User talk:Alex:D/3

Thank you

Thank you for taking the trouble to make the information for some/many of the images complete. This adds lasting value to Wikimedia Commons. Siebrand 14:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How?

Hello. I noticed the file Image:Mussolini1.gif, and wanted to ask, how did you take that piece of film out of a video and convert it into a gif? Imagefan 00:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What's the program called? Imagefan 00:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah. Thanks. Imagefan 00:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Geocoding

Hello Alex:D/3, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 15:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{location|lat deg|lat min|lat sec|NS|long deg|long min|long sec|EW}}

Thanks for the tip. I shall try to put the location from now on on every photo from Braşov. If you can run a robot, it would be great to mark all images from Category:Braşov with 45°39′N, 25°36′E. --Alex:D 16:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this is best solution. Will be good idea to put exact coordinates to every image. Unfortunately Google Maps doesn't have hi-res satellite image for Braşov :-( May be some other online service have or you could use GPS? --EugeneZelenko 16:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AdolfHitler.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:AdolfHitler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

William Avery 12:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian domnitors

Hi! I've noticed that some time time ago you uploaded several pictures with Romanian domnitors. Recently I've discovered a web site with nice pictures regarding the subject that I thought you may like it. I don't know if I will have time (and patience) to upload them on Commons. For some of them I don't know what license to use. I would say that all of them are PD. Here is the link: Biblioteca V.A. Urechia Galati - EXPOZIŢIA „DOMNITORI ŞI PRINCIPI AI ŢĂRILOR ROMÂNE“. Mvelam 12:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electrecord

I saw Image:ElectrecordSideB.jpg and I searched some for information about the year that the Gramophone was made. The label says 1883 but wikipedia says that the company was started in 1932. Do you have additional information about this? Thanks -- carol 00:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC) (not a bot this time)[reply]

Thank you for replying to this here. -- carol 21:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image issues

The image that you are in disagreement about has now been reverted to the original and protected. This must be sorted out and there is a thread here on the subject seeking views. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mussolini1.gif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mussolini1.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rumânia în 1833, văzută de Cesar Bolliac.jpg

Image:Rumânia în 1833, văzută de Cesar Bolliac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 09:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pictures and paintings with the flag of Romania

I asked for speedy deletion because there were some duplicate euivalent categories in category:photographs of flags by country so it's better to be homogeneous with other countries. Therefore I created category:photographs of flags of Romania and I created an equivalent category for paintings. Thanks for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cinematographe Lumiere.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Cinematographe Lumiere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 17:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steagul Regelui 1922

mai Alex mai, am avut o surpriza placuta. Tu ai creat steagurile si emblemele regale ? Exact steagul regelui, modelul patrat cu crucea lbastra pe rosu inchis, a fost arborat de ieri pe Palatul Elisabeta, in locul tricolorului simplu care era pana acum. Eu trec zilnic prin Herastrau, si cand l-am vazut mi-a crescut inima, arata super ! Iar azi am intrat sa vad steagul, care e. Si peste cine dau ? Alex:D :)) Tare ! Bravos. Madalin

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Pork packing in Cincinnati 1873.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pork packing in Cincinnati 1873.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 09:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Emblems of USA 1876.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Emblems of USA 1876.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images good descriptions

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded Image:Actual Satu Mare county CoA.png and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing! Sdrtirs (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagine:WWII_Southern_Central_Europe_1944-1945.png

the image Immagine:WWII_Southern_Central_Europe_1944-1945.png is not correct: at that time the rutenia was still Czechoslovakia!

