User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2017-2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque de l'inauguration de la poste de Miribel (Ain) en 1985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Stade Grégory-Coupet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museum of Ancient Greek Technology Sign.JPG

File:Museum of Ancient Greek Technology Sign.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Portrait de Roger Walkowiak (2008).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait de Roger Walkowiak (2008).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incivilité

je n'apprécie pas votre usage de termes comme "petite susceptibilité". Je vous demande de stopper cette discussion. Ceci est un avertissement. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Le respect de la liberté d'expression ne semble pas votre fort. Celui du confort de votre - peut être - (soyons prudent) petite susceptibilité sans doute plus. Je ne suis pas persuadé cela dit que ceci soit tellement inscrit dans les attributions de votre fonction administrative. Ceci n'est pas un avertissement. --Benoît Prieur (d) 22:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vous avez raison d'etre prudent, et vous avez tort de ne pas considérer mon avertissement comme un avertissement, car c'en est bien. Votre considération n'engage que vous et vos actes n'engagent que votre responsabilité. Reponsabilité qu'il faudra assumer si vous ne suivez pas mon avertissement. Je vous laisse tranquille, je n'ai rien contre vous ni ne vous ai rien demandé. Pour ma part cette histoire est close. Mais si vous venez dans ma page de discussion, encore une fois, dans le but d'etre déagréable, alors vous en subirez les conséquences. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je trouve assez consternant d'envisager les outils d'administration comme support à des menaces allusives dès l'instant que vous vous sentez froissé. On peut se sentir froissé à tort et chacun à le droit ici d'être critique quant au fonctionnement général. Pour ma part, je considère à présent que vous n'avez pas compris l'esprit des outils dont vous êtes dépositaire et qu'à ce titre vous les dévoyez. Je me sens pour ma part froissé voire insulté par votre message dont le caractère intimidant est incontestable, je ne demande pas pour autant votre blocage. Je serai toutefois attentif dorénavant à votre façon d'interagir avec les autres et vous demande de reconsidérer la façon dont vous intervenez avec cette casquette d'administrateur auprès des autres. Un administrateur n'est pas un super-utilisateur et n'est de plus pas censé menacer les autres de blocage dès l'instant qu'il s'est senti froissé...Mais si vous venez dans ma page de discussion, encore une fois, dans le but d'etre déagréable, alors vous en subirez les conséquences. étant une phrase particulièrement inappropriée dans le contexte d'un projet collaboratif surtout de la part de quelqu'un muni d'outils pour le protéger.

Je suis triste pour vous. --Benoît Prieur (d) 07:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Your Rainbow Panorama

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Colin (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Benoit

Un mot pour signaler Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts Aranc 01.jpg. C'est quoi cette offensive anti-monuments aux morts? Bonne journée et à plus.--Classiccardinal (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oui vu. C'est usant. J'ai mis un mot à Yann également.

Reste calme et tranquille. Je ne doute pas que le bon sens l'emportera en douceur.

Bises, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pénible et chronophage : et celle-là, tu l'as vue: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mairie Pont Ain 2.jpg? A ce rythme, il va pas nous rester grand chose. --Classiccardinal (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ben oui, tu l'as vue.

Je pense que cela pourrait presque évoquer du harcèlement quand on considère la pdd de Chabe. Le problème est toutefois un peu confus : les affiches électorales sont très probablement à supprimer. Par contre le reste (mairie, monument aux morts etc. probablement pas). Mais il est assez évident pour moi à présent qu'il y a une volonté de nuire à certains contributeurs. J'espère que les responsabilités adhoc seront endossées et que les contenus comme les contributeurs seront protégés en conformité avec le cadre du droit d'auteur.

Bien à toi, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: après Chabe01 et Classic, c'est à présent moi qui suis visé....

{[1], [2] --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mesquin... --Classiccardinal (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui, on a à faire à un professionnel...

affiches électorales 2017

Bonjour, Un utilisateur tatillon a l'air bien parti pour demander la suppression de toutes les photos d'affiches électorales de la dernière campagne présidentielle. Il a l'air d'avoir aussi une vision erronnée de la liberté de panorama (il voudrait en gros supprimer tous les immeubles photographiés en France). Sur ce dernier point je lui ai répondu sur plusieurs demandes de suppression mais qu'en est-il exactement pour les affiches électorales ? (par exemple ici) Merci d'avance. Culex (talk) 09:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Culex:

Pour moi les limites d'une part de la désorganisation pour un motif personnelle et d'autre part, plus grave d'une dérive s'apparentant de plus en plus à du harcèlement (critiques et attaques incessantes, et souvent gratuites, sources de stress, d'énervement, de mal-être) sont largement dépassées.

