User talk:Bedivere/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Canciller Andrés Allamand participa del saludo protocolar al Presidente de Bolivia, Luis Arce, y al Vicepresidente, David Choquehuanca 02.jpg

[edit]
File:Canciller Andrés Allamand participa del saludo protocolar al Presidente de Bolivia, Luis Arce, y al Vicepresidente, David Choquehuanca 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Frodar (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canciller Andrés Allamand participa del saludo protocolar al Presidente de Bolivia, Luis Arce, y al Vicepresidente, David Choquehuanca 01.jpg

[edit]
File:Canciller Andrés Allamand participa del saludo protocolar al Presidente de Bolivia, Luis Arce, y al Vicepresidente, David Choquehuanca 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Frodar (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LR permission request discussion invitation

[edit]

Dear Kuatrero:

I'm sorry to bother you!

Hello, I'm BureibuNeko. I send the message to invite you to participate in a discussion about whether I can obtain LR permissions. I think the current vote is unfair, at least relatively. Therefore, if you can participate in this discussion, I will be grateful. ( Whether you support or oppose )

Sorry to bother you again !

In addition, I invite you because you have expressed your opinions on LR permission request page, so this is not canvassing! And thank you again!

Regards,
What color are you, Sibyl System? 11:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@4nn1l2: Thanks for trusting me :-) Bedivere (talk) 13:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

[edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Bedivere, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you rubin16 :-) Bedivere (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abraham Quintanilla.png

[edit]
File:Abraham Quintanilla.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ixfd64 (talk) 02:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AB Quintanilla.png

[edit]
File:AB Quintanilla.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ixfd64 (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Works licensed under Cc-Gobierno de Chile

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you've been nominating various images with a {{Cc-Gobierno de Chile}} tag for speedy deletion. Note that speedy deletion is only for obvious cases, where a patrolling admin can immediately understand why the image is not freely licensed as stated. Please use the regular COM:DR process in the future for these kinds of images. If there are restrictions on the applicability of the tag, then you can propose changes to the wording of the template so that everyone can easily see which images are ineligible for the tag. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely own work

[edit]

Hi, note that "unlikely own work" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. I've converted some of your tags to regular DRs: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pedro María Ramírez.png. COM:CSD#F1 says: "Content is a clear copyright violation, with evidence that no Commons-compatible licensing has been issued by the copyright holder." The speedy deletion tagger must provide evidence of their position, which usually comes in the form of a link to another copy on the web which is older and at least as large as the version on Commons, and which does not have a free license indicated at the external site. Without this evidence we are just guessing, which is an acceptable reason for regular deletion, but not speedy deletion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @King of Hearts: No worries. I will start up some deletion requests next time. It's just that I've found it's less time-consuming and wastes less people's time to just get rid of some copyvios that might be obvious for their low quality and dubious status, as it seems to me in my recent requests. Bedivere (talk) 02:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For relatively straightforward cases that don't fall under speedy deletion, you can also use "delayed" deletion templates such as {{subst:npd}} (if the image names an author who is not the same as the uploader, and there is no evidence of permission) or {{subst:nsd}} (if the image does not have a source, and the source is not obvious from context). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(...)

[edit]

(...) I implore you to delete an image, or two, but I see that you are a (...) for copyrghts. (...) I wish you the worst, (...) Monteaguilino1 (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor

[edit]

Hola, Bedivere. Por favor, no te dirijas a otros usuarios llamándolos por su nombre "IRL" sin venir a cuento (viene con un poco de retardo esta petición, pero seguramente seas capaz de recordar cuándo lo hiciste). Estoy seguro de que eres un usuario que sabe lo molesto que puede ser esto, lo que hace que esta situación me llame aún más la atención. Gracias por adelantado. Sin otro particular, Strakhov (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Strakhov Sin duda. Aunque debo aclarar que lo hice solo porque el propio usuario lo mencionaba en su PU. Veo que ahora pide que no lo mencionen por su nombre real. Un gran saludo. Bedivere (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Es evidente que si un usuario se cambia de nombre y lo elimina de todas partes muchas ganas de que se refieran a él por el antiguo no ha de tener, no hace falta esperar a que te lo pida de forma explícita. Sentido común, por favor. Strakhov (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

