Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cancelation 189.163.15.245 17:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, this is not a reason to delete anything, because free licenses are irrevocable. But the uploader's (user Garcia Martinez Jesus) only contributions in Wikipedia are creating a self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading 3 selfies. One of them is used on his userpage and the others nowhere. All the user's activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope, therefore I will delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is in prior use at other places on the internet and may not be free to use. The description claims to be the work of the uploader, but the image appears on sites with earlier dates, see here for additional copies. Possible COM:COPYVIO, and out of scope, no educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sean Shnehil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are in use elsewhere on the internet, including on here. Possible COM:COPYVIO and self-promotion.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ritu tewary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The model is unlikely to be the photographer, creating a possible COM:COPYVIO. One image is merely a crop of the other and the description indicates an attempt at self-promotion. Commons is not social media.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question, if she says it's her own image, and she's the model, how can she be the photographer as well? We can see both her hands in this image, it's not a selfie, but a pro shot. One image is a crop of the other, hence both were taken by one photographer. My concern - whether the image in use or not - is that itis not likely hers to freely license. I don't see any indication on the image or its description that gives me confidence to assume she has the license rights. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The image obviously comes from here. We do not have a valid permission that this image was published under a free license. COM:OTRS can be consulted by the uploader in order to bring some valid evidence for this free CC license. --High Contrast (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. Yann (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grzegorznadolski as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: out of project scope, personal photo INeverCry 20:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV von Bild.de Mauerquadrant (talk) 21:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: {{Copyvio}}. Martin H. (talk) 01:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacksternberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content visible (wallpaper), questionable scope? ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content visible (wallpaper), questionable scope? ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 02:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, has non-free logo en:File:Qualcomm-SnapDragon.jpg. 레비Revi 07:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 밍진하 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused, personal file.

레비Revi 07:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Headphones905 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely (per res) grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 11:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE them. Bullshit images which are copyright violatons


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album/photo hoster + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rbsl3333 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the globe. Yann (talk) 13:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. MichaelMaggs (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the globe. Yann (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. MichaelMaggs (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the globe. Yann (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. MichaelMaggs (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat croped versaion of same image posted to http://forum.acasatv.ro/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=72284&sid=eb83268ec3a1637ab39b7d54ce5c09dc&start=4710#p6395685 in Febr 2013. --Túrelio (talk) 15:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 21:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Jespinos (talk) 15:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader is not likely to be the copyright owner MichaelMaggs (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hossein8822 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 15:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tpipe6969 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of TV-actor without EXIF data Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jairo Maka Mtm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio or out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaryan Saxena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: the files seem to be unused userphotos. Note that there are multiple different images under one of the file names.

Stefan4 (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied Denniss (talk) 21:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not an own work; probably suitable for fair use on enwiki only. MF-W 19:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - blurry low quality image INeverCry 22:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 23:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yehezkiel Rodhrigo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 02:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from http://www.newreleasetuesday.com/article.php?article_id=140 scroll to end of prose. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. --High Contrast (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I'm not so sure about that this is a personal image. These guys appear to be |w:Los Panchos per the original uploader. Upon reviewing the entire file history, I've reinstated the original licence and description of uploader that was apparently removed by a vandal with additional NPOV comments. Ww2censor (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: as per Ww2censor. Yann (talk) 07:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, no permission, not used. Yann (talk) 08:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete contains also obviously copyrighted material. --High Contrast (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The user is a sockpuppet and self promoter. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishna Arunkumar Mishra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The user is a sockpuppet and self promoter. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without a source. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Personal image, this is a puppetmaster .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikkakm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:57, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikkakm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Puppet master, personal images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of unfree character. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haimpardo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: two, kept one .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gautam lodha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Commons is no private photo album --High Contrast (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by McZusatz , closed by .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
List of 174 files and long discussion
1+

Derivative works of the bottles bottle labels.