I've put a note under the legend: Borders of 1948 (before Germany was split, but after USSR took parts of Romania, Poland and Czechoslovakia). --Alex:D (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stroboscope under article Gramophone

I note that you have provided a picture of a stroboscope for this article which you produced yourself (I'm not sure anyone could claim copyright on such an image). However, you have constructed it with 134 segments for the 45 rpm ring. This is not correct, the 45 rpm ring should have 133 segments. Both give a speed that is not exactly 45 rpm (it is not possible to construct such a disc that gives exactly 45 rpm), but 45.112 rpm (133 segments) is closer than 44.78 rpm (134 segments). The records are mastered at 45 rpm exactly. It is posible to construct a 45 rpm exactly strobe disc for a 60 Hz mains supply (166 segments). 20.133.0.13 15:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll correct that as soon as I'll figure out how to draw 133 equal segments. --Alex:D (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fototeca online a comunismului românesc

Salut, am văzut că ai înlocuit licenţa fotografiilor din fototecă cu CC-BY, dar aceasta este greşit: licenţa asta este echivalentă cu un contract: dacă nu a fost licenţa explicit, atunci nu este valid. Bogdangiusca (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mersi frumos, am înţeles acum. - Biruitorul (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Alex:D!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flags of the world 1911.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:War flag of the Democratic Republic of Moldova.png is uncategorized since 4 July 2009.
Image:R D Moldova.png is uncategorized since 6 July 2009.
Image:Sfatul Tarii.png is uncategorized since 6 July 2009.
Image:Naval jack of Romania (1948-1952).svg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rumania.gif was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Servus !

Relativ la :

File:Alexandru_Ioan_Cuza.jpg

File:Alexandru_Ioan_Cuza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:Alex:D|Alex:D (talk) 01:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...faceti cum socotiti mai bine, mie mi-e totuna, dar explicati-mi va rog motivele schimbarilor. Daca stergeti imaginea, trebuie scoasa si din articolul in care figureaza...

Multumita Photoshopului, m-am luat dupa tabloul oficial al Domnitorului, pentru a reproduce o litografie din biblioteca unchiului mamei mele, Iancu Grigorescu, infatisandu-l pe Cuza in straie de Farmazon, cu scria acolo.

Cu bine, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cuza si alte imagini Photoshopiate !

Fiindca sunt cam nedumerit : cand prelucrez eu azi cu Photoshop o imagine initial creata de altcineva, rezultatul e PD-self own work, sau ramane al acelui altcineva (eventual PD-old, ca in cazul tabloului cu Cuza) ? Chestia ma deranjeaza mai ales in cazul hartilor incomplete sau eronate, pe care eu le completez sau le corectez, schimbarea mea fiind insa minora : raman ale autorului initial (adesea alt contributor Wikipedia) sau devin PD-self own work Spiridon Manoliu ?

Multumesc pentru sfaturi !--Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 20:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Ukrainian_SSR.png

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Ukrainian_SSR.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Nickpo (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lenin.gif

File:Lenin.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 19:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images from the Online Photo Collection of the Romanian Communism

Category discussion notification

Category:Images from the Online Photo Collection of the Romanian Communism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Dahn (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FOCR

In Template:FOCR, what do you mean by "archival quota"? The term makes no sense in English (a "quota" is a minimum or maximum percentage of something allocated to a particular use). - Jmabel ! talk 05:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answered you on my page, since it looks like Dahn is also engaged in discussing there. - Jmabel ! talk 22:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Latvian SSR.png

Are you sure that the star was gold, not red? Cf. en:Coats of arms of the Soviet Republics ("the hammer and sickle and the red star that symbolised communism"). Picus viridis RSVP? 16:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Europe, 1921.jpg

This is a very nice map, however I am not sure about the date (1921), as the map shows the Irish Free State (founded December 1922) and Turkey as it was after the Treaty of Lausanne (July 1923) and before annexation of Iskenderun in 1939, so the earliest year of publication would be late 1923 or 1924. Could you please check? Sv1xv (talk) 08:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Better leave it for know with "1921", as renaming is a bit complicated. Sv1xv (talk) 09:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Map of Europe, 1923.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Map of Europe, 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Copyright status: File:Poiana_Brasov.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Poiana_Brasov.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Multichill (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes Schiltberger

Hi Alex, I've found File:Nicopole1540.jpg and that it was you, who loaded up this nice picture. Can you give me some bibliographical hints about the edition where you've found it? Thanks --95.33.112.1 08:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Sorry, I wasn't logged in. --Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 08:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insulele de pe bratul Chilia