El nombre de Valparaíso

[edit]

Buenas noches, Bedivere. Yo había mencionado que Valparaíso fue nombrada así por "Valparaíso de Arriba". Omití mencionar por qué la llamaron así. Se puede leer en esta referencia oficial: Gobierno Regional de Valparaíso. Saludos, Fadesga (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado @Fadesga: no hay claridad al respecto. Cómo dice el artículo que enlazas, es solo una posibilidad (se proponen dos teorías), por lo tanto no está establecido. Bedivere (talk) 05:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Academialogo.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Academialogo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Taichi (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aclaro que solo hice un recorte al logotipo, no soy el uploader original. Bedivere (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I see that you tagged File:Gino Meschiari.jpg for speedy deletion with the rationale "not released under that license". In general, COM:CSD#F1 requires proof of copyvio and reasonable confidence that the image cannot possibly be public domain, so for these older photos it is better to use regular COM:DR. However, in this case it qualifies for {{PD-Italy}}, since the subject died in 1947 (and so any photo of them must have been taken before then). See Commons:Copyright rules/Photographs for more info on which countries have a special short copyright term for photos, including but not limited to Italy, Spain, Poland, Argentina, and Peru. Also be careful about US works (of any type, not just photos) prior to 1989, because they may be public domain as well (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Copyright formalities). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your much appreciated advice, King of Hearts. Will keep that in mind in future tagging. have a good day! Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foto

[edit]

Hola, en mi página de discusión, respondí tu requerimiento sobre mi foto. Ojalá puedas leerlo a la brevedad. Espero tu respuesta. Abrazo. Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reversiones

[edit]

La plantilla que colocas en mis fotos dice que "si no es considerado para borrado rápido, se retire la plantilla" y que te deje un mensaje. Bueno, las fotos de Ana Torin fueron tomadas con mi celular, nunca he tenido un iPhone como equipo personal, sin embargo, he tomado fotos con otros dispositivos. Sin embargo, aunque tomé las fotos, y obviamente fui el fotógrafo, si no puedo demostrar que el equipo es mío, entiendo que hagan un borrado, está bien, pero, ¿las de Ana fueron tomadas con un iPhone? Y la del grupo 123 Andrés, lamento no haberla tomado con mi celular, sino con la cámara de otra persona, creí que yo tenía que ser el fotógrafo, no el dueño del equipo. Te agradecería revises bien esas plantillas, pues, las justificaciones para borrar están erróneas en el caso de Ana. Gracias. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, dear license reviewer

[edit]
If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Bedivere, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Killarnee (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Killarnee and Mdaniels who supported my request. Will do my best! Bedivere (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:License review/Requests

[edit]

HI, Are you opposing or supporting? Yann (talk) 20:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, my mind got messed up after reading primat's oppose vote 🤣🤣🤣 Bedivere (talk) 20:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commemorative plaque with engrave (free license?)

[edit]

Buenas. Since you know more about copyright in Chile than I do, I would like to ask you something. You see, there is an image of the prominent Chilean lawyer and jurist René Ramos Pazos, which I would like to add to Commons. The problem is that I don't know if it can be shared through a free license, since it is an engraving, which is on a commemorative plaque, at the entrance to the Universidad de Concepción School of Law Library. I would really appreciate it if you could answer that question for me.

I am attaching the images, which are uploaded externally to the cloud.

Mi más cordial saludo Monteaguilino1 (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Monteaguilino1 perdón por no responder antes. Is that a permanently public place? If so, freedom of panorama applies and the photo could be uploaded without risks. Bedivere (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean Threshold of originality.