-mattbuck (Talk) 15:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for Mattbuck's DR for the contents of these following categories:

Either we are consequential on this one, or this DR is just blatant vandalism and copyfraud-trolling. Ah, and for this one  Keep, unless all other questionable images in the categories listed above are deleted. --Felix Talk! 22:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, this DR follows on from one of vodka bottles. You're quite right, those categories probably need cleaning too, but I only have so much patience for bad faith, thus this will have to do for now. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The focus of the image isn't the bottle, it's the label and the content of that label, so there's no argument for incidental inclusion, meaning these are all derivative works of copyright images and do need to be deleted. The only bottle images that can be kept are those with labels which do not meet the threshold for copyright or those which have passed into the public domain (there should be a few for both and more than enough to provide good quality images of whisky bottles in any case). I'm quite sure we've been here before (maybe it was on English Wikipedia) as I've a feeling of deja vu. Nick (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  KeepI can't comment on every file listed here, nor do I think it's in all our interests to put a DR in some sort of omnibus blanket request. Of the one file that is mine, Cardhu single malt - pure (vatted) malt.JPG I would request an independent review. While the labels are visible, the image relates directly to a controversy involving Diageo Corp. and the passing off of a vatted malt whisky as a single malt. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardhu_distillery#.27Pure_Malt.27_Controversy for more information. The image is vital for the Wiki article in question and for maintaining a public record of what occurred. Markmark28
  • The Cardhu bottle images would need to be considered on a fair use basis, because, once again, it is the label and not the bottle that is the primary subject of the work. The label is not incidental inclusion, but I don't see any issue in retaining the images on local projects under fair use doctrine. Nick (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Split up the request into logical and manageable parts. Some images the bottle is not the main item, some labels are just text and sme may be actual copyvios so please split up the request. // Liftarn (talk)
    A mass-delete request like this is ridiculous. I don't have enough life-span left to judge the merits of each entry.--Pawyilee (talk) 09:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Pawyilee, if you are actively dying, please stop editing and go to a hospital. Liftarn, I would be happy for the DR to be split up into more manageable chunks. Since clearly I am not capable of this, perhaps you could? -mattbuck (Talk) 10:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd be interested to know why you think images such as File:GlenGarioch.jpg aren't copyright violations. That's not plain text, that's not incidental inclusion, that label is the primary subject and reason the photograph was taken, and is no different to a scan of the label in terms of copyright problems. Assumptions of bad faith on the part of the nominator don't help either. Nick (talk) 11:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Matpib: I agree, all images of packaging, be they bottles or general packaging will need to be deleted. I think, looking at the comments of people here, this Deletion Request is going to be insufficient and a more prosaic approach via discussion noticeboards will need to be considered, but ultimately all images which show labels under copyright protection will need to be deleted from the project as they're not free work and cannot be released under a free licence. A large number, probably the majority of images listed as part of this deletion discussion are derivative works and present copyright problems for both Commons and downstream reusers. Nick (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment As I understand, in the US bottles are not copyrightable, per s:Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc. So at least as far as US law is concerned, any claims of derivative work of the bottles are rather questionable. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was specifically about the shape of the bottle. I apologise, I misworded this DR, I mean that these are derivatives of the labels, which I do not believes Ets-Hoken covers. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually no, Ets-Hokin spoke directly on that matter. It ruled that photographs of entire bottles are not derivative works of the labels, even if the labels are copyrightable. A photo must be mainly of the label itself to qualify as a derivative work. When photographing the entire bottle, the label is incidental.
We need not, however, decide whether the label is copyrightable because Ets-Hokin's product shots are based on the bottle as a whole, not on the label. The whole point of the shots was to capture the bottle in its entirety. The defendants have cited no case holding that a bottle of this nature may be copyrightable, and we are aware of none. Indeed, Skyy's position that photographs of everyday, functional, noncopyrightable objects are subject to analysis as derivative works would deprive both amateur and commercial photographers of their legitimate expectations of copyright protection. Because Ets-Hokin's product shots are shots of the bottle as a whole—a useful article not subject to copyright protection—and not shots merely, or even mainly, of its label, we hold that the bottle does not qualify as a "preexisting work " within the meaning of the Copyright Act. As such, the photos Ets-Hokin took of the bottle cannot be derivative works. The district court erred in so concluding.
It's somewhat of a technicality on the wording of the law, but basically the copyright owner of the label really does not have any rights over photos of other objects where the label happened to be (lawfully) used. It's only when focusing on the expression of the label itself would there be an issue. That is not the only such case; in another Florida case there were photos of a motorcycle, which had copyrightable designs painted on it. Someone claimed the photographs of the motorcycle were derivative of the painted designs, and the court (similarly) ruled they were not -- the motorcycle was the "underlying work" in question, not the paintings, and therefore the photo was not a derivative. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Clindberg: How would you address the issue that the possibility that most of the images under this Deletion Request are focused largely or totally on the label ? I can't recall seeing one image which doesn't feature the front label shown in the centre of the image, square on. The Ets-Hokin ruling stems from the images not being merely, or even mainly, of the label but that's arguably what we have here. These images all exist to show the different label for each bottling or distillery, that's why there's several images which show the same bottle and different labels for different ages/bottlings, and indeed, show different products in the same design of bottle. We've also got a few which show the outer packaging carton or sleeve. Nick (talk) 12:22, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(post deletion comment) @Nick: If the point is to show the entire bottle, then it doesn't matter, from the ruling. If the photo crops off the top or bottom of the bottle to focus on the label, then it can get more problematic. If the point is to show the entire bottle, which would of course include whatever label happens to be on the bottle, then it's not a derivative work. The photo is not focusing on the expression of the label itself, but rather the bottle in its entirety, and including whatever label happened to be there. The Absolut photographs from the court case showed the labels head on as well, and as the ruling stated, it didn't matter if that label was copyrightable or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment At least some of those labels are both rather basic text and ornaments as well as quite old. The Jack Daniel's label e. g. It seems to me this label is both below the US threshold of originality as well as in the PD because its basic design is pre-1923. --Rosenzweig τ 19:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In view of s:Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., which is directly on point, I think that mass deletion of liquor bottles is problematic. There may be a few of these which ought to be deleted, but the vast majority will be keepers. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpageimage}}. This image is only in scope if it's used on a userpage. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profilephoto. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profilephoto. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juansepul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These all appears to be photographs taken of the television. COM:DW: non-free.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 13:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juansepul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (video screenshots), per COM:PRP (and 1st nomination, see above), considering User talk:Juansepul (Facebook/newspaper grabber)