Din motive de ignoranta tehnica nu am inscris-o cum trebuie, intre timp am mai progresat, voi incerca sa fac cum spui. Mersi !--Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Am mentionat, vad ca ai facut-o si Dumneata altfel, insfarsit sper ce este corect ! Cu bine, tot --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine

Salut! Ai putea, te rog, sa "albesti" un pic aceasta imagine? Eu am incercat, dar nu prea mi-a reusit in totalitate. Mersi anticipat! --Olahus (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mersi mult de tot. --Olahus (talk) 06:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steagul lui Constantin Brâncoveanu

Unde ai găsit sursa că steagul personal al lui C. Brâncoveanu este steagul bicolor galben-roşu în dungi (gen steagul lui Arpad) - pe crwflags? Mulţumesc anticipat!

Nu eu am găsit, eu doar am reconstituit modelul după relatarea altcuiva. --Alex:D (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aş fi foarte interesat de surasa acelei relatări.

Nu o ştiu. Încearcă să dai de chestia asta: Rezachevici, Constantin. Un steag domnesc necunoscut al lui Constantin Brâncoveanu, în Revista de Istorie (sau Revista Istorica, nu stiu exact), 2000, 11, nr. 1-2, p. 107-113. --Alex:D (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Dobrudja, 1887.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Seychelles.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

O. Empire...

(sorry my very bad english - I don't speak this, and use a google translator)

Friend,

After several problems with incorrectly deleted images here on Commons, and also because of my temporary removal in the troubled pt:wiki, I deleted of my computers many of the things he had done for the project - starting with lots of maps, made in CorelDraw would have to be completely redone - a task for which I do not have more time ...

So, You feel free to edit the my images.

Tks, André Koehne^{TALK TO ME} 17:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Administrative map of Romania, 1950-1968.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Buna ziua!

Buna ziua, ma numesc Mihai si sunt pasionat de istoria Romaniei. As vrea sa va intreb daca ma puteti lamuri si pe mine cum pot face harti? In cazul in care doriti sa imi dati o mana de ajutor adresa mea de messenger este tyras1980@yahoo.com Va multumesc!

Deprecated License

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Europe w asia n africa.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 13:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stalin.gif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stalin.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Posibile probleme cu en:Keyboard_layout#Romanian_.28in_Romania_and_Moldova.29

Salut,

Pe grupul traducătorilor români de open source a apărut un thread în care sunt menționate anumite probleme cu ce scrie în pagina respectivă. Ți-am scris tie pentru că tu ești cel care a încărcat imaginea aia cu layoutul de tastatură. Imaginile considerate corecte de cei de acolo sunt la http://i18n.ro/Tastaturi . Dacă ai timp, poate poți să-ți dai cu părerea/corectezi. Mersi.

P.S. Dacă vrei să răspunzi, răspunde te rog la ro:, aici intru rar.--Strainu (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probabil de acolo apare diferenta, ei vorbeau de standardele romanesti, tu de ce aveai pe tastatura. :)--Strainu (talk) 13:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

File:Princely standards of the Principality of Moldavia (14th-19th century).png

BotMultichillT 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Halftone,_Gaussian_Blur.jpg

File:Halftone,_Gaussian_Blur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 17:01, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modificarea numelui unei harti

Salut,

Vreau sa te intreb ce trebuie sa fac pentru a modifica numele acestei harti: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Die_Deutschen_Siedlungen_in_Süd_Siebenbürgen_(1940).jpg

Am facut 2 greseli, Deutschen trebuia scris cu d mic iar Süd_Siebenbürgen trebuia scris Südsiebenbürgen.