[edit]

I'm somewhat unfamiliar with what the ToO is like in Chile but COM:Chile hints at it being low? Wanted to check with someone who'd probably know more about Chilean law than I do Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a messy subject to be honest. Actually you could submit a drawing of letter "a" in whatever font you find using a digital program/app, and the Departamento de Propiedad Intelectual could grant you a Registro de Propiedad Intelectual (Intellectual Property Registry) number. What most misunderstand, however, is that registering the work does not imply necessarily that it is copyrighted. It serves merely as an "assertion" of copyright. That means that if the work ends up in the middle of a lawsuit, the registry could be used to "assert" (not prove) it is your work and that it is copyrighted. I strongly disagree, as a result, with the example given in the TOO Chile page. It has not been judicially confirmed that phrase (in that particular writing) is copyrighted. We could assume that, in Chile, the threshold of originality is very low or that there is no threshold of originality at all if there is no judicial sentence. Bedivere (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More coat of arms for you to review

[edit]

I saw you nominated some files I uploaded to the wiki. Please, do the same (where it should be done obviously) with most of the coats at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anexo:Comunas_de_Chile as their are almost done the same way based on the original one from the city. In some cases, they are supposedluy based on other works, but if you check them... I cannot see relevant resemblance (for instance Escudo de Arica.svg with Coat of arms of Bolivia.svg (they only took the mountain), nor say where they based the artworks as to be an "official" coat of arms. Thanks for making the site more righteous. ravmn (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC-4)

In some cases these coats of arms are very old and/or are simple enough to not be copyrighted. --Bedivere (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Gnom

[edit]

Hello Bedivere, thank you for your comment on my RfA. I added some more information in the comments section, does this help you? If not, is there anything else I should add? Thank you again, Gnom (talk) 13:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Licence reviewer discussion

[edit]

Hello, please explain why you closed the discussion about my license reviewer request? Only one user voted there. And I even didn't have time to answer. If it's a discussion there must be an explained discussion based on opinion of several voters. FlorianH76 (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was open for several days, archived, and you immediately opened it again. Not to mention it's been opposed by another user, it is unlikely you would gain support anyway given Jeff's questioning, that was pertinent enough. However, the immediate reasoning for closing your request is that it was already closed with no action just a couple of days ago. Gain some experience and then reapply. Kind regards. Bedivere (talk) 05:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But haven't you noticed that Jeff didn't explain why he opposed? All my uploads have proper licenses. The opinion of one user is not enough for making a decision. The discussion can't be closed just because one user opposed without any explanation. FlorianH76 (talk) 14:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They did explain their reasoning. And I already said that is not the reason for closing. Bedivere (talk) 16:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He said that my uploads are not properly licensed. But the only concern he discussed was about this file: Nikolay Melnikov.jpg, which I properly licensed within one day. Please explain what I did wrong here. And according to the claims on his user page his actions can be politically biased. FlorianH76 (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For whatever it's worth, you should ask @Jeff G. Bedivere (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@FlorianH76: According to your user talk page, lots of your files were deleted. If you apply again within six months, I will personally close the discussion in the negative. About politics, I have nothing against the Russian people, only against Putin and what he is making them do. Bombing hospitals, killing women and children, that's just not right.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: 2 deleted files were only cropped versions of files uploaded not by me. 3 were screenshots from youtube videos, which had CC license and they were deleted ONLY after I requsted to discuss their licenses in a copyright discuss forum in Russian Wikipedia. These are FIVE files. If you say LOTS, it means that you are trying to deliberately distort my contributions here. I don't know anything about politics and I've never ever claimed any political views here. I just simply uploaded free files on Wikimedia. What wrong did I do? FlorianH76 (talk) 23:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Com:LRR

[edit]

Please take care when closing Com:LRR requests, it says ”excluding the section heading with {{Frh}} and {{Frf}}“. Thanks. Killarnee (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, thanks for correcting it. I saw it last night and thought there was something wrong with it. Thanks again @Killarnee. Bedivere (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh please you did it again Special:diff/840864155 Killarnee (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh lol sorry about that @Killarnee, thanks for fixing it up! Bedivere (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion requests

[edit]

Hi Bedivere, thank you for going through suspicious uploads like those of Carigval.97 and nominating them for deletion. But please reserve {{Copyvio}} for those cases where you have a weblink or other reference where the respective images have been taken from. This template is reserved for obvious cases where no further research is required. In other cases, like this one, it is better to use the batch task tool to mass nominate all similarly suspicious uploads of one user in one deletion request. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 09:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Un regalo para el nuevo administrador de sus camaradas...

