User talk:Basili
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 10:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 04:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 05:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Affichette antigaulliste 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Lilyu (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Médaille turinoise du 3ème concours général de tir "a segna" 1898-Avers.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:Image:Médaille turinoise du 3ème concours général de tir "a segna" 1898-Avers.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Médaille du 3ème concours de "tir a segna" - Turin 1898-Revers.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:Image:Médaille du 3ème concours de "tir a segna" - Turin 1898-Revers.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
85.183.215.82 08:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Il me semble que le lieu représenté sur le fichier est l'esplanade des Invalides. N'y aurait-il pas une erreur dans la légende ? Benchaum (talk) 18:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Bravo ! Bien vu ! Je rectifie mon erreur. Merci beaucoup !
- --Basili (discuter) 09:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- A vue de nez, ce serait pas tiré de "L'Illustration de 1858, deuxième volume" Esby (talk) 00:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Si c'est le cas, cela signifierait que Le Voleur l'a emprunté à L'Illustration. J'ai également mis sur Commons la première page en entier du numéro du Voleur, avec la gravure ici recadrée. J'ai ajouté cette première page entière comme illustration de l'article de Wikipédia "Le Voleur". --Basili (discuter) 11:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Je n'avais pas réalisé que le voleur était un periodique de l'époque. A la reflexion, ca ressemble au style de l'époque, c'est tout. Esby (talk) 14:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
rotation d'image
[edit]Juste pour dire que je suis intervenu ici, l'image va être tourné par le bot dédié d'ici demain. Esby (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Silhouette de grenouille - CHAM.jpg was uncategorized on 14 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Grenouille - CHAM.jpg was uncategorized on 14 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Le chansonnier révolutionnaire Charles Gille.jpg was uncategorized on 10 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ces images ne sont pas catégorisées car elles sont défectueuses et à supprimer. J'en ai téléversé une version corrigée.
Discussion utilisateur:Sémhur
[edit]Hello:
I have just deleted the following, because it is not in the correct place. I think you want to put the message on User talk:Sémhur.
As far as your question goes, I can find no file of yours that has been deleted recently and no message on your talk page that says a file will be deleted soon. It would be helpful in such cases if you would tell us what image is in question. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Discussion utilisateur:Sémhur
Categories (++): (+)
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
[edit] Problème
Cher Sémhur,
J'ai un problème : on vient de me supprimer une image pour violation de copyright alors que j'en suis l'auteur et l'ai mise moi-même sur Commons. J'ai écrit à celui qui l'a supprimé. Je ne le connais pas et ignore quand il va me lire. Pourrais-tu rétablir cettte image ? Merci beaucoup.
Cordialement.
Basili (discuter) 12:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Please read COM:OVERCAT. Foroa (talk) 10:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Affiche Carnaval de Paris 1994.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Prof. Professorson (talk) 08:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour, La pratique de Wikimedia Commons est que les photos doivent être accompagnées d'une permission si elles représentent une oeuvre qui a été publiée auparavant, et qui n'est pas dans le domaine publique. L'image peut-être restaurée au fois que nous avons reçu la permission. Voir COM:OTRS pour les détails. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je viens d'envoyer le mail OTRS. J'y ai précisé que concernant le fichier File:Affiche Carnaval de Paris 1994.jpg, je suis l'auteur de ce document, une aquarelle. Le dessin, en noir et blanc avant la mise en couleurs est également mon œuvre. Le texte et le lettrage aussi. L'association indiquée a été fondée par moi en juillet 1998 et j'en suis le président. Cordialement. Basile Pachkoff dit Basili (discuter) 17:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai restauré le fichier et je vais ajouter les précisions en page de discussion. Basile, si tu as un numéro de ticket OTRS, merci de me le passer pour que je l'ajoute sur la description du fichier. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:52, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup ! Je suppose que le numéro de ticket OTRS correspond à une réponse reçue à mon mail ? Pour l'instant je n'en ai pas. Basili (discuter) 20:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oui c'est ça. On me dit dans l'oreillette qu'OTRS est un peu dans les choux en ce moment... En tout cas je garde le poster en page de suivi, au cas où. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- MERCI ! Basili (discuter) 13:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oui c'est ça. On me dit dans l'oreillette qu'OTRS est un peu dans les choux en ce moment... En tout cas je garde le poster en page de suivi, au cas où. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup ! Je suppose que le numéro de ticket OTRS correspond à une réponse reçue à mon mail ? Pour l'instant je n'en ai pas. Basili (discuter) 20:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai restauré le fichier et je vais ajouter les précisions en page de discussion. Basile, si tu as un numéro de ticket OTRS, merci de me le passer pour que je l'ajoute sur la description du fichier. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:52, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Euro drapeau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 15:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Drapeau de Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 17:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Carnival Queens