Gunnex (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a license, but its unlikely own work as stated. JuTa 20:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 00:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 01:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No credible license. Likely taken from http://www.mywallpapers.org/picture/anna-friel/22676 or similar site The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Copyrightstatus not clear. If you are the copyrightholder please contact commons:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Was (I think) used on this deleted page on the English Wikipedia. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low-resolution GIF image while we have much better svg files (e.g. File:Anti.svg). Perhaps a mobile upload for testing purposes by a new uploader. Rahul Bott (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 15:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely not the uploader's own work: low resoluion and no valid EXIF information makes it very likely for this image being some webgrab High Contrast (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely false authorship claims High Contrast (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 15:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another blurry penis. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Jespinos (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Low resolution, no EXIF data and not likely to be his own work Natuur12 (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarfarazees (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: random snapshot without realistic usage. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata suggests that the image is non-free. Jespinos (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professionally-looking advertising image. It is likely not own work. Jespinos (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 18:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: upload for teenagers vandalism in ruwiki. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen de un niño sin relevancia enciclopédica y mostrándolo claramente. Viola su privacidad y no añade ninguna información relevante. B25es (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unused personal photo Ymblanter (talk) 21:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Indeed and there are several high resolution version available throughout the web. Not likely to be his own work. Natuur12 (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, unclear if this image is in COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image (and won't be used, as uploader is indef'ed) DMacks (talk) 06:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I noticed, that one boy is giving a gesture of horns, pointing towards the other boy, suggesting, that the other boy is actually ... I looked all 114 files in Category:Horn gestures, but the only other such gesture was File:Michael Angelo Batio with a fan.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 20:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We already have much better SVG images in Category:Android logos, e.g., File:Android sample.svg. This one serves no extra purpose. Rahul Bott (talk) 08:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khalilkhan k khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files meant for self-promotion alone. Commons is not a private album. Out of project scope in my opinion.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Commons is not facebook --High Contrast (talk) 11:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khalilkhan k khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mostly unused, personal images, some of them incorporating probably copyrighted material (e.g. File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-38.jpg or File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-36.jpg). Nothing has changed since the last DR: Commons is still not Facebook (see Commons:Scope).