Numele hartii ar trebui sa arate asa: Die deutschen Siedlungen in Südsiebenbürgen (1940).jpg

Multumesc

User Talk:Andrein 12:01, 07 May 2010 (EET)

File:Petroleum in Rumania (1900).JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Romanian_settlements_in_Central_Serbia.jpg

File:Romanian_settlements_in_Central_Serbia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

194.106.189.244 10:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asa sunt multzi sarbi. Numai prostii cred in baliverna lui Iliescu cum ca ei ar fi cei mai buni prieteni. Nici cu nationalistii ungurii nu te poti certa in halul in care te certi cu astia. Uita-te numai ce edit-war este in momentul de fata la Atlasul Serbiei (vezi si pagina de discutie aici si aici), sau aici. Dar ce sa mai zic de aceasta discutie.--Olahus (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is this, olahus? You think that other users cant use google translate to see what you wrote in romanian? It is nice that you showed your true face and remember that your every statements can be used as evidence against you in proper time and proper place. 194.106.189.117 22:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bla, bla, Romanian-hating Serbian nationalist.--Olahus (talk) 23:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

very childish. one would never say that you live in civilized europe in the 21st century. 194.106.189.100 07:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look who's talking... You, chauvinistic people are the ones who brought problems to civilised Europe, not us! --Alex:D (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I spoke personaly about Olahus, not about „your“ people, „your“ political comrades or whatever you consider yourself to be a part of. But it is not nice that you too have an xenophobic attitude towards Serbs. 194.106.188.101 10:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Romanians are the only frienly neighbours of Serbia and guy like you are showing us what the Romanians receive in exchange for their friendship. I think that guys like you don't want to have friends. All the neighbous of Serbia recognized Kosovo's independence except your undeserved northeastern friends. I say it again: undeserved. This is the way for a Serbian nationalist to proove his friendship, right? --Olahus (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really wonder who's sockpuppet you are. I have 2 suspects: PANONIAN and CrniBombarder!!!. I think administrators will have to find this out with a checkuser. --Olahus (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who gave you the stupid idea that I hate Serbs? I hate chauvinism, bad intention and stupidity. --Alex:D (talk) 19:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garda_Financiara_emblema.svg

File:Garda_Financiara_emblema.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

188.26.37.86 04:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stema Brasovului

Care este sursa la aceasta stema?Asybaris01 (talk) 07:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Remove shoulders

Your request might get better response at the photography workshop. ZooFari 22:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Dgetzin (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the dates on this map are very badly wrong. The Holy Roman Empire did not get the German nation suffix till after the 1500s "reforms" and if this is really a map of 1099 or so, where is the byzantine empire? --Dgetzin (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello! If you can convert these files (File:Znak.jpg, File:Znak1.jpg) to SVG format. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Întrebäri tehnice

Bunä ziua,

am observat cä ati reusit sä corectati documente (härti) din Commons, pe care nu Dv. le introduseseti. Mie nu-mi merge : eu nu pot corecta decât cele introduse de mine. Daca încerc sa corectez altceva, când vreau sä introduc noua versiune cu acelasi nume, sistemul desigur îmi spune cä existä deja o imagine cu acel nume, dar îmi refuzä noua versiune. Pur si simplu nu se înregistreazäa si nu apare.

Si mai am o dificultate. Nu pot înregistra în Commons decât cu licenta "own", care de altfel este preselectionatä în formularul de introducere. Cand scanez pagini (în general härti) din lucräri anterioare anului 1940, îmi este imposibil sä le inregistrez cu licenta "old", pe care nu o pot selecta, fiindcä este dezactivatä (apare în gri, uneori nici nu figureazä în lista licentelor).

Nu stiu dacä cele douä fenomene sunt legate, dar îmi limiteazä posibilitätile de a contribui la Commons.

O ultimä întrebare: dacä sunteti cumva administrator pe Commons, îmi puteti oare redenumi contul, asa cum am procedat pe Wikipadia ordinar, atât în românä cât si în francezä, din "Spiridon MANOLIU" în "Spiridon Ion Cepleanu"?