Je vous remercie de votre sollicitude et m'étonne de l'indulgence accordée ici à ce type de "contributeurs".

Cordialement, --Benoît Prieur (d) 09:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Culex,

On ne peut pas importer d'images quand les affiches sont le sujet principal de la photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, merci, dommage mais ça semble logique. Culex (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheminée de la Schappe

Salut Benoît. Je te tiens au jus au cas ou: la démolition serait prévue pour mercredi, mais c'est pas sûr-sûr. Bonne journée. --Classiccardinal (talk) 07:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cassis - France - May 2017 (24).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Clément - Barrot - Lévigne - Bourdarias cours Lafayette à Lyon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menu du jour d'un restaurant asiatique lyonnais en 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque maison Raymond Boisse - Piolenc - France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borne hectométrique à la gare de Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

lov

Hbibi Mimto (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col du Moulin à Vent - Lyas (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ça parait de bonne qualité pour moi. -- Ikan Kekek 09:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Disney Land Paris - 2017 (1).JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mégotier - cendrier au sol devant l'entrée de la gare de Marne-la-Vallée – Chessy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak Support. Photo could have been sharper.--Famberhorst 15:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Disney Land Paris - 2017 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Joseph Mouth (Camp Didier) à Sathonay Camp.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guédelon - mai 2014 - 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap Coda Cavallo - 2017 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Veilleur de Pierre - signature.jpg

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue de Komitas à Erevan.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Siège d'Etchmiadzin 2017 - 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Above very tight cut, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-07-26 - Stepanakert (Artsakh) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Whole stadium in one picture, well done --Michielverbeek 05:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:We Are Our Mountains - 2017 - 7.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! We Are Our Mountains - 2017 - 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:We Are Our Mountains - 2017 - 5.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! We Are Our Mountains - 2017 - 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good enough for QI.--Peulle 06:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crab_Da_Zha

Category:Crab_Da_Zha has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 11:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Divers Arménie - voyage vers le Karabagh - 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality--Capricorn4049 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Checkpoint Armenia-Artsakh (north road Vardenis-Mardakert).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Une petite demande

Salut Benoit Prieur, je suis un des participants de concours wiki aime les monuments et j'ai vu que tu as de tres bon photos et j'ai vu aussi que tu as bien fait ta page d'accueil. Peut-tu m'aider de faire une chose sur ma page d'accueil que j'ai pas compris: comment faire compter mes images de qualité en ce truc là: User QI|category=Quality images by ? Merci d'avance. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Armenak Margarian: Salut

,

C'est fait via cette catégorie. Le nombre d'images de la catégorie s'affiche sur ta page utilisateur à présent.

Bien à toi, --Benoît Prieur (d) 07:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cher ami, merci beaucoup.

--Armenak Margarian (talk) 08:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poste-frontière Arménie-Karabagh sur la route Vardenis-Mardakert.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancien cimetière de Courbevoie (Hauts-de-Seine, France) - 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image de Courbevoie (Hauts-de-Seine, France) en octobre 2017 - 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image de Courbevoie (Hauts-de-Seine, France) en octobre 2017 - 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:39, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi supprimer la traduction ?

Bonjour,

Je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous avez supprimé les deux traductions de ces catégories [3] et [4]. Elles peuvent être utiles pour les francophones qui ne maitrisent pas ou mal l'anglais.

Lionel Allorge (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Oui effectivement ; c'est corrigé.

--Benoît Prieur (d) 17:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque pompe à incendie (Villefranche-sur-Saône, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please fix the perspective, let all borders of the sign parallel to the image borders. --Basotxerri 19:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Done --Benoît Prieur 19:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup! Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Clavé

Hi Benoît Prieur, I noticed File:Les guerriers aux points cardinels - Antonio Clavé - Madrid airport.jpg and File:Vista de Toledo - Javier Clavo - Madrid airport.jpg. Both are paintings by Antoni Clavé who died in 2005 so I don't these files are free yet. What do you think? Multichill (talk) 12:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Multichill: :)

These paintings are in the public space (airport) so according the spanish freedom of panorama I was thinking that it was ok (like sculptures from this Category:Art in Madrid-Barajas Airport).

Regards, --Benoît Prieur (d) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure it applies, but I'll leave it to someone else to challenge it if they think it's not covered by FOP. You might want to add {{FoP-Spain}} to them. Multichill (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a specialist of the question so if these pictures must be deleted no pb from my side. --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Benoît Prieur, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 09:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Félicitations Benoît :) — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 10:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd and Dyolf77: Thanks a lot!