El Grafo (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteThe files should be speedied and the uploader should be issued a strict warning. Some even have plausible privacy issues (e.g. File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-19.jpg). Rahul Bott (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All files are speedy deleted by Denniss. JurgenNL (talk) 07:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per High Contrast, file is a modified printscreen from a youtube video uploaded under a standard youtube license Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational use of this photo is impossible. Commons is not a media repository for private bad quality photos 91.57.94.225 19:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is image is not a work of the person who uploaded it to Commons. It can easiliy be find on the web. besides, the image!s title and the file description is total bullsh*t 91.57.94.225 19:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Checked and can be found on several websites Natuur12 (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a video screenshot; if this screenshot should be free, we need more and certain evidence that the software allows screenshots that are published under free licenses 91.57.94.225 19:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Sims screenshot Natuur12 (talk) 06:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted drawing 91.57.94.225 19:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No correct source and no evidence that the file is under a free license Natuur12 (talk) 06:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, too bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garry Pelia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE

Polarlys (talk) 19:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garry Pelia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photograph of a non-notable person. Commons is not a private album and hence, out of scope in my opinion. Rahul Bott (talk) 07:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.pays-saint-lois.fr/fr/133389813/photographies/aucune/vignettes/smpf-3.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.manchenumerique.fr/var/manchenumerique/storage/images/design/manche-numerique/79641-86-fre-FR/Manche-Numerique.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This seems to me PD-Textlogo, but let the others also think. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD text logo .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are two separate problems with this uploaded map. Firstly it would need a verifiable release from realhula.com if the All Rights Reserved statement at http://www.realhula.com/lemuria.html is correct, secondly the map appears to be a derived work as it overlays a standard looking map of the Pacific Islands that would itself needs a verified copyright status. (talk) 11:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exhibitionism or please clearly describe a medical hint or symtom of disease or educational use Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 12:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal rights, project scope, search results can be assiociated with advertising only Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 13:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 16:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 16:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, the other user's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by spam page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom + copyvio JurgenNL (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple license/ownership confusion. No evidence the actual item is the "own work" of the uploader and no evidence he has permission to release as CC. Not sure image meets threshold of originality to be non-{{PD-text}}, but also just one in a line of unused bad uploads from this editor. DMacks (talk) 18:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, this is ineligible for copyright. Own work, of course, is false. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a company promoting itself. B25es (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The house is in India and there is freedom of panorama in India. The house is probably itself important and the photo illustrates it well. Maybe a bit promotional, but not too much. But the filename is horrible and should be changed. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Feel free to rename, which is not an admin action. Jcb (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed into File:Britco & Bridco building in Kottakkal, Kerala.jpeg. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a company promoting itself. B25es (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo shows well working conditions in Indian enterprises and is so in project scope. I do not see promotionality, but the filename is horrific and should be changed. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Renamed to file:Working conditions at Britco & Bridco.jpg. Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept:: Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely not the uploader's own work - likely a derivative work High Contrast (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is a derivative work. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional only content High Contrast (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, seems ineligible to copyright, but is out of project scope due to blatant promotionality (simply look the filename!). Taivo (talk) 12:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. Besides due to the fact that we do not know who that person is and this file is not used on any Wikimedia project, we should assume that this person might be "out of scope" High Contrast (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. At least the smaller images on the right seem to be TV screenshots High Contrast (talk) 19:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom JurgenNL (talk) 18:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be an Italian movie from the 1960s. I doubt the authorship claims and the CC-license but could {{PD-Italy}} apply? High Contrast (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 19:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 19:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom JurgenNL (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. Commons is not facebook. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. Commons is not facebook. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 19:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 18:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF data: the copyright holder is a person called "Alun.R.Prescott" - no permission given that the uploader can bring it to Commons in order to publish it under a free license. High Contrast (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: If you are the copyrightholder please contact com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF data: the copyright holder is a person called "Alun.R.Prescott" - no permission given that the uploader can bring it to Commons in order to publish it under a free license. High Contrast (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: If you are the copyrightholder please contact com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF data: the copyright holder is a person called "Alun.R.Prescott" - no permission given that the uploader can bring it to Commons in order to publish it under a free license. High Contrast (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: If you are the copyrightholder please contact com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Nonsense filename and file discription as well Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what this was intended to be, but it's not a selfie. It's a blank white rectangle framed with a transparent background. Not needed here.--Auric (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 01:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design on this is way over any COM:TOO and is not part of what makes the ball utilitarian makes the picture a COM:DW and a fair use rational would be needed to cover it meaning that it can't be hosted on commons and it needs to be moved to project that allow fair use. LGA talkedits 04:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC) And[reply]