[edit]Hi Basili. You created Category:Reines de fêtes et carnavals. Nice done, interesting. I actually have a problem, how to integrate that in the category-tree of Category:Women called queens. I believe, we should have a new sub-category there Category:Carnival Queens, which would have as another sub-cat Category:Carnival Queens of France. Therefor I would like to redirect your cat to the new ones and seperate fotos related to French and non-French carnivals. But I do not exactly understand the difference between "fêtes" and carnival. Watching the fotos, I believe, that "fêtes" are not carnival-related at all but festivals or ceremonies. Is that correct ? Often related with a product, like roses, fashion, cheese (Brie?), ... But basically the queens seemed (not any more?) to represent just a city or area, right ? Than I would collect them in Category:Regional Queens. What is a "La Reine de Reines" ? And what is a "Char de La Reine" ? So beside seperation French and non-French queens, one has to seperate carnival and product (e.g. Category:Rose Queens), ceremony/festival (e.g.: Category:Festival Queens) and regional queens. Would you agree ? Krgds --Wistula (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Les Reines sont une longue tradition française étendue à la Belgique au moins. Paris aurait lancé cette mode, qui s'est propagée ensuite. Il y eu d'abord les Reines de la Mi-Carême, qui ont donné les Reines de Carnaval, la Reine des Reines de la Mi-Carême. La Reine des Reines a existé depuis 1891 jusqu'à 1939. La Reine du Marché de Porta Palazzo élue à Turin à partir de 1902 est aussi inspirée de Paris. C'est une longue tradition très riche où on retrouve le Carnaval, d'autres fêtes, l'extension à des manifestations de promotion de produits régionaux (nougat de Montélimar, par exemple). Ces reines sont élues par les femmes au début. Puis cette élection leur échappe. Etc. C'est passionnant et peu étudié il me semble. Bien sûr, on peut se mettre à subdiviser : reines des fraises, des filets bleus, etc. Mais cela sera d'ampleur limitée. Est-il juste de créer une catégorie par sorte de reines ? Sans compter que certaines reines sont difficile à catégoriser. Une reine des Halles de Paris est-elle également une reine du Carnaval de Paris ? Il arrive qu'elle soit les deux. Il existe aussi des Reines de la Mi-Carême qui défilent au Carnaval de Paris et d'autres qui défilent juste au Carnaval de Paris et pas à la Mi-Carême. Tous ces titres sont plus ou moins officiels. C'est assez compliqué. Si vous voulez voir les visages de toutes les Reines des Reines de Paris, allez voir l'article de Wikipédia "Mi-Carême au Carnaval de Paris", vous verrez la galerie des portraits avec noms et prénoms des 51 Reines des Reines de Paris. Ce fut un travail énorme pour rassembler ces informations que personne n'avait rassemblé, sauf en listes partielles dans des journaux anciens. En mettant les listes ensemble, retrouvant les portraits j'ai réussi à mettre cette documentation à la portée de tous. Le Char de la Reine des Reines était le char de parade de la Reine des Reines, il était jadis très célèbre à Paris et imité dans d'autres villes. Cordialement. Basili (discuter) 11:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Basili ! I will see, how to handle the categorization in a senseful way. Another question please: today you do not have such (product-, region- or carnival) queens in France and Belgium anymore ? The tradition died with the war ? Kind regards --Wistula (talk) 12:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dmos.gif
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dmos.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Dmos.gif]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Angelus(talk) 00:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Basili, you put this image under GFDL and CC licenses, but also wrote "Domaine public" into the permission-entry. That makes hardly sense. It should be either GFDL/CC or PD. Also, "Photo" in the source-entry should be replaced by "own" if you are the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Per Commons:Overcat#Over-categorization I have removed Category:Mi-Carême au Carnaval de Paris from all these images as Category:Mi-Carême au Carnaval de Paris 2014 is already a sub-category of it. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:P1290105 Diane vandalisée.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:P1290105 Diane vandalisée.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Homme mesurant un tram.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- Tuválkin ✉ 20:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Haut du mât du char électrique De Dion-Bouton de la Reine des Reines de la rive droite 1903 Marie-Missiaux.jpeg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Haut du mât du char électrique De Dion-Bouton de la Reine des Reines de la rive droite 1903 Marie-Missiaux.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Goguettiers par Daumier 2.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Goguettiers par Daumier 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Global account
[edit]Hi Basili! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Kiosque à journaux près du métro Pernety - rue Raymond Losserand - Charlie est affichéP1340369.JPG
[edit]File:Kiosque à journaux près du métro Pernety - rue Raymond Losserand - Charlie est affichéP1340369.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Couverture du livre de souvenirs d'Ossip Minor en russe paru à Paris en 1933.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Couverture du livre de souvenirs d'Ossip Minor en russe paru à Paris en 1933.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Le marteau du président de la goguette de la Lice chansonnière.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Le marteau du président de la goguette de la Lice chansonnière.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 19:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Photographies colorisées has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Civa (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Basile Pachkoff costumé en Pantruche et Alain Riou costumé en Buffalo Bill au Carnaval de Paris 1999.jpg
[edit]File:Basile Pachkoff costumé en Pantruche et Alain Riou costumé en Buffalo Bill au Carnaval de Paris 1999.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Le Géant-Boeuf du Carnaval de Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Barbaillans.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Annonce de la création de l'Istituto per la Propaganda della Cultura Italiana - Revue historique - janvier-avril 1920 - page 192.png
[edit]File:Annonce de la création de l'Istituto per la Propaganda della Cultura Italiana - Revue historique - janvier-avril 1920 - page 192.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 13:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
File:La Ballade du Boeuf Gras - Dessin de Punch - Paroles de Léo Lelièvre - Musique de Emile Spencer.jpg
[edit]File:La Ballade du Boeuf Gras - Dessin de Punch - Paroles de Léo Lelièvre - Musique de Emile Spencer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Carnaval de Paris 2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 22:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Natacha Chylowsky épouse Pataïev 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Altenmann (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Reines de fêtes et carnavals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |