. I highly doubt that they are in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

File:SSMSVD036128S.jpg

You should readd this image. It has one of the kinds of licenses which is allowed, which was clearly stated. Dammråtta (talk) 23:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please read source site and Commons:Licensing carefully. Non-commercial versions of Creative Commons are not allowed here. You should investigate if this image is in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Is EugeneZelenko Harassing Copyright Owners by Deleting Wiki Article Images Randomly?

Dear EugeneZelenko,

I see you deleted my own illustrations. And you claim that I do not have copyright to my own work..? :o Yes, they are my very own works, that I did by readers' requests especially to describe the emergency communications system of the wiki page!

Now you really did delete them..? I have clearly stated my ownership and copyright to them. In any country, written copyright marking is official and lawful. I have signed them clearly with my own name, as added with my unique international radio amateur callsign OH7HJ.

Because those illustrations are inarguably my own there must be some other reason you are deleting them? Only one that comes in mind is harassing other people's work..! Don't you really have anything useful to do except keep harming wiki contributors' work..?

Regards,

- Juha Hartikka -

OH7HJ Finland --OH7HJ (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)--OH7HJ (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)--OH7HJ (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)--OH7HJ (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)--OH7HJ (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)--OH7HJ (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by OH7HJ (talk • contribs) 20:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I explained reasons for my doubts. Other person with Finnish knowledge provide more explanations.

Please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle to understand my and other Commons maintainers logic.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Lusta logo.jpg

Dear Eugene, The "Lusta logo.jpg" is an image of LUSTA trademark. I found in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law that trademarks can be used. Is there any other problem with this file? Tnx, Kristina — Preceding unsigned comment added by KristinaLupa (talk • contribs) 23:51, 02 August 2016 (UTC)

--KristinaLupa (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)== Lupa images nominated for deletion ==

Dear Eugene, You have nominated the "Lupa Fashion House.gif", "Baccarat - shearling coat.jpg" and "Shearling jacket.jpg" files for deletion as "Advertisement and non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s)." I am not sure what does it mean. These photos were taken by me, and the image was created by me as well. How can I prove it? What permissions are missing? Tnx, Kristina — Preceding unsigned comment added by KristinaLupa (talk • contribs) 00:08, 03 August 2016 (UTC)

Logo is not trivial, so it may have copyrights restrictions.

Regular process for dealing with logos and advertisement is sending permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion.

Other problem with your images is how they fit Commons:Project scope?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of "PublikationenWolfgangWieland"

The document contains a complete overview of the publications of Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Wieland. As Wikipedia doesn't allow to list them all in the text section (too long), it is quite useful to have a complete overview in a handy and printable pdf format. I am the copyright owner myself. Are there any objections to have the document published? Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.136.105.191 (talk) 14:18, 04 August 2016 (UTC)

You could create subpage of article for this purpose. Anyway, it'll be much easier to maintain wiki-text up-to-date. Web link in article is other solution. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Jacob Lofland photo

Hey, apparently this photo is missing evidence of permission - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacob_Lofland.jpg It seems to be a publicity photo and is his IMDB main photo... is that good enough? 2.102.187.157 12:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

It's necessary to provide link to place where this photo is claimed to be released under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} by photographer/copyrights owner or such permission should be send to Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Does the IMDB have to do the same? Would they have this info somewhere? 2.102.187.157 13:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I could not comment about IMDB copyright policies and their enforcement. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

The deletion of File:Plus Manchukuo National Anthem 1933-1942 Chinese.ogv

I would like you to know that that file with the video was uploaded by accident (also glitchy) which is why I uploaded File:Manchukuo National Anthem 1933-1942 Chinese Korean.ogg after converting it to a .ogg file minus the video. Enterprise599 (talk) 16:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion requests/File:Els segadors.jpg

Could you check the Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Els_segadors.jpg and close the case if you you agree with the exposed facts? Thanks..--Mcapdevila (talk) 07:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Could you please add dates of life of painter? There is no article in Wikipedia to see them. Please also remove text from permission field. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Deleted logo

I was assigned to make/edit the psau pages do you want the president to be the one who will upload the logo. Well I out. Try to make a better job next time Kd.Cabrera (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

University official should send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. Or you could upload this logo to project which allows fair use content, like English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Affected: File:Time by HrPayman.jpg And also: File:Hamidreza payman.jpg

hello dear EugeneZelenko Affected: File:Time by HrPayman.jpg And also: File:Hamidreza payman.jpg I am writing in response to your comment in order to provide you with certainty that the photos belong to Hamidreza Payman, to be sure. Furthermore, the original photos are available to be referenced.