File:Adidas brazuca.JPG. LGA talkedits 04:43, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was taken from the street, of a ball placed in public display on a window of an Adidas Store in Madrid, Spain. Shouldn't it be covered by FOP? (I've added the apropriate template). Regards. --Damianvila (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Window displays are not covered by FoP due to lack of permanent display. LGA talkedits 06:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, really? You must be an expert in Spanish law then. Can you cite the sentences where you got that from? (Onus probandi, you know...) I'm really interested, because I can give you a couple of links (like this or this) where you can find opinions on the contrary (it's in Spanish, but since you seem to be well versed in Spanish law, I guess you must understand Spanish). --Damianvila (talk) 13:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, can somebody explain to me why none of the other pictures in Category: Adidas footballs -see footer for link- Category: Adidas footballs (which are similar and in most cases fall under the same provisions) are marked with the deletion template? Really, one goes to great lengths to comply with Wikimedia Commons' requirements and tries to do what's needed. This deletion template feels a bit arbitrary, and I'm still puzzled as to the motives. --Damianvila (talk) 13:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well Spanish law (as per the COM:FOP page) states that "Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares may be freely reproduced" are covered, this is not on a street it is inside and there is no indication that is is permanently placed. As for Onus probandi - see COM:EVID LGA talkedits 20:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know exactly what the Spanish law says. And yes, the translation provided by Wikipedia is pretty accurate. This doesn't answer the question though. Where exactly does it say that windows displays are not covered by the Real Decreto? (As you clearly put in your message). I did provide lawyers opinion in my links, giving credit to my point: Shop windows are covered by the law in Spain. The fact that they are not permanent installation does not make them fall outside of the FoP provision granted by the law. You still fail to provide any legal opinion, expert's opinion or judge sentence backing your claim, hence the Onus probandi is on your roof. Regards. --Damianvila (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To meet the requirement for Spanish FoP the Onus probandi is on you to show that it ball is both :
  • Permanently located in the place it is located, and given the plastic stand clearly visible on which the ball is sitting it does not appear to be.
  • and is located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfare and this appears to be located inside the store.
As of now you have not provided anything to show either is the case. LGA talkedits 06:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have provided enough information to make clear that:
  • The object does not need to be permanently located at a place (a shop window is considered covered under the provisions of the Spanish Law) and,
  • The object needs to be visible from the street (and not necessarily located on it).
Anybody can see that by reading the opinions here and here (the same information provided in my second comment).
I have no more to say, and will leave the rest for other people to decide. --Damianvila (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Damianvila, if you’re bitter about your country’s stupid laws, think about it next time you’re having elections, or even join a local advocacy group and press for change — but don’t ask Wikimedia Commons to break those laws (STVLTA‧LEX‧SED‧LEX). This image (and many others, sadly, of other items and in other countries, too) should be deleted because it shows an object that is magically protected over so called intellectual property rights (while the actual creator of this ball’s structural and ornamental design may be destitute — any earnings from licensing those rights will never fatten his or her wallet). Since it would be prepostorous to legislate otherwise, that magical protection is suspended if the object is a permanent fixture in a public place, but that’s about it. Since the object is inside a store, regardless of the location of the photographer, it is magically protected from our eyescameras. Of course, were this a store selling antiques the issue would be moot, because anything older than Mickey Mouse an arbitrary date, ridiculously long after the author’s death, lacks the said magical protection. That’s why anyone can take pictures of Michelangelo’s David, but not of a crappy football. (In your London Harrod’s example, the photo is argueably free for the author because the windowshop contents are deemed to be uncopyrightable utilitary objects, unlike, appallingly, the Brazuca.) -- Tuválkin 04:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The question is simple: Why would Commons allow files such as Jabulani or Teamgeist and not this