--Benoît Prieur (d) 12:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Artix Kreiger:

Thank you.. --Benoît Prieur (d) 20:45, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and welcome to the janitor service! Green Giant (talk) 02:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Green Giant: Thank you!

. --Benoît Prieur (d) 06:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correction de l'orthographe du mot Baoulé

Hello Benoît Prieur, Je me suis permise de reformuler le nom de la langue. Vous avez surement pas bien compris quand je vous ai donné le nom de mon ethnie lors de l’enregistrement à Wiki Indaba 2018. J‘espère que vous n’y voyez aucun inconvénient .--Modjou (talk) 02:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Modjou: Coucou,

Oui, mille mercis. Je me suis trompé dans le nommage des fichiers (envoyés sur Commons en une seule fois, donc si je me trompe une fois, je me trompe dix fois). J'avais utilisé la bonne orthographe dans la cible, pour l'instant sur fr.wikt https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Beno%C3%AEt_Prieur/Mots_essentiels/baoul%C3%A9 A propos si vous voulez venir contribuer sur ce projet en Baoulé ou dans une autre langue, vous êtes la bienvenue

.

Merci encore pour la correction et pour le temps accordé à Tunis. Vous êtes bien rentrée ? --Benoît Prieur (d) 04:46, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok merci @Benoît Prieur: --Modjou (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

oui nous sommes bien rentrés j'espere que vous aussi? --Modjou (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Benoît (et salut Modjou), je m’immisce dans votre conversation. En plus du mauvais nommage des fichiers, je pense aussi que les catégories ne sont pas bien nommés, du moins si on veut garder le même schéma de nommage que les autres catégories qui contiennent des prononciations audios (voir French pronunciation par exemple). J'ai commencé avec Pronunciation in baoulé language mais je ne sais pas s'il existe un outil pour changer le nom de la catégorie sur chaque fichier appartenant à la catégorie sans devoir le faire à la main. Pamputt (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Génération

Bonjour Benoît Prieur. Je viens de découvrir la Liste des œuvres d'art de l'Ain,dont vous êtes un important contributeur. Je possède des photos de Génération, Hommage à Saint-Exupéry, mais sont-elles admissibles sur Commons???. je voulais vous le demander sur Wikipédia, mais je ne comprend pas comment écrire un message là-bas.--Cocollector (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

le créateur Maxime Descombin étant mort en 2003 on ne peut - compte tenu de la loi sur le droit d'auteur - téléverser une photo de ses œuvres ici avant un moment (2073...). Donc impossible sur Wikipédia comme sur Commons.

Désolé. --Benoît Prieur (d) 09:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Je comprends ce point de vue. Mais si l’œuvre n'est pas le centre de la photo, ou en arrière plan, par exemple, ou en ombre chinoise; c'est toujours défendu?--Cocollector (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque maison natale du Capitaine Coignet à Druyes-les-Belles-Fontaines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect but close enough --Daniel Case 02:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Mohandas K. Gandhi in Geneva - 10.JPG

Hi Benoit, please add the name of the sculptor to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Túrelio:

.

Done. --Benoît Prieur (d) 12:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Benoît. I saw that you've removed {{Wikidata Infobox}} from some categories, like Category:Hare on Bell on Portland Stone Piers (Barry Flanagan), but added it to others, like Category:Gendrd I & II (Barry Flanagan). I'd appreciate any feedback you have on how the template is working in these different cases - and if there are cases where we shouldn't be using the infobox, how to identify those so the bot can avoid adding the infobox back to those categories. Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

,

For Category:Hare on Bell on Portland Stone Piers (Barry Flanagan) I just forgot a "}" [5] but I added also added the infobox to this category (after having created the wikidata). For the moment I find the infobox useful in every situation and there is no case where I prefer to avoid to use it.

Regards, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, great. :-) Let me know if you spot any issues, or want any additional info from Wikidata adding to the infobox! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice-de-Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost - clocher vue ouest (2018).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Un cinéma à Disney Village (4 DX).JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière militaire allemand de Dagneux (2018) - 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sundial of the Saint-Maurice church (Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue de la Rue Hippolyte Doury à Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe to crop the sky a little bit? Btw good quality, Tournasol7 14:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC) - @Tournasol7: Crop Done. Thank you :) --Benoît Prieur 14:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Montluel

Salut,

La catégorie Hôtel de Condé de Montluel réfère à l'Hôtel de Condé de Montluel qui est bien l'aggrégation de ces trois monuments.

Idéalement et en toute logique il faudrait laisser les trois notices :

Première notice
Deuxième notice
Troisième notice

--Benoît (d) 05:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS : je lis une question juste au-dessus. Je partage le même étonnement.