Pentru orice explicatie sau ajutor, vä multumesc anticipat, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images and graphics per PD-RO-1956

Salut Alex! Martin H. asked me to direct this question to you. I am wondering if Template:PD-RO-1956 applies to images and graphics from a Romanian book from 1929 as is Getica by Vasile Pârvan, made available by the Romanian government here: [1]. I hope this license or others apply to this content, as some of the archaeological artifacts depicted were destroyed during World War 2, are lost or maybe in some obscure museums or private collections, making it impossible to create newer photographs. I am working on Dacia and Dacians and Wikipedia:WikiProject Dacia, and I gathering images with archaeological artifacts. Thanks a lot! --Codrin.B (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The creation of Vasile Parvan is in public domain since 1998. There is no sketcher named in that book so they are probably the drawings of Parvan. If so, it's ok to use them under Template:PD-old-70. --Alex:D (talk) 22:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LATER EDIT: The drawings were made by Dionisie Pecurariu, who died after 1960. However, his drawings does not qualify as artistic photography, neither as encyclopedia, dictionary and corpore. --Alex:D (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copied the response here, trying to keep the discussion in on place. Thanks a lot for the research and detail. So I am confused now. Are we sure all sketches are by Pecurariu? And if so, why wouldn't they quality as corpore? Or will PD-old-70 apply anyway? What about photographs if any (I need to check). Would they qualify to PD-RO-1956? Thanks again. --Codrin.B (talk) 23:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you speak Romanian. The law says 50 years after author's death, except: "a) pe termen de 20 ani de la aparitia operei cu privire la cei care alcatuiesc enciclopedii, dictionare si culegeri; b) pe termen de 10 ani de la aparitie cu privire la autorul unei serii de fotografii artistice; c) pe termen de 5 ani de la aparitie cu privire la autorul de fotografii artistice separate. " So Corpore is culegeri. The book is not a culegere. The name of Pecurariu is given in the introduction. There are some photos at the end, and each has its author written below. They are hardly artistic, but "fotografii de documentare". --Alex:D (talk) 11:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Yes, I do speak Romanian :-) However I am not convinced that "corpore = culegeri"?! Also, this specific book is obviously collecting a lot of information from everywhere, so the term "culegere", at least to me, makes sense to apply. Regarding the "fotografii de documentare", what law governs them? Also, I am not sure if the term "fotografii artistice" in 1956 meant what we mean today as "art in photography". I get the feeling they were simply referring to "photographs". Sorry that I have to bug you and insist, but I really want to clarify these things because as I said before, some of the archaeological artifacts depicted were destroyed during World War 2, are lost or maybe in some obscure museums or private collections, making it impossible to create newer photographs. And I am looking for constructive solutions to have them in Commons as I think they are valuable. Mersi! --Codrin.B (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eu am facut traducerea din romana in engleza, si deci culegeri=corpore. Fotografia artistica se practica si in anii 50, deci e clar ca se refera la fotografii de arta, de genul celor care apareau prin expozitii sau pe vederi de exemplu. Singurul lucru pe care ai putea sa-l faci este sa determini daca fotografii aceia au murit inainte de 1946, si atunci se aplica PD-RO-1956. --Alex:D (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licente pentru documente istorice

Buna Alex,

Te bat la cap in continuare legat de imagini, poze, schite de arheologie. Lucrez acum la Capidava si as vrea sa pot pune mai multe imagini de la CIMEC. Sunt tot felul de imagini, unele facute de arheologi in 1930, altele sunt reproduceri medievale ale unor documente antice. Nu ma ajuti te rog sa inteleg care s-ar putea califica la public domain sau sub alte licente.