one? We're not discussing about logos so TOO should not apply here. - Fma12 (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Otherstuffexits is not a reason to keep this, the design on the ball is way over any TOO and is not part of what makes the ball utilitarian and therefore is copyright and we need a licence from the owner of the design to host here. LGA talkedits 20:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with you that "other stuff exists" is not a valid reason, the question I've raised is still unanswered: Why only this images is marked for deletion and not others with similar conditions?. I'd like you to give some clear and direct answer to this question, because I believe that either the rest of the images should be considered for deletion too or the deletion request on this one is arbitrary. Why the disparity on the criteria? Why the difference in treatment? --Damianvila (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to start a DR on any image you feel does not meet the requirements for hosting on commons. LGA talkedits 06:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my intention to start arbitrary DR on any image. I'm more worried about the arbitrariness on placing one on this image. I'll see if this action needs to be reported to an Administrator in the future. --Damianvila (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons FASTILY 09:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks too much like this picture and according to the website's TOU here "Unless otherwise stated, copyright and all intellectual property rights in all material presented on the site (including but not limited to text, audio, video or graphical images), trademarks and logos appearing on this site are the property of Malayala Manorama company ltd, its parent, affiliates and associates and are protected under applicable Indian laws. You are permitted to print or download extracts from these pages for your personal non-commercial use only." It is unclear what license the uploader wants to upload under. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false authorship claims. Image appears also here High Contrast (talk) 11:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well, the image quality is of a quality which may come from a screenshot (e.g. from some YouTube video). I doubt that the uploader has created this image. The fact that the image is of typical web resolution and has no EXIF data strengthens my concerns High Contrast (talk) 11:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 11:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 11:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - furthermore likely false authorship claims High Contrast (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and possibly a copyright violation (it appears also here) High Contrast (talk) 11:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 11:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely false authorship claims High Contrast (talk) 11:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no educational value High Contrast (talk) 11:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of a copyrighted map; no permission for a free license given High Contrast (talk) 11:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 11:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Federicospinosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be nothing but a personal image, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio as well, see photo at bottom (direct link)--Auric (talk) 13:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted image created by the user IndianBio (talk) 13:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedydeleted at 3 January by EugeneZelenko JurgenNL (talk) 11:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justtobeatforbes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope and maybe cyberbullying JurgenNL (talk) 11:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think we have enough images of that and this one adds no new knowledge. Rahul Bott (talk) 16:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shannon mccain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user images, out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used to vandalize pages on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 19:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional. B25es (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The low resolution of this image does not seem to provide any useful content that would realistically be used for any educational purpose. The very vague and ambiguous title "This is an expensive place" does not provide a good indication of why this place is expensive, the picture does not show this, and there does not seem to be educational value derived from this. This image therefore falls outside of Commons:Scope. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No description, no cat, no keep. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC) NOTE: I have moved this file to File:Girl making a v-sign.jpg during the course of this DR.[reply]