Yours sincerely --Farhangname1395 (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Please ask artist to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko We have sent the email but there is no answer please lead me because the pictures are deleted

Did you mean permission letter to OTRS? Then please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko I wrote the help request on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard but there is no feedback --Farhangname1395 (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

You could try to find OTRS volunteer who spoke language which was used on permission and contact him/her directly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

About Copyright permission- File:Philippine-gold 04c.jpg

Eugene, this image with authors and sources is included when its uploaded here, the image was a public domain, the copyright have no restrictions on using it , I think i should add a public domain for non-owned image or should i still ask permission for the usage of the image, (first time contributor, not yet aware of various aspects of copyrights). (JournalmanManila (talk))

Where photo's license statement could be found? Please note that public domain and Creative Commons are different terms. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Andra Day

I re-uploaded this file -File:Andra Day photo WMG.jpg. Permission was already sent and received ticket #2016072710001683. I noted this on the new upload. --NoNewsGoodNews (talk) 18:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

File:MAGALLANES LOGO.png

Hi EugeneZelenko. You just speedied File:MAGALLANES LOGO.png, but the page has been recreated by the uploader only there's no file. On Wikipedia, that would be tagged for speedy deletion per en:WP:F2, but I'm not sure what is done on Commons. Speedy deletion per G8? -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for notice! I deleted page.

I think you could use {{Speedydelete}} with reason like misused page in File namespace.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks EugeneZelenko. Would you mind taking a look at the comments made at User talk:KatorseNiAmang‎#File:MAGALLANES LOGO.png? If what I posted is incorrect, then please post the correct information that this editor needs so that they have a better idea why the file was deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Ряд фотоснимков.

По ссылке список https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Botanicue#Files_uploaded_by_Botanicue_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs.29

Здравствуйте. К сожалению, установить авторство не представляется возможным, большая часть снимков - превью продавцов с интернет-аукционов, много лет передававшиеся по сети интернет. Военным фото - 75 лет со дня создания, немецкие, сделаны на территории СССР в годы фашистской оккупации. Поисковики не могут предоставить похожие изображения с указанием авторства. Часть снимков - из музея 289-й школы Петербурга, там тоже авторов снимков не знают.

Некоторые снимки ошибочные или дублированные, я не сразу понял как тут работает всё.

Удалите все снимки из списка через 3 дня,в т.ч. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B8_%22%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%22_%D1%81_3_%D0%BF%D0%BE_7_%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F,_%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%80%D1%85%D1%83_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B3.%D0%9A%D0%B8%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%84..jpg?uselang=ru

За это время я перезагружу их в соответствии с "добросовестным использованием".

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Botanicue (talk • contribs) 20:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Возможно, что анонимные работы уже перешли в общественное достояние, но надо знать хотя бы приблизительную дату создания. Смотрите Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Кроме того, лицензий Creative Commons в то время не существовало. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Airbus vs Boeing - Commercial airliners still in operation

All these Airliners Census have been posted online at some point in the past. For some reason, they are not available anymore or they have been moved to an unkonw place but, I was able to save them. All years, except for the ones I put recently, are available to the public. The references I added were posted by flightglobal so anyone could have access to it. I don't see why they should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alainmoscoso (talk • contribs) 12:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

You need to get publisher permission in Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Please review deletion request

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:CopperheadOS_homescreen.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlelliss (talk • contribs) 15:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

I think will be good idea if it'll be closed by other person. Just to have more eyes for review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Images for deletion

Hi, I have uploaded several images recently and some are marked for deletion. I can confirm that I have either taken the images myself of have been granted the right to make them available. I'm not sure what proof I can provide (especially for those I've taken myself)! One image includes a collage of covers of singles by a musician - this may have copyright issues, although since I created the collage I'm not sure. I'm happy to delete that image but am not sure how to do so. Would much appreciate any guidance! Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anne mcivor 2 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

You could upload photos in original resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Clarification about photos that I uploaded, nominated for deletion

Hi EugeneZelenko,

Hope this finds you well.

I would like to clarify that I got these photos from the family of Mr. Mahmoud Abo El Leil, who was a former minster and an Egyptiin lawyer. I created the arabic version of his page (https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%A3%D8%A8%D9%88_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84) and I appreciate your understanding in keeping the photos.

Thank you for your understanding and looking forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedsahhar (talk • contribs) 22:19, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Ahmedsahhar (talk)Ahmedsahhar

This collection looks like mix of official and private photos. You need to find out date of creation/publication/photographer information to find out if some of them in public domain (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Egypt. You need to get permission from author/copyright holder for photos which are not in public domain. See Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Images on Shane Balkowitsch

Permissions were sent to the address noted in your message from the author of the images as per your instructions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjf5280 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)