Legat de reproduceri medievale ale documentelor antice, ce intelegi tu despre reproducerea din 1542 a documentului antic Notitia Dignitatum. Se afla la Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, care par ca si-au pus copyright pe ea, desi mi se pare cam aberant. Au copyright pe versiunea digitala a cartii medievale? Am downloadad un PDF de la ei in care zice: "The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek (BSB) owns the copyright for all web documents, in particular for all images. Any further use of the web documents is subject to the approval of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek and/or the author. External links to the offer of the BSB are expressly welcome. However, it is illegal to copy whole pages or complete articles or parts of articles without prior authorisation. Some individual materials may be copied for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the authorship of the author(s) or of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek is indicated unambiguously. Unless provided otherwise by the copyright law, it is illegal and may be prosecuted as a punishable offence to use copyrighted articles and representations of the data stored on the servers of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, in particular by copying or disseminating them, without the prior written approval of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. It is in particular illegal to store or process any data in data systems without the approval of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek." Adica pe Commons ar fi ok?

Dupa cum am zis, vreau sa aduc cat mai multe imagini legate de arheologie, care dupa logica mea, ar trebuie sa fie destul de academice si permise pe WP/Commons, dar legile si regulile par oricum incurcate.

Sper sa nu te mai bat la cap dupa ce pricep cum stau lucrurile.

Mersi mult --Codrin.B (talk) 04:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cu privire la imaginile care sigur ar fi in domeniul public pentru ca sunt de sute de ani, ele pot fi aduse aici, cu conditia ca imaginea digitala sa fie copie identica sau la scara a originalului, si nu o "opera derivata" cum spune legea noastra, care ar putea insemna imagine restaurata/colorizata etc. Pentru imaginile din secolul XX ar fi bine de stiut autorul si daca acesta a murit inainte de 1941. --Alex:D (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Romania nu are FoP?!

Alex, poti sa te uiti te rog la requestul asta pentru stergere: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:2009-DSC09986.JPG

Pozele par OK, sunt puse de cel care le-a facut.

Sunt of grama de requesturi aici: User_talk:A.Catalina

Turelio asta vrea sa stearga o gramada de poze cu Romania, spunand ca Romania nu are FoP. Mie mi se pare poarte suspect si incorect. Cu logica asta, o gramada de poze despre Romania vor fi sterse. Ce este acest FoP?

Numai bine --Codrin.B (talk) 03:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:JuniiBrasoveni_1918bis.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JuniiBrasoveni_1918bis.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:JuniiBrasoveni_1918.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JuniiBrasoveni_1918.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radu de la Afumati.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radu de la Afumati.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

:| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 11:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coat of arms of Comrat.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coat of arms of Comrat.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

:| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 21:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag_of_Guatemala_(1924).svg

File:Flag_of_Guatemala_(1924).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

:| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 00:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of San Marino.svg

http://www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm/on-line/Home/LavoriConsiliari/Dettaglidelleconvocazioni/documento17044527.html is the new law of the San Marino flag and the colors of the flag are on pages 3 and 4 of the document. It is supposed be a lighter shade as of now. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 18:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put a link on my talk page about a Pantone chart from the Pantone company; you can get HEX colors from that page. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FOCR

Template:FOCR has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of the Karelo-Finnish SSR

hello, you have achieved in 2008, a beautiful coat of arms of the Socialist Republic of Romania, could you please thanks to your model make the coat of arms of in SVG.

thank you in advance for your help Good day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Barbados.png

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Barbados.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 05:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EscudoMalawi.PNG

File:EscudoMalawi.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 08:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Bahamas.png

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Bahamas.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 07:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drapele de lupta

Servus!

La un moment dat ne-am mai conversat pe tema drapelelor de lupta al unitatilor/institutiilor militare/militarizate din Romania (atunci era vorba de un drapel al Jandarmeriei). Aveam atunci banuiala ca ar fi si alte modele de drapele de lupta, altele decat ale SMG, FT, FN, FA si JR. Dar banuiala asta nu este un motiv bun de lucru. Acum am vazut un drapel de lupta al SRI. Apare pe galeria foto a Romania Actualitati (a noua poza. "Extrapoland", din nou 'presupun ca mai sunt urmatoarele steaguri/drapele de lupta: Politie, Politie de Fronitiera, Pompieri, SPP, si chiar SIE. Dar despre astea nu am decat vagi idei, iar despre ultimele doua chiar FOARTE vagi. Iti scriu tie pentru ca tot tu ai facut celelalte 5 drapele de lupta (SMG, FT, FN, FA si JR) si, pe langa faptul ca eu n-am nici ce mai vaga idee despre crearea unor imagini ca ale steagurilor noastre de lupta, presupun ca e mai usor sa se modifice un model deja existent. :) --ES Vic (talk) 10:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Dacia