Avoue que les fiches Mérimée ne sont pas très claires, sur le sujet. Pourquoi faire 3 dossiers de protections, alors ?! Encore in mystère de la base, qui est certes pleine de confusion ... auquel cas, je mets les 3 notices sur Wikidata. Marianne Casamance (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marianne Casamance:

Elle ne sont pas très clair certes. Elles sont également sans objet. Le 71 de la rue est un resto chinois situé à bien 800 mètres du 303 de la même rue où se situe cet hôtel particulier. La numérotation a changé et a même été inversé depuis 1982 (le 1 part du côté opposé à ce qui se faisait alors).

J'ai créé un wikidata regroupant les trois notices ce qui est effectivement plus logique [6]. Par contre, je suggère de laisser les trois notices dans la catégorie. L'adressage n'a plus de sens et à l'époque il y a eu une notice pour l'aile gauche, une pour la façade centrale, une pour l'aile droite. ::Je laisserai bien les trois notices plus à fin d'information et de clarté, que de pure logique. Je te l'accorde.

Bonne journée

.

--Benoît (d) 06:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok merci Marianne Casamance (talk) 06:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niche contenant une statuette de la Vierge à l'Enfant, Via XX Settembre, Alghero, Sardinia - vue drone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Thanks for the explanation for the tilt! --Daniel Case 17:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Concours cantonal de labour - Boissia 2018 - 0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brouettes à Charchilla (Jura, France) en juillet 2018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vues aériennes

Bonjour, j'ai vu dans tes téléchargements que tu utilise un drone pour faire des photos aériennes. Attention en France l'utilisation de drone meme pour le loisir est réglementé, surtout au dessus des espaces habités, je ne suis pas un spécialiste mais je ne pense pas que ce soit OK pour la législation française, je te dis cela juste pour que tu ne t'attires pas d'ennui, car les amandes peuvent etre chères. Cela dit tu fais ce que tu veux. Voici quelques liens : "quelles règles respecter?", "La réglementation", Carte des restrictions pour les drones de loisis et bien d'autres.... Cordialement, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coucou @Christian Ferrer:

Merci pour les liens que pour certains je ne connaissais pas. Effectivement, il faut être prudent. Je vais passer le nouveau certificat professionnel (en vigueur depuis début juillet) dès qu'il y aura des dates d'examen près de chez moi. Ensuite je vais sans doute plutôt m'orienter vers des prises de vue de la nature et je ferai des demandes d'autorisation pour les zones habitées.

Merci pour les infos fournies. A bientôt,

----Benoît (d) 11:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! French Enduro Championship 2018 (4th stage) - 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Pretty good for an iPhone pic --Daniel Case 19:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Dominique Mayet à Pratz (Jura).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO the green lines should be vertical and horizontal. --XRay 15:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Done I tried to fix the perspective. --Benoît Prieur 13:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monument_aux_morts_de_la_Résistance_(Privas)

Category:Monument_aux_morts_de_la_Résistance_(Privas) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

90.43.152.31 14:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

J'utilise une de tes photos :)

Salut Benoît, seulement un bref message pour dire que j'utiliserai cette photo -et peut-être que des autres- pour une de mes sessions d'architecture contemporaine à l'Université, ou je parlerai de les salines d'Arc-et-Senans. Merci pour partager tes photos, elles me sont vraiment utiles! ESM (talk) 16:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ESM: Bonjour :) et merci du signalement. C'est toujours un plaisir de savoir que les photos uploadées sur Commons sont utilisées dans d'autres contextes que Wikipédia (ce qui est déjà super). Vive la licence libre ! Et bon courage pour les cours. ----Benoît (d) 16:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Première maraude "Un café, des sourires" du dimanche matin - 4.jpg

File:Première maraude "Un café, des sourires" du dimanche matin - 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Médaillon (maternité) rue Aram à Erevan, Arménie.JPG

Not disputing that you took the photograph, but it would be useful if you could add some information on the sculptor of the architectural detail shown as well. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commissariat de secteur du 8e arrondissement de Lyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commissariat de secteur du 8e arrondissement de Lyon - plaque Robert Coutenceau - gros plan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2017-2018

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

File tagging File:Portrait de Roger Walkowiak (2008).jpg

Incivilité

Salut Benoit

affiches électorales 2017

Cheminée de la Schappe

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Some baklava for you!

Quality Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Une petite demande

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Pourquoi supprimer la traduction ?

Quality Image Promotion

Antonio Clavé

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Correction de l'orthographe du mot Baoulé

Génération

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Quality Image Promotion

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Quality Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Montluel

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Vues aériennes

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

J'utilise une de tes photos :)

Quality Image Promotion

Navigation menu

Search