  • Although I suspect this is a self-portrait/selfie, and if the user wants to place it on her own user page, that would be sufficient reason to keep (though it should be renamed). - Jmabel ! talk 01:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unusable personal photo. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   00:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unusable personal photo. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   00:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. This is not Facebook. P 1 9 9   00:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per above. - Fma12 (talk) 05:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. This is not Facebook. P 1 9 9   00:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a TV screenshot (DW of a copyrighted image); the file name is nonsense as is the file description. High Contrast (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Much bigger source image here. If it is {{PD-old}} or otherwise free, should be overwritten with this, and have the demential filname changed. -- Tuválkin 01:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 19:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Callygraphy sample taken from here (image). While typefaces are inherently free, what about the copyrights of the arrangement, and of the text itself? If this image is found to be free, then it needs to be overwritten at the original resolution, to have the authors properly credited, and to have its lunatic filename fixed. -- Tuválkin 02:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 19:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No aporta ninguna información. Dice que es trabajo propio, pero dice que no la ha hecho. No se ajusta a la finalidad del proyecto. B25es (talk) 11:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 19:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo by a new user which has been heavily photoshopped to add the glasses. As Commons is not facebook, out of scope in my opinion. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image available since atleast 8 weeks on the internet. A possibly unfree file by a new user. Should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion B25es (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Derative of a non free logo and per nom Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Hmm I can see the educational purpose of this one but small resolution and no exif data. Natuur12 (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster 79.237.174.9 17:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't me that uploaded this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this it was someone else MariamOfficial (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: if you say so. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't me that uploaded this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this it was someone else MariamOfficial (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: if you say so. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't me that uploaded this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this it was someone else MariamOfficial (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: if you say so. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't me that uploaded this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this it was someone else MariamOfficial (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: if you say so. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't me that uploaded this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this it was someone else MariamOfficial (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: if you say so. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't me that uploaded this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this MariamOfficial (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload this it was someone else MariamOfficial (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: if you say so. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope- private picture Narayan (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - private picture Narayan (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - not educationally usefull Narayan (talk) 22:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - private picture Narayan (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - private picture Narayan (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that this is useful for any educational purpose under COM:SCOPE. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is almost certainly a copyright image from the gallery at [2] (please click on the fourth image from the left). The page has a copyright note at the bottom in Bengali script (© সর্বস্বত্ব স্বত্বাধিকার সংরক্ষিত প্রথম আলো ১৯৯৮-২০১৪), roughly translated as "© All rights reserved First Light 1998 - 014". Green Giant (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted by Tabercil Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are sculptures for which there can be no FOP, etc.

russavia (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep That private work. -- gind2005 13:53, 12 Janvier 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: Per nom. Natuur12 (talk) 22:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 20:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.sfgate.com/raiders/article/Raiders-tap-McGloin-to-start-with-Pryor-still-hurt-4988467.php, AP photo X96lee15 (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this, and how is it useful? See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BSS12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old pictures and logos. Certainly not own works. Wrong licenses.

Yann (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not likely to be his own work, no indication that those files are pd. The logo is blurry. Natuur12 (talk) 10:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality selfie composite Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. B25es (talk) 16:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 13:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image with no EXIF data; appears to be cropped from a video of some sort (see poor cropping job at bottom of image), likely non-free ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 04:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing found on multiple websites online (forums, anime sites, etc.); nature of drawing and lack of information make it most likely non-free ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 04:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Anime/manga. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]