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA

and WP:DACIA

to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brasov coat of arms

Hi,

I found this image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interbelic_Brasov_CoA.png and here is my version: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coa_Romania_Town_Brass%C3%B3.svg You wrote, "Note that this is not the official design!" I think, my version is an interbellic version. I would like both. What can I do, for the official version? Bye and Happy new year! Madboy74 (talk) 16:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:005.Un grup de revolutionari de la Tatar-Bunar din timpul rascoalelor de la 19.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Posada - Medieval book editions

Hi! I tried to add more information to File:Viennese Illuminated Chronicle Posada.jpg and its related versions File:Chronicon Pictum P0146 A posadai csata2.JPG and File:Chronicon Pictum P0143 A posadai csata1.JPG. The drawings are similar, but with distinct elements. They appear to be from different medieval books editions. Do you know which ones and where are they at this time (museums etc?). I added to each image the related ones in the Other versions section. Would love to clarify this. Thanks and regards--Codrin.B (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found a fourth version! File:Battle1330.jpg.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mihai Viteazul intrand in Alba Iulia.jpg

Buna. Interesanta pictura. Dar cine e autorul si care e sursa? --Codrin.B (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posada Thuroczy.jpg

Buna, am nevoie de cateva lamuriri pentru File:Posada Thuroczy.jpg

Esti sigur ca asta e batalia de la Posada? Din ce sursa?
Din ce sursa e imaginea?

Am convertit-o la {{Artwork}} si adaugat cateva informatii. Orice detalii ai avea, ar fi de ajutor. Mersi! --Codrin.B (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Am inteles, multumesc pentru raspuns. Din ce sursa e imaginea? --Codrin.B (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

O sursa foarte buna de imagini

Am gasit o sursa foarte buna de imagini vechi: iMago Romaniae. Toate cele bune! --Codrin.B (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic Lab Help

Hey, I am a graphist like you but I've had a very unlucky problem today. The detailed problem is here, can you help me please? It is really urgent for me. Thanks, good evening. Berkaysnklf (talk), 16:05, 13 October, 2012 (UTC)

Stemele Țării Românești

Salut! Am vazut ca ai contribuit multe din stemele Țării Românești la Category:Coats of arms of Wallachia. Articolul ro:Stema Țării Românești include o mica parte din ele, chiar si unele care nu apar in categoria de pe Commons. Fiind foarte multe steme si foarte diferite, eram curios daca ai vrea sa clarifici fie pe Commons (in descrierea imaginilor) fie la ro:Stema Țării Românești care au fost folosite de cine si cand. Am inceput sa lucrez la o lista cu batalii care au avut loc in Romania si incerc sa aflu care steme se potrivesc la care batalio. Mersi mult! --Codrin.B (talk) 09:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:BOR CoA.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BOR CoA.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 15:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recensamant 1941

Imi cer scuze ca raspund tarziu. M-am cam retras de pe wikipedia in ultima vreme. Daca vrei, poti sa-mi scrii pe adresa de mail.

Pt. jud. Brasov (numai pt. oras nu am cu toate etniile, dar poti sa faci o corelatie cu situatia de la 1930 sa obtii o estimare) datele sunt urmatoarele:

total: 210.887

romani: 129.950

maghiari: 37.423

germani: 36.677

rusi: 234

ucraineni: 72

sarbi, croati, sloveni: 78

bulgari: 18

cehoslovaci: 355

polonezi: 164

tigani: 2777

evrei: 2760

greci (73), albanezi (2), armeni (40), turci (12), tatari (2), altii si nedeclarati (250)

Andrein (talk), 20:55, 7 April 2013 (EET)