¡Felicidades Bedivere! Ya tienes derechos de administrador en Wikimedia Commons. Por favor toma unos minutos para leer Commons:Administradores y añadir a tu lista de vigilancia las páginas relacionadas (en particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard y Commons:Deletion requests), antes de lanzarte a borrar y proteger páginas, bloquear cuentas y modificar páginas protegidas, dado que Commons tiene sus propias reglas que pueden diferir de las de otras wikis.

La mayoría de las acciones de un administrador pueden ser deshechas por los demás, salvo la fusión de historiales, por lo que esto último debe realizarse con sumo cuidado.

Recuerda también que Commons es un proyecto multilingüe, puedes usar español si lo deseas. Ten la libertad de entrar a nuestro canal de IRC: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

¡Muchas gracias, @EugeneZelenko, y a todos los que votaron, sea a favor o en contra, en mi postulación a administrador! Me siento muy honrado por la confianza y espero estar a la altura de ella. Un gran abrazo a todos.
English: Many thanks, EugeneZelenko, and everyone who voted, in favour or against, in my request for adminship! I feel very honoured to have been trusted with the tools and I hope to be live up to the trust you have deposited in me. A great hug everyone. Bedivere (talk) 17:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats and welcome to the admin team, Bedivere. Abzeronow (talk) 18:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Abzeronow! :-) Bedivere (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here you are finally. Welcome @Bedivere! ─ Aafī (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @TheAafi! :-) Bedivere (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just my thought!

[edit]

Any user should be free to mass-remove stuff from their talk-pages. I wonder what made you click rollback here? ─ Aafī (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I know they can remove content from their talk page (warnings can still be retrieved from the page history) but I decided to rollback all of their latest edits since it was obvious they were just making vandalism by removing speedy deletion tags and discussions. Bedivere (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongfully Deleted File

[edit]

There was very little discussion and no one was listening to my point of view. Besides, it already had an in-scope use here before it was wrongfully deleted. Everyone who supported deletion was being dismissive TheKumquatGuy2662 (talk) 16:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there @TheKumquatGuy2662. The file in question was deleted as a result of a deletion request, that is, by decision of the community. The file had no use in other projects and therefore it was out of scope. That page you mention is a personal one, and you added the flag yourself, when you shouldn't have edited such personal user space. Additionally, two users opposed the restoration of the image. You are free to contribute in other areas or uploading media that serves an educational purpose. Bedivere (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quitting Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons forever. No one appreciates my contributions and they don't allow me to express myself. Goodbye TheKumquatGuy2662 (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheKumquatGuy2662 That is quite a decision to make! However, you seem to forget there are rules and policies around here and that you, like everybody else, are expected to respect. I appreciate your enthusiasm but that does not mean you should not behave accordingly. Bedivere (talk) 17:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but it is too late TheKumquatGuy2662 (talk) 17:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Andy Dingley

[edit]

Hi. Why is "FOP" not a valid deletion reason? --Krd 05:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I forgot to mention. I think de mínimis applies as the mural is not the main feature Bedivere (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What else is depicted in the image? Can we correct the file name and description, pixelize the mural, and get an in-scope image? I don't think so. Krd 14:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are right. My impression was that the mural itself is so low quality (the image) that it should be kept, but I understand now that besides that, it has no use and precautionarily should've been deleted. Bedivere (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thx. Krd 17:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

closure of discussion

[edit]

You added a notice at the discussion on ANU "Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. ". Where should this be made? Enhancing999 (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a standard message. My closure message reads at the end: "If they do continue to make problematic renames, please return and report again." That's my advice. I see there's threads at the village pump so you can alternatively continue discussing there Bedivere (talk) 12:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido futuro.png

[edit]

@Bedivere:Buenas,esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept) y una cosa por favor cierra el DR. AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster of the movie The Barn Dance.jpg

[edit]
File:Poster of the movie The Barn Dance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bedivere/Archive_1&oldid=899378355"