File source is not properly indicated: File:WWI.gif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WWI.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:WWI.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Europe 15th colbeck.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Europe 15th colbeck.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 16:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cupa Campionilor Europeni 1986.jpg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 04:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of the Netherlands.png

File:Coat of arms of the Netherlands.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Troita Junii Brasovecheni.jpg

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian stop signs

THEY ARE THE EXACT SAME THING!!!! If you took half a moment to pay attention, you would see that I changed nothing other than adding a black layer under the sign so that the white edge of the sign is visible. The files still exactly match the Romanian standards, nothing else was changed. Fry1989 ^eh? 22:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luptatori Anticomunisti.jpg

File:Luptatori Anticomunisti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

// Gikü said done Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:29 (UTC) 15:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:UnivTransilvaniaBV.jpg

File:UnivTransilvaniaBV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 21:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian road sign

Hello. I'd like to reproduce Romanian road sign...can you kindly tell me the pdf text of Romania law where there are the new types of road signs (and the old one)? Thank you! --Gigillo83 (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROU CJ Cluj-Napoca CoA.png

File:ROU CJ Cluj-Napoca CoA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—Andrei S. _Talk 13:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Belgium (small, bilingual).png

File:Coat of arms of Belgium (small, bilingual).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tom-L (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For your work on File:Greater Coat of Arms of Romania 1921 - 1947, B&W.svg and File:Kingdom of Romania - Big CoA.svg. Tom-L (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lenin CL.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

coat of arms Dobrogea/Dobrudscha

Hello, do you know of any work in SVG or a high resolution PNG ? --Plupp (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis

Dear Alex:D! Thank you for uploading this interesting file. Do you have any information from which Bellifortis exactly the image is? If possible the depository information and the signature of the manuscript? This info would by very helpful. Especially as there are more than 45 manuscripts of the Bellifortis are survived, and only a view are avalable online. Thank you in advance for your help. --Bullenwächter (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Unfortunately the source where I got this didn't give any details. I'll check again after holidays. Alex:D (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Traiasca Regele.ogg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Traiasca Regele.ogg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Traiasca Regele.ogg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Alex:D/3

Thank you

How?

Romanian domnitors

Image issues

Image Tagging Image:Mussolini1.gif

Steagul Regelui 1922

FP promotion

FP Promotion

Please give images good descriptions

Immagine:WWII_Southern_Central_Europe_1944-1945.png

Stroboscope under article Gramophone

Fototeca online a comunismului românesc

Tip: Categorizing images

Servus !

Cuza si alte imagini Photoshopiate !

Coat of arms of Latvian SSR.png

FP promotion

Copyright status: File:Poiana_Brasov.jpg

Johannes Schiltberger

Insulele de pe bratul Chilia

Imagine

Steagul lui Constantin Brâncoveanu

O. Empire...

Buna ziua!

Deprecated License

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stalin.gif

Posibile probleme cu en:Keyboard_layout#Romanian_.28in_Romania_and_Moldova.29

Please help replace this outdated license

Modificarea numelui unei harti

Help

Întrebäri tehnice

Images and graphics per PD-RO-1956

Licente pentru documente istorice

Romania nu are FoP?!

File source is not properly indicated: File:JuniiBrasoveni_1918bis.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:JuniiBrasoveni_1918.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radu de la Afumati.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coat of arms of Comrat.png

Coat of arms of the Karelo-Finnish SSR

Drapele de lupta

Brasov coat of arms

Notification about possible deletion

Battle of Posada - Medieval book editions

O sursa foarte buna de imagini

Graphic Lab Help

Stemele Țării Românești

Copyright status: File:BOR CoA.png

Recensamant 1941

File source is not properly indicated: File:WWI.gif

Copyright status: File:Europe 15th colbeck.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Romanian stop signs

Romanian road sign

A barnstar for you!

Notification about possible deletion

coat of arms Dobrogea/Dobrudscha

Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis

File source is not properly indicated: File:Traiasca Regele.ogg

Navigation